Docstoc

guy

Document Sample
guy Powered By Docstoc
					Colin Poindexter

2/27/07

Girl with the Pearl Earring Essay

Ms. Perecko

                   Sociology in Delft and Griet’s duality of existence

       In Tracy Chevalier’s novel, The Girl with the Pearl Earring, Chevalier utilizes

principals of sociology to exhibit Griet’s duality of existence between her home and

where she works. In the novel, Chevalier uses the pearl earring, Griet’s occupation, and

Griet’s family life as a catalyst to overcome the socio- economic circumstances of Griet.

In truth, without Griet’s low socio-economic status the entire novel would not come to

be. If she were wealthy, then she wouldn’t have gone off to work with Vermeer.

       Griet’s home life is a transport vehicle for the rest of the novel. Griet’s father is an

artist who became blind after an accident with tiles. “Father had been a tile painter…One

day the kiln exploded, taking his eyes and his trade. He was the lucky one---two other

men died” (Chevalier, The Girl with the Pearl Earring,7). Her brother is at an artistic

apprenticeship, where he is not accelerating. Griet’s family needs money to make ends

meet. Griet’s mother finds the money needed in the form of the Vermeer family: ‘“We

have to, now your father has lost his trade”’ (6). It is agreed that Griet will work as a

maid, not for herself, but for her family.

       During the time that Griet is working as a maid, her duality of existence is

automatically apparent. Because Griet works 10 minutes from her home she is torn

between two worlds-- the world that she has been born into and the world that was built

for her. While working, Griet works for the Vermeers, a well to do family, in the town of
Delft. Johannes Vermeer is a thriving artist, which makes Griet jealous because her father

was an artist. “A row of Delft tiles painted with cupids lined the bottom of the walls to

protect the whitewash from our mops. They were not [Griet’s] fathers.” (33) This

jealousy is contrasted with her affection for Vermeer. Griet has an artistic personality (‘“I

see you have separated the whites’, [Vermeer] said, indicating the turnips and onions.

‘And then the orange and the purple do not sit together. Why is that?’… ‘The colors fight

when they are side by side, sir’” (5)). This artistry makes her lust for Vermeer. This

parallel makes it both difficult and easy to work for the Vermeers. It is easy because Griet

has a passion for the arts and therefore she is honing her craft. On the other hand,

Vermeer’s success reminds her of her fathers deteriorating career.

        In this time period everyone knew his or her place. Griet at one point stepped out

of the normal mold of a maid. This stepping out is conveyed when Griet slaps one of the

girls:“[Griet] reached over and slapped her. Her face turned red, but she did not

cry…Aleydis and Lisbeth peered down at [Griet] solemnly” (22). Griet then continues:

“Then [Griet] went outside again, this time with a broom... I’ll tell our mother. Maids

don’t slap us.”’(23) This slapping shows a sign of independence on Griet’s part. It

illustrates that she is not only a maid, but is also a parental figure. Griet feels that because

of her lower economic status the children think less of her. The way that children are

raised is also revealed. The children of Vermeer were taught their entire life that they

were better than the people who Vermeer employed.

        The pearl earring also plays a part to show evidence of the socio-economic status

of Griet. When Vermeer agrees to paint Griet he forces her to wear peal earrings. Pearl

earrings often symbolize wealth, which Griet has none of. Also, Vermeer forces Griet to
put the pearl earring in both ears, even though only one ear would be in the painting.

“Finally [Vermeer] reached behind him again. ‘You must wear the other [earring] as

well”’ (209). This puncturing (“Griet pulled the earlobe taunt and in one moment pushed

the needle through [her] flesh” (201)) symbolizes Griet’s duality of existence. This

piercing is only a pin hole of wealth. It does not diminish the lack of money surrounding

that piercing. But rather it exemplifies the fact that while Griet is a poor girl, she still has

a tiny hole of wealth.

        This pin hole of wealth would not be possible without Vermeer. When Vermeer

finally decides to paint Griet, she makes her wear an earring. At this time Griet has no

piercing and therefore she must get one. To numb the skin, many ideas are suggested to

her, the first idea being ice, the second being clove oil. Vermeer refuses to pay for the

numbing of the skin, and therefore Griet must pay for it herself. Griet purchases the clove

oil, yet she feels terrible because it would cost her two days wages. When Griet goes

home to deliver her pay to her mother disapproves by stating: ‘“It will cost more than two

days wages to replace [the clove oil]…What were you doing, looking at yourself in the

mirror? How careless?”’ (201). The carelessness of Griet is flaunted because at the time

of the purchase, Griet ignored her upbringing and lived in the moment.

        Another way that Chevalier displays Vermeer falsely proclaiming Griet’s ture

socio-economic status is through the hat. “You do not want to be painted…with satin and

fur and dressed hair. (182)” Then Vermeer comes down with three caps for Griet to

choose from. Griet states: “There were three caps, all too fine for me…(182)” In this

quotation, Griet expresses her feelings toward acting different a class, by stating that the

caps the Vermeer gives her are “too fine for her”. This also relates to Griet’s duality of
existence. In this part of the novel, Griet feels torn between the poor life that her father

creates for her and the life of luxury that is felt when working for the Vermeers. Griet still

hold true to the very humble life that her father makes for her. The denial of an artificial

life creates a portrait of who Griet’s character truly is. While many would deny their past

and embrace the future, Griet does just the opposite of that, accepting the person she was

as who she will be, no matter the consequence.

        In Tracy Chevalier’s novel The Girl with the Pearl Earring, Chevalier creates a

piece of artwork contrasting Griet’s socio-economic status and Vermeers socio-economic

status. In the novel, Chevalier illustrates the hardships of not having money, yet still

having a heart and keeping the memories of when one does not have money close to her

heart. This parallel between money and memories is displayed though Griet’s duality of

existence, between her original modest home life and her new glamorous work life. This

parallel between lives confuses Griet because she no longer lives at home, and therefore

it makes it easier to slip into her new life, yet Griet holds true to the fact that money isn’t

everything.
                                    Works Cited


Chevalier, Tracy. Girl with a Pearl Earring. New York, New York: Penguin Putnam Inc.,
     1999.

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:0
posted:4/7/2013
language:Unknown
pages:5