MC RPTS POWER PT
Shared by: huanglianjiang1
-
Stats
- views:
- 0
- posted:
- 12/20/2012
- language:
- Unknown
- pages:
- 26
Document Sample


EHP’s and the RPTS
• Mel Cairns MCIEH, Health &Housing
Consultant
• Professional Member of the London RPTS
Panel
3
What is the RPTS?
• Residential Property Tribunal Service
• Sponsored by DCLG
• Part of the judiciary
• Independent expert tribunal
• 3 types of tribunal –
RAC LVT RPT
How is it set up?
• 5 regional Panels
• Case Officer handles each application
• RPT consists of two or three members,
usually a lawyer, a valuer and a
lay/professional member.
Procedure
• Schedule 13 (Housing Act 2004) and The
Residential Property Tribunal Procedure
(England) Regulations 2006
• 49 new jurisdictions covering quality and
use of housing stock and licensing of
certain types of accommodation.
• Over-riding objective is to deal fairly and
justly with applications
Initial Processing of Applications
• Check – jurisdiction
time limits
completeness
• Notify Respondent
• Directions issued
Powers of an RPT
• S.230(2)
General power to give such directions as
are necessary or desirable for securing the
just, expeditious and economical disposal
of the proceedings or any issue raised in
connection with them.
Procedure to hearing
• Hearing details
- 15 week target from date of application
- usually 6-8 weeks in practice
- oral hearing or paper determination
• Decision
- drafted and agreed by RPT
- issued within 2-4 weeks
• Urgent cases
Directions
• Usually specify –
- Dates for submission of statements and
documents
- Types of documents to be provided
- Expert witness requirements
- Preparation of bundle.
• Compliance is essential
The Inspection
• RPT may inspect the premises, any other
premises which will assist and/or the
locality.
• Subject to any necessary consent.
• Parties may usually be present.
• Evidence not usually heard at the
inspection.
The Hearing (1)
• Appeals are “by way of re-hearing”
• Primary duty to assess suitability on day of
hearing.
• RPT can take into account matters of which
the housing authority was not aware.
• In public, unless RPT decides should be in
private
The Hearing (2)
• Informal but structured
• Procedure decided by RPT
• Usually similar to civil court, eg evidence
and cross examination with closing
statements
• Parties may be represented by lawyer,
surveyor or other advocate but often are not
The Hearing (3)
• Expert witness – prior written statement
• Documents – prior disclosure
• Postponement only in certain
circumstances.
The Decision
• Must be in writing
• Sent to all parties
• May be given verbally in the first instance
• May reserve decision on costs
Costs
• Re-imbursement of fee - Regulation 6 of The
Residential Property Tribunal (Fees)(England)
Regulations 2006.
• Re-imbursement of costs in certain
circumstances – Housing Act, Schedule 13,
para.12 – maximum £500.
After the decision
• Decision cannot be revisited
• Right of appeal to Lands Tribunal
• Must seek leave to appeal from RPT
• If refused, can seek leave from LT
• Time limits
• Decisions are published on our web site
and passed to LACORS.
Assistance
• Guidance booklet available
• IF IN DOUBT – ASK! We cannot give advice on
the law or how to conduct your case but we are
always willing to explain our procedures and
process.
On consumer satisfaction surveys, our staff
consistently score highly on approachability and
helpfulness.
• We welcome constructive feedback
Points for Practice
Avoid appeals by :
a) Good/thorough inspections(inc photos)
b) Demonstrating that options have been
considered and explaining reasons for the
choices made.( full statement of reasons)
c) Consistent with concordat and
professional guidance.
24
Before the Hearing
• Comply with directions/time limits
• Checklist/tick boxes
• Prepare good bundle:
-Scott-schedule
- Pagination
- Dividers
25
At the hearing
- Stay calm – less formal than Court!
-Make list of points you want to cover
-Be familiar with bundle
-Proceed through chronology/Scott Schd
26
Contact
• Regional Panels in London,Midlands,
Northern, Southern and Eastern.
• www.RPTS.gov.uk
• Helpline -0845 600 3178
27
Emergency Actions
• Luton Borough Council –v- Universal
Group HA/6/2007
• Munir –v-LB of Wandsworth
LON/OOBJ/HER2009/0002
28
POWERS OF ENTRY
• (1) Evans -v- London Borough of Camden LON/00AG/HIN/2007/0009
• (2) John -v- Cardiff City Council RPT/HA04/HMO/1
• (3) Weinberg -v- Rhondda Cynon Taf County Borough Council
RPT/HA04/S11/IMP7
• (4) Williams -v- Monmouthshire County Council RPT/HA04/S11/IMP8
• (5) Martin Thomas -v- Bristol County Council
• (6) St. John The Baptist College, Oxford -v- Vale of White Horse
District Council
• (7) Cheltenham Construction Ltd. -v- Gloucester County Council
• (8) Angela Clayton -v- Torbay Council
• (9) Mosser-v-Cornwall Council CH1/15LB/HIN/2009/0009
29
Improvement Notices
• Weingreen Ltd. -v- Lichfield District Council
BIR/41UD/HIN/2009/2005
• McGarraghy -v- Rugby Borough Council
BIR/44UD/HIN/2006/0003
• Hanley -v- High Peak Borough Council
BIR/1704/HIN/2009/0007
• Law -v- London Borough of Islington
LON/00AU/HIN/2007/0015
30
Prohibition Orders
• Hanley -v- Tameside Metropolitan Borough
Council MAN/00BT/HIN/2009/0005
• Healy -v- St. Albans City & District Council
CAM/26UG/HPO/2006/0002
31
Get documents about "