Document Sample

Discrimination and Classification Discrimination Situation: We have two or more populations p1, p2, etc (possibly p-variate normal). The populations are known (or we have data from each population) We have data for a new case (population unknown) and we want to identify the which population for which the new case is a member. Examples The Basic Problem Suppose that the data from a new case x1, … , xp has joint density function either : p1: f(x1, … , xn) or p2: g(x1, … , xn) We want to make the decision to D1: Classify the case in p1 (f is the correct distribution) or D2: Classify the case in p2 (g is the correct distribution) The Two Types of Errors 1. Misclassifying the case in p1 when it actually lies in p2. Let P[1|2] = P[D1|p2] = probability of this type of error 2. Misclassifying the case in p2 when it actually lies in p1. Let P[2|1] = P[D2|p1] = probability of this type of error This is similar Type I and Type II errors in hypothesis testing. Note: A discrimination scheme is defined by splitting p – dimensional space into two regions. 1. C1 = the region were we make the decision D1. (the decision to classify the case in p1) 2. C2 = the region were we make the decision D2. (the decision to classify the case in p2) There can be several approaches to determining the regions C1 and C2. All concerned with taking into account the probabilities of misclassification P[2|1] and P[1|2] 1. Set up the regions C1 and C2 so that one of the probabilities of misclassification , P[2|1] say, is at some low acceptable value a. Accept the level of the other probability of misclassification P[1|2] = b. 2. Set up the regions C1 and C2 so that the total probability of misclassification: P[Misclassification] = P[1] P[2|1] + P[2]P[1|2] is minimized P[1] = P[the case belongs to p1] P[2] = P[the case belongs to p2] 3. Set up the regions C1 and C2 so that the total expected cost of misclassification: E[Cost of Misclassification] = c2|1P[1] P[2|1] + c1|2 P[2]P[1|2] is minimized P[1] = P[the case belongs to p1] P[2] = P[the case belongs to p2] c2|1= the cost of misclassifying the case in p2 when the case belongs to p1. c1|2= the cost of misclassifying the case in p1 when the case belongs to p2. 4. Set up the regions C1 and C2 The two types of error are equal: P[2|1] = P[1|2] Computer security: p1: Valid users p2: Imposters P[2|1] = P[identifying a valid user as an imposter] P[1|2] = P[identifying an imposter as a valid user ] P[1] = P[valid user] P[2] = P[imposter] c2|1= the cost of identifying the user as an imposter when the user is a valid user. c1|2= the cost of identifying the user as a valid user when the user is an imposter. This problem can be viewed as an Hypothesis testing problem H0:p1 is the correct population HA:p2 is the correct population P[2|1] = a P[1|2] = b Power = 1 - b The Neymann-Pearson Lemma Suppose that the data x1, … , xn has joint density function f(x1, … , xn ;q) where q is either q1 or q2. Let g(x1, … , xn) = f(x1, … , xn ;q1) and h(x1, … , xn) = f(x1, … , xn ;q2) We want to test H0: q = q1 (g is the correct distribution) against HA: q = q2 (h is the correct distribution) The Neymann-Pearson Lemma states that the Uniformly Most Powerful (UMP) test of size a is to reject H0 if: and accept H0 if: where ka is chosen so that the test is of size a . Proof: Let C be the critical region of any test of size a. Let We want to show that Note: hence and Thus and Thus and when we add the common quantity Q.E.D. to both sides. Fishers Linear Discriminant Function. Suppose that x1, … , xp is either data from a p-variate Normal distribution with mean vector: The covariance matrix S is the same for both populations p1 and p2. The Neymann-Pearson Lemma states that we should classify into populations p1 and p2 using: That is make the decision D1 : population is p1 if l ≥ ka or or and Finally we make the decision D1 : population is p1 if where The function Is called Fisher’s linear discriminant function In the case where the populations are unknown but estimated from data Fisher’s linear discriminant function Example 2 Annual financial data are collected for firms approximately 2 years prior to bankruptcy and for financially sound firms at about the same point in time. The data on the four variables • x1 = CF/TD = (cash flow)/(total debt), • x2 = NI/TA = (net income)/(Total assets), • x3 = CA/CL = (current assets)/(current liabilties, and • x4 = CA/NS = (current assets)/(net sales) are given in the following table. The data are given in the following table: Examples using SPSS

DOCUMENT INFO

Shared By:

Categories:

Tags:

Stats:

views: | 0 |

posted: | 7/24/2013 |

language: | English |

pages: | 30 |

OTHER DOCS BY yurtgc548

How are you planning on using Docstoc?
BUSINESS
PERSONAL

By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy and
terms of service, and to receive content and offer notifications.

Docstoc is the premier online destination to start and grow small businesses. It hosts the best quality and widest selection of professional documents (over 20 million) and resources including expert videos, articles and productivity tools to make every small business better.

Search or Browse for any specific document or resource you need for your business. Or explore our curated resources for Starting a Business, Growing a Business or for Professional Development.

Feel free to Contact Us with any questions you might have.