clare
Document Sample


MGT659-91
Intro. to Personal Case
Analysis
Michael L. Bejtlich
Lecture #Objectives:
Review the requirements of the
personal case analysis
Trace a hypothetical personal
problem which makes use of this
model
The Harvard Case Study
Method:
See your Course Description and
look for:
–Explanation of Personal Case
Analysis
–Modified Harvard Case Study
Guide
–Evaluation Sheet
Example of solving a
personal problem using The
Method:
Hypothetical student Claire
Strengths:
Highly motivated to succeed in
school
Good verbal aptitude
Has some business work
experience
Enjoys school projects when
working with others
Is considered to be friendly and
outgoing
Weaknesses:
Often takes on too many projects
Shaky performance in courses
involving math
Unsure of the training program
requirements
Dislikes studying and other “desk
work” when alone
Is sometimes perceived as overly
talkative
Opportunities:
Potential entrance to retail training
program
Participate on the college debating
team
Can pick up more hours at work, since a
co-worker has quit
Is considering arranging tutoring in
CASA
Has just saved enough for a down
payment on a new car
Threats:
Aware that the retail training
program is becoming more
competitive
Purchasing the new car will require
extra work
The debating club could drain her
time
Changes in the financial aid laws
might require her to work more
Claire’s Mission (Long-
Term Goal) Statement:
To successfully complete her
Associates of Science degree in
the Fashion/Retail
Management Program and find
employment in a retail
management training program
in the northeast region
Claire’s Problem
Statement:
How do I best structure my
schedule this term in order
to achieve my long-term
goals?
Claire’s Alternative Solutions:
Reduce her work hours and concentrate
on her school work
Increase work hours and purchase the
new car
Arrange tutoring and attend the math
lab
Try to do everything (purchase car, join
debating club, etc.) and see what
happens
Request an interview with training
Claire’s Selected
Criterion:
Feasibility
Effectiveness
Cost
Risks
Time
Claire’s Criterion
Chart:
Chart with factors weighted
the same
Chart with (1) factor
weighted differently
CLAIRE’S CRITERION CHART ANALYSIS (EQUAL
WEIGHTS)
FEAS. EFFECT. COST RISKS TIME TTL
SCHOOL 4 3 5 4 3 19
NEW CAR 5 2 1 2 4 14
TUTORING 5 3 5 4 4 21
EVERYTHING! 1 1 1 1 1 5
INTERVIEW 3 3 5 4 4 19
COMBO. 1,3,5, 4 5 5 5 2 21
LEGEND: 1=LOWEST, 5=HIGHEST DEGREE OF DESIRABILITY
CLAIRE’S CRITERION CHART ANALYSIS
(EFFECTIVENESS FACTOR AT 150% WEIGHT)
FEAS. EFFECT. COST RISKS TIME TTL
SCHOOL 4 4.5 5 4 3 20.5
NEW CAR 5 3.0 1 2 4 15.0
TUTORING 5 4.5 5 4 4 22.5
EVERYTHING! 1 1.5 1 1 1 5.5
INTERVIEW 3 4.5 5 4 4 20.5
COMBO. 1,3,5, 4 7.5 5 5 2 23.5
LEGEND: 1=LOWEST, 5=HIGHEST DEGREE OF DESIRABILITY
Claire’s Best Solution:
Discuss all solutions against all
criterion
Specifically discuss the use of
her final criterion chart scores
Combination solution appears
to be the best, particularly if
effectiveness is 150%
weighted
Claire’s Implementation:
Explain how best solution will go into
action
How will risks be averted? e.g. time
management issues
Drawbacks minimized? e.g. rewards if
she studies according to her schedule
Claire will discuss exactly how and
when solutions 1,3 and 5 will be put
into action in very specific terms
Claire’s Feedback:
Who will she receive feedback
from?
On what basis will the feedback be
received?
She might include teachers,
advisors, her manager, family
members, friends, etc.
Be specific
What to Skip:
No extra charts required (Step 9)
No outside research required (Step
10)
Evaluation Tips:
Focus on clarity
Focus on the process
Review your finished product and
make sure it makes sense
Lecture Objectives:
Reviewed the requirements of the
personal case analysis due in Week
6
Traced a hypothetical personal
problem which makes use of this
model
Get documents about "