Docstoc

HOMEWORK

Document Sample
HOMEWORK Powered By Docstoc
					                       Homerwork Chapter 5, 6 and 7
1. Which of the following statements is CORRECT?
a. The internal rate of return method (IRR) is generally regarded by academics as being the best
single method for evaluating capital budgeting projects.
b. The payback method is generally regarded by academics as being the best single method for
evaluating capital budgeting projects.
c. The discounted payback method is generally regarded by academics as being the best single
method for evaluating capital budgeting projects.
d. The net present value method (NPV) is generally regarded by academics as being the best
single method for evaluating capital budgeting projects.
e. The modified internal rate of return method (MIRR) is generally regarded by academics as
being the best single method for evaluating capital budgeting projects.

2. Projects A and B have identical expected lives and identical initial cash outflows (costs).
However, most of one project’s cash flows come in the early years, while most of the other
project’s cash flows occur in the later years. The two NPV profiles are given below:
Which of the following statements is CORRECT?
a. More of Project A’s cash flows occur in the later years.
b. More of Project B’s cash flows occur in the later years.
c. We must have information on the cost of capital in order to determine which project has the
larger early cash flows.
d. The NPV profile graph is inconsistent with the statement made in the problem.
e. The crossover rate, i.e., the rate at which Projects A and B have the same NPV, is greater than
either project’s IRR.

3. Suppose a firm relies exclusively on the payback method when making capital budgeting
decisions, and it sets a 4-year payback regardless of economic conditions. Other things held
constant, which of the following statements is most likely to be true?
a. It will accept too many short-term projects and reject too many long-term projects (as judged by
the NPV).
b. It will accept too many long-term projects and reject too many short-term projects (as judged by
the NPV).
c. The firm will accept too many projects in all economic states because a 4-year payback is too
low.
d. The firm will accept too few projects in all economic states because a 4-year payback is too
high.
e. If the 4-year payback results in accepting just the right set of projects under average economic
conditions, then this payback will result in too few long-term projects when the economy is weak.

4. You are on the staff of Camden Inc. The CFO believes project acceptance should be based on
the NPV, but Steve Camden, the president, insists that no project should be accepted unless its
IRR exceeds the project’s risk-adjusted WACC. Now you must make a recommendation on a
project that has a cost of $15,000 and two cash flows: $110,000 at the end of Year 1 and -
$100,000 at the end of Year 2. The president and the CFO both agree that the appropriate
WACC for this project is 10%. At 10%, the NPV is $2,355.37, but you find two IRRs, one at 6.33%
and one at 527%, and a MIRR of 11.32%. Which of the following statements best describes your
optimal recommendation, i.e., the analysis and recommendation that is best for the company and
least likely to get you in trouble with either the CFO or the president?
a. You should recommend that the project be rejected because its NPV is negative and its IRR is
less than the WACC.
b. You should recommend that the project be rejected because, although its NPV is positive, it
has an IRR that is less than the WACC.
c. You should recommend that the project be accepted because (1) its NPV is positive and (2)
although it has two IRRs, in this case it would be better to focus on the MIRR, which exceeds the
WACC. You should explain this to the president and tell him that the firm’s value will increase if
the project is accepted.
d. You should recommend that the project be rejected. Although its NPV is positive it has two
IRRs, one of which is less than the WACC, which indicates that the firm’s value will decline if the
project is accepted.
e. You should recommend that the project be rejected because, although its NPV is positive, its
MIRR is less than the WACC, and that indicates that the firm’s value will decline if it is accepted.

5. A firm is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are
mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO wants to use the IRR criterion,
while the CFO favors the NPV method. You were hired to advise the firm on the best procedure.
If the wrong decision criterion is used, how much potential value would the firm lose?
WACC: 6.00%
Year 0 1 2 3 4
CFS -$1,025 $380 $380 $380 $380
CFL -$2,150 $765 $765 $765 $765
a. $188.68
b. $198.61
c. $209.07
d. $219.52
e. $230.49

6. Which of the following statements is CORRECT?
a. An externality is a situation where a project would have an adverse effect on some other part of
the firm’s overall operations. If the project would have a favorable effect on other operations, then
this is not an externality.
b. An example of an externality is a situation where a bank opens a new office, and that new
office causes deposits in the bank’s other offices to decline.
c. The NPV method automatically deals correctly with externalities, even if the externalities are
not specifically identified, but the IRR method does not. This is another reason to favor the NPV.
d. Both the NPV and IRR methods deal correctly with externalities, even if the externalities are
not specifically identified. However, the payback method does not.
e. Identifying an externality can never lead to an increase in the calculated NPV.

7. Taussig Technologies is considering two potential projects, X and Y. In assessing the projects’
risks, the company estimated the beta of each project versus both the company’s other assets
and the stock market, and it also conducted thorough scenario and simulation analyses. This
research produced the following data:
Project X Project Y
Expected NPV $350,000 $350,000
Standard deviation (σNPV) $100,000 $150,000
Project beta (vs. market) 1.4 0.8
Correlation of the project cash flows with cash flows from currently existing projects. Cash flows
are not correlated with the cash flows from existing projects. Cash flows are highly correlated with
the cash flows from existing projects.
Which of the following statements is CORRECT?
a. Project X has more stand-alone risk than Project Y.
b. Project X has more corporate (or within-firm) risk than Project Y.
c. Project X has more market risk than Project Y.
d. Project X has the same level of corporate risk as Project Y.
e. Project X has less market risk than Project Y.
8. Which of the following statements is CORRECT?
a. If an asset is sold for less than its book value at the end of a project’s life, it will generate a loss
for the firm, hence its terminal cash flow will be negative.
b. Only incremental cash flows are relevant in project analysis, the proper incremental cash flows are the
reported accounting profits, and thus reported accounting income should be used as the basis for investor
and managerial decisions.
c. It is unrealistic to believe that any increases in net working capital required at the start of an
expansion project can be recovered at the project’s completion. Working capital like inventory is
almost always used up in operations. Thus, cash flows associated with working capital should be
included only at the start of a project’s life.
d. If equipment is expected to be sold for more than its book value at the end of a project’s life,
this will result in a profit. In this case, despite taxes on the profit, the end-of-project cash flow will
be greater than if the asset had been sold at book value, other things held constant.
e. Changes in net working capital refer to changes in current assets and current liabilities, not to
changes in long-term assets and liabilities. Therefore, changes in net working capital should not
be considered in a capital budgeting analysis.

9. Temple Corp. is considering a new project whose data are shown below. The equipment that
would be used has a 3-year tax life, would be depreciated by the straight-line method over its 3-
year life, and would have a zero salvage value. No new working capital would be required.
Revenues and other operating costs are expected to be constant over the project’s 3-year life.
What is the project’s NPV?
Risk-adjusted WACC 10.0%
Net investment cost (depreciable basis) $65,000
Straight-line deprec. rate 33.3333%
Sales revenues, each year $65,500
Operating costs (excl. deprec.), each year $25,000
Tax rate 35.0%
a. $15,740
b. $16,569
c. $17,441
d. $18,359
e. $19,325

10. Florida Car Wash is considering a new project whose data are shown below. The equipment
to be used has a 3-year tax life, would be depreciated on a straight-line basis over the project’s 3-
year life, and would have a zero salvage value after Year 3. No new working capital would be
required. Revenues and other operating costs will be constant over the project’s life, and this is
just one of the firm’s many projects, so any losses on it can be used to offset profits in other units.
If the number of cars washed declined by 40% from the expected level, by how much would the
project’s NPV decline? (Hint: Note that cash flows are constant at the Year 1 level, whatever that
level is.)
WACC 10.0%
Net investment cost (depreciable basis) $60,000
Number of cars washed 2,800
Average price per car $25.00
Fixed op. cost (excl. deprec.) $10,000
Variable op. cost/unit (i.e., VC per car washed) $5.375
Annual depreciation $20,000
Tax rate 35.0%

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:140
posted:1/17/2013
language:English
pages:3