VIEWS: 0 PAGES: 1 POSTED ON: 3/5/2013
Interception versus tracking when catching free-falling objects Pascal Prévost, Joe McIntyre, Patrice Senot, Alain Berthoz and Jean-Jacques Slotine LPPA, Collège de France – CNRS, Paris, France The main problem regarding the catching of a free-falling object by hand is to move the hand to the right place at right time. Furthermore, the projected force of impact between the hand and the object must be taken into account. To solve this problem with robots, a tracking strategy was chosen in which the tangential velocity of the robotic hand was matched to that of the flying object prior to closure of the grasp (Hong and Slotine, 1995). This strategy is advantageous, in that it 1) reduces the degrees-of-freedom, 2) increases the margin-of-error for the timing of hand closure and 3) reduces the relative momentum at impact. The goal of this study was to examine the strategies employed by human subjects when performing a similar free-falling catching task. Six subjects were asked to catch a bar dropped by the experimenter (2 heights) or by himself (1 height), with each hand. Bar and hand kinematics were captured by means of an optical 3D- system. We found that hand and bar velocities were not exactly matched in amplitude, but nevertheless were in the same direction at the moment of grasping. This suggests humans also adopt a tracking strategy, as opposed to a purely interception strategy, to catch a falling object with the hand. References Hong, W. & Slotine J.-J.E. (1995). Experiments in hand-eye coordination using active vision. Experimental Robotic IV, Sprinter-Verlag, Proceeding of the 4th International Symposium on Experimental Robotics, ISER’95, Stanford, Califonia, June 30-July-2.
Pages to are hidden for
"Title of Poster - Free"Please download to view full document