Docstoc

ACCELERATED PROGRESSION PROFORMA

Document Sample
ACCELERATED PROGRESSION PROFORMA Powered By Docstoc
					ACCELERATED PROGRESSION PROFORMA
(for completion by Chair of DProgC & FProgC after meetings)

                                                        CURRENT DETAILS
NAME:
JOB TITLE:
DEPARTMENT:
FACULTY:
APPOINTMENT START DATE:
APPOINTMENT END DATE:
FTE:
PATHWAY:
PROFILE LEVEL:
GRADE:
SPINE POINT
FTE SALARY
ACTUAL SALARY
NEXT INCREMENT DATE

                                             PROPOSAL UNDER CONSIDERATION

CATEGORY OF CONSIDERATION:                          ACCELERATED PROGRESSION

NORMAL DATE DUE FOR PROGRESSION:

DATE RECOMMENDED FOR ACCELERATED PROGRESSION:

PROPOSED PROFILE LEVEL:

PROPOSED JOB TITLE:

IF THE ROLE IS NOT PROGRESSABLE BEYOND LEVEL C (PATHWAYS 2 & 3 ONLY), PLEASE TICK HERE □
RESEARCH (please indicate criteria number in first column and provide clear rationale for decision in Comments section )

DProgC                                                           FProgC
          Yes No       Comments:                                            Yes No       Comments:
          Yes No       Comments:                                            Yes No       Comments:
          Yes No       Comments:                                            Yes No       Comments:
          Yes No       Comments:                                            Yes No       Comments:
          Yes No       Comments:                                            Yes No       Comments:
          Yes No       Comments:                                            Yes No       Comments:
          Yes No       Comments:                                            Yes No       Comments:
          Yes No       Comments:                                            Yes No       Comments:
          Yes No       Comments:                                            Yes No       Comments:
          Yes No       Comments:                                            Yes No       Comments:
Overall, following discussion and taking account of the above    Overall, following discussion and taking account of the above
criteria, does the committee believe that this area of           criteria, does the committee believe that this area of
consideration is satisfactory for the purposes of progression?   consideration is satisfactory for the purposes of progression?
Yes/No                                                           Yes/No

Comments:                                                        Comments:




TEACHING (please indicate criteria number in first column and provide clear rationale for decision in Comments section)
DProgC                                                           FProgC
      Yes     No     Comments:                                            Yes    No     Comments:
      Yes     No     Comments:                                            Yes    No     Comments:
      Yes     No     Comments:                                            Yes    No     Comments:
      Yes     No     Comments:                                            Yes    No     Comments:
      Yes     No     Comments:                                            Yes    No     Comments:
      Yes     No     Comments:                                            Yes    No     Comments:
      Yes     No     Comments:                                            Yes    No     Comments:
      Yes     No     Comments:                                            Yes    No     Comments:
      Yes     No     Comments:                                            Yes    No     Comments:
          Yes No       Comments:                                            Yes No       Comments:
Overall, following discussion and taking account of the above    Overall, following discussion and taking account of the above
criteria, does the committee believe that this area of           criteria, does the committee believe that this area of
consideration is satisfactory for the purposes of progression?   consideration is satisfactory for the purposes of progression?
Yes/No                                                           Yes/No

Comments:                                                        Comments:


Satisfactorily completed University of Bristol Teaching and Learning Programme? Yes/No       (NB. For Pathway 1 & 3 staff only)


PROFESSIONAL VALUES (please indicate criteria number in first column and provide clear rationale for decision in
Comments section)
DProgC                                                           FProgC
          Yes No       Comments:                                            Yes No       Comments:
          Yes No       Comments:                                            Yes No       Comments:
          Yes No       Comments:                                            Yes No       Comments:
          Yes No       Comments:                                            Yes No       Comments:
          Yes No       Comments:                                            Yes No       Comments:
          Yes No       Comments:                                            Yes No       Comments:
          Yes No       Comments:                                            Yes No       Comments:
          Yes No       Comments:                                            Yes No       Comments:
          Yes No       Comments:                                            Yes No       Comments:
          Yes No       Comments:                                            Yes No       Comments:
Overall, following discussion and taking account of the above    Overall, following discussion and taking account of the above
criteria, does the committee believe that this area of           criteria, does the committee believe that this area of
consideration is satisfactory for the purposes of progression?   consideration is satisfactory for the purposes of progression?
Yes/No                                                           Yes/No

Comments:                                                        Comments:
                                       DProgC RECOMMENDATION:

CANDIDATE RECOMMENDED FOR ACCELERATED PROGRESSION?         YES/NO

IF NO, PLEASE GIVE FULL EXPLANATION:




DETAILS OF ANY EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES OR EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES ISSUES TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT:


OTHER COMMENTS:


Signed (Head of Department):   …………………………………………………              Date OF DProgC: ………………………………

                                           FProgC DECISION:

CANDIDATE RECOMMENDED FOR ACCELERATED PROGRESSION?         YES/NO

IF NO, PLEASE GIVE FULL EXPLANATION:




DETAILS OF ANY EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES OR EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES ISSUES TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT:


OTHER COMMENTS:


Signed (Dean):    ……………………………………………………                          Date Of FProgC: ……………………………

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:23
posted:4/25/2013
language:English
pages:4