VIEWS: 0 PAGES: 2 POSTED ON: 4/22/2013
Use excel adds on – Precision Tree and @ Risk Problem 3: A decision maker is working on a problem that requires her to study the uncertainty surrounding the payoff of an investment. There are three possible levels of payoff -$1,000, $5,000, and $10,000. As a rough approximation, the decision maker believes that each possible payoff is equally likely. But she is not fully comfortable with the assessment that each probability is exactly 1/3, and so would like to conduct a sensitivity analysis. In fact, she believes that each probability could range from 0 to ½. 1. Show how a Monte Carlo simulation could facilitate a sensitivity analysis of the probabilities of the payoff 2. Suppose the decision maker is willing to say that each of the three probabilities could be chosen from a uniform distribution between 0 and 1. Could you incorporate this information into your simulation? If so, how? If not, explain why not, or what additional information you would need. Problem 4 John Campbell, an employee of Manhattan Construction Company claims to have injured his back as a result of a fall while repairing the roof at one of the Eastview apartment buildings. He filed a lawsuit against Doug Reynolds, the owner of Eastview Apartments, asking for damage of $1,500,000. John claims that the roof had rotten sections and that his fall could have been prevented if Mr. Reynolds had told Manhattan Construction about the problem. Mr. Reynolds notified his insurance company, Allied Insurance of the lawsuit. Allied must defend Mr. Reynolds, and decide what action to take regarding the lawsuit. Some depositions and a series of discussions took place between both sides. As a result, John Campbell offered to accept a settlement of $750,000. Thus one option for Allied to pay John $750,000 to settle the claim. Allied is also considering making John a counteroffer of $400,000 in the hope that he will accept a lesser amount to avoid the time and the cost of going to trial. Allied’s preliminary investigation shows that John’s case is strong. Allied is concerned that John may reject their counteroffer and request a jury trial. Allied’s lawyers spent some time exploring John’s likely reaction if they make a counteroffer of $400,000. The lawyers concluded that it is adequate to consider three possible outcomes to represent John’s possible reaction to a counteroffer of $400,000. 1. John will accept the counteroffer and the case will be closed. 2. John will reject the counteroffer and elect to have a jury decide the settlement amount, or 3. John will make a counteroffer to Allied of $600,000. If John does make a counteroffer, Allied decided that they will not make additional counteroffers. They will either accept John’s counteroffer of $600,000 or go to trial. If the case goes to jury trial, Allied considers three outcomes possible: 1. The jury may reject John’s claim and Allied will not be required to pay any damages; 2. The jury will find in favor of John and award him $750,000 in damages or 3. The jury will conclude that John has a strong case and award him the full amount of $1,500,000. Key considerations as Allied develops its strategy for disposing of the case are the probabilities associated with John’s response to an Allied counteroffer of $400,000 and the probabilities associated with the three possible trial outcomes. Allied lawyers believe the probability that John will accept the counteroffer of $400,000 is 0.1, that the probability that John will reject the counteroffer of $400,000 is 0.4, and the probability that John will, himself, make a counteroffer to Allied of $600,000 is 0.5. If the case goes to court, they believe that the probability the jury will award John damage of $1,500,000 is 0.3, the probability that the jury will award John damages of $750,000 is 0.5, and the probability that the jury will award John nothing is 0.2. Perform an analysis of the problem facing Allied Insurance and prepare a report that summarizes your findings and recommendations. Be sure to include: Decision tree, a recommendation regarding whether Allied should accept John’s initial offer to settle the claim for $750,000; a decision strategy that Allied should follow if they decide to make John a counteroffer of $400,000 and a risk profile of your recommendation strategy. Problem 5: Consider an oil-wildcatting problem. You have mineral rights on a piece of land that you believe may have oil underground. There is only a 10% chance that you will strike oil if you drill, but the payoff is $200,000. It costs $10,000 to drill. The alternative is not to drill at all, in which case your profit is zero. o Draw a decision tree to represent your problem. Should you drill? o Using the decision tree, calculate EVPI. o Before you drill, you might consult a geologist who can assess the promise of the piece of land. She can tell you whether your prospects are “good” or “poor.” But she is not a perfect predictor. If there is oil, the conditional probability is 0.95 that she will say prospects are good. If there is no oil, the conditional probability is 0.85 that she will say poor. Draw a decision tree that includes the “Consult Geologist” alternative. Be careful to calculate the appropriate probabilities to include in the decision tree. Finally, calculate the EVII for the geologist. If she charges $7,000, what should you do? Problem 6: Assess your utility function in two different ways. a. Use the certainty-equivalent approach to assess your utility function for wealth over a range of $100 to $20,000. b. Use the probability-equivalent approach to assess U($1500), U($5600), U($9050), and U($13,700). Are these assessments consistent with the assessments made in part a? Plot these assessments and those from part a on the same graph and compare them.
Pages to are hidden for
"228684_1_FE-pro... - Transtutors.com"Please download to view full document