Docstoc

Plaintiff Opposition to Notify Authorities. Ronald D. Green Objects to Authorities Being Notified

Document Sample
Plaintiff Opposition to Notify Authorities. Ronald D. Green Objects to Authorities Being Notified Powered By Docstoc
					      Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL Document 73                  Filed 02/08/13 Page 1 of 2



 1 Ronald D. Green, NV Bar #7360
     Randazza Legal Group
 2 6525 W. Warm Springs Road, Suite 100
     Las Vegas, NV 89118
 3 888-667-1113
 4 305-437-7662 fax
     ecf@randazza.com
 5
     Attorney for Plaintiffs
 6 MARC J. RANDAZZA, JENNIFER RANDAZZA, and NATALIA RANDAZZA
 7
 8                                UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 9                                       DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10                                                     )
   MARC J. RANDAZZA, an individual,                    )   Case No. 2:12-cv-02040
11 JENNIFER RANDAZZA, an individual, and               )
   NATALIA RANDAZZA, a minor,                          )   PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO
12                                                     )   DEFENDANT COX’S MOTION
                    Plaintiffs,                        )   REQUESTING COURT NOTIFY
13                                                         AUTHORITIES REGARDING
                                                       )
14          vs.                                        )   PLAINTIFF MARC RANDAZZA
                                                       )
15 CRYSTAL COX, an individual, and ELIOT               )
     BERNSTEIN, an individual,                         )
16                                                     )
17                  Defendants.                        )

18
            Plaintiffs Marc J. Randazza, Jennifer Randazza, and Natalia Randazza, through counsel,
19
     hereby submit their Opposition to Defendant Crystal Cox’s Motion Requesting Court Notify
20
     Investigators about Plaintiff Marc Randazza. (ECF 60).
21
            The Court already has denied a substantially identical request from Defendant Cox. (ECF
22
     No. 27) This issue already has been decided by the Court and cannot be re-adjudicated.
23
            Furthermore, Cox’s Instant Motion supports Plaintiffs’ contention that Cox is abusing her
24
     ECF privileges. Immediately after Cox’s demand that the Court investigate Mr. Randazza was
25
     denied, Cox filed this Motion, which requests virtually identical relief. Plaintiffs request that the
26
     Motion be denied.
27
28
                                                      1
Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL Document 73   Filed 02/08/13 Page 2 of 2

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:50
posted:2/11/2013
language:
pages:2