Is martial law the ultimate goal?

							         Is martial law the ultimate goal?
Daniel Detwiler
teapartyorg.ning.com
February 1, 2013




With everything happening to this country of ours it is getting harder and harder to maintain a cool
head and not jump to conclusions but if we sit back and view the last four years as well as what’s
happening now an image is starting to appear of what might possibly be our future.
During President Obama’s first term he laid the ground work.
President Obama issued over 144 executive orders, many dealing
with martial law. As the Supreme Court already opinioned when
looking at President Lincolns use of martial law, “Martial law …
destroys every guarantee of the Constitution.”. This means when
martial law is declared we as Americans have no rights at all.
During President Obama’s first term he wrote Executive Orders
granting the government the power to take over all communications
media, electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals. He also
wrote an Executive Order where the government can take over all
modes of transportation and control of the highways and sea ports.
That means Obama can confiscate your horse, your donkeys, your
bicycle or even your riding lawn mower. All forms of transportation.
Executive orders signed by Obama also include railroads, inland
water ways, public storage facilities, airports and airplanes including
commercial planes can all be taken over by the government.
Think that’s bad, well it gets worse, much worse.
Executive Orders have also been signed allowing the government to
mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.
To take over all health
education and welfare
functions. To allow the
Housing and Finance Authority
to relocate and establish new
locations for populations, AND
grants authority to the
Department of Justice to
enforce the plans set out in
Executive Orders, to institute
Industrial support, to establish
judicial and legislative liaison,
to control all aliens, to operate
penal and correctional
institutions, and to advise and
assist the President.
If that doesn’t scare you then
look at this. An Executive order
has also been signed which
allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the
mechanisms of production and distribution of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit, and the flow of
money in U.S. financial institutions in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when the
president declares a state of emergency, Congress cannot review the action for six months.
Now why that last part that congress cannot review the action for six months? To understand why
President Obama wanted that executive order lets look at what martial law is. Martial law is the
suspension of civil authority and the imposition of military authority. When we say a region or country
is “under martial law,” we mean to say that the military is in control of the area, that it acts as the
police, as the courts, as the legislature. The president is the commander in chief of the military and as
such in full control of the martial law. Seeing how the constitution is suspended during martial law and
the President is in control the only ones able to stop martial law is the congress. In effect that Executive
order that says Congress cannot review the action for six months in effect give the President full
unchallenged control for six months.
A little tidbit to add to martial law here is that our constitution Article 1, Section 9 states, “The
privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or
Invasion the public Safety may require it.” The concept of the of Habeas Corpus is that a person may
not be held by the government without a valid reason for being held. A writ means the government
would have to provide a person to a court to show just reason for holding them. With the suspension of
the writ the government can detain and hold a person indefinitely.
In a nut shell a President can declare martial law, would have six months of free reign to do as he
pleases while rounding up any congressional opposition to his martial law and detaining them
indefinitely and doing this totally legally.
In order for a president to declare martial law he must have a valid reason to do so. For that lets look at
our present situation. Today we have a president whom has openly declared war on the second
amendment to our constitution. This is causing a great deal of civil unrest in the nation. Being told that
their actions are unconstitutional doesn’t slow the President down at all, in fact it emboldens him to
push even harder. To top that off our President is also pushing us to the fiscal cliff of ruin. When asked
about the out of control spending our President replies that we do not have a spending problem. Top
that off with our government printing money as fast as possible as well as demanding unrestricted
borrowing powers we can see we will be heading to a financial meltdown very soon. A financial
meltdown coupled with civil unrest over constitutional violations would be the catalyst for open revolt
and exactly what would be needed in order to openly declare martial law. Then we all are doomed.




                    http://www.infowars.com/