Docstoc

NHMFL_Publication-3153

Document Sample
NHMFL_Publication-3153 Powered By Docstoc
					0                                                                   Brazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 33, no. 4, December, 2003




        Anomalous Effects of Two Gap Superconductivity in M gB2
                                                           A. Gurevich
                      Applied Superconductivity Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA

                                                     Received on 23 May, 2003.

             In this paper a brief overview of anomalous behavior resulting from the two-gap superconductivity in M gB2
             is given. We focus on two characteristic effects: an anomalous enhancement of the upper critical field by
             nonmagnetic impurities and nonequilibrium interband phase textures which appear as a result of interband
             breakdown caused by electric field. Both effects distinguish M gB2 from the existing low-Tc and high-Tc
             superconductors.




                                                                                                      ||
1 Introduction                                                                ⊥
                                                                     fields Hc2 (0) 3 − 5T and Hc2 (0) 15 − 19T of M gB2
                                                                     single crystals [3, 10], where ⊥ and || correspond to H per-
The discovery of the two-gap superconductivity in M gB2 [1,          pendicular and parallel to the ab plane. As far as Hc2 is
2, 3] (and perhaps in N bSe2 [4]) has brought to focus new           concerned, it can be increased by nonmagnetic impurities,
effects of unconventional pairing and multicomponent order           following the well-known route for dirty one-gap supercon-
parameters ψ with internal degrees of freedom [5, 6]. In             ductors in which the zero-temperature Hc2 (0) and the slope
particular, M gB2 has two different s-wave superconducting           Hc2 = dHc2 /dT at Tc are increased proportionally to the
gaps ∆σ (0) ≈ 7.2mV and ∆π (0) ≈ 2.3mV residing on dis-              normal state residual resistivity ρ:
connected sheets of the Fermi surface (FS), which comprises
nearly cylindrical 2D parts formed by in-plane σ antibond-              Hc2 (0) = 0.69Tc Hc2 ,        Hc2 = 4eckB NF ρ/π,      (1)
ing pxy orbitals of B, and a more isotropic 3D tubular net-
work formed by out-of-plane π bonding and antibonding pz             where NF is the density of states at the FS and −e is the
orbitals of B. For two weakly coupled s-wave order param-            electron charge. The same approach has also been applied
eters ψ1 = ∆1 eiθ1 and ψ2 = ∆2 eiθ2 , the internal degree of         to M gB2 in which scattering was introduced by irradiation
freedom is the interband phase difference θ(r, t) = θ1 − θ2 .        or atomic substitutions on both B and Mg sites [3]. For
In this case, in addition to the phase-locked states (θ = 0, π),     instance, in c-axis oriented M gB2 films [11], ρ was in-
peculiar phase textures θ(r, t) and collective modes [5] oc-         creased from ∼ 1µΩcm to more than 200µΩcm, resulting
cur.                                                                 in Hc2⊥ ≈ 1T/K and Hc2 ≈ 1.8T/K, while reducing Tc
     This paper addresses new electromagnetic effects, which         down to ≈ 31K. Based on these numbers, the extrapola-
                                                                                       ⊥
principally result from the two-band superconductivity,              tion (1) gives Hc2 (0) ≈ 20T, still below Hc2 (0) ≈ 30T of
making M gB2 unique among the existing superconductors.              N b3 Sn. However, Eq. (1) significantly underestimates the
Such effects manifest themselves in the following areas: 1.          actual Hc2 in two-gap superconductors, thus Hc2 of M gB2
High-field superconductivity in dirty two-gap superconduc-            can exceed Hc2 (0) of N b3 Sn even for Hc2⊥ ≈ 1T/K which
tors due to their anomalous response to nonmagnetic im-              have already been achieved[11, 8].
purities. [7] This makes it possible to greatly increase the             The Fermi surface of M gB2 provides three different im-
upper critical field Hc2 by alloying M gB2 and optimizing             purity scattering channels: intraband scattering within σ and
the ratio of intraband scattering rates, as has already been         π FS sheets, and interband scattering. Intraband scattering
observed. [8] 2. Interband tunneling and intrinsic Joseph-           reduces the intrinsic anisotropy of ∆σ and ∆π with no effect
son effect, which give rise to dislocation-like phase textures       of Tc , while the pairbreaking effect of interband scattering
in the order parameter, and interband breakdown caused by            is weak due to orthogonality of σ and π orbitals[12]. The
the electric field. [9] These textures manifest themselves in         multiple scattering channels provide the essential flexibility
new effects in nonlinear electromagnetic response.                   to increase the Hc2 of M gB2 to a much greater extent than
                                                                     in one-gap superconductors not only by the usual increase of
                                                                     ρ, but also by optimizing relative weights of σ and π scatter-
2 High-field superconductivity                                        ing rates by selective atomic substitution on B and Mg sites.
                                                                     This follows from recent calculations of Hc2 from the Us-
So far all attempts to increase Tc of M gB2 by doping have           adel equations in which all scattering channels in M gB2 are
                                                                                                                            αβ
been unsuccessful, while the significant potential of M gB2           accounted for via the electron diffusivity tensors Dm for
for applications is still limited by rather low upper critical       each m-th FS sheet and the interband scattering rates γmm .
A. Gurevich                                                                                                                                    1


The Usadel equations for two-gap superconductors are: [7]        measurements of Hc2 (T ) on resistive 220µΩcm c-axis ori-
                                                                 ented film [8], which has very high Hc2 (T ) exceeding Hc2
          1 αβ                                                   of N b3 Sn. The fit in Figs. 2 and 3 also revealed that the π
     ωf1 − D1 [g1 Πα Πβ f1 − f1 α β g1 ] =
          2                                                      band is this film is much dirtier (Dπ     0.1Dσ ) than the σ
              ψ1 g1 + γ12 (g1 f2 − g2 f1 )                (2)    band, which may be due to distorted and buckled Mg sub-
          1 αβ                                                   lattice [16].
     ωf2 − D2 [g2 Πα Πβ f2 − f2 α β g2 ] =
          2
             ψ2 g2 + γ21 (g2 f1 − g1 f2 ),                (3)
                                                                                     35
Eqs. (2) and (3) are supplemented by the self-consistency
                                                                                                                                    (a)
equations for the order parameters ψm = ∆m exp(iθm ),
                                                                                                              MgB
                        ωD
                                                                                     30                          2
                                                                                                              220 µΩ cm
                                                                                                                              H ⊥ ab
            ψm = 2πT             λmm fm (r, ω),           (4)                        25
                        ω>0 m




                                                                    H⊥ , Tesla
                                                                                     20
                2
Here |fm |2 + gm = 1, the band index m runs from 1 and
2, Nm is the partial density of states, Π = + 2πiA/φ0 ,




                                                                            c2
                                                                                     15
A is the vector potential, φ0 is the flux quantum, and ω =
πT (2n + 1), n = 0, ±1, ..., and the matrix elements of the                                  MgB2
                                                                                     10
BCS coupling constants λmm are given by λσσ ≈ 0.81,                                          7 µΩ cm
λππ ≈ 0.285, λσπ ≈ 0.119, and λπσ ≈ 0.09 [13] (the in-
                                                                                      5
dices 1 and 2 correspond to σ and π bands, respectively).                                      MgB2 single crystal

The Usadel equations were recently used to calculate vor-
                                                  αβ                                  0
tices in M gB2 .[14] The values of γmm and Dm can be                                   0               10            20      30           40
either calculated from first principles or extracted from the                                                     T, Kelvin
observed Hc2 (T ) and ρ(T ) curves [7]. For the 2D σ band,
                        (c)
the principal value Dσ along the c-axis is much smaller                                                    ⊥
                                                                 Figure 1. Temperature dependence of Hc2 (T ). The data
                     (a)      (b)                         αβ
than the in-plane Dσ and Dσ , but the anisotropy in Dπ           points show experimental data for dirty 220µΩcm film and
for the 3D π-band is much weaker.                                epitaxial M gB2 film [8], and the solid curve is calculated
                                                                                    (ab)          (ab)
    Solving Eqs. (2)-(4) [7, 14] for γmm = 0, yields the         from Eq. (5) with Dπ = 0.12Dσ .
                            ⊥
following equation for Hc2 :

              a0 [ln t + U (h/t)][ln t + U (ηh/t)] +
                                                                                 50
   a2 [ln t + U (ηh/t)] + a1 [ln t + U (h/t)] = 0,        (5)                                                                     (b)
                                                                                 45                              MgB2

where a1 = 1 + λ− /λ0 , a2 = 1 − λ− /λ0 , a0 = 2w/λ0 ,                                                           220 µΩ cm    H || ab
                                                                                 40
λ0 = (λ2 + 4λ12 λ21 )1/2 , λ± = λ11 ± λ22 , w = λ11 λ22 −
          −
λ12 λ21 , η = D2 /D1 , h = Hc2 D1 /2φ0 Tc , t = T /Tc ,                          35
and ψ(x) is the di-gamma function. For equal diffusivities,                      30
                                                                       H|| , Tesla




η = 1, Eq. (5) reduces to the one-gap Maki-deGennes equa-
tion ln t + U (h/t) = 0. To account for the dependence of                        25
                                                                                                                             MgB2
                                                                        c2




Hc2 (θ) on the angle between H and the c-axis, D1 and D2                         20                                          7 µΩ cm
in Eq. (5) should be replaced by the angular dependent dif-
                                                                                 15
fusivities D1 (θ) and D2 (θ) for both bands [7]:
                                                                                 10        MgB2 single crystal
      Dm (θ) = [Dm cos2 θ + Dm Dm sin2 θ]1/2
                 (a)2        (a) (c)
                                                          (6)
                                                                                     5

    Eqs. (5) and (6) describe a rather anomalous behavior,                           0
                                                                                      0             10               20      30           40
depending on the material parameter η = D1 /D2 which                                                        T, Kelvin
can be varied by disordering either B or Mg sublattices. In
the case of large difference between D1 and D2 , the de-
pendence Hc2 (T ) can exhibit a significant upward curva-         Figure 2. Temperature dependence of Hc2 (T ). The data
ture, because the slope Hc2 at Tc is inversely proportional to   points show experimental data for dirty 220µΩcm film
the maximum diffusivity, while Hc2 (0) is inversely propor-      and epitaxial M gB2 film [8], and the solid curve is cal-
                                                                                                         (c) (ab)
tional to the minimum diffusivity. Thus, Hc2 (0) can be much     culated from Eqs. (5) and (6) with [Dπ Dπ ]1/2 =
                                                                       (c) (ab)
higher than the one-gap extrapolation (1) suggests. Figs. 1      0.2[Dσ Dσ ]1/2 .
and 2 show good fit of Eqs. (5) and (6) to pulse high-field
2                                                                               Brazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 33, no. 4, December, 2003

                                                                                                                                          αβ
                  6                                                             For M gB2 , the tensor Λ−2 is a sum of the diffusivities D1
                                                                                                        αβ
                                                                                       αβ
                 5.5            1                                               and D2 with markedly different anisotropies and absolute
                                                                                values. Thus, Λαβ is always limited by the cleanest band
                  5
                                                                                with the maximum diffusivity, so the ratio Hc1 (θ)/Hc2 (θ)
                 4.5                                                            not only becomes dependent on the field orientation, but its
                  4                                                             angular dependence turns out to be different at different T.
       Hc2/Hc2




                                                                                    The two-band superconductivity in M gB2 provides a
      ⊥




                 3.5
                                                                                new way to boost Hc2 , because a higher Hc2 (0) is possible
      ||




                  3                                                             for a given slope Hc2 at Tc . For example, if Hc2 = 1T /K
                 2.5
                                                                                and Tc = 40 K, the theory predicts Hc2 (0) >40 Tesla,
                                                                                which exceeds Hc2 (0) of N b3 Sn, even though Hc2 is still
                  2             2                                               smaller than 2 T/K characteristic of many low-Tc and high-
                 1.5                                                            Tc materials. For Hc2 = 1T /K, the shortest GL in-plane
                                                                                coherence length ξ(0) = [φ0 /2πTc Hc2 ]1/2 ≈ 3 nm for the
                  1
                   0     0.2        0.4          0.6          0.8    1          σ band is still large enough to ensure no significant mag-
                                          T/Tc                                  netic granularity and weak link behavior at grain boundaries.
                                                                                Thus, there are no inherent limitations to further increase
Figure 3. Temperature dependence of the anisotropy pa-                          of Hc2 toward the high-Tc level of 2 T/K by proper alloy-
                     ⊥
rameter Hc2 (T )/Hc2 (T ). Solid squares and empty triangles                    ing or by quenched-in lattice disorder in M gB2 with the
correspond to the dirty 220µΩcm and the epitaxial M gB2                         account of its complex substitutional chemistry. [17] For
film, respectively. The curve 1 is calculated from Eqs. (5)                      Hc2 2T /K, the field Hc2 (0) would approach the param-
                (ab)         (c)        (ab)      (ab)
and (6) with Dσ       = 36Dσ , and Dπ        = 5Dσ , and                        agnetic limit of    70 Tesla, in which case a more general
             (ab)           (ab)       (ab)     (c)
curve 2 for Dπ = 0.09Dσ , and Dσ = 3Dσ                                          Eliashberg theory should be used to include strong coupling
                                                                                and spin effects.
     Eqs. (5) and (6) also describe an unusual temperature
                                                             ⊥
dependence of the anisotropy parameter γ(T ) = Hc2 /Hc2
different from the predictions of the anisotropic one-gap GL
theory in which γ(T ) =const. Because the 2D σ band in                          3 Intrinsic Josephson effect and inter-
                      (c)    (a)       (c)  (a)
M gB2 results in Dσ /Dσ              Dπ /Dπ , γ(T ) can ei-                       band phase textures
ther increase as T decreases if Dπ > Dσ , or decrease as
T decreases if Dπ       Dσ . The first case is characteristic of                 To calculate the interband phase textures θ(r, t), we derive
cleaner samples [10], whereas the second case was observed                      the equations of motion for θ and the electric field E at
on dirty films, as shown in Fig 3. The anisotropy of the lower                   T ≈ Tc from the time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau (TDGL)
critical field Hc1 (T ) is different from that of Hc2 (T ) [15],                                                                  ∗
                                                                                equations, Γm (∂t − 2πciϕ/φ0 )ψm = −δF/δψm . Here ϕ
as evident from the London penetration depth tensor Λαβ in                      is the electric potential, Γm are damping constants, and the
the dirty imit [7]:                                                             free energy F = d3 r(f1 + f2 + fm + fint ) contains the
                                                                                magnetic part fm = | × A|2 /8π, the GL intraband part
                 4π 2 e2     αβ      ∆1       αβ      ∆2
    Λ−2 =
     αβ             2
                         N1 D1 ∆1 th    + N2 D2 ∆2 th    . (7)                  fm , and the interband energy fint :
                   c                 2T               2T



                                                                                                      2
                                                                  βm                     2πi
                                          fm = αm |ψm |2 +            |ψm |4 + gm      +     A ψm ,                                         (8)
                                                                   2                     φ0
                                                                       ∗     ∗
                                                       fint   = γ(ψ1 ψ2 + ψ1 ψ2 )/2 = γ∆1 ∆2 cos θ,                                         (9)




The current density J is a sum of supercurrent and the nor-                         For weak interband coupling, γ     α1,2 , the gaps ∆1,2
mal current,                                                                    are not affected by the phase textures, in which case the
                                                                                equation of motion for θ = θ1 − θ2 become [9]
      Js = −8π 2 c(g1 ∆2 Q1 + g2 ∆2 Q2 )/φ2 + σE,
                       1          2       0                              (10)
where Qm = A − φ0 θm /2π, σ is the normal conductiv-                                         ˙
                                                                                         τ θ θ = L2   2
                                                                                                          θ + sign(γ) sin θ + αθ divJs ,   (11)
                                                                                                  θ
ity, and the supercurrent is a sum of independent intraband
contributions. Static Eqs. (8)-(10) were also derived from                      where the relaxation time τθ , the decay length Lθ , and the
the microscopic Usadel equations [7].                                           charge coupling parameter αθ are given in Ref. [9]. As
A. Gurevich                                                                                                                   3


follows from Eq. (11), the θ-mode does not contribute to         breakdown causes periodic generation of θ-solitons near the
the static magnetic response, since divJs = 0 for any dis-       current leads and penetration of phase textures in the bulk,
tribution of bulk supercurrents. However, the θ-mode inter-      as shown in Figs. 5,6. Here Jt = 2Lθ /αθ for Lθ     Le , and
acts with a nonuniform electric field due to nonequilibrium       Jt = Le /αθ tanh(a/Le ) for Lθ     Le [9].
charge imbalance, divJs = −σdivE. This happens near the
normal current leads, where the difference in the injected in-
traband charge densities provides the driving term αθ divE
in Eq. (11) due to the bands asymmetry, Γ1 g2 = Γ2 g1 .
Static distributions θ are described by the sine-Gordon equa-               80
                                                                                 θ
tion L2 2 θ = sign(−γ) sin θ, which has a single-soliton
       θ                                                                    60

or staircase solutions similar to the vortex solutions in long
                                                                            40
Josephson contacts [18]. However, these θ-solitons differ
from the Josephson vortices, because they do not carry mag-                 20

netic flux and do not interact with magnetic fields and su-                    0
                                                                          1500
percurrents, but can be driven by a nonequilibrium charge                                                              1
                                                                                 1000
density injected from normal electrodes. Thus, equilibrium
                                                                                 Time    500                0.5
nonuniform solutions θ(x) are always energetically unfa-                                       0   0       Distance
vorable as compared to the phase-locked states, θ = 0 for
γ < 0, or π for γ > 0, yet dynamic or quenched phase             Figure 5. Formation of a soliton chain in the right half
textures can be generated during current-induced interband       (0 < x < a) of the bridge of length 2a after J(t) was turned
breakdown.                                                       on from 0 to 1.025Jt at t = 0, and Le = a/10, Lθ = 0.1Le .
                                                                 Times and distances are normalized to τθ and a, respectively.

                               (a)
                N                           N

                                                                           80
                                                                                 θ
                               (b)                                         60


                                                                           40


                                                                           20
                               S
                                                                            0
                                                                             1000                                      1
                         (c)
                                                                                        500                 0.5
            N                                   N                                Time
                                                                                               0   0        Distance

                                                                 Figure 6. Moving soliton shuttle in the right half of the hori-
                                                                 zontal leg (0 < x < a) in the four-terminal geometry shown
Figure 4. Geometries in which the interband phase break-         in Fig. 4c. J(t) was turned on from 0 to 1.012Jt at t = 0,
down could occur. Here N labels normal electrodes, gray          and the rest is the same as in Fig. 5.
domains show phase solitons moving along thin arrows, and
block arrows indicate current directions. Static phase tex-
tures form in microbridges (a) and point contacts (b), while         Eqs. (11) and (12) were solved numerically for the
in the four-terminal geometry (c) the solitons and antisoli-     bridge (Fig. 4a) where E(x, t) and θ(x, t) are even and odd
tons continuously annihilate in the center.                      functions of x, respectively, E(±a, t) = E0 , E (0, t) = 0,
   The equation for E has the form [9]                           θ(0) = 0, θ (±a, t) = 0, and supercurrents in both bands
                                                                 vanish at the normal electrodes, J = σE. In this case θ-
         ˙                        ˙      ˙
      τe E + E − L2 graddivE + αe θ = τe J/σ,            (12)    solitons first appear at the bridge edges, but for J > Jt ,
                  e
                                                                 they are pushed to the bulk by the strong gradient of E(x).
where J(t) is the driving current density, Le is the electric    Then the next soliton forms near the edge and the process re-
field penetration depth, τe is the charging time constant ob-     peats periodically, resulting in the propagation of two soliton
                                              ˙
tained in Ref. [9], and the coupling term αe θ describes an      chains from the opposite current leads as shown in Fig. 5.
electric field caused by moving phase textures.                   After the first two solitons in the chains collide in the center
    Eqs. (11) and (12) which describe nonlinear electro-         they stop, while new solitons keep entering the bridge. Dur-
dynamics of a two-gap superconductor at fixed gaps ∆1,2                                                    ¯
                                                                 ing this soliton pileup, the mean slope θ (t) increases, reach-
were used to calculate θ(x, t) in a current-carrying micro-                            ¯
                                                                 ing a critical value θc      αθ J/L2 (for J       Jt ) at which
                                                                                                      θ
bridge of length 2a (Fig. 4). Below the critical current         the soliton generation at the edges stops and a static texture
density Jt the bridge is in a phase-locked state, except lo-                                                              ¯
                                                                 forms. During the soliton penetration, t < tc ∼ τθ aθc /2π,
calized phase kinks at the edges. For J > Jt , the interband     a transient resistance and voltage oscillations are generated.
4                                                                   Brazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 33, no. 4, December, 2003


A similar behavior occurs at the point contact (Fig. 4b),           the rf electric fileld E depends on the polarization of E: if
in which concentric soliton shells propagate into the bulk,         E(t) is parallel to the sample surface, then divE = 0, thus
forming a static structure.                                         the phase mode is not excited by the rf field. However, the
     A very different kind of soliton dynamics occurs in the        θ-mode contributes to the rf impedance if the rf field has a
4-terminal geometry (Fig. 4c), for which currents flow in            component perpendicular to the sample surface.
the opposite directions, making 90◦ turns around the cen-               Other interesting effects could occur in the point contact
tral stagnation point (x = 0) where θ = 0 by symmetry.              geometry (Fig. 4c) in which high current densities J ∼ Jt
In this case E(x) is an odd functions of x so the driving           near the contact (for example, an STM tip) can be achieved.
charge density divE does not change sign along the hori-            If the tip is perpendicular to the film surface of a c-axis
zontal leg of the cross in Fig. 4c, the total charge along          oriented film, then it mainly injects current into the 3D π
the horizontal leg is compensated by the opposite charge            band, because the c-axis tunneling into the 2D σ band is
distributed along the vertical leg. The asymmetry of E(x)           strongly suppressed. The resulting strong charge imbalance
causes generation of solitons and antisolitons at the oppo-         between σ and π bands greatly facilitates generation of con-
site current leads, which then move toward the center of the        centric soliton structures, which can be used to probe the
cross where they annihilate, as shown in Fig. 6. Such con-          interband breakdown with point contacts. If the currents are
tinuous soliton motion takes place if the width wy of the ver-      simultaneously injected from two point contacts and drained
tical leg is greater than the width wx of the horizontal leg,       into another current lead, the periodic voltage oscillations
so that the current density in the horizontal leg I/wx ex-          between the contacts occur in a way similar to the above-
ceeds Jt , while the vertical leg remains in the phase-locked       described oscillations in a mictobridge.
state I/wy < Jt , where I is the total sheet current. For               This work was supported by the NSF MRSEC (DMR
a      Le , the soliton-antisoliton annihilation in the center is   9214707), AFOSR MURI (F49620-01-1-0464).
unaffected by the charge imbalance near the current leads.
     Two different dynamic states represented in Figs. 5
and 6 have clear analogs in the theory of long Josephson            References
contacts. Namely the transient soliton penetration in the
                                                                     [1] J. Nagamatsu, N. Nakagawa, T. Muranaka, Y. Zenitani, and
bridge in Fig. 5 is analogous to vortex penetration in a
                                                                         J. Akimitsu, Nature, 410, 63 (2001).
long Josephson junction in a magnetic field H > Hc1 , since
in both cases the driving terms (charge and magnetization            [2] A. Liu, I.I. Mazin, and J. Kortus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 087005
current densities, respectively) are asymmetric functions of             (2001); H.J. Choi et al., Nature 418, 758 (2002).
x. By contrast, the soliton dynamics in the 4-terminal ge-           [3] P.C. Canfield and G.W. Crabtree, Physics Today, 56, 34
ometry is analogous to the steady-state annihilation of self-            (2003).
field Josephson vortices and antivortices in a long Josephson         [4] T. Yokoya et al., Science 294, 2518 (2001).
junction with a transport current. Because the total charge          [5] A.J. Legget, Prog. Theor. Phys. 36, 901 (1966); Rev. Mod.
along the horizontal strip in Fig 4c is nonzero, all θ− soli-            Phys. 47, 331 (1975).
tons are pushed in the same direction (anti-solitons move in
                                                                     [6] M. Sigrist and K. Ueda, Rev. Mod. Phys. 63, 239 (1991).
the opposite direction), similar to the flux flow of the Joseph-
son vortices driven by the Lorentz force of the transport cur-       [7] A. Gurevich, Phys. Rev. B. 67, 184515 (2003).
rent.                                                                [8] A. Gurevich et al., cond-mat./0305474.
     For J > Jt , the soliton shuttle in Fig. 6 results in con-      [9] A. Gurevich and V.M. Vinokur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 047004
tinuous voltage oscillations on the bridge. However despite              (2003).
the formal analogy with the behavior of a Josephson junc-
                                                                    [10] P.C. Canfield, S.L. Bud’ko, and D.K. Finnemore, Physica C
tion, the effects considered in this work are due to interband
                                                                         385, 1 (2003).
tunneling [5], so the generation of θ-solitons does not re-
quire any weak links. Unlike the Josephson vortex, a single         [11] S. Patnaik et al., Supercond. Sci. Technol., 14, 315 (2001).
θ-soliton moving with a constant velocity v does not cary           [12] I.I. Mazin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 107002 (2002).
magnetic flux, but the continuous phase slippage near the            [13] A.A. Golubov et al., J. Phys. C 14, 1353 (2002).
normal lead increases the electric field penetration depth Le  ˜
    ˜                                                               [14] A.E. Koshelev and A.A. Golubov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90,
to Le = (L2 + αe αθ /στθ )1/2 for J
               e                               Jt . [9] This ef-         177002 (2003).
fect increases the excess dc sheet resistance of the strip by
           ˜
Rex = (Le − Le )/σw.                                                [15] V.G. Kogan, Phys. Rev. B. 66, R020509 (2002).
     The dynamic phase textures can result in new features          [16] X. Song, et al., Supercond. Sci. Technol. 15, 511 (2002).
of nonlinear electrodynamics of two-gap superconductors.            [17] R.J. Cava, H.W. Zandbergen, and K. Inumaru. Physica C 385,
In particular, the soft interband θ-mode could manifest it-              8 (2003).
self in rf absorption at frequencies below the small gap ∆2 .       [18] Y. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 017002 (2002).
As follows from Eq. (11), interaction of the θ-mode with

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:0
posted:5/20/2013
language:Unknown
pages:5
Fischer Fost Fischer Fost SPM http://razzi.me/iasiatube
About If the shared docs can help you, pls view some as to support my sharing.