1/ 7/ 13 ot l n H m ai Pr i t M essage IPCC Ref: 2012/015407 West Yorkshire Police Authority From: Felicity Stewart-Smith (email@example.com) Sent: 03 January 2013 15:08:19 To: firstname.lastname@example.org 1 attachment uPSD Volume 1 Issue 12.pdf (1653.2 KB) Dear Ms Glass Having read the minutes of last year's Commission meetings it is now apparent that all conduct complaints concerning Chief Officers are personally overseen by you. This will, presumably, involve the above complaint as, for reasons best known to themselves, WYPA added T/CC John Parkinson and T/ACC Ingrid Lee. It is my belief neither of those officers had anything to do with the matters complained about at all. The purpose of this communication is to ask why, if you have this oversight role, you allow WYPA to flagrantly breach IPCC's own Statutory Guidance at almost every step? The essence of my issues with WYPA are repeated with another complaint about T/CC Parkinson concerning deceiving the press. These were both covered in the attached uPSD Newsletter. Please explain to me precisely, promptly and in plain language, why you allow police forces and other appropriate authorities to behave in this manner. Also, I require an update to my complaint, name of investigator and terms of reference to which I am properly entitled under the Statutory Guidance, and a further explanation as to why the person investigating it (or yourself) has not been in touch since the matter was returned by the IPCC to WYPA on 5th October. Yours sincerely Felicity Stewart-Smith 1 li .v l n / d ht t ps: / / col 13. m ai l e. com / m ai Pr i t M essages. aspx?cpi s=668d84d6- 55b7- 11e2- 9af 1- 00215aa4e… 1/ 1
"Glass IPCC email"