Lefkowitz v Great Minn

Reviews
Shared by:
Anonymous
Stats
views:
747
downloads:
5
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
10/23/2007
language:
English
pages:
0
Lefkowitz v. Great Minneapolis Surplus Store 251 Minn. 188, 86 N.W.2d 689 Facts: P saw an advertisement in a newspaper offering one fur worth $139.50 for $1, first come first serve. He was the first to appear in the store but the vendor refused to sell him the fur saying that the ad was directed to women only. He is suing for the value of the fur, minus the dollar. D cites Craft v. Elder, Judge here says these facts and circumstances are different. Quantity, How it is going to be sold and to whom, Definite Price. Advertisement becomes a valid offer when it has these elements. Procedure: Rule:

Related docs
Marshall_ Lefkowitz Briefs
Views: 200  |  Downloads: 1
Lefkowitz v Great Minneapolis Surplus Store
Views: 221  |  Downloads: 4
Mary_Lefkowitz
Views: 6  |  Downloads: 1
Mary Lefkowitz book review
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
Gary Lefkowitz v United States (041696P)
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
United States v Gary Lefkowitz (974248U)
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
United States v Gary Lefkowitz (954206P)
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Gary Lefkowitz v CityEquity Group (972819P)
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
2-Offer-Lefkowitz v Greater MN Surplus Store
Views: 114  |  Downloads: 2
premium docs