PowerPoint Presentation - The London Oratory School

Document Sample
PowerPoint Presentation - The London Oratory School Powered By Docstoc
					roman Politics
(an introduction)
                Roman Society
Government: The Senate (debates issues and puts
            forward proposals for laws (leges)
            The Assemblies         (votes on the senate’s
            proposals and passes laws but doesn’t have
            the ability to make laws)
              ----------------------------
               The People:
              The nobility (Patricians)
              The Knights (Equites)
              The people (Plebians)
              non citizens & slaves
  Roman Government
CONSULS (2): chief civil and military
magistrates; invested with imperium
PRAETORS (2-8): administered civil law at
Rome.
AEDILES (2): In charge of religious festivals,
public games, temples, upkeep of city,
regulation of marketplaces, grain supply.
QUAESTORS (12-20): financial officers and
administrative assistants (civil and military); in
charge of state treasury at Rome; in field,
served as quartermasters and seconds- in-
command.
TRIBUNES (10): charged with protection of
lives and property of plebians; had power of
veto (Lat. "I forbid") over elections, laws,
decrees of the senate, and the acts of all other
magistrates (except dictator);
CENSORS (2): elected every 5 years to
conduct census, enroll new citizens, review roll
of senate (ex- consuls only) -- enormous
prestige and influence (auctoritas).
                      The Equites
• As the previous diagram showed the equites (knights) did
  not have a place in the workings of government but the
  distinction between the Patricians and the Equites is not
  always apparent from historical events and needs to be
  clarified.
   – Some patricians represented the interests of the equites while some
     equites were happy to maintain the status quo.
• The equites were essentially the financiers of the empire.
• They organised the collection of taxes and acted as bankers
  to the empire.
• This sort of work was beneath the senatorial classes who
  gained their wealth from the ownership of land and so the
  two classes worked in tandem. The senators running
  government and controlling the land and the equites
  controlling the commercial side of things.
• The was movement between the classes but it was very
  difficult for someone from the equestrian class to become a
  senator.
• Those who held the rank of senator were very protective of
  their position of privilege and rarely extended their rank
  beyond those whose family were already senatorial.
• As with most things the equites interests were represented
  by senators such as M Crassus and Julius Caesar (in
  exchange for financial backing and political support in
  elections).
   – For a very good account of the equites see M Crawford’s The
     Roman Republic (appendix II).
                 A political career
• A man of senatorial rank would start their career early,
  possibly working in the law courts or for one of the city
  administrators.
• They would then go to the provinces and hold a very minor
  command.

   – Military and political careers went hand in hand. Glory and
     prestige on the field of battle were essential qualities in a Roman
     politician.
• Upon returning to Rome they would stand for election to
  one of the smaller administrative posts such as Aedile.
• After which it would be back to the provinces but this time
  one could expect to hold a mire influential post in
  command of a sizeable force.
• The career would continued to jump between Rome and
  the provinces with each successive step requiring greater
  influence, prestige and ability and as such offered much
  stiffer competition until one reached the consulship and
  then went onto become a governor in the provinces.

• All the time behind this was the idea that the senate itself
  controlled who got what post and when. By doing so they
  made sure that they all had an equal chance of holding
  posts and exploiting the system while also controlling
  anyone who got too powerful.
• This system can be best summed up in the phrase peace
  with honour. Peace within the ranks of senators and
  honour in making sure that no one had more power or
  influence than you did.
                       Elections
• It is important to know how Roman politics worked if we
  are to fully understand the driving force behind many of
  the actions taken by politicians during this period.

• Roman politics was nothing if it wasn’t corrupt.
• Power and Wealth were the two driving forces behind any
  politicians career. There was no sense that government
  was for the interests of the people or that there was a moral
  obligation to run government in the interests of the people.
• The senators were out for themselves and themselves but
  to be able to satisfy their greed they had to first get power
  and this was equally corrupt.
• Although bribery was technically illegal it went on all the
  time.
• This was possible because of the way society was
  structured.

The Client-Patron system

• Roman society was heavily structured along lines of
  wealth and position. Those above you in society were
  patrons. Those below you were clients.
• Patrons would look after clients in business, legal matters
  and sometimes by financial grants for favours in return.
               THE CLIENT PATRON SYSTEM

                                                     SENATORS


                     EQUITES


Tax collectors, merchants, traders (not just citizens)


                                                              wealthy CITIZENS
                                                                  Merchants

                                               Middle class CITIZENS
                                                   Shop keepers

                                                             Lower class CITIZENS
                                                                 Tradesmen
• The higher up the scale one was the more clients you had
  to look after. Equally you could control the clients of your
  clients and their client also etc.

• Consequently a senator who wanted to win an election
  would ask his clients to vote for him. They in return
  would ask their clients to vote for the patron and so on
  down the line.
• This way a senator could count on thousands of votes
  while only having direct contact with a manageable
  number of clients.
• But the expectations of patrons were matched by the
  expectations of their clients and to ensure a loyal client
  base patrons would distribute their wealth freely.
• Consequently although the financial system was inherently
  unequal the client-patron system ensured that a significant
  amount of the empire wealth that went into the hands of
  the privileged few managed to find its ways down through
  the system, especially at election time (which, for many
  posts, was an annual affair).
• And it wasn’t just at election time that the client-patron
  system worked. When the assemblies voted on laws they
  had to be cajoled into voting for the laws put forward by
  the senators.
• Not forgetting that these laws would always enact
  measures that favoured the senatorial classes.
• For the people to vote for these laws there had to be
  something in it for the people.

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:1
posted:7/15/2013
language:Unknown
pages:12