VIEWS: 409 PAGES: 3 POSTED ON: 10/1/2013
Space and Science Research Corporation P.O. Box 607841 * Orlando, FL 32860 (407) 985-3509 * www.spaceandscience.net UN-IPCC Climate Report Condemned Monday, September 30, 2013 Press Release 8-2013 8:00 AM The Space and Science Research Corporation (SSRC), has just released a profoundly critical review the UN-IPCC’s latest climate report, “Climate Change 2013, The Physical Science Basis, Summary for Policymakers.” In the SSRC’s own ‘Assessment’ of this Summary from the UN- IPCC, it issues what may be strongest condemnation of UN-IPCC reports to date from an authoritative climate research organization. Edited by other SSRC Associate Scientists, the primary author of the SSRC review was Mr. John Casey, SSRC President. In addition to that position, Mr. Casey is a well-known climate lecturer and author of the internationally acclaimed climate book, “Cold Sun.” He is also the Editor of the Global Climate Status Report (GCSR), and has recently been called “America’s best climate prediction expert.”* On August 21, 2013, near Miami, Florida, he and other scientists held an important news conference where they announced the coming end of global sea level rise caused by the now ten year long cooling of the Earth’s oceans and the rapidly approaching new cold climate era. The SSRC is the leading climate research organization in the United States in terms of its advocacy for a national and international plan to prepare for the approaching dangerous cold climate that it and other science organizations have predicted. From its separately posted Assessment of the UN-IPCC Summary for Policymakers, comes this critical opinion: ************************ “This Summary and future portions of AR5 based on the science contained in this Summary, should be discarded. Given the host of significant errors, flaws in judgment, and simply bad science found in the Summary, it should not be considered as a worthwhile scientific document for any policymaker interested in understanding the full range of causes and effects of climate change and what the next climate era will be like. The report also provides sufficient evidence to conclude that there may have been serious scientific misconduct and breach of professional ethics by the UN-IPCC and the Summary’s authors.” ************************ The SSRC Assessment of the UN’s Summary goes into the many claims and predictions made in the Summary and evaluates each one for accuracy and likelihood of predictions coming true. The end result is a firm condemnation of the climate science in the Summary. Reviewing the past history of the UN-IPCC climate reports Mr. Casey says, “We now have the first module out from the fifth UN-IPCC climate report to be published since 1990 and the bottom line is that this report is nothing more than a repeat from the same tired, old, mantra that mankind’s industrial gas emissions cause climate change. Using the valueless greenhouse gas theory, the UN begs us once again to believe their global climate models (GCM) can accurately tell us where the Earth’s global temperatures and sea levels are headed, even though such models have routinely failed to predict climate change by a wide margin. This comes, even after wasted billions of dollars and more than twenty years of effort in their try to change this ’sows ear’ of a climate theory into a ‘silk purse.’ This two decade story of the UN’s climate contrivance is analogous to the career bank robber being let out of prison on good behavior and his promise to go straight. Yet he is arrested for his fifth bank robbery the day after he is released, except this time he kills a bank teller. This whole sad story in the history of science needs to be ended. The bank robber needs to be put away for eternity! The point behind the fictional killing of the bank teller is why this report is the worst of all the UN-IPCC reports. The reason is because in this Summary, the UN completely disregards the fact that a potentially dangerous cold climate has begun and yet continues to predict ever warmer temperatures to 2100! The comprehensive and embarrassing denial of the true status of the Earth’s climate and its future, has now reached a state of clinical psychosis within the UN and elements of the US government, and the media that use these deeply disappointing UN reports. This Summary establishes without a doubt, that the apparent political objectives keeping the UN-IPCC alive have finally caused its climate science to become fully detached from reality.” The SSRC publishes the only apolitical, authoritative, detailed review of the Earth’s climate status on a quarterly basis in its Global Climate Status Report (GCSR)©. Mr. Casey references this report by adding, “In our most recent Edition 3-2013 of the GCSR we found that of the twenty-four global climate parameters we measure, twenty showed global cooling was the dominant trend. We expect the remaining warm or neutral parameters to join the rest and switch to cooling within the next five years. The two most important of these parameters, global atmospheric and oceanic temperatures have been in cooling phase for seven and ten years respectively. Further, we have now had sixteen years without any effective global warming. Add to this status that other respected climate researchers are now saying another “Little Ice Age” could start as early as next year. The UN-IPCC has become a closed organization, isolated form the real world and scientifically allergic to the only proven, accurate, and reliable measures of climate change – natural cycles of the Sun.” Mr. Casey also warns against using these latest UN-IPCC climate reports by any government officials. He elaborates on this matter by saying, “Most elected leaders and government officials are bound by standards of official conduct if not the letter of the law, to conduct planning and policy development using the ‘best available science.’ The track record of the UN-IPCC for the past twenty years using the greenhouse gas (GHG) theory, man’s industrial CO2 output, and associated global climate models (GCM), is not only not the ‘best’ but is arguably the ‘worst’ available science. This is especially true when one compares the UN’s disproven GHG theory and terrible, climate prediction record to the performance of solar activity forcing climate models, which have always been far superior in both accuracy and reliability. Unfortunately, the UN-IPCC, in an astounding fit of disregard of the facts, has chosen in this Summary to not acknowledge past mistakes but instead, reinforce its ingrained bad science. One must therefore conclude that the UN-IPCC is not only still highly unreliable as a source of climate science for policymakers, but indeed, has now become incorrigible. Some past UN-IPCC report authors have now come forward retracting their previous support of these UN climate reports. Acknowledging what many climate researchers have known for years, some UN-IPCC report contributors have at last admitted the UN’s climate models “…simply don’t work.” Again, this report will rank the ‘worst’ because of the blatant attempt by the UN to try once more to convince the world that mankind still controls the planet’s climate when the totality of the science, the current status of the Earth’s climate, and the advent of a destructive new cold climate tells every reasonable mind on the planet, that such is not the case. There is not a single example in existence in any field of science where humans stopped any extreme events of nature from happening, like stopping volcanoes erupting, sea rising, the Earth rotating, warming the cold winters or cooling the hot summers. In other words, the major point of the global warming paradigm is that we as humans can do something about these powerful natural forces, i.e. we are in control of them, while the opposite is true. It has been the opinion of the SSRC for years that the use of the disproved greenhouse gas theory to fabricate mankind’s alleged role in climate change constitutes the greatest international scientific fraud in history. This Summary for Policymakers does nothing but assure us that our opinion remains intact.” The SSRC Assessment of the UN-IPCC Summary for Policymakers may be downloaded from the SSRC web site at www.spaceandscience.net from the “Press Release” page. *Watchdogwire.com, March 25, 2013.
Pages to are hidden for
"ssrcpressrelease82013unipccclimatereportcondemned"Please download to view full document