Missouri Democrats Call for Gun Confiscation

							Missouri Democrats Call for Gun
Confiscation
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
February 14, 2013

The denial is over: Government is
coming for the guns
Democrats around the country are in a race
to destroy the Second Amendment and the
latest outrage is going down in Missouri.
Democrats Rory Ellinger and Jill Schupp
have introduced House Bill 545, a law that
with the stroke of a pen will turn thousands
of law-abiding Missourians into class C
felons. It will ban the possession, sale,
transfer or manufacture of semi-automatic
rifles and magazines capable of holding
more than ten rounds.
The law is in effect de facto confiscation
demanding the “surrender” of firearms to
the government.
“Any person who, prior to the effective date
of this law, was legally in possession of an
assault weapon or large capacity magazine
shall have ninety days from such effective
date to do any of the following without
being subject to prosecution,” the proposed
law states.” Residents will be ordered to
“remove the assault weapon or large
capacity magazine from the state of
Missouri… Render the assault weapon permanently inoperable; or… Surrender the assault weapon or
large capacity magazine to the appropriate law enforcement agency for destruction, subject to specific
agency regulations.”
Missouri’s proposed law is strikingly similar to one recently enacted in New York:
“If you own a large capacity magazine greater than 10 round capacity that was a grandfathered
magazine as a result of the 1994 Federal Assault Weapon Ban, within a year, you must do one of the
following: dispose of it to another person outside New York State, surrender it to law enforcement
officials, or permanently alter such to only accept 7 rounds.” (emphasis added)
Following California Senator Dianne Feinstein’s high-profile effort to introduce legislation calling for
outlawing semi-automatic firearms and a national “gun safety” campaign initiated by the Obama
administration, Democrats around the country began calling for government confiscation of firearms
and the destruction of the Second Amendment.
Feinstein, a long time opponent of the
Second Amendment, told CBS in 1995 that
the ultimate plan is to have “Mr. and Mrs.
America” turn in their guns to the
government.
In December, New York governor Andrew
Cuomo began an aggressive effort to restrict
firearms in the state and confiscate the
weapons of citizens who do not comply
with retroactive rules on so-called assault
weapons.
“Confiscation could be an option.
Mandatory sale to the state could be an
option. Permitting could be an option —
keep your gun but permit it,” Cuomo said.
Prior to passage, Cuomo declared the
Second Amendment “is a scourge on
society” as Democrats said the legislation
does not endanger the constitutional right to
own firearms.
On January 13, 2013, H.R. 226 was
introduced in the House of Representatives
by Connecticut Democrat Rep. Rosa
DeLauro. The bill will amend the 1986 IRS
code and allow a credit if taxpayers
“surrender” their guns to the government.
Cited as the “Support Assault Firearms
Elimination and Reduction for our Streets
Act,” the proposed legislation represents
another effort to convince citizens that they
must voluntarily turn in their guns as a civic
duty and to do their part to reduce “gun
violence” and protect children, as Obama
said on January 16.
“The bill is yet more evidence that federal
and state governments are now pulling out
all stops short of door-to-door confiscation
in their coordinated effort to disarm the
American people,” we reported at the time.
Earlier this month, Democrats worked
feverishly on “a facsimile of the President’s
plan, which was also the impetus behind the
bevy of gun control bills that are now
circulating the Senate,” S.H. Blannelberry
wrote.
Wash. State Bill Would Make Almost All
Gun Owners Criminals
Mikael Thalen
Examiner
February 14, 2013




Washington state Sens. Ed Murray (D), Jeanne Kohl-Welles (D) and Adam Kline (D) have introduced
new gun control legislation that goes far above and beyond what anyone would consider a simple sales
ban.
The bill, S.B. 5737, proposes “banning the sale of assault weapons.” According to the legislation,
an “assault weapon” is any semiautomatic pistol, pump-action rifle or shotgun that can accept a
detachable magazine, with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds. Any magazine that
accepts over 10 rounds itself will also be banned.
Also included in the definition is any rifle or shotgun with a pistol grip, a stock of any kind, a muzzle
brake or muzzle compensator. The bill also prohibits the manufacturing, possessing, purchasing, selling
or transferring of an assault weapons
“conversion kit.”
In order to continue to possess a so-called
assault weapon that was owned before the
assumed passing of the legislation, the person
must “safely and securely” store the assault
weapon and allow the sheriff of the county to,
no more than once per year, conduct an
inspection to “ensure compliance,” despite
some apparent civil liberties implications
related to the Fourth Amendment.
Not to mention the manpower, time and
                                                             money that would be needed to search tens
                                                             of thousands of Washington homes; it could
                                                             prove to be very difficult and possibly
                                                             divert much needed manpower from
                                                             conducting actual police duties, especially
                                                             in light of shrinking police department
                                                             budgets.
                                                          The bill also gives no definition of what
                                                          “safe and secure” storage consists of. The
                                                          ownership and storage may only be done on
                                                          property owned or immediately controlled
                                                          by that person or while engaged in the
                                                          “legal use” of the assault weapon at a duly
                                                          licensed firing range. The bill does,
                                                          however, exempt possession rules if the
weapon is about to be “permanently relinquished to a law enforcement agency.”
Any person who, after the effective date of the section, acquires title to an assault weapon by
inheritance, bequest or succession must within thirty days either dispose of the weapon or have it
permanently disabled so that it is incapable of discharging a projectile. Failure to comply will result in
a class C felony.
Marshals, sheriffs, prison or jail wardens or their deputies, or other law enforcement officers of the
state or another state will be exempt. Members of the armed forces of the United States, National
Guard and organized services, are exempt when on duty. Also, any federal agent “allowed” to own an
assault weapon is exempt as well.

This legislation is similar to a bill
introduced by California Sen. Diane
Feinstein (D) whose legislation would
ban over 120 specifically named
firearms.
Others such as President Obama and
Attorney General Eric Holder have come
out recently pushing for gun control.
Holder gave a stern warning to gun
traffickers, despite President Obama and
him being involved in Operation Fast &
Furious, a program that allowed tens of
thousands of firearms to be given to drug
cartels that took the lives of countless
Mexicans and most notably U.S. Border
Patrol Agent Brian Terry.
The program’s supposed intent was to track where guns went in Mexico, but government emails leaked
to CBS News showed that the intent appeared to be to use the resulting deaths to blame American gun
owners and push gun control.
Video of Holder claiming that American’s needed to be “brainwashed” to be anti-gun was also recently
uncovered.
           Dorner, Drones and the NDAA
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
February 14, 2013




Following the incineration of cop killer suspect Chris Dorner by the San Bernardino police, a lobbyist
group dedicated to inserting drones in police work used the event to push the wares of their clients.
“Had a [drone] been able to be used in that environment, who knows what could have
happened,” said Peter Bale, chairman of the board for the Association for Unmanned Vehicle
Systems International.
Mr. Bale went on to point a finger at “privacy advocates, which [have] slowed widespread use of
drones,” according to US News & World Report. “We believe the FAA should focus on their core
mission, which is safety,” he said.
The unprecedented deployment of military and surveillance drones has been “delayed many months
because the FAA is being pulled into the privacy debate,” in other words a debate over the Fourth
Amendment, which guards against unreasonable searches and seizures and requires a warrant
supported by probable cause.
Cops all around the country are chomping at the bit to use drones, as this interactive map shows. In
addition to tracking down alleged cop killers, police want to use the technology for more mundane and
practical purposes in service to the state – for instance, snooping on folks exercising the First
Amendment. In January, NYPD Commissioner Ray Kelly said he would be interested in using drones
for monitoring crowds and large demonstrations, according to NBC in New York.
But as former Constitution Party presidential candidate Chuck Baldwin notes, the introduction of
drones – machines used to kill untried supposed terrorists (and their families and no small number of
innocent bystanders) – in the United States means the government is ready to use military force against
the American people.
“Your federal government — along with numerous local and State police agencies — is preparing to
use instruments of war against the citizens of the United States,” Baldwin wrote last year. “And
numerous local and State police agencies are standing in line to participate. I ask you, do the US
Congress, the FAA, and our local and State authorities plan to arm these drones with more than
surveillance cameras (as if that’s not bad enough)? Should we expect that the drones that will be flying
over our neighborhoods would be armed with machine guns and missiles?”
Add to this chilling prospect the fact that Obama’s NDAA is similar to Hitler’s 1933 Discriminatory
Decrees the SS and Gestapo used to arrest, imprison and execute thousands of political enemies
without probable cause. Obama’s version was recently justified by a Justice Department memo that
states “action” (killing) can be taken against individuals even if there is no clear intelligence indicating
they are engaged in active plots against the U.S.
Obama’s killing machines operating in America were legalized when he signed in the NDAA at
the stroke of midnight, December 31, 2011. In addition to rendition, the NDAA allows for the
establishment of six national test sites where drones – including MQ-9 Reaper drones flying out
of Hancock Field in New York – will fly through civil air space. The government is busily
preparing the groundwork to normalize the use of drones in the United States and the Justice
Department has provided the quasi-legal groundwork for their use in assassination (in direct
violation of the Constitution).
It was mistakenly reported that a Customs and Border Patrol drone was used in the search for the
alleged cop killer Dorner. Despite the denial, the LAPD told the Daily Express cops were “using all the
tools at [their] disposal” and admitted they believe “thermal imaging cameras” used by drones are very
useful in police work (including police work directed against political enemies, as the NYPD pointed
out).
It is only a matter of time before the FAA and the government allow law enforcement to normalize the
use of drones – not strictly for manhunts and murder investigations, but for all manner of police work,
including police work against official enemies.
It is a thin line separating the extrajudicial murder of “senior operational leaders” working for official
enemies in Pakistan and those singled out as national security threats in the United States (who are,
according to the Department of Homeland Security, “rightwing extremists” colluding with “returning
veterans”). “The police state that J. Edgar Hoover, Oliver North, and Dick Cheney put in place is being
fully embraced by Obama, the Department of Homeland Security, the TSA, FBI and CIA, as well as
many local police neanderthals all across America – it is as though they are drooling for some action,
and for a chance for them to show the rest of the world just how tough they are,” writes Scott
Lazarowitz.
It is simply foolhardy to believe the police state will not use all the tools at their disposal – including
drones equipped not only with thermal imaging cameras but hellfire missiles and Quadrotor Flying
Machine Guns designed to take out both al-Qaeda thousands of miles away and future Dorners and
other enemies of the state in California, Alabama or anywhere else in the United States.
Chris Dorner Was Executed - Fire Set by Police VIDEO BELOW
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=cx4MJhSRun8

Senator Lee and Judge Napolitano Discuss NDAA VIDEO BELOW
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=a2EynpMPFOs


      http://www.infowars.com/