Merry Christmas and Happy Gun Control, Chicago

							Merry Christmas and Happy Gun Control,
Chicago
Karen De Coster
The LRC Blog
December 30, 2012
Chicago, one of America’s most
Nazified, anti-gun cities, has just
recorded its 500th homicide. This
is another banner year for Rahm
Emanuel’s tightly controlled non-
gun “paradise.” Breitbart recently
reported that Chicago’s own stats
show that 440 school age children
were shot in 2012 in Chicago’s
paradise. Breitbart’s Awr Hawkins
writes:
These numbers are well above
those for the 2011-2012 school
year, in which 319 Chicago
students were wounded and
another 24 were killed.

And yet, it has long been reported
that the school where Rahm’s
children attend to their education
has an armed security guard.
Additionally, his children also
have an armed escort to get them
to and from school, just like those
Hollywood celebrities who
clamor for gun control while they
enjoy full-time, armed bodyguards. And yet, the citizen gun control puppets continue to lap up the
“wisdom” of their Masters and spew their hyper-emotional pleas to be controlled and enslaved.
Oh – and what appeared in the Chicago Tribune just a few days ago? An article by Laura Washington,
written in the usual Oprahified manner, stating that gun control would be the best present ever for those
of us who lack Chicago’s glorious standards for paradise. In fact, Miss Laura openly calls for
totalitarian decrees on the part of the Napoleonic branch of government:
      Obama can do more. He can issue executive orders that will bypass the congressional
      sausage makers. He can deploy his White House bully pulpit to back similar state and local
      efforts.

      If we don’t take action for the little angels of Sandy Hook, now, America will be forever
      haunted by the demons of gun violence.
In addition, Miss Laura also states that:
      During the 2012 campaign, he avoided confrontations on gun control. When Obama was
      asked about gun control at a presidential debate, he punted. He was terrified of the People
      of the Gun, particularly in election swing states like Pennsylvania and Virginia.

People of the Gun? How cutesy. Actually, Obama and Rahm Emanuel both quickly realized, upon
Obamanual’s first election, that they could not win the federal battle for gun control because so many
states of free and law-abiding peoples are still heroically immersed in a gun culture, unlike their murder
city. Like all of us, politicians pick their battles, and after Obamanual realized this battle could not be
won, Emanuel separated from Obama and took his schemes back to the city that gave us both of these
megalomaniac buffoons. Sorry Chicago, better that you have Rahm all to yourselves rather than the rest
of us.
Chicago, feel free to revel in your gun control authoritarianism and ignore your city’s violence, murder,
bloodshed, and perpetual terror, but you aren’t going to import your political enslavement and
perverted twist of logic to the rest of us anytime soon. Follow me on Twitter @karendecoster.
TYRANNY ALERT Obama to Put “Full
Weight” Behind Feinstein Gun
Confiscation Plan
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
December 30, 2012
President Obama went on Meet
the Press Sunday and said he will
put his “full weight” behind
passing new restrictions on the
Second Amendment in 2013.
“I’m going to be putting
forward a package and I’m
going to be putting my full
weight behind it,” he said. “I’m
going to be making an
argument to the American
people about why this is
important and why we have to
do everything we can to make
sure that something like what
happened at Sandy Hook
Elementary does not happen
again.”
During the interview with David
Gregory, Obama focused on
“assault weapons” and high-
capacity magazines. Second
Amendment foes routinely
describe semi-automatic weapons
with cosmetic military features as
assault weapons.
“I’ve been very clear that an
assault rifle ban, banning these high capacity clips, background checks, that there are a set of issues that
I have historically supported and will continue to support,” said Obama.
Obama stressed that he will push legislation within the first year of his second term. “I’d like to get it
done in the first year,” he said. “I will put forward a very specific proposal based on the
recommendations that Joe Biden’s task force is putting together as we speak. And so this is not
something that I will be putting off.”
The president told NBC he believes “responsible gun owners” will agree to the recommendations put
forward by vice president Biden’s task force.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who
promised to enact draconian anti-
Second Amendment legislation
following the Sandy Hook massacre,
said on Sunday America needs to
“bite the bullet” and restrict the gun
rights of Americans.
“America has to bite the bullet of
what these incidents mean to our
people, to our nation and our
nation’s standing in the world,”
Feinstein told Fox News Sunday.
“When you have someone walking
in and slaying in the most
brutal way, 6-year-olds, something
is really wrong.”
Feinstein said the firearms of law-
abiding Americans need to be placed
under “appropriate authority.”

                                           On December 27, we reported that Feinstein is in
                                           favor of passing legislation that would treat
                                           American gun owners as criminals. On her Senate
                                           web page, Feinstein stated her proposed
                                           legislation will add fingerprinting and photo
                                           identification to the National Firearms Act.
                                           The effort to expand firearms registration will
                                           include weapons grandfathered prior to the
                                           enactment of Feinstein’s proposed legislation.
                                           On December 20, New York governor Andrew
                                           Cuomo said the state may confiscate firearms.
                                           “Confiscation could be an option. Mandatory sale
                                           to the state could be an option. Permitting could
                                           be an option — keep your gun but permit it,” the
                                           governor said.


                                           Pres. Obama on Meet the Press: Gun Control
                                           after Connecticut (Dec.30 2012) VIDEO
BELOW
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=du6546rfZ-0

Firearm Confiscation Plan Announced For America VIDEO BELOW
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=KOfEwZOreWs
Piers Morgan to Leave U.S. if Second
Amendment Not Repealed
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
December 29, 2012
                                      On Saturday, CNN host Piers Morgan threatened to deport
                                      himself if the United States government does not roll back the
                                      Second Amendment.
                                      “Although I love the country as a second home and one that has
                                      treated me incredibly well, I would, as a concerned parent first –
                                      and latterly, of a one-year-old daughter who may attend an
                                      American elementary school like Sandy Hook in three years’
                                      time – seriously consider deporting myself,” Morgan wrote for
                                      the Daily Mail, a British publication.
                                      Morgan issued his threat to leave the country after more than a
                                      week of news coverage following a petition posted on the White
                                      House website calling for his deportation. The infowars.com
                                      petition singled out Morgan as an enemy of the Second
                                      Amendment and accused him of using his position as a television
                                      network host to undermine the civil liberties of Americans.
                                      We know it is unlikely Morgan will be deported by the
                                      government. The purpose of our petition was to draw attention to
                                      threats against the Second Amendment following the Sandy
                                      Hook massacre. In the days following the tragedy, the
                                      establishment media and certain anti-Second Amendment figures
                                      in government dominated the discussion. Media coverage of the
                                      petition and its defense of the Second Amendment helped
                                      balance the scales.
                                      Morgan’s Daily Mail article argues that the NRA is somehow an
                                      omniscient force in American politics. In fact, support for the
                                      Constitution and the Bill of Rights represents a powerful force in
                                      American politics that overshadows the NRA, a fact Mr. Morgan
                                      seems incapable of comprehending. Millions of Americans know
                                      that the anti-gun proposals floated by Dianne Feinstein, Charles
                                      Schumer, Michael Bloomberg and other establishment politicians
                                      are gateway measures that will ultimately lead to the virtual
                                      extinction of the Second Amendment.
                                      As Gary North wrote on December 22, the Second Amendment
serves as a powerful symbol for liberty and individual sovereignty.
The existence of the Second Amendment means the American citizen “still has the fundamental marks
of political sovereignty, namely, firearms. His firearms testify to the fact that the central government
does not yet feel sufficiently confident to confiscate his firearms in the name of the central
government’s exclusive monopoly of violence. His firearms testify to the fact that he is still a citizen,
and that he still possesses rights that politicians and bureaucrats cannot legally overturn.”
More than the hunting rifle and shotgun kept for self-defense – which Piers Morgan claims he supports
the ownership of – the so-called assault rifle stands as the symbol of liberty and resistance to an over-
sized and increasingly tyrannical federal government.
In the Daily Mail article, Morgan once again demonstrates that he is a dangerous enemy of the Second
Amendment and all it stands for. “Obama should follow-up by launching a Government buy-back for
all existing assault weapons in circulation (as worked successfully in Los Angeles last week). I would
go further, confiscating the rest and enforcing tough prison sentences on those who still insist on
keeping one,” he writes. No doubt we can expect Morgan to continue his subversion against the lawful
ownership of firearms on his nationally syndicated television show as Congress moves next month to
introduce and ultimately impose draconian legislation on the American people.
Finally, on this Friday past Alex Jones and infowars.com posted a second petition on the White House
website. It calls for the federal government – including the Secret Service and the Pentagon – to disarm
under the mandate of the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990.
“Journalist Alex Jones and Infowars.com are calling for President Barack Obama to issue an executive
order amending the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990,” the petition states. “The executive order will
establish the White House, all federal buildings and federal events as gun free zones and all federal
security personnel will turn in their guns. We also demand the order apply to private schools such as
Sidwell Friends School attended by the president’s daughters. This petition is a response to government
and corporate media dismissing a call for armed guards at schools following the Sandy Hook shooting.
Jones and Infowars.com believe there should not be a double standard. If the government believes gun
free zones are a solution for citizens, the same standard should apply to government servants and
employees.”
We do not expect a response from the Obama administration or for that matter an executive order
disarming the federal government. The petition simply points out the fact government intends to keep
its massive arsenal of weapons – including over a billion recently purchased bullets – and underscore
the fact government as history repeatedly demonstrates poses a deadly threat to citizens, a threat for
more awesome than any number of deranged school shooters.
Sandy Hook: How Television Takes Your
Guns
Jon Rappoport
Infowars.com
December 30, 2012
Somebody has to write about these things. Since I’ve worked as a reporter for 30 years, I know
enough about how the game is rigged.
I’m talking about the big mass tragedies.
Sandy Hook, the Aurora theater, Hurricane
Sandy, Katrina.
Many of the interviews with survivors are
done on the spot, with no prep. But the
biggest interviews are done in a television
studio or a home, by a recognized anchor.
The setting is arranged beforehand and lit
well. A mood and a framework are
established.
The guests are prepped by one of the
producers before they go on-air. This is
where the brainwashing occurs. A potential
conflict needs to be resolved. The network
has its agenda and the guest has his.
The guest is swimming in a welter of
emotions, in the wake of the tragedy. A
family member has died. The environment
of the storm or the murders is still chaotic.
The network wants to “edit” these feelings, to convey something specific.”
The producer says to the guest, “What we want to do here is let our audience know how special your
daughter was. How wonderful a person she was. We realize, of course, that you’re grieving. We
understand and honor that. We do. In this interview, we really want to give you a chance, though, to tell
the world what a special girl she was. Talk about her life, her interests, her hobbies, how she was
thought of by the family and by friends at school. Honor her memory…”
Now, this may be the last thing on the guest’s mind. This grieving mother may be feeling angry,
outraged. She is feeling absolutely desolate. She is feeling lost. Given the opportunity, she would
express these feelings.
But this is not what the network or the anchor wants. The “program” at the moment involves
“reflection on the happy moments of the child’s life.” It’s part of the pre-set storyline.
At this moment, for this grieving mother, the happy moments are the farthest thing from her mind. But
who cares? She just fodder for the network’s agenda.
And if the producer is skillful enough, he can gently convince the mother that she should devote four
minutes of commercially sponsored national television to “a celebration” of her dead child’s life.
                                             Suddenly, it makes sense to the profoundly confused,
                                             profoundly searching mother. Yes. Why not? Why not go
                                             along with the program? She’ll have a video clip about her
                                             wonderful daughter forever. A scrapbook memory.
                                             Under no circumstances, of course, will the producer or
                                             the anchor permit the mother to go on camera and show
                                             outrage and anger. That’s verboten. That cuts too close to
                                             the bone. That doesn’t fit the mandatory sequence of
                                             horror, shock, loss, grief, healing, resolution, celebration of
                                             a life lost.
                                             The whole sequence is artificial. It’s imposed. It’s
                                             orchestrated. It’s a stage play, produced in great part
                                             through interviews with guests who have suffered loss and
                                             who are “real.”
                                             Except they’re not. They’re programmed to deliver what
                                             the networks want.
                                          And behind all this? Behind the mandatory spooled-out
                                          story line, which takes days to reveal in full, on television?
                                          The concealed anomalies and lies and contradictions in the
commission of the crime and the ensuing cover-up.
The network story line hides as much of that as possible.
This is why the interview-prep is so important. Here is where the guests, before they go on camera, are
nudged into the right slot, are shown what to focus on, are brainwashed into doing something they
would never do.
Programming guests is a skill. Networks need people who can do that well. They have them. They pay
them.
Anchor: I understand your daughter liked to make airplane models. Did you think that was unusual?
Mother: Well, at first we did. But she was good at it, and she enjoyed it so much, we became very
enthusiastic about it. My husband introduced her to a buddy of his from the Air Force, and Cindy went
up in a jet.
Anchor (smiling broadly): Really? A jet?
Mother: When she came home, she was overjoyed.
Anchor: Did she want to become a pilot?
Mother (laughing): For a few days. But her love of making models led her to want to be an artist. Our
son is a graphics person. He taught Cindy to make computer pictures of our whole extended family.
(laughing) We have lots of cousins and aunts and uncles. Cindy put their pictures all over the house.
She knew everybody’s names when she was four…
Completely wacko. But that’s what the television audience sees and digests and accepts. And the
anchor moves it right along. A fabricated story. Intercut, of course, with Cindy’s pictures and Cindy
smiling and playing and drawing and sitting at the computer.
And when the dust settles and the mother is being chauffeured home from the interview, her mind
wanders and she begins to think about the revenge she wants to visit on the killer of her daughter. As
many good mothers would. But it’s too late.
She’s already had her four minutes on
television. She feels like a fool, but it’s too
late.
She’ll never get to say to Diane Sawyer,
“You know, Diane, I wish somehow I was
there at the school, and I had a gun, and I
shot that killer dead.”
No, that will never happen.
And mothers across America, who are
feeling that they, too, would have wanted to
be there, in the school, if their child was in
mortal danger, and would have wanted to
have a gun and shoot the killer dead to
protect their child at all costs…those
mothers will be, to a significant degree,
reprogrammed by the Diane Sawyer
interview, and they too will begin thinking
of the happier times and the old days and
the smiles and the laughter.

This is how a handful of television interviews with skillfully prepped guests can make all the difference
in the world. Especially, in the case of Sandy Hook, when gun ownership is now at stake. Do I have to
draw a picture for you? Because, admit it, if you were the father or mother of a child who was
murdered, wouldn’t you have at least a few serious thoughts about revenge? Wouldn’t you? Wouldn’t
you think about the .45 you have in the closet upstairs? Television, though, teaches you what to feel. If
after watching a number of these tragedies play out on television, you are completely reprogrammed
into some grotesque version of “love everybody all the time and forgive everything,” and you need an
outlet, a way to vicariously and subconsciously experience what you REALLY feel, you can always:
                                         Go to the movies. The movies give you a different slant. You can
                                         be Mel Gibson killing people to get his kidnapped daughter
                                         back. You can be Charles Bronson wiping out street scum to
                                         avenge the loss of his wife. You can be Stallone or Arnie. You
                                         can roam the countryside spilling blood at every street corner.
                                         The movies give you vicarious license to destroy evil. Television
                                         news takes it away. It’s called the whipsaw effect, and it’s
                                         modern mind control, and it puts you in the “excluded middle,”
                                         where nothing happens and you remain locked up and passive.
                                         Where the powers-that-be want you to remain.
                                         Have a nice, nice day.



http://www.infowars.com/