Labor economics

Reviews
Shared by: keara
Stats
views:
12
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
11/7/2009
language:
ENGLISH
pages:
0
Labor economics  Why is labor behaviorally interesting?      Important in scale People sell themselves (identity, appreciation) Natural social comparison with others Quality assurance problem + room for rationalization Firms’ problem is endogenous sorting & incentive “Gift exchange” and supra-marginal wages Crowding out Critique of the single-activity agency model Labor supply: Cabs  Behavioral effects in labor markets:     1. Too-high wages and unemployment Efficiency wages vs gift exchange Price P supply Wage w demand Quantity Q unemployment at w Why are wages too high?  Efficiency wages (Stiglitz et al)  Pay “too much” so workers have something to lose if they shirk Why don’t workers bid for jobs?  Role for nepotism, social networks, “hiring bonusses” ($5k consulting firm “bounties”)   “Gift exchange” (Akerlof-Yellen)  Pay “too much” so workers reciprocate with high (uncontractible) effort Consistent with resistance to wage cuts (Bewley)  Experimental evidence (Fehr et al, PJ Healy,…)  Moral hazard in contracting: Theory and experimental evidence  Fehr setup:      Firms offer w Firms earn 10e-w Workers choose e Workers earn w-c(e) No reputations (cf. PJ Healy) Competition does not drive wages down…firms choose high wage offer workers & expect reciprocity 2. Crowding out  Do extrinsic ($) incentives crowd out intrinsic motivation? Do puzzles for $ or no-$. After $ removed, no$ group does more puzzles (Deci et al)  Female tennis players: Play for fun as kids… …later on tour, quit after getting appearance fee  Q: Is it a “strike” or permanent decrease in incentive?  Benabou-Tirole REStud 03  Workers infer task difficulty or skill from wage offer (“overjustification”, “self-perception”, “looking glass self”)        Worker exerts effort 0,1, cost is c in [c*,c*] Worker gets signal σ correlated with c Success pays V to agent, W to firm Θ is probability of success given effort Firm offers bonus b Worker exerts effort c(σ,b)<Θ(V+b) works if σ>σ*(b) Prop 1: In equilibrium    Empirical leverage: Negative effect occurs only if firm knows more about task difficulty or worker skill than the worker knows Bonus is short-term reinforcer: b1σ*(b2) Rewards are bad news: b1
Related docs
Labor_economics
Views: 15  |  Downloads: 2
Journal of Labor Economics
Views: 5  |  Downloads: 2
Economics Economics
Views: 80  |  Downloads: 5
Journal of Labor Economics ¡44TgE}
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 1
Economics 190 Economics of Labor Relations
Views: 19  |  Downloads: 0
Economics
Views: 271  |  Downloads: 7
ECONOMICS
Views: 189  |  Downloads: 2
Economics
Views: 18  |  Downloads: 0
economics
Views: 149  |  Downloads: 0
economics
Views: 5  |  Downloads: 0
Economics
Views: 10  |  Downloads: 0
economics
Views: 58  |  Downloads: 10
premium docs
Other docs by keara
Istanbul Maltepe Military Hospitals Pharmacy
Views: 308  |  Downloads: 0
ISMP Survey Reveals Pharmacy Interventions
Views: 292  |  Downloads: 0
IRB Pharmacy Verification
Views: 313  |  Downloads: 0
IRB and Pharmacy Clarification
Views: 226  |  Downloads: 0
IPG
Views: 96  |  Downloads: 0
Investigational Drug Pharmacy
Views: 96  |  Downloads: 1