Britian War by EveryAvenue


									No. 1843
March 10, 2008
                                                                Published by The Heritage Foundation

                       Britain: A Central Front in the
                       War Against Islamist Terrorism
                                             Nile Gardiner, Ph.D.

    The recent conviction in London of the Muslim            estimated 2,000 unidentified terrorists operating in
fanatic known as “Osama bin London” and five of              Britain, for a total of up to 4,000 al-Qaeda–linked
his followers is a significant blow to Islamist terror-      operatives based in the United Kingdom. In a major
ism in the United Kingdom. In one of the biggest             speech last November,2 Jonathan Evans, Director
anti-terrorist trials in British history, Mohammed           General of the Security Service, outlined in stark
Hamid was found guilty of leading an al-Qaeda–               terms the nature and tactics of the enemy Britain
inspired terrorist cell and of running terrorist train-      is fighting:
ing camps on British soil with a view to sending                 It is important that we recognise an
recruits on to Afghanistan and East Africa. He has               uncomfortable truth: terrorist attacks we have
been jailed indefinitely.                                        seen against the UK are not simply random
    Hamid is, as a family member described him,                  plots by disparate and fragmented groups. The
“evil personified”1 and had a role in training the July          majority of these attacks, successful or
21, 2005, London bombers, who fortunately failed                 otherwise, have taken place because Al Qaida
in their attempt to emulate the carnage inflicted by             has a clear determination to mount terrorist
the 7/7 bombers two weeks earlier. Hamid’s lead                  attacks against the United Kingdom. This
accomplice, Atilla Ahmet, admitted to three charges              remains the case today, and there is no sign of
of soliciting murder and was a key figure at the                 it reducing. So although MI5 and the police
notorious Finsbury Park Mosque run by the fire-                  are investigating plots, and thwarting them, on
brand Muslim cleric Abu Hamza al-Masri, who is                   a continuing basis, we do not view them in
awaiting extradition to face trial in the United States          isolation. Al Qaida is conducting a deliberate
on terrorism charges.                                            campaign against us. It is the expression of a
    Hamid’s conviction is just one part of a large-              hostility towards the UK which existed long
scale war that British authorities are waging against            before September 11, 2001. It is evident in the
Islamist terrorists on the streets of Britain’s cities. It       wills and letters left behind by actual and
is a conflict that will have major ramifications for             would-be bombers. And it regularly forms
the wider war against terrorism across Europe, as                part of Al Qaida’s broadcast messages….
well as in the United States.
    The Terrorist Threat to Britain. The scale of the
terrorist threat to the U.K. is enormous. According                      This paper, in its entirety, can be found at:
to Britain’s domestic intelligence service, MI5, there            Produced by The Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom
are over 2,000 identified al-Qaeda–inspired terror-                         Published by The Heritage Foundation
ist suspects in the U.K., with up to 200 terrorist net-                        214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
                                                                               Washington, DC 20002–4999
works in operation. In addition, there are an                                  (202) 546-4400 •
                                                                 Nothing written here is to be construed as necessarily reflecting
                                                                   the views of The Heritage Foundation or as an attempt to
                                                                     aid or hinder the passage of any bill before Congress.
No. 1843                                        WebMemo                                                     March 10, 2008

   [T]errorists are methodically and intentionally                    The courageous RUSI paper notes “a loss in the
   targeting young people and children in this                    United Kingdom of confidence in our own identity,
   country. They are radicalising, indoctrinating                 values, constitution and institutions” and paints a
   and grooming young, vulnerable people to                       disturbing picture of “a fragmenting, post-Christian
   carry out acts of terrorism. This year, we have                society, increasingly divided about interpretations
   seen individuals as young as 15 and 16                         of its history, about its national aims, its values and
   implicated in terrorist-related activity.12                    its political identity.” The report points out that a
   Progress is being made by the security services                lack of integration among immigrant communities
in the fight against Islamist terrorism. British                  and a “mis-placed deference to multiculturalism”
authorities have been investigating no less than 30               have completely undercut the fight against extrem-
active terrorist plots3 and have foiled at least 5                ism. “The country’s lack of self-confidence,” it finds,
major attempted terrorist attacks since 9/11.                     “is in stark contrast to the implacability of its Islam-
According to the Home Office, over the past five                  ist terrorist enemy, within and without.”
years, British police have made over 1,200 terror-                    The report’s powerful conclusion should serve as
ism-related arrests, with more than 400 individu-                 a wake-up call to Britain’s political establishment,
als charged.4                                                     which for the past two decades has been sleepwalk-
   But the war Britain is fighting is being under-                ing toward disaster in the face of the Islamist mili-
mined by a culture of political correctness and the               tant threat:
damaging legacy of multiculturalism, as well as by                    The deep guarantee of real strength is our
the erosion of British national sovereignty within                    knowledge of who we are. Our loss of cultural
Europe, a decline in British military capability and                  self-confidence weakens our ability to develop
defense spending, and a reduced willingness to                        new means to provide for our security in the
project power abroad. The appalling comments                          face of new risks. Our uncertainty incubates
earlier this month by the Archbishop of Canter-                       the embryonic threats these risks represent.
bury, Rowan Williams, supporting the adoption of                      We look like a soft touch. We are indeed a soft
aspects of Sharia law into British law were a potent                  touch, from within and without.
symbol of the Left’s continuing shameful appease-                     Strengthening Britain’s Defenses. The Royal
ment of Islamist extremism in British society.                    United Services Institute is right to point out that
   The RUSI Report. The Royal United Services                     Britain’s survival depends upon a renewed faith in
Institute (RUSI), Britain’s most respected think tank             her own identity, traditions, beliefs, and culture,
on security and defense issues, recently issued a                 together with a commitment to rebuilding her
scathing indictment of Britain’s overall ability to               armed forces. Crippling defense cuts under the
combat Islamist terrorism. The report by Gwyn                     Labour government have seriously depleted British
Prins and the Marquess of Salisbury, “Risk Threat                 naval power and reduced the British Army to its
and Security: The Case of the United Kingdom,”5 is                smallest level in centuries.
a must-read for anyone concerned about the current                    Britain must be willing to invest at a minimum 3
state of America’s closest ally.                                  percent of GDP on defense, and ideally 4 percent, to

1. “Mohammed Hamid is ‘evil personified’,” The Daily Telegraph, February 27, 2008, at
2. Jonathan Evans, Address to the Society of Editors, Manchester, November 5, 2007, at
3. Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller, former Director General of the Security Service, “The International Terrorist Threat to the
   UK,” Speech to Queen Mary’s College, London, November 9, 2006, at
4. U.K. Home Office, Terrorism and the Law, February 2008, at
5. Gwyn Prins and Robert Salisbury, Risk, Threat and Security: The Case of the United Kingdom, Royal United Services Institute,
   February 2008, at

page 2
No. 1843                                     WebMemo                                                  March 10, 2008

ensure that her military operations can be sustained              In addition, a concerted effort must be made to
across the globe. Without such a commitment, the              cut the terrorist supply routes that run from Pakistan
U.K. can only expect to decline as a power, wield             to Britain. As MI5 chief Jonathan Evans pointed out,
less influence diplomatically, and face an increas-           “over the last five years much of the command, con-
ingly dangerous world from a position of weakness.            trol and inspiration for attack planning in the UK has
It is vital that Britain maintain its commitments to          derived from Al Qaida’s remaining core leadership in
both Iraq and Afghanistan, crucial theaters of oper-          the tribal areas of Pakistan—often using young Brit-
ation in a long global war that the West is waging            ish citizens to mount the actual attack.”7
against the forces of militant Islam. There can be no             A War Britain Must Win. In many ways, Britain
doubt that the withdrawal of British and American             today is the central front in the battle against Islam-
forces from the Middle East or South Asia would               ist militancy in Europe, and developments there
hand a huge propaganda victory to al-Qaeda.                   will be closely watched by al-Qaeda’s high com-
    On the domestic front, Britain must take steps            mand, keen to gain a foothold in the West. Al-
to further strengthen existing anti-terrorist legisla-        Qaeda can be defeated in Britain, and the conviction
tion, including greater powers for police to detain           of Mohammed Hamid and his murderous cohorts is
suspected terrorists without charge for periods               an important strike against some of the group’s key
longer than the currently allowed 28 days and an              British-based supporters.
accelerated process for deporting or extraditing                  This success, though, will have to be emulated
“preachers of hate.” Militant Islamist groups such            against thousands of other Islamist terrorists based
as Hizb-ut-Tahrir (the Islamic Party of Liberation)           in the U.K., who must be hunted down as part of a
should have no place in British society and should            long conflict that may last for decades. It is a war
be included on the government’s list of proscribed            that has to be waged and ultimately won by a self-
organizations. Conservative Party leader David                confident nation that believes in the rightness of its
Cameron is right to call for the banning of this              cause and is willing to defend the Western traditions
dangerous movement,6 already outlawed in Egypt                of liberty and freedom, whether on the streets of
and Pakistan, which supports the establishment                London, Kabul, or Baghdad.
of a Muslim caliphate, or empire. The U.K. should
also resist efforts by the European Union to                      —Nile Gardiner is Director of the Margaret
restrict British anti-terrorist efforts and should            Thatcher Center for Freedom, a division of the Kathryn
withdraw from the European Convention on                      and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International
Human Rights (ECHR).                                          Studies, at the Heritage Foundation. Erica Munkwitz
                                                              assisted with research for this paper.

6. David Cameron MP, Speech to the Community Security Trust, March 4, 2008, at
7. Evans, Address to the Society of Editors.

                                                                                                               page 3

To top