Weighted Average Cost of Capital_1_

Reviews
Shared by: vixycn
Stats
views:
24
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
10/29/2009
language:
ENGLISH
pages:
0
Weighted Average Cost of Capital And equivalent approaches Exam quickie A corporation is near bankruptcy. Why do the managers invest in bad risks? Answer on bad risks  Managers represent equity … at least they are supposed to.  Risk gives them a chance to pull out of bankruptcy. Equity gets the gain.  A bad outcome leaves them still bankrupt. Debt suffers the loss. Capital Budgeting for the Levered Firm  Adjusted Present Value  Flows to Equity of Capital  Weighted Average Cost  APV Example Reading note  Skip sections 17.5  Pages 444-451. through 17.8. Adjusted-Present-Value (APV)  NPV for an unlevered firm  NPVF = net present value of financing  APV = NPV + NPVF Unlevered NPV  Unlevered cash flows = CF from operations - Capital Spending - Added NWC - corporate taxes for unlevered firm.  Discount rate: r0  PVUCF: PV of unlevered cash flows  NPV = PVUCF - Initial investment Net present value of financing side effects  PV of Tax Subsidy to Debt  Costs of Issuing New Securities  The Costs of Financial Distress  Subsidies to Debt Financing Flow-to-Equity (FTE)  LCF = UCF - (1 - TC) x rB x B  PVLCF = Present value of LCF  FTE = PVLCF - Portion of initial investment from equity  Required return on levered equity (rS)  rS = r0 + B/SL x (1 - TC) x (r0 - rB) Weighted-Average-Cost-ofCapital  Discount rate: rWACC  PVUCF: PV of Unlevered Cash Flows  Value = PVUCF - Initial investment for entire project Summary: APV, FTE, and WACC APV Initial Investment Cash Flows Discount Rates PV of financing All UCF r0 Yes WACC All UCF rWACC No FTE Equity Portion LCF rS No Which is best? Use WACC and FTE when the debt ratio is constant Use APV when the level of debt is known. Example p. 437: Project  Cash inflows  Cash costs  Operating income  Corporate tax  Unlevered cash flow  Cost of 500 360 140 47.6 92.4 project 475 APV  Physical asset of project is discounted at .2.  NPV = 92.4/.2 - 475 = 462 - 475 = -13  Bond financing of 126.2295  rB = .1  NPVF = TC x B = 42.918  APV = -13 + 42.918 = 29.918 APV recap  Value = 475 + 29.918 = 504.198  Debt = - 126.2295  Equity = 378.6985  Debt/Equity = 1/3  Debt/(Debt + Equity) = 1/4 Flow to Equity  Cash inflows 500  Cash costs - 360  Interest - 12.62295  Income after interest 127.37705  Corporate tax - 43.3082  Levered cash flow 84.06885 FTE (continued)  Cost  Borrowing  Cost to equity 475 - 126.2295 348.7705 FTE: Required return on equity  rS =r0 +(B/S)(1-TC)(r0-rB)  B/S = 1/3  rS = .2 +(1/3)(.66)(.2-.1) = .22... FTE valuation  NPV =  - 348.7705 + 84.06885/.22…  = 29.918  Same as in APV method.  Now, same thing with WACC. Find rWACC  rWACC = (S/(S+B))rS+(B/(B+S))(1-TC)rB  =(3/4)(.22…) + (1/4)(.66)(.1)  = .1831666... WACC method continued  NPV =  -475 + 92.4/.183166…  = 29.918.  All methods give the same thing. Example: Start-up, all debt financed.  Cost of project = 30  CF of project 10 before tax, 6.6 after.  Discount rate for an all equity firm .2.  NPV = 6.6/.2 - 30 = 3 More APV example  Tax shield from borrowing 30 at rB=.1 = .1(30).34 = 1.02.  Discounted value = NPVF = 10.2.  APV = 3 + 10.2 = 13.2. Leverage of the start-up  Not 100%.  Value is 30 + 13.2.  B = 30, S = 13.2  S/(B+S) = .305555555  (can’t expect a round number here) Example continued. Do it again  Another project, same as  Retain debt-equity ratio. before.  rWACC = (S/(B+S))rS + (B/(B+S))rB(1-TC)  rWACC = .30555555rS +.694444 rB (.66)  rS=r0 +(B/S)(1-TC)(r0-rB)  rWACC= .15277777 Value, using rWACC  NPV = -30 + 6.6/.1527777  =13.2  Lesson: WACC works when the debt equity ratio is established before the project and retained thereafter.  APV works when the project changes the debt equity ratio Exam quickie  Complete the following statement and explain briefly: nothing matters in finance except __________ and _________. Answer: taxes and bankruptcy  Explanation. Because of homemade leverage, capital structure doesn’t matter in the absence of taxes and bankruptcy.  Taxes matter because debt generates tax shields.  Bankruptcy matters because financial distress damages the assets of the firm.

Related docs
Weighted Average Cost of Capital
Views: 56  |  Downloads: 6
The Weighted Average Cost of Capital
Views: 39  |  Downloads: 0
Cost of Capital_1_
Views: 31  |  Downloads: 0
Weighted Average Cost of Capital
Views: 151  |  Downloads: 8
Weighted Average Cost of Capital
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
Weighted Average Cost of Capital_3_
Views: 59  |  Downloads: 3
Weighted average cost of capital
Views: 242  |  Downloads: 6
Weighted average cost of capital _WACC_
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Weighted Average Cost of Capital_2_
Views: 19  |  Downloads: 3
The Cost of Capital_1_
Views: 26  |  Downloads: 1
Cost of Capital_1_
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
premium docs
Other docs by vixycn
Yamakawa Trading Co
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
WV Potomac Water Quality Trading
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
World trade(72)
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
WORLD TRADE(71)
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
WORLD TRADE(69)
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
WORLD TRADE(68)
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
WORLD TRADE(67)
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
WORLD TRADE(66)
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
WORLD TRADE(65)
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0