Docstoc

CSU 2001

Document Sample
CSU 2001 Powered By Docstoc
					CAMPUS COMPUTING 2001 Special Analysis for the CSU System

CSU System Number of Respondents GENERAL CAMPUS POLICIES ABOUT DESKTOP COMPUTERS Does your institution have: A formal policy promoting or mandating computers/ technology resources for Curriculum utilization? Undergraduates? Graduate/Professional students? Distance education? A computer instruction, computer competency, technology literacy or information literacy requirement for all undergraduates? A special computer use/technology fee or annual/term computer use charge for all students? Average computer use fee (where charged) Code of conduct/acceptable use policy for campus e-mail accounts and individual Web pages? Operating systems recommended/supported* Mac OS 9 or earlier Mac OS X UNIX Linux Windows 95/98/ME Windows NT Workstation Windows 2000 Windows XP Open VMS Novell None Do you require or strongly recommend microcomputer ownership for All students No Recommend Require Students in specific disciplines or programs No Recommend Require Students in individual academic units/prof. programs No Recommend Require Does your institution recommend a particular brand/product for* Hardware students? faculty? administrators/staff? Software students? faculty? administrators/staff? Brands/kinds recommended by your institution* Apple/Macintosh iMacs G-4 desktop computers iBooks PowerBooks Windows Compatibles Pentium III class desktops/notebooks Pentium Celeron desktops/notebooks Pentium IV class desktops/notebooks Unix/Linux Systems Compaq IBM Sun Dell Silicon Graphics HP Other Percentages by campus category. *Columns may total more than 100% since responses were not mutually exclusive. 22

Master I Public 87

Master II Public 7

40.9 50.0 36.4 40.9 40.9 9.1 68 86.4 90.9 63.6 77.3 27.3 72.7 81.8 86.4 18.2 4.5 22.7 4.5

32.9 35.7 25.0 36.0 46.0 62.1 116 93.0 81.6 56.3 70.1 44.8 89.7 85.1 87.4 16.1 27.6 41.4 2.3

42.9 28.6 28.6 42.9 71.4 85.7 1,958 100.0 85.7 42.9 57.1 28.6 57.1 85.7 85.7 14.3 28.6 42.9 -

$

$

$

40.9 50.0 9.1 31.6 57.9 10.5 36.8 52.6 10.5

57.5 39.1 3.5 40.7 54.3 4.9 44.4 46.9 8.6

71.4 14.3 14.3 66.7 33.3 66.7 33.3 -

31.8 59.1 68.2 81.8 81.8 86.4

28.7 77.0 80.5 66.7 84.7 88.2

28.6 85.7 85.7 57.1 85.7 85.7

40.9 72.7 27.3 45.5 72.7 27.3 50.0 13.6 18.2 45.5 22.7 9.1 9.1 4.5

46.0 70.1 24.1 37.9 71.3 23.0 63.2 13.8 11.5 40.2 28.7 11.5 5.7 8.0

28.6 57.1 14.3 71.4 28.6 28.6 14.3 28.6 28.6 14.3

page 1

CAMPUS COMPUTING 2001 Special Analysis for the CSU System

CSU System HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE RESALE POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Does your institution have pricing or resale agreement with Hardware vendors? No No, sell through on-campus facility Yes, sold through bookstore Yes, sold through entity not affiliated with bookstore Yes, sold by an off-campus dealer Yes, sold online with one or more vendors Software vendors? No No, sell through on-campus facility Yes, sold through bookstore Yes, sold through entity not affiliated with bookstore Yes, sold by an off-campus dealer Yes, sold online with one or more vendors Does your institution require computer buyers to purchase software as part of the resale No Strongly encouraged Required Does your institution have a written policy regarding duplication of copywrited No No, but under development Yes Percentages by campus category. CURRENT IT/COMPUTER FACILITIES AND RESOURCES Headcount enrollment on campus as of Spring 2001 Number of institution owned desktop or notebook computers and workstations Number of institution owned Unix workstations Number of personally owned desktop computers Proportion of individuals who own desktop or notebook computers Students Desktops Notebooks Faculty Desktops Notebooks Number of desktop/notebook computers purchased by: 2000-01 Students Faculty Administrators/staff Campus labs, clusters & other instructional use 2001-02 Students Faculty Administrators/staff Campus labs, clusters & other instructional use Number of desktop computer labs, clusters and classrooms How many dedicated to departments or units? Number of desktop computers/workstations in all labs/classrooms/clusters Computers Unix Workstations Number of network servers Percentage of operating systems installed on institutionally-owned computers and servers Computers/clients Mac Win 95/98/2000 Win NT Unix Linux Network servers Mac Win NT Win 2000 Server Unix Linux Novell FTE of IT help desk/technical support personnel Ratio user support (enrollment/help desk) Percentage of faculty with individual/personal Web page Percentage of classes that use: Computer-based classrooms/labs Computer simulations Presentation handouts Electronic mail Commercial courseware/instructional resources Internet resources Course management tools for online course resources Web pages for class materials and resources Means by campus category.

Master I Public

Master II Public

25.0 5.0 40.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 4.8 9.5 42.9 23.8 19.1 86.4 13.6 13.6 86.4

34.2 1.3 27.9 10.1 8.9 17.7 24.7 3.7 35.8 19.8 12.4 3.7 81.2 15.3 3.5 2.3 9.2 88.5

42.9 28.6 28.6 33.3 16.7 50.0 60.0 20.0 20.0 100.0

16,181 3,110 93 2,205

10,532 2,322 72 1,392

6,941 1,387 71 287

68.5 12.6 84.0 16.5

58.6 10.2 83.0 14.6

30.7 20.1 62.0 10.7

1,905 171 186 331 2,250 158 163 359 132 86 1,105 51 104

1,104 205 187 276 1,303.5 219.7 190.3 281.9 73.5 40.2 818 30 62

286 59 64 179 342 108 87 170 31 23 437 31 28

19.7 55.5 25.3 4.0 2.8 5.4 49.2 14.4 22.2 7.8 13.4 28.8 561.9 38.3 32.5 26.3 54.7 73.5 16.9 52.7 20.2 49.2

14.7 69.6 15.2 3.6 1.9 4.2 42.9 22.7 17.2 10.6 18.1 20.0 526.6 30.0 27.8 19.3 48.1 67.2 20.1 54.6 20.8 44.5

10.0 66.1 22.4 3.2 1.5 3.8 36.3 41.3 7.8 2.8 52.5 21.6 321.4 30.6 30.0 23.6 57.9 62.1 17.9 55.7 25.7 38.6

page 2

CAMPUS COMPUTING 2001 Special Analysis for the CSU System

CSU System ACADEMIC & INSTRUCTIONAL COMPUTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES & RESOURCES Does your campus/institution have/provide Plan for integrating IT into the curriculum Projects for developing desktop instructional software/courseware Support for faculty developing instructional software/courseware Support for faculty developing software for their research Program for rewarding courseware development Technology resource center focusing on use of IT Agreements/licenses for duplication of software products Plan for using Internet resources in instruction Plan for using Internet resources in distance education Plan for using Internet for marketing to off-campus audiences Program to reward use of IT in faculty review/promotion process Maintain library of academic courseware Program assessing the impact of IT on instruction Policy regarding ownership of Web-based resources developed by faculty Program to provide supplemental IT training for IT staff Assess impact of IT on instructional services and academic programs ADA-compliant Web pages Does your institution have a strategic plan for: Information technology? no currently preparing a plan yes Electronic commerce? no currently preparing a plan yes Distance education? no currently preparing a plan yes Campus portal services? no currently preparing a plan yes Wireless networks? no currently preparing a plan yes Deploying course management tools? no currently preparing a plan yes Has your institution established a single product standard for: Desktop/notebook computer operating system No Macintosh Win 95/98 Win NT Workstation Win 2000 Desktop/notebook product or manufacturer No Apple Compaq Dell Gateway HP IBM Other Groupware No Lotus Notes Microsoft Exchange Novell Groupwise Other Course management system No Blackboard eCollege Lotus Learning Space Prometheus WebCT Other

Master I Public

Master II Public

50.0 81.8 95.5 59.1 45.5 81.8 90.9 40.9 40.9 45.5 31.8 59.1 40.9 59.1 68.2 45.5 77.3

49.4 74.7 92.0 62.1 50.6 83.9 81.4 43.7 56.3 47.6 21.8 38.4 27.6 60.5 51.7 35.6 64.0

57.1 85.7 71.4 57.1 28.6 66.7 71.4 42.9 42.9 42.9 14.3 28.6 28.6 57.1 71.4 57.1 100.0

18.2 27.3 54.6 54.6 40.9 4.6 31.8 45.5 22.7 22.7 40.9 22.7 50.0 27.3 18.2 27.3 54.6

5.8 24.4 69.8 55.8 29.1 15.1 26.4 27.6 46.0 43.7 29.9 26.4 35.6 42.5 21.8 25.3 16.1 58.6

14.3 85.7 85.7 14.3 57.1 14.3 28.6 71.4 14.3 14.3 28.6 42.9 28.6 42.9 42.9 14.3

95.2 4.8 95.2 4.8 72.7 27.3 40.9 31.8 27.3 -

81.2 2.4 10.6 5.9 77.7 2.4 1.2 11.8 3.5 1.2 2.4 57.5 3.5 24.1 10.3

57.1 14.3 28.6 57.1 28.6 14.3 42.9 42.9 14.3

20.7 37.9 1.2 2.3 34.5 3.5

28.6 14.3 14.3 42.9 -

page 3

CAMPUS COMPUTING 2001 Special Analysis for the CSU System

CSU System What academic resources/services are on your WWW site?* Undergraduate admissions applications Financial aid application Current course catalog Program/major/degree requirements Course registration Course add/drop options E-commerce (fee payments, etc.) On-line courses (i.e., full course online) Library/card catalog Interlibrary loan services Journals and reference resources Course reserves Student transcripts IT support resources IT training/tutorials Instructional software Faculty/staff directory Student newspaper Student handbook Athletic event schedule Alumni information/services Press releases/media services Campus book store Personalized student calendar Percentages by campus category. *Columns may not total 100% since responses are not mutually exclusive. FUTURE ISSUES AFFECTING CAMPUS COMPUTING How important are the following to campus computing/IT planning over the next 2-3 years? Operating system/interface/development Windows 95/98/ME Windows NT Server Windows 2000 Desktop Windows 2000 Server Windows XP Macintosh OS X Macintosh OS X server Solaris Unix Linux (desktop/client) Linux (server) Hardware Notebook computers Macintosh computers Unix workstations Network computers PDAs/handheld computers Smart Cards DVD Instructional applications and resources Developing instructional software Using instructional software in classes Using instructional software as a supplement to class Computer-based classroom presentation facilities Internet resources for instruction Web pages for classes Web-based tutorials e-Books (e-Textbooks) Networking & Internet/WWW issues & resources Merging data & telecommunications networks Wireless networks Voice over IP Bluetooth Lotus Notes Microsoft Exchange Java XML Shockwave Quicktime Real Player Microsoft Media Player Gigabit Ethernet ATM Adobe Acrobat Microsoft Reader Internet 2 Internet videoconferencing Network security E-commerce on the Web Open source software Student portal services IMS standards Course management software User Support Services/Campus IT Services On-line IT training On-line technical support Advertising on the student portal site Computer repair services Alumni services via the campus web site Mean ratings by campus category Scale from 1="Not Important" to 7="Very Important". 95.5 63.6 100.0 81.8 59.1 59.1 54.5 86.4 90.9 68.2 90.9 40.9 27.3 81.8 86.4 68.2 86.4 77.3 40.9 90.9 77.3 86.4 81.8 9.1

Master I Public 90.8 62.1 96.6 90.8 74.7 67.8 48.3 88.5 95.4 80.5 88.5 41.4 52.9 83.9 73.6 67.8 94.3 59.8 54.0 87.4 75.9 79.3 71.3 17.2

Master II Public 100.0 71.4 85.7 71.4 57.1 57.1 28.6 85.7 100.0 85.7 85.7 28.6 42.9 71.4 71.4 57.1 100.0 28.6 71.4 85.7 71.4 100.0 71.4 28.6

3.0 4.4 5.6 5.7 4.3 4.3 3.6 4.5 5.1 3.6 3.9 5.8 4.2 3.8 2.8 4.3 4.0 4.0 5.3 6.0 6.0 6.2 6.0 6.0 5.7 4.8 5.8 6.1 4.8 3.1 2.0 4.4 5.1 4.9 4.3 4.4 4.7 4.5 6.4 3.8 5.1 3.7 5.1 5.6 6.5 5.5 4.7 5.4 4.7 5.9 5.1 5.3 2.6 4.1 4.5

3.6 4.2 5.8 5.7 4.6 4.3 3.4 3.8 4.5 3.6 4.1 5.7 4.1 3.5 3.2 4.5 4.1 4.2 5.2 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.4 6.1 5.8 4.5 5.0 5.7 4.6 3.4 1.9 4.0 5.0 4.9 4.1 4.4 4.9 4.8 6.0 4.1 5.5 3.7 5.0 5.6 6.6 5.7 4.6 5.6 4.7 6.0 5.2 5.6 3.1 4.8 4.9

3.4 4.0 6.0 5.7 4.6 4.3 3.0 2.9 3.9 2.7 2.7 5.4 4.9 3.3 3.7 4.0 4.1 4.6 4.7 6.0 6.0 5.9 6.1 6.3 5.0 4.0 4.9 5.9 5.0 3.1 1.4 5.1 4.9 5.0 4.3 4.6 4.9 4.6 5.6 3.4 5.6 4.4 4.1 5.3 6.6 5.1 3.6 5.7 4.4 5.6 5.4 5.9 4.4 5.4 5.3

page 4

CAMPUS COMPUTING 2001 Special Analysis for the CSU System

CSU System RATING THE TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE Computer networks and data communication Telecommunications and phone system Wireless networks User support services On-line reference resources in campus library/library system Web resources to support instruction E-commerce capacity Campus web site services/student portal Network security against hackers and virus attacks IT training for faculty IT training for students Mean rating by campus category. Scale from 1="Poor" to 7="Excellent". ADDRESSING BUDGET ISSUES BY: Reducing purchases of computer technology Doing this already Beginning in 2001-02 Reviewing for 2001-02 Decided not to do Charging fees to departments and service units Doing this already Beginning in 2001-02 Reviewing for 2001-02 Decided not to do Requiring a computer/IT fee for all students Doing this already Beginning in 2001-02 Reviewing for 2001-02 Decided not to do Leasing rather than buying hardware Doing this already Beginning in 2001-02 Reviewing for 2001-02 Decided not to do More active recycling of older equipment Doing this already Beginning in 2001-02 Reviewing for 2001-02 Decided not to do Vendor financing Doing this already Beginning in 2001-02 Reviewing for 2001-02 Decided not to do Reducing hours in public access facilities Doing this already Beginning in 2001-02 Reviewing for 2001-02 Decided not to do Reducing services Doing this already Beginning in 2001-02 Reviewing for 2001-02 Decided not to do Reorganizing operations Doing this already Beginning in 2001-02 Reviewing for 2001-02 Decided not to do Reducing staff Doing this already Beginning in 2001-02 Reviewing for 2001-02 Decided not to do Using information technology to reduce instructional costs Doing this already Beginning in 2001-02 Reviewing for 2001-02 Decided not to do Making greater use of student assistants Doing this already Beginning in 2000-01 Reviewing for 2000-01 Decided not to do Outsourcing Internet access to commercial providers Doing this already Beginning in 2000-01 Reviewing for 2000-01 Decided not to do Outsourcing computing services to commercial providers Doing this already Beginning in 2000-01 Reviewing for 2000-01 Decided not to do Outsourcing student portal services to commercial providers Doing this already Beginning in 2000-01 Reviewing for 2000-01 Decided not to do Percentages by campus category.

Master I Public

Master II Public

5.8 5.5 3.9 5.0 5.6 5.2 3.9 4.2 4.8 4.6 4.5

5.9 5.6 3.3 5.2 5.7 5.2 3.6 4.5 4.9 4.7 4.1

6.1 4.7 4.3 5.4 5.9 4.9 3.0 3.1 5.7 4.6 4.7

13.6 4.6 13.6 68.2 33.3 4.8 14.3 47.6 4.6 22.7 72.7 19.1 9.5 71.4 59.1 4.6 4.6 31.8 9.1 68.2 4.8 4.8 4.8 85.7 13.6 86.4 40.9 4.6 9.1 45.5 4.8 95.2 47.6 4.8 28.6 19.1 90.5 4.8 4.8 9.5 4.8 9.5 76.2 18.2 4.6 4.6 72.7 4.6 9.1 86.4

9.2 14.9 75.9 25.6 1.2 15.1 58.1 57.0 17.4 25.6 12.9 1.2 18.8 67.1 81.6 1.2 5.8 11.5 13.1 1.2 11.9 73.8 5.8 4.7 89.5 5.8 7.0 87.2 46.5 10.5 16.3 26.7 3.7 1.2 4.9 90.1 44.1 2.4 32.1 21.4 90.7 1.2 2.3 5.8 29.4 2.4 7.1 61.2 10.5 1.2 8.1 80.2 5.8 1.2 22.1 70.9

16.7 16.7 66.7 33.3 16.7 50.0 71.4 14.3 14.3 28.6 71.4 66.7 33.3 16.7 16.7 66.7 100.0 14.3 85.7 66.7 33.3 14.3 14.3 71.4 50.0 16.7 16.7 16.7 76.3 16.7 28.6 14.3 57.1 100.0 16.7 16.7 66.7

page 5

CAMPUS COMPUTING 2001 Special Analysis for the CSU System

CSU System STRATEGIC, BUDGET AND PERSONNEL ISSUES* Assessing benefits of current investment Clarifying goals and campus plans for technology resources Providing incentives for faculty to use technology Allocating funds to support expanded services Faculty concerns about benefits of computing in the curriculum Administrative concerns about benefits of computing in the curriculum Developing/strengthening vendor relationships Charging fees to students for computer/network access Establishing/maintaining campus-wide hardware standards Establishing/maintaining campus-wide software standards Operating a computer resale program Developing budget model to replace aging equipment Using Internet/Web resources in instruction Using technology based commercial curriculum products Using IT to enhance distance education program Negotiating site licensing with textbook publishers Negotiating site licensing with academic publishers Sharing digital resources with other campuses/institutions Developing campus policies for Web-based intellectual property Helping IT personnel stay current with new technologies Retaining current IT personnel, given off-campus competition Electronic commerce Web-based instructional/course management systems Acquiring IT resources via corporate grants from key vendors Providing a "campus portal" for Web-based student services Moving more of our user support services to the Web Surveying student and faculty about IT issues and services Deploying CRM software Mean ratings by campus category. Scale from 1="Not Important" to 7="Very Important". THIS YEAR'S COMPUTING BUDGET COMPARED TO LAST YEAR'S Total academic computing budget Reduced >5% Reduced 3-5% Reduced 1-3% No change Increased 1-3% Increased 3-5% Increased >5% Total administrative computing budget Reduced >5% Reduced 3-5% Reduced 1-3% No change Increased 1-3% Increased 3-5% Increased >5% Purchases of computers by academic computing units Reduced >5% Reduced 3-5% Reduced 1-3% No change Increased 1-3% Increased 3-5% Increased >5% Purchases of computers by administrative computing units Reduced >5% Reduced 3-5% Reduced 1-3% No change Increased 1-3% Increased 3-5% Increased >5% All institutional purchases of desktop/notebook computers Reduced >5% Reduced 3-5% Reduced 1-3% No change Increased 1-3% Increased 3-5% Increased >5% Network servers Reduced >5% Reduced 3-5% Reduced 1-3% No change Increased 1-3% Increased 3-5% Increased >5% Server software and related services Reduced >5% Reduced 3-5% Reduced 1-3% No change Increased 1-3% Increased 3-5% Increased >5% User training and support Reduced >5% Reduced 3-5% Reduced 1-3% No change Increased 1-3% Increased 3-5% Increased >5% Percentages by campus category 5.7 6.1 5.3 5.8 5.1 4.9 4.7 4.0 5.3 5.6 3.2 5.6 6.0 4.7 5.9 4.4 4.4 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.0 4.7 6.0 4.9 5.8 5.9 5.4 4.3

Master I Public 5.6 6.2 5.3 5.7 4.8 4.5 4.6 4.6 5.5 5.7 3.3 5.8 6.2 4.9 5.9 4.2 4.2 5.1 5.6 6.3 6.2 5.0 6.2 5.0 5.6 5.6 5.4 3.9

Master II Public 5.7 5.1 5.1 5.4 5.0 4.6 4.0 5.0 5.6 5.6 2.9 5.9 5.4 5.4 5.6 3.7 3.7 3.9 5.0 6.1 5.9 4.8 5.1 5.0 6.0 5.6 5.7 4.6

4.6 36.4 36.4 13.6 9.1 27.3 18.2 18.2 36.4 9.1 50.0 13.6 13.6 13.6 4.6 59.1 13.6 4.6 18.2 9.1 50.0 18.2 13.6 9.1 0.0 0.0 4.6 36.4 40.9 18.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.6 31.8 45.5 18.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.6 36.4 40.9 9.1 9.1

2.3 4.7 8.1 38.4 20.9 17.4 8.1 2.4 7.1 8.2 34.1 17.7 11.8 18.8 4.7 4.7 3.5 47.7 23.3 9.3 7.0 3.5 3.5 5.8 50.0 26.7 4.7 5.8 3.5 4.6 4.6 43.7 23.0 13.8 6.9 1.2 2.3 1.2 39.5 33.7 15.1 7.0 1.2 2.3 42.5 32.2 13.8 8.1 1.2 3.5 1.2 44.2 23.3 14.0 12.8

100.0 57.1 14.3 28.6 14.3 71.4 14.3 85.7 14.3 14.3 71.4 14.3 14.3 85.7 14.3 85.7 85.7 14.3

page 6

CAMPUS COMPUTING 2001 Special Analysis for the CSU System

CSU System THE TECHNOLOGY BUDGET Percentage institutions experiencing computing budget cut, 2000-01 Percentage of budget that was cut Total academic computing budget 2001-02 (in thousands $$) Percent of budget allocated to: Hardware Content licenses Software User support Personnel Network service/support
Note: numbers may not equal 100% because of overlapping budget categories)

Master I Public 6.9 4.4 2,524 21.9 6.1 12.6 21.6 53.6 14.0

Master II Public . 1,571 19.1 19.1 19.1 19.1 19.1 19.1

. 558 18.4 3.9 10.6 17.5 61.2 9.2

Academic Computing as an estimated pct of total campus IT spending Current replacement cycle for desktop/notebook computers (years) Student labs 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years Faculty offices 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years Administrative offices 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years Means and percentages by campus category. WEB AND NETWORKING ISSUES How important are the following issues on your campus?* Supporting instructional labs & clusters Creating Web pages for dept. use and course resources Web/Network access for all students Managing dial-up access from off campus users Network printing Digital image libraries/archives Creating plug & play network for notebook computer users Network computers/thin client computing strategies Network security ATM Gigabit ethernet Electronic commerce Wireless networks e-mail accounts for alumni User privacy Making campus networks accessible to PDA devices Primary medium for campus backbone/network Linking buildings Fiber Gigabit Ethernet Std. Ethernet/Coax Twisted pair Other None Within buildings Fiber Gigabit Ethernet Std. Ethernet/Coax Twisted pair Other None How well developed are network connections and instructional infrastructure? Percentage of faculty connected to the campus network/have Internet access Percentage of classrooms connected to the campus network/have Internet access Percentage of classrooms with fixed computer projection capacity Percentage of dormitory beds with network connection Percentage of campus covered/served by wireless network access Mean ratings and percentages by campus category. *Scale from 1='Not Important" to 7="Very Important". +Columns may not total 100% since responses are not mutually exclusive.

27.9

41.0

39.2

4.8 61.9 19.1 14.3 57.1 38.1 4.8 71.4 19.1 9.5

8.1 57.0 25.6 9.3 1.2 45.9 40.0 12.9 1.2 1.2 47.1 37.7 12.9

14.3 14.3 57.1 14.3 14.3 57.1 14.3 14.3 14.3 57.1 28.6 -

6.1 5.5 5.9 4.1 4.9 4.7 4.7 3.5 6.5 3.0 6.1 4.5 5.7 4.1 5.4 4.3

6.3 5.3 6.0 3.7 4.9 4.6 4.5 3.3 6.5 3.5 5.7 4.8 5.2 3.6 5.5 4.3

6.4 4.6 4.7 4.1 5.4 5.1 4.3 3.7 5.7 4.6 5.6 5.3 5.6 2.4 5.9 3.7

86.4 9.1 4.6 23.8 9.5 28.6 38.1 98.4 75.0 30.4 77.9 11.5

86.1 12.8 1.2 11.8 12.9 25.9 48.2 1.2 98.7 77.1 24.1 82.8 7.6

85.7 14.3 14.3 42.9 42.9 99.0 70.3 39.3 81.0 20.0

page 7

CAMPUS COMPUTING 2001 Special Analysis for the CSU System

CSU System Current transmission capacity of your campus network High speed video Functional now Coming A/Y 2001-02 Scheduled for A/Y 2002-03 Not applicable ATM Functional now Coming A/Y 2001-02 Scheduled for A/Y 2002-03 Not applicable Local area wireless networks Functional now Coming A/Y 2001-02 Scheduled for A/Y 2002-03 Not applicable Full campus wireless networks Functional now Coming A/Y 2001-02 Scheduled for A/Y 2002-03 Not applicable Gigabit Ethernet Functional now Coming A/Y 2001-02 Scheduled for A/Y 2002-03 Not applicable Voice over IP Functional now Coming A/Y 2001-02 Scheduled for A/Y 2002-03 Not applicable Does your institution provide off-campus dial-up (ISP) services for: Students No Yes, without a fee Yes, for a fee Faculty No Yes, without a fee Yes, for a fee Number of dial-up modem ports available for student use Number of "plug & play" ports on campus for mobile computer users Means and percentages by campus category.

Master I Public

Master II Public

70.0 15.0 15.0 42.9 4.8 52.4 47.6 28.6 14.3 9.5 10.5 42.1 47.4 45.5 13.6 36.4 4.6 10.0 40.0 50.0

61.3 7.5 13.8 17.5 51.8 3.6 1.2 43.4 56.6 22.9 9.6 10.8 7.9 6.6 29.0 56.6 51.2 13.1 21.4 14.3 4.9 4.9 32.9 57.3

28.6 14.3 57.1 16.7 83.3 71.4 28.6 20.0 60.0 20.0 50.0 50.0 16.7 83.3

33.3 47.6 19.1 18.8 68.8 12.5 165.1 302.4

48.8 39.3 11.9 37.1 54.3 8.6 107.4 197.0

57.1 28.6 14.3 50.0 33.3 16.7 31.5 17.5

page 8

CAMPUS COMPUTING 2001 Special Analysis for the CSU System

CSU System ORGANIZATION, PLANNING AND IMPACT ISSUES Is your campus part of a multicampus system with shared computing resources? Academic and administrative computing are: Separate units One single unit Has your institution reorganized IS units in past 2 years?* Academic computing Administrative computing Libraries Do you anticipate a reorganization of IS in the next 2 years?* Academic computing Administrative computing Libraries The heads of the academic and administrative units report to: Academic computing President Provost CIO or CTO Other vice provost/vice president Dean Administrative computing President Provost CIO or CTO Other vice provost/vice president Dean Libraries President Provost CIO or CTO Other vice provost/vice president Dean Does institution have a chief information/technology officer? No Currently under discussion Yes What academic and operational units report to the CIO/CTO?* Academic computing Administrative computing Libraries Telecommunications Who provides tech support for most departmental computer labs? Individual department Central IT service unit Both Who makes decisions about selecting course management products? Individual department Central IT service unit Both How does your institution deal with the "life cycle"? One time allocation Developing budget Have budget Means and percentages by campus category. 81.8 45.5 54.6 33.3 22.7 14.3 40.9 22.7 9.5

Master I Public 62.8 32.6 67.4 33.3 31.0 9.8 32.9 34.1 11.0

Master II Public 42.9 42.9 57.1 14.3 14.3 14.3 14.3 14.3

31.8 54.6 13.6 18.2 63.6 18.2 77.3 13.6 4.6 4.6 63.6 18.2 72.7 90.9 13.6 77.3 45.5 36.4 18.2 18.2 36.4 45.5 13.6 31.8 54.6

8.1 26.4 42.5 20.7 2.3 7.0 15.1 50.0 26.7 1.2 77.0 6.9 10.3 5.8 18.4 6.9 74.7 64.4 71.3 8.0 62.1 25.3 48.3 26.4 14.6 50.0 35.4 17.4 31.4 51.2

85.7 14.3 14.3 85.7 42.9 42.9 14.3 14.3 85.7 85.7 85.7 42.9 85.7 42.9 57.1 14.3 42.9 42.9 57.1 42.9

page 9

CAMPUS COMPUTING 2001 Special Analysis for the CSU System

CSU System ORGANIZATION, PLANNING AND IMPACT ISSUES (continued) How well does your institution prepare students for the technology skills needed over the next decade? Academic field/program Biological and physical sciences Business Education Engineering Fine/performing arts Humanities Mathematics Social science Occupational programs Overall campus preparation How well prepared are faculty to use technology as a resource? For instruction Biological and physical sciences Business Education Engineering Fine/performing arts Humanities Mathematics Social science Occupational programs Overall campus preparation For scholarship & research Biological and physical sciences Business Education Engineering Fine/performing arts Humanities Mathematics Social science Occupational programs Overall campus preparation Internet & Web resources Biological and physical sciences Business Education Engineering Fine/performing arts Humanities Mathematics Social science Occupational programs Overall campus preparation Means by campus category. Scale from 1="Poor" to 5="Excellent". USES OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY How strongly do you agree or strongly agree:* Faculty have unreasonable expectations about user support Technology has improved instruction on my campus We plan to require all students to own a computer by Fall 2003 Access to Internet 2 by Fall 2002 is essential to long-term needs Colleges should permit commercial advertising on campus web sites/portals Our adm. systems provide effective support for conducting college business My campus does a good job of planning our short- and mid- range tech. Needs The single most important IT issue for my campus over the next 2 or 3 years is: Provide online/distance education via the web Providing adequate user support Assist faculty integrate technology into instruction Financing replacement of aging hardware/software Moving toward campus-wide wireless networks Integrating academic and administrative computing Providing student portal services Integrating eCommerce into campus services Hiring/retaining qualified IT staff Upgrading/replacing administrative IT/ERP systems Means by campus category. *Scale from 1="Strongly Disagree" to 4="Strongly Agree".

Master I Public

Master II Public ORGANIZATION, PLANNING AND IMPACT ISSUES (continued)

4.0 4.4 3.9 4.4 3.7 3.6 4.0 3.8 3.9 3.9

3.8 4.1 3.7 3.9 3.3 3.2 3.7 3.5 3.6 3.7

3.6 3.9 3.1 3.5 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.4 3.6 3.3

3.9 4.0 3.6 4.2 3.4 3.2 3.8 3.6 3.6 3.7 4.1 4.0 3.5 4.3 3.3 3.3 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.7 4.1 4.0 3.6 4.0 3.4 3.3 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.8

3.7 3.9 3.6 3.8 3.2 3.1 3.6 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.8 3.8 3.5 3.7 3.1 3.2 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.5 3.9 4.0 3.7 3.9 3.3 3.4 3.7 3.5 3.6 3.7

3.4 3.3 2.9 3.0 2.7 2.9 3.0 3.1 2.9 3.0 3.9 3.3 2.4 3.2 2.7 2.7 3.1 2.9 2.7 3.0 3.9 3.4 3.1 3.3 3.0 3.3 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.4

54.5 95.5 22.7 54.5 13.6 86.4 77.3

72.1 1,392.1 58.6 10.2 83.0 14.6 1,104.1

71.0 287.1 30.7 20.1 62.0 10.7 286.0

9.1 18.2 22.7 4.6 4.6 4.6 13.6 9.1 13.6

7.1 20.0 22.4 11.8 3.5 4.7 2.4 14.1 14.1

28.6 14.3 14.3 42.9

page 10