THIS CASE WAS INITIATED FOR MISAPPROPRIATION OF $49,147.70, FUNDS WHICH ANNE SUBMITTED TO THE COURT ALMOST 6 MONTHS BEFORE IT OPENED THIS CASE. THE FUNDS, IN THE FORM OF A CASHIERS CHECK, WAS IN JUDGE SCOLA'S CONTROL AND POSSESSION. THE BAR WAS WELL AWARE OF THIS. THE SAME DAY JUDGE SCOLA RECOMMENDED THAT ANNE BE DISBARRED FOR MISAPPROPRIATION OF THE $49,147.70, THE BAR REQUESTED AND JUDGE SCOLA SIGNED AN ORDER ASKING ANNE'S BANK TO REISSUE THE STALE CASHIERS CHECK. THE NEW CHECK WAS TURNED OVER TO WALD WHO "SUPPOSEDLY" DISTRIBUTED IT ALMOST 2 YEARS LATER TO ANNE'S CLIENTS.
Anne was not served with this case. The Bar used a copy of a return receipt, forged Anne's signature on the return receipt copy and declared it as proof that Anne was served with this case via certified mail. Then both The Bar and Judge Scola represented that Anne failed to file any response to the charges in the misappropriation case. Thus, this devasting order was entered against Anne with no opposition.
NEW CASE NUMBER. SAME ISSUE, SAME 8 CLIENTS.
The Bar with the aid of Judge Scola used all of the documents Anne generated in the initial case, SC01-1198 and filed them in this case as 7 volumes of RECORD/TRANSCRIPT. These unidentified documents are responses, defenses, letters, deposition testimony of Wald, Bar auditor and investigator, Anne's clients, The Bar auditor and investigator's reports, which exonorate Anne in this case. Case opened after Anne resigned and turn over all funds to Judge Scola, The Bar and the Court.
FEES CHARGED BY THE BAR FOR DEPOSITION, EXPERT, ETC... NO SUCH FEES WERE INCURRED BY THE BAR IN THIS CASE. Anne had to pay the judgment or she would not have been able to close on the home equity loan she applied for. Anne discovered this judgment when she applied for a home equity loan.