Docstoc

Health System Performance Comparisons of Financial Protection

Document Sample
Health System Performance Comparisons of Financial Protection Powered By Docstoc
					     Improving the Measurement of
         Financial Protection in
            Health Systems
             Dr Rodrigo Moreno-Serra
   Centre for Health Policy, Imperial College London
            r.moreno-serra@imperial.ac.uk


PCPH, Imperial College London, 5th October 2011
                 Background
• Financial protection (FP): extent to which
  people are protected from the financial
  consequences of illness
  – Key objective of health care (HC) systems,
    multidimensional
  – Financial hardship and lack of access to HC due to
    costs still widespread (WHR 2010)
  – FP may suffer in a context of economic downturn
  – Monitoring FP is crucial for sound health policy
 FP measurement: where are we?
• Focus on households’ living standards before
  and after direct payments for health (OOPs)
• OOPs reported in household surveys
Catastrophic spending
  – OOPs cross set threshold in terms of share of
    disposable income
Impoverishing spending
  – OOPs push household income below a chosen
    poverty line
          FP metrics: criticisms
1. Measurement of capacity to pay, effects of
   lost income etc...
2. Effect of financial barriers to access: the
   elephant in the room
  – Ability to pay may deter access to necessary HC
  – Linked to equity but indicator of FP extent
  – Sole focus on incurred spending may provide
    misleading picture of FP
     Catastrophic spending incidence and DTP3 immunization
     coverage among 1 year-olds, 87 countries (various years)




Source: Immunization data from WHO. Catastrophic spending incidence data from Xu et al. (2007). Financial
catastrophe is defined as OOPs for health reaching at least 40% of a household’s non-subsistence income.
                                                    Financial barriers to access in high-income countries
                                                        with low incidence of financial catastrophe
                                               35



                                               30
Had problems with access because of cost (%)




                                               25



                                               20


                                               15



                                               10


                                               5



                                               0




                                                                                                                                                           A
                                                            a



                                                                  da




                                                                                                   s
                                                                                     y




                                                                                                                      ay
                                                                                                             d




                                                                                                                             en




                                                                                                                                               d



                                                                                                                                                   UK
                                                                           e




                                                                                               nd
                                                                                  an
                                                                         nc
                                                        ali




                                                                                                               n




                                                                                                                                           lan




                                                                                                                                                        US
                                                                                                                   rw



                                                                                                                             ed
                                                                  na




                                                                                                            ala
                                                                                 m
                                                    str




                                                                          a




                                                                                             rla




                                                                                                                                        er
                                                                                                                   No
                                                                       Fr
                                                                Ca




                                                                                                                           Sw
                                                                                  r




                                                                                                         Ze
                                                Au




                                                                                               e
                                                                               Ge




                                                                                                                                    itz
                                                                                            th



                                                                                                         w




                                                                                                                                  Sw
                                                                                         Ne



                                                                                                       Ne




                                                       Source: IHPS, Commonwealth Fund (Schoen et al. 2010).
 Financial Protection Measures:
Suggested Areas for Development
   I. Complementing conventional
            FP indicators
• Coverage indicators
   –   WHR 2010
   –   Generally feasible route
   –   But often limited information available
   –   Role of various other determinants of coverage levels
• Access surveys
   – E.g., IHPS (Commonwealth Fund), World Health
     Surveys (WHO), LSMS (World Bank)
   – Need implementation on routine and comparable
     basis
       II. Improving conventional
              FP indicators
• ‘Need-adjusted’ FP metrics
   – Estimate expected utilization and OOPs according
     to ‘medical need’ characteristics
   – Adjust catastrophic and impoverishing spending
     incidence (expected incidence)
   – May yield very different policy conclusions from
     conventional analysis (e.g., Pradhan and Prescott 2002)
   – But methodologically challenging
      III. An exploratory tool:
 Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)
• Based on economic concept of production frontier
• Through linear programming, find units that achieve
  same (or better) outputs at lower use of inputs

                              • Efficiency = actual/optimal
                                performance (OQA/OQ1)
                              • Can examine efficiency
                                based on multiple outputs
                                (e.g., FP indicators) and
                                inputs
  DEA applied to FP assessment
• Question: How do developing countries compare
  concerning efficiency in ‘producing’ FP given available
  resources (constraints)?
• Criteria for efficiency analysis: FP indicators relative to
  total health spending (THE) per capita (input orientation)
• Gets at the issue of achievable FP performance

Financial protection proxy                     Mean     Std. Dev.   Countries
Protection against catastrophic spending (%)    96.9      2.7          58

Median immun. coverage (6 vaccines) (%)         84.4      11.8         58

Births attended by skilled personnel (%)        73.6      27.4         58

THE per capita (PPP, constant 2005 US$)        253.49    244.93        58
DEA applied to FP assessment
DEA applied to FP assessment
           Concluding remarks
• Financial barriers: distorting effects on
  conventional FP assessments
• Despite recent progress, we need better FP
  metrics for:
  – Policy guidance
  – International performance comparisons
• Huge potential gains from a health policy
  perspective

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:0
posted:7/18/2013
language:English
pages:14