Obstructing Justice Statutes by RichardNorland

VIEWS: 16 PAGES: 5

									• Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure

Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure were amended or ... 64 F(1) Time of motion; counteraffidavits ...

83 B Provisional process prohibited in certain ...
www.leg.state.or.us/ors/orcp.html - Cached

• Motion to Avoid Judicial Lien - Labor Law Talk

Does anyone know how to motion the BK court to avoid judicial liens? ...
OSHA Safety Regulations; Alabama Labor Laws ... New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon ...
www.laborlawtalk.com/showthread.php?t=79628 - Cached

• Creditors Rights and Remedies - Docstoc – Documents ...

... B. (§1.2) Brief History of Provisional Process Law in Oregon II. ... 1-2 Affidavit in Support of Motion for
Provisional Process 1 ... 1-8 Claim of Attachment Lien 1-9 Motion for ...


Obstructing Justice Statutes
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/criminal_obstructing_justice_statutes.html


                      Criminal Statutes Repeatedly Violated to
                      Block Exposure of High Level Corruption
Title 18 U.S.C. § 2. Principals. (a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids,
abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal. (b)
Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be
an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.

Note: The legislative intent to punish as a principal not only one who directly commits an offense
and one who "aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures" another to commit an offense,
but also anyone who causes the doing of an act which if done by him directly would render him
guilty of an offense against the United States. Case law decisions: Rothenburg v. United States,
1918, 38 S.Ct. 18, 245 U.S. 480, 62 L.Ed. 414, and United States v. Giles, 1937, 57 S.Ct. 340, 300
U.S. 41, 81 L.Ed. 493.



                                         Title 18 U.S.C. § 3
Title 18 U.S.C. § 3. Accessory after the fact. Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United
States had been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or
prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.

This criminal act was repeatedly perpetrated by federal judges who not only refused to receive the
information about federal crimes that they must receive as part of their administrative duties under
Title 18 U.S.C. § 4 and by their acts that hindered the apprehension and trial of the people
committing the offenses that Stich and his group of other former government agents had discovered
and sought to report.



                                      Title 18 U.S.C. § 4
Title 18 U.S.C. § 4 (misprision of felony). Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of
a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make
known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States,
shall be fined not more than $500 or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

Federal judges repeatedly perpetrated this criminal act by blocking the reporting of the federal
crimes and not making such information known to proper law enforcement personnel.



                                   Title 18 U.S.C. § 1505
Title 18 U.S.C. § 1505. Whoever corruptly ... influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to
influence, obstruct, or impede the due the proper administration of the law under which any
pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States ... shall be
fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

This criminal act occurred several times as federal judges retaliated against Stich for making the
reports.



                                   Title 18 U.S.C. § 1510
Title 18 U.S.C. § 1510. Obstruction of criminal investigation.
(a) Whoever willfully endeavors by means of bribery to obstruct, delay, or prevent the
communication of information relating to a violation of any criminal statute of the United States by
any person to a criminal investigator shall be fined not more than $5,000, or imprisoned not more
than five years, or both.

This criminal statute occurred as federal judges refused to receive the evidence that Stich and his
group of government insiders sought to report. Federal judges refused to receive the evidence,
retaliated against Stich for seeking to make the reports, and then rendered orders barring Stich for
the remainder of his life from court access. In this way, Stich was unable to report the federal
crimes (and also unable to use federal defenses against the judicial violations of federally protected
rights that were inflicting great harm upon Stich.
                                   Title 18 U.S.C. § 1512
Title 18 U.S.C. § 1512. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant
(b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation or physical force, threatens, or corruptly persuades
another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with
intent to–

(1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding;

(2) cause or induce any person to–
(A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official
proceeding;
(3) hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United
States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense ...
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
(c) Whoever intentionally harasses another person and thereby hinders, delays, prevents, or
dissuades any person from–
(1) attending or testifying in an official proceeding;

(2) reporting to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States the commission or possible
commission of a Federal offense ... (3) arresting or seeking the arrest of another person in
connection with a Federal offense; or

(4) causing a criminal prosecution, or a parole or probation revocation preceding, to be sought or
instituted, or assisting in such prosecution or proceeding;

or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(e) For the purposes of this section–

(1) an official proceeding need not be pending or about to be instituted at the time of the offense;
and

(2) the testimony, or the record, document, or other object need not be admissible in evidence or
free of a claim of privilege.

Federal judges, and directly Sacramento district judge Milton Schwartz and San Francisco district
judge Marilyn Patel, aided by other judges, retaliated against Stich when he exercised the
mandatory responsibilities under the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. Section 4, to
report federal crimes "to a federal judge." In this manner they were guilty of criminal acts under
several criminal statutes.



                                   Title 18 U.S.C. § 1513
Title 18 U.S.C. § 1513. Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant.
(a) Whoever knowingly engages in any conduct and thereby causes bodily injury to another person
or damages the tangible property of another person, or threatens to do so, with intent to retaliate
against any person for (1) the attendance of a witness or party at an official proceeding, or any
testimony given or any record, document, or other object produced by a witness in an official
proceeding; or (2) any information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal
offense ..."



                                     Title 18 U.S.C. § 111
Title 18 U.S.C. § 111. Impeding certain officers or employees. Whoever ... intimidates, or
interferes with any person ... while engaged in ... the performance of his official duties shall be
fined ... or imprisoned ...

This crime occurred as management personnel at United Airlines and within the FAA interfered
with FAA inspectors attempts to report major air safety violations and criminal cover-ups of them
by false statements to the inspectors and falsified air safety documents. Many fatal crashes occurred
between 1958 and 1978 that were caused by or made possible by these criminal activities.



                          Collateral Damage Enabled By
                      Multiple Obstruction of Justice Schemes
All forms of human tragedies have been inflicted upon the people of the United States from the
corruption discovered by the people behind this site−and made possible by enablers in and out of
government. The below pictures are only a sampling of the consequences from the documented
corruption that are able to be portrayed graphically. The tragedies in other areas resulting from the
corruption, cover-ups, and public indifference, are not shown here.

In criminal law, people are accomplices, and guilty, if they know of a criminal act and fail to report
it to proper authorities and also to take efforts within their capability to halt their continuation. And
there are endless numbers of accomplices that are complicit in these crimes and enablers of the
consequences.

As a result of the widespread corruption in overt and covert government operations, the systemic
cover-ups that treat high-level corruption as the "third-rail," and the retaliation against
whistleblowers, great American tragedies have repeatedly occurred, and will continue to occur.

                         Victims of Less Catastrophic Events
There were many other forms of victims from the systemic high-level corruption. These included
for instance victims of the:
   •  Department of Justice prosecutorial misconduct, people being falsely charges with crimes in
      order to improve the prosecutors' career.
  • The explosion of violent crime related to drug smuggling into the United States, in which
      CIA assets were major players.
  • Series of financial frauds appearing every few years, with the latest housing and financial
      implosions surfacing in 2008.
  • Seizure of assets from innocent people.
These offenses are described in the books written by insiders.

                       Harm to People Overseas From
                  High-Level Corruption in the United States
In addition to the decades of harm resulting from the systemic corruption of key people and groups
in the U.S. government, affecting aviation safety, financial, human rights, in the United States,
there is the harm from outside sources brought about by the actions of U.S. politicians affecting
people in other countries—such as the history of invading and killing foreigners—there are the
successful "terrorist" attacks made possible by high-level corruption, and then there are the
foreigners who are also victims from the same high-level corruption that adversely affects the
American, but in a different form.

								
To top