Contracts short outline

Reviews
tesdfsdfsd
Rated 4 out of 10

June 25, 2008 (1 years 6 ago)
fdsfsdfsdfs

Shared by:
Anonymous
Tags
Stats
views:
1380
downloads:
243
rating:
5.5(2)
reviews:
1
posted:
10/23/2007
language:
English
pages:
0
Contracts 1 Applicable Law  CL (real estate, services)  UCC (sale of goods)  Mixed Deal= whichever is predominant. All or Nothing Rule unless K divides payment. Offers  = manifestation of an intention to contract.  Content: not required to contain all material terms (Real Estate= price and description req’d. Goods= no price required) o Vague & Ambiguous Material Terms in offer never an offer (must be material terms) o Requirements Contracts/Output Contracts ―All‖ ―Only‖ ok. May be an increase if in line with prior demands.  Context: (Advertisements ≠ offers, except (1) in nature of reward or (2) advertisement is specific as to quantity and expressly indicates who can accept.‖ Offers That Can’t be Revoked  Option (promise and consideration)  Firm Offer (goods, signed written promise, merchant, max 3 months)  Detrimental Reliance (reasonably foreseeable)  Start of performance (unilateral- reasonable time to complete) Termination of an Offer  Lapse (time stated or reasonable time)  Revocation (Words to or conduct that offeree is aware of; effective when received)  Rejection  Counteroffer (not Bargaining=?)  Conditional Acceptance= counteroffer  Additional Terms (CL=mirror image rule, UCC= if 1 merchant, proposal to be separately considered; UCC= if both merchants, becomes part of K, unless (1) materially alters or (2) rejection) Acceptance  Offeree fully performs (notice issue)  Offeree starts to perform (bilateral=acceptance, Unilateral= not acceptance)  Offeree promises to perform  Mailbox Rule (acceptance when sent, unless rejection sent first)  Seller of Goods sends wrong goods (Goods, Acceptance & Breach unless Accommodation=counteroffer)  Silence (Gen Rule= not acceptance. Excptn= if offeree agrees by words or conduct that it is) Legal Reasons For Not Enforcing a Contract  Lack of Consideration (Bargained for Legal Detriment) (promise, performance, forbearance) o Past consideration= no, unless expressly requested and expected payment o Modification (CL= not allowed unless 1-addition or change in performance 2unforeseen difficulty so severe 3-3rd party promises to pay) (UCC- ok, good faith test*) o Consideration Substitute= 1) written promise to pay a debt barred by SoL or other defense; 2) promissory estoppel (promise, reasonable reliance, enforcement necessary to avoid justice.         Contracts 2 Lack of Capacity (Infant, Mental Incomp., Intoxicated) (Necessity & Retain Benefit exceptions) Statute of Frauds o Falls w/in: (Performance more than 1 year, Sale of Goods $500 or more, Services over 1 year, guarantee to pay 3 rd party debt, executor promise to pay estate debt with own funds, promise in consideration of marriage) o Satisfies S/F:  Writing: Non-Goods= material terms test (material terms & signature); Goods=Quantity & Signature (unlss both merchants & no response in 10 days)  Performance: Service=full; Property=2 of 3 (payment, possession, imprvmnts); Goods (Ordinary= partial to extent of part; Specially manufactured=substantial beginning)  Judicial Admission: ∆ admits in pleadings, testimony or discovery o Modification: if new deal falls within, must satisfy S/F. If new deal doesn’t, need not. o K provisions requiring all Modifications be in writing (CL=ignored; UCC=effective) Illegality (Subject matter=illegal, K void; Purpose=illegal, voidable) Misrepresentation (False assertion, concealment of facts) Duress (Physical, Economic- improper threat, no reasonable alternative) Unconscionability (unfair surprise, oppressive terms) tested at time K is made. Ambiguity in words (No K if material term open to 2 reasonable interpretations; each party attaches different meanings; neither party knows or has reason to know term is open) Mistake as to Material Facts (both parties are mistaken; subject matter mistake; not price) Parol Evidence  PE= oral or written terms at time or before integration (written final deal).  Changing the deal (no PE allowed, Excptn= mistake in integration (words left out)  Defense Exception (PE allowed to determine misrepresentation, fraud, duress)  Explanation Exception (PE allowed to resolve ambiguities  Adding to Integration- consistent addt’l terms (If complete integration= PE not allowed. If partial= PE allowed) Source of K terms- explaining words or gaps in Ks  Course of Performance (same people, same K- what they’ve already done)- crt looks at first  Course of Dealing (same people, different K)- crt looks at next  Custom, Usage (different people, different K) Delivery Obligations of Seller of Goods  No place of delivery agreed upon seller’s place of business or place where goods are  Shipment by Common Carrier: (shipmentwhen seller gets goods to common carrier, makes reasonable arrangements for delivery, notifies buyer. Destination when goods arrive) Risk of Loss  =After K is formed but before buyer receives goods and goods damaged and no one is at fault  Agreement= agreement controls  Delivery by common carrier= shifts to buyer when seller completes delivery obligations  Unrelated Breach= breaching party liable  No agreement, common carrier, or unrelated breach: (If seller=merchant, RoL shifts when buyer receives goods. If seller ≠ merchant, when seller ―tenders‖ goods (i.e. tells buyer how to get them) Contracts 3 Warranties of Quality  Express Warranty= words of promise. ―all steel‖= warranty ―top quality‖ ≠warranty  Implied Warranty of Merchantability (implied; goods fit for ordinary purpose. *must be from merchant)  Implied Warranty of Fitness for Particular Purpose (Buyer has particular purpose that seller knows, then implied warranty.  Contractual limitations on Warranty: o (1) Disclaimer- can’t disclaim express warranties; can disclaim implied warranties o (2) Limitation on Remedies: can limit remedies (test is Unconscionability) Performance- where performance is not what was expected  CL= see if parties did what they promised to do. If not, breach.  UCC o Perfect Tender: seller obligated to deliver perfect goods o Rejection of Goods: must be before acceptance. If goods less than perfect, buyer can reject. (Exception- Cure & Installment Sale K) o Cure: seller can cure before time has expired; if expired, must have reasonable grounds for believing cure will be acceptable o Installment Sales Ks: can only reject if substantial impairment. o Acceptance of Goods: if accept, can’t then reject. Must have opportunity to inspect; implied acceptance retains goods after opportunity for acceptance. o Revocation of Acceptance: can revoke if (1) nonconformity substantially impairs value of goods; (2) excusable ignorance or reasonable reliance on seller’s assurances; (3) revocation w/in a reasonable time after discovery of nonconformity. Remedies  Specific Performance (Ks for Real Estate and Unique Goods only) (no right for services)  Reformation (changing K, if mistake or misrepresentation)  Reclamation (right of unpaid seller to get its goods back- 10 Day Rule- 10 days to demand good back)  Entrustment- (right of good faith purchaser. Owner intentionally leaves goods with seller of that kind who sells them to 3 rd party. Original owner can’t reclaim.)  Expectation Damages (put π in same position as if K had been performed) o +Incidental Damages (costs incurred in dealing with breach; always recoverable) o +Foreseeable Consequential Damages (damages arising from π’s special circumstances) o -Avoidable Damages (no recovery for damages that could have been avoided w/out undue burden. Must have some alternative comparable situation.  Certainty Limitation (damages must be established with reasonable certainty  Reliance Interest (put π in same position as if no K)  Restitution Interest (put ∆ in position as if no K- unjust enrichment)  Liquidated Damages (must be a reasonable forecast. Concern is penalty is too high)  Limitation of Remedies (establishes ceiling. If unconscionable- not allowed. Concern is penalty is too low)  Damages Rules for Sale of Goods (UCC) o Seller breaches/Buyer has goods- FMV(if perfect) – FMV (as delivered) o Seller breaches/Seller has goods- Replacement Price (or Mkt price@breach) – K Price o Buyer breaches/Buyer has goods- K Price Contracts 4 o Buyer breaches/Seller has goods- K Price – Resale Price (or Mkt price@delivery)  **if lost volume seller, damages= lost profits Excuse for Non-Performance  Material Breach: if one party materially breaches, other party is excused (exception= divisible K- then do unit by unit basis) (if not perfect tender, buyer can reject)  Performance Condition: strict compliance with express condition (unless based on approval, than objective standard, unless unless subject is Artinherently discretionary.) o Excusing Express Condition: Estoppel (before event occurs) and Waiver (after)  Anticipatory Repudiation: unambiguous statement that repudiating party will not perform made prior to when performance is due. (can be retracted if timely and no material change in position by other party)  Later K: o Recission (later agreement to cancel the K), o Accord/Satisfaction (agreement to accept a different performance in satisfaction of existing obligation).—if not performed, party can sue on either. Only if new agreement is actually doen will it replace the old one. o Modification (replaces old agreement with new agreement, CL- consideration req’d)— can only sue on new agreement. o Novation: (agreement between both parties to substitution of new party. New party is excused.) different from delegation which does not excuse.  Unforeseen Event (unforeseen event after K formation but before completion that makes it impossible, impracticable, or frustrates purpose of performance). o Damage or Destruction of Subject Matter of K- (later occurrence, unforeseen, impossible—excuses. Risk of Loss rules.) o Death (if dead party is ―special‖excused; if dead party not ―special‖ unexcused, if dead party not in K, than if it is still possibleunexcused.) o Subsequent Law or Regulation (law makes performance illegalexcused by impossibility) (law makes mutually understood purpose illegal excused by frustration of purpose.) 3rd Party Contracts  3rd Party Beneficiary (Only intended beneficiary has K rights; K cannot be cancelled w/out 3rd party’s approval if 3rd party knows of and has relied on or assented, unless K says otherwise) o (3rd Party can sue Promisor and if creditor beneficiary, can sue promisee/ if Donee Beneficiary, cannot sue Promisee). Promisor can assert any defense as they would against Promisee.  Assignment (transfer of rights under K. K provisions can prohibit or invalidate assignments. CL bars assignment that changes duties of the obligor (not payment). Consideration not required. Must be present tense. “I assign”. o (Assignee can sue obligor. Same defenses) o (Multiple Assignments: Gratuitous Assignment- last assignee wins. Assignment for Consideration- first assignee wins)  Delegation (party to K transfers work/duty to 3 rd party. Permitted unless contract prohibits delegations OR assignments, or K calls for special skills of delegator, or K calls for delegator with special reputation. o Delegator remains liable if assignee does not perform. o Delegatee is liable if she receives consideration from delegator.

Related docs
Contracts Outline
Views: 994  |  Downloads: 92
Contracts Short Outline
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
Contracts Outline
Views: 330  |  Downloads: 36
Popovich Contracts Outline
Views: 2045  |  Downloads: 207
Contracts Outline
Views: 10  |  Downloads: 1
CONTRACTS OUTLINE
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
Law School Outline - Contracts Short
Views: 228  |  Downloads: 19
Pepperdine Law-Contracts Outline
Views: 1531  |  Downloads: 55
contracts
Views: 307  |  Downloads: 25
contracts
Views: 274  |  Downloads: 31