Document Sample



Benghazi CIA Compound Attack Explained-
Behind the Lies to Start World War 3

Benghazi Explained- Interview With an
'Intelligence Insider'
Chaffetz- State Dept Hiding Benghazi Survivors

WHITE HOUSE INSIDER- 'Barack Obama – The
Butcher of Benghazi'

Documents Released Pertaining to Security at
the Bengazi CIA Villa

Photos of Bengazi CIA Villa Before and After
the 9-11-12 Attack
Benghazi CIA Compound Attack
Explained- Behind the Lies to Start
World War 3
Please comment on this article at Canada Free Press
By Douglas J. Hagmann
2 December 2012: Author’s note: This is a special supplement of a multi-part
interview with a government insider intimately familiar with the events that took place
in Benghazi. It is important to note that the information contained in this series was
developed from interviews that spanned over 100 hours. My source requested that the
following information be written separately due to its importance.
DH: You told me that you wanted to talk about the lies behind Benghazi, said
it is critical for everyone to understand the reason for the lies. and asked that
we do this separately. Go ahead.
II: It’s about the lie, and once you understand it, it becomes extremely revealing. It’s
about what the public has been told from the very beginning. Do you realize that a lot
of people, especially Obama’s associates and supporters do not believe that they’ve
been lied to? Do you understand that much of the public does not believe that they
were lied to? Like a lot of us, you’re in this thing so deep that we forget not everyone
even believes they’ve been lied to. They’re certainly not going to hear about it in the
media. To understand how deep this goes, how important it is, and why it is so
important, we’ve got to go back to the very beginning.
Think back to when we were first told that Ambassador Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen
Dougherty, Tyrone Woods were killed in Benghazi. The media reported that Stevens
and the others were killed in an attack on the American consulate in Benghazi. Every
major media outlet identified the location of the attack as an American consulate, much
like this Reuters report and this from The Washington Times. But there was no U.S.
consulate in Benghazi, so where did this information originate?
DH: Didn’t the administration call it a consulate?
II: Exactly. Our embassies and consulate offices are directly under the control of the
U.S. State Department. They are areas of sovereign territory. Consulate offices are like
satellite offices to each embassy, and they are located in convenient geographic
locations in other countries to assist people with routine or minor matters, saving them
a trip to the actual embassy. Consulates are easily identifiable and all have U.S. flags
flying prominently for easy identification. A listing of U.S. embassies and consulate
offices in other countries can be found on the State Department web site. Just about
everyone working at State knows the locations of the embassies and consulates, as do
most of our leaders in the executive branch.
So from the outset, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama certainly knew, without any
doubt, that there was no consulate or diplomatic mission in Benghazi. None. In fact, on
August 27, 2012, just 15 days before the attack in Benghazi, Ambassador Chris Stevens
ceremoniously opened the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli with the U.S. State Department
issuing press releases and official statements. Tripoli was the only diplomatic mission in
Libya – period. And it was just established.
So one of the very first lies was to deliberate misidentify or improperly characterize the
compound in Benghazi as a consulate. Was there an American flag flying outside of this
compound? No. Was any diplomatic legitimate business being conducted at this
compound? No. But they called it a consulate to draw attention away from the fact this
was a CIA base of operations.
It was located in a relatively rural area, and it consisted of a residence and a separate
“annex” located about 1800 feet away. By car, the annex was just over a mile away. It
was difficult to find, too. People coming from Tripoli to this compound often got turned
around, even with the help of a GPS.
So the very first thing everyone must understand is that the administration, including
Barack Obama and others in the executive branch, and the State Department, including
Hillary Clinton (her official statement identified the compound as a mission,
suggesting a ‘diplomatic mission’) knew that this compound served no legitimate
diplomatic purpose. That’s the first lie.
DH: We now know that it was a CIA compound located in a somewhat rural
area and not identifiable as U.S. owned or operated.
II: Correct. So think about this. The compound was unmarked, operationally discreet,
located in a rural area and difficult to find. How did a few hundred protesters suddenly
gather at this location on the evening of 9/11? How did they know where to go, if this
was not an embassy or consulate? More to the point, how is it possible that anyone in
any official capacity in this administration could realistically describe the attack in terms
of a protest gone bad, even at the first reports of trouble? They could not. This was a
deliberate lie to the American people.
So how is it that U.S. Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice, five days after the attack and
after much of the initial dust settled, appeared on five national news shows and still
attributed the murders of Americans as a result of protests? Who told her to do that?
And, she continued to blame the murders on an obscure internet video. Why?
DH: They have since publicly reclassified the description of the location.
II: They had to because they could not continue to call the CIA operations center an
embassy or consulate. But they have yet to offer any reasonable explanation for what
happened there. Barack Obama has yet to look the family members of Tyrone Woods,
Sean Smith, or Glen Dougherty in the eyes and tell the truth. He has yet to tell
Americans the truth about the events of 9/11, and the reason for the lies, which
continue through today. No one has stepped up to tell the truth. We have only seen
denials reinforced by distractions., They continue to lie to this day. Who are they lying
to and what is the logical reason for the lies?
They are only lying to the American people. All other governments know what’s going
on. And most importantly, the reason they are continuing to lie is to cover up their
plans as they are moving forward with their agenda. Everyone must understand
how important this is. The Obama plan continues. No one is stopping them or this
agenda. And in case you have any questions about what this agenda is, let me explain
it clearly and concisely.
Obama, Clinton, their foreign policy advisors and the people involved in this
agenda intend to start a war that will make Afghanistan and Iraq look like a
small police action by comparison. They are going to start a war that will likely
grow from a regional war to a global war, or WW III. Afghanistan ‘imploded’ when
attacked, as did Iraq. Syria will not, it will explode. Do the American people
understand this?
Until now, everyone has been focused on the ‘little lies.’ The security, the
misidentification of the CIA compound, the timeline, and on and on. They want us to
focus on the little lies so they can pull off the BIG LIE. The big lie being told is that the
U.S. is merely providing minimal support, including humanitarian aid to the Syrians so
they can defend themselves from Assad. That’s the big lie that covers up what they are
really doing in the region.
The CIA compound in Benghazi was a logistics hub for weapons, but not only weapons
from Libya. Weapons ordered by and destined for other countries, like Saudi Arabia, the
UAE and other countries, knowing the plan, were allowing the weapons to be diverted,
with Libya acting as the central shipping hub. When Assad falls and U.S. troops are
called in for ground support, who will they be fighting? The Syrian army? No, they will
be fighting the Iranian army, the Russian army and the Chinese army. Why? Because
Iran, Russia and China all have a stake in the region. Putin called Syria his red line in
the sand, and stated that WW III will start in Syria, not Iran.
Benghazi is a moving target of little lies that serve as cover for the big lie. Are
Americans onboard?

Statement by Secretary Clinton on the Attack in Benghazi
Press Statement
Hillary Rodham Clinton Secretary of State
Washington, DC
September 11, 2012
I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. As we
work to secure our personnel and facilities, we have confirmed that one of our State
Department officers was killed. We are heartbroken by this terrible loss. Our thoughts
and prayers are with his family and those who have suffered in this attack.
This evening, I called Libyan President Magariaf to coordinate additional support to
protect Americans in Libya. President Magariaf expressed his condemnation and
condolences and pledged his government’s full cooperation.
Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory
material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to
denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes
back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any
justification for violent acts of this kind.
In light of the events of today, the United States government is working with partner
countries around the world to protect our personnel, our missions, and American
citizens worldwide.

Libyans burn U.S. Consulate in Benghazi; U.S. official

Egyptian protesters climb the walls of the U.S. Embassy during a protest in Cairo on Tuesday, Sept. 11, 2012. (AP
Photo/Nasser Nasser)

By Ashish Kumar Sen

The Washington Times

Tuesday, September 11, 2012

A U.S. official was killed and others injured when an armed mob attacked the U.S. Consulate in Libya’s
eastern port city of Benghazi on Tuesday.
The building has burned down, according to multiple sources in Libya.
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton condemned “in the strongest terms” the attack.
Mrs. Clinton confirmed that one State Department officer had been killed.
“We are heartbroken by this terrible loss,” she said.
Mrs. Clinton spoke on the phone with Libyan National Assembly President Mohamed Yousef Al-Megariaf
to coordinate protection of Americans in his country.
The mob in Benghazi was angry over a video reportedly produced in the U.S., which they said was
insulting to Islam’s prophet, Muhammad.
“Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the
Internet,” Mrs. Clinton said.
The U.S. deplores “any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. … But let me be clear:
There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind,” she added.
Earlier, State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland blamed “a group of militants” for the attack.
“We are working with the Libyans now to secure the compound,” she said in a statement on Tuesday
“We condemn in strongest terms this attack on our diplomatic mission,” she added.
In Egypt’s capital, Cairo, protesters stormed the U.S. Embassy and tore down the flag.
This is the second time the U.S. mission in Benghazi has been attacked.
In June, a bomb exploded outside the U.S. diplomatic mission soon after the U.S. confirmed the death of
Abu Yahya al-Libi, a Libyan-born cleric and al Qaeda operative, in a drone attack in Pakistan.
Al Qaeda leader confirmed al-Libi’s death in a message delivered on Tuesday to mark the 11th
anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the U.S.
The revolution against Moammar Gadhafi’s regime first started in Benghazi in February of 2011. The
uprising quickly spread across Libya and toppled the 42-year-old dictatorship of Gadhafi, who was killed
in the custody of rebels in his hometown of Sirte on Oct. 20 last year.

About the Author

Ashish Kumar Sen

Ashish Kumar Sen is a reporter covering foreign policy and international developments for The Washington Times.
    Prior to joining The Times, Mr. Sen worked for publications in Asia and the Middle East. His work has appeared in a number
    of publications and online news sites including the British Broadcasting Corp., Asia Times Online and Outlook magazine.

    Obama vows to track down ambassador's
   inShar e0

   Share this

   Email

   Print

   Intrepid U.S. envoy Stevens nurtured Libyan democracy
    Wed, Sep 12 2012
   Smoke, confusion and a missing ambassador in Libya attack
    Wed, Sep 12 2012
   Obama vows justice after U.S. envoy killed in Libya
    Wed, Sep 12 2012
   U.S.-trained engineer picked as Libya's next premier
    Wed, Sep 12 2012
   Top U.S. military officer calls pastor over film
    Wed, Sep 12 2012
   U.S. evacuates staff from Benghazi, cuts Tripoli embassy staff
    Wed, Sep 12 2012
   New York police add security in wake of Libya protests
    Wed, Sep 12 2012

   Welcome home to Burning Man

   World »
   Libya »
   Middle East Turmoil »


    U.S. ambassador to Libya killed in consulate attack
    Wed, Sep 12 2012
   Obama on Libya attack: "Justice will be done"
   Clinton condemns attack on embassy in Libya
   Gunmen attack and set fire to U.S. consulate
   U.S. staff dies in Libya clash
1 of 22. A protester reacts as the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi is seen in flames during a protest by an armed group said to
have been protesting a film being produced in the United States September 11, 2012.
Credit: Reuters/Esam Al-Fetori (

By Matt Spetalnick and Hadeel Al Shalchi
WASHINGTON/BENGHAZI, Libya | Wed Sep 12, 2012 7:49pm EDT

 (Reuters) - President Barack Obama branded the killing of the U.S.
ambassador to Libya and three other Americans an "outrageous
attack" on Wednesday and vowed to track down the perpetrators,
while ordering a tightening of diplomatic security worldwide.
The ambassador, Christopher Stevens, and the other Americans were killed after Islamist gunmen
attacked the U.S. consulate and a safe house refuge in Benghazi on Tuesday night. The attackers
were part of a mob blaming America for a film they said insulted the Prophet Mohammad.
The violence in the eastern city, a cradle of Libya's U.S.-backed uprising against Muammar Gaddafi
last year, came on the anniversary of al Qaeda's attacks on the United States on September 11,
2001. Another assault was mounted on the U.S. embassy in Cairo in which protesters, who included
Islamists and teenage soccer fans, tore down and burned a U.S. flag.
U.S. government officials said the Benghazi attack may have been planned in advance and there
were indications that members of a militant faction calling itself Ansar al Sharia - which translates as
Supporters of Islamic Law - may have been involved.
They also said some reporting from the region suggested that members of Al-Qaeda's north Africa-
based affiliate, known as Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, may have been involved.
"It bears the hallmarks of an organized attack," one U.S. official said. However, some U.S. officials
cautioned against assuming that the attacks were deliberately organized to coincide with the
September 11 anniversary.
The violence in Benghazi and Cairo threatened to spread to other Muslim countries on Wednesday.
A U.S. official said Washington had ordered the evacuation of all U.S. personnel from Benghazi to
Tripoli and was reducing staffing in the capital to emergency levels.
Police fired teargas at angry demonstrators outside the U.S. embassy in Tunisia and several
hundred people gathered in front of the U.S. embassy in Sudan. In Morocco, a few dozen protesters
burned American flags and chanted slogans near the U.S. consulate in Casablanca.
Obama vowed on Wednesday to bring the Benghazi killers to justice. He called the attack
"outrageous and shocking" but insisted it would not threaten relations with Libya's new elected
The president said he had ordered an increase in security at U.S. diplomatic posts around the globe.
A U.S. official said a Marine anti-terrorist security team was being sent to Libya to boost security
The attacks could alter U.S. attitudes towards the wave of revolutions across the Arab world, which
toppled secularist authoritarian leaders in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia, bringing Islamists to power.
The violence could also have an impact on the closely-fought U.S. presidential election campaign.
Mitt Romney, Obama's rival in the November vote, criticized the president's response to the crisis.
He said the timing of a statement from the U.S. embassy in Cairo denouncing "efforts by misguided
individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims" made Obama look weak as protesters were
attacking U.S. missions.
He said it was "disgraceful" to be seen to be apologizing for American values of free speech.
Obama's campaign accused Romney of scoring political points at a time of national tragedy.
Images of ambassador Stevens purportedly taken after he died circulated on the Internet. One
image showed him being carried, with a white shirt pulled up and a cut on his forehead.
Libya's Deputy Interior Minister Wanis Al-Sharif said U.S. staff were rushed to a Benghazi safe
house after the initial attack on the consulate and an evacuation plane with U.S. commando units
then arrived from Tripoli to evacuate them from the safe house.
"It was supposed to be a secret place and we were surprised the armed groups knew about it. There
was shooting," Sharif said. Two U.S. personnel were killed there, he said. Two other people were
killed at the main consular building and between 12 and 17 wounded.
The attack raised questions about the future U.S. diplomatic presence in Libya, relations between
Washington and Tripoli, and the unstable security situation after Gaddafi's overthrow.
Witnesses said the mob included tribesmen, militia and other gunmen. Hamam, a 17-year-old who
took part in the attack, said Ansar al-Sharia cars arrived at the start of the protest but left once
fighting started.
"The protesters were running around the compound just looking for Americans, they just wanted to
find an American so they could catch one," he said.
"We started shooting at them, and then some other people also threw hand-made bombs over the
fences and started the fires in the buildings," he said.
"There was some Libyan security for the embassy outside but when the hand-made bombs went off
they ran off and left." Hamam said he saw an American die in front of him in the mayhem that
ensued. He said the body was covered in ash.
The "Innocence of Muslims," the film blamed for provoking the violence, was the work of a California-
based Israeli filmmaker Sam Bacile, according to a report by the Associated Press.
It portrays Mohammad as a fool, a philanderer and a religious fake and in one clip posted on
YouTube, he was shown in an apparent sexual act with a woman. For many Muslims it is
blasphemous even to show a depiction of the Prophet.
Bacile, who described himself to AP as an Israeli Jew, spoke to the agency from hiding on Tuesday.
He said that the film, which cost $5 million to make, was intended as a political statement and was
financed by more than 100 Jewish donors.
Egypt's Coptic Orthodox Church, meanwhile, condemned Copts living abroad who it said had
financed "the production of a film insulting the Prophet Mohammad". About a 10th of Egypt's 83
million people are Christian.
Western countries denounced the Benghazi killings and Russia expressed deep concern, saying the
episode underscored the need for global cooperation to fight "the evil of terrorism."
Many Muslim states focused their condemnation on the film and will be concerned about preventing
a repeat of the fallout seen after publication in a Danish newspaper of cartoons of the Prophet
Mohammad. This touched off riots in the Middle East, Africa and Asia in 2006 in which at least 50
people died.
Afghan President Hamid Karzai called the making of the movie a "devilish act" but said he was
certain those involved in its production were a very small minority.
The U.S. embassy in Kabul appealed to Afghan leaders for help in "maintaining calm" and
Afghanistan shut down the YouTube site so Afghans would not be able to see the film.
General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the U.S. military's Joint Chiefs of Staff, took the unusual
step of telephoning a radical Florida Pastor, Terry Jones, and asking him to withdraw his support for
the film. Earlier provocative acts by Jones, like publicly burning a Koran, had sparked Muslim unrest.
In Egypt, Prime Minister Hisham Kandil called on Washington to act against the film's makers for
stirring up strife but condemned the violence saying that they had "no relation to the (U.S.)
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the attack was the work of a "small and savage group."
Abdel-Monem Al-Hurr, spokesman for Libya's Supreme Security Committee, said Libyan security
forces came under heavy fire and "were not prepared for the intensity of the attack."
Libya's interim government has struggled to impose its authority on a myriad of armed groups that
refused to lay down their weapons and often take the law into their own hands.
Security experts say the area around Benghazi is host to a number of Islamist militant groups who
oppose any Western presence in Muslim countries.
U.S. ambassadors in such volatile countries as Libya have tight security, usually travelling in well-
protected convoys. Diplomatic missions are normally protected by Marines or other special forces.
Tributes poured in to honor Stevens, who said in a video posted on the embassy website of his
involvement in the Libyan revolution: "I was thrilled to watch the Libyan people stand up and demand
their rights."
Stevens, who was 52, grew up in California, graduated from Berkeley and worked in North Africa as
a Peace Corps volunteer. He taught English in Morocco before joining the foreign service where he
worked in the Middle East and North Africa.
The worst-case scenario for Western governments is that the spate of recent unrest in Libya could
be the start of an Iraq-style insurgency by Islamist militants. That could hit oil exports as the energy
sector depends on foreign workers.
However, security analysts say an insurgency is unlikely to gain the kind of traction it had in Iraq,
mainly because Western states have no military presence in Libya.
(Additional reporting by Samia Nakhoul in Beirut, Marie-Louise Gumuchian in Tripoli, Hadeel Al
Shalchi in Tripoli, Sarah N. Lynch, Arshad Mohammed, Andrew Quinn, Matt Spetalnick, Steve
Holland and Mark Hosenball in Washington, and Reuters reporters in Cairo and Benghazi; Writing
by David Brunnstrom and Peter Millership)

Administration is engaged in a massive cover-up

Benghazi explained: Interview
with an “Intelligence Insider”
- Doug Hagmann (Bio and Archives) Thursday, November 29, 2012
(47) Comments | Print friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
Benghazi, Libya CIA Station

Benghazi: Behind the scenes (Part II)

This is part one of a multi-part interview with a government insider intimately familiar with the events
that took place in Benghazi. In this part, he provides important background, and explains this
administration is engaged in a massive cover-up.

DH: It’s been a while since we’ve discussed Benghazi. What have you heard lately?

II: Before I answer that, I want to get a few things off my chest. Every politician, whether it’s a
congressman senator, diplomat, or their spokespeople and the media are lying to the American
public every time they call the location of the attack a consulate. It was not. There was absolutely no
diplomatic consulate in Benghazi. None. Words are important here. They can create a wrong image,
an incorrect picture of what was really going on. The property where our Ambassador and other
Americans were murdered was a rented villa consisting of a primary residence with a couple of
outbuildings behind the actual house. The reason they’re still calling it a consulate is to subtly divert
any questions about our activities there.

DH: Let’s go over this again; exactly what was taking place at Benghazi?

II: As I said, the place where the attack happened is one of the largest, one of the most active CIA
operation centers in North Africa, if not in the entire Middle East. It was not a diplomatic station. It
was a planning and operations center, a logistics hub for weapons and arms being funneled out of
Libya. Unlike the embassy in Tripoli, there was limited security in Benghazi. Why? So the operation
did not draw attention to what was going on there.

DH: So in reality there were no actual security issues?

II: Oh yes, there were, in Tripoli. Diplomatic cables show that. But it was for the embassy in Tripoli,
the Ambassador and the diplomatic staff in general, not specifically for the Benghazi location for two
reasons. First, the Benghazi location was a CIA operation, not a diplomatic one. Visible security at
that location would draw unwanted attention there. They had to blend in. Remember, the villa was
located in a somewhat residential area, sort of like the suburbs. Secondly, additional manpower was
not needed there, at this CIA center, as the operation was already winding down.

DH: I know you’ve gone over this before, but let’s get into the specifics of the operation at

II: Good, I want to be clear. After Gaddafi was taken out, there was the matter of his weapons and
arms that were hidden all over Libya, including chemical weapons - gas weapons. According to
Obama and Hillary Clinton, we were in Libya to collect and destroy these weapons to make for a
‘safer’ Libya. That’s what they were telling the American public. That’s not really what was going on,
though, and it seems like all of the other nations except the average American knew it. Anyway, you
can find pictures and videos of weapons caches being destroyed, but that is strictly for the public’s
What was really happening, before Gaddafi’s body was even cold, is that we had people locating
caches of weapons, separating the working from those that weren’t, and making a big show of
destroying the weapons, but only the weapons that were useless. The working weapons were being
given to Islamic terrorists. They were being funneled through Libya, crisscrossing Libya on a Muslim
Brotherhood managed strategic supply route. In fact, Michael Reagan called it the modern day
equivalent of the Ho Chi Minh Trail in a recent article he wrote, and he is correct.

The entire arms and weapons running operation was headquartered in Benghazi, The weapons
were actually being shipped out of Libya from the port city of Dernah, located about a hundred miles
east of Benghazi. That was the ‘choke point’ of the weapons being shipped out. Remember the
Lusitania? Think in those terms, ships carrying weapons hid among ‘humanitarian aid.’ By the time
of the attacks, an estimated 30-40 million pounds of arms were already transported out of Libya.

From there, the weapons were being sent to staging areas in Turkey near the Syrian border, for use
by the Free Syrian Army and other ragtag terrorist groups to fight against Assad. The objective was
and still is to destabilize the Assad government.

Why Syria, why not Iran?

II: It’s both, but Syria is the primary target here for this operation. First, look at the bigger picture,
look at the so-called “Arab Spring.” Who benefits and by default, who doesn’t? Who is the architect
for what’s going on throughout the Middle East and North Africa? Whose agenda is being
implemented? To specifically address Benghazi, though, look at the bigger picture here and what is
trying to be accomplished.

The Obama administration is playing the role of Saudi Arabia’s private army. I think if Americans
knew this, they would be outraged. Our service men and women are being sold out as mercenaries
for the wants and desires of the Royal family, for the Saudi’s interests. It’s about religious dominance
and oil. Who is really benefitting from, say, what’s going on in Egypt? Mubarek is out, and the
Muslim Brotherhood is in. Who does that benefit? Saudi Arabia.

Look at what we see happening in Egypt. Destabilization. Do you think the Russians want that? Hell
no. Syria is Russia’s red line in the sand, as you earlier wrote. If Syria is lost to the Muslim
Brotherhood by the actions of Obama, Hillary Clinton and others in this administration, what
happens? Well, it will have an adverse impact on Russia from a military standpoint. They will likely
lose access to their Mediterranean deep water port in Syria, which is Tartus.

But think further - three dimensionally. Russia is still the world’s largest oil producer, and that’s
Russia’s primary source of income. Then there’s Turkey, adjacent to Syria. A large amount of
Russian oil and gas, consumed by the West, flows through Turkey, which is also a player in this

So, the destabilization of Syria which is exactly what Obama and Clinton are trying to do, presents a
direct military and economic threat to Russia. Assad at least has kept things in check in Syria. Can
you imagine Assad being replaced by someone like Morsi? That would strike at the very heart of
Russia’s economic health and military capabilities. Think of what’s at stake here. Do Americans want
a regional war? World War III? Has Obama or Clinton asked the American people if this is what they

Make no mistake, we are doing the bidding for Saudi Arabia. The U.S., NATO and other allies are
engaged in a proxy war with Iran and Russia.
What about Assad’s war crimes?

Assad is no angel, but don’t be fooled by the death toll attributed to him. Now this is important.
Remember the first Gulf War? In the run up to Desert Storm, a young woman testified before the
Human Rights Caucus - she only testified under her first name, which was Nayirah. Remember that
she testified that Iraqi soldiers were taking infants from incubators in Kuwait, leaving them to die?
Her testimony was supposedly confirmed by Amnesty International. Her testimony went viral, and
every war hawk in the U.S. government cited her testimony, saying we needed to right the wrongs,
the inhumanity. It was all one big lie!

After Desert Storm, it was revealed that Nayirah’s last name was Al-Sabah, and she was the
daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the United States. Her testimony was part of a publicity
campaign organized by Citizens for a Free Kuwait, which was run by Hill & Knowlton, a PR firm out
of New York. People must learn the back story.

So we see a body count attributed to Assad. Who’s doing the killing, Assad’s people? Maybe at
times, but the Free Syrian Army and other groups are doing most of the slaughter. It’s one huge
‘false flag’ operation and the media is selling it hard. And Americans are buying it, just like the
testimony of the girl from Kuwait.

It’s one big lie being told by Obama, Clinton, Rice, and others. Many Americans are buying the lie,
and the media is selling the lie. The people behind this are laughing at us. Don’t you get it? They’re
laughing at us.

And do you want to know what’s at stake? Four Americans were killed in Benghazi. Forty thousand
have been killed so far in Syria. Tens of thousands of Syrian people have become refugees. Why?
For what? To advance the agenda of Saudi Arabia. For oil.

You know, the so-called right wing establishment were all up in arms about Obama’s submissive
bow to the Saudi King. Where are they now? Where’s the outrage that the body count will be much
greater than Forty thousand? It is anticipated that if the Obama plan succeeds, not only will America
be committed to yet another war, but the body count could be as high as FOUR MILLION.
Christians, among others, will be slaughtered. This could trigger a third world war, it’s that serious.

What are Russia and Iran doing? Certainly, they must be fighting back.

Benghazi was a strike against us, the Obama-Clinton agenda. A visible strike, and I’ll explain more
about this shortly, because there are events I will point out that will put it all into perspective. But
think of it this way. How did we successfully collapse the Soviet Union? I mean, what was the last
straw? We attacked their currency - the Ruble. They’re still stinging from that, and Putin was in the
KGB at the time. Do you think he forgot about that?

So, how do, or will Russia and Iran strike back if Obama and Clinton continue this insanity?
Militarily? Possibly in regional conflicts, but to take us out, to stop us, what is the one area where we
are very vulnerable? It’s our economy - our dollar. What’s our dollar tied to? Not gold or silver
anymore, and some say it’s not tied to anything. Well, that’s not quite correct. It’s tied to OIL. The
free-flow of oil.

Oil transactions everywhere in the world, including Russia and China, are made with U.S. dollars.
We buy their oil with our dollars, and they return with those same paper dollars and employ
Americans by buying our goods and services. As Michael Reagan wrote: “[t]his system is also
crucial to the security of our diplomatic and legal infrastructure, which is ultimately backed by our
military. It’s the core of our foreign policy.” He also wrote that “any attack on the free flow of oil is an
attack on the dollar. Any attack on the dollar is an attack on our ability to project power and protect
Western democracies, economies, and ideals. God have mercy on us all if that attack is successful!”

Tomorrow Part II

Copyright © Douglas Hagmann
Douglas J. Hagmann and his son, Joe Hagmann host The Hagmann & Hagmann Report, a live
Internet radio program broadcast each weeknight from 8:00-10:00 p.m. ET.

Douglas Hagmann, founder & director of the Northeast Intelligence Network, and a multi-state
licensed private investigative agency. Doug began using his investigative skills and training to fight
terrorism and increase public awareness through his website.

Doug can be reached at:

Older articles by Doug Hagmann

Obama does not want the American people to know the truth about what is going
on, Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, AQIM

Benghazi: Behind the scenes (Part II)
          - Doug Hagmann (Bio and Archives) Friday, November 30, 2012
          (44) Comments | Print friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
Author’s note: This is part two of a multi-part interview with a government insider intimately familiar
with the events that took place in Benghazi. It is important to note that the information contained in
this series was developed from interviews that spanned over 100 hours. In this part, the insider
provides information about the events of the attack and the continuation of the cover-up at the
highest levels of our government. (For Part I, please click here).

We’ve heard different accounts and different timelines concerning the attack at Benghazi.
What exactly happened?

First, people must understand that the compound that was attacked was situated in a somewhat
rural area and was not a consulate, but a rented villa, or a residential structure. The residence was
the primary building, and what has been referred to as the annex was located about 1800 feet away
as the crow flies, but just over a mile to travel by road. And again, visible security was not present as
the compound was the headquarters for a covert operation. No one wanted to draw attention to what
was taking place at this location.

The first indications of problems there began at least twelve-(12) hours before the first shot was
even fired. One of the men at the compound observed a policeman or Libyan security officer taking
photographs outside of the villa. Keep in mind that Ambassador Stevens, the point man in this
Obama-sanctioned weapons running operation, was hastily scheduled to meet with the Turkish
consul general at this location. The meeting was deliberately planned for dinner tie, toward evening,
when the events that happened next could be performed under the cover of darkness.

It’s also important to consider the location of this meeting. Tripoli is the seat of power in Libya, and a
genuine diplomatic meeting could more safely have been conducted there, at the embassy. Also,
what most people don’t know is that Libya is split, much like East and West Germany before the
wall. The eastern part is more closely aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood, the same group that
controls Egypt. The Turkish consul general had to meet there, not just with Stevens but with other
factions involved in this covert operation.

Now I’ll digress for a moment. It is reasonable to ask whether the Turkish consul general was setting
Stevens up for a hit, like a classic mob-style hit. First, there is no dispute that there was surveillance
done at 6:30 a.m. and intermittently throughout the day. Next, consider that three hours before the
first shot was fired, about 6:30 p.m. local time, some strange things were observed taking place near
the compound. Military type vehicles began closing of the streets with trucks that had 50 caliber
guns mounted on them. Checkpoints on the streets and at intersections were being quietly closed off
around the compound. Nearby residents began going inside their homes. Anyone walking in the
area got off the streets, like a scene from a movie in the Godfather series. It was obvious that the
stage was being set for a strike against the compound. This alone reveals preplanning and

It’s also noteworthy to point out that the Turkish counsel general most likely passed through one or
more of these checkpoints, or at least would have noticed that things were not right in the area. You
must remember that just as Stevens was previously CIA working under diplomatic cover, the Turkish
counsel general was his counterpart. It’s typical spy-versus-spy stuff.

Also consider this. One of the men stationed at the compound, a British national, left the compound
at about 9:20 p.m., reportedly to get more phone cards. That’s right, phone cards, like you would buy
at Walmart. Why? Because the men at the compound ran out of minutes. Just who do you think they
were talking to that day to burn through the minutes, and why do you think they needed them at that
exact time?

They were using the phones as a last and perhaps only line of communications to provide
assessments of the strange things going on earlier. They knew that something was being planned
and they were conveying that information - their observations to those who could assist them, in
Tripoli and DC.

Based on these activities, it is clear that the men at the compound suspected that they were in
trouble long before the first shot was ever fired. They were calling anyone who would listen, or who
should have listened. We knew trouble was brewing and no one responded in any meaningful way.

Could the man who left to buy more phone cards have known what was about to take place?

Well, it’s possible, but there is no indication of that.

Was the Turkish counsel general in on this, to set Stevens up?

Well, what have we heard from our government? Has anyone even bothered to interview him? What
did he say? Don’t forget, this administration decided to handle this attack as a crime and not a
terrorist attack. How long did it take for the FBI to be able to access the ‘crime scene’ after the
attack? More importantly, what was left at the ‘crime scene’ to examine by the FBI due to this delay?
Do you think the delay was accidental?

Do you know what was discussed, or the reason for the meeting between Stevens and the
Turkish consul general?
Yes, I know some key points. First, keep in mind what this arms running operation was all about. It
was to topple Assad and replace him with a Muslim Brotherhood leader. It was to destabilize Syria to
advance the agenda of Saudi Arabia. They were using U.S. and NATO forces to do exactly that.

However, Assad is no Gaddafi, and there is no comparison between Assad’s army and the Libyan
army. It would take much more than rebels inside Syria to topple Assad. There is no way on earth
that the Syrian rebels, or Free Syrian Army, has the capability to accomplish this objective alone. It
required U.S. assistance, arms and training.

Now, Turkey is a NATO ally. They were assisting the Obama-Clinton-Saudi plan to funnel weapons
ultimately to Syria, but the primary staging areas for these weapons were in Turkey near the Syrian
border. Visual surveillance by Russia, using satellites and other means amassed photographic
documentation of the U.S. assisting the ‘anti-Assad rebels’ inside Turkey. They developed evidence
of the U.S. training these rebels and assisting them into Syria to fight against Assad.

Think about this. What if surveillance images observed anti-Assad rebels being trained to handle
and mount chemical weapons - gas shells - onto rockets? The process would be apparent and
would obviously be detected by a number of visual indicators. Obviously, Syria wanted this to stop.
By extension, so did Russia.

One aspect of the weapons plan was to set up a false flag operation to make it appear that Assad
used chemical weapons against his own people. Imagine the outcry from the civilized world to the
news that Assad ‘gassed’ his own people. That would be an invitation to NATO and the West to
openly intervene. Don’t forget about the timing of all of this. Two months before the elections, and
time was running out. The job of taking out Assad was not yet complete. Such an event would
quickly advance this agenda. By this time, however, being caught and placed in a rather unenviable
position between Russia and the U.S., the Turkish consul general was in a ‘CYA, clean-up’ mode,
assuring that none of the chemical weapons that might have still been in Libya were headed for

It is also important to understand that the covert weapons running operation was just about finished.
An estimated 40 million pounds of weapons were already shipped from Libya, and things were
winding down.

There was another issue as well, a very important and telling one. Seven members of the
Iranian Red Crescent had been kidnapped or snatched from the streets of Benghazi on or about July
31, 2012. Again you must understand that virtually anyone walking on the streets of Benghazi not
indigenous to the area are spies. Covert operatives, operating under various covers. From all

Along with the message that the weapons running operation was compromised, the Iranians had
good reason to suspect that the ‘Red Crescent workers’ were snatched by the CIA or with their
assistance. Iran wanted them back. They were spies, and countries want their spies back! So part of
the meeting was to address this, as there was pressure by Russia against a wavering Turkey to
switch sides. Anyway, you’ll see how this ties in to the way the actual attack was executed.

Please continue.

So at 9:30 pm local time, the compound began to take on small arms fire. Based on all reports I’ve
reviewed, there were three twelve-man attack teams armed with small arms, RPGs, and other
sophisticated military style weapons. These were not run-of-the-mill street weapons, but military
issued type weapons. The types of weapons alone scream that this was a preplanned attack.
Eyes on the area [author’s note: satellites, surveillance drones] confirmed that two of these teams
surrounded the villa and the annex. The third team was elsewhere, lying in wait. The two teams
began their assault on the compound where Stevens was inside about an hour after the Turkish
counsel general left. Remember, he had to pass the checkpoints after the meeting. Just keep that in

Anyway, we all know now that there was an intense firefight that lasted nearly nine hours during
which four Americans, Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Dougherty and Tyrone Woods
were killed. And of course that attack was not over a video and there were no protests before the

Now there are questions that are not being asked. The two well-armed ‘hit teams’ had the capability
to reduce the compound and annex to rubble quickly. Why a protracted firefight? There are a couple
of reasons.

First, what was the makeup of the ‘hit teams,’ or who were the attackers? We have verified that the
attackers were a combination of members of Ansar al Sharia and Al-Qaeda in the Islamic
Maghreb (AQIM), but they were operating under the flag of Ansar al Sharia. Who is Ansar al
Sharia? Iranian terrorists. They are a terrorist group that receives their training by and funding from
Iran. Now think about this. Carefully consider the implications here. IRAN. It’s the elephant in the
room no one wants to mention or talk about.

The attack on our ambassador and our people - Americans - was an attack by Iran. It was an attack
at a nation-state level.

AQIM also assisted. They are indigenous to Africa and are extremely dangerous. AQIM is a very
‘elite’ and extremely well-funded group, and very limited in number. Our last assessment suggests
that there are only 400 or so members, but they are very influential across Africa and into South and
Central America and Western Europe. Their importance and relevance will become evident shortly.

The reason that they did not just take out the compound and everything and everyone in it is that
they were looking for their spies. Remember the Red Crescent workers? The Iranian spies? They
suspected that they might be held at the annex. As such, they wanted to free them and did not want
to risk killing them.

Oh, and there were others ‘missing’ as well. AQIM members. These were terrorists involved in drug
running operations from the Tri-border (TBA) areas of South America through North Africa and into
Western Europe. By the way, this is the way they made their money. Drugs sell at higher profits in
Western Europe than elsewhere, so there is money to be made. The problem is that some of them
got caught—snatched up in Benghazi and northeastern Libya.

Now regarding AQIM, this has a direct connection not only to South America, but also to Mexico and
Mexican drug gangs. You think that what’s going on in Libya is just ‘over there,’ and far away from
the U.S. and has nothing to do with our safety and security? Think again, but more on this in a bit.

There’s also another reason. The hit teams fully expected rescue teams from the U.S. to be
dispatched to the compound. Certainly, calls for help went out. By waiting for the back-up or rescue
forces, a surprise assault by the other ‘hit team’ team would have exposed our forces to possible
causalities and turned the event into a much bigger event where the actual nature of the operation
could be exposed to the world. Instead of being a cover-up for which they have yet to be held
accountable, it would have been an international incident that would have exposed the entire affair.
So the Ansar al Sharia attack groups deliberately conducted a protracted assault on the compound.
Just imagine, our men and even the bad guys never expected team Obama would leave our people
twisting in the wind, fighting for their lives. That alone should speak volumes to every American.

As daylight approached, they had to wrap things up so they could disappear under the cover of
darkness. Oh, and the crowds that are often cited by this administration, did form in the area as the
attack progressed, much like a growing mob in riot. They provided the fog, or the cover, that
permitted the attackers to escape amid the crowd.

You mentioned the missing Iranian Red Crescent workers and members of AQIM. Were they
ever released or found?

Yes, and this is an extremely important part of this entire story. This reaches into the highest levels
of our government. This is so very important that it must be addressed separately.

So the attack was first and the crowd came later. I noted that the administration said that
there were protests going on at the Embassy in Cairo at the same time and they compared it
to Benghazi.

Yes, that’s their cover story and they know that there is absolutely no comparison. This is one huge
lie that is easily addressed and put out of its misery.

How soon did U.S. intelligence officials know who was responsible for the attack?

Almost immediately, if not concurrent with the attack. Every part of that area is under active aerial
surveillance by the U.S. There was SIGINT or communication intercepts at the time of the attack.
Then, there was even an admission by the attackers. Obama knew. Hillary knew. Clapper knew.
Everyone knew, expect the American people. And you know what? The American media knew as

I heard a statement that they did not admit knowledge to avoid alerting the perpetrators.

Yes, it was said that Rice and others did not want to alert the ‘bad guys’ or tip their hand or some
such nonsense, but did that mean that Susan Rice, for example, had to appear on national television
and lie to every one of us, to the country? In my opinion, Rice took on the temporary job of
propaganda minister for a day in exchange for a shot at Secretary of State in the future.

You are painting quite a dire picture.

It gets worse, much worse, and it involves real threats across the globe and even to us here in the
United States. But it’s all because of our actions, the covert weapons running from Libya to Syria by
way of Turkey at the direction of Barack Obama and his Saudi ‘handlers.’

FORTY THOUSAND men, women and children are dead in Syria as a direct result of this attempt at
nation building, or tearing down Assad. There are four dead Americans. We are arming some of the
very people who are killing our troops. Not only are we on the wrong side of this, we are actively
pushing the world to the precipice of World War III.

We are engaged in a real war here with Iran and Syria and by extension, with Russia and China.
And we are being lied to about it every step of the way. And the lies are getting worse, but so are the
attempts to stop the truth from getting out.
What do you mean?

What do you think the recent directive issued by Obama, the one you wrote about ‘insider threats,’ is
all about? Obama does not want the American people to know the truth about what is going on. He’s
doubled down to stop leaks, like this. But you know what? He just might be too late, because we’re
not done here. I’m not done talking, and there’s much more that needs to be exposed.

Copyright © Douglas Hagmann
Douglas J. Hagmann and his son, Joe Hagmann host The Hagmann & Hagmann Report, a live
Internet radio program broadcast each weeknight from 8:00-10:00 p.m. ET.

Douglas Hagmann, founder & director of the Northeast Intelligence Network, and a multi-state
licensed private investigative agency. Doug began using his investigative skills and training to fight
terrorism and increase public awareness through his website.

Doug can be reached at:

Older articles by Doug Hagmann

Advancing the agenda of Saudi Arabia, the Muslim Brotherhood in North Africa,
Middle East. We're doing their work, pitting ourselves against Syria, Iran and
ultimately Russia and China

Benghazi explained: Interview with
an “Intelligence Insider” (Part III)
          - Doug Hagmann (Bio and Archives) Wednesday, December 12, 2012
          (28) Comments | Print friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

Author’s note: This is part three of a multi-part interview with a
government insider intimately familiar with the events that took
place in Benghazi. As previously stated, the information contained
in this series was developed from interviews that spanned over
100 hours. Included in this update is the most current information
following a more recent interview with this insider. (Click here for
Part I and Part II).

Events seem to be changing rapidly in Syria, and we know
that the operations in Benghazi played a very important role
in Syria. Please update the readers on the current situation, but first give a brief recap for

Okay, but we’re running out of time. The world is running out of time. Remember when we first
began this lengthy interview process? It was in response to your report on September 15, 2012, just
four days after the attack in Libya. You wrote that the fuse for WW III has been lit. It is now burning
rapidly down, although people are still not understanding what’s taking place right in front of them.

I’ll give a brief, perhaps somewhat oversimplified recap going back to the beginning, giving context
for what’s taking place at this very moment. I suppose I cannot overstate this or say this enough.
The so-called “Arab Spring” is an initiative by Obama and his foreign policy advisers, Clinton, in her
capacity of Secretary of State, and others including some of the most powerful people in the world.
International bankers, the power brokers and string pullers. It is a plan to reshape the Middle East
and North Africa, and change the geopolitical balance of power. It’s not about some feel-good
mission to free the oppressed. Never was. It’s about the U.S., through the CIA, using groups
ideologically aligned to al Qaeda aligned to overthrow various Middle East nations to install regimes
controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood

It’s a globalist agenda, using the blueprints and agenda created by Saudi Arabia for the North
African and Middle East portions of the globe, to shape that area geopolitically. They are using the
United States as their surrogate and their military muscle, and the Obama led U.S. “regime” is all too
willing to comply.

With regard to Libya, it was in March of 2011 when the Clinton State Department, under orders of
Obama, appointed Ambassador Stevens as the point man to the al Qaeda linked Libyan opposition
forces to topple Qaddafi. Remember, Osama bin Laden was reportedly killed two months later and al
Qaeda was supposedly out of existence, according to Obama. But think about this. Under direct
orders of Obama, Clinton appointed Stevens to work with the very same people who reportedly killed
3000-plus Americans on September 11, 2001 for the purposes of overthrowing Qaddafi. It worked,
and Qaddafi was deposed and murdered in October of 2011.

Look at what happened next. Clinton announced that the U.S. was throwing $40 million into Libya to
“secure” Qaddafi’s weapon arsenals. Oh, really? That’s what was being told to the public and to
congress, but it’s not reality, certainly not from the inside. As I’ve already explained, that money and
our personnel were being used to collect the weapons to send them to Syria to topple Assad. Before
getting to Syria, they were placed in staging areas in Turkey near the Syrian border, and other
places, including Jordan. They were being collected and sent through northern Libya, and the CIA
operations center was the headquarters for this operation. As I’ve said many times, there was no
embassy or consulate in Benghazi. It was a covert CIA operations center.

Wait, why do people continue to call it a consulate? Why is it identified on Google maps as a

First, it continues to be called a consulate because this is part of the cover-up. The government is
STILL lying to the American people. The media is assisting in the cover-up, and so are some in
congress in both parties. For goodness sakes, anyone looking at Google maps on September 10,
2012 will never find the Benghazi location named a consulate. It’s a LIE!

Sorry, please go on.

So every American understands, it is OUR tax money in part that was used to arm Islamic groups
ideologically aligned with al Qaeda. Imagine that. Eleven years after 9/11, we’re funding and
assisting the very same terrorists who attacked our country to topple another country. And other
countries are in this up to their necks as well. The Brits for one. The very country or empire that
created some of the post-war borders, many knowingly unmanageable from the outset, is now in
part responsible for changing them.

Anyway, the weapons everyone in government said that were “collected” and destroyed were pieces
of junk that never worked. The working weapons, including an estimated 10-15,000 shoulder fired
missiles were shipped out of Libya. Stevens was the head of logistics, coordinating this operation.
He was working with the Turkish consul general as well, the guy who met with him on the night of his
death. We already went over this in detail.

The attack was perpetuated by Ansar al-Shariah, an Islamic terrorist group backed by Iran. Also
present were members of the terror group AQIM, or al Qaeda in Northern Africa. It was a
coordinated attack for a purpose, and never, ever had anythig remotely to do with any internet video.

Please touch on the nature of the attack again for those just catching up

As I explained before, I have information that three “hit teams” were dispatched to Benghazi[iii].
Stevens was lured to the CIA compound to talk about Russia’s knowledge of what the U.S. was
doing - running weapons to be used against Assad in Syria, which is Russia’s “red line.” They
needed to talk and not at the embassy, but at this out of the way location. The weapons running
operation, although it was winding down anyway, was compromised. Over. Done. It is likely that the
Turkish consul general told Sevens that the Russians had evidence - proof, of weapons in Turkey,
including chemical weapons. Turkey, a NATO ally being squeezed by Russia, wanted the weapons
gone from their turf. We also had people up there training the “rebels” on how to use the weapons as
well. You heard about training exercises in that area on or about September 11, 2012? Who do you
think we were training? Right after the Turkish counsel general left, the attack against the CIA
compound began.

What was the reason for the attack?

Remember the story of the Iranian Red Crescent workers being “snatched” from the streets of
Benghazi late on July 31 or the early morning of August 1, 2012? This happened at the same time
the CIA compound wall was hit by a mortar. These Red Crescent workers were spies. At the same
time, some members of the terror group AQIM were also picked up in Benghazi. It was a mystery!
Where did they go? Who had them?

The belief was that they were being held at the CIA compound. Iran wanted them back. So, in
addition to everything else, Ansar al Shariah was looking for their people. AQIM were looking for
their people too. This is the reason the compound was not immediately leveled by the weapons they
had on sight. They were trying to find and free their people, who were not being held there, but
elsewhere. They were trying to ‘smoke” the people out of the compound and rescue the “hostages.”

Plus, a message had to be sent to Obama, Clinton and others that the weapons operation had to
stop. The groups leading the attack, primarily Ansar al Sharia with an AQIM presence as well, were
tools of Iran, Syria and of course, Russia.

So there were two reasons for the attack: get their spies back, and expose this operation for what it
was. Again, we went over this.

The snatched Red Crescent Workers play prominently into exposing this operation.
Yes, and here is where it gets interesting. They were released exactly 65 days after they were
snatched. They were in good health and dropped off on the streets of Tripoli. But why then? This is
where it get’s damning to Obama, Clinton, and Valerie Jarrett.

What is not widely known to Americans is that Obama sent Iranian born Valerie Jarrett to Qatar for
high level talks with the Iranians about coming to an agreement before the November elections.
This, despite Jarrett not having the capacity as official of the U.S. government. She had no business
doing what she was doing. That aside, the plan was that Jarrett would broker a deal, and Obama
would announce to the world that he had succeeded in diplomatic negotiations with the Iranians
where they would halt their nuclear weapons ambitions and Obama would officially live up to his title
as savior of the world.

But before the talks kicked into high gear, the Iranians told Jarrett that the Red Crescent workers
had to be released before any talks could be done in earnest. Jarrett relayed that to Obama and
Clinton, and then, out of nowhere, the missing workers were suddenly released.

If there were talks and the “spies” were released, then why was there no agreement?

Because Jarrett, Obama and Clinton were being played by the Iranians. It was to buy time,
especially since the Obama agenda of arming the anti-Assad rebels was continuing. The Iranians
are not stupid. They understood that Obama and Clinton were continuing to support the anti-Assad
rebels, and with bipartisan support, STILL ARE!

So now we are hearing reports of chemical weapons planned for use by Assad. What’s the
real story?

The world is being set up for a false flag operation. Obama, Clinton and every supporter of the anti-
Assad initiative are either lying to the American people or are “dupes.” The objective remains taking
out Assad and replacing him with a Muslim Brotherhood-backed regime.

There have been reports out of the U.S. and the UK that Assad is preparing to use chemical
weapons against the rebels. Assad denies that he would ever use them, and there is a reason we
should believe him in this case. The condemnation that would result is unnecessary and certainly
unwarranted. There reports are to condition people to immediately suspect Assad when a chemical
incident occurs. In this case, it’s the U.S., the UK and other Western backed countries constantly
asserting that Assad will launch a chemical attack, and we’re getting ready just for that case.

But if you look at the evidence, it’s the anti-Assad, Western backed forces that have taken
possession of chemical storage areas. There was a recently released video, very graphic in nature
of anti-Assad rebels conducting the test of a nerve agent on two rabbits. The video displayed
chemicals bottles with the name of a Turkish country on them. I’m not going to give the name or
video channel, but people can find the video for themselves on YouTube. It’s a set-up to topple
Assad and put a Muslim brotherhood leader in his place.

I told you before, and you printed what I said, that a chemical weapon attack would justify U.S. and
NATO intervention, supported by the outcry of the world against Assad. It’s Iraq all over again,
except Syria is a hundred times more dangerous. Unlike Iraq, Afghanistan or even Libya, Syria will
not implode. It will EXPLODE, and we will be fighting Iranians as well. Russia has “advisers” in Syria
as well. Are the American people ready and willing to square off against Iran AND Russia in a
regional conflict that will likely turn into a global, full scale war?

What’s going on with Turkey, Syria and Russia now?
It was announced that Turkey will receive patriot Missiles to protect them from the spillover. Actually,
these missiles over the northern territory of Syria will create a de-facto no fly zone that will allow the
consolidation of anti-Assad rebels to perhaps install a new Western-backed government in the
northern part of Syria[vii].

Well, Russia deployed Iskander missiles into Syria, rendering the Patriot missiles ineffective. This
move shows exactly how serious Russia is. They are not backing down.

And you know what else? Sunburn missiles are at Iran’s disposal and can be used in that theater.
Regardless of what is written or talked about by talking heads, these missiles poses a grave threat to
our aircraft carriers. Want to see how fast we can lose an aircraft carrier and the several thousand
crew members on board? This is what we face.

Russia is doubling down, Iran is doubling down. Assad is doubling down. Meanwhile, Obama and
the U.S. State Department continue to lie to the American people. The lie continues, and the fuse to
WW III is burning down while the Obama regime is heading full steam ahead toward regional and
global war.

Why haven’t we heard any truth about Benghazi, even from congressional investigators?

Because the lie continues, and we are still supporting the overthrow of Assad, despite Putin’s
warnings. Obama, Clinton, the global leaders and their financiers are continuing to lead us into
World War III. The lies continue, and to continue operations, the truth must be kept from the
American public. We are continuing our operations to overthrow Assad at full throttle right in front of
all Americans. And there will be fallout.

In addition to four dead Americans and over 40 thousand dead Syrians, the consequences of our
actions will cause the death of an estimated FOUR MILLION in Syria alone, many Christians. When,
not if the “conflict” escalates, we’ll see many millions dead. And for what?

Okay, what’s the objective here?

Behind the smoke and mirrors is the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. It’s their agenda. We’re just providing
the army, the training, performing the logistics and doing the heavy lifting. It’s the Saudi agenda, and
it’s about power, control and oil. Who do you think controls the Muslim brotherhood? Has anyone
asked why Obama, raised in a Muslim culture, is tied at the hip with the Muslim Brotherhood?

Why aren’t Americans angry that we are using our assets, our men and women to advance the
agenda of Saudi Arabia under the orders of Barack Hussein Obama?

Why are members of congress so quick to commit our forces to oust Assad when it benefits Saudi
Arabia, not the U.S?

The agenda of Obama is so overt, so “in your face” yet not one member of congress, not one media
outlet is calling him out on this. Some might call this mere conspiracy theory. There’s a conspiracy
alright, but it involves the government and the media. They are laughing in our faces.

In addition to the obvious regional consequences, there will be blowback from the Obama-Clinton

What type of blowback?
Well, let’s first look at what’s happened already as this insane Obama agenda has been going on for
some time. Remember the plot to kill the Saudi ambassador to the U.S? On October 11, 2011, the
FBI announced that a plot, identified by the FBI as “Operation Red Coalition,” was foiled to kill Saudi
ambassador Adel al-Jubeir in the United States. It was alleged that Iranian nationals were working
with a Mexican drug gang to kill al-Jubeir with a bomb while he was dining at a DC restaurant. Do
you think he would have been the only one to die there if that plan succeeded? No, innocent men,
women and children would have died as well.

Many in the media and the talking heads were having trouble understanding why Iran or Iranian
nationals would want the Saudi Ambassador dead. Well, in the context of what you know now, does
this make a bit more sense? These events do not happen in a vacuum.

But I’m sure people will question why members of a Mexican drug cartel would be enlisted to assist
in this operation? This gets a bit complex, but it goes back to AQIM. Remember them? That’s al
Qaeda in Northern Africa. They are an elite Muslim terror group of perhaps 400 or so members.
They carefully screen their members, and do a lot of subcontracting. Despite being Muslim, they are
running drugs from South America, specifically the Tri-Border Area (TBA) into North Africa for
ultimate distribution into Europe. Why Europe instead of North America? Because the drugs are
worth more there, and the profit difference is worth it.

While drugs are being funneled from South America, terror groups are also funneling al Qaeda
terrorists or terrorists of similar ideology into South America and into Mexico, where they are
entering the United States. Think of it as a two-lane highway. Some of these terrorists have been
caught at the southern border of the U.S., some with tattoos on their arms of mullahs and Islamic
phrases of jihad. Why? Because when the Syria-Iran situation goes hot, there will be terrorists
already inside the United States. But we created them and gave them the reason to be here. A few
AQIM members, running the drugs east, were caught in Benghazi, which explains their presence
and getting picked up there as well.

So Ansar al Shariah and AQIM, both present at Benghazi, were looking for their people.

But back to the blowback, or the consequences of the Obama foreign policy agenda. There is more,
and it much more serious.

Attacks in the U.S?

For all intents and purposes, the United States, Russia and China are at war. Although the situation
in Syria is being described as a civil war, it is the direct result of U.S. involvement by Obama and
Clinton at the behest of Saudi Arabia. While real bullets are flying in Syria, an asymmetrical war
exists beyond the confines of Syria’s borders.

Remember, Putin has drawn a hard line in the sand at Syria. The stability of Syria is of extreme
strategic economic and military importance to Russia as well as China. Although no hot war exists
between Russia, China and the U.S. at the moment, that does not mean things are not taking place
behind the scenes in ways that are not readily apparent.

One of the biggest threats to the United States right now is an attack on the U.S. Dollar. At this
moment, the fate of the U.S. dollar hangs in the balance. What is the U.S. dollar backed by? Gold?
Silver? Neither. Some say the dollar is not backed by anything, and although they might be
technically accurate, it’s not entirely true. At this moment, the dollar is backed by one important
thing, which is oil. The stability of the dollar rests on the free and unimpeded flow of oil. Once that is
interrupted or even threatened, there is a high degree of risk that the dollar will collapse.
The “string pullers” are pulling us into a situation where our actions result in the disruption or the
threat of disruption of the free flow of oil. Given the current state of our economy, how fast might this
bring down the United States without a shot having to be fired?

Now I know I’m stepping out into some areas that people might consider to be fringe, but think about
what is taking place in the U.S. and across the globe. People talk about global governance, or a one
order under a single currency. What’s the quickest way to destroy a country from within? What was
the major reason for the collapse of the Soviet Union? Remember the Ruble? I can tell you this,
Putin does.

So at this point, what’s an expeditious way to strike at the very heart of America while also
accomplishing other larger global objectives? Take out the U.S. dollar.

We are in a period of heightened risk and maximum vulnerability, put here by Obama, his foreign
policy advisers, czars, and of course Hillary Clinton. What are their objectives, and those of his
closest advisers, especially in terms of the fate of the U.S? Fundamental change in ways that can be
hardly imagined.

Are you saying that the larger objective is to destroy America?

I’m saying that we are advancing the agenda of Saudi Arabia and the Muslim Brotherhood in North
Africa and the Middle East. We’re doing their work, pitting ourselves against Syria, Iran and
ultimately Russia and China. Syria and Iran are firewalls for Russia and China. Russia and China
understand the monster created and used by the United States, they understand the Muslim
Brotherhood backed terrorists. They will not stop at Syria. They will continue to push into the
Federation of Russian States, disrupt oil flow, overthrow nations and threaten the security and
sovereignty of Russia and threaten China. We’re playing with fire, and to expect no consequences is

The path that Obama continues to take, without any objection from congress or others in the U.S.,
will lead us on a path to self destruction. Perhaps the ultimate question is whether it is by
incompetence or by design.

Copyright © Douglas Hagmann
Douglas J. Hagmann and his son, Joe Hagmann host The Hagmann & Hagmann Report, a live
Internet radio program broadcast each weeknight from 8:00-10:00 p.m. ET.

Douglas Hagmann, founder & director of the Northeast Intelligence Network, and a multi-state
licensed private investigative agency. Doug began using his investigative skills and training to fight
terrorism and increase public awareness through his website.

Doug can be reached at:

Older articles by Doug Hagmann
Chaffetz: State Dept Hiding Benghazi Survivors

by Kerry Picket12 Dec 2012667post a comment

Congressman Jason Chaffetz (R- UT) told Breitbart News on
Wednesday that he has been “thwarted” by the State Department
from seeing any Americans who survived the deadly attack on the
U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi. Many people forget that
there were Americans who survived the Benghazi attack, some of
whom were badly injured and are still recovering.
“My understanding is that we still have some people in the hospital. I’d like to visit with
them and wish them nothing but the best but the State Department has seen it unfit for
me to know who those people are—or even how many there are,” Rep. Chaffetz said. "I
don’t know who they are. I don’t know where they live. I don’t know what state they’re
from. I don’t even know how many there are. It doesn’t seem right to me."
“This is so patently different than any other experience I’ve had. Unfortunately, people
have been killed and maimed and in harm’s way in Afghanistan and Iraq and in points
beyond. It’s typically been the case that they would release those names but in this case,
they won’t. My challenge is to the media. You try and figure it out. They won’t let
Congress know. They won’t seem to let the media know either.”
Breitbart News sent an inquiry to the State Department regarding those who survived
the attack in Benghazi and is awaiting a response.

A Timeline of the Benghazi Attacks

John Hudson 3,372 ViewsSep 21, 2012

While the deadly attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi has dominated headlines for more
than a week, the facts of what actually happened during the Sept. 11 assault are still far from
settled. A myriad of questions remain such as the identity of the attackers, the degree to which
the assault was pre-planned and why security at the consulate was so insufficient, but new
accounts bring us closer to how events unfolded that night and how U.S. Ambassador Chris
Stevens and three other U.S. personnel were killed. To help sort it all out, this is a timeline of
what we know so far about the attack, sequenced in Benghazi time.

                                                 8:00 to 9:30 p.m. This is the most disputed period
of the evening. At 8 p.m., Ambassador Stevens finished a meeting with the Turkish consul
general and, according to The Wall Street Journal, said he was "retiring for the night." What
happened next has still not been established. Obama administration officials say that around 8
p.m.. a mob of Muslim protesters gathered around the U.S. consulate to protest the U.S. film
Innocence of Muslims. Yesterday, however, CBS News reported that witnesses at the scene say
there was never an anti-American protest outside the consulate. "That is in direct contradiction to
the administration's account of the incident," said CBS correspondent Margaret Brennan. In
today's paper, The New York Times also reported that witnesses say no anti-American protests
occurred at the consulate: "Libyan witnesses, including two guards at the building, say the area
around the compound was quiet until the attackers arrived." The map on the right shows a
Google satellite image of the consulate.
9:30 p.m. The attackers arrive, approaching the consulate from three sides, armed with rocket-
propelled grenades. According to The Journal, the militants breached the front and east walls
around the building, and Americans began firing from inside. The Times says 20 Americans are
inside at this time. The building was not heavily guarded and at no point were Marines involved
in the fighting, despite initial reports.
                                                 9:35 to 10:30 p.m. The consulate alarm goes off
and Libyan guards call for backup as militants gain access to the compound. "They fire rocket-
propelled grenades into the main building. Mr. Stevens, [computer technician] Sean Smith and
an American security officer are inside," reports The Times. "The security officer makes it
outside. He returns to rescue the others and finds Mr. Smith dead but does not find Mr. Stevens."
At 10 p.m., the consulate is burning in flames and, according to the Journal, the security officer
was joined by Libyan government reinforcements who just arrived. "They guard front and rear
gates as militants begin to crowd at rear gate. U.S. and Libyan guards enter burning building."
The guards were also unable to find Ambassador Stevens.
10:45 p.m. At this point, American security personnel try to take back the main building of the
consulate but fail. According to The Times they retreat to another compound about a half-mile
away traveling in "two cars" according to The Journal.
12:30 a.m. Looters descend on the consulate and pull the ambassador out of the building.
According to The Times, these same Libyans were responsible for bringing Stevens to the
hospital. Video footage of Stevens being dragged out of the compound later surfaced online
(most notably, the Drudge Report), with images of Libyans cheering and praising Allah.

                                               1:00 a.m. A half hour later, Stevens arrives at
Benghazi Medical Center and is described as "unresponsive," according to the Journal. The
Times says "The doctor who treats him says he may have died from smoke inhalation. Americans
are unaware of his whereabouts at this point." The map to the right shows the route from the
consulate to the Benghazi Medical Center (5.1 kilometers by car.)
1:30 a.m. Enter the reinforcements: "An American rescue team arrives from Tripoli at
Benghazi’s airport and drives to the second compound," reports the Times.
2 a.m. This is where phase two of the attack is reported to have begun and where evidence
emerges, according to some observers, that the attack was pre-planned and coordinated. "As the
staff is preparing to leave the second compound, it comes under fire. More than 20 staff members
retreat to a building at the back of the compound," reports the Times. Tyrone Woods and Glen
Doherty, both American security officers, were killed in the shootout. Describing the
confrontation, the Times says "The attackers had lain in wait, silently observing as the rescuers,
including eight State Department civilians who had just landed at the airport in Benghazi, arrived
in large convoys. This second attack was shorter in duration than the first, but more complex and
sophisticated. It was an ambush."

                                              3 to 4 a.m. Ambassador Stevens' body is found at
the Benghazi hospital by Libyan security forces. After his colleague's describe his features,
Libyans identify the body.
6:30 a.m. Time to leave. The U.S. survivors are flown to Tripoli. Shortly afterwards, the bodies
of the murdered Americans are flown out of Benghazi as well.

Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments or send an email to the author at You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.
John Hudson

Topics: Afghanistan, Libya
Obama – The Butcher of Benghazi.”
by Ulsterman on September 20, 2012 with 102 Comments in News

“But they are so spooked and confused over the polling data, they released it sooner. That means the
Middle East situation has them afraid. People are actually asking some questions now. Sniffing around the
situation just a bit. And if they get somebody in the military…somebody like that…to go on the record
with this…with whatever had that ambassador acting so strangely right before he was killed…well-well-
well…” -WHI

NOTE: Readers should know – Insider has been extremely busy of late, and to be given even just a bit of
time to sit down face to face again after months of being unable to do so is both unexpected and a welcome
privilege. -UM
UM: You said I get two main topics to discuss, so let’s start with Fast and Furious. Holder.
Where are we at and where will it go? Gone in the fall. That’s what you promised. Many times.

WHI: Yes I did – and I also said…was it last time we talked…also said it’s out of our hands
now. They got what they need to push him out…they can do it if they’re willin’ to get just a little
bloody. Don’t know if they will though. Some of them…some of the Republicans are willin’ –
that I know. But they ain’t leadership. They can move a committee vote on somethin’…but they
can’t bring it to the floor all by themselves. And then you got the Senate blocking
everything…not the Senate. Reid. What they got or what they promised that old motherf-
cker…nothing gettin’ by him.

Read more in News
« Obama Flip-Flops On Middle East Embassy Attacks – Now Admits It WAS A Terrorist Attack
Against America
 GUNNERGATE: Obama White House IGNORED Inspector General Gunrunning Investigation

UM: So it’s Boehner? He’s blocking taking this to the next level?

WHI: Sure…among others. I don’t want put all the blame on Boehner…he’s seeing how even if
the House were to put something strong…hell…they already done good on some of that, right?
Even pushing a legal challenge. But that takes a lot of time…and none of that will ever see the
light of day until after the election. Might make for a brutal second term for Obama if he
wins…but as for real justice? The truth? They are runnin’ out the clock. And yeah – Republicans
are dragging their feet too. Scared of a fight. A real fight.


Thing that’s got me…well…more than a little pissed off about this is the real potential behind
the DOJ investigation. You see, Fast and Furious…the gunrunning bullsh*t. It ties into a whole
pile of no good around Obama and Jarrett…there’s political stuff there of course. Gun control
and all that. None of that has really come out like it should. I promised that memo…said there
was a memo on the gun control thing, remember that? Nobody said nothing about it – and then it
came out. And I thought “here we go – now it starts”. Then nothin’. Media buried it. Deep.
Congress hardly touched it.

UM: You’re talking about the memo stating how the border violence can be used to implement
stronger gun regulations?
WHI: That’s the one – tied directly to Fast and Furious – laid out the real intent of all that
gunrunning. They wanted things to get f-cked up. They wanted those drug lords killing off each
other and if some poor innocent bastards get blown away in the crossfire, all the better, right?
Make Americans…make enough of them, hate the idea of guns. Make them willing to give some
of those guns back. Make them…the Dems would need just another 10% or so of the voters,
maybe not even that much…and gun rights in America would be transformed forever. Be lucky
to get a water gun out there after they done with it. And I ain’t talking exaggerations here. The
Democrats – ones who control the party now…taking guns away is right at the top of their
priorities list. Way up there.

UM: Why is that?

WHI: It all comes back to control with these people. Soviet Union style control. Where you live.
What you eat. What you read. How you work. They want to control all of that. ‘Course they go
on living however they like. Government becomes the elite class. And we ain’t far off from that
already. Obama, Jarrett…they want that so bad…they want to control the rest of us
because…well we are all just too damn dumb to take care of ourselves, right? It’s all for our
good, right?

UM: Back to Holder. Is he gone or does he stay?

WHI: Out of our hands. Republicans have been given what they need. They just gotta get in the
ring now and start swinging away. Hit something for f-ck’s sake. HARD.

UM: How about some of your Democrats help them to do that?
WHI: I don’t have any of “my Democrats”. They are all dead and gone or sittin’ back home
wondering…same as I wonder…how in the hell it got so bad so fast.


Democratic Party is dead. Gone. We hung ourselves in 2008. Obama was the rope. Snapped our
necks and gave us that sh-t for brains grin while he done it.

UM: You helped with that rope in 2008.

WHI: F-ck you – we all did. You don’t…no need to remind me what I done.

…And if there was a Republican Party with just a little more balls…this thing woulda been
wrapped up by now. Holder been gone and gone a long time ago. And back to Chicago with it.
They got that – they know the deal there. Investigate that DOJ – investigate those wire taps.
Investigate that prosecutor. The guys dyin’. Thing I told you about Vegas…how long ago?
Here’s the deal – it’s all f-cking there. One by one by one…it’s a hell of a mess but if they had
the nuts to go after it…they could get it done. Media would have to take it on.


But I’m just an old has-been see? When bodies start showing up…courage leaves the room real
fast. Nobody wants to risk anything on principle. Doin’ the right thing is doin’ the dead thing –
that’s what back to Chicago is in all of this. Fast and Furious…as bad as that is…that thing was
just to get the ball rolling. Get Holder gone, peel away the DOJ onion…and see the real ugly

UM: So if Holder were to go…all of the rest – all that Back to Chicago scenario you have always
been speaking to…it finally comes out?
WHI: Used to think that…there would be a good month or so of chaos at DOJ…a window where
people would be given the chance…and maybe find just enough courage to walk upright for
once. You know? Man-the-f-ck UP. This thing got dragged out so long though…and Jarrett put
West in there…he’s hangin’ real close to Holder now…sh-t, they probably got a real solid
contingency in place by now. This thing took too f-cking long to get on.


Don’t wanna think on that anymore – see what the Republicans do with it this week.

F-ck ‘em. All of ‘em. Democrats. Republicans. It’s all bullsh-t. Circle-jerkin’ mother-f-ckers.
Not a real man in the bunch these days. John f*cking Wayne has left the building man – and he
slammed the door behind him.


Ah…godd-amit, I apologize son…said I wasn’t gonna…know you don’t like all the cursin’.
Been a rough one. Past week. Got me feelin’ so damn OLD.

UM: How about the Middle East stuff? The embassy attacks? I have been trying to get out as
much information on that as possible. Is that going to hurt Obama like it should?

WHI: It will – it IS hurting him. Not as much as it should – media is in 24/7 protect mode. That
whole things stinks…not just the president’s reaction to it. Not just the lying by the
administration…but the fella who was killed…that ambassador. Now this is me – this is just me
thinkin’ here. What my gut is tellin’ me on this…that guy was no ambassador. Officially yeah –
but off the books. He was CIA. Had to have been. You made a comment in one of your
stories…’bout how it was like Fast and Furious except in the Middle East. Somethin’ like that.

UM: That if Obama was willing to arm Mexican drug lords, why not Muslim extremists.

WHI: Right – somethin’ like that. Think you might a nailed it there without knowing it. You
meant it as…like a bit of sarcasm there at the end of what you wrote – but you actually said what
the real deal is. Obama sent a sh-tload of weapons into Libya during the Gaddafi thing. Had no
idea who they were going to…just…tens of millions of dollars worth of high grade weaponry.
Now you think folks like al Qaeda and other militant groups won’t notice? It was a take what
you need weapons supermarket courtesy of the Obama government for them! Not much different
than what happened in Egypt.

UM: How so?

WHI: You got Egypt. You got Libya. Both of them were run by…basically they guys running the
show were non-practicing Muslims, right? Mubarak – he couldn’t stand the Muslim hardliners
and he beat the sh-t out of them every chance he got. Him and his military cronies. So he kept the
peace that way. He kept business open to American and European interests. Things weren’t
perfect, but a hell of a lot better than say,Iran. He could tell Iran to shut the f-ck up, and Iran had
to consider it because Egypt had some real muscle. It had a military, and it had the backing of the

(Barack Obama shaking hands with former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak. A year later Obama
would be calling for Mubarak’s removal from power)

Now Libya…Gadaffi was a real sh*t. Sick bastard. But like Mubarak – he didn’t like the Muslim
hardliners in Libya either. Especially if they were gonna cause trouble for him. So he would
intimidate the sh-t out of them too. At least over the last decade or so. Gaddafi had two coming
to God moments in his life. The first was when Reagan bombed the hell out of his palace. He
knew he coulda died then. He knew the West could come in and take his life if it wanted. So he
moderated. Then there was 9-11. And when Bush went into Iraq and did his thing – they found
Hussein and put him on trial and hung the bastard…that scared the hell out of Gaddafi. Really
got inside his head. So he moderated some more. He was actually…my understanding…he was
actually becoming a regular contributor to our Intel. By that time he couldn’t stand al Qaeda
anymore than we could. Maybe less so because they posed an even more direct threat to him.

And what happens? The dumbest pile of sh-t that has ever sat in that White House helps to force
Mubarak and Gaddafi out – and we got no real plan for the aftermath. All kinds of people are
telling the administration the Muslim Brotherhood could take overEgypt. Could take over Libya.
They either ignored those warning or that is EXACTLY what they wanted to happen.
They are warned that Gadaffi’s departure will create more chaos in Libya and there are a sh-tload
of weapons that will be unaccounted for. That is exactly what happens. Obama doesn’t give a sh-
t. Too busy golfing. Doing the talk shows. Right? Telling Israel to go f-ck themselves. Dancing
around Iran instead of punching them right in their f-cking face. Jarrett is Iranian. Jarrett has long
ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. You would think, maybe for one f-cking second, enough people
in the media would think maybe – just maybe…we should take a closer look at all this.


What if that ambassador fella…what if he was killed by weapons sent there by Barack Obama?
Just like you said in that off-handed way. And what if there are tens of thousands of those
weapons being used by al Qaeda right now? Maybe on their way to the Israeli border? And not
just guns ‘cause that’s not all we were sending into Libya you know. We’re talking some high
powered take down an airliner kinda stuff.

And take it a bit further. We did that. And we did it knowingly. We did it willingly. The Obama
White House. Their hand picked stooges in the military, in State. They did that.

Now let me go one little step more here. What if that ambassador…well…let’s say he came
across certain information…damaging to the administration. Why is he flying into that consulate
in Benghazi? Cover of night. No security precautions. Anti-Western sentiment reaching critical
levels. It’s almost like he was trying to keep his whereabouts unknown to his own government.
Right? And that bullsh-t little YouTube video thing? It had been out for…what – months?
Nobody gave a sh-t about it. NOBODY.
But then it is being used as the spark to start the fire? Who did that? Who would want to get
those sand…get those people are riled up like that? And the administration – they are saying it
was that video right out of the gate, right? Like it was a packaged excuse ready to go. Packaged
means it was part of something bigger. A bigger plan, right?

UM: (Interrupts) Hold on – I apologize. I just want to ask you if this is all your own speculation –
or if you received information. (Military Insider?) You’re getting pretty specific here – and that
usually – all the times we’ve done this…usually means you received information from another

WHI: This is me. Just me.

…so like I said…the video thing…it’s part of a packaged plan. They are running that excuse
HARD. Libyans are saying it’s bullsh-t. London media…they got a sh-tload of people in Libya
too who know – there is stuff going on between us and the Brits…they ain’t happy with Obama.
Not all of them.

So basically everyone BUT the Obama administration is saying the Benghazi attack was pre-
planned, right? Terrorist attack. And what is Barack Obama doing right at that time? He’s flying
to Vegas. He’s doing goofy interviews. His White House just keeps repeating the video excuse
over and over again.

So is this all just a pile of incompetent sh-t by the Obama administration? By Clinton? Did you
notice how Defense said very little? And the CIA…Petraeus… has said nothing? In this town,
some times the ones speaking the loudest are the ones not saying a word.

UM: And then we get the “secret” Romney 47% video released.

WHI: Right – right. Obama was starting to take on just a little bit of heat on the Middle East sh-t
and that tape comes out. That thing wasn’t meant to come out this early. Late October, maybe –
certainly not now. But they are so spooked and confused over the polling data, they released it
sooner. That means the Middle East situation has them afraid. People are actually asking some
questions now. Sniffing around the situation just a bit. And if they get somebody in the
military…somebody like that…to go on the record with this…with whatever had that
ambassador acting so strangely right before he was killed…well-well-well…

UM: So you’re going conspiracy on this?

WHI: Oh yeah. That was no accidental killing of the ambassador. And it wasn’t just

al-Qaeda acting alone. They had approval. From somebody linked with our side of the fence.

UM: And you’re really just speculating here?

WHI: (Pause)
…Sure. Just me on this…just me thinking on Barack Obama – the Butcher of Benghazi.

UM: That has a ring to it.

WHI: The truth often does.

UM: Even if we win this election…Obama is defeated. Is there still time to save this country? Or
are we too far gone?

WHI: You been talking to the Old Man? ‘Cause that’s EXACTLY how he put it to me a few
days back. Too far gone. Somethin’ about…he went on about muni bonds. How that Ponzi
scheme…how he didn’t think they could stop the collapse. I don’t understand all that sh-t.


You haven’t talked to him?

UM: No – not recently.

WHI: Well…he’s…he told me so I don’t think he’d mind you knowing.

UM: Knowing what?
WHI: He’s…how’d he put it? Closing shop? Already has the family out you know. Like he said
he would. Now he’s getting ready…even with his health…he’s considering going himself. Not
sure how he’d manage his treatments… He’s about as paranoid as I’ve ever seen him…and that
goes back a while.

UM: Why? Something…was there a specific event that got him so spooked?

WHI: I don’t wanna talk for him – shouldn’t even be talking this much about him.


He said this though…he said…and maybe this is why he isn’t including you. For some kind of
protection. Doesn’t want you involved. He seems determined about something. Not sure what
he’s got planned – but he’s up to somethin’.

…Said people have forgotten that there is both a loving god and a righteous god and that it’s
gonna be a righteous god America is about to meet up with.

UM: What do you think that’s supposed to mean?

WHI: Not sure. It means something – he don’t talk to talk. But who knows? He’s lookin’ to meet
up with God soon enough I suppose.

UM: And he said that the situation is “too far gone” for America?

WHI: That’s how he put it. Word for word. That’s why I thought you talked with him recently.

UM: How about my question – what do YOU think? Is America too far gone?

WHI: Hell son…I ain’t never gonna give up on this old girl. Her and I…it’s been a lifelong love
affair. She’s a tired and cranky b-tch…but so am I.

Semper Fi motherf-cker.

…I don’t quit.




   About the Ulsterman Website more of this author

    Be courteous to all, but intimate with few, and let those few be well tried before you give them your
    confidence. -G. Washington

    102 Comments to WHITE HOUSE INSIDER: ” Barack Obama – The Butcher of Benghazi.”


                 o      Whistleblower
                        September 20, 2012 at 6:25 pm

                     o DoJ silences Obama associate Daniel S. Mahru with his freedom
        2.   Reply


                 o      BigTexas
                        September 20, 2012 at 6:27 pm

                     o WOW. This is a lot to digest. When is the FnF hearing on the report? Today? And so WHI is telling us they
                         think the ambassador was killed by Obama? Something along those lines? What does he mean by the
                         ambassador “acting strange”? Got a ton of questions here. Just WOW.


                                 NameBM
                                  September 20, 2012 at 7:59 pm

                               What I think WSI is elluding to is the fact that Obama and co., and by that I mean the International
                                   movement which want the end of the American experience and American Capitalism, are aiming
                                   at chaos. It is in the vacuum created by chaos that they implement their philosophy. That’s their
                                   way. Historically always have been.

                                   So if this clique gets another term, they will bring upon us controlled chaos. If Oama is not
                                   reelected, they will push for uncontrolled choas. They have no faith at all in the Americans people
                                   to be able to react with reason to chaos, so they are just preparing for the choes to come.
            When Bernake announced Open end Q3, WSI knew the train was now a runaway, and that the
            only thing to do was to get out of the way and prepare for the consequences of the incoming

            He is getting out of the way. Good for him to be able to do so. Most of us won’t have this luxury.

            About F&F ala Muslim, I also think it stinks. From what does it stinks I do not know yet, but I
            agree with UM and WHI on this one. The guns were transferred locally by the Obama
            administration to forment upheaval in the Middle-East, and probably to facilitate attacks against
            Israel. Not as an end but as another element of chaos.

            May be Stevens was a agent of chaos control. Obama wanted to lead from behind in Libya. I told
            us so. But Al Quaeda is all grown up and do not want to be controlled, told when and who attack.
            From there to now, what went on I do not know. But I think people familiar with F&F Mexico
            have the answers, because it is the same blueprint. And it probably produced the same messy

            It will turn out that all the people who did drag their feet to bring Holder down, have the blood of
            4 more Americans and counting on their hands. Exposing F&F Mexico would have probably
            prevented F&F Libya.

o   Reply


                      bill o'rights
                       September 21, 2012 at 12:35 am

                     Spot on analysis!
                        Absolutely spot on!

           Reply


                                 VTX
                                  September 21, 2012 at 2:23 am

                                Explains the Far West Whitehouse, too – the Hawaiian Obama mansion. They
                                   expect the east coast to be toast, or under several hundred feet of seawater.

              Perceptible Future
               September 21, 2012 at 2:55 am

             I told you Al-Qaeda IS CIA-run. The whole story falls apart. The Ambassador knew the
                inner machinations involving the relationship between our government, the CIA, and Al-
                Qaeda. It revolves around destroying the 2nd Amendment, putting in place a Police-
                State, and getting us used to government authority controlling us. Remember, first you
                have to control the means whereby citizens can defend themselves. Here’s a story you
                might remember several months ago. If you think our CIA works for us think again:
                And the real reason for the timidity of the Republicans? Their in one the looting of the
                citizens! I’ve said it several times before: This whole Left-Right paradigm is just a
                distraction. Both heads are connected to the same body. Look, there is a reason congress
                only gas a 8% approval rating… Sad but true… Where’s our next George Washington?
                We need him now just as before…

   Reply


                         CitizenWatcher
                          September 21, 2012 at 5:32 am

                        The CIA plays both sides. Some are patriots, some are lefty commis and or
                           MBH supporters; Like stevens, a hardcore lefty, rah raw arab spring. He
                           would never turn on Obama. He was most likely set up though, think of it as
                           the duke Ferdinand moment.

                           The goal was to play the video card to charge after the 1st amendment while
                           the fires continued to burn across the ME putting pressure on israel and
                           america. Gas prices, more military garbage, stranding US military in BFE?
                           China goes, Russia, South America? $20 gas, inflation? Invasion? Pure
                           conjecture on my part but the libya hit plan may have backfired. Maybe.

              Reply


                         Publius
                          September 21, 2012 at 7:22 am
                                             Radio transmitters in your teeth putting out static again?


                                                        Perceptible Future
                                                         September 21, 2012 at 10:39 pm

                                                      @Publius Oh that’s right, your world has pretty Unicorns prancing
                                                          about with rainbow skittles shooting out of their butts and lovely
                                                          candy cotton dreams floating gently within your tiny reach. How so
                                                          very quaint.
                                                          You go right ahead and grab your beddy-teddy and snuggle into
                                                          your cozy little princess bed and leave the hard work for the men
                                                          and women who don’t mind doing the heavy lifting for the naivete
                                                          and unawares. Sleep tight.


         o      readyornot
                September 20, 2012 at 7:03 pm

             o Heard some visions lately, dreams even, of NYC getting a bashing. I’d get out of that place post haste…


         o      57th State
                September 20, 2012 at 7:09 pm

             o This makes me physically ill.

                          Kat
                           September 20, 2012 at 7:13 pm

                         Me too. Very worried about what is happening right now.


         o      Kat
                September 20, 2012 at 7:12 pm

             o The thought of someone as powerful as WSI being so afraid and thinking America is “too far gone” has me
                 feeling very uneasy. Watching the news today, it does seem like the world is on fire. I have a friend who
                 mentioned all casual about the riots in Pakistan. I asked her if she realized Pakistan has nuclear weapons and
                 her eyes got all big and she was like WHAT? The look crazy! I think it started to sink in how dangerous
                 things are right now. And it all happened during the worst president in my lifetime. Barack Obama.


                          E.A.B.
                           September 20, 2012 at 9:51 pm

                         Usually it’s the most powerful people that tend to underestimate the strength of the little guy. Even
                             when they’re on our side.
                             I know WSI loves America deeply. Someday soon he’ll realize we’re even tougher than he thinks.

         o      Reply


                                    Air Force Brat
                                     September 21, 2012 at 12:20 am

                                   Excellent point, E.A.B.
                                       Also, with all the weirdness going on, it’s easy for people to sometimes forget who is
                                       REALLY in charge. Not B.H.O. Not George Soros. Not the Illuminati (if they exist).
                                       Nope, God Almighty is the one who’s really in charge.

                                       And that should be of immense comfort in these troubling times.
                          Reply


                                     bill o'rights
                                      September 21, 2012 at 12:47 am

                                    I couldn’t agree more.


         o      Essa
                September 20, 2012 at 7:26 pm

             o How can any of us be sure al Qaeda is not really a CIA asset? Ambassador Stevens apparently knew he was
                 on the al Qaeda kill list, hence it comes out he had no security, not even bullet proof glass at the embassy. If
                 al Qaeda is really an asset, it explains why our government ignored the warnings and allowed Ambassador
                 Stevens to be murdered with the government using a movie as an excuse then changing the narrative to a
                 planned terror plot when the movie excuse didn’t work.

                 The world is a stage, a scene for the next money making war, the military industrial complex is America’s
                 economy, thus in reality we are the United States Corporation whether we like it or not.

                 The blood stripe smears on the wall of consultant building in Libya strike a grotesque resemblance to the
                 new dictator like flag called Our Stripes flag print for sale at the Obama store. Even the color of the painted
                 stripes resembles blood smears. Obama approved that message, the message of blood on his hands on sale
                 for $35.00.

8.   Reply


                          Randall
                           September 20, 2012 at 8:59 pm

                         Yes, and Gen. Patreus is the new bin Laden. Sure.

                            Randall
                             September 20, 2012 at 10:29 pm

                           Would advise reading this paper by Doug Farah for a realistic view of terrorist organizations and

          o       Reply


          o      Whistleblower
                 September 20, 2012 at 7:38 pm

              o Obama’s Chicago Arab-American network comes into focus
10.   Reply


          o      Ylem
                 September 20, 2012 at 7:43 pm

              o I’ve been planning my exit for a while now. The car is packed with camping gear. I’ve stocking up on rice,
                  flour, sugar, etc. and I have a couple choices of where to go. I’m keeping my gas tank full for a fast exit and
                  all my important docs in a bag, ready to go. I suggest you all do the same.


                            VTX
                             September 21, 2012 at 2:24 am
                           I plan to stay. Home sweet Alamo!


                            Vyxen
                             September 21, 2012 at 4:57 am

                           There’s a gentleman by the name of Frefal Aguirre who wrote a book called The Modern Survival
                              Manual. It’s about surviving the economic collapse of Argentina. Have read bits of it, the gist is
                              that services in the city and burbs will sort of remain, while those alone on their farms are often
                              brutalized because of their isolation.
                              Something to ponder.

          o       Reply


          o      R. J.
                 September 20, 2012 at 8:30 pm

              o Leap 2020 (European think tank) put out a bulletin that its going to unravel in October…


          o      USA4ever
                 September 20, 2012 at 9:05 pm

              o Wait, wait, wait.
                  WSI has done all this work to remove Obama from office. QE3 comes and all the sudden WSI is like “Welp,
                  I tried. I’m out”???

                  COME ON. This can’t be.

                  We are not too far gone. We are winning this thing and will win on Nov. 6.

                  These satanic pieces of sh#t are not going to prevail.

14.   Reply

             MEL
              September 20, 2012 at 9:09 pm



                         R.J.
                          September 20, 2012 at 11:03 pm

                        We are in uncharted waters here. The domestic politics is only one front on this thing. We
                           have a global financial collapse of epic proportions that is going to happen and
                           geopolitical upheavals in the middle east and far east to boot. This is going to be real
                           real bad no matter who wins, the greatest depression and WWIII.
                           It’s time to prepare and time to pray…do it while you still have time.

              Reply


                                     silverdust
                                      September 20, 2012 at 11:34 pm

                                    as well as Glenn are beginning 40 days of prayer and
                                       fasting beginning next week and ending on Election Day. Divine Providence
                                       is the only thing that will be saving us and the country. Please join in.

              bill o'rights
               September 21, 2012 at 1:17 am

             Well over half of my career has been in Finance, either as a trader or a financial advisor.
                 Allow me to put things into perspective:

                 It would be better for a comet to hit the Earth than to face what we all face in the imminent future.

                 And, it will be when we are at our weakest…starving and desperate, when the forces that be will
                 be able to seal our fates and carry out the final acts of tyranny that end our freedoms.

                 Be prepared. Be ready. And, if you love freedom, be willing to die for it.

                 For my part, I’ll just be happy that my wife will finally stop bitching about a bigger house.

                 And, while I’m not real hopeful about my own survival, if they bring the fight to my doorstep, it’s
                 my sincerest hope that I can hasten the demise of one or two pinko-commie sons of bitches.

o   Reply


                          USA4ever
                           September 21, 2012 at 5:38 am

                         So what are we talking?
                            Cities and towns made of dust with a whistling, lone wind blowing the tumbleweeds
                            through the streets?

                            Hollowed out and abandoned grocery stores?

                            People surviving on stashes of recalled Kal Kan?

                            I don’t mean to be obtuse but surely we can see how absurd such a scenario is. And it’s
                            the type of scenario being pushed more and more. I really think there is some latent
                            “world ends in 2012″ nuttery behind much of this thinking out there.

                            We may be in the end times but there is still much to be done before Jesus returns. To
                            the best of my understanding, God is simply not going to allow the world to implode at
                            this moment and not like this.

                            Victory, folks. Seek the Lord and we will have victory. The next four years won’t be a
                            hopeless, barren wasteland of an existence. It’s going to be a comeback and restoration
                            never before seen.

               Reply

                           bill o'rights
                            September 21, 2012 at 11:59 am

                          I haven’t much perpective regarding end times/armageddon


                           bill o'rights
                            September 21, 2012 at 12:15 pm

                          I haven’t much perspective on end times/armageddon, but Obama would make
                             the perfect antichrist.

                             What I can say is that your grocery store analogy rings true. From an
                             economic perspective, it doesn’t just look possible, it looks likely.

                             My guess is that QE3 was designed to trigger the collapse of the currency
                             derivatives market, which is stacked up like a house of cards or a Jenga game.
                             Remember, we’re talking about $200 trillion that comes crashing down,
                             should the markets exceed the firms’ stops.

                             This is the scenario…

                             Cash is hyperinflated. Companies close their doors. Credit cards are useless.
                             Few are working, so there is massive demand and very little supply. People
                             get desperate. The government offers food for firearms. Chaos ensues.

                             We’re closer than you think.

                Reply


       Marlowe
        September 21, 2012 at 3:25 am

     What WSI is concerned about is one thing and one thing only. MASSIVE inflation.
        One can have stored all of the food and ammunition in the World but when that runs out and bread
        is $25/loaf and ammunition is $50/shell massive chaos will soon follow.
            That is why he made the comment about the coming Muni-Bond disaster . WSI well knows that
            when your money goes up in smoke big trouble follows.

o   Reply


                       Jules
                        September 21, 2012 at 12:20 pm

                     I wish WSI would get in touch with UM, who then, in turn, could enlighten us a little.
                         Strange days, strange days.

           Reply


                       USA4ever
                        September 21, 2012 at 1:22 pm

                     I understand these possibilities. I really do.
                         I’m just saying God is not going to allow the world to be plunged into darkness and

                         While the Obama years have pushed us right to the very edge, there would be no lesson
                         to learn, no reprimand to heed, if everything were destroyed and lives were ruined.

                         Nope. Now isn’t the time for such tribulation. More things to happen first, more lives to
                         change direction.

           Reply


                                 bill o'rights
                                  September 23, 2012 at 9:57 pm

                               I appreciate your hope (and we’re going to need a lot of it), but this has nothing
                                   to do with God. These are the simple, inevitable consequences of the actions
                                   of man, according to the free will afforded man by God.
                                          And, we have had severe depressions before. In fact, the depression that hit
                                          this country in the 1870s was far worse than the depression of the 1930s.

                                          While some would argue that we’re due for another depression, I would argue
                                          that the depression before us is the most predictable and preventable
                                          depression the world has ever seen.

                                          Either way, our debt has now exceeded our annual productivity, REAL
                                          unemployment continues to rise, taxes are about to rise and we have forces in
                                          power who appear to be TRYING to destroy the economy…Obama,
                                          Bernanke, Lagarde.

                                          To make matters worse, derivatives markets are leveraged to the hilt, at a
                                          moment when the markets are likely to break through historical volatility
                                          ranges. Derivatives pricing and volatility are determined by models that break
                                          down when volatility crashes through the historical record.

                                          So, while I am in full support of being hopeful, man created this nightmare,
                                          not God, and man will face the consequences of his actions.

                             Reply


      o   JusticeForAll
          September 20, 2012 at 9:12 pm

      o Seems there are others who question Chris Stevens assignment and unfortunate demise. Found the following
          comment on another site very interesting:
          Is this what really happened to Ambassador Chris Stevens?

          There’s a lot of weirdness and unanswered (and unasked) questions circulating around the recent tragedy in
          Benghazi. For instance: What is a top diplomat–an ambassador–doing in Benghazi? That’s like wondering
          around East Palo Alto after dark with a sign on you saying “fat wallet, unarmed.” And ambassadors don’t
          travel “in the hold of cargo ships” to enter a country like his public bio has stated. Why was he in Benghazi
          in a regular unarmored car? Engineers in Iraq rode around in up armored cars and they’re no where near as
          important as an ambassador. Why did the SEAL protecting him state just a couple weeks earlier in an
          interview on ABC that he was “rounding up weapons in Libya?” Security detail do NOT double as weapons
          collection. And why did Sean Smith, one of the two SEALs, just minutes before his death, post a message
          on a gaming site that he might not live past the night?

          Is this what’s really going on. . ?

          Chris Stevens was not a pressed suit, pencil pushing, clean hands diplomat. He was a high level CIA
          operative. During the Arab Spring, Obama signed authorization to aid the Libyan rebels. He made it very
          public that this was not aid, it was approval to send aid. Any actual aid would be classified. And we heard
          nothing more on the question of aid since then.

          Chris Stevens was the CIA operative in charge of funding the Libyan rebels (who used Benghazi as a
          stonghold) and equiping them with arms. Now fast forward to today. As a matter of routine or as a special
          case the US now needs to round up the weapons it distributed. It would be a tragic embarrassment to have
          Americans in Libya killed by weapons issued by America. Other operatives gather the weapons in a place in
              Benghazi. The Libyans want to deal with the man himself who brokered the original deal not his “delegate”
              for “security” reasons. So Stevens gets a short notice call while in Europe that he needs to get to Libya
              ASAP. He flies into an undisclosed location and gets in an unarmored car to not attract attention. Something
              goes wrong with the deal and he is transfered to a consulate “safe house” which is nothing more elaborate
              than a rental house with burglar bars on the window. He and his security detail are inside and Sean Smith
              notices that cops are taking pictures of the exits (very strange and alarming) and posts his situation on the
              gaming website not because he has a hankering for some gaming but because he sees his situation is very
              bad and this is the only way (or the established way) to get a message out.

              Rockets hit. The SEALS die. Stevens dies of smoke inhalation. Then the attackers make a phone call to the
              organizers that the riots should now begin (Stevens died very shortly before the riots began. Coincidence?
              You would expect him to die after they started since the violence in the protests is blamed as the cause of his

              And now we’ve learned that the State Department has been in negotiations with Egypt to release Omar
              Abdel Rahman–the blind sheik responsible for the first World Trade Center bombing. Would this have been
              another appeasement to the Muslim Brotherhood had not the story been broken? (Since the story broke, a
              group of congressmen have issued an unequivical warning to the State Department that they should not and
              will not release the blind sheik.)

              What’s going on here?

16.   Reply


                        molly pitcher
                         September 20, 2012 at 11:19 pm

                       re Chris Stevens and CIA. This is exactly what Glenn Beck said on his Monday program…


                        Kay112
                         September 20, 2012 at 11:20 pm

                       I had to stop reading your post. I’ve been summoned away from the coputer, but I think you are
                          confused on a couple of issues…

                          2 SEALs: Dougherty and Woods were not there in Benghazi to protect Chris Stevens. There
                          mission was to track down weapons, I believe. The State Department was a bit deceptive on what
                          they were doing in Benghazi.

                          Sean Smith was not a SEAL. I think he may have been some for of programmer or computer
                          information guy who enjoyed playing internet games.
                             Although I may have spelled Dougherty’s sir name wrong, I believe I am pretty accurate on the
                             above info. Sorry, but I must run now.

          o      Reply


                           Ylem
                            September 20, 2012 at 11:39 pm

                          Getting rid of the evidence [Stevens and the other 3 men]. I think WHI is right. This is about
                             something very big for Obama to have an Abassador killed.


          o      Michigander
                 September 20, 2012 at 9:12 pm

              o Beck said something this week too, about Stevens being CIA, and being unprotected because it was somehow
                  connected to Fast N Furious.
                  Interesting, because it looks to me like the O WH is trying to do as much damage as possible on the sly
                  before January. Almost like they know…in spite of the polls looking so scary right now.

                  One of my family members said something to me recently about looking around for a place to go in case O
                  wins, but there isn’t any. Sorry folks, we’re it, we have to make a stand. China is on the verge of chaos,
                  Russia is a shambles, the Middle East is on fire, they’re waiting for us like vultures wait for an animal to die,
                  circling closer and closer, but cowards none-the-less, they wait. If it’s a large animal, they wait until after
                  the last breath, something smaller, they’ll move in sooner. It’s time that the Empty Chair realizes he owes an
                  apology to US. He needs to bow to US, he needs to be sensitive to US, he needs to stop insulting US. Look,
                  we’re the biggest animal out there, and we’re not a cow, we’re a lion, the vultures don’t dare move in until
                  we start to stink. Stand up, shake it off, and take a swipe at a couple of vultures.

18.   Reply


          o      VTX
                 September 20, 2012 at 9:42 pm
              o “It’s just me.”
                  He also said: what is unsaid is more powerful than what is said.

                  Safire used to be a good outlet; he got cut off. Somebody drew a line. But before that? We had patriots
                  working in many places in government back then, patriots who wanted to see us survive into the new

                  I agree with WSI and WHI; I see it coming in the winds.

20.   Reply


          o      E.A.B.
                 September 20, 2012 at 9:44 pm

              o WSI hit the nail on the head as to the problem with Obama’s “lead from behind” strategy in Libya: You have
                  no real control over who gets the weapons.

                  All the usual suspects argue that Obama’s approach to Libya was much smarter than Bush’s approach to
                  Iraq. But at least Bush’s approach kept Iraq from becoming a one-stop shop for terrorists who need heavy
                  weaponry. I can’t say the same for Obama in Libya.

                  The Iraq War era of the Improvised Explosive Device is over. Because of Obama’s strategy in Libya, al-
                  Qaeda has the un-improvised version now.

22.   Reply


          o      VTX
                 September 20, 2012 at 9:51 pm

              o I figured the ambassador was Intel of some sort; he had the air of a wannabee T.E. Lawrence. Read some
                  books on Lawrence – not the moviefied version, the kind he imagined.

                  It looked like he knew he was walking into a trap, too; he had the look of a squirrel that figures out that it’s
                  been caged. Seen that many times – squirrels, that is.

                  Don’t know who set it, but I’m guessing it wasn’t Obama. He doesn’t appear to know up from down at the
                  moment – totally confused. Obama looks like Ghaddafi after he’d been captured. He has an escape plan, too.

                  Shit? Meet fan.

24.   Reply

          o      truthandjustice
                 September 20, 2012 at 10:24 pm

              o Well, not much new here…I was hoping maybe more news about the false flag event, etc. but I don’t think
                  WHI would be able to know that. Understand WSI feelings. Agree that this latest Bernacke decision put the
                  last nail in the coffin – at least to the economy, which of course will affect everything else they have planned
                  for our demise. Read that elsewhere a lot. That will happen, no matter about the rest. However, possible we
                  can mess up their plans for the rest by having some whistleblowers like WHI mentioned come out
                  unexpectedly, with undeniable proof that the Obama Admin. are traitors, planning our take down & are
                  behind all this evil. Sounds to me like we’re really, really close to that as we speak. But we may have to
                  suffer some attacks, deaths to get there. Many of us knew about the wimpy, traitorous Repub. Establishment
                  which dominates right now – the ones he’s talking about that are really patriots and alarmed – trying to do
                  what they can but are limited b/c they are the newbies is the Tea Party crowd. They’re not in the
                  authoritative positions. Probably not as informed either.


          o      VTX
                 September 20, 2012 at 10:40 pm

              o Obama was set up on this one. He was told – by someone: “It’s all from the video. Wait and see.” There
                  wasn’t a sliver of light between all the administrations’ stories: it was all fed to them.

                  Now ordinarily I’d think that this was a Hillary-thing; she’s good at putting people in one room snd saying:
                  “this is the story.” But this wasn’t her. Came from elsewhere.

                  So Obama and his crew – including Rice – come off looking like uninformed doofuses (which they are,) but
                  this was meant to make them look like amateurs, to look foolish. They climbed back down, like a cat-in-a-

                  I’d like to congratulate the group or person who fed them the disinformation. I’m guessing it was either a
                  pro, or it was a medium of some sort, casting bones and entrails. One of Michelle’s voo-doo buddies (that’s
                  gonna come out eventually) maybe?

27.   Reply


          o      truthandjustice
                 September 20, 2012 at 11:14 pm
              o Think what WSI said about America going to see the “righteous” God means He is just and holy and He must
                  bring just “judgement” upon evil/sins of a nation after it has gone to “over-flowing” which we have. Think
                  it’s pretty evident how much we’ve fallen from our beginnings of a country based on Biblical standards by
                  godly Founders. Rebellion has led to the sorry state we’re in now. WSI is keenly aware of his own mistakes
                  and the destruction it has caused. Unfortunately, that is very widespread where nearly everything is corrupt
                  & you see rebellion about God’s laws all over the place. Enter….Obama and his demonic minions.
                  Personally, think he was allowed in to bring the judgement; however, the good news is God is ALSO a
                  “loving” God and He loves us and doesn’t want us destroyed even after we rejected Him & no doubt hopes
                  these tribulations will also prompt people to come back to Him so He can bless America….again. (I think
                  He will)

                  “If My people who are called by My name will humble themselves, and pray and seek My face, and turn
                  from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land.” 2
                  Chronicles 7:14

29.   Reply


                            Francesca
                             September 21, 2012 at 3:58 am

                          About that quote from II Chronicles: I hear that a lot these days, but I have to ask this question.
                              That promise was made to Soloman concerning Israel and was made on the occasion of the
                              dedication of Soloman’s Temple; are we sure it applies to us as well? Context is important with
                              regard to Scripture. I am not saying that God won’t help us, not at all; however, this particular
                              promise was made to cover a specific situation. Solomon was told that if he followed in the ways
                              of David in honoring the Lord, then God would bless them, but if they didn’t, He would punish
                              them. As far as America is concerned, as a nation, we have NOT followed in the ways of the Lord.
                              Perhaps God will have mercy on us. Let us pray and beg him for mercy. We surely do not deserve
                              it. If we as a people don’t return to the ways of the Lord, judgment will surely come. WSI is
                              correct: God is both loving and holy. His patience does not last forever. Thoughts?


                                      truthandjustice
                                       September 21, 2012 at 3:54 pm

                                    Yes, it is indeed very important about context and I understand what you’re saying & is
                                        true re certain subjects but I think there are certain basic, general principles that never
                                        change just as the nature of God never changes….like He still hates lying, murder, etc.,
                                        but if you sincerely repent & change your evil ways, God will forgive and bless (either
                                        spiritually, physically or both, etc.) He blessed Israel when they repented and obeyed,
                                        He brought down discipline and “judgement” when they went astray. That “princple”
                                        doesn’t change & mentioned in the New Testament. Sometimes He wipes out the whole
                                        nation or city; sometimes He just allows a certain amount to be done in hopes it will
                                        wake people up and bring them to humble repentance, acknowledging Him for who He
                                        is & crying out for His help & then He can justly bless and restore.
                                      He knows the future and He knows how many ppl He has in a nation & how many will
                                      do this if this happens before He allows it. It’s all taken into consideration & only He
                                      knows. I am hoping and praying that there are enough of us here that are already like
                                      that and will react “righteously” to traumatic events. I know there are innumerable
                                      Christians here and all over the world who are praying and repenting about this that
                                      you’re not going to hear on our news of course. But only God knows the numbers &
                                      what is all involved. Most of them and I believe that God has always planned for
                                      America to help Israel and spread the gospel before “the end” comes.
                                      Personally, I don’t believe Obama is the anti-Christ at all & it’s not like most “Western”
                                      churches teach that we will all become part of the NWO which they are trying to do now
                                      big time. Think they will come “CLOSE” but not succeed with us. According to some,
                                      more knowledgeable about the Mid-East & their mindset (& wrote the Bible), it will be
                                      the Islamic Caliphate, headquarters in Turkey and America could very well be one of the
                                      main nations that will help defeat them in the end as suggested in the OT about nations
                                      doing that – which most Christians in the West have failed to see.
                                      It’s all in the book “God’s War on Terror” by Walid Shoebat who was born in
                                      Bethlehem (interesting ?) & is an ex-Muslim terrorist converted to Christianity. His
                                      view is more correct I believe – has many scriptures to back it up. I highly recommend
                                      it. You can also see it on his website:
                                      This interpretation is spreading here…as the Bible has told us that we will be more
                                      enlightened about all this in the end times. Another good book, “The Harbinger” about
                                      Israel & America, by Jonathan Kahn.
                                      Anyway, therefore I personally think we have a really good chance that we will be
                                      restored (to be involved to help Israel, spreading the gospel, fight Islamic
                                      Caliphate/antiChrist at the very end) But we will have to endure a lot of destruction first
                                      & win over the invaders, end the Obama nightmare with the truth finally coming
                                      out………we should PREPARE, spiritually & physically & still work hard for Romney
                                      and vote if we have the elections. Maybe it could be that we will have the elections later
                                      at another time after we win the “war” and/or use those results if Romney wins, to go
                                      ahead and install him. Who knows. The “enemy” thinks THEY are the ones in charge &
                                      they aren’t – God is. They can only do what God allows. Hopefully then, after “our hard
                                      lessons are learned”, we will START OVER, living like the Founders
                                      intended……BACK TO THE FUTURE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                          Reply


          o      holly
                 September 20, 2012 at 11:36 pm

              o “After nearly two years and $86 million worth of noisy and disruptive construction, the West Wing has
                  emerged from its visual seclusion remarkably unchanged. And deep underground, whatever has been built
                  there remains shrouded in mystery.”
                  This bothers me.

31.   Reply

                    VTX
                     September 20, 2012 at 11:50 pm

                   Maybe it’s connected to the World Bank tunnels?


                               charlotte
                                September 21, 2012 at 2:31 am

                              I think these are underground bunkers. Just like the one Hitler and Eva Braun escaped to
                                 when everything fell around them They are probably connected to the World bank
                                 Tunnels and maybe even to an airport so the traitors can escape/ Now I wish someone
                                 would bribe a workman at the site to talk…


                               bill o'rights
                                September 21, 2012 at 1:43 pm

                              Really like the Hitler/Eva analogy.
                                 But, in a different way, I’d love to see that analogy proven correct.

                    Reply


      o   Ylem
          September 21, 2012 at 12:00 am
              o Thanks to WSI and WHI for giving us this warning, re the collapse of the bond market, i.e. the economy. I’m
                  certainly heeding this warning. We’re all watching the ‘signs’ so we’ll know when to get to a safe place with
                  food, water, etc. I think WSI has pretty much told us as much.


          o      charlotte
                 September 21, 2012 at 12:24 am

                  ” The officials provided the information to the Washington Guardian, saying they feared the Obama
                  administration’s scant description of the episode left a misimpression that the two ex-Navy SEALs might
                  have been responsible for the ambassador’s personal safety or become separated from him.

                  “Woods and Doherty weren’t part of the detail, nor were they personally responsible for the ambassador’s
                  security, but they stepped into the breach when the attacks occurred and their actions saved others lives —
                  and they shouldn’t be lumped in with the security detail,” one senior official said, speaking only on
                  condition of anonymity because he wasn’t authorized to speak publicly about the State Department. …

                  In fact, officials said, the two men were personal service contractors whose official function was described
                  as “embassy security,” but whose work did not involve personal protection of the ambassador or perimeter
                  security of the compound.

                  Former Navy SEALS, who were in Libya as private contractors, were serving in some capacity unrelated to
                  their official titles. That’s pretty vague, but you can probably connect your own dots from there. Whatever
                  Woods and Doherty were doing, they were not in Benghazi as State Department employees, nor were they
                  tasked with directly protecting the ambassador or the compound.

                  And yet both Hillary Clinton and Susan Rice have implied they were providing embassy security for the
                  State Department at the time of the attack. During an interview with Jake Tapper earlier this week, Rice
                  rejected charges that the State Department hadn’t provided adequate security for the consulate, saying that
                  “two of the four Americans who were killed were there providing security” along with “other colleagues
                  who were doing the same with them.”

34.   Reply


          o      charlotte
                 September 21, 2012 at 12:26 am

                  The officials provided the information to the Washington Guardian, saying they feared the Obama
                  administration’s scant description of the episode left a misimpression that the two ex-Navy SEALs might
                  have been responsible for the ambassador’s personal safety or become separated from him.
                   “Woods and Doherty weren’t part of the detail, nor were they personally responsible for the ambassador’s
                   security, but they stepped into the breach when the attacks occurred and their actions saved others lives —
                   and they shouldn’t be lumped in with the security detail,” one senior official said, speaking only on
                   condition of anonymity because he wasn’t authorized to speak publicly about the State Department. …

                   In fact, officials said, the two men were personal service contractors whose official function was described
                   as “embassy security,” but whose work did not involve personal protection of the ambassador or perimeter
                   security of the compound.

                   Former Navy SEALS, who were in Libya as private contractors, were serving in some capacity unrelated to
                   their official titles. That’s pretty vague, but you can probably connect your own dots from there. Whatever
                   Woods and Doherty were doing, they were not in Benghazi as State Department employees, nor were they
                   tasked with directly protecting the ambassador or the compound.

                   And yet both Hillary Clinton and Susan Rice have implied they were providing embassy security for the
                   State Department at the time of the attack. During an interview with Jake Tapper earlier this week, Rice
                   rejected charges that the State Department hadn’t provided adequate security for the consulate, saying that
                   “two of the four Americans who were killed were there providing security” along with “other colleagues
                   who were doing the same with them.”

36.   Reply


          o       USA4ever
                  September 21, 2012 at 12:48 am

              o I hate to belabor this but I’m really angry after reading this update.
                   I feel like we’ve essentially been told it’s over and to give up. Hope WSI takes some time soon to update us
                   because WHI made all this seem like one huge white flag.

                   What happened to all this “Romney’s actually winning swing states” talk? Does the presidential election
                   even matter anymore?

                   Say what you will but I don’t think there’s some apocalyptic global collapse coming. Things might get more
                   difficult but we and the world aren’t turning into a Mad Max movie or some other raggy scene.

                   It’s important to be on our toes but this “world is ending” shit has got to stop. It’s not the truth and it’s not

38.   Reply


                           Jules
                            September 21, 2012 at 3:32 am
             You are not alone, USA.
                This is one big, stinkin’ flippin’ psyop!

                I ain’t fallin’ for it. And I aint’ headin’ for for no underground bunker neither.

                Mssrs. Insider, get a life.

                The U.S. was not alone in the whole Egypt “revolution”/Libya war/not-war-really. We are not
                alone in the Syria thing as everyone knows dern good and well.

                No offense, UM, but this is just useless, though still slightly entertaining.

o   Reply


                         Obeline
                          September 21, 2012 at 3:54 am

                        Agree with you both, Jules and USA.
                           Something just didn’t set right.

                           I was left with feeling ” YOU built this, bud. Fix it, or shut up.”

              Reply


                                   CitizenWatcher
                                    September 21, 2012 at 5:37 am

                                 No psyop.
                                     Unfortunately the nail has come in the coffin with QE3 – for you to realize
                                     that is ignorance. We either get massive hyper inflation or straight on collapse.

                                     We can’t stop the FED but what we can do is make sure good people are in
                                     place when the collapse happens.

                                     “For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy
                                     that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence–on
                                     infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on
                                     intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by
                                     day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources
                                     into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines
                                     military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political
   Reply


               USA4ever
                September 21, 2012 at 5:54 am

             Funny how no one was shouting from the rooftops about the lethal
                danger of a QE3 until very recently.
                Suddenly we’re screwed beyond repair. Abandon hope! The world’s
                going to detonate any second!

                Again, why wasn’t anyone warning about QE3 long before
                Bernanke flipped the switch on it?

                We went from hope of turning this around, starting with the election,
                to “It’s too late, forget everything and give up.” Laughable. If I
                didn’t know better I’d peg all this collapse talk as a form of voter


               Jules
                September 21, 2012 at 11:40 am

             I understand, C.W. I was actually coming here this morning to
                apologize for flying off the handle and getting carried away out of
                frustration with that comment.

                Sometimes I need to take my own advice and get a grip, even as
                things unravel around the globe, even chez Jules.

                Anyway…psyop or not, things aren’t what they seem, or at least
                there is a lot of critical information we don’t have (nothing new
                there, I guess).

                Sorry if I was rude.


               bill o'rights
                September 21, 2012 at 2:01 pm
                     @USA4EVER,
                         People HAVE been screaming about the dangers of QE3, just not
                         the MSM.

                         The proof is becoming quite evident. Have you taken a look at your
                         grocery bill lately? How about gold prices? Keep in mind, there
                         aren’t enough deep-pocketed sconspiracy theorists in the world to
                         justify the huge hikes we’ve seen in gold prices…only institutional
                         investors can drive the markets like that.


              Publius
               September 21, 2012 at 6:01 am

             I agree.
                Reading all the posts on here, I’m beginning to wonder if there’s some lithium
                shortage in U.S. pharmacies right now.

   Reply


                        Jules
                         September 21, 2012 at 11:46 am



                        BigTexas
                         September 22, 2012 at 3:19 am

                     WSI warned about QE3 over the summer. Nobody else was talking
                         about it. He even gave us the time it would happen, and it did. He
                         said if it happened it would be big trouble. And he’s right. Like
                         some of you said, the mega inflation situation is right around the
                         corner. And it will be the whole world that gets taken for a very bad
                         ride. Pray to God that isn’t how it goes but its getting real close to
                         being there IMO.

                                              AmericaTheBeautiful
                                               September 21, 2012 at 6:06 am

                                              Agree…


          o      InTheKnow
                 September 21, 2012 at 1:15 am

              o This is a troubling update, because of what WHI is saying.
                  For now, I don’t care about Holder. If Obama loses, Holder is gone. That’s good enough for me.

                  It sounds like we have to follow two parallel tracks right now. First, work like hell to beat Obama in
                  November. Second, keep one eye out for whatever it is that WSI thinks may be coming.

                  I don’t think either WHI or WSI is ‘giving up.’ Neither of them seems like that kind of person. We have
                  about 7 weeks left to win this election and get the Obama camp on their way to Hawaii or Chicago or

                  This was never going to be easy, and there will always be those too weak to stand up. So, the burden falls on
                  the rest of us.

                  Keep working, keep plugging away. Finally today, the Romney campaign (through Bay Buchanan) started
                  to talk about the rigged polls. Good. That is a step.

                  Obama still loses if the GOP gets out to vote. There is no way he can win with the current party registration
                  and Independents tendencies.

                  Now is not the time for recriminations (hey, you helped Obama get in the White House in the first place) or
                  circular firing squads, in my opinion. We must pull together now and win at the ballot box in November.

                  WHI talked little here because he has work to do. So do all of us. The keys are likely to be Ohio and Florida.
                  Anything anyone can do there could be a big boost.

                  The fallout from Libya will continue, I am sure. Yes, Obama is likely to try a “hero justice” move before the
                  election, but his administration’s narrative on the “movie caused it” lie is falling apart. That wound needs to
                  be continually picked at between now and the election.

40.   Reply

              bill o'rights
               September 21, 2012 at 2:15 am

             What WSI is referring to is complete global financial meltdown.
                Think clean water, food, toilet paper, firearms and ammunition and ways to keep your family
                warm and provide fuel for cooking.

o   Reply


                          BigTexas
                           September 22, 2012 at 3:20 am

                         Yes. People who don’t take this stuff serious are crazy. Things could go from bad to
                            worse real fast.


              TX Boy
               September 21, 2012 at 3:18 am

             I’m with you, In The Know… I agree that we can win this election and that’s the first step. The
                polls are all cooked in the Dems favor, but it’s a dish they’ll have to eat with crow in November
                because they can only lie for so long until the real results come in. I don’t think that WSI is giving
                up — that’s not exactly what WHI said… I would think he’s just making his contingency plans for
                safety’s sake. We don’t know that the statement means he’s leaving the country — he may just be
                leaving New York… something he alluded to a year ago that he might do if it became necessary
                when the OWS crowd started up. What WHI did say was this about WSI — “He seems
                determined about something. Not sure what he’s got planned – but he’s up to somethin’.”

                That does not sound to me like a man who has thrown in the towel… “closing up shop” reminds
                me of hurricane preparations… you may be boarding up the place to protect against the coming
                storm, but you’re doing so with the intention of returning… you’re only leaving the current
                location for safer ground.

                I know I was laughed at a little before when I posted about those rioters in the ME wearing those
                “Guy Fawkes” masks… but I still say that could be some kind of warning shot being fired across
                the bow… to whom I don’t know, but it’s just too coincidental IMHO.
                Also — remember back in June, WSI said to “watch Italy” and that German Chancellor Merkel
                was under intense pressure from LaGarde and the IMF and he hoped that she could keep them at
                bay. Now I read recently that she’s having to fight against the establishment of a “Central Bank”
                that has authority over ALL BANKS in the region — where ALL national governments would
                have to surrender control of their banks to this one authority. Just another nail in the coffin for
                Europe — and VERY interesting that they’re just proposing it in September but saying that it has
                to happen by January 1st… interestingly enough that’s when it we’re expecting to send Obama off
                to retire in Hawaii for good… so I see that as a very important power grab that MUST be done, in
                their eyes, before it’s too late and they lose their opportunity to do so.

                Pray for Chancellor Merkel to stay strong in the face of intense pressure.

                For us — first things first… we need to prepare for high inflation causing basic necessities to cost
                more than we can afford… so prepare now and begin stockpiling water and durable goods. And
                most importantly GO VOTE IN NOVEMBER… DO NOT GIVE UP AND NEVER QUIT! It’s
                up to all of us to save this great nation of our’s… and we WILL PERSEVERE!

o   Reply


              cobra
               September 21, 2012 at 6:34 pm

             I think it is NY…
                The likelihood of a major terrorist attack in NY has grown exponentially, since the “arab spring”
                morphed into the current nightmare.
                Imagine Israel hits Iran or vice-versa.
                Automatically NY (and the US) can and will become part of the battle field.
                Furthermore, if Obama gets re-elected, the American people have seen nothing anything remotely
                close to what will happen to the society and our people..
                If Obama is targeting repubic donors now, what will he do after the election in case he wins by
                hook or by crook?
                What the WSI is doing is very smart and it doesn’t mean he is giving up.
                He shows he learned the lessons so many other Jews in Europe did not learn until it was too late.


                         Jules
                          September 24, 2012 at 1:07 am

                        And I think you are right.
                           WSI is getting his loved ones out of The Big Apple most likely.

              Reply

          o      cobra
                 September 21, 2012 at 1:28 am

              o It’s not over ’till it’over. Obama knows his hand is weak and he counts for Romney to blow it.Which he does
                  his best to do…
                  Re. Libya I think it is a combination of a destabilizing game to the benefit of Iqwan-The mooooslim bros
                  and naked incompetence and leftist stupidity at the State dept. and the WH.
                  The battle is not over yet. October will be crucial, with many surprises in store. The patriots are not giving
                  Just my two cents.


                            bill o'rights
                             September 21, 2012 at 2:18 pm

                           Absolutely agree.
                              And, we are Americans. We do not yield. We do not give up. We keep fighting until every last
                              breathe is gone.

                              Mostly, we love our freedom.

                              The rest of the world may believe that wealthy Americans value their wealth above all else. But, if
                              that is the case, they’d be wrong, DEAD WRONG.

                              More than anything else, Americans value their freedom.

          o       Reply


          o      Jaydee
                 September 21, 2012 at 1:41 am

              o I have read elsewhere that the creator of the Mohammed video is a mega Obama donor ($1 million+). Has
                  anyone here seen any proof of that?

                            Ben
                             September 21, 2012 at 2:23 am

                           That was referring to Bill Mahar’s “Religulous,” which took on islam for about 20 minutes in the
                              movie – he donated $1M. It got me at first when it was mentioned too, just due to the proximity of
                              the statements on the movies by a couple people.


          o      charlotte
                 September 21, 2012 at 1:42 am

                  Longtime readers know that I’ve extensively covered the troublesome conflict of interest at the Department
                  of Justice involving Attorney General Eric Holder and his former law firm, Covington and Burling, which
                  has represented a score of Gitmo detainees. See my archive of posts on the matter here. Many readers have
                  asked whether the firm represented Abu Sufian bin Qumu, the former Gitmo detainee released in 2007 —
                  and now named as the possible lead plotter in the bloody attacks on our consulate personnel, staff, and
                  private security contractors in Benghazi.

44.   Reply


          o      Stan Lippmann
                 September 21, 2012 at 3:17 am

              o As David Stockman admitted the other day, Ron Paul was right 30 years ago. It is now 30 years too late. The
                  biggest problems will be similar to what happened after the Soviet Union collapsed and the Commonwealth
                  of Independent States took its place, namely, how to secure the nuclear arsenal. For the individual, if you
                  don’t have physical gold or silver, you will have no money after German-style hyperinflation. On the bright
                  side, my student loan from law school will be wiped out. And if you have a mortgage on a house, you get a
                  free place to live. And all debt will be wiped out generally, so the news is not all bad, because we cannot
                  start to rebuild until all the debt is wiped out. It will also wipe out Social Security and the rest of the Nazi
                  BS that FDR sold our souls to the bankers for when we went bankrupt in 1933, 20 years after Wilson sold us
                  to the fed. Actually, Andrew Jackson could see this all coming in 1830, so in a sense, if you just open your
                  eyes, you could see this all coming since that bastard Hamilton corrupted the spirit of the 1648 pine tree
                  shilling revolution based on silver as common money. That’s what the revolution was and is still all about.
                  Those disgusting Roman Brits are the ones who deserved to be destroyed if anyone does. They are still
                  hanging on by the thread of our lingua franca, but as soon as the rest of the world stops being in awe of
                  things English, Western hegemony will suddenly end. The United States Government has been corrupt and
                  counter-revolutionary since 1789. The only way for Americans to prosper in the future is to become a
                  Commonwealth of Independent States after the Soviet Style collapse long overdue, sound familiar? Would
                  that lead to a Apple/Potato War between Washington State and Idaho? Perhaps in another hundred years, but
                  I’m not going to be around that long, so I’d say it’s the patriotic duty of every American to boycott the Feds
                  in every conceivable way, vote with your feet like the Old Man if you are able.


                           bill o'rights
                            September 21, 2012 at 2:26 pm

                          Well put!
                             And, what is it with all the retarded anglophilia we see? The Brits apparently love their decadent,
                             taxpayer-funded royalty and too many of us over here do too.

          o      Reply


          o      charlotte
                 September 21, 2012 at 3:24 am

                  All about the Munis WHI was talking about

47.   Reply


          o      charlotte
                 September 21, 2012 at 3:54 am

                  Munis — bonds sold by states, cities, counties and other localities to finance government operations — are
                  in trouble because the Ponzi scheme of Big Government is coming unglued. The markets are merely
                  reflecting this reality, as they always do.
                  The $3 trillion muni market was once regarded as the safest of all investments because the bonds are backed
                  by government taxes. Now it’s showing all the earmarks of the 2007-08 meltdown
49.   Reply


                           BigTexas
                            September 22, 2012 at 3:21 am

                          Very bad news. The unions and the environmental lobby and both Dems and Republicans let all
                             this go down. And then the ones who want it to happen are getting ready to pounce IMO.


          o      ThroughtheLookingGlass
                 September 21, 2012 at 4:58 am

              o Scarlett O’Hara…Butler: “Oh, Rhett. Where shall I go? What shall I do?”
                  Rhett Butler: “Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a damn.”

                  later… Scarlett O’Hara: “I’ll think about that tomorrow. After all, tomorrow IS another day!”
                  I’ve already stated my thoughts on what went wrong in Libya. Stevens was set up…walked right into a trap.
                  He was silenced. Al Qaeda/Muslim Brotherhood/Barry Socialist-oetoro-blamo/State Department: 1;
                  American People/Israel: 0

51.   Reply


          o      sartana
                 September 21, 2012 at 5:29 am

              o As soon as I saw the video of Stevens being dragged by the toothless mob, I knew his murder had been
                  ordered by the White House. The similarity to the videotaped murder of Kadaffy is just too much.
                  It should be noted that one of the ex-SEALS, Glen Doherty, was one of the Special Forces that took the kill
                  shots on the Somali Pirates back in ’09. Remember that the White House had ordered restraint on the
                  sharpshooters, which led to a several days stand-off until the men on the scene took their own initiative and
                  ended it. People at the time on various blogs I read joked that those OPs had better watch their backs for
                  having crossed Obama.

53.   Reply


                            rosie
                             September 21, 2012 at 7:39 pm

                           Wonder if Stevens’ family asked for a medical examination of his body.


          o      Watcher
                 September 21, 2012 at 7:09 am

              o Face it people – WSI understands – we are now faced with war from Arab states the likes that will make 9/11
                  look like the 4th of July.

                  Obama has set up the Muslim Brotherhood to begin the new caliphate and attack Israel. He could care no
                  less. Israel PM asks to meet him and he is too busy appearing on Letterman.

                  Israel will attack alone as they always have, but they can not do the job alone.
                  Once they attack, all of the Arab states will attack in retaliation – they have already stated that if attacked by
                  Israel they will also attack us. What will Obama do .. he will bow, curtsey and disavow Israel but he will
                  never defend us by attacking any Muslim country in turn.

                  Should Romney win, and I believe that he will, Obama will feed us to the wolves before he leaves office as
                  a parting gesture. He has a Narcissistic Personality Disorder and will feel betrayed that he was not re-
                  elected. He will lash out at us for not supporting him and make us suffer for it one way or another.

                  WSI is doing what he has to do to ensure his survival. Can’t say as I blame him. I wish him and all of you
                  the best of luck in the days ahead.

                  May god bless America, though I think we are going to feel the wrath of god for turning our back on him
                  before we feel his forgiveness. And that is what WSI was saying.

55.   Reply

          o      Redwine
                 September 21, 2012 at 8:05 am

              o Glenn Beck has stated the CIA angle on the Benghazi assassinations on his TV and radio programs. He has
                  some undisclosed insider information.


          o      thatsitivehadenough
                 September 21, 2012 at 9:28 am

              o UM, show this video to WHI, and WSI, and anyone else, and see what they make of the evidence in it that
                  Obama & the media are part of a joint, large effort to INDOCTRINATE the American people to
                  collectivism (communism). I want to hear what he has to say about this:


          o      CeeJay
                 September 21, 2012 at 12:08 pm

              o Ali Baby
                  “…In stating that, is it not interesting Obama is not demanding the FBI investigate the Stevens anal rape
                  murder, while Libya shuts them out, and Ambassador Rice lies to the public as if the FIB……I mean FBI is
                  investigating all of this.
                  Sort of like when Vladamir Putin assassinated thee entire Polish Patriot Government, and Barack Obama
                  never raised a word about sending the FBI or FAA.

                  It all seems as if Obama already knows exactly who the murderers are of Chris Stevens and that crew, and
                  he just has no interest in any one else knowing what he knows.

                  Just how much danger is Barry Chin in with the Muslims he plays or those he has had murdered? It is
                  obvious that Obama’s Muslims murder people, including their own leaders. It is obvious that they use rape
                  to get the Obama message across. It is now obvious that they blackmail B. Hussein, as the Libyans are
                  doing, in they know who carried out the attacks, the job was inside as the Obama terrorists had the addresses
                  to safe houses, and yes, it is the fact in this that Obama does not call for hunting these terrorists down.
                   Ah Lame Cherry exclusive here, did you not notice that Obama has been quite silent as has everyone not
                   vowing to track these terrorists down for justice?…”

                   Just take the time to read Lame Cherry. You would ALREADY know what’s up w/all of this!

59.   Reply


          o       Jules
                  September 21, 2012 at 12:16 pm

              o The Washington Examiner has a paper, Obama You Don’t Know. Chapter IX is the Arab-American Network
                   behind Obama.

61.   Reply


          o       CeeJay
                  September 21, 2012 at 12:16 pm

              o This is part of what I think both the Insiders are trying to tell us:
                   Obama Seal

                   “What is the point really in the reality of free elections in America have been wiped out by Barack Hussein
                   Obama and his Scytl Hewlett Packard seditionists of the global order….”

63.   Reply


                            USA4ever
                             September 21, 2012 at 1:39 pm


                                     AtlasShrugged
                                      September 21, 2012 at 11:02 pm

                                    The founder of scytl died at the age of 35 in a single car accident… not even mentioned
                                       in the web site’s archives. Guess that isn’t at all weird.

                                       People, do your own research instead of automatically responding with some pundit’s
                                       article that doesn’t give you the complete picture.

                          Reply


                                                 USA4ever
                                                  September 22, 2012 at 9:14 am

                                                Don’t come in here with your passive-aggressive nonsense.
                                                   Your response to Malkin’s take is to cite a car accident? We’re supposed to
                                                   accept that a car accident automatically guarantees vote fraud and that anyone
                                                   who doesn’t hop aboard the paranoia train with you is a flippant and faulty

                                                   You cannot be serious.

                                      Reply


          o      Obeline
                 September 21, 2012 at 1:36 pm

              o Unquestionably, these are dangerous and frightening times.
                  Quality of life is not negotiable.

                  We must find solutions – and it all starts with strong minds and spirits.

                  ‘Give me liberty or give me death’ may ring as true today as it did when Patrick Henry said it in 1775.

65.   Reply

          o      Vyxen
                 September 21, 2012 at 3:24 pm

              o Not sure if anyone has mentioned this, but the State Department has stonewalled on the Benghazi attack.Will
                  not talk about it. Interesting that the media does not have a problem with this.


          o      Dan Shays

                 September 22, 2012 at 5:47 am
              o “Semper Fi motherf-cker.
                  …I don’t quit.”

                  James Carville was a Marine, wasn’t he?

68.   Reply


                            Jules
                             September 22, 2012 at 7:56 pm

                           [finger to lips} Ssssssssh..


                            bill o'rights
                             September 22, 2012 at 11:22 pm

                           LOL…

              o       Reply


              o      AquaStar
                     September 22, 2012 at 7:34 pm

                  o This was like watching a riveting and compelling movie only to have the ending fall completely apart.
                      I hope this is a head fake from the Insider because it was definitely a downer.

    70.   Reply


              o      Diane Wright
                     September 24, 2012 at 7:35 pm

                  o 1st.of all “Thank You WHI”, for making the TIME to do this interview.It couldn’t have been an easy
                      task,given the current circumstances.
                      For any interested,in knowing the true state of our economy,and weather it is to far gone or not,”FOLLOW
                      THE MONEY”.(the real money)

                      When BIG MEN,start selling off BIG AMOUNTS their digital NET WORTH,,,FOR real VALUE,you
                      should ask your selves,,,, WHY….

                      You could watch the Markets, but the wealthy can manipulate those. Watch WHAT they do, with their