Working Wives and Mothers What Happens to Family Life by GerryTaruna


More Info
									 Working wives and mothers :
 what happens to family life?
 The changing work role of women has caused
 much concern about the survival of the family;
 most women can mix work with marriage
and motherhood and handle or better share
the resulting household responsibilities


 American families seem to be besieged from all sides.                   male work patterns . The war effort's high demand for
 Divorce rates are climbing ; marriage is being post-                    labor and patriotic fervor induced many women to join
 poned, if not rejected ; fertility rates are falling; increas-          the labor force, boosting the size of the female work
ing numbers of children are being raised only by their                   force by 57 percent during the war. Some analysts pre-
mothers, either because of divorce or because their par-                 dicted that after the war family work patterns would re-
ents were never married ; and wives and mothers in re-                   turn to the previous norm . They reasoned that rising
cord numbers are rushing out of the home into the                        productivity and economic growth would continue to
labor market . What is the effect of these occurrences on                boost the income earned by husbands, thus reducing
the institution of the family? Does the "economic inde-                  the need for another check and inducing wives to return
pendence" of working women influence their decisions                     to their homes. This, of course, did not happen, as
to either begin or end a marriage or to rear children?                  economists failed to consider the nonpecuniary attrac-
Too frequently, the changing work patterns of women                     tions of work and the appetite for more income .
are confused with causing the deterioration of family                      Since World War II, American households have
life . Careful analysis of family-related data show that al-            shown a strong propensity to increase their consump-
though American families are changing, they are not                     tion of goods and services . Many wives joined the work
eroding.                                                                force to finance these upward consumption patterns .
   The fact that women are working in record numbers                    Like the mechanical rabbit leading the greyhounds
is not a new phenomenon . What has changed are the                      around the racetrack, these aspirations have consistently
conditions and places in which they work . Many tasks                   stayed ahead of rising productivity, often requiring an-
which were once performed inside the home are now                       other paycheck in the chase for the "good life ." With
the source of jobs held by women outside the home.                      inflationary pressures and slow growth in productivity
World War II stands as a major breaking point in fe-                    during the 1970's and early 1980's leading to sluggish
                                                                        gains and even occasional declines in real earnings, an-
                                                                        other check became necessary to maintain the standard
Sar A. Levitan is director of the Center for Social Policy Studies,     of living, or growing consumption expectations, to
George Washington University, and Richard S. Belous is executive di-
                                                                        which the families had become accustomed . By 1980, 3
rector of the National Council on Employment Policy . This article is
adapted from their book, What's Happening to the American Family?,      of 5 families had at least two household members in the
to be published by The Johns Hopkins University . Press, Fall 1981 .    labor force-in most cases, the husband and the wife .

Work, marriage, and motherhood                               partnership or it could create new insecurities.
                                                                Given these conflicting and diverse factors that may
  Some futurologists have assumed that the vast up-          have bearing on divorce, statistical demonstration show-
surge of women in the work force may portend a rejec-        ing a direct positive relationship between divorce and a
tion of marriage . Many women, according to this             wife working is unattainable. Often studies have reached
hypothesis, would rather work than marry . This "inde-       the conclusion that families in which the wife is work-
pendence effect" would reduce the probability that           ing are no more likely to separate or divorce than
women would marry as they are better able to support         households in which only the husband is in the labor
themselves . The converse of this concern is that the        force .
prospects of becoming a multi-paycheck household                The relationship between the expanding female work
could encourage marriages . Data show that economic          force and reduced fertility rates appears to be clearer .
downturns tend to postpone marriage because the              With advances in family planning, a majority of wives
parties cannot afford to establish a family or are con-      have managed to combine motherhood with work . The
cerned about rainy days ahead . As the economy re-           entry of women in the work force has not led to a vast
bounds    and prospects improve for          employment,     increase in childlessness among married couples, but
financial security, and advancement, the number of           has led to a lower fertility rate among working wives
marriages also rises . In the past, only the earnings and    when other social and economic factors are taken into
financial prospects of the man counted in this part of       consideration . Yet some reservation may be appropriate .
the marriage decision . Now, however, the earnings abili-    In West Germany, for example, fertility rates of the na-
ty of a woman can make her more attractive as a mar-         tive population during the 1970's have declined even
riage partner-a modern version of the old-fashioned          more than in the United States, but with a smaller in-
dowry .                                                      crease in female labor force participation .
   Coincident with the increase in women working out-
side the home is the increase in divorce rates . Yet, it     Coping with family-related duties. The wife's responsibil-
may be wrong to jump to any simple cause-and-effect          ities outside the home have not filtered back into a
conclusions . The impact of a wife's work on divorce is      major reallocation of responsibilities within the family .
no less cloudy than its impact on marriage decisions .       With the rising costs of household help, the option to
The realization that she can be a good provider may in-      pay another person to do the housework is beyond the
crease the chances that a working wife will choose di -      means of the vast majority . Also, there are limits as to
vorce over an unsatisfactory marriage . But the reverse is   the chores that can be passed on to the friendly neigh-
equally plausible . Tensions grounded in financial prob-     borhood supermarket clerk or appliance seller . Even
lems often play a key role in ending a marriage . Given      more than in the office or factory, too many household
high unemployment, inflationary problems, and slow           chores cannot be mechanized . Worksharing by other
growth in real earnings, a working wife can increase         members of the family remains largely a hope . The
household income and relieve some of these pressing          working wife and mother is, therefore, left to her de-
financial burdens . By raising a family's standard of liv-   vices to cope as wage or salary earner and unpaid
ing, a working wife may bolster her family's financial       houseworker .
and emotional stability .                                       When the number of hours a working wife labors
   Psychological factors also should be considered . For     outside the home are added to the time spent on house-
example, a wife blocked from a career outside the home       hold chores, some studies have concluded that most
may feel caged or shackled to the house-a situation          working wives wind up laboring more hours per week
some have dramatically likened to a pressure cooker          than their husbands . Rough estimates based on data
with no safety valve to release the steam. She may view      from the late 1960's and early 1970's indicated that a
her only choice as seeking a divorce. On the other hand,     wife may average 65 hours on her combined jobs inside
if she can find fulfillment through work outside the         and outside the home (assuming that she holds a full-
home, work and marriage can go together to create a          time job in the labor market) . This exceeds the average
stronger and more stable union.                              time husbands spent working on the job and in the
   Also, a major part of women's inequality in marriage      home by about 8 hours per week . However, a more re-
has been due to the fact that, in most cases, men have       cent study based on data from the mid-1970's indicates
remained the main breadwinners . With higher earnings        that married women labored about the same total hours
capacity and status occupations outside of the home          in their combined jobs as men-roughly 60 hours per
comes the capacity to wield power within the family . A      week . There has been only a very small increase in the
working wife may rob a husband of being the master of        hours of housework done by married men (still under 3
the house . Depending upon how the couple reacts to          hours per week, or one-sixth the time spent by working
these new conditions, it could create a stronger equal       wives) .' It is difficult to make accurate estimates of time

MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW September 1981 e Working Wives and Mothers

use by men and women, but it appears that there still          Going it alone
exists a significant sexual division of labor even if total
hours worked may be becoming equal for many married                It appears that female-headed families will remain a
men and women.                                                  significant phenomenon on the American scene. Such
   Just as pathologies within labor markets-such as             families, despite feminist advances, are still more likely
sexual discrimination-have been slow in changing, so            to be poor and to experience sustained economic hard-
will home adjustments to the new realities of both hus-         ship . Trying to be family head, mother, and full-time
band and wife working outside. For example, while               member of the labor force has been a difficult challenge
most men are just starting to become involved in house-         for most women . Working women who head households
hold responsibilities, this trend soon may be the single        are at an even more disadvantage than other women.
largest impact on families associated with wives enter-            Single-parent families tend, however, to be a tempo-
ing the labor force. In the absence of social upheavals,        rary phenomenon . Data on the gross flows of women
the slow evolution is toward family work roles based            who become family heads indicate that this condition is
more on equality and less on sexual stereotypes . Many          for many women only a way station, as they later mar-
working wives appear to be assuming a larger role in            ry or remarry. Still, the conditions experienced by these
making major family-related decisions than nonworking           women and their children present serious problems cov-
wives with no earnings, but again, change has been              ering a wide range of social issues from welfare to labor
slow . Yet, there seem to have been some changes in             market discrimination . Many have found it impossible
sharing responsibility and authority .                          to pull families out of poverty without government help .
                                                                   At the start of the 1970's, nearly 1 of 10 families was
No turning back
                                                                headed by a woman; this ratio rose to 1 of 7 families a
    If the survival of the family depends on women re-          decade later, when more than 8 million women headed
 turning to the home to become full-time housewives and         families . Altogether, these families accounted for 26 mil-
 mothers, the institution's future existence is indeed frag-    lion persons, including 12 million children . Today, 17
ile . There has been no decline in the career aspirations       percent of all American children are being raised in a
 of women, and continued progress in family planning,          family headed by a woman, compared with 10 percent
bedroom technology, and household management will              in 1970 .
let more women become both wives and mothers as                    Black children are far more likely than white young-
well as workers outside of the home. As the potential          sters to live in a home maintained by a woman. In
rewards and work opportunities for women expand, the            1980, half of all black children were being raised in
psychic and economic attractions in the market place           such a household, compared with 12 percent of all
are likely to exert even greater pull .                        white children . A Hispanic youngster had about a
   With inflationary pressures and slow growth in pro-         20-percent chance of living in this type of household.
ductivity leading to sluggish gains and even occasional           The reasons families had a female head also changed
declines in real earnings, more families will depend on        during the 1970's . Historically, widows have represent-
two wage earners just to make ends meet or to finance          ed the largest proportion of women who headed fami-
a higher standard of living . Women in the work force,         lies . At the start of the 1970's, roughly 43 percent of
including the majority of married women, are in the la-        female family heads were widows, twice the proportion
bor force to stay, and this is not a new phenomenon . It       who were divorced . By the end of the decade, divorced
was only with the rise of the industrial revolution-and        women accounted for 34 percent of all women who
then only when it was in full swing and immigrants             headed families, while widows represented 29 percent of
supplied adequate and cheap labor-that wives were              the total. The relative rate of women who had never
viewed as full-time mothers. The current American fam-         married and were heading a family had doubled during
ily has a long way to go before it fully adjusts to these      this period .
new and shifting work patterns . The greatest changes             However, the rising incidence of families headed by
will be the reallocation of work responsibilities within       women is not due exclusively to increasing marital in-
households . A decrease of chores allocated along tradi-       stability or illegitimacy . Families headed by women in-
tional sexist lines coupled with women sharing more ef-        creased by nearly 2 million between 1940 and 1970 .
fectively in the family decision process are the primary       About two-fifths of the increase is attributed to the pro-
adjustments that will be made . These changes-unlike           pensity of women to form separate households rather
fads which come and go-will probably have some of              than share housing with relatives. This pattern contin-
the deepest and most lasting effects on the family insti-      ued during the 1970's, when more than half of the
tution and on American society. Instead of dissolution,        households with a female head were formed for this rea-
they offer real opportunities for improved, more stable,       son. Income-support programs also may have boosted
and richer lives within families .                             the growing ranks of women who head families, as did

more out-of-wedlock births and, of course, general pop-     women and 21 percent of black women.
ulation increase .
                                                            Economic problems. The transition from a husband-wife
Economic realities                                          family to head of a household often creates dire eco-
   Of the major differences that exist between house-       nomic problems which the women who head the new
holds headed by women and those of married couples,         households often cannot solve without outside aid . For
distinctions based on income are easiest to quantify .      the older age cohort, the average household income for
Poverty haunts only 1 of 19 husband-wife families and       white families that experienced this disruption declined
 1 of 9 families maintained by men ; but about 1 of 3       by 49 percent over the survey period . While the average
families headed by women live in destitution .              income of black families fell by only 38 percent, their
   Beyond the higher prevalence of poverty, the entire      income prior to disruption of the family was only about
income distribution of families headed by women is          two-thirds of the average for the white households . This
lower than that of other kinds of families . In 1979,       same condition is also true for women in the younger
about 4 of 5 families headed by women had earned in-        age cohort .
comes under $15,000, compared with 3 of 10 of all hus-
band-wife families and 1 of 3 families headed by men.       Employment patterns. Labor force patterns of women
   The median income of the families women head is          who experience marital disruption is quite different for
less than half that of husband-wife households . Where      whites and blacks for both the younger and older wom-
dependent children are involved, the median drops to        en . When their marriages ended, the older cohort of
one-third. If a female family head has a child under 6      white wives increased their labor force participation rate
years, her family income on average is only two-fifths of   from 58 percent to 70 percent . For black women, just
that for a household headed by a woman with no              the opposite happened : their rate fell from more than 80
youngsters .                                                percent to 69 percent . Transition patterns also differ for
   Coupled with this factor are the younger ages of the     black and white women concerning their seeking occu-
women who are heading families . About 4 of 7 of the        pational training . When they became family heads, the
children who live in a household headed by a woman          number of the older women who obtained training in-
have a mother who is under 35 years. These younger          creased by more than 40 percent for whites but fell by
women, who have a greater chance of having a child,         37 percent for blacks . For younger white women, the
represented 28 percent of all families headed by women      labor force participation rate climbed from 51 percent
in 1970. By 1979, this younger group had grown to rep-      to 68 percent after the disruption . Younger black wom-
resent 37 percent of the families headed by women.          en, unlike their older counterparts, experienced a de-
   National longitudinal data, which have followed fe-      cline in participation rates after divorce, but it rose
male cohorts for several years, have increased our          much less than that for the young white women-from
knowledge about families women head. Data tracking          46 percent to 53 percent . For younger white women af-
the same women-as they go through a dissolution of          ter divorce, the chances of resorting to training in-
husband-wife family and then try making it on their         creased by 23 percent, while for younger black women
own-give a clearer picture of this dynamic process          it fell by 13 percent .
than information based on cross-sectional estimates.           Even if a female family head lands a job, her earnings
The national longitudinal surveys at Ohio State Univer-     are not likely to make up for the income lost because a
sity included interviews with a nationally representative   husband has left . Average per capital income will de-
sample of more than 5,000 women under 25 years and          cline by 20 percent for white families and 13 percent for
30 to 44 years at the time of the first interview (1967     black families .'
and 1968, respectively) . These women were interviewed
annually or biennially, and the data provided a time        Transfer payments. Families headed by women depend
path of their experiences over 10 years . Some of the       on transfer payments as a major source of income.
most important features indicated by longitudinal data      About 16 percent of all white female heads and 48 per-
concerning families women . head are :'                     cent of black female heads receive public welfare pay-
                                                            ments . More than 23 percent of the white women who
 Temporary status. There is a large flow of women who       headed families, and 19 percent of the black women re-
move into and out of being heads of families, and few       ceived social security or disability payments . One-third
women remain in this condition for an extended period .     of the poor white female heads and more than 50 per-
Over the first 5 years, the surveys found that as many      cent of poor black female heads received at least half of
as 16 percent of all adult women sampled were heading       their household income from public income transfer
a household . However, only 9 percent were household        programs . On average, earnings by a female head pro-
heads during the entire period : 6 percent of the white     vided only about one-third of household income for

 MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW September 1981 a Working Wives and Mothers

families living in poverty and about three-fifths for                   come tax codes are a prime example: in 1979, the esti-
those above the poverty line .a                                         mated tax liability of 16 million couples exceeded $8
    Thus, whatever other advantages a woman perceives                   billion, solely because they were married. Even couples
in single parenthood over a bad marriage, most families                 with a relatively low family income pay a marriage tax
headed by women find the going very rough economi-                      penalty if there are several wage earners in the house-
cally. Even when they combine work with welfare and                     hold . The marriage tax penalty in 1980 for a couple
other transfer payments, many female heads of house-                    with a combined income of $40,000 was $1,900 (assum-
holds can barely lift their families out of poverty-and                 ing standard deductions), while for a $10,000-a-year
a significant number live below the poverty threshold .                 couple, the extra tax liability was more than $200 .
    The word family, at one time, evoked a picture of a                 Whatever its equity and costs, there is little evidence
husband, a wife, and their children living together in                  that the marriage tax has had a statistically significant
one household . Now, a variety of cameos surround the                   impact on marriage, but it may affect work decisions.
central picture. None of the cameos, however, portray                      Other laws (including social security) affecting family
the extended family that many analysts had anticipated                  income and work decisions are based on the assumption
because they believed a separated woman would return                    that the husband would work while the wife became a
to her parents' or grandparents' household, taking her                  full-time housewife. Social security laws also assume
children with her. An increasing percentage of never-                   that, once married, the couples would stay together .
married or formerly married mothers are heading their                   One problem with the social security system is that a
own households instead of living as a subfamily unit in                 wife's earnings result in higher total family benefits only
someone else's household, emphasizing the precarious                   if her entitlement exceeds 50 percent of her spouse's
status of families headed by women. In extended fami-                  benefits . In most cases, the two-earner couple pays far
lies, a divorced, separated, or never-married mother                   more into the system than a one-earner couple, but re-
could count on the financial and social support of other               ceives only a marginal increase in benefits .
adult family members to help provide for basic needs                      Many other social policies are based on family-related
and ease such problems as child care. Today, if a wom-                 assumptions which existed in a bygone age. But Ameri-
an decides, or is forced by circumstances, to separate or              can households have become highly pluralistic, and gov-
divorce, the chances are that she will have to head her                ernment programs will have to be attuned to the
own household.                                                         different needs and problems of various types of fami-
   There are some indications that the increase in the                 lies . A comprehensive family policy has been impossible
single-parent household will not be as swift in the                    to fashion because interested parties cannot agree on
1980'' as it was in the 1960's and 1970's . The view that              even the basic goals. While one policy may seem more
the woman should seek liberation outside a husband-                    dramatic, incremental reform of the already existing
wife family is not shared by the vast majority of female               system may be the most realistic approach to help fami-
family heads. Nor is it correct to conclude that those                 lies during this rough period of transition .
women who remain family heads do so by choice .                           Shifting work roles are altering family life, and chang-
When questioned, long-term female family heads most                    es in living arrangements are having a feedback effect on
often indicated that their current household structure is              labor markets. Whether the family is better off because
not their first choice .'                                              of the changes depends, in large measure, on personal
                                                                       value judgments. Public policies can ease the transition,
Policy changes needed
                                                                       but such policies should consider that there is no longer
  Social policies can have a significant impact on the                 one dominant family type . Despite problems, the family
work and living decisions of households, even those that               remains a resilient institution . Most Americans live in
are well above the poverty threshold. The Federal in-                  families, and will continue to do so .                    El


     Sandra L. Hofferth and Kristin A. Moore, "Women's Employ-         quences of Marital Breakdown," in Frank L. Mott, ed ., Women,
ment and Marriage," in Ralph W. Smith, ed ., The Subtle Revolution     Work, and Family (Lexington, Mass ., Lexington Books, 1978), pp .
(Washington, The Urban Institute, 1979), pp. 113-15 ; and Frank P.     123-24 .
Stafford, "Women's use of time converging with men's," Monthly La-
bor Review, December 1980, pp. 57-58.                                     ' Liz B. Shaw, Economic Consequences of Marital Disruption
   _                                                                   (Columbus, Ohio State University, Center for Human Resource Re-
     Frank L. Mott, The Socioeconomic Status of Households Headed by
                                                                       search, 1978), pp . 16 and 19 .
 Women (Washington, Government Printing Office, 1979), pp . 10, 29,
45, and 52 .                                                             `Christopher Lasch, Haven in a Heartless World. The Family
  ' Frank L. Mott and Sylvia F. Moore, "The Causes and Conse-          Besieged (New York, Basic Books, 1977), p. 162.


To top