The Best Kept Secret in America

Document Sample
The Best Kept Secret in America Powered By Docstoc
					Tavistock Institute- The Best Kept Secret in America
From Dr. Byron T. Weeks, MD
July 31, 2001
http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/nwotavistockbestkeptsecret.shtml

[Editor's Note: No one deserves more credit than Dr. John Coleman for bringing to light the
history and true purpose of the City of London's Tavistock Institute and its many subdivisional
institutions and organizations which was exposed in stunning detail in his 1992 book,
Conspirators' Hierachy: The Story of The Cimmittee of 300. Dr Coleman has rightly complained
that many NWO expose writers who have followed in his wake, have used his original research
without crediting him as the originating source and in fairness to him, it should be observed that
the information presented below is a reflection of his pioneering investigations into Tavistock.

The article below was sent to John Quinn by Dr. Byron Weeks. The insidious propaganda and
public opinion manipulations (including mind control agendas) orchestrated by London's
Tavistock Institute is covered at length in the books of David Icke and Dr John Coleman, but this
recent article adds fresh insights and historical perspective. Our thanks to Brice Taylor
<brice@teleplex.net> for forwarding...Ken Adachi]

Preface from John Quinn (NewsHawk)
This forwarded article was received from Byron Weeks; who in our opinion really has a good
firm handle on exactly WHAT is up on many levels with the extraordinarily extensive "control
trips" currently being directed against the peoples of the world by elements of the global shadow
government.

Weeks, whom I quoted at length in the book PHOENIX UNDEAD, has sent us this compelling
look at a globally-active British institute which has had it's hands in just about every social and
political/governmental movement of note throughout much of the world for the past 50 years.

For example, ever wonder who and what is "behind", let's say, the CIA? Well, they don't swear
allegiance to America, that's for certain. Try the British royal family.

This report is the real stuff--solidly researched and meticulously documented; so for lots more
truly concept-bending data, read on.

NewsHawk Inc.
-------------
To John Quinn

I believe Tavistock has always had secret ties to British Freemasonry.

Byron T. Weeks, MD
Col. AFUS, MC, Ret.
--------------------------
TAVISTOCK - THE BEST KEPT SECRET IN AMERICA

TAVISTOCK INSTITUTE . . . . . . . . .
30 Tabernacle Street, London EC2A 4DD.--

Formed in 1947, the Tavistock Institute is an independent not-for-profit organization which
seeks to combine research in the social sciences with professional practice. Problems of
institution-building and organizational design and change are being tackled in all sectors -
government, industry and commerce, health and welfare, education, etc. - nationally and
internationally, and clients range from multinationals to small community groups. A growth area
has been the use of a developmental approach to evaluation of new and experimental programs,
particularly in health, education and community development. This has also produced new
training events alongside the regular program of group relations conferences. The Institute owns
and edits the monthly journal Human Relations (published by Plenum Press) which is now in its
48th year, and has recently launched (in conjunction with Sage Publications) a new journal
Evaluation.

Three elements combine to make the Institute unusual, if not unique: it has the independence of
being entirely self-financing, with no subsidies from the government or other sources; the action
research orientation places it between, but not in, the worlds of academia and consultancy; and
its range of disciplines include anthropology, economics, organizational behavior, political
science, psychoanalysis, psychology and sociology.

The ideology of American foundations was created by the Tavistock Institute of Human
Relations in London. In 1921, the Duke of Bedford, Marquess of Tavistock, the 11th Duke, gave
a building to the Institute to study the effect of shellshock on British soldiers who survived
World War I. Its purpose was to establish the "breaking point" of men under stress, under the
direction of the British Army Bureau of Psychological Warfare, commanded by Sir John
Rawlings-Reese.

Tavistock Institute is headquartered in London. Its prophet, Sigmond Freud, settled in
Maresfield Gardens when he moved to England. He was given a mansion by Princess Bonaparte.
Tavistock's pioneer work in behavioral science along Freudian lines of "controlling" humans
established it as the world center of foundation ideology. Its network now extends from the
University of Sussex to the U.S. through the Stanford Research Institute, Esalen, MIT,
<http://watch.pair.com/Hudson.html>Hudson Institute,
<http://watch.pair.com/heritage.html>Heritage Foundation, Center of Strategic and International
Studies at Georgetown, where State Dept. personal are trained, US Air Force Intelligence, and
the Rand and Mitre corporations. The personnel of the corporations are required to undergo
indoctrination at one or more of these Tavistock controlled institutions. A network of secret
groups, the Mont Pelerin Society, Trilateral Commission, Ditchley Foundation, and the Club
of Rome is conduit for instructions to the Tavistock network.

[Editor, Tim Aho's note: See Watch Unto Prayer report on The Heritage Foundation founded by
Paul Weyrich with funding from Joseph Coors, who also founded and financed respectively the
Moral Majority and Council for National Policy.]
Tavistock Institute developed the mass brain-washing techniques which were first used
experimentally on American prisoners of war in Korea. Its experiments in crowd control
methods have been widely used on the American public, a surreptitious but nevertheless
outrageous assault on human freedom by modifying individual behavior through topical
psychology. A German refugee, Kurt Lewin, became director of Tavistock in 1932. He came to
the U.S. in 1933 as a "refugee", the first of many infiltrators, and set up the Harvard Psychology
Clinic, which originated the propaganda campaign to turn the American public against Germany
and involve us in World War II.

In 1938, Roosevelt executed a secret agreement with Churchill which in effect ceded U.S.
sovereignty to England, because it agreed to let Special Operations Executive control U.S.
policies. To implement this agreement, Roosevelt sent General Donovan to London for
indoctrination before setting up OSS (now the CIA) under the aegis of SOE-SIS. The entire OSS
program, as well as the CIA has always worked on guidelines set up by the Tavistock Institute.

[Editor, Tim Aho: See Watch Unto Prayer report on <http://watch.pair.com/jbs-cnp.html>The
John Birch Society & Council for National Policy for information regarding CIA operations on
the Christian Right.]

Tavistock Institute originated the mass civilian bombing raids carried out by Roosevelt and
Churchill purely as a clinical experiment in mass terror, keeping records of the results as they
watched the "guinea pigs" reacting under "controlled laboratory conditions". All Tavistock and
American foundation techniques have a single goal---to break down the psychological strength
of the individual and render him helpless to oppose the dictators of the World Order. Any
technique which helps to break down the family unit, and family inculcated principles of religion,
honor, patriotism and sexual behavior, is used by the Tavistock scientists as weapons of crowd
control.

The methods of Freudian psychotherapy induce permanent mental illness in those who undergo
this treatment by destabilizing their character. The victim is then advised to "establish new rituals
of personal interaction", that is, to indulge in brief sexual encounters which actually set the
participants adrift with no stable personal relationships in their lives, destroying their ability to
establish or maintain a family. Tavistock Institute has developed such power in the U.S. that no
one achieves prominence in any field unless he has been trained in behavioral science at
Tavistock or one of its subsidiaries.

Henry Kissinger, whose meteoric rise to power is otherwise inexplicable, was a German refugee
and student of Sir John Rawlings-Reese at SHAEF. Dr. Peter Bourne, a Tavistock Institute
psychologist, picked Jimmy Carter for President of the U.S. solely because Carter had undergone
an intensive brainwashing program administered by Admiral Hyman Rickover at Annapolis. The
"experiment" in compulsory racial integration in the U.S. was organized by Ronald Lippert, of
the OSS and the American Jewish Congress, and director of child training at the Commission on
Community Relations. The program was designed to break down the individual's sense of
personal knowledge in his identity, his racial heritage. Through the Stanford Research Institute,
Tavistock controls the National Education Association. The Institute of Social Research at the
National Training Lab brain washes the leading executives of business and government.
Such is the power of Tavistock that our entire space program was scrapped for nine years so that
the Soviets could catch up. The hiatus was demanded in an article written by Dr. Anatol Rapport,
and was promptly granted by the government, to the complete mystification of everyone
connected with NASA. Another prominent Tavistock operation is the Wharton School of
Finance, at the University of Pennsylvania. A single common denominator identifies the
common Tavistock strategy---the use of drugs. The infamous MK Ultra program of the CIA, in
which unsuspecting CIA officials were given LSD, and their reaction studied like "guinea pigs",
resulted in several deaths.

The U.S. Government had to pay millions in damages to the families of the victims, but the
culprits were never indicted. The program originated when Sandoz AG, a Swiss drug firm,
owned by S.G. Warburg Co. of London, developed Lysergic Acid [LSD]. Roosevelt's advisor,
James Paul Warburg, son of Paul Warburg who wrote the Federal Reserve Act, and nephew
of Max Warburg who had financed Hitler, set up the
<http://watch.pair.com/FreedomHouse.html#ips>Institute for Policy Studies to promote the drug.
The result was the LSD "counter-culture" of the 1960s, the "student revolution", which was
financed by $25 million from the CIA.

One part of MK Ultra was the Human Ecology Fund; the CIA also paid Dr. Herbert Kelman of
Harvard to carry out further experiments on mind control. In the 1950s, the CIA financed
extensive LSD experiments in Canada. Dr. D. Ewen Cameron, president of the Canadian
Psychological Association, and director of Royal Victorian Hospital, Montreal, received large
payments from the CIA to give 53 patients large doses of LSD and record their reactions; the
patients were drugged into weeks of sleep and then given electric shock treatments.

One victim, the wife of a member of the Canadian Parliament, is now suing the U.S. companies
who provided the drug for the CIA. All the records of the CIA's drug testing program were
ordered destroyed by the head of MK Ultra. Because all efforts of the Tavistock Institute are
directed toward producing cyclical collapse, the effect of the CIA programs are tragically
apparent. R. Emmett Tyrell Jr., writing in the Washington Post August 20, 1984, cites the
"squalid consequences of the 60s radicals in SDS" as resulting in "the growing rate of
illegitimacy, petty lawlessness, drug addiction, welfare, VD, and mental illness".

This is the legacy of the Warburgs and the CIA. Their principal agency, the Institute for Policy
Studies, was funded by James Paul Warburg; its co-founder was Marcus Raskin, protege of
McGeorge Bundy, president of the Ford Foundation. Bundy had Raskin appointed to the post of
President Kennedy's personal representative on the National Security Council, and in 1963
funded Students for Democratic Society, through which the CIA operated the drug culture.

Today the Tavistock Institute operates a $6 Billion a year network of Foundations in the U.S., all
of it funded by U.S. taxpayers' money. Ten major institutions are under its direct control, with
400 subsidiaries, and 3000 other study groups and think tanks which originate many types of
programs to increase the control of the World Order over the American people. The Stanford
Research Institute, adjoining the Hoover Institution, is a $150 million a year operation with 3300
employees. It carries on program surveillance for Bechtel, Kaiser, and 400 other companies, and
extensive intelligence operations for the CIA. It is the largest institution on the West Coast
promoting mind control and the behavioral sciences.

One of the key agencies as a conduit for secret instructions from Tavistock is the Ditchley
Foundation, founded in 1957. The American branch of the Ditchley Foundation is run by Cyrus
Vance, former Secretary of State, and director of the Rockefeller Foundation, and Winston
Lord, president of the Council on Foreign Relations.

[Editor, Tim Aho's note: The wife of Winston Lord (CFR, Bilderberg, Skull & Bones), Bette Bao
Lord (CFR, Bilderberg), is Chairman of the Board of Freedom House whose manipulation of the
Christian Right via the Religious Persecution issue is documented in our report
<http://watch.pair.com/FreedomHouse.html>Freedom House: A CFR Front.]

One of the principal but little known operations of the Rockefeller Foundation has been its
techniques for controlling world agriculture. Its director, Kenneth Wernimont, set up
Rockefeller controlled agricultural programs throughout Mexico and Latin America. The
independent farmer is a great threat to the World Order, because he produces for himself, and
because his produce can be converted into capital, which gives him independence. In Soviet
Russia, the Bolsheviks believed they had attained total control over the people; they were
dismayed to find their plans threatened by the stubborn independence of the small farmers, the
Kulaks.

Stalin ordered the OGPU to seize all food and animals of the Kulaks, and to starve them out. The
Chicago American, February 25, 1935 carried a front page headline, SIX MILLION PERISH IN
SOVIET FAMINE; Peasants' Crops Seized, They and their Animals Starve. To draw attention
from this atrocity, it was later alleged that the Germans, not the Soviets, had killed six million
people, the number taken from the Chicago American headline by a Chicago publicist.

The Communist Party, the Party of the Peasants and Workers, exterminated the peasants and
enslaved the workers. Many totalitarian regimes have found the small farmer to be their biggest
stumbling block. The French Reign of Terror was directed, not against the aristocrats, many of
whom were sympathetic to it, but against the small farmers who refused to turn over their grain
to the revolutionary tribunals in exchange for the worthless assignats. In the United States, the
foundations are presently engaged in the same type of war of extermination against the American
farmer.

The traditional formula of land plus labor for the farmer has been altered due to the farmer's need
for purchasing power, to buy industrial goods needed in his farming operations. Because of this
need for capital, the farmer is especially vulnerable to the World Order's manipulation of interest
rates, which is bankrupting him. Just as in the Soviet Union, in the early 1930s, when Stalin
ordered the Kulaks to give up their small plots of land to live and work on the collective farms,
the American small farmer faces the same type of extermination, being forced to give up his
small plot of land to become a hired hand for the big agricultural trusts. The Brookings
Institution and other foundations originated the monetary programs implemented by the Federal
Reserve System to destroy the American farmer, a replay of the Soviet tragedy in Russia, with
one proviso that the farmer will be allowed to survive if he becomes a slave worker of the giant
trusts.

Once the citizen becomes aware of the true role of the foundations, he can understand the high
interest rates, high taxes, the destruction of the family, the degradation of the churches into
forums for revolution, the subversion of the universities into CIA cesspools of drug addiction,
and the halls of government into sewers of international espionage and intrigue. The American
citizen can now understand why every agent of the federal government is against him; the
alphabet agencies, the FBI, IRS, CIA and BATF must make war on the citizen in order to carry
out the programs of the foundations.

The foundations are in direct violation of their charters, which commit them to do "charitable"
work, because they make no grants which are not part of a political goal. The charge has been
made, and never denied, that the Heritage-AEI network has at least two KGB moles on its staff.
The employment of professional intelligence operatives as "charitable" workers, as was done in
the Red Cross Mission to Russia in 1917, exposes the sinister political economic and social goals
which the World Order requires the foundations to achieve through their " bequests ".

Not only is this tax fraud, because the foundations are granted tax exemption solely to do
charitable work, but it is criminal syndicalism, conspiracy to commit offenses against the United
States of America, Constitutional Law 213, Corpus Juris Secundum 16. For the first time, the
close interlocking of the foundation "syndicate" has been revealed by the names of its principle
incorporators---Daniel Coit Gilman, who incorporated the Peabody Fund and the John Slater
Fund, and became an incorporator of the General Education Board (now the Rockefeller
Foundation); Gilman, who also incorporated the Russell Trust in 1856, later became an
incorporator of the Carnegie Institution with Andrew Dickson White (Russell Trust) and Frederic
A. Delano. Delano also was an original incorporator of the Brookings Institution and the
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Daniel Coit Gilman incorporated the Russell Sage Foundation with Cleveland H. Dodge of the
National City Bank. These foundations incorporators have been closely linked with the Federal
Reserve System, the War Industries Board of World War I, the OSS of World War II and the
CIA. They have also been closely linked with the American International Corporation, which
was formed to instigate the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. Delano, an uncle of Franklin Delano
Roosevelt, was on the original Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in 1914. His
brother-in-law founded the influential Washington law firm of Covington and Burling. The
Delanos and other ruling families of the World Order trace their lineage directly back to William
of Orange and the regime which granted the charter of the Bank of England.

Tavistock Institutions In The United States

Flow Laboratories Gets contracts from the National Institutes of Health.

Merle Thomas Corporation Gets contracts from the U.S. Navy, analyzes data from satellites.

Walden Research Does work in the field of pollution control.
Planning Research Corporation, Arthur D. Little, G.E. "TEMPO", Operations Research Inc.
Part of approximately 350 firms who conduct research and conduct surveys, make
recommendations to government. They are part of what President Eisenhower called "a possible
danger to public policy that could itself become captive of a scientific-technological elite."

Brookings Institution Dedicates its work to what it calls a "national agenda." Wrote President
Hoover's program, President Roosevelt's "New Deal", the Kennedy Administration's "New
Frontiers" program (deviation from it may have cost John F. Kennedy his life), and President
Johnson's "Great Society." Brookings has been telling the United States Government how to
conduct its affairs for the past 70 years and is still doing so.

Hudson Institute This institution has done more to shape the way Americans react to political
and social events, think, vote and generally conduct themselves than perhaps any except the BIG
FIVE. Hudson specializes in defense policy research and relations with the USSR. Most of its
military work is classified as SECRET. (One idea during the Vietnam War was to build a moat
around Saigon.) Hudson may be properly classified as one of the Committee of 300's
BRAINWASHING establishments. One of its largest clients is the U.S. Department of Defense
which includes matters of civil defense, national security, military policy and arms control.

[Editor, Tim Aho: This is the same <http://watch.pair.com/Hudson.html>Hudson Institute which
gave us GOALS 2000 and authored the Freedom From Religious Persecution Act, which became
the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998. This law required the creation of a federal
commission to monitor religion chaired by a presidentially-appointed Ambassador-at-Large on
International Religious Freedom under the mandates of the United Nations' covenants and
authority of the International Criminal Court.]

National Training Laboratories One of the key institutions established for this purpose in the
United States was the National Training Laboratories (NTL). Founded in 1947 by members of
the Tavistock network in the United States and located originally on an estate in Bethel, Maine,
NTL had as its explicit purpose the brainwashing of leaders of the government, educational
institutions, and corporate bureaucracies in the Tavistock method, and then using these "leaders"
to either themselves run Tavistock group sessions in their organizations or to hire other similarly
trained group leaders to do the job. The "nuts and bolts" of the NTL operation revolves around
the particular form of Tavistock degenerate psychology known as "group dynamics," developed
by German Tavistock operative Kurt Lewin, who emigrated to the United States in the 1930s and
whose students founded NTL.

In a Lewinite brainwashing group, a number of individuals from varying backgrounds and
personalities, are manipulated by a "group leader" to form a "consensus" of opinion, achieving a
new "group identity." The key to the process is the creation of a controlled environment, in
which stress is introduced (sometimes called dissonance) to crack an individual's belief structure.
Using the peer pressure of other group members, the individual is "cracked," and a new
personality emerges with new values. The degrading experience causes the person to deny that
any change has taken place. In that way, an individual is brainwashed without the victim
knowing what has taken place.
This method is the same, with some minor modification, used in all so-called "sensitivity groups"
or "T-groups," or in the more extreme rock-drug-sex counterculture form, "touchy-feely groups,"
such as the kind popularized from the 1960s onward by the Esalen Institute, which was set up
with the help of NTL.

From the mid-1950s onward, NTL put the majority of the nation's corporate leaderships through
such brainwashing programs, while running similar programs for the State Department, the Navy,
the Department of Education, and other sections of the federal bureaucracy. There is no firm
estimate of the number of Americans who have been put through this process in last 40 years at
either NTL, or as it is now known the NTL Institute for Applied Behavioral Sciences, which is
based in Rosslyn, Virginia, or its West Coast base of operations, the Western Training
Laboratories in Group Development, or in various satellite institutions. The most reliable
estimate is in the several millions.

One of the groups that went through the NTL mill in the 1950s was the leadership of the
National Education Association, the largest organization of teachers in the United States. Thus,
the NEA's outlook has been "shaped" by Tavistock, through the NTL. In 1964, the NTL Institute
became a direct part of the NEA, with the NTL setting up "group sessions" for all its affiliates.
With funding from the Department of Education, the NTL Institute drafted the programs for the
training of the nation's primary and secondary school teachers, and has a hand as well in
developing the content of educational "reforms," including OBE.

Also known as the International Institute for Applied Behavioral Sciences. This institute is a
brainwashing center in artificial stress training whereby participants suddenly find themselves
immersed in defending themselves against vicious accusations. NTL takes in the National
Education Association, the largest teacher group in the United States. While officially decrying
"racism", it is interesting to note that NTL, working with NEA, produced a paper proposing
education vouchers which would separate the hard-to-teach children from the brighter ones, and
funding would be allocated according to the number of difficult children who would be separated
from those who progressed at a normal rate. The proposal was not taken up.

University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School of Finance & Commerce Founded by Eric Trist
One of the "brain trusts" of Tavistock, Wharton has become one of the more important Tavistock
in so far as "Behavioral Research" is concerned. Wharton attracts clients such as the U.S.
Department of Labor---which teaches how to produce "cooked" statistics at the Wharton
Econometric Forecasting Associates Incorporated. This method was very much in demand as we
came to the close of 1991 with millions more out of work than was reflected in USDL statistics.
Wharton's ECONOMETRIC MODELING is used by every major Committee of 300 company in
the United States, Western Europe, the International Monetary Fund, the United Nations, and the
World Bank. Institute for Social Research Among its clients are The Ford Foundation,
U.S.Department of Defense, U.S.Postal Service and the U.S. Department of Justice. Among its
studies are "The Human Meaning Of Social Change", "Youth in Transition" and "How
Americans View Their Mental Health".

Institute For The Future This is not a typical Tavistock institution in that it is funded by the
Ford Foundation, yet it draws its long-range forecasting from the mother of all think tanks.
Institute for the Future projects what it believes to be changes that will be taking place in time
frames of fifty years. So called "DELPHI PANELS" decide what is normal and what is not, and
prepare position papers to "steer" government in the right direction to head off such groups as
"people creating civil disorder." (This could be patriotic groups demanding abolition of
graduated taxes, or demanding that their right to bear arms is not infringed.) This institute
recommends action such as liberalizing abortion laws, drug usage and that cars entering an urban
area pay tolls, teaching birth control in public schools, requiring registration of firearms, making
use of drugs a non-criminal offense, legalizing homosexuality, paying students for scholastic
achievements, making zoning controls a preserve of the state, offering bonuses for family
planning and last, but most frightening, a Pol Pot Cambodia-style proposal that new communities
be established in rural areas, (concentration camp compounds). As can be observed, many of
their goals have already been more than fully realized.

INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES (IPS)

One of the "Big Three", IPS has shaped and reshaped United States policies, foreign and
domestic, since it was founded by James P. Warburg and the Rothschild entities in the United
States. Its networks in America include the League for Industrial Democracy. Lead players in the
League for Industrial Democracy have included Jeane Kirkpatrick, former U.S. Ambassador to
the United Nations, Irwin Suall of the ADL, Eugene Rostow, Arms control negotiator, Lane
Kirkland, Labor Leader, and Albert Shanker. IPS was incorporated in 1963 by Marcus Raskin
and Richard Barnett, both highly trained Tavistock Institute graduates. The objectives of IPS
came from an agenda laid down for it by the Tavistock Institute, one of the most notable being to
create the "New Left" as a grass roots movement in the U.S. Its been said that Barnett and Raskin
controlled such diverse elements as the Black Panthers, Daniel Ellsberg, National Security
Council staff member Halprin, The Weathermen Underground, the Venceramos and the
campaign staff of candidate George McGovern. No scheme was too big for IFS and its
controllers to take on and manage.

Through its many powerful lobbing groups on Capitol Hill, IPS relentlessly used its "Big Stick"
to beat Congress. IPS has a network of lobbyists, all supposedly operating independently but in
actual fact acting cohesively, so that Congressmen are pummeled from all sides by seemingly
different and varied lobbyists, In this way, IPS was, and is still, able to successfully sway
individual Representatives and Senators to vote for "the trend, the way things are going." By
using key pointmen on Capitol Hill, IPS was able to break into the very infrastructure of our
legislative system and the way it works.

IPS became, and remains to this day, one of the most prestigious "think tanks" controlling
foreign policy decisions, which we, the people, foolishly believe are those of our law makers. By
sponsoring militant activism at home and with links to revolutionaries abroad, by engineering
such victories as "The Pentagon Papers," besieging the corporate structure, bridging the
credibility gap between underground movements and acceptable political activism, by
penetrating religious organizations and using them to sow discord in America, such as radical
racial policies under the guise of religion, using establishment media to spread IPS ideas, and
then supporting them, IPS has lived up to the role which it was founded to play.
[Editor, Tim Aho: See Watch Unto Prayer report on
<http://watch.pair.com/FreedomHouse.html>Freedom House: "Grants (for the IPS) came from
the Samuel Rubin Foundation and the Stern Family Fund. Samuel Rubin was himself a member
of the elite Comintern of the Communist Party, founded by none other than Lenin himself.
Billionaire Armand Hammer assisted Rubin in making the fortunes which helped launch IPS.
Philip Stern, an IPS trustee, was the president of Stern Fund. The executive director of the Stern
Fund, David R. Hunter, was previously an official of The National Council and the World
Council Of Churches. (Dr. James W. Wardner, Unholy Alliances, p.125)]

STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE

Jesse Hobson, the first president of Stanford Research Institute, in a 1952 speech made it clear
what lines the institute was to follow. Stanford can be described as one of the "jewels" in
Tavistock's Crown in its rule over the United States. Founded in 1946 immediately after the
close of WWII, it was presided over by Charles A. Anderson, with emphasis on mind control
research and "future sciences." Included under the Stanford umbrella was Charles F. Kettering
Foundation which developed the "Changing Images of Man" upon which the Aquarian
Conspiracy rests.

Some of Stanford's major clients and contracts were at first centered around the defense
establishment but, as Stanford grew, so, did the diversity of its services:

Applications of Behavioral Sciences to Research Management Office of Science and Technology

SRI Business Intelligence Program

U.S. Department of Defense Directorate of Defense Research and Engineering

U.S. Department of Defense Office of Aerospace Research

Among corporations seeking Stanford's services were Wells Fargo Bank, Bechtel Corporation,
Hewlett Packard, Bank of America, McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Blyth, Eastman Dillon and
TRW Company. One of Stanford's more secret projects was extensive work on chemical and
bacteriological warfare (CAB) weapons.

Stanford Research is plugged into at least 200 smaller "think tanks" doing research into every
facet of life in America. This is ARPA networking and represents the emergence of probably the
most far reaching effort to control the environment of every individual in the country. At present
Stanford's computers are linked with 2500 "sister" research consoles which include the CIA, Bell
Telephone Laboratories, U.S. Army Intelligence, The Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), Rand,
MIT, Harvard and UCLA. Stanford plays a key role in that it is the "library", cataloging all
ARPA documentation.

"Other agencies".....one can use one's imagination here, are allowed to search through SRI's
"library" for key words, phrases, look through sources and update their own master files with
those of Stanford Research Center. The Pentagon uses SRI's master files extensively, and there is
little doubt that other U.S. Government agencies do the same. Pentagon "command and control"
problems are worked out by Stanford.

While ostensibly these apply only to weapons and soldiers, there is absolutely no guarantee that
the same research could not , and will not be turned to civilian applications. Stanford is known to
be willing to do anything for anyone.

[Editor, Tim Aho: See Watch Unto Prayer report <http://watch.pair.com/dolphin.html>Lambert
Dolphin & the Great Sphinx, which documents the connections of SRI's Lambert Dolphin with
the Edgar Cayce Foundation and The Discernment Ministries.]

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (MIT),
ALFRED P. SLOAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

This major institute is not generally recognized as being a part of Tavistock U.S.A. Most people
look upon it as being a purely American institution, but that is far from the truth. MIT- Alfred
Sloan can be roughly divided into the following groups:

Contemporary Technology Industrial Relations NASA-ERC Computer Research Laboratories
Office of Naval Research Group, Psychology Systems Dynamics

Some of MIT's clients are:

American Management Association
Committee for Economic Development
GTE
Institute for Defense Analysis (IDA)
NASA
National Academy of Sciences
National Council of Churches
Sylvania
TRW
U.S. Army
U.S. Department of State
U.S. Navy
U.S. Treasury
Volkswagen Company

RAND RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Without a doubt, RAND is THE think tank most beholden to Tavistock Institute and certainly the
RIIA's most prestigious vehicle for control of United States policies at every level. Specific
RAND policies that became operative include our ICBM program, prime analyses for U.S.
foreign policy making, instigator of space programs, U.S. nuclear policies, corporate analyses,
hundreds of projects for the military, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in relation to the use
of mind altering drugs like peyote, LSD (the covert MK-ULTRA operation which lasted for 20
years).

[Editor, Tim Aho's note: The founder of the Rand Corporation, Herman Kahn, also founded the
Hudson Institute in 1961. In Educating for the New World Order, B.K. Eakman tells of a training
manual for "change agents" developed for the U.S. government by Rand Corporation: ". . . a
how-to manual with a 1971 U.S. Office of Education contract number on it entitled 'Training for
Change Agents'; seven volumes of 'change agent studies' commissioned by the U.S. Office of
Education to the Rand Corporation in 1973-74; scores of other papers submitted by behaviorist
researchers who had obtained grants from the U.S. Office of Education for the purpose of
exploring ways to 'freeze' and 'unfreeze' values, 'to implement change,' and to turn potentially
hostile groups and committees into acquiescent, rubber-stamp bodies by means of such strategies
as the 'Delphi Technique.'" (p. 118)]

Some of RAND's clients include:

American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T)
Chase Manhattan Bank
International Business Machines (IBM)
National Science Foundation
Republican Party
TRW
U.S. Air Force
U.S. Department of Health
U.S. Department of Energy

There are literally THOUSANDS of highly important companies, government institutions and
organizations that make use of RANDS's services. To list them all would be impossible. Among
RAND's specialities is a study group that predicts the timing and the direction of a thermonuclear
war, plus working out the many scenarios based upon its findings. RAND was once accused of
being commissioned by the USSR to work out terms of surrender of the United States
Government, an accusation that went all the way to the United States Senate, where it was taken
up by Senator Symington and subsequently fell victim to scorn poured out by the establishment
press. BRAINWASHING remains the primary function of RAND.

These institutions are among those that fund The UNIFORM LAW FOUNDATION, whose
function is to ensure that the Uniform Commercial Code remains the instrument for conducting
business in the United States.

http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/nwotavistockbestkeptsecret.shtml




                 Tavistock Institute Of Human Relations
                               (layer of The Committee of 300)
This group was formed at Oxford University, London, by the Royal Institute of Of
International Affairs in 1922. Major John Rawlings Reese, a British Army technician, was
instructed to set up the largest brainwashing facility in the world at the Tavistock Institute
for Human Relations as a part of Sussex University.

This became the core of Britain's Psychological Warfare Bureau. It was Tavistock-designed
methods that got the United States into the Second World War and which, under the
guidance of Dr. Kurt Lewin, established the OSS, the forerunner of the CIA. Lewin became
the director of the Strategic Bombing Survey, which was a plan for the Royal Air Force to
concentrate on bombing German worker housing while leaving military targets, such as
munition plants, alone. The munition plants on both sides belonged to the international
bankers who had no wish to see their assets destroyed. The idea behind saturation bombing
of civilian worker housing was to break the morale of the German worker.

It was not designed to affect the war effort against the German military machine. Lewin and
his team of actuaries reached a target figure, that if 65% of German worker housing was
destroyed by nightly RAF bombing, the morale of the civilian population would collapse. The
actual document was prepared by the Pru-dential Assurance Company. The RAF, under the
command of "Bomber" Harris, carried out Lewin's plans, culminating in the terror firestorm
bombing of Dresden, in which over 125,000, mainly old men, women and children, were
killed.

The truth of "Bomber" Harris's horror raids on German civilians was a well kept secret until
long after the end of WW II. Today its primary mission is to establish a global brainwashing
and opinion forming network. This institute is the originator of the Aquarian Conspiracy,
designed to weaken the nations of the world by encouraging drug use, free sex,
homosexuality and lesbianism. It has been very successful in the United States. It works
through many research institutes and think tanks. The principal ones in the United States
are the Stanford Research Institute, Rand Research and Development Corporation, the
Institute For Policy Studies, the Aspen Institute, the Hudson Institute, and the Brookings
Institute. Tavistock runs over 30 research institutions in the United States.

These Tavistock-U.S. institutions have in many cases grown into gargantuan monsters,
penetrating every aspect of our government agencies and taking command of all policy
making. One of Tavistock's chief wreckers of our way of life was Dr. Alexander King, a
founder member of NATO and a favorite with the Committee of 300, as well as an
outstanding member of the Club of Rome.

When it was decided that a super-body would control European affairs, the RIIA founded the
Tavistock Institute, which in turn created NATO. For Five years NATO was financed by the
German Marshall Fund. Dr. King was assigned by the Club of Rome to destroy America's
education by taking control of the National Teachers Association and working in close
conjunction with certain law makers and judges. Scientists engaged in the process of
conditioning are called "social engineers" or "new-science social scientists" and they play an
integral part in what we see, hear and read. The "old school" social engineers were Kurt K.
Lewin, Professor Hadley Cantril, Margaret Meade, Professor Derwin Cartwright and Professor
Lipssitt who, together with John Rawlings Reese, made up the backbone of new-science
scientists at Tavistock Institute.

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/tavistochumanrelations.htm
Tavistock Institute
From Wikipedia(View original Wikipedia article ») Last modified on 27 January 2012 at 17:34

Jump to: navigation, search

        This article is about the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations. For the organization which
        contains the Tavistock Centre for Couple Relationships, see Tavistock Institute of Medical
        Psychology, and for the current National Health arm see Tavistock Clinic

The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations is a British charity concerned with group behaviour and
organisational behaviour. It was launched in 1946, when it separated from the Tavistock Clinic.


  Table of Contents

  1 History of the Tavistock

  2 Focal point for psychoanalytical theory

  3 Current activities

  4 Relation to other 'Tavistocks'

  5 Notes

  6 Further reading



History of the Tavistock

The Institute was founded in 1946 by a group of key figures at the Tavistock Clinic including Elliott Jaques,
Henry Dicks, Leonard Browne, Ronald Hargreaves, John Rawlings Rees, Mary Luff and Wilfred Bion, with
Tommy Wilson as chairman, funded by a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation. Other well-known names
that joined the group later were John D. Sutherland, John Bowlby, Eric Trist, and Fred Emery. Kurt Lewin,
a member of the Frankfurt school in America, was an important influence on the work of the Tavistock,
according to Eric Trist, who expresses his admiration for Lewin in his autobiography.

Many of these founding members of the Tavistock Institute went on to play major roles in psychology.
John Rawlings Rees became first president of the World Federation for Mental Health. [4]

Jock Sutherland became director of the new post-war Tavistock Clinic, when it was incorporated into the
newly established British National Health Service in 1946. Ronald Hargreaves became deputy director of
the World Health Organization. Tommy Wilson became chairman of the Tavistock Institute. [5] [1]


Focal point for psychoanalytical theory
Many well-known psychologists and psychiatrists have passed through the Tavistock Institute over the
years, and it became known as the focal point in Britain for psychoanalysis and the psychodynamic
theories of Sigmund Freud and his followers. Other names associated with the Tavistock are Melanie
Klein, Carl Gustav Jung, J. A. Hadfield, Beckett, Charles Rycroft, Wilfred Bion, and R. D. Laing. [6] [2]


Current activities

According to its website, the Institute engages in educational, research, and consultancy work in the
social sciences and applied psychology. Its clients are chiefly public sector organizations, including the
European Union, several British government departments, and some private clients. The Institute owns
Human Relations, the international social sciences journal. It also edits the journal Evaluation.

It provides two MSc degree courses:

       Advanced Organisational Consultation, [7], jointly with City University, London[8]
       Leading Change and Organizational Development, jointly with the National School of Government
        and the University of Birmingham [9]


Relation to other 'Tavistocks'

The Tavistock Institute shares common roots with other organisations that emerged from the Tavistock
Clinic. This is a source of much confusion, though the facts can be ascertained from the historical account
of the Tavistock by Eric Trist, one time chairman of the Institute. [10]

The Clinic is now part of a National Health Service trust, while the "Tavistock Institute", which once did
research in many areas and was funded by many sources, is now a charity.

The name "Tavistock Institute of Medical Psychology", which was the name used for the original parent
body, is now used to refer to an organization that grew out of that parent body but now specializes in
couples relationships under the section name of the "Tavistock Centre for Couple Relationships".


Notes

    1. ^ A history of the Institute can be found in The Social Engagement of Social Science: A
       Tavistock Anthology published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in three volumes
       between 1990 and 1997.
    2. ^ Laing came to the Tavistock Institute in 1956 at the invitation of Jock Sutherland, who was then
       director of the Tavistock Clinic, to train on a grant. [1] [2] His training, under Charles Rycroft, was
       at the Institute of Psychoanalysis. [3] He left in 1965, and went on to develop his own ideas,
       particularly with regard to schizophrenia, which he suggested might be a natural and
       understandable curative process, rather than a disease of the mind. His views of schizophrenia,
       based largely on the concept of family nexus, were explained in a series of famous books such
       as Sanity, Madness and the Family. Laing is often associated with the Antipsychiatry movement.


Further reading

       Tavistock Institute website
       The Foundation and Development of the Tavistock Institute to 1989 by Eric Trist and Hugh
        Murray.
        "The A.K. Rice Institute for the Study of Social Systems". 2008. http://www.akriceinstitute.org/.
         Retrieved February 13, 2010.
        Young, Robert M. "The Culture of British Psychoanalysis"
        Trist, Eric L. et al. The Social Engagement of Social Science: A Tavistock Anthology : The Socio-
         Ecological Perspective (Tavistock Anthology), University of Pennsylvania, May 1997. ISBN 0-
         8122-8194-2
        Eric Trist - Autobiography online

Retrieved from "http://mediawiki.dp.teoma.com/wiki/Tavistock_Institute"
Categories: Organizations established in 1946 | Psychoanalysis | Psychology organizations | Systems
psychology | Research institutes in the United Kingdom | History of mental health in the United Kingdom |
History of psychiatry




                                               by Dr. John Coleman
                             from Conspirators’ Hierarchy - The Story of the Committee of 300
        FLOW LABORATORIES
          Gets contracts from the National Institute of Health.
        MERLE THOMAS CORPORATION
          Gets contracts from the U.S. Navy, analyzes data from satellites.
        WALDEN RESEARCH
          Does work in the field of pollution control.
        PLANNING RESEARCH CORPORATION, ARTHUR D. LITTLE, G.E. “TEMPO,”
          OPERATIONS RESEARCH INC.
          Part of approximately 350 firms who conduct research and conduct surveys, make
          recommendations to government. They are part of what President Eisenhower called “a
          possible danger to public policy that could itself become captive of a scientific-technological
          elite.”
        BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
          Dedicates its work to what it calls a “national agenda.” Wrote President Hoover’s program,
          President Roosevelt’s “New Deal,” the Kennedy Administration’s “New Frontiers” program
          (deviation from it cost John F. Kennedy his life), and President Johnson’s “Great Society.”
          Brookings has been telling the United States Government how to conduct its affairs for the past
          70 years and is still doing so on behalf of the Committee of 300.
        HUDSON INSTITUTE
          Under the direction of Herman Khan, this institution has done more to shape the way Americans
          react to political and social events, think, vote and generally conduct themselves than perhaps
          any except the BIG FIVE. Hudson specializes in defense policy research and relations with the
          USSR. Most of its military work is classified as SECRET. (One idea during the Vietnam War was
          to build a moat around Saigon.) Some of its earlier papers were entitled “Stability and Tranquility
          Among Older Nations,” and “Analytical Summary of U.S. National Security Policy Issues.”

          Hudson prides itself on its diversity; it helped NASA with its space programs and helped to
          promote new youth fashions and ideas, youth rebellion and alienation for the Committee of 300,
          ostensibly funded by Coca Cola. Hudson may be quite properly classified as one of the
    Committee of 300’s BRAIN-WASHING establishments. Some of its nuclear war scenarios make
    for very interesting reading and, if they can be obtained, I would recommend “The 6 Basic
    Thermonuclear Threats” and “Possible Outcomes of Thermonuclear War” and one of its more
    frightening papers entitled “Israeli-Arab Nuclear War.”

    Hudson also does corporate advising for Committee of 300 companies, Rank, Xerox, General
    Electric, IBM and General Motors, to name but a few of them, but its really big client remains the
    U. S. Department of Defense which includes matters of civil defense, national security, military
    policy and arms control. To date it has not got into “wet NASA,” that is to say, the National
    Oceanographic Agency.
   NATIONAL TRAINING LABORATORIES
    NTL is also known as the International Institute for Applied Behavioral Sciences. This institute is
    definitely a brainwashing center based on Kurt Lewin principles which include so-called T-
    Groups (training groups), artificial stress training whereby participants suddenly find themselves
    immersed in defending themselves against vicious accusations. NTL takes in the National
    Education Association, the largest teacher-group in the United States.

    While officially decrying “racism,” it is interesting to note that NTL, working with NEA, produced
    a paper proposing education vouchers which would separate the hard-to-teach children from the
    brighter ones, and funding would be allocated according to the number of difficult children who
    would be separated from those who progressed at a normal rate. The proposal was not taken
    up.
   UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, WHARTON - SCHOOL OF FINANCE &
     COMMERCE
    Founded by Eric Trist, one of the “brain trusts” of Tavistock, Wharton has become one of the
    more important Tavistock institutions in the U.S. in so far as “Behavioral Research” is concerned.
    Wharton attracts clients such as the U.S. Department of Labor—which it teaches how to
    produce “cooked” statistics at the Wharton Econometric Forecasting Associates Incorporated.
    This method is very much in demand as we come to the close of 1991 with millions more out of
    work than is reflected in USDL statistics.

    Wharton’s ECONOMETRIC MODELING is used by every major Committee of 300 company in
    the United States, Western Europe and by the International Monetary Fund, the United Nations
    and the World Bank. Wharton has produced such note-worthy persons as George Schultz and
    Alan Greenspan.
   INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH
    This is the institute set up by “brain trusters” from Tavistock Rensis Likert, Dorwin Cartwright
    and Ronald Lippert. Among its studies are:
        o “The Human Meaning of Social Change”
        o “Youth in Transition”
        o “How Americans View Their Mental Health”
    Among the institute’s clients are
        o The Ford Foundation
        o U.S. Department of Defense
        o U.S. Postal Service and the U.S.Department of Justice
   INSTITUTE FOR THE FUTURE
    This is not a typical Tavistock institution in that it is funded by the Ford Foundation, yet it draws
    its long-range forecasting methodology from the mother of all think tanks. Institute for the Future
    projects what it believes to be changes that will be taking place in time frames of fifty years. The
    institute is supposed to be able to forecast socioeconomic trends and to blow the whistle on any
    departures from what it has laid down as normal.
    Institute for the Future believes it is possible and normal to intervene now and give decisions for
    the future. So-called “Delphi Panels” decide what is normal and what is not, and prepare
    position papers to “steer” government in the right direction to head off such groups as “people
    creating civil disorder.”
    (This could be patriotic groups demanding abolition of graduated taxes, or demanding that their
    right to bear arms is not infringed.)

    The institute recommends actions such as liberalizing abortion laws, drug usage and that cars
    entering an urban area pay tolls, teaching birth control in public schools, requiring registration of
    firearms, making the use of drugs a non-criminal offense, legalizing homosexuality, paying
    students for scholastic achievements, making zoning controls a preserve of the state, offering
    bonuses for family planning and last, but by no means least, a Pol Pot Cambodia-style proposal
    that new communities be established in rural areas. As will be observed, many of the Institute
    for the Future’s goals have already been more than fully realized.
   INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES (IPS)
    One of the “Big Three,” IPS has shaped and reshaped United States policies, foreign and
    domestic, since it was founded by James P. Warburg and the Rothschild entities in the United
    States, bolstered by Bertrand Russell and the British Socialists through its networks in America
    which include the League for Industrial democracy in which Leonard Woodcock played a leading,
    if behind-the-scenes role. Local lead players in the League for Industrial Democracy included
    “conservative” Jeane Kirkpatrick, Irwin Suall (of the ADL), Eugene Rostow (Arms Control
    negotiator), Lane Kirkland (Labor leader), and Albert Shanker.

    For record purposes only, IPS was incorporated in 1963 by Marcus Raskin and Richard
    Barnett, both highly-trained Tavistock Institute graduates. Most of the funding came from
    Rothschild associates in America like the James Warburg Family, the Stern Family Foundation
    and the Samuel Rubin Foundation. Samuel Rubin was a registered member of the Communist
    Party who stole the Faberge name (Faberge was “Jeweler of the Imperial Russian Court”) and
    made a fortune out of the Faberge name.

    The objectives of IPS came from an agenda laid down for it by the British Round Table, which
    agenda in turn came from Travistock Institute, one of the most notable being to create the “New
    Left” as a grass roots movement in the U.S. IPS was to engender strife and unrest and spread
    chaos like a wildfire out of control, proliferate the “ideals” of left wing nihilistic socialism, support
    unrestricted use of drugs of all types, and be the “big stick” with which to beat the United States
    political establishment.

    Barnett and Raskin controlled such diverse elements as,
       o the Black Panthers
       o Daniel Ellsberg
       o National Security Council staff member Halperin
       o The Weathermen Underground
       o the Venceramos
       o the campaign staff of candidate George McGovern
    No scheme was too big for IPS and its controllers to take on and manage.

    Take the plot to “kidnap” Kissinger, which was in the hands of Eqbal Ahmed, a British MI-6
    intelligence agent of Pakistani origin, laundered through “TROTS” (Trotskyite terrorists based in
    London). The “plot” was “discovered” by the FBI so that it could not go too far. Ahmed went on
    to become the director of one of IPS’s most influential agencies, The Transnational Institute
    which, chameleon-like, changed from its former name, Institute of Race Relations, when
    intelligence agents of BOSS (Bureau of State Security) in South Africa unmasked the fact that it
    was tied directly to Rhodes Scholarship-Harry Oppenheimer and Anglo-American-British mining
    interests in South Africa. BOSS also discredited the South Africa Foundation at the same time.
    Through its many powerful lobbying groups on Capitol Hill, IPS relentlessly used its “big stick” to
    beat Congress. IPS has a network of lobbyists, all supposedly operating independently but in
    actual fact acting cohesively, so that Congressmen are pummeled from all sides by seemingly
    different and varied lobbyists. In this way, IPS was, and is still, able to successfully sway
    individual Representatives and Senators to vote for “the trend, the way things are going.” By
    using key point men on Capitol Hill, IPS was able to break into the very infrastructure of our
    legislative system and the way it works.

    To give only a single concrete example of what I am talking about: in 1975, an IPS point man
    persuaded representative John Conyers (D-Michigan) and forty-seven members of the House to
    request IPS to prepare a budget study that would oppose the budget being prepared by
    President Gerald Ford. Although not adopted, the request was reinstated in 1976, 1977, and
    1978 gathering sponsors as it went.

    Then in 1978, fifty-six Congressmen signed their names to sponsor an IPS budget study. This
    was prepared by Marcus Raskin. Raskin’s budget called for a fifty percent cut in the Defense
    Budget, a socialist housing program “that would compete with and steadily replace private
    housing and mortgage markets,” a national health service, “radical changes in the educational
    system that would disrupt capitalist control over the distribution of knowledge,” and several other
    radical ideas.

    The influence of IPS on Arms Control negotiations was a major factor in getting Nixon to sign
    the treasonous ABM Treaty in 1972, which left the United States virtually defenseless against
    ICBM attack for almost 10 years. IPS became, and remains to this day one of the most
    prestigious “think tanks” controlling foreign policy decisions, which we, the people, foolishly
    believe are those of our law makers.

    By sponsoring militant activism at home and with links to revolutionaries abroad, by engineering
    such victories as “The Pentagon Papers,” besieging the corporate structure, bridging the
    credibility gap between underground movements and acceptable political activism, by
    penetrating religious organizations and using them to sow discord in America, such as radical
    racial politics under the guise of religion, using the establishment media to spread IPS ideas,
    and then supporting them, IPS has lived up to the role which it was founded to play.
   STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    Jesse Hobson, the first president of Stanford Research Institute, in a 1952 speech made it
    clear what lines the institute was to follow.
    Stanford can be described as one of the “jewels” in Tavistock’s Crown in its rule over the United
    States. Founded in 1946 immediately after the close of WW II, it was presided over by Charles
    A. Anderson, with emphasis on mind control re-search and “future sciences.” Included under
    the Stanford umbrella was Charles F. Kettering Foundation which developed the “Changing
    Images of Man” upon which the Aquarian Conspiracy rests.

    Some of Stanford’s major clients and contracts were at first centered around the defense
    establishment but, as Stanford grew, so did the diversity of its services:
        o Applications of Behavioral Sciences to Research
        o Management
        o Office of Science and Technology
        o SRI Business Intelligence Program
        o U.S. Department of Defense Directorate of Defense
        o Research and Engineering
        o U.S. Department of Defense Office of Aerospace Research
    Among corporations seeking Stanford’s services were
        o Wells Fargo Bank
        o Bechtel Corporation
        o Hewlett Packard
        o Bank of America
        o McDonnell-Douglas Corporation
        o Blyth
        o Eastman Dillon
        o TRW Company
    One of Stanford’s more secret projects was extensive work on chemical and bacteriological
    warfare (CAB) weapons.

    Stanford Research is plugged into at least 200 smaller “think tanks” doing research into every
    facet of life in America. This is known as ARPA networking and represents the emergence of
    probably the most far-reaching effort to control the environment of every individual in the country.
    At present Stanford’s computers are linked with 2500 “sister” research consoles which include
    the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Bell Telephone Laboratories, U.S. Army Intelligence, the
    Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), RANI, MIT, Harvard and UCLA. Stanford plays a key role in
    that it is the “library,” cataloging all ARPA documentation.

    “Other agencies”—and one can use one’s imagination here, are allowed to search through SRI’s
    “library” for key words, phrases, look through sources and update their own master files with
    those of Stanford Research Center. The Pentagon, for instance, uses SRI’s “master files”
    extensively, and there is little doubt that other U.S. Government agencies do the same.
    Pentagon “command and control” problems are worked out by Stanford.

    While ostensibly these apply only to weapons and soldiers, there is absolutely no guarantee that
    the same research could not, and will not, be turned to civilian applications. Stanford is known to
    be willing to do anything for anyone, and it is my belief that if ever SRI were to be fully exposed,
    the hostility which would arise from revelations as to what it actually does would most probably
    force SRI to close.
   MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, ALFRED P. SLOAN
    SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

    This major institute is not generally recognized as being a part of Tavistock U.S.A. Most people
    look upon it as a purely American institution, but that is far from being the case. MIT-Alfred
    Sloan can be roughly divided into the following groups:
        o Contemporary Technology
        o Industrial Relations
        o Lewin Group Psychology
        o NASA-ERC Computer Research Laboratories
        o Office of Naval Research Group, Psychology
        o Systems Dynamics.
    Forrestor and Meadows wrote The Club of Rome’s “Limits of Growth” zero growth study.
    Some of MIT’s clients include the following:
        o American Management Association
        o American Red Cross
        o Committee for Economic Development
        o GTE
        o Institute for Defense Analysis (IDA)
        o NASA
        o National Academy of Sciences
        o National Council of Churches
        o Sylvania
        o TRW
        o U.S. Army
        o U.S. Department of State
        o U.S. Navy
            o U.S. Treasury
            o Volkswagen Company
        So vast is the reach of IDA that it would take hundreds of pages to describe the activities in
        which it is engaged, and IDA is fully described in my book on the role played by Institutions and
        Foundations in committing treason against the United States of America, which will be published
        early in 1992.
       RAND RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

        Without a doubt, RAND is THE think tank most beholden to Tavistock Institute and certainly
        the RIIA’s most prestigious vehicle for control of United States policies at every level.

        Specific RAND policies that became operative include our ICBM program, prime analyses for
        U.S. foreign policy making, instigator of space programs, U.S. nuclear policies, corporate
        analyses, hundreds of projects for the military, the Central intelligence Agency (CIA) in relation
        to the use of mind altering drugs like peyote, LSD (the covert MK-Ultra operation which lasted
        for 20 years).

          Some of RAND’s clients include the following:
               o American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T)
               o Chase Manhattan Bank
               o International Business Machines (IBM)
               o National Science Foundation
               o Republican Party
               o TRW
               o U.S. Air Force
               o U.S. Department of Energy
               o U.S. Department of Health
          There are literally THOUSANDS of highly important companies, government institutions and
          organizations that make use of RAND’s services, and to list them all would be an impossible
          task. Among RAND’s “specialities” is a study group that predicts the timing and the direction of a
          thermonuclear war, plus working out the many scenarios based upon its findings.
          RAND was once accused of being commissioned by the USSR to work out terms of surrender
          of the United States Government, an accusation that went all the way to the United States
          Senate, where it was taken up by Senator Symington and subsequently fell victim to articles of
          scorn poured out by the establishment press. BRAIN WASHING remains the primary function of
          RAND.
To summarize, the major Tavistock institutions in the United States engaged in brainwashing at all
levels, including government, the military, business, religious organizations and education are the
following:
       Brookings Institution
       Hudson Institute
       Institute for Policy Studies
       Massachusetts Institute of Technology
       National Training Laboratories
       Rand Research and Development Corporation
       Stanford Research Institute
       Wharton School at University of Pennsylvania
It is estimated by sources of mine that the total number of people employed by these institutions is in the
region of 50,000 with funding close to $10 billion dollars.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_tavistock05.htm
Chapter 7.4: Mont Pelerin, Ford Foundation and Tavistock


The Mont Pelerin Society, Ford Foundation and Tavistock Institute

       The Mont Pelerin Society
       The Ford Foundation
       The Tavistock Institute
       Summary
       Appendix I

The Mont Pelerin Society

The present star of the Hoover Institution is Milton Friedman, who is credited with bringing
economic disaster to Chile, Israel, the United States, and other countries in which his
"monetarist" theories have been introduced. Friedman's "monetarism" is the same old
bankers' swindle of endless creation of more interest bearing debt money, requiring ever
increasing taxes merely to meet the interest payments. He and Jack Kemp are now
pushing for a "flat tax" to lock Americans into a tax corral from which they can never hope
to escape.

Friedman came to the Hoover in 1977 as senior research fellow, simultaneously accepting
a post as economic consultant to the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. He and his
consort, Murray Rothbard, dominate a closely interlocked network of "hard money",
"conservative" groups, which includes the Heritage Foundation, Mont Pelerin Society,
Cato Institute, Ludwig von Mises Institute, and American Enterprise Institute, which hold
banquet meetings, always with no visible result. Their mentor is the late Ludwig von Mises,
born in Austria, and founder of "the Austrian School of Economics", who taught at New
York University from 1946 until his death. The Institute is now run by his widow, Margit
Herzfeld, to whom President Reagan said, at a testimonial dinner for her husband, "You
don't know how often I consult the books of your husband before making a decision." She
still doesn't know.

At the age of 16, Milton Friedman became the protege of Arthur Burns at Rutgers and
Columbia. Their economic principles stemmed from the "Viennese School" founded by
Karl Menger and Eugen von Bauwerk. Merger taught von Hayek, Eric Voegelin and Fritz
Machluys. At that time. Vienna was dominated by the House of Rothschild, which had
controlled the national debt of Austria since the Congress of Vienna in 1815. Austria's
Tyrol silver mines were owned by the Rothschilds, as were her railways. Empress
Elizabeth's closest friend was Julie de Rothschild, sister of Baron Albert, head of the
Austrian House.

Count Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, who founded the Pan European Union, was named
after Richard Wagner, one of whose students was Gustav Mahler. Mahler's studies with
Wagner were funded by Baron Albert de Rothschild. Coudenhove-Kalergi's father was a
close friend of Theordor Herzl, founder of Zionism. Coudenhove-Kalergi writes in his
"Memoirs":

"At the beginning of 1924, we received a call from Baron Louis de Rothschild; one of his
friends, Max Warburg from Hamburg, had read my book and wanted to get to know us. To
my great surprise, Warburg spontaneously offered us 60,000 gold marks, to tide the
movement over for its first three years .... Max Warburg, who was one of the most
distinguished and wisest men that I have ever come into contact with, had a principle of
financing these movements. He remained sincerely interested in Pan-Europe for his entire
life. Max Warburg arranged his 1925 trip to the United States to introduce me to Paul
Warburg and financier Bernard Baruch."

In Chicago, Jane Adams of Hull House had been for five years a protege of Beatrice
Webb, founder of the Fabian Society. In 1892, the University of Chicago was organized as
the center of the Fabian Socialist program in America, with J. Laurence Laughlin,
spokesman for the Cobden Club's "free trade" program in England. Laughlin later became
Paul Warburg's chief propagandist to stump for the passing of the Federal Reserve Act.

John Dewey became head of the Sociology Dept. at the Univ. of Chicago; Wesley Clair
Mitchell was head of the economics dept. In 1913, they moved to Columbia University.
They were later hired by Baruch at the War Industries Board, and prepared all the
statistics for American representatives at the Versailles Peace Conference. In Feb. 1920,
Mitchell met with the rest of the staff of Baruch's War Industries Board in New York with a
Round Table group financed by Kuhn Loeb & Co. and Lazard Freres, to found the Natl
Bureau of Economic Research, of which Mitchell became director. His protege was Arthur
Burns, later chmn of the Natl Bureau, chmn Federal Reserve Governors, partner of Lazard
Freres, and U.S. Ambassador to West Germany. Burns then brought in his protege, Milton
Friedman, who has proposed that we legalize the sale of dope to raise $100 billion a year
for the GNP.

Wesley Clair Mitchell's career was devoted to uniting the Austrian and British schools of
economics in a single force to direct the American economy. He achieved success
through the careers of his proteges, Burns and Friedman, who offer us the "flat rate" tax to
pay interest on their bank-created debt money. It is the ancient European system
introduced by the House of Rothschild to loot national economies by the rentier system of
national debt.

A keystone of the Friedman-Burns network is the Mont Pelerin Society, a secretive group
of economists which meets every two years, but issues no findings or recommendations.
These supposedly conservative hard money economists first met at Mont Pelerin,
Switzerland in 1947 to oppose the leftwing statist economists who had dominated the field
for fifty years. They were led by Frederick von Hayek, a graduate of the Viennese school
of economics, who became a British citizen in 1938. He was Tooke prof. of economics,
Univ. of London 1931-50, prof. of social and moral science at the Univ. of Chicago 1950-
62, and prof. of economics Univ. of Freiburg 1962-69, when he retired to Salzburg. He
was a disciple of Ludwig von Mises, who taught Henry Hazlitt, another founder of Mont
Pelerin. Hazlitt reported the founding meeting in Newsweek, Sept. 25, 1961, listing among
those present:

       Jacques Rueff, economic director of France
       Pedro Beltran, president of Peru
       Sen. Luigi Einaudi, prof. economics at Turin 1901-35, Governor of the Bank of
        Italy 1945-48, president of Italy 1948-55
       Dr. Ludwig Erhard, Economic Minister of Germany, director of World Bank
       Wilhelm Roepke, Erhard's economic adviser
       Trygve Hoff, Norway
       Muller-Armack and William Rappard of Germany
       Ludwig von Mises
       Frank Knight
       Milton Friedman
       Henry Hazlitt
In 1962, the Mont Pelerin Society met at Knokke, Belgium, announcing that "The Mont
Pelerin Society takes no formal action, passes no resolutions, and seeks no publicity." In
1970, the Society met in Munich, where Milton Friedman was elected president. Present
were Wesley Campbell and Martin Anderson from the Hoover Institution. In 1974, 300
members of the Society met at Brussels, where they were addressed by Milton Friedman
and his protege Murray Rothbard. Rothbard was sponsored by the Cato Institute, a
"conservative" group whose director, Earl C. Ravenel, is also director of the Institute for
Policy Studies, the leftwing policy-making organization founded by James Paul Warburg.

Cato Institute is funded by Charles Koch of Kansas, head of Koch industries, who
amassed a fortune of $700 million. He also funds the Libertarian Party, which calls for
opening U.S. borders to all illegal immigrants, legalizing of drugs, and other alarming
recommendations. Koch funds these groups through his bank, Morgan Guaranty Trust of
N.Y.

Cato gave a two year grant to Rothbard to write a book, "For a New Liberty", which says,
"Before World War II, so devoted was Stalin to peace that he failed to make adequate
provision against Nazi attack." Rothbard should have said, "So devoted was Stalin to
murder that he killed most of his Army officers, leaving him vulnerable to Nazi attack."
Rothbard asserts that the U.S. is imperialist and war-mongering, while the Soviet Union is
peace-loving, rational and misunderstood! The Cato Institute magazine Inquiry lists 9 staff
writers, among them Nat Hentoff of the Village Voice, Marcus Raskin, head of the Institute
for Policy Studies, and Penny Lernoux, correspondent of the Nation, all of whom would be
hurt if they were not described as extreme liberals.

In 1975, George Roche III, who had become a member of the Society in 1971, hosted the
meeting at Hillsdale College, of which he is president. William Buckley, also a member,
addressed the group with a routine encomium for von Hayek.

In 1980, the Mont Pelerin Society met at the Hoover Institution, with 600 members and
guests present. Ralph Harris was guest speaker. As Margaret Thatcher's director of
economics, he had been made Baron Harris of High Cross in 1979. Count Max Thurn,
permanent secretary of the Society, also addressed the meeting. He is a member of the
wealthy Thurn und Taxis family, closely related to the British royal family.

The Encyclopaedia of Associations lists the Mont Pelerin Society, c/o Edwin Feulner,
treasurer, Box 7031, Alexandria, Va; secretary Dr. Max Thurn, Elizabethstrasse 4, Vienna.
Feulner is president of the Heritage Foundation, served as confidential asst. to Secretary
of Defense 1969-70; adm asst. Phil Crane 1940-44, public affairs fellow Hoover Institution
1965-67, chmn Institute Europan Strategy and Defense Studies London since 1979.

Heritage Foundation, part of the network of "conservative" groups, sponsored Reagan's
posthumous award of the Medal of Freedom to Whittaker Chambers in March 1984. Its
directors are:

       Shelby Cullom Davis, director of Hoover
       Joseph Coors, director of Hoover
       Midge Decter, exec. director Committee for a Free World, her husband is "neo-
        conservative" Norman Podhoretz, editor of Commentary magazine
       Robert Dee, chmn Smith Kline drug firm, director United Technologies with
        William Simon
       William Simon, director Citibank, former Secretary of the Treasury
       Lewis E. Lehrman, head of the Lehrman Institute
       John D. Wrather, heir to an oil fortune, head of the entertainment conglomerate
        Wrather Inc. and director of Hoover.

Feulner claims that Heritage cooperates with more than 400 groups in the U.S. and 100
overseas. Honarary chairman is Frank Shakespeare. Chairman of the editorial board is
David Meiselman of the Mont Pelerin Society. Richard Reeves mentions in the N.Y. Times
Magazine, July 15, 1984: "Edwin J. Feulner is president of the Heritage Foundation, one of
the right's most productive idea factories." He failed to cite a single "idea" produced by this
factory. The star of Heritage and its closely affiliated American Enterprise Institute is
Jeane Kirkpatrick, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. She is routinely mentioned in terms of
fulsome praise such as the Communist Party used to reserve for Stalin; National Review
gushes over her, and also raves about "the ever gallant, charming, freedom-loving
Friedmans" whose "energy, lucidity and patience" awes Buckley's propagandists.

Jeane Kirkpatrick has been prof. at Georgetown Univ. since 1967, chief of research
American Enterprise Institute since 1977, director of Center for Strategic and International
Studies at Georgetown. She is the wife of veteran intelligence operative Evron Kirkpatrick,
OSS 1945, intelligence specialist Dept. of State 1946-54 as chief psychological
intelligence research staff specializing in behavioural science (people control). He has
been head of the American Political Science Association since 1954, and is president of
the American Peace Society which publishes a quarterly called World Affairs.

The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) was founded by William J. Baroody and Milton
Friedman in 1943; Baroody left in 1978 to take over the $7 million a year Center for
Strategic and International Studies at Georgetown. His son, William Jr. former adviser to
President Nixon, took over AEI and its staff of 150. Jr. was adm. asst. to Congressman
Melvin Laird 1961-68, who then became Secretary of Defense; Baroody was spec. adviser
at Defense 1969-73, spec. adviser to the President of the U.S. 1973-74, and is chairman
Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Directors of American Enterprise
Institute include:

       Edward Bernstein
       James S. Duesenberg, Presidential Council of Economic Advisers 1966-68, prof.
        at Harvard, director Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Fulbright fellow Cambridge
        England 1954-55
       Frederick A. Praeger, emigre N.Y. publisher who published a number of
        propaganda works for the CIA
       Herbert Stein, A. Willis Robertson prof of economics, Univ. of Va., editor AEI
        publication The Economist since 1977, served on War Production Board 1941-44,
        Brookings Institution fellow 1967-69, Council of Economic Advisers 1969,
        chairman 1972-74
       Robert H. Bork, prof. law at Yale, former Solicitor General and Acting Atty. Gen. of
        U.S. 1973-77
       Kenneth W. Daum, former partner Cravath Swaine & Moore, Wall Street law firm,
        now prof. of law, Univ. of Chicago
       D. Gale Johnson, prof. economics at Univ. of Chicago since 1944, economist with
        OPA 1942, State Dept. 1946, U.S. Army econ. 1948, adviser to Congress 1974-76,
        consultant to TVA, Rand Corp. and AID, director William Benton Fndtn
       Robert Nisbet, John Dewey lecturer at John Dewey Society, Rockefeller
        Foundation grant 1975-78, scholar at AEI since 1978
       James D. Wilson, Shattuck prof. at Harvard
       Richard B. Madden, chmn exec. committee AEI, chairman Socony Mobil since
        1956, director Pacific Gas & Electric, Del Monte and Weyerhauser
       Willard C. Butcher, former chmn Chase Manhattan Bank
       Charles T. Fisher III, president Natl Bank of Detroit, director General Motors,
        Detroit Edison
       Richard D. Wood, president Eli Lilly drugs since 1961, director Standard Oil of
        Indiana, and Chemical Bank.

Thus the well-funded "Hard Right" American Enterprises Institute's board of directors
reads much like that of the Rockefeller Foundation or the Hoover Institution -- the usual
New York banks, Standard Oil, General Motors crowd. The World Order maintains control.

Lewis Lehrman, director of Heritage Foundation, and founder of the 1000 store Rite Aid
drug chain, set up his own foundation in 1978. After agonizing over a trenchant attention-
getting name, he chose the obvious, Lewis Lehrman Institute. Its president is Robert W.
Tucker, member of the Council on Foreign Relations, professor at John Hopkins School of
International Studies, which was made famous by the tenure of Owen Lattimore,
denounced by Sen. McCarthy as a leading Soviet agent. Director of Lehrman Institute is
Barton Biggs of Brookings Institution. Lehrman spent $13.9 million campaigning to be
elected Governor of New York, but was easily beaten by Mario Cuomo, who only spent
$4.8 million. The New Republic Dec. 5, 1983 featured an article by Sidney Blumenthal,
"How Lewis Lehrman Plans to Take Over America."

The Ford Foundation

After examining the lavishly funded network of pseudo-rightwing foundations, it is almost a
relief to go back to the forthright Marxist bias of the foundation movement, as exemplified
by the Ford Foundation. The Special Committee to Investigate Tax Exempt Foundation
reported in 1954:

"The Ford Foundation affords a good example of the use of a foundation to solve the
death tax problem, and, at the same time, the problem of how to retain control of a great
enterprise in the hands of a family. Ninety per cent of the ownership of the Ford Motor Co.
was transferred to the Ford Foundation, created for the purpose. Had it not been it was
almost certain that the family would have lost control."

The Ford family paid a terrible price to save the company. To prevent it from being split up,
they had to turn it over to the most leftwing elements in the U.S. Norman Dodd states that
while investigating tax exempt foundations, he interviewed H. Rowan Gaither, president of
the Ford Foundation. Gaither complained about the "bad press" the Ford Foundation was
receiving, and explained to Dodd:

"Most of us here were, at one time or another, active in either the OSS or the State Dept.,
or the European Economic Administration. During those times, and without exception, we
operated under directives issued by the White House, the substance of which was to the
effect that we should make every effort to alter life in the U.S. as to make possible a
comfortable merger with the Soviet Union."

This is still the goal of the foundation movement.

In 1953, the Ford Foundation set up the $15 million Fund for the Republic, with Paul
Hoffman, former head of ECA, married to Baruch's secretary, Anna Rosenberg. Directors
of the Fund were former Zionist and labor leader Arthur Goldberg, and Henry Luce, of
whom H.L. Mencken said, "I know why Henry hires so many Communists on his
magazines. It's because they work cheap."
The Fund for the Republic hired Earl Browder, head of the Communist Party "to study the
influence of Communism in contemporary America". In 1968, the Fund granted $215,000
to "promote in the U.S. the knowledge of contemporary Cuba. The funds will support the
expenses of persons invited by the Gastro government to do research in Cuba." The
National Guardian Jan. 13, 1968 pointed out that:

"The Ford Foundation plays a key part in financing and influencing almost all major civil
rights groups including Congress of Racial Equality, Southern Christian Leadership,
National Urban League, and NAACP."

The Ford Foundation has spent many millions to promote racial agitation and possible civil
war in America, completely polarizing the races. In this effort, it is simply carrying on the
plan inaugurated by the Rothschilds in 1865 with the Peabody Fund, the Slater Fund, and
later the General Education Board, which is now the Rockefeller Foundation. It takes
money to promote a civil war. Ford Foundation entered the Hispanic field by giving
$600,000 to the openly revolutionary Southwest Council of La Raza in 1968, and an
additional $545,717 in 1969. Congressman Henry Gonzalez, himself a Hispanic,
denounced La Raza as fomenting "blind, stupid hatred."

Ford money has backed many revolutionary groups in the U.S. engaged in dynamiting and
burning buildings, inciting riots, kidnaping and assassination. All of these are criminal
offenses but no one is ever arrested. The Ford Motor Co. also built the huge Kama River
truck factory in Soviet Russia, which provided the trucks for the Red Army to attack
Afghanistan. They rolled into the almost defenseless country on a modern highway, which
had been built by AID with American taxpayers' money.

The Ford Foundation has many capitalist and CIA connections. Stephen Bechtel and
Chase lawyer John J. McCloy have been board members for years, also Frank Abram,
chmn Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey. The president of the Ford Foundation is Franklin
Thomas, a token black; he is also director of the $348 million John Hay Whitney
Foundation. Whitney was Ambassador to England 1956-61, Order of the British Empire,
chairman Freeport Sulphur, publisher of the N.Y. Tribune; he married Betsy Cushing
Roosevelt. His daughter Kate married William Haddad of the New York Post, who set up
the Peace Corps for Kennedy in 1961, is governor of American Jewish Congress, Yale
Corp. and Museum of Modern Art. Other directors of J.H. Whitney Foundation include
Harold Howe, also director Ford Foundation; Vernon Jordan, director of Rockefeller
Foundation; and James F. Brownlee, partner of J.H. Whitney Co., and director Chase
Manhatten Bank, R.H. Macy Co. & chmn Minute Maid Corp.

Other directors of Ford Foundation include its European director, Ralf Dahrendorf, admirer
of Marx's "Utopian" policies. In his work, "Marx in Perspective", he claimed that Marx is the
greatest factor in the emergence of modern society. Dahrendorf was fellow of Center of
Advanced Study 1957-58, prof. sociology Hamburg, 1958-60, Columbia Univ. 1960, Univ.
of Tubingen 1960-64, Secretary of State Foreign Office Germany 1969-70. As a professor
of sociology, he created the concept of a "new man", whom he dubbed "homo
sociologicus", man transformed by Socialism, in which all distinctions of race, and
presumably, all other distinctions, have disappeared. Dahrendorf denies there are any
differences in the races of mankind, and denounces any idea of "superiority" or differing
skills as "ideological distortion". "Homo Sociologicus" is the creature of the social sciences,
the socialized man who can be completely controlled by the forces of society.

The Ford Foundation introduced "behaviourism" or people control into the curricula at
Harvard Business School through the director, Donald K. David, in 1956. David received a
$2 million grant from Ford Foundation for this program, while he was a director of the
foundation. In 1970, Ford Foundation established the Police Foundation, headed by Pat
Murphy, to train police in behaviourism and "human relations".

Other directors of Ford Foundation are Harriet S. Rabb, asst. dean Columbia U. Law
School, director of the NAACP Legal Fund since 1978. Her husband Bruce Rabb is
partner of the Wall Street law firm, Stroock Stroock & Lavan, organized the Lehrman
Institute and has been secretary of it since 1978. His father, Maxwell Rabb is also partner
of this law firm; he was adm. asst. Sen. Henry Cabot Lodge 1937-43, Secretary of the
Cabinet 1953-58 under Eishenower, joined Stroock Stroock & Lavan 1958, now
Ambassador to Italy, chmn U.S. delegation to UNESCO. Other partners of this firm are
William J. van den Heuvel, former law partner of Gen. Donovan, and his assistant when
he was Ambassador to Thailand, campaign manager Jimmy Garter 1976; Rita Hauser,
director Brookings Institution; and Robert B. Anderson former Secretary of Navy and
Secretary of Treasury. Stroock Stroock & Lavan specializes in handling the family finances
of wealthy old line Jewish families, and is trustee of all three Warburg foundations.

Chairman of the Ford Foundation is Alex Heard, who was with the War Dept. 1939-43,
spec. adviser President of the U.S. 1970, director Time since 1968. Other directors are:

       Hedley Donovan, editor in chief of Time, director of Trilateral Commission
       Walter A. Haas, president of Levi Strauss, director Bank of America, NAACP
        Legal Fund, chmn United Jewish Appeal, and Alliance Israelite Universelle
       Donald S. Perkins, of J.P. Morgan
       Irving S. Shapiro, former chairman DuPont, director of Citicorp and Citibank, IBM,
        director US-USSR Trade & Economic Council
       Glen E. Watt, of AFL-CIO, member Club of Rome, Trilateral Commission, Aspen
        Institute.

The Tavistock Institute

The purpose of the Pan-European Union, founded by Count Coudenhove-Kalergi, and
funded by the Rothschilds and Warburgs, was to restore the oligarchic control over
Europe. To accomplish this goal, it was necessary to emasculate and defeat the powerful
republican currents which had their origin in the 14th century Renaissance, which, with its
emphasis on the freedom of the human spirit, produced the greatest cultural outpouring in
the history of mankind. This individualism was immediately expressed in nationalism; its
republican spirit was dedicated to ending hereditary and arbitrary control and dictatorship
over the lives of the people, reaching its greatest expression in the Constitution of the
United States, which was the result of rebellion.

Because the ruling families of Europe are the direct descendants of William of Orange,
who chartered the Bank of England in 1694, the movement to destroy nationalism and
individualism has been directed from England, but expressed in the Communist movement.
The World Order has planned and executed two World Wars to restore world rule by the
oligarchy, a world rule variously called Bolshevism, the League of Nations, or the United
Nations, but never the World Order.

The English control of this world movement is demonstrated by the ideology of American
foundations, which is created by the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London. In
1921, the Duke of Bedford, Marquess of Tavistock, the 11th Duke, gave a building to the
Institute to study the effect of shellshock on British soldiers who survived World War I. Its
purpose was to establish the "breaking point" of men under stress, under the direction of
the British Army Bureau of Psychological Warfare, commanded by Sir John Rawlings-
Reese.
Tavistock Institute is headquartered in London, because its prophet, Sigmund Freud,
settled here in Maresfield Gardens when he moved to England. He was given a mansion
by Princess Bonaparte. Tavistock's pioneer work in behavioural science along Freudian
lines of "controlling" humans established it as the world center of foundation ideology. Its
network now extends from the University of Sussex to the U.S. through the Stanford
Research Institute, Esalen, MIT, Hudson Institute, Heritage Foundation, Center of
Strategic and International Studies at Georgetown where State Dept. personnel are
trained, US Air Force Intelligence, and the Rand and Mitre corporations. The personnel of
the foundations are required to undergo indoctrination at one or more of these Tavistock
controlled institutions. A network of secret groups, the Mont Pelerin Society, Trilateral
Commission, Ditchley Foundation, and Club of Rome is conduit for instructions to the
Tavistock network.

Tavistock Institute developed the mass brain-washing techniques which were first used
experimentally on American prisoners of war in Korea. Its experiments in crowd control
methods have been widely used on the American public, a surreptitious but nevertheless
outrageous assault on human freedom by modifying individual behaviour through topical
psychology. A German refugee, Kurt Lewin, became director of Tavistock in 1932. He
came to the U.S. in 1933 as a "refugee", the first of many infiltrators, and set up the
Harvard Psychology Clinic, which originated the propaganda campaign to turn the
American public against Germany and involve us in World War II. In 1938, Roosevelt
executed a secret agreement with Churchill which in effect ceded U.S. sovereignty to
England, because it agreed to let Special Operations Executive control U.S. polices. To
implement this agreement, Roosevelt sent Gen. Donovan to London for indoctrination
before setting up OSS (now the CIA) under the aegis of SOE-SIS. The entire OSS
program, as well as the CIA has always worked on guidelines set up by the Tavistock
Institute.

Tavistock Institute originated the mass civilian bombing raids carried out by Roosevelt and
Churchill purely as a clinical experiment in mass terror, keeping records of the results as
they watched the "guinea pigs" reacting under "controlled laboratory conditions". All
Tavistock and American foundation techniques have a single goal -- to break down the
psychological strength of the individual and render him helpless to oppose the dictators of
the World Order. Any technique which helps to break down the family unit, and family
inculcated principles of religion, honor, patriotism and sexual behaviour, is used by the
Tavistock scientists as weapons of crowd control. The methods of Freudian
psychotherapy induce permanent mental illness in those who undergo this treatment by
destabilizing their character. The victim is then advised to "establish new rituals of
personal interaction", that is, to indulge in brief sexual encounters which actually set the
participants adrift with no stable personal relationships in their lives, destroying their ability
to establish or maintain a family.

Tavistock Institute has developed such power in the U.S. that no one achieves
prominence in any field unless he has been trained in behavioural science at Tavistock or
one of its subsidiaries. Henry Kissinger, whose meteoric rise to power is otherwise
inexplicable, was a German refugee and student of Sir John Rawlings Reese at SHAEF.
Dr. Peter Bourne, a Tavistock Institute psychologist, picked Carter for President of the U.S.
solely because Carter had undergone an intensive brainwashing program administered by
Admiral Hyman Rickover at Annapolis. Paul Mellon's Old Dominion Foundation gave
Tavistock $97,000 in 1956, and $12,000 during each of the three following years. Old
Dominion also gave the Anna Freud Foundation $8000 a year. Tavistock maintains two
schools at Frankfort, birthplace of the Rothschilds: the Frankfurt School, and the Sigmund
Freud Institute.
The "experiment" in compulsory racial integration in the U.S. was organized by Ronald
Lippert, of the OSS and the American Jewish Congress, and director of child training at
the Commission on Community Relations. The program was designed to break down the
individual's sense of personal knowledge in his identity, his racial heritage. Through the
Stanford Research Institute, Tavistock controls the National Education Association. The
Institute of Social Research at the Natl Training Lab brain washes the leading executives
of business and government. Such is the power of Tavistock that our entire space
program was scrapped for nine years so that the Soviets could catch up. The hiatus was
demanded in an article written by Dr. Anatol Rapport, and was promptly granted by the
government, to the complete mystification of everyone connected with NASA. Another
prominent Tavistock operation is the Wharton School of Finance.

A single common denominator identifies the common Tavistock strategy -- the use of
drugs. The infamous MK Ultra program of the CIA, directed by Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, in
which unsuspecting CIA officials were given LSD, and their reaction studied like guinea
pigs, resulted in several deaths. The U.S. Government had to pay millions in damages to
the families of the victims, but the culprits were never indicted. The program originated
when Sandoz AG, a Swiss drug firm, owned by S.G. Warburg Co. of London, developed
lycergic acid. Roosevelt's advisor, James Paul Warburg, son of Paul Warburg who wrote
the Federal Reserve Act, and nephew of Max Warburg who had financed Hitler, set up the
Institute for Policy Studies to promote the drug. The result was the LSD "counter-culture"
of the 1960s, the "student revolution", which was financed by $25 million from the CIA.

[For more on the drug culture, see "The Aquarian Conspiracy" --ed]

One part of MK Ultra was the Human Ecology Fund; the CIA also paid Dr. Herbert Kelman
of Harvard to carry out further experiments on mind control. In the 1950s, the CIA financed
extensive LSD experiments in Canada. Dr. D. Ewen Cameron, president of the Canadian
Psychological Assn., and director of Royal Victorian Hospital, Montreal, received large
payments from the CIA to give 53 patients large doses of LSD and record their reactions;
the patients were drugged into weeks of sleep, and then given electric shock treatments.
One victim, the wife of a member of the Canadian Parliament, is now suing the U.S.
companies who provided the drug for the CIA. In his biography of Helms, Powers states
that in his last days of office, Helms ordered Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, head of MK Ultra, to
destroy all records of the CIA's drug-testing program, and that by Jan. 14, 1973, Helms
had destroyed five thousand pages of notes taken in his office during his six and a half
years as director of the CIA!

Because all efforts of the Tavistock Institute are directed toward producing cyclical
collapse, the effect of the CIA programs are tragically apparent. R. Emmett Tyrell Jr.,
writing in the Washington Post Aug. 20, 1984, cites the "squalid consequences of the 60s
radicals in SDS" as resulting in "the growing rate of illegitimacy, petty lawlessness, drug
addiction, welfare, VD, and mental illness". This is the legacy of the Warburgs and the CIA.
Their principal agency, the Institute for Policy Studies, was funded by James Paul
Warburg; its co-founder was Marcus Raskin, protege of McGeorge Bundy, president of the
Ford Foundation. Bundy had Raskin appointed to the post of President Kennedy's
personal representative on the National Security Council, and in 1963 funded Students for
Democratic Society (SDS), through which the CIA operated the drug culture.

Today, the Tavistock Institute operates a $6 billion a year network of foundations in the
U.S., all of it funded by U.S. taxpayers' money. Ten major institutions are under its direct
control, with 400 subsidiaries, and 3000 other study groups and think tanks which
originate many types of programs to increase the control of the World Order over the
American people. Typical is the Hudson Institute, a $5 million a year operation with 120
employees, founded in 1965 by Herman Kahn of the Rand Corp. and the Stanford
Research Institute; its directors include:

       Alexander Haig, president of United Technologies
       Frank Carlucci, deputy secretary of Defense, and now chairman Sears World
        Trade Corp.
       Daniel C. Searle, chmn G.D. Searle Drug Co.
       Gov. Pierre du Pont of Delaware.

The principal architect of Hudson was Frank Altschul, director of Ford Foundation, partner
of Lazard Freres, who married into the Lehman family, president General American
Investors, director U.S. Leather, International Bank te Amsterdam, American Eagle Fire
Insurance, the Yale Corp., Institute of International Studies, China Institute in America,
whose Times obituary in 1981 called him "a Renaissance Man" who endowed the Yale
Library and the Overbrook Press. Other Hudson associates are Leo Cherne of the Foreign
Advisory Intelligence Board, and Sidney Hook of the Hoover Institution.

Stanford Research Institute, adjoining the Hoover Institution, is a $150 million a year
operation with 3300 employees. It carries on program surveillance for Bechtel, Kaiser, and
400 other companies, and extensive intelligence operations for the CIA. It is the largest
institution on the West Coast promoting mind control and the behavioural sciences.

One of the key agencies as a conduit for secret instructions from Tavistock is the Ditchley
Foundation, founded in 1957 by Sir Philip Adams. A long time Foreign Service officer,
Adams was Minister to Khartoum 1959, Ambassador to Jordan 1966-70, and Egypt 1973-
75; he married the daughter of Baron Trevethin (the Lawrence family, which includes
several lord chief justices of Britain.)

The Ditchley Foundation is headquartered at Ditchley Park, near Oxford, in a castle built
for the Earl of Lichfield in the 16th century; the present Earl of Lichfield is a cousin of
Queen Elizabeth, and is known as a photographer of beautiful women. Ditchley Park was
given to the foundation by Ronald and Marietta Tree. Ronald Tree, a godson of Marshall
Field, was for many years a high official in British intelligence. He was appointed
Parliamentary Private Secretary to the Minister of Pensions, the Minister of Information,
and the Minister of Planning.

He was first married to Nancy Moncure Perkins, of an old Virginia family. They divorced,
and he married Marietta Peabody, granddaughter of Endicott Peabody, headmaster of
Groton, where the American elite was trained. Her career gave rise to the term "beautiful
people", the glittering international set devoted to leftwing causes. She began her career
as a beautiful young "hostess" for Nelson Rockefeller in 1942, became a shop steward for
the Newspaper Guild at Life Magazine, Fair Housing Practices Committee for New York,
1958 Volunteer for Stevenson, Commission on Human Rights at the U.N. 1959-61,
Human Rights Commission U.N. 1961-64, Ambassador to the U.N. 1961-64. Magazine
articles gave glowing reports of a "beautiful person's" life in New York, her townhouse at
123 E. 79th St. filled with antique furnishings and art treasures from Ditchley Park, the
house run faultlessly by an English butler, as well as their summer home at Barbados,
where they entertained Winston Churchill in 1960.

The American branch of the Ditchley Foundation is run by Cyrus Vance, former Secretary
of State, and director of the Rockefeller Foundation; Alan Pifer, president of the Carnegie
Foundation, and Winston Lord, president of the Council on Foreign Relations. Lord was
political and military officer at the Dept. of State 1961-64, international security officer
Defense Dept. 1969-73, spec. asst. to the President of the U.S. 1970-73, director of policy
planning at Dept. of State 1973-77, member of Atlantic Council and Atlantic Institute.
Other Ditchley members have been Wallace Sterling, president of Stanford University,
Richard Steadman of the German Marshall Fund, and Donald Perkins of Brookings
Institution. Perkins is a director of Time, Thyssen-Bornemitza, ATT, Corning, Cummins
Engine, Freeport Moran, G.D. Searle, and Morgan Guaranty Trust Bank, and chairman of
Jewel Tea Co.

One of the principal but little known operations of the Rockefeller Foundation has been its
techniques for controlling world agriculture. Its director, Kenneth Wernimont, set up
Rockefeller controlled agricultural programs throughout Mexico and Latin America. The
independent farmer is a great threat to the World Order, because he produces for himself,
and because his produce can be converted into capital, which gives him independence. In
Soviet Russia, the Bolsheviks believed they had attained total control over the people;
they were dismayed to find their plans threatened by the stubborn independence of the
small farmers, the kulaks. Stalin ordered the OGPU to seize all food and animals of the
kulaks, and to starve them out. The Chicago American Feb. 25, 1935 carried a front page
headline, "SIX MILLION PERISH IN SOVIET FAMINE: Peasants' Crops Seized, They and
their Animals Starve". To draw attention from this atrocity, it was later alleged that the
Germans, not the Soviets, had killed six million people, the number taken from the
Chicago American headline by a Chicago publicist.

The Communist Party, the Party of the Peasants and Workers, exterminated the peasants
and enslaved the workers. Many totalitarian regimes have found the small farmer to be
their biggest stumbling block. The French Reign of Terror was directed, not against the
aristocrats, many of whom were sympathetic to it, but against the small farmers who
refused to turn over their grain to the revolutionary tribunals in exchange for the worthless
assignats.

In the United States, the foundations are presently engaged in the same type of war of
extermination against the American farmer. The traditional formula of land plus labor for
the farmer has been altered due to the farmer's need for purchasing power, to buy
industrial goods needed in his farming operations. Because of this need for capital, the
farmer is especially vulnerable to the World Order's manipulation of interest rates, which is
bankrupting him.

Just as in the Soviet Union, in the early 1930s, when Stalin ordered the kulaks to give up
their small plots of land to live and work on the collective farms, the American small farmer
faces the same type of extermination, being forced to give up his small plot of land to
become a hired hand for the big agricultural soviets or trusts. The Brookings Institution
and other foundations originated the monetary programs implemented by the Federal
Reserve System to destroy the American farmer, a replay of the Soviet tragedy in Russia,
with the one proviso that the farmer will be allowed to survive if he becomes a slave
worker of the giant trusts.

Once the citizen becomes aware of the true role of the foundations, he can understand the
high interest rates, high taxes, the destruction of the family, the degradation of the
churches into forums for revolution, the subversion of the universities into CIA cesspools
of drug addiction, and the halls of government into sewers of international espionage and
intrigue. The American citizen can now understand why every agent of the federal
government is against him; the alphabet agencies, the FIB, IRS, CIA, and BATF must
make war on the citizen in order to carry out the programs of the foundations.

Summary
We have seen the close interlocking of the foundations with international banks and
corporations, all stemming from the Peabody Fund of 1865, and the War Industries Board
of Bernard Baruch in World War I. The foundations are in direct violation of their charters,
which commit them to do "charitable" work, because they make no grants which are not
part of a political goal. The charge has been made, and never denied, that the Heritage-
AEI network has at least two KGB moles on its staff. The employment of professional
intelligence operatives as "charitable" workers, as was done in the Red Cross Mission to
Russia in 1917, exposes the sinister political, economic and social goals which the World
Order requires the foundations to achieve through their "bequests".

Not only is this tax fraud, because the foundations are granted tax exemption solely to do
charitable work, but it is criminal syndicalism, conspiracy to commit offenses against the
United States of America, Constitutional Law 213, Corpus Juris Secundum 16.

For the first time, the close interlocking of the foundation "syndicate" has been revealed by
the names of its principal incorporators - Daniel Coit Gilman, who incorporated the
Peabody Fund and the John Slater Fund, and became an incorporator of the General
Education Board (now the Rockefeller Foundation). Gilman, who also incorporated the
Russell Trust in 1856, later became an incorporator of the Carnegie Institution with
Andrew Dickson White (Russell Trust) and Frederic A. Delano. Delano also was an
original incorporator of the Brookings Institution and the Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace. Daniel Coit Gilman incorporated the Russell Sage Foundation with
Cleveland H. Dodge of the National City Bank.

These foundations incorporators have been closely linked with the Federal Reserve
System, the War Industries Board of World War I, the OSS of World War II and the CIA.
They have also been closely linked with the American International Corporation, which
was formed to instigate the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. Delano, an uncle of Franklin
Delano Roosevelt, was on the original Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
in 1914. His brother-in-law founded the influential Washington law firm of Covington and
Burling.

The Delanos and other ruling families of the World Order trace their lineage directly back
to William of Orange and the regime which granted the charter of the Bank of England.
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother, Lady Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, is the
daughter of the 14th Earl of Sirathmore. When William of Orange invaded England in 1688,
the Scottish lords, who had been loyal to James II, were the last to capitulate. Patrick Lyon
took the oath of fealty to William in 1690, and became the first Earl of Strathmore. The
family resides at Glamis Castle, which was made famous by Shakespeare's play,
"Macbeth". The present Lord Glamis is Michael Fergus Bowes-Lyon, heir of the 17th Earl
of Strathmore, who holds additional titles of Earl of Kinghorne, Viscount Lyon, Farnedyce,
Sydlaw, and Strathdichtie.




Appendix I

After gaining control of the national government, the Rockefeller Foundation moved to
seize control of the state legislatures. The move began in Colorado, where the
Rockefellers had perpetrated the infamous "Ludlow Massacre" of workers at their
Colorado Fuel & Iron plant. State Senator Henry Wolcott Toll, a Denver lawyer and
graduate of Harvard Law School, spearheaded the organization of the American
Legislators Association in 1925. Time, April 27, 1936, noted that Toll in 1930 got financial
           aid from the Spelman Rockefeller Fund and moved the organization to the campus of
           Rockefeller's University of Chicago. Time noted:

           "Today the Capitol of the U.S. is still in Washington, but so far as the states individually
           have any point of contact, it is Mr. Toll's office building in Chicago. Presently Rockefeller
           money is to erect a $500,000 building on Chicago's Midway to house these secretariats, a
           sort of League of Nations Palace for the local governments of the 48 states."

           This became the Council of State Governments at 1313 60th St. Chicago, from which
           address the Rockefeller Foundation controlled the state legislatures and ramrodded their
           programs through mostly unsuspecting state bodies.

           Time also noted that Toll's plans were approved by a principal character in this story,
           Frederick A. Delano:

           "His sentiments were echoed with approval by Franklin Roosevelt's uncle, Frederick A.
           Delano, who, as chairman of the President's Committee on National Resources, was there
           to lend his advice."

           Thus we have the founder of the Brookings Institution guiding foundation control of the
           state legislatures. The Council of State Governments has now moved to Lexington,
           Kentucky, where it at present comprises the Conference of Chief Justices, Conference of
           State Court Administrators, and the National Associations of Attorney Generals,
           Secretaries of State and State Auditors, State Purchasing Offices, Lieutenant Governors,
           and State Legislators. The governors of the 50 states comprise the membership of the
           Council of State Governments.




http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/world_order/WorldCh07-4.htm




                                        by Brian Desborough
                                                 1999
                                           from Whale Website

                         Contents
                 Introduction
                 Social Engineering
                 Global warming
                 Wicca
                 The Illuminati
                 Who killed President Kennedy
                 Mind Control
                 Future Illuminati Plans
                 Notes and References
                    Return to Tavistock
                   Return to Mind Control
Introduction
With considerable media fanfare, ABC television news anchor Peter Jennings is promoting his new
                                                                    (1)
book, which is co-authored by ABC staff producer Todd Brewster.
Entitled "The Century for Young People", the lavishly-illustrated book, oriented toward children, purports
                                     th
to present a realistic overview of 20 century history.




In actuality, the book imparts the same misleading political spin on historical events as we have come to
expect from our Illuminati overlords, via their London-based command center known as the Royal
Institute of International Affairs, whose membership is composed of major media luminaries, bankers,
politicians, captains of industry, etc..

                           Thus, in placing the blame solely on the Japanese for the Pearl Harbour attack,
                           the book, which claims to have been extensively researched, fails to inform the
                           readers of the causal factors which led up to the attack. These included the
                           British-engineered downfall of Prime Minister Okuma and the Rockefeller-
                           instigated expulsion of Japan from her Chinese oilfield concessions.
                           As a congressional hearing chaired by then Senator Harry Truman revealed,
                           the Pearl Harbor attack was planned at the New England office of the
                           Rockefeller-funded Institute of Pacific Relations, not in Japan as is popularly
                           believed.
                           As a British cabinet minister stated before Parliament in 1944:
                           "Japan was provoked into attacking America at Pearl Harbor. It is a travesty on
                           history to say that America was forced into the war."
                           If the book authors had presented the true facts, perhaps America’s next
generation would realize that the Pearl Harbor attack was a payback episode for the egregious
intervention into Japan’s internal affairs of state perpetrated by the Rockefeller oil dynasty and its corrupt
                                  (2)
puppet Franklin D. Roosevelt.

In a similar manner, the book portrays photographs of Nazi atrocities, yet fails to mention that the Nazi
Party was created and funded by the City of London and Wall Street financiers, using George Bush’s
                          father as the bagman.
                                                 It does not comment on the fact that U.S. taxpayers
                                                 unwittingly funded the establishment of Hitler’s military,
                                                 or that Dr. Josef Mengele, the Auschwitz "Angel of
                                                 Death" was covertly brought to America at the
                                                 conclusion of W.W.II in order to implement
                                                 technologically-advanced mind-control techniques
                                                                                     (3)
                                                 upon many hapless Americans.

                                                    Books such as the one written by Jennings and
                                                    Brewster serve only to foster successive generations
                                                    of politically ill-informed cannon fodder, who
                                                    mindlessly engage in wars planned years in advance,
fought to enhance the                               aggrandizement of the Illuminati-controlled military-
industrial complex.
At the present time                                 NATO "peacekeepers" are active in more than one
hundred countries. True peace will not break out globally unless the next generation of children are
made aware of the false dogma ranging from geopolitics to the New Age movement, which deliberately
has been promulgated by Illuminati social engineers and media personnel.
As we are about to enter a new millennium, it is, perhaps, an opportune time to debunk many
misconceptions foisted upon us by a controlled media. This article is therefore oriented toward
teenagers, not adults, many of whom possess too rigid a belief structure to accept reality. It also will not
be viewed favorably by the majority of New Agers, who tend to ignore negative subjects.
Such denial is not only a sickness, it can also create negative karma. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqi
women and children have died because NATO forces destroyed that nation’s infrastructure during the
contrived Desert Storm war. This war would not have happened if people had learned to become
                                                              (4)
politically aware and to say no to Illuminati political hacks.

The following are some of the subjects which young people need to be informed about:
Back to Top

Social Engineering
When American evangelist E. Grandison (Charles) Finney (1792-1875) became a minister, his
sermons were delivered in a calm, unemotional manner. Unfortunately for the good shepherd, most of
his flock abandoned his ministry, never to return.

Realizing that he had to find a way to attract and maintain an enthusiastic congregation, Finney
discovered that if normal brain function is disturbed through major fear, shock or emotion, heightened
suggestibility and impaired judgment occur temporarily.
                             This facilitates the implanting of a new belief structure. Instead of appealing
                             to the intellect, Finney began to deliver sermons replete with copious
                             amounts of fire and brimstone, spoken in a loud, emotion-filled manner.
                             Cognizant that Finney had discovered a technique which turned previously-
                             rational people into mindless robots, other pastors adopted Finney’s
                             evangelical methods, which became known as the Boston Movement - the
                             foundation of today’s Fundamentalist Christian Church, exemplified in the
                             hysterical rantings and ravings of television evangelists, more intent upon
                             making a buck than in saving souls.

                              A classic example of the effectiveness of Finney’s behaviour-modification
                              techniques was the Children of God Church of the 1960’s, The church
                              pamphlets promoted paedophilia and sex between children. A
                              granddaughter of the cult’s founder alleges that she was made to have sex
                              with important government officials and had "met presidents from around the
                              world." The cult was protected by powerful political figures, including Chilean
                              dictator Pinochet.
The late movie actor River Phoenix revealed that as a child, he had been forced to have sex at the time
that his father was an archbishop of the Children of God Church. Shortly after some 170 children were
taken into protective following a police raid on a Children of God compound, River Phoenix died from a
purported drug overdose on Halloween night.
His body bore no needle marks. Was his death accidental, or was this a ritual murder perpetrated in
order to prevent him from revealing what he knew?

Finney’s method was adopted by the Tavistock Institute. Founded in London in 1922 as a psychological
warfare research center, it has developed into the central body responsible for the oversight of a global
mind-control network. The Institute realized that by means of repeated psychological shocks, or stressful
events, entire populations could be psychologically-controlled. This is achievable by providing a
controlled psychological environment.

                                                  Through its control of the Army psychiatric directorate,
                                                  Tavistock effectively controlled the British army during
W.W.II. At the conclusion of W.W.II, Tavistock began to establish a global network of psychiatric centers,
in order to influence the ideologies of mass populations.
This subversive network, which was funded primarily by the Rockefeller Foundation and large
corporations, included such establishments as the Stanford Research Institute, the U.S. Office of Naval
Research and the Science Policy Research Unit in England, the latter becoming a major force in the
development of social manipulation techniques, and has engaged in classified contract studies for
NATO.
It has become an accepted practice for high level NATO military personnel to be implanted with mind-
control programs.

It was JFK’s space program which sounded the economic death-knell for the Western nations. Until that
time, the geopolitical clout of Western nations primarily had been derived from the profits of the narcotics
trade and industrial growth. In 1963, NASA placed a contract with Tavistock to determine the effects of
the aerospace industry on Western society.
The Institute found that the space program had so ignited the imagination of the public, that the Western
world was in danger of becoming a technological society, replete with many free-thinkers. If allowed to
continue, this trend would cause the Illuminati to lose its dominance over the populace.

So alarmed were the Illuminati that they convened a conference in France; the conference concluded
that in order for the Illuminati movers and shakers to continue their dominion over the masses, the
populace of Western nations must be brainwashed into accepting the de-industrialization of their
countries. Deindustrialization was accomplished by culturally shocking the masses into accepting the
formation of vast environmental agencies staffed with parasitic bureaucrats.

Admittedly, some anti-pollution legislation is necessary, but the mountains of nebulous paper and
draconian penalties issuing forth from environmental agencies, has thrust the Western world into a
nearly-insolvent post-industrial era. Most of the global pollution arising from transportation and industry
readily could be eradicated through the implementation of proven over-unity (free-energy) devices, while
polluted rivers can be cleansed through the application of Schauberger vortexian technology. Not
surprisingly, environmental bureaucrats have repeatedly blocked the implementation of such devices for
fear of losing political clout.

The Tavistock Institute published a report in 1974 which revealed that environmentalist, New Age and
religious organizations are, in actuality, all part of a unified, planned social engineering conspiracy. At
the request of the Institute’s director, Dr. Willis Harmon, key elements of the report were published in
book form as The Aquarian Conspiracy by Harmon protégé Marilyn Ferguson.
The last thing that the Illuminati wants is a populace which thinks for itself, something most New Agers
fail to do, relying instead upon books and lectures promulgated by disinformers and kooks. The recent
New Age emphasis on angels, for instance, has only occurred because New Agers have failed to
                                                    (5)
determine the earthly origins of the angel myth.

In short, social engineering is an organized attempt by Illuminati front organizations to brain-wash the
global populace into accepting the destruction of national sovereignty, as a precursor to the
establishment of a global totalitarian government.
Back to Top

Global warming
According to the Chicken Little climatologists at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and
various environmental activists, carbon dioxide emissions from industrial sources are causing major
global warming, which in turn is causing a massive breakup of the Antarctic ice shelves.
To make matters worse, state these doomsayers, the year 2000 will usher in major solar activity,
resulting in failure of satellites and leaving cities without electrical power.

These dire predictions are merely another social engineering ploy aimed at further de-industrialization, in
order to achieve the Illuminati goal of reducing the global populace to mediaeval serfdom. This is why it
is incumbent upon you, dear reader, to conduct your own research, instead of leaving the task
to ’experts’ whose livelihood is in the hands of their Illuminati overlords.

These doomsayers are primarily basing their claims upon computer models, not upon empirical data. In
actuality, carbon dioxide is merely a secondary greenhouse gas - water vapor possessing twice the
greenhouse effect, even though it is being ignored in environmental studies. Water vapor and other
primary greenhouse gasses such as ozone, cause greenhouse warming when acted upon by solar
radiation. Since solar radiation is a variable, so global temperatures vary accordingly.
Another variable is the amount of water vapor present in the atmosphere; every minute, approximately
20 ice comets weighing about 100 tons apiece enter the earth’s atmosphere and vaporize, continually
adding to our planet’s water content.

Claims that we are in a global warming period are primarily based upon temperatures recorded by small
boxes known as Stevenson Screens; the majority of these are located in cities, where thermal radiation
from large expanses of asphalt and concrete result in temperatures higher than those encountered in
sparsely-populated areas. The system does not record oceanic temperatures. Since 75% of the planet’s
surface is covered by water and ice, a false impression is created from such recorded data.

A much more accurate depiction of global temperatures is provided by NOAA weather satellites, which
record temperatures of the lower atmosphere in a uniform planetary sweep. Nineteen years of data
recorded by NOAA reveals that little, or no global warming has occurred during this time period.

Solar activity occurs in approximately 11 year cycles. The present cycle began in May, 1996 and is
predicted to peak in the year 2000. Contrary to media reports, the present cycle has exhibited far less
solar activity than the two previous cycles.

The environmental doomsayers had a field day when a large iceberg broke away from the Antarctic ice
shelf and was attributed to global warming. A perusal of The American Navigator, which has recorded
iceberg activity since 1799, reveals that that particular iceberg was much smaller than ones sighted in
the past. In 1854, an iceberg was observed which was much larger; in 1927, an iceberg covered an area
of some 10,000 square miles, while an iceberg spotted in 1956 by an American icebreaker was 208
miles long by 60 miles wide.

The notion that CFC’s are responsible for the hole in the ozone layer at the South Pole is ludicrous,
since the hole was observed prior to the introduction of CFC’s. Moreover, CFC molecules are so heavy
that they sink into the soil, where they are consumed by anaerobic bacteria. Studies conducted at
China’s Changchun University suggest that solar high energy particles consume ozone over the
Antarctic.
CFC patents held by Dupont were about to expire, which would have permitted third world nations to
manufacture their own CFC’S, Dupont accordingly developed the flammable and toxic HCFC as a
replacement product and enlisted United Nations aid in imposing a global ban on the more efficient and
safe CFC’S, thereby providing Dupont with a new monopoly market and multi-billion dollar windfall
profits.
Back to Top

Wicca
Contrary to public belief, modern witchcraft is not of Celtic derivation, and is not associated with the Old
English word ’witan’ meaning "to know", or any word meaning "craft of the wise".
Wiccan covens are covertly controlled on behalf of the Illuminati by means of a United Nations
organization called Women’s International Collectives (WICCE); it interfaces with the Russian-directed
Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom and is associated in America with the
Revolutionary Communist Party, which was involved in precursor activities that culminated in the last
Los Angeles riot.

The Wicca tradition began with the Khwajagan-associated Bedouin tribe known as the Aniza.
The word "coven" is derived from their practice of performing rituals wearing winding sheets known as a
Kafan; their meetings were called an Az Zabat, from which we get "sabat". The cult’s sacrificial knife was
an Adh-dhamme, which gave rise to the wiccan "athame". Robin is a traditional wiccan name,
presumably derived from the name of the Aniza cult leader - Rabbans. The Aniza camel brand later
became known as the witches foot (the peace sign). The tribal totem was the goat.

Some of the cult migrated to Spain circa 1460, where some cult members came under the influence of
the malevolent Rabbi Isshaq Toledano, who persuaded them to cast spells against his enemies and
engage in blood rituals.
Back to Top

The Illuminati
The Illuminati is a very covert satanic cult which dominates global commerce and the military / industrial
complex. It’s hierarchy is composed of thirteen bloodline families whose ancestry is traceable back to
                                                  the Babylonian era.
                                                  All American presidents are bloodline (George W. Bush
                                                  and Vice-President Gore are the presidential candidates
                                                  with the strongest Illuminati bloodlines).

                                                The creature at the apex of the Illuminati pyramidal
                                                structure is a French Marquis, who bears the rank Pin
                                                d’Ar.
                                                He attends two human sacrifices in Orange County,
                                                California, each year; heads of state, politicians,
celebrities, military                           and law enforcement personnel have been observed at
these rituals.
Lesser Illuminati organizational bodies include,
      the Octagon
      the Grand Druid Council of Thirteen
      the Committee of Three Hundred
At the bottom of the pyramid are satanic lodges and covens, e.g. the British Pickengill coven and the
                       Wessex Lodge, the latter being the directors of the American Skull and Bones
                       Society.
                       An Illuminati sub-group is the Sovereign Order of the Dragon, which controlled the
                       evil Egyptian priesthood and whose later members included Dracul, the father of
                       Vlad the lmpaler (Dracula).
                           th
                       A 19 century letter which used to be displayed in the British Museum, was
                       written by the Illuminist Albert Pike. It details three world wars planned by the
                       Illuminati.
                       It accurately described the last two World Wars and claims the next one will be
                       initiated by provoking religious differences between Jew and Arab (probably
                       through destruction of the Islamic mosque situated adjacent to Jerusalem’s Dome
                       of the Rock).
The remaining global powers will choose sides and fight themselves to a standstill, and destroy each
other’s economic and religious institutions.
Out of the chaos will arise a totalitarian New World Order and a new religion which embraces Lucifer
(the new global religion is currently being composed under the direction of industrialist Maurice Strong,
at a remote retreat in Crestone County, Colorado).
Back to Top

Who killed President Kennedy
Jennings’s book claims that Lee Harvey Oswald was the perpetrator and ignores evidence to the
contrary.
The person charged with the crime was two inches shorter than the Oswald who went to Russia: he was
probably a Latvian Oswald double named Al Hidell. It is not possible to fire a rifle without receiving
powder residue on the cheek, yet "Oswald’s" paraffin test proved negative - case closed.

The assassination was directed by British Intelligence operative Major Louis Bloomfield, c.e.o. of the
Permindex Corporation. Clay Shaw and Roy Cohn were directors of Permindex.
The actual assassination was perpetrated by members of the Defense Industrial Security Command (the
military / industrial complex security arm) and FBI sharpshooters, the supervisor of the FBI team posing
as treasurer of a Pasadena church. According to intelligence sources, Kennedy’s head wound was
caused by a radio-controlled shaped charge of explosive located under John Connally’s jump seat (the
explosion was visible in the original uncut version of the Zapruder film).
At least one member of a psy-ops team was present in order to momentarily mentally misdirect the
attention of the President’s wife away from the blast source, It is a matter of record that the limo’s interior
was removed and replaced by a new one within 24 hours, presumably in order to dispose of the
explosive’s firing mechanism.

In a private communication with the writer, a crewmember of Kennedy’s Air Force One aircraft claimed
that the mortally-wounded president was covertly transported to Bethesda Naval Hospital, and died the
following spring. The autopsy photograph’s are of slain police officer and Kennedy look-alike J.D. Tippet.
Prime motives for the assassination were the president’s intent to federalize the Federal Reserve and
his planned cessation of the Vietnam war, which would have meant cancellation of an $11 billion
contract to the Bechtel Corporation for the construction of a naval base (Lady Byrd Johnson was
allegedly a major Bechtel stockholder).
Back to Top

Mind Control
In its coverage of "Unabomber" Ted Kaczynski, the Jennings’s book omits the most important aspect of
the case: Kaczynski had been a volunteer for a CIA-funded MK-ULTRA mind-control project at Harvard
University.
The writer, who has assisted in the de-programming of mind-control survivors, invariably finds that
                                                                                         (6)
persons charged in bombings or multiple shootings, are victims of mind-control projects.

It has been customary for the offspring of Illuminati initiates to be programmed in order to perpetuate the
organization. Mind-control techniques were elevated to a new scientific level during W.W.II by the
Auschwitz "Angel of Death" Joseph Mengele, who subjected infants to prolonged intense torture, in
order to force the minds of the hapless children to split into several thousand alter personalities.
At the conclusion of W.W. II, Mengele was covertly brought to the United States under Operation
Paperclip, and established mind-control facilities at various Federal facilities, including China Lake Naval
Weapons Facility and later at Area 51.

Typical trauma induced in infants at these facilities included limb dislocation, sexual abuse and forced
observation of the execution of "expendable" children. Many mind-control victims are the offspring of
multi-generational satanic cult families, while others are the children of military fathers who knowingly
                          permit their children to become mind-control victims in order to further their
                          own careers.
                          Numerous child-care centers are involved in satanic cult and mind-control
                          activity.

                          Sadly, such evil activity is protected by the Illuminati-controlled media, which
                          declines to expose it, yet highlights the disinformation spewed forth from the
                          False Memory Syndrome Foundation. This insidious foundation was
                          established to discredit claims of ritual sexual abuse and mind control, insisting
                          that such claims are the result of false memories.
Significantly, prominent members of this organization have included CIA-funded mind-control
researchers such as the late Dr. Jolyon West, and supporters of pedophilia, including self-admitted
pedophile Harold Merksey. Foundation member Dr. Ralph Underwager was forced to resign after it was
publicly revealed that he advocated sex between adults and children, claiming that it was "An
acceptable expression of God’s will for love", during an interview with the Danish pedophile magazine
Paedika.

Membership of the foundation is interlocked with that of the Committee for the Investigation of Claims of
the Paranormal (CSICOP), an organization which debunks the proven free-energy research of such
luminaries as Nobel Prize nominee Nikola Tesla.
A board member of CSICOP is Professor Paul Kurtz, chairman of Prometheus Books, which publishes
books describing pedophile encounters. Its human sexuality editor is CSICOP member Professor Vern
Bullough, who is also a board member of Paedika.

Typical media suppression of the truth concerning ritual sexual abuse and mind control (sexual abuse
provides the trauma which causes the mind to dissociate) occurred during press coverage of the
McMartin Preschool trial. Claims of false memories were highlighted, yet key evidence suggestive that
ritual sexual abuse had, indeed occurred, was downplayed or ignored.

One day in 1976, the unconscious body of rape victim Karen Klass was discovered in her Huntington
Beach home. She was the ex-wife of Righteous Brothers’ vocalist Bill Medley; she died from her injuries
five days later. Her young son attended the McMartin Preschool.

Her death was investigated by Hermosa Beach Chief Detective Paul Bynum, whose investigative
records later mysteriously disappeared.
He later became a private detective. In 1984, members of the McMartin Preschool staff received
indictments after a grand jury heard allegations from preschoolers that they had been taken from the
school by means of tunnels, sexually molested, then forced to watch as school staff killed turtles and
animals, informing the children as they did so that the same fate would happen to them and their
families if they spoke about the sexual abuse.
Shortly after the indictments had been handed down, Gerald Klass, the husband of the slain Karen
Klass, was killed when he drove his car over a cliff. The Hermosa police allegedly made no attempt to
determine whether the Klass deaths and the McMartin indictments were interrelated.

The attorney for indicted McMartin staff member Raymond Buckey retained the services of the
previously-mentioned Paul Bynum.
After viewing the videotaped interviews of the preschoolers, Bynum concluded that the children had
indeed been sexually abused at the school. Curiously, when police arrested Buckey, Bynum’s missing
investigative records were discovered on Buckey’s desk.

Bynum was ordered to testify at Buckey’s trial. On the morning he was scheduled to testify, Bynum was
found dead from a gunshot wound. Although his death was ruled a suicide, the Manhattan Beach weekly
newspaper the Easy Reader stated that Bynum’s close friends couldn’t think of any reason why he
would commit suicide. Could it be that he was murdered because it became known that he had
unearthed animal bones and turtle shelf fragments on a vacant lot adjacent to the preschool, thus
corroborating the children’s claims of seeing the killing of turtles and animals?

The first parent to question the possibility of sexual molestation at the McMartin Preschool was Judy
Johnson, who alleged that her son returned home from the preschool with a bleeding anus. After going
public with her suspicions she purportedly received threats and believed that she was being poisoned.
                           The writer is personally aware of several instances in which offices of
                           therapists involved in the treatment of victims of sexual abuse and mind-control
                           have been broken into and sprayed with pesticide. He is also cognizant of one
                           mind-control survivor who was hospitalized for ten days after her apartment
                           was unlawfully entered in her absence and sprayed with diazinon pesticide.
Judy Johnson was allergic to alcohol. After becoming the target of ridicule, she began drinking and died
from alcoholic poisoning. Other preschool parents filed complaints after their infants not only spoke of
sexual abuse, but also contracted the sexually-transmitted disease known as Chlamydia.
The tunnels beneath the school through which the children claimed to have been taken, were not in
evidence at the commencement of the police investigation. Fearing that they had been filled in to
conceal evidence of criminal activity, the parents engaged the services of Ted Gunderson, the former
FBI Chief of Station, Los Angeles, to search for traces of tunnels.

Realizing that a hostile press might criticize him for a lack of an archaeological background, Mr.
Gunderson wisely enlisted the aid of five earth scientists and forensic geologists from major universities.
The McMartin case had become the butt of media ridicule after District Attorney Ira Reiner, without
bothering to have the area beneath the school excavated, declared that the children’s accounts of
tunnels were false (Reiner allegedly was the protégé of then State Attorney General John Van de
Camp. According to the Executive Intelligence Revue, much of the State Attorney’s campaign funding
had been provided by the pornography industry).

As Gunderson’s team of professionals commenced excavations at the spot that a former preschooler
claimed had been a tunnel entrance, the Los Angeles Times began a series of articles ridiculing the
effort. When the excavation team did, in fact, not only discover a tunnel, but also turtle shells and the
bones of more than two hundred animals, the newspaper ended its snide articles with a single-
paragraph statement which tersely stated that "evidence" of tunnels had been revealed. Why did the
Times not report on further excavations of the tunnel system?

In a private conversation with this writer, Mr. Gunderson stated that one tunnel terminated beneath a
trapdoor in the bathroom floor of an adjacent triplex. As excavations proceeded, facilitated by a survey
conducted by geophysicist Robert Beer with the aid of an electromagnetic scanner, it was found that the
roots of an avocado tree had been cut with a saw in order to clear a path for the tunnel. This disproves
the media claim that the tunnel system, which extended for approximately sixty feet, was the work of a
large animal.

Initially, seven members of the McMartin staff had been indicted in 1984 by a grand jury which had been
ordered by Reiner’s predecessor, Robert Philobosian, following an intensive investigation which
included interviews with about four hundred children. The children alleged that Satanic rituals, which
involved sexual molestation, occurred in the tunnels and at other locations. Commonality in the
description of the alleged rituals given by the interviewed children was noted by the investigators, who
concluded that at least forty-one of the children had been sexually molested.

The McMartin defendants were charged with the sexual molestation of not less than eighteen infants
over a period of ten years, accompanied by the making of death threats in order to prevent the children
from talking. In January, 1986, newly-elected District Attorney Reiner declared that the evidence was
insufficient to try five of the defendants and charges against them were dropped.
Only Peggy McMartin Buckey and her son Raymond were brought to trial. The trial began in 1987 and
ended in 1990 with the acquittal of Mrs. Buckey, which is surprising since she testified that she was only
employed by the preschool for a few weeks; this is contradicted by payroll records which indicate that
she worked at the school for several years. The judge declared a mistrial in the case involving Raymond
Buckey.
At a press conference held at the conclusion of the second trial, the jury members were unanimous in
agreeing that sexual molestation had taken place at the school, but could not prove that Raymond
Buckey was the perpetrator.

Raymond Buckey was tried for a second time in 1990, and again acquitted due to a hung jury. Thus
ended the longest and costliest criminal proceedings in American history. Perhaps the outcome would
                                                                                              (7)
have been different had Ira Reiner introduced as evidence the discovery of the tunnel System.

Not surprisingly, the news media, which initially gave massive coverage to debunking the children’s
allegations, suddenly found the affair not newsworthy upon discovery of the tunnels, and pulled their
reporters off the case. Was this because the children had claimed that many of their sexual perpetrators
were famous politicians, film stars and sports figures? If this sounds improbable, the reader’s attention is
drawn to the fact that the writer is aware of mind-controlled survivors who claim that they were used in
kiddieporn movies made at the ranch of a well-known movie director.

The media (including the New York Times) gave considerable coverage to the pernicious debunking of
the preschooler’s credibility delivered by Debbie Nathan, an advocate for the pedophile-associated
False Memory Syndrome Institute.
She claimed that there is no evidence that ritual sexual abuse ever occurred at the McMartin Preschool
and that the tunnel excavation was a hoax.




In view of the fact that the tunnel’s entrance and route were exactly where the children claimed it would
be found, the presence of turtle and animal bones, clinical evidence of trauma to the genital area caused
by a blunt object, and an outbreak of sexually-transmitted Chlamydia, it would appear that Ms. Nathan is
either suffering from an acute case of myopic vision, or is a disinformer for the intelligence community.

For decades, the Illuminati-controlled intelligence agencies have inflicted satanic ritual abuse on infants
for the purpose of creating mind-controlled sex slaves. The hapless children (known in the intelligence
community as Black Widows) are then used to entrap and blackmail heads of state, politicians,
bureaucrats and entertainment celebrities. Until 1960, mind-control programming of children was
primarily conducted within facilities owned by the intelligence agencies.
Fearing exposure, a network of preschools and orphanages was established by the intelligence
agencies as a cover, throughout the United States and Europe. This network includes numerous
religious daycare centers, administrated by Satanists posing as pillars of the religious community.

If parents reading this article believe that satanic practices could never occur at the preschool attended
by their infants, think again. Space does not permit an in-depth expose of the pervasiveness of this
diabolical state of affairs, but one case intensively researched by the writer may serve to exemplify the
problem.
It involved a mother who had been born into a multi-generational family of Satanists; she was
genetically-bred to possess outstanding psychic abilities, in order to officiate at high-level Illuminati
rituals and also to become a member of the Janus psy-ops assassination group. Because of her
background, she was subjected to appalling trauma and mind-control programming at the hands of
Joseph Mengele, for the first nineteen years of her life.

Her mind-control programming began to break down after the death of Mengele in 1989, and began
recovering memories of attending Illuminati rituals involving dignitaries and members of the European
nobility. This writer has personally observed many hours of video-taped interviews of her conducted by a
psychiatrist while she was under the influence of sodium amytol.
During these sessions, she named perpetrators who had sexually abused her as a child. One of the
names was of a person known by the writer to be the head of the Illuminati High Council of the United
States.

Upon recovering her memories she realized that if Mengele had taken her to observe numerous
Illuminati rituals in Europe as part of her training, there would have been major lapses in her school
attendance. Seeking verification, she found that all her grade-school records were missing. Suspecting
that her daughter, aged six, had been sexually abused, she had her interviewed separately by a
psychiatrist, a psychologist and a therapist.
All concluded and signed statements that she had been sexually abused.
The child informed the psychiatrist that her father was the perpetrator. The child was then interviewed by
a policewoman, who then informed the mother that the daughter had disclosed that her father was
sexually-abusing her. The detective (a freemason) assigned to the case refused to press charges,
claiming that it is wrong to imprison a man for sixteen years on a child’s testimony.
When the mother protested, she received a threatening letter from the police chief. She then attempted
to place the matters in the hands of Child Protective Services, who declined to take appropriate action in
spite of the therapists’ affidavits. The writer has heard several claims by sexual abuse victims that a
national satanic network exists within the Child Protective Services system.

The father filed for divorce following his wife’s memory recall of satanic rituals and family involvement in
them; years of intense torture and trauma had taken its toll and she was hospitalized before the divorce
became final. While in hospital, her husband served her with an eviction notice and she was given
twelve hours to remove her personal effects from her own home.

To make matters worse, a family court commissioner ignored the sworn affidavits of the therapists,
which had been entered into the court records under oath, and awarded, sole legal custody of her
children to her husband. He also ordered her to pay $12,000 to her husband’s attorney, curiously, this
was the exact sum she had received in her divorce settlement, thus rendering her penniless and
homeless.

This is not an isolated case. Every mind-control survivor that the writer has encountered, has been
made penniless as soon as they recovered memories and severed contact with their handler.
Presumably this is an Illuminati ploy to force the hapless victim back into the system. A recent perusal of
the court records appertaining to the above case revealed that the commissioner unlawfully omitted to
enter the therapists’ affidavits into the case file.
Considering her elevated Illuminati status, could it be that he was in collusion with the Illuminati, who
ordered him to deprive her of her beloved children, in an attempt to force her to return to the fold? She
claims that her ex-husband has told her that she can see her daughter again if she does the Illuminati’s
bidding. Significantly, he works for a person who attends gatherings at the notorious Bohemian Grove.

Shortly prior to the custody hearing, the office of the psychiatrist who had examined the woman’s
daughter was burgled. The only item stolen was this woman’s case file.
The psychiatrist, Dr. Daniel Scheile, who was conducting a study of mind-control survivors was then
incarcerated in a psychiatric facility for two weeks. On the day of his release, he was found hanged in
his garage; his death was ruled a suicide. Presumably in an attempt to terrorize the woman into
returning to the Illuminati, she was shown a video of Dr. Scheile being suffocated, then hanged by three
men and a women. She identified one of the perpetrators as her husband’s attorney; the other three had
attended the custody hearing and had later been observed in the company of her husband.

According to Dr. Scheile’s autopsy report, he weighed more than two hundred pounds and was hanged
with a ligature measuring 3/8 ths. inches in diameter. No tracheal damage was sustained. The writer
recently showed the report to a doctor who was experienced in forensic pathology. He concluded that it
was impossible for such a heavy person to be hanged with such a thin ligature without resultant tracheal
damage.

Prior to losing custody, her daughter told the woman about a "bad room" in the upper floor of the
Christian daycare center which she attended in Anaheim, California. The chaplain at the school is also a
police chaplain. The woman remembers seeing him, accompanied by his police chief, at Illuminati
satanic rituals held in the crypt of a church at nearby Longbeach.

The chaplain was also a close friend of the music teacher at a school attended by her then ninth-grade
son. Upon her son joining the school band, the teacher took the band on a weekend trip to a camp in the
San Bernardino mountains. The boy claims that he was awakened in the middle of the night and forced
to attend an initiation ritual, in which he was made to sit in the middle of a circle, together with other new
band members. They were surrounded by band members clad in hooded black robes, who were
chanting and holding candles. This practice, which smacks of occultism, was terminated following the
mother’s formal complaint to the school principal.

Awarding custody of the mother’s children to the father despite the findings of three professional
therapists and a policewoman is not simply aberrant behaviour - it is an act of the most diabolical evil,
and exemplifies the foul stench which pervades the judicial system throughout America and Western
Europe.

Therefore let us conclude this brief overview of a typical mind-control survivor’s life with an verbatim
excerpt from the psychologist’s report on her three interviews she had with the mother’s daughter:
"Don’t let me go back to my Daddy. He hurts me. Daddy touches me between the legs. Daddy touches
my private parts. Don’t let me go back there. I’m not safe with Daddy... [crying]... It isn’t safe with Daddy.
He hurts me. I want my Mommy. I want to be safe."
The psychologist diagnosed dissociative personality disorder and all three therapists referred the case to
the Child Protective Services, who refused to take action.
During the period when she was conducting the interviews, the psychologist received threatening phone
calls, underwent vehicular harassment and discovered that her office had been broken into, sprayed
with pesticide and the rug smeared with animal excrement. She no longer handles cases involving
sexual abuse or mind control.
          th
On April 7 , 1997, a friend of the writer attended a banquet in Washington, D.C., hosted by members of
the Eastern Establishment. He overheard the daughter of a well-known New York banking family
speaking about the woman referred to in the above case. She told her friends that they had to punish
the woman by taking away her children, because she was refusing to do their bidding.
And this is the land of the free? The woman has not been able to see her daughter since the custody
hearing six years ago, and was unable to meet her son again until he was nineteen years old. She now
has an excellent rapport with him and he visits her regularly.

After a child has developed a multiple personality following induced trauma, the programmer assigns an
access code to each alter personality, which is then programmed for a specific task, e.g. to be a sex
slave, assassin or drug courier. A network of microchip implants is often embedded in the victim. Many
of these are powerful microprocessors composed of synthetic protein, rendering them undetectable by
means of X-rays. Programs are reinforced by means of "triggers" inserted into television programs. A
major trauma-based mind-control program is known as Monarch; Monarch programmed multiples are
often used as assassins or to perform tasks for the Illuminati.

Many children are programmed to serve as sex slaves for pedophile politicians and heads of state; as
the JonBenet Ramsey investigative team is well aware, the case includes aspects of possible mind-
control and cult activity.
The name "JonBenet" is very similar to an Illuminati term for the Devil - "Jonbet".




As usual, the corporate media has gone to great lengths to divert public awareness in the Ramsey case
away from the possibility that this was a satanic ritual sacrifice, not the work of a lone intruder.
There are anomalies in the case which have been ignored by the media establishment: forensic
evidence of regular sexual penetration by a male adult, failure to notify the public the nature of the
biological fluid found on and near JonBenet’s body, and the remarkable similarity between the ransom
note and the handwriting of John Ramsey.
    And what about the claims of investigative journalists that John Ramsey’s company, Access
        Graphics (now owned by Lockheed Martin) was linked to the kiddieporn industry, and had
        alleged connections with Amsterdam’s red light area?
    Was it just a coincidence that the Ramsey’s much publicized press conference was held on May
          st
        1 , which is Beltaine in the occult calendar?
    Or that the child’s death occurred on a night that the Illuminati conduct their sacrificial ritual
        known as The Last Bulb on the Christmas Tree?
The close relationship between the Boulder District Attorney and the law firm hired by the Ramsey’s,
eventually forced the Boulder police to withhold evidence from the D.A.’s office.
Shortly afterwards, the police computers were hacked into.

It is commonplace for the Illuminati to create mother / daughter mind-controlled teams of sex slaves for
the purpose of entrapping public figures. Patsy Ramsey appears to exhibit symptoms of alter personality
switching during media interviews. Could it possibly be that Mrs. Ramsey and her daughter were both
mind-controlled sex slaves? If so, Mrs. Ramsey’s front alter genuinely would have no knowledge of the
crime.

                 In her book, mind-controlled sex slave Cathy O’Brien describes how she and her infant
                 daughter were sexually abused by American presidents and congressional members
                 (other mind-control survivors also name the same alleged perpetrators).
                 She alleges that one of her mind-control handlers was one of congress’s most powerful
                                                                               (8)
                 political figures - West Virginia senator Robert Byrd (left).

                   Senator Byrd has also been named as a driving force behind the creation of admitted
                   satanist Lt. Colonel Michael Aquino’s Temple of Set. Aquino has been a member of
                   the Psychological Warfare Division of the Defense Intelligence Agency.
                   An advocate of mind-control, Aquino wrote an article published in the Military Review,
in which he stated:
" ...we shall create MindWar. The term is harsh and fear-inspiring, and so it should be: It is a term of
               attack and victory... ".
               Aquino (right) was also the focus of alleged child molestation at San Francisco’s Presidio
               Child Development Center; he was not charged following military intervention in the case,
               despite the fact that children accurately described his bedroom.
                                       th
             On the night of August 9 1991, investigative journalist Danny Casolaro purportedly
             committed suicide by performing the miraculous feat of slashing his wrists after severing the
             tendons in both arms. Casolaro had been in the process of writing a book about
             government corruption and had informed colleagues that one chapter involved Senator
             Byrd. Allegedly, he had arranged a clandestine meeting with one of Byrd’s staff members
that evening.

Irresponsible journalism is reprehensible, but in view of the botched Ramsey case, the above-described
allegations of possible misconduct by Byrd, and the fact that Patsy Ramsey is a former Miss West
Virginia, has anyone investigated whether a mind-control connection exists between Mrs. Ramsey and
the senator, and whether any public figures were at the Ramsey residence at the time of the murder?

Operation Greenstar is a mind-control program in which the victim is given a screen memory to create
the impression of being abducted by extraterrestrials. This is accomplished by placing on the victim’s
head a helmet containing electromagnetic solenoids tuned to a 4 Hz. frequency.
The solenoids are connected to a computer which projects into the percipient’s mind a graphics program
depicting an alien abduction scenario. Such victims are subjected to Janus ’end times’ programming,
                       and will be activated to create civil unrest shortly prior to declaration of a state of
                       national emergency. Hypnotic regression as practiced by UFO support groups,
                       only serves to reinforce the mind-control programs.
                       A number of day-care centers are used for both mind-control programming and
                       satanic ritual abuse purposes, while a major religious organization serves as a
front for the programming of schoolyard shooters.

Some children of Illuminati parents are genetically-bred to be outstanding psychics. These victims are
trained to perform as psychic assassins, possessing the capability of causing cardiac arrest or neural
dysfunction. Former Soviet Premier Yuri Andropov was assassinated in this manner. A major psy-ops
team is known as Janus; it is directed from the NATO headquarters in Belgium. Another high-level psy-
ops assassination team is composed of very intelligent African-American women, known as the Black
Angels.

It is estimated that there are between two and ten million mind-controlled victims in the United States.
Victims are usually programmed to slash their arms if their front alter personality begins to recover
memories of the programming; this inhibits further memory recovery (victims occasionally begin to
recover memories if their programmer or handler dies).
Buford Furrow, recently arrested for the shooting at the Jewish Community Center, in Granada Hills,
California, was admitted to a psychiatric institution last year after slashing his arm in several places,
consistent with mind control activity. Significantly, a National Security Council E. Mail address for a
Buford Furrow at McChord Air Force base was deleted the day after his arrest. His father is a retired
career Air Force Master-Sergeant.

Federal prosecutors have announced that they will seek the death penalty against Mr. Furrow.
"Based on the facts as we know them to be, it is our view that the death penalty is warranted in this
case," remarked U.S. Attorney Alejandro N. Mayorkas.
The facts, Mr. Mayorkas, are that Buford Furrow has exhibited the classic symptoms of a mind-
controlled victim.
If you haven’t bothered to ascertain that this is so, or if you subjected the accused to a psychiatric exam
by a person possessing a high security clearance (usually the case in such shootings or bombings) then
you and your cohorts are incompetent, and should resign. If, as the writer believes, the accused is
indeed a mind-controlled assassin, and you are cognizant of the fact, then you are an accessory to
murder. The more than one million people who will read this article in the newspaper and on the internet
will be observing your actions.

For the enlightenment of Mayorkas, and others of his bureaucratic ilk, perhaps it is timely to point out
that the Illuminati has remained the overlords of humankind for millennia by virtue of the veil of extreme
secrecy with which they surround themselves. Any person who incurs public exposure while performing
an unlawful act on behalf of the dragon, invariably discover themselves experiencing the last day of the
rest of their life.

In order to condition the public into supporting stricter gun-control measures, mind-controlled children
have been programmed to shoot classmates. One of the Columbine High-School shooters, Eric Harris,
used to live at Plattsburg Air Force Base, in New York State, with his Air force officer father. At the age
of ten, Harris allegedly used to complain to his friends that he was being drugged at the base.
This base, although officially closed, is known to possess an enormous underground facility, which
allegedly is still being used as a mind-control programming center. One Columbine teacher has publicly
stated that she was wounded by an adult male, not a student (intelligence information received by the
writer claims that four adult gunmen were involved). One wonders why a contingent of Federal
personnel purportedly visited the school the day prior to the massacre.

Mind-control victims often display symptoms of obsessive compulsive disorder, resulting from prolonged
trauma abuse, as is the case with Harris, which should have served as a red flag to members of the
investigative team. Prosecutors who secure convictions in such cases, where evidence of mind-control
exists, are either incompetent researchers or complicit members of a conspiracy; the principal function
of a prosecutor is to insure that justice is served, not to obtain a guilty verdict at any cost.

Since space is limited, perhaps an overview of the Jonestown massacre will serve to depict the massive
extent to which mind-control is used by corrupt Federal agencies.
Jonestown was a CIA experiment to determine whether it was possible to establish a large mind-
controlled slave labor force. Jim Jones was a CIA operative and former Housing Commissioner for San
Francisco. Ukiah District Attorney Tim Stone was assigned the task of procuring state mental patients
and transferring their guardianship to the Peoples Temple. Assisting Jones was former police chief Dan
Mitrioni, a contract CIA operative, who previously had instructed Brazilian and Bolivian security
personnel in advanced torture interrogation techniques.

In 1973, CIA operative George Blakey made the initial $650,000 deposit for the Guyana People’s
Temple property. Blakey’s father-in law, Dr. Lawrence Layton, was the director of an U.S. Army
Chemical Warfare research laboratory, which received a contract to conduct research appertaining to
the MK-ULTRA mind-control project.
Contrary to media reports, very few of the Jonestown victims died from poisoned Kool-Aid. The majority
of the victims were allegedly sprayed with a sleeping gas discharged from helicopters, prior to being
shot or strangled (reminiscent of the Arab / Israeli Six Day’s War, in which Arab troops were subjected to
aerial spraying of L.S.D. by Israeli aircraft, prior to being bombed).

Prior to the purchase of the Guyana property, the entire staff of the Mendocino State Mental Hospital
were dismissed and replaced by Jim Jones’s personnel. According to mind-control survivors, Josef
Mengele programmed inmates there, at that time period. One member of Jones’s staff at Mendocino
was allegedly the mother of O.J. Simpson. Perhaps this explains why one psychologist, very
experienced in observing mind-control survivors, noted that during Simpson’s trial, he displayed
symptoms of alter-personality switching.

Simpson’s trial, which served to polarize the races, left more questions than answers. Why wasn’t the
name of Al Cowling’s employer, the notorious drug dealer Joey Ippolito, not mentioned during the trial,
particularly since he was an associate of a known CIA and Guatemalan death squad hit-man, whose
M.O. is to torture his victims with a stiletto prior to slashing their throats?
Ippolito "escaped" from a minimum security prison only three weeks prior to the murder of Simpson’s ex-
wife. A Loyola-Marymount University law professor has publicly claimed that in addition to having a
Simpson blood sample on his person for three hours, a detective also obtained a sample of Nicole
Brown-Simpson’s blood from the morgue and had it in his possession for 24 hours. Why was blood not
observed on Simpson’s socks until several days after the murder? Was the cut on Simpson’s left index
finger the result of mind-control memories? If the cut was incurred during the slayings, why did his left-
hand bloody glove not have a corresponding cut?

Former Florida State Attorney Dick Gerstein was investigated for allegedly laundering drug money
(Ippolito’s?). He was a partner in Centrust Savings and Loan; his partners were BCCI (a CIA money-
laundering facility) and Simpson attorney F. Lee Bailey.
Curiously, when Ippolito was charged with cocaine distribution, his attorney was Edward Medvene - the
same attorney retained by Fred Goldman in his wrongful-death suit against Simpson (Fred Goldman
apparently was unaware that Simpson allegedly had transferred much of his wealth to an offshore bank
on the island of Sark).
Centrust S&L made a multi-million dollar loan to a felon associated with the Kemper Marley crime
syndicate. Marley, a former crony of Al Capone (above), employed the legal services of the current Chief
Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, William Rendquist (below).
In 1948, fifty two employees of Marley’s Arizona liquor monopoly, United Liquor, were jailed for liquor
violations, including United’s general manager Jim Hensley - the father-in-law of presidential candidate
Senator John McCain, who inherited Hensley’s beer distributorship.




After the Simpson trial, jurors claimed that juror Tracy Hampton had sat for hours staring at a blank
television screen and claiming to hear voices.
This could well have resulted from directed-energy mind-control equipment placed inside of a TV set
located in the juror’s sequestered living quarters - a perfect way to rig a trial outcome in order to foment
racial polarization. After her jury dismissal, Ms. Hampton allegedly tried to commit suicide by eating
broken glass.

If Mr. Simpson is a mind-control victim, presumably he would have been programmed in his youth after
displaying potential as a ball player. Determining the outcome of football games for gambling purposes
is easy, if some of the players are programmed multiples.
Back to Top

Future Illuminati Plans
Symbology plays a major role in the mindset of the Illuminati. Hence the great emphasis placed upon
Jerusalem, even though the Illuminati membership is Luciferian, not Islamic, Jewish or Christian.

It is the Illuminati intent to destroy the al Aqsa Mosque - the third holiest structure in Islam, which sits
atop the Temple Mount, by using scalar technology to activate the seismic fault which traverses the
Mount of Olives.
According to Judaic holy law, it is forbidden for Jews to set foot on the Temple Mount until it has been
purified by sprinkling the ashes of a pure-bred red heifer over the site. Such an heifer has been
genetically-bred for the purpose and was born four years ago. It has to be ritually sacrificed no later than
October, 2000.

Contrary to public knowledge, construction of the new Jerusalem Temple was commenced two decades
ago. For those who have ears to hear with, do not seek it on the Temple Mount. After the Dome of the
Rock has been destroyed and the red heifer’s ashes sprinkled, the Ark of the Covenant will be placed in
the Holy of Holies of the new temple. It is currently kept at a subterranean location in Egypt. It does not
contain Mosaic Tablets, but rather an object not of this world (the ark at Aksum, in Ethiopia, is a fake).

British and American Illuminati factions have trained Islamic terrorists in Britain and placed them under
the control of Osama bin Laden, prior to sending them to the Russian province of Chechnya and
proclaiming independence of the province from Russia. This is in order for Britain and America to exploit
the vast oil and mineral wealth of the Caspian region. Russia is scheduled to retaliate by launching a
nuclear first strike upon America, thus facilitating the Illuminati goal of depopulating America.
Vladimir Putin, who has terminal cancer, according to an informed Russian military medical source,
was appointed Head of State in order to serve as a scapegoat if the nuclear attack plan goes awry.

Prior to the planned nuclear attack, the Illuminati plans to foment widespread civil unrest against
governmental corruption in the American midwest, as a pretext for imposing a state of national
emergency. Since Asian and Hispanic Americans are considered the most malleable, most Blacks and
Caucasians are to be incarcerated in concentration camps or executed.
Those members of the military, law enforcement and intelligence communities who treasonously have
assisted the Illuminati in the aim of establishing a global government are to be summarily executed for
disloyalty, just as Saddam Hussein executed the army officers who assisted his coup d’etat, for who
feels secure when surrounded by people who have committed treason?

The Illuminati plan also calls for the execution of major political figures who have assisted them, also the
Kolob-worshipping Navoo Prophets, the latter being known in high Illuminati circles as the Council of
Twelve plus One.
This scenario is intended to culminate in the establishment of a totalitarian global government circa 2010,
after which time, the surviving members of humanity are to be reduced to a life of mediaeval serfdom.

There are some wild cards in this scenario:
     The writer believes that Russia will double-cross the Illuminati and attempt to become the
        dominant world power by virtue of its supremacy in geophysical warfare technology.
     There is a powerful anti-Illuminati faction in Japan which might result in a Japan / China military
        alliance.
     Also we must not overlook the fact that within the private sector exists the technology to
        manufacture endothermic beam weaponry and radio-frequency weaponry (the Illuminati has no
        meaningful defense against radio-frequency weapons, which have the capability of destroying
        computer circuitry from a considerable distance).
Mind-control programming has an unfortunate tendency to fail at inopportune moments; we must
therefore consider the 24,000 mind-controlled United Nations troops, who are currently stationed at a
                                                   (10)
covert moon base, as another possible wild card.

In concluding this article, it is well to remember that we are all to some extent brainwashed, thanks to
Illuminati-controlled social engineering projects, which employ the media to implant belief structures
                                                                (11)
which serve the interests of the military / industrial complex.
The omissions evident, in Peter Jennings’s book, unwitting or not, go to serve this purpose. Our
Illuminati overlords regard us as sheep who deserve to be fleeced; perhaps this is as it should be, since
most adult members of the populace are too politically-indifferent, or spineless, to rectify matters.
English Common Law used to demand that members of the public were required to raise a hue and cry,
if they had knowledge of criminal activity.
What are you going to do about it, dear reader?
Back to Top



NOTES & REFERENCES
1. Random House, Inc., New York, N.Y., 1999.

2. FDR and his cabinet were Standard Oil puppets, Nelson Rockefeller even being appointed as
Coordinator of Strategic Defense. Wanting Japan to abort its intention of declaring war upon the Soviets
(where the Rockefellers had vested oil and lumber interests) J.P. Morgan’s nephew was appointed
Ambassador to Japan in order to induce Japanese warlords to attack the USA instead. Most of the
Japanese weaponry and munitions were supplied by American companies. In November 1941,
correspondent Joe Lieb was notified by his friend, Secretary of State Cordell Hull, that Pearl Harbor
would be attacked on December 7th.

Lieb leaked the news to the U. P. news service. Only the Honolulu Advertiser bothered to publish the
news. Deliberately kept in the dark about the planned attack, Admiral Kimmel and General Short later
were made patsies and relieved of their commands. In fairness to surviving family relatives, this disgrace
should be expunged from the military records of these two gentlemen. The treasonous FDR died earlier
than is generally known and was replaced by doubles, including a movie actor named Captain Jack
Young (Winthrop Rutherfurd may have been another double). No autopsy was performed and the honor
guard was ordered to shoot anyone attempting to open the sealed casket. In his memoirs, Roosevelt’s
son, Elliott, stated that Stalin had informed him that his father had been assassinated by "the Churchill
gang".

3. In 1933, three American Nazis - Helen and E. Clifton Barton and Lawrence Echevarria, incorporated
the Internal Revenue Tax and Audit service as a private Delaware corporation, for the purpose of
establishing a monopoly tax collection agency on behalf of the government. Tax money was covertly
conduited to Germany to fund the Nazi military build-up. In 1936, the treasonous company became
unincorporated, in order to disguise its private ownership, and changed its name to the Internal Revenue
Service. The Bureau of Internal Revenue, created in 1862 to collect excise taxes, was abolished in 1953.

4. The controlling stockholder in the French multi-media giant Hachette Industries, is Saddam Hussein.
By providing a buffer between Iran and Syria, he is regarded as an asset by NATO, which is why he is
permitted to remain in power. More than 100 Iraqi terrorist cells armed with anthrax are known to exist in
the USA, awaiting payback time. Most of the cell members are women who lost loved ones in the war.
Pentagon researchers have determined that olive leaf extract is the best anthrax antidote. John
Kennedy Jr.’s magazine George is owned by Saddam Hussein.

5. The leader of the civilized group of global flood survivors who introduced the plough to the Sumerian
hunter-gatherers became known as Tas Mikigal, meaning "Lord of Agriculture". With the passage of time,
he became deified by the superstitious populous as "Lord of the Air". To them, it implied that he must
have possessed the capability of flight, which suggested that he had wings. He was depicted in this form
                              th
on Phoenician coins of the 5 century B.C., and on early pre-Roman era British coins. We know him as
Archangel Michael, celebrating Harvest Festival on Michaelmas Sunday. The Jews remained
unacquainted with angelology until they were taken into captivity by the Babylonians.

6. Blue plasma was observed emanating from the top of the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City
immediately prior to the blast. Simultaneously, computer wiring in adjacent buildings burned out. This
suggests that a Tesla-type geophysical device was used to momentarily lift the building off its
foundations, in order to detonate containers of an unstable mercuric explosive attached to structural
columns. Timothy McVeigh is almost certainly a mind-controlled patsy, which explains why he failed to
resist arrest, despite being armed.

7. Investigative journalist Alex Constantine has performed a sterling service by exposing the role of
intelligence agencies in mind-control activities. Virtual Government, Feral House, Venice, California,
1997.

8. O’Brien, C. and Phillips, M., Trance Formation of America, Reality Marketing, Inc., Las Vegas,
California, 1995.

9. Springmeier, F. and Wheeler, C., Deeper Insights into the Illuminati Formula, 916, Unn Ave., Oregon
City, Oregon, USA. These two volumes are requisite reading for any serious investigator of mind-control
activity and ritual sexual abuse, and should be read by every member of law enforcement.

10. Endothermic beam weapons generate an implosion at a quarter wavelength distance and possess
the capability of flash-freezing entire cities with power supplied by a d’Arsonval resonant over-unity
system.

11. The manner in which the Illuminati social engineers use the media, in order to implant a favorable
opinion of the military / industrial complex into the consciousness of the public, is exemplified by the Bob
Hope Christmas Show. Performed at military facilities several weeks prior to Christmas, so that Hope
was able to be home for Christmas, the show was aired by NBC television. NBC is owned by General
Electric - one of the nation’s largest manufacturers of military weapons. It is the writer’s understanding
that Mr. Hope is a major NBC stockholder and an asset of British Intelligence. He allegedly has an office
at NBC’s Burbank studio.

According to mind-control survivor Brice Taylor, who claims to have been used as a sex slave by various
prominent politicians, her slave handier was Bob Hope. Another mind-controlled sex slave survivor who
has never heard of Brice Taylor, recently told this writer that her handler was Bob Hope.

Ms. Taylor’s book "Thanks for the Memories", contains a wealth of mind-control information; it is
obtainable from the Brice Taylor Trust, P.O.Box 655, Landrum, S.C. 29356. Price: $34.95, inc. s&h.

Additional information appertaining to mind-control and Illuminati activities (including the assassination
of Princess Diana) is available on the video ’An Interview with a Mother Goddess’, and the book ’The
Biggest Secret’, by David lcke, both obtainable from Bookworld, ph.: 1 800 444 2524.

The social mores of the public are significantly influenced by the content of movies (e.g. desensitization
to violence). Always opportunistic, the Illuminati has a designated "A" list of major movie producers,
actors, directors and agents. In order to remain at the pinnacle of their profession, these people attend
mandatory seminars, at which a panel of Illuminati hacks reveal the type of movie content desired by the
Illuminati social engineers. At a recent "A" list gathering held at an exclusive estate in Wyoming, the
panel included several generals, a former Army Chief of Staff and two of Hollywood’s best known
directors - one Jewish , the other of Scottish descent, whose career has attained titanic proportions.

Many cults are used in order to ensnare potential mind-control victims for use as ritual murder subjects.
This was typified by the Solar Temple cult, which experienced 69 murders and suicides at its locations in
Switzerland, France and Canada. A neo-templar cult, members included the head of the French Secret
Service; its high priestess was Princess Grace of Monaco. Her death was not due to brake failure, as
claimed by the media, and may have been a ritual murder (Princess Diana’s murder occurred in the
Pont d’Alma tunnel - an ancient Illuminati sacrificial site, hence the Illuminati flaming torch symbol above
the tunnel entrance).

Princess Grace’s death may have been ordered because she knew too much about the fact that
Monaco is a major heroin refining center. Significantly, her death occurred at a time known to Illuminati
initiates as the "Feast of the Beast".

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_tavistock04.htm



DIPLOMACY BY DECEPTION

6 - Tavistock and "Operation Research" - Undeclared War
The founder for the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations, John Rawlings Reese, was to perfect a
system that would subvert and then control the thinking of human beings so that they could be
channeled in any direction so desired by the Committee of 300, also known as the Olympians. It must be
said that to do this, one must introduce an automated mentality into the bulk of the targeted population.
This is an objective with very far-reaching implications nationally and internationally.

The end result of Reese's objectives were and remain, control of all human life; its destruction when
deemed desirable, whether it be through mass genocide or mass slavery. We are witnessing both today.
One is the Global 2000 genocidal plan, which calls for the deaths of more of 500 million people by the
year 2010; the other is slavery by an economic means. Both systems are fully operational and working
side-by-side in today's America.

Reese began his Tavistock experiments in 1921; it soon became clear to him that his system could be
applied both domestically and militarily. Reese said that the solution to the problems he foresaw needed
a ruthless approach, without concern for religious or moral values. He later added another area to his list
that of nationalism.

Reese is known to have studied the work of the Nine Unkown Men, as referred to in 1860 by the French
writer Jacolliot. Among Jacolliot's remarks were that the Nine Unknown Men knew about the liberation
of energy, sterilization by radiation, propaganda and psychological warfare, all of which were absolutely
unheard of in that century. Jacolliot said that the technique of psychological warfare was "the

When it became obvious that British politicians were bent on solving the country's economic problems
by means of another war, Reese was given 80,000 British Army recruits to use as guinea pigs.
Operation Research was the name given to his project, and basically, it was designed to develop a
methodology (logistics) in military management that would make the best use of limited military
resources sea, air and land defense systems against Britain's foreign enemies.

Thus, the original program was a military-management one, but by 1946, Reese had developed
Operation Research to the point that it could be applied as a civilian management program. Reese had
"arrived," insofar as social engineering was concerned, but his work is concealed in top secret files at
Tavistock. Technically, the Reese Tavistock manual, of which I have a copy, is a full declaration of war
against the civilian population of any targeted country. Reese said that it had to be understood that
"whenever any government, groups, persons in positions of power" use his methods without the consent
of the people, it is understood by these governments or groups of people that conquest is the motive,
and that domestic warfare exists between them and the public.

Reese discovered that with social engineering comes the greater need for information that can be
rapidly collected and correlated. One of the earlier statements attributed to Reese was the necessity to
stay ahead of society and predict its moves by engineering situations. A big breakthrough for Reese and
his social tinkerers came with the discovery of linear programming by George B. Danzig in 1947. This
came at a time when Reese was engaged in a war with the American nation, a war which is still ongoing,
and which was greatly facilitated by the invention of the transistor by Bardeen, Brittain and Shockley in
1948.

Enter the Rockefellers, who gave a huge grant to Tavistock to enable Reese to press ahead with a study
of the American economy, using Operation Research methods. Simultaneously, the Rockefeller
Foundation gave Harvard University a four-year grant to create its own American economy model. The
year was 1949, and Harvard pressed ahead with its own economic model, based on Tavistock's.

The only stipulation Reese made as a condition of his cooperation with Harvard, was that Tavistock
methods be followed throughout. These were based upon the Prudential Assurance Bombing Survey
Study, which led to saturation bombing of German worker housing as a means of bringing about the
capitulation of the German war machine. These methods were now ready to be applied in a civilian
context.

Reese made a detailed study of America's entry into WWI, which he deemed to be the beginning of the
20th century. Reese realized that for America to be seduced away from so-called "isolationism,"
American thinking would have to be drastically changed. Woodrow Wilson had dragged America into
European affairs in 1916 with corruption and corrupting policies. Wilson sent American forces to fight on
Europe's battlefields, in spite of the warnings issued by the Founding Fathers, to stay out of foreign
entanglements. The Committee of 300, was determined to keep the United States entangled in
European and indeed world affairs forever after.

Wilson did not change Europe, but Europe changed America. The banishing of power politics, which is
what Wilson thought he could do, was not possible, because power is politics and politics is economic
power. This has been so since the earliest recorded history of politics: those of the city-states of the
Sumer and Akkad of 5,000 years ago, right down to Hitler and the USSR. Economics is only an
extension of a natural energy system, but that system, the elitists have always said, belongs under their
control.

In order for an economy to be under the control of elite body, it has to be an economy that is predictable
and totally manipulatable. This is what the Harvard model set out to accomplish, backed by the social
dynamics of the Reese Operation Research. Reese had discovered that to achieve total predictability in
population groups, the elements of society had to be brought under control under a yoke of slavery, and
dispossessed of the means of discovering their predicament, so that not knowing how to unite or a joint
defense, they would not know where to turn to for help.

That Tavistock methodology is at work can be found everywhere in the United States. People, not
knowing where to turn to understand the predicament they find themselves in, turn to the worst place of
all for supposed help: the government. The Harvard Economic Research Project, which began in 1948,
embodied all the Reese principles, which, in turn, came out of the Prudential Bombing Survey and
Operations Research. By joining forces, the elite felt that a means of controlling a nation's economy and
the population was now available with the coming of the computer age — both a blessing and a terrible
curse for mankind.

All science is only a means to an end, and man is knowledge (information), which ends in control. Who
the beneficiaries of that control are was decided by the Committee of 300 and its antecedents 300 years
ago. The war waged against the American people by Tavistock is now 47 years old and shows no signs
of letting up. As energy is the key to all life on this planet, through diplomacy by deception and outright
strong-arm methods, the Committee has gained control of most energy resources.

The Committee, by deception and dissembling, has also gained control of social energy, which is
expressed in economic terms. Provided that the ordinary citizen could be kept ignorant of the real
economic methods of bookkeeping, then the citizens would be doomed to lead a life of economic slavery.
This is what has happened. We, the people, gave our consent to the economic controllers of our lives
and became slaves of the elite. As Reese once said, people who will not use their intelligence have no
better rights than dumb animals who have no intelligence at all. Economic slavery is essential if good
order is to be maintained, and the ruling class may enjoy the fruits produced by slave labor.

Reese and his team of social scientists and social engineers went to work on the American public by
learning first, then understanding, and then attacking, the social energy (economics) and the mental and
physical weaknesses of the nation. Earlier, I said that the computer is both a blessing and a curse for
mankind. On the positive side, there are many emerging economists who, through the use of computers,
are starting to wake up to the fact that the Harvard model is a blueprint for economic slavery.

If this new breed of economic programmers can get its message out to the American people fast enough,
the New World Order (of slavery) can still be stopped. This is where diplomacy by deception plays such
a vast role in subverting through the media, education and influencing the way we think by distracting us
with issues of absolutely no importance, while the truly important issues are glossed over. In a major
policy study meeting ordered by the Committee of 300 in 1954, it was made clear to economic experts,
high-ranking government officials, bankers, and leaders of commerce and industry, that the war against
the American people was to be stepped up.

Robert McNamara was one of those who said that, because peace and good order was being
threatened by an out-of-control population, the wealth of the nation had to be moved away from the
undisciplined masses and into the control of the self-disciplined few.
McNamara savagely attacked overpopulation, which he said threatened to change the world in which we
live and make it ungovernable:
"We can begin with the most critical problems of population growth. As I have pointed out elsewhere,
short of nuclear war itself, it is the gravest issue that the world faces in the decades ahead. If current
trends continue, the world as a whole will not reach replacement level fertility - in effect an average of
two children per family - until about the year 2020. That means that the world's population would finally
stabilize at about 10 billion, compared with today's 4.3 billion.

"We call it stabilized, but what kind of stability would be possible? Can we assume that the levels of
poverty, hunger, stress, crowding and frustration that such a situation could cause in the developing
nations which by then would contain 9 out of 10 human beings on earth would be likely to assure social
stability? Or, for that matter, military stability?

"It is not a world that any of us would want to live in. Is such a world inevitable? It is not but there are
only two possible ways in which a world of 10 billion people can be averted. Either the current birthrate
must come down more quickly, or the current death rates must go up. There is no other way.

"There are, of course, many ways in which the death rates can go up. In a thermonuclear age, war can
accomplish it very quickly and decisively. Famine and disease are nature's ancient checks on population
growth, and neither one has disappeared from the scene."
In 1979 McNamara repeated his message to the leading bankers from around the world, and Thomas
Enders, a high-ranking State Department official, made the following statement:
"There is a single theme behind all of our work. We must reduce population growth. Either they do it our
way, through nice, clean methods, or they will get the kind of a mess that we have in El Salvador, or Iran,
or Beirut. Once population growth is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to
reduce it. Civil war can help things, but it would have to be greatly expanded. To reduce population
quickly, you have to pull all males into the fighting and kill significant numbers of fertile, child-bearing-
age females."
The solution to the problem of a world in which the elite would not want to live is mass genocide. The
Club of Rome was ordered to produce a blueprint that would wipe out 500 million of excess population.
The plan was called Global 2000, and it was activated by spreading the AIDS virus throughout Africa
and Brazil. Global 2000 was officially accepted as U.S. policy by President James Carter.

The conference members agreed that the,
"low-class element of society must be brought under total control, trained and assigned to duties at an
early age, which can be accomplished by the quality of education, which must be the poorest of the poor.
The lower-classes must be trained to accept their position, long before they have an opportunity to query
it."

"Technically, children must be 'orphaned' in day care centers under government control. With such an
initial handicap, the lower-classes will have little hope of upward mobility away from their assigned
positions in life. The form of slavery we have in mind is essential for good social order, peace and
tranquility.

"We have the resources to attack the vitality, options and mobility of the individuals in society by
knowing through our social scientist, understanding and manipulating and attacking their sources of
social energy (income), and therefore, their physical, mental and emotional strengths and weaknesses.
The general public refuses to improve its own mentality. It has become a herd of proliferating barbarians,
and a blight on the face of the earth.

"By measuring the economic habits by which the sheep try to run from their problems and escape from
reality via the medium of 'entertainment', it is absolutely possible, applying Operation Research methods,
to predict the probable combination shocks (created events) which are necessary to bring about
complete control and subjugation of the population by subverting the economy. The strategy includes
the use of amplifiers (advertising), and when we speak on television in the manner that a ten year old
can relate to, then because of the suggestions made, that person will purchase that production impulse,
the next time he comes across it in a store.

"The balance of power will provide the stability that the world of the 21st century is likely to achieve, rent
as it will be, by passionate tribalism and by such seemingly insoluble issues like that posed by mass
migration from the South to the North, and from farm to city. There may be mass transfers of population,
such as those between Greece and Turkey in the aftermath of the First World War; really mass murders.
It will be a time of troubles, in need of a unifier; an Alexander or Mohammed.

"A great change that will come about as a result of emerging conflicts between peoples who live side by
side — and which will, by their intensity, take primacy over their other conflicts — is that political rivalry
will be within regions, rather than between them. This will bring about a turning back from global politics.
After a decade in which the U.S. and the Soviet Union dueled across oceans, the powers will focus on
protecting themselves against forces on their frontiers — or within them.

"The American people do not know economic science and care little about it, hence, they are always
ripe for war. They cannot avoid war, notwithstanding their religious morality, nor can they find in religion
the solution to their earthly problems. They are knocked out of shape by economic experts who cause
Shockwaves that wreck budgets and buying habits. The American public is yet to realize that we control
their buying habits."
There we have it. Split up nations into tribal factions, keep the populace struggling to make a living and
concerned with regional conflicts so that they will never have an opportunity to get a clear view of what
is going on, let alone challenge it, and at the same time, bring about a drastic lowering of the world's
population.
We see this happening in the former Yugoslavia, where the country is being forced into small, tribal
entities, and we see it in America, where the average family has both parents working, and yet cannot
make ends meet. These parents do not have time to pay careful attention to how they are being
deceived and led into economic slavery. It is all a set-up.

Today, we observe — if we have the time— that the United States stand at the threshold of progressive
dissolution as the result of Tavistock's silent "control" war against the American nation. The Bush
presidency was a total disaster, and the Clinton presidency will be even more of a shock. This is the way
the blueprint is drawn, and we, the people, are fast losing faith in our institutions and our ability to
remake America into what it was intended to be — a very far cry from what it is now — overrun by
foreign people who threaten to engulf the nation — a South-North invasion right here in our own country.

We have surrendered our real wealth for a promise of greater wealth, instead of compensation in real
terms. We have fallen into the toils of the Babylonian system of "capitalism," which isn't capitalism at all,
but an appearance of capital, as typified by currency which is in fact negative capital. This is deceptive
and destructive. The U.S. dollar has the appearance of currency, but it is in fact a token of debt and
indebtedness.

Currency as we know it will be balanced by war and genocide—which is what is happening in front of
our very eyes. Total goods and services is real capital, and currency can be printed up to this level, but
not beyond it. Once currency is printed beyond the level of goods and services, it becomes a destructive,
subtractive force. War is the only way to "balance" the system by killing those creditors, which the
people docilely gave up true value in exchange for inflated currency.

Energy (economics) is the key to all earthly activities. Hence the often repeated statement I have made
that all wars are economic in origin. The thrust of the One World Government-New World Order must, of
necessity, be to obtain a monopoly of all goods and services, raw materials, and control over the
manner in which economics is taught. Only in this framework can the New World Order gain full control.
In the United States, we are constantly helping the One World Government to obtain control of the
world's natural resources by being tricked into giving part of our income for this purpose. It is called
"foreign aid."

Tavistock's Operation Research project states as follows:
"Our research has established that the simplest mode of gaining control of people is to keep them
undisciplined and in the dark of basic systems and principles while at the same time keeping them
disorganized, confused and distracted by issues which are of relatively little import

"In addition to our less direct long-range penetration methods, this can be accomplished by a
disengagement of mental activities and providing low quality programs of public education in
mathematics, logic, system designs and economics and by discouraging technical creativity.

"Our mode calls for emotional stimulus, increased use of amplifiers which induce self-indulgence,
whether direct (television programs) or advertising. We at Tavistock have found that the best way to
accomplish the goal is through an unremitting and unrelenting emotional affrontation and attack (mental
rape) through a constant barrage of sex, violence, wars, racial strife both in the electronic and print
media. This steady diet could be called 'mental junk food'.

"Of primary importance is the revision of history and law and subjecting the populace to the deviant
creation, thus shifting thinking from personal needs to constructed, fabricated outside priorities. The
general rule is that there is profit in confusion, the greater the confusion, the greater the profit. One of
the ways in which this can be accomplished is to create problems and then offer solutions.

"It is essential to divide the people, keep the adults' attention away from real issues and overcome their
thinking with matters of relatively little importance. The young must be kept ignorant of mathematics;
the proper teaching of economics and history must never be made available. Keep all groups so
occupied with an endless round of issues and problems that they have no time to think clearly, and here,
we rely on entertainment which should not reach beyond the mental capacity of a child in the sixth grade.

"When government is able to seize private property without just compensation, it is certain that people
are ripe for surrender and consenting to slavery and legal encroachment. Energy sources which support
a primitive economy are a supply of raw materials, the consent of people to labor, and assume a certain
place, position, level in the social structure viz., provide labor at various levels of the structure.

"Each class, therefore, guarantees its level of income and hence controls the class immediately below it,
thereby preserving the class structure. One of the best examples of this was found in the caste system
in India, in which rigid control was exercised, ensuring that upward mobility which could threaten the
elite at the top, was constrained. In this method is security and stability attained, and also a government
from the top.

"The sovereignty of the elite is threatened when the lower classes, through communications and
education become informed and envious of the power and possessions of the class above them. As
some of them become better educated, they seek to rise higher through a real knowledge of economics-
energy. This presents a real threat to the sovereignty of the elite class.

"It follows that the rise of the lower classes must be postponed long enough for the elite class to achieve
energy (economic) dominance, labor by consent becoming a lesser economic source. Until such
economic dominance is achieved to the fullest extent possible, the consent of people to labor and let
others handle their affairs has to be taken into account. Failure to achieve this goal would result in
interference in the final transfer of energy sources (economic wealth) to the control of the elite.

"Until such times, it is essential to recognize that public consent is still the essential key to the release of
energy in the process of economic amplification. A consent of energy release system is therefore vital.
Artificial security must be provided in the absence of the mother's womb, which can take the form of
withdrawal, protective devices and shelters. Such shells will provide a stable environment for stable and
unstable activity, and provide a shelter for the evolutionary processes of growth, that is to say, survival in
a shelter that gives defensive protection against offensive activities.

"It applies equally to the elite and the lower classes, but there is a definite difference in the manner in
which both these classes approach the solution of the problem. Our social science scientists have made
out a very compelling case that the reason why individuals create a political structure is because they
have a subconscious desire to perpetuate their childhood-dependency relationship.

"In the simplest of terms, what the subconscious longing demands is an earthly god to eliminate risks
from their lives, put food on the table and pat them on the back in a comforting way when things don't go
well. The demand for an earthly problem-solver-risk-eliminator is insatiable, which has given rise to a
substitute earthly god: the politician. The insatiable public demand for 'protection' is met by promises,
but the politician actually delivers little or nothing on his promises.

"Ever present in humans is a desire to control or subdue others who disturb their daily existence.
However, they are unable to cope with the moral and religious issues such actions would raise, so they
give the task to professional 'hit men', which we collectively call politicians.

"The services of politicians are engaged for a number of reasons, which, in the main are listed in the
following order:
1) To obtain the longed-for security without managing it.
2) To obtain action without the need to act, and without having to give the desired action thought.
3) To avoid responsibility for their intentions.
4) To obtain the benefits of reality without exerting the necessary discipline of learning.
"We can readily divide a nation into two sub-categories, the Political Sub Nation and the Docile Sub-
Nation. The politicians hold quasi-military jobs, of which the lowest is the police force, next come
attorneys. The presidential level is run by the international bankers. The docile sub-nation finances the
political machine by consent, that is to say, through taxation. The sub nation remains attached to the
political sub-nation, the latter feeding off it and growing stronger, until the day comes when it is strong
enough to devour its creator, the people."
When read in conjunction with the systems outlined in my book, the "Committee of 300", it is relatively
easy to see just how far Tavistock's Operation Research project has succeeded, and nowhere more so
than in the United States.
Recent statistics show that 75 percent of sixth grade school children were unable to pass what was
called "the maths test." The maths test consisted of elementary simple arithmetic, which ought to tell us
something. Mathematics did not come into the test at all. Cause for alarm?
You be the judge.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/diplomacy_deception/diplomacy_deception06.htm




                                             from Whale Website
To weaken the moral fiber of the nation and to demoralize workers in the labor class by creating mass
unemployment. As jobs dwindle due to the post industrial zero growth policies introduced by the Club of
Rome, the report envisages demoralized and discouraged workers resorting to alcohol and drugs. The
youth of the land will be encouraged by means of rock music and drugs to rebel against the status quo,
thus undermining and eventually destroying the family unit. In this regard, the Committee commissioned
Tavistock Institute to prepare a blueprint as to how this could be achieved. Tavistock directed Stanford
Research to undertake the work under the direction of Professor Willis Harmon. This work later
became known as the "Aquarian Conspiracy".
---Targets of the Illuminati and the Committee of 300 by Dr. John Coleman.



Tavistock, England
--This has been the primary programming center for England. The Rothschild programmers work out of
Tavistock. A large number of slaves in America have been programmed there. Tavistock has been
doing mind-control since before W.W.ll. Under the supervision of London’s W Board & 20 Committee
MI6 and MIS’s Section BIA ran double agents and mind-controlled spies/couriers during W.W. II. MI6
has had an office at Century House, No. 100, Westminster Bridge Road. MI5 offices have been in part
on Curzon St. MI5 has operated behind a number of fronts, incl. their fake travel agency Casuro
Holidays. MI-5’s address for mail is Room 055, The War Office, London. Special Intelligence Service
(SIS) dealt with all types of mind control. Tavistock was under SIS. The British government has had their
own telephone exchange with a 222 prefix, which was later linked to another secret exchange YTAN.
Outsiders could dial 222 8080 to get into the secret govt. exchange.

The Royal Free Hospital at the University of London works with Tavistock Clinic, as well as the Science
Policy Research Unit (SPRU) of Sussex University. A large number of Britian’s psychologist, social
workers and police get their training at Tavistock. Tavistock has set themselves up as the authority on
ritual abuse and MPD (DID). In other words, the primary programming site, is pretending to be the
leading institution trying to solve the problem! That’s a good cover.
The Illuminati Formula Appendix I: The Programmers



Because of the intensive artillery barrages of World War I, many soldiers were permanently impaired by
                                                         th
shell shock. In 1921, the Marquees of Tavistock, 11 Duke of Bedford, gave a building to a group
which planned to conduct rehabilitation programs for shell shocked British soldiers. The group took the
name of "Tavistock Institute" after its benefactor. The General Staff of the British Army decided it was
crucial that they determine the breaking point of the soldier under combat conditions. The Tavistock
Institute was taken over by Sir John Rawlings Reese, head of the British Army Psychological Warfare
Bureau.
A cadre of highly trained specialists in psychological warfare was built up in total secrecy. In fifty years,
the name "Tavistock Institute’ appears only twice in the Index of the New York Times, yet this group,
according to LaRouche and other authorities, organized and trained the entire staffs of the Office of
Strategic Services (OSS), the Strategic Bombing Survey, Supreme Headquarters of the Allied
Expeditionary Forces, and other key American military groups during World War II. During World War II,
the Tavistock Institute combined with the medical sciences division of the Rockefeller Foundation for
esoteric experiments with mind-altering drugs. The present drug culture of the United States is traced in
its entirety to this Institute, which supervised the Central Intelligence Agency’s training programs.
The "LSD counter culture" originated when Sandoz A.G., a Swiss pharmaceutical house owned by
S.G. Warburg & Co., developed a new drug from lysergic acid, called LSD. James Paul Warburg (son
of Paul Warburg who had written the Federal Reserve Act in 1910), financed a subsidiary of the
Tavistock Institute in the United States called the Institute for Policy Studies, whose director, Marcus
Raskin, was appointed to the National Security Council. James Paul Warburg set up a CIA program to
experiment with LSD on CIA agents, some of whom later committed suicide. This program, MK-Ultra,
supervised by Dr. Gottlieb, resulted in huge lawsuits against the United States Government by the
families of the victims.

The English Tavistock Institute has not restricted its activities to left-wing groups, but has also directed
the programs of such supposedly "conservative" American think tanks as the:
     Herbert Hoover Institute at Stanford University
     Heritage Foundation
     Wharton
     Hudson
     Massachusetts Institute of Technology
     Rand
The "sensitivity training" and "sexual encounter" programs of the most radical California groups such as
Esalen Institute and its many imitators were all developed and implemented by Tavistock Institute
psychologists.

One of the rare items concerning the Tavistock Institute appears in Business Week, Oct. 26, 1963, with
a photograph of its building in the most expensive medical offices area of London. The story mentions
"the Freudian bias" of the Institute, and comments that it is amply financed by British blue-chip
corporations, including Unilever, British Petroleum, and Baldwin Steel. According to Business Week, the
 psychological testing programs and group relations training programs of the Institute were implemented
 in the United States by the University of Michigan and the University of California, which are hotbeds of
 radicalism and the drug network.
                                          th
 It was the Marquees of Tavistock, 12 Duke of Bedford, whom Rudolf Hess flew to England to contact
 about ending World War II. Tavistock was said to be worth $40 million in 1942. In 1945, his wife
 committed suicide by taking an overdose of pills.
 APPENDIX I - SECRETS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE By Eustace Mullins



 Research into the use of microwave weapons and their use for mind control began in 1950s at the
 Tavistock Institute, one of Britain's leading psychiatric research establishments. The UK institute was
 researching into ways of mind controlling the British population without them knowing. The monkey
 submission response, whereby the dominant monkey caused submissive behaviour in the underlings,
 was the brain state of most interest to the British scientists. Having found this specific brain rhythm for
 docile submissive, zombie-like behaviour, it was then recorded and used as the template for the ELF
 signal beamed on UK microwave transmitters. Britain was the first discoverer of microwave technology,
 used for radar, in the 1940s and therefore had a commanding lead over everyone else in this field.
 MICROWAVE MIND CONTROL by Tim Rifat



 Tavistock, England
 --Men like mind-control expert/hypnotist Eric Trist worked for Tavistock. A six-man team which wore
 black berets also helped w/ mind control at Tavistock.

 Two people who became terrorists after their visits to Tavistock are Angela Davis and Stockley
 Carmichael who went to a conference at Tavistock entitled Dialectics of Liberation in 1967. It’s main
 building is a bland 6-story building. The address is The Training Office, The Tavistock Clinic, 120 Belsize
 Lane, London, UK NWs SBA. Tel. no. 071-435 7111. The chief exec. is Anton Obholzer. The Chair of
 Prof. Comm. is Nicholas Temple.
 Both are skilled in psychology. The Tavistock Clinic was founded in 1920, and in 1946 the Tavistock
 Institute was created as an independent body to assist the Tavistock Clinic. The Institute does more of
 the research. The Royal Free Hospital at the University of London works with Tavistock Clinic, as well as
 the Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU) of Sussex University. A large number of Britian’s psychologist,
 social workers and police get their training at Tavistock. Tavistock has set themselves up as the
 authority on ritual abuse and MPD (DID). In other words, the primary programming site, is pretending to
 be the leading institution trying to solve the problem! That’s a good cover.
 APPENDIX B. THE PROGRAMMING SITES Deeper Insights into the Illuminati Formula

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_tavistock02.htm




                                               by Dr. John Coleman
                           from Conspirators’ Hierarchy - The Story of the Committee of 300
        FLOW LABORATORIES
    Gets contracts from the National Institute of Health.
   MERLE THOMAS CORPORATION
    Gets contracts from the U.S. Navy, analyzes data from satellites.
   WALDEN RESEARCH
    Does work in the field of pollution control.
   PLANNING RESEARCH CORPORATION, ARTHUR D. LITTLE, G.E. “TEMPO,”
     OPERATIONS RESEARCH INC.
    Part of approximately 350 firms who conduct research and conduct surveys, make
    recommendations to government. They are part of what President Eisenhower called “a
    possible danger to public policy that could itself become captive of a scientific-technological
    elite.”
   BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
    Dedicates its work to what it calls a “national agenda.” Wrote President Hoover’s program,
    President Roosevelt’s “New Deal,” the Kennedy Administration’s “New Frontiers” program
    (deviation from it cost John F. Kennedy his life), and President Johnson’s “Great Society.”
    Brookings has been telling the United States Government how to conduct its affairs for the past
    70 years and is still doing so on behalf of the Committee of 300.
   HUDSON INSTITUTE
    Under the direction of Herman Khan, this institution has done more to shape the way Americans
    react to political and social events, think, vote and generally conduct themselves than perhaps
    any except the BIG FIVE. Hudson specializes in defense policy research and relations with the
    USSR. Most of its military work is classified as SECRET. (One idea during the Vietnam War was
    to build a moat around Saigon.) Some of its earlier papers were entitled “Stability and Tranquility
    Among Older Nations,” and “Analytical Summary of U.S. National Security Policy Issues.”

    Hudson prides itself on its diversity; it helped NASA with its space programs and helped to
    promote new youth fashions and ideas, youth rebellion and alienation for the Committee of 300,
    ostensibly funded by Coca Cola. Hudson may be quite properly classified as one of the
    Committee of 300’s BRAIN-WASHING establishments. Some of its nuclear war scenarios make
    for very interesting reading and, if they can be obtained, I would recommend “The 6 Basic
    Thermonuclear Threats” and “Possible Outcomes of Thermonuclear War” and one of its more
    frightening papers entitled “Israeli-Arab Nuclear War.”

    Hudson also does corporate advising for Committee of 300 companies, Rank, Xerox, General
    Electric, IBM and General Motors, to name but a few of them, but its really big client remains the
    U. S. Department of Defense which includes matters of civil defense, national security, military
    policy and arms control. To date it has not got into “wet NASA,” that is to say, the National
    Oceanographic Agency.
   NATIONAL TRAINING LABORATORIES
    NTL is also known as the International Institute for Applied Behavioral Sciences. This institute is
    definitely a brainwashing center based on Kurt Lewin principles which include so-called T-
    Groups (training groups), artificial stress training whereby participants suddenly find themselves
    immersed in defending themselves against vicious accusations. NTL takes in the National
    Education Association, the largest teacher-group in the United States.

    While officially decrying “racism,” it is interesting to note that NTL, working with NEA, produced
    a paper proposing education vouchers which would separate the hard-to-teach children from the
    brighter ones, and funding would be allocated according to the number of difficult children who
    would be separated from those who progressed at a normal rate. The proposal was not taken
    up.
   UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, WHARTON - SCHOOL OF FINANCE &
     COMMERCE
    Founded by Eric Trist, one of the “brain trusts” of Tavistock, Wharton has become one of the
    more important Tavistock institutions in the U.S. in so far as “Behavioral Research” is concerned.
    Wharton attracts clients such as the U.S. Department of Labor—which it teaches how to
    produce “cooked” statistics at the Wharton Econometric Forecasting Associates Incorporated.
    This method is very much in demand as we come to the close of 1991 with millions more out of
    work than is reflected in USDL statistics.

    Wharton’s ECONOMETRIC MODELING is used by every major Committee of 300 company in
    the United States, Western Europe and by the International Monetary Fund, the United Nations
    and the World Bank. Wharton has produced such note-worthy persons as George Schultz and
    Alan Greenspan.
   INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH
    This is the institute set up by “brain trusters” from Tavistock Rensis Likert, Dorwin Cartwright
    and Ronald Lippert. Among its studies are:
        o “The Human Meaning of Social Change”
        o “Youth in Transition”
        o “How Americans View Their Mental Health”
    Among the institute’s clients are
        o The Ford Foundation
        o U.S. Department of Defense
        o U.S. Postal Service and the U.S.Department of Justice
   INSTITUTE FOR THE FUTURE
    This is not a typical Tavistock institution in that it is funded by the Ford Foundation, yet it draws
    its long-range forecasting methodology from the mother of all think tanks. Institute for the Future
    projects what it believes to be changes that will be taking place in time frames of fifty years. The
    institute is supposed to be able to forecast socioeconomic trends and to blow the whistle on any
    departures from what it has laid down as normal.

    Institute for the Future believes it is possible and normal to intervene now and give decisions for
    the future. So-called “Delphi Panels” decide what is normal and what is not, and prepare
    position papers to “steer” government in the right direction to head off such groups as “people
    creating civil disorder.”
    (This could be patriotic groups demanding abolition of graduated taxes, or demanding that their
    right to bear arms is not infringed.)

    The institute recommends actions such as liberalizing abortion laws, drug usage and that cars
    entering an urban area pay tolls, teaching birth control in public schools, requiring registration of
    firearms, making the use of drugs a non-criminal offense, legalizing homosexuality, paying
    students for scholastic achievements, making zoning controls a preserve of the state, offering
    bonuses for family planning and last, but by no means least, a Pol Pot Cambodia-style proposal
    that new communities be established in rural areas. As will be observed, many of the Institute
    for the Future’s goals have already been more than fully realized.
   INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES (IPS)
    One of the “Big Three,” IPS has shaped and reshaped United States policies, foreign and
    domestic, since it was founded by James P. Warburg and the Rothschild entities in the United
    States, bolstered by Bertrand Russell and the British Socialists through its networks in America
    which include the League for Industrial democracy in which Leonard Woodcock played a leading,
    if behind-the-scenes role. Local lead players in the League for Industrial Democracy included
    “conservative” Jeane Kirkpatrick, Irwin Suall (of the ADL), Eugene Rostow (Arms Control
    negotiator), Lane Kirkland (Labor leader), and Albert Shanker.
For record purposes only, IPS was incorporated in 1963 by Marcus Raskin and Richard
Barnett, both highly-trained Tavistock Institute graduates. Most of the funding came from
Rothschild associates in America like the James Warburg Family, the Stern Family Foundation
and the Samuel Rubin Foundation. Samuel Rubin was a registered member of the Communist
Party who stole the Faberge name (Faberge was “Jeweler of the Imperial Russian Court”) and
made a fortune out of the Faberge name.

The objectives of IPS came from an agenda laid down for it by the British Round Table, which
agenda in turn came from Travistock Institute, one of the most notable being to create the “New
Left” as a grass roots movement in the U.S. IPS was to engender strife and unrest and spread
chaos like a wildfire out of control, proliferate the “ideals” of left wing nihilistic socialism, support
unrestricted use of drugs of all types, and be the “big stick” with which to beat the United States
political establishment.

Barnett and Raskin controlled such diverse elements as,
   o the Black Panthers
   o Daniel Ellsberg
   o National Security Council staff member Halperin
   o The Weathermen Underground
   o the Venceramos
   o the campaign staff of candidate George McGovern
No scheme was too big for IPS and its controllers to take on and manage.

Take the plot to “kidnap” Kissinger, which was in the hands of Eqbal Ahmed, a British MI-6
intelligence agent of Pakistani origin, laundered through “TROTS” (Trotskyite terrorists based in
London). The “plot” was “discovered” by the FBI so that it could not go too far. Ahmed went on
to become the director of one of IPS’s most influential agencies, The Transnational Institute
which, chameleon-like, changed from its former name, Institute of Race Relations, when
intelligence agents of BOSS (Bureau of State Security) in South Africa unmasked the fact that it
was tied directly to Rhodes Scholarship-Harry Oppenheimer and Anglo-American-British mining
interests in South Africa. BOSS also discredited the South Africa Foundation at the same time.

Through its many powerful lobbying groups on Capitol Hill, IPS relentlessly used its “big stick” to
beat Congress. IPS has a network of lobbyists, all supposedly operating independently but in
actual fact acting cohesively, so that Congressmen are pummeled from all sides by seemingly
different and varied lobbyists. In this way, IPS was, and is still, able to successfully sway
individual Representatives and Senators to vote for “the trend, the way things are going.” By
using key point men on Capitol Hill, IPS was able to break into the very infrastructure of our
legislative system and the way it works.

To give only a single concrete example of what I am talking about: in 1975, an IPS point man
persuaded representative John Conyers (D-Michigan) and forty-seven members of the House to
request IPS to prepare a budget study that would oppose the budget being prepared by
President Gerald Ford. Although not adopted, the request was reinstated in 1976, 1977, and
1978 gathering sponsors as it went.

Then in 1978, fifty-six Congressmen signed their names to sponsor an IPS budget study. This
was prepared by Marcus Raskin. Raskin’s budget called for a fifty percent cut in the Defense
Budget, a socialist housing program “that would compete with and steadily replace private
housing and mortgage markets,” a national health service, “radical changes in the educational
system that would disrupt capitalist control over the distribution of knowledge,” and several other
radical ideas.

The influence of IPS on Arms Control negotiations was a major factor in getting Nixon to sign
the treasonous ABM Treaty in 1972, which left the United States virtually defenseless against
    ICBM attack for almost 10 years. IPS became, and remains to this day one of the most
    prestigious “think tanks” controlling foreign policy decisions, which we, the people, foolishly
    believe are those of our law makers.

    By sponsoring militant activism at home and with links to revolutionaries abroad, by engineering
    such victories as “The Pentagon Papers,” besieging the corporate structure, bridging the
    credibility gap between underground movements and acceptable political activism, by
    penetrating religious organizations and using them to sow discord in America, such as radical
    racial politics under the guise of religion, using the establishment media to spread IPS ideas,
    and then supporting them, IPS has lived up to the role which it was founded to play.
   STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    Jesse Hobson, the first president of Stanford Research Institute, in a 1952 speech made it
    clear what lines the institute was to follow.
    Stanford can be described as one of the “jewels” in Tavistock’s Crown in its rule over the United
    States. Founded in 1946 immediately after the close of WW II, it was presided over by Charles
    A. Anderson, with emphasis on mind control re-search and “future sciences.” Included under
    the Stanford umbrella was Charles F. Kettering Foundation which developed the “Changing
    Images of Man” upon which the Aquarian Conspiracy rests.

    Some of Stanford’s major clients and contracts were at first centered around the defense
    establishment but, as Stanford grew, so did the diversity of its services:
        o Applications of Behavioral Sciences to Research
        o Management
        o Office of Science and Technology
        o SRI Business Intelligence Program
        o U.S. Department of Defense Directorate of Defense
        o Research and Engineering
        o U.S. Department of Defense Office of Aerospace Research
    Among corporations seeking Stanford’s services were
        o Wells Fargo Bank
        o Bechtel Corporation
        o Hewlett Packard
        o Bank of America
        o McDonnell-Douglas Corporation
        o Blyth
        o Eastman Dillon
        o TRW Company
    One of Stanford’s more secret projects was extensive work on chemical and bacteriological
    warfare (CAB) weapons.

    Stanford Research is plugged into at least 200 smaller “think tanks” doing research into every
    facet of life in America. This is known as ARPA networking and represents the emergence of
    probably the most far-reaching effort to control the environment of every individual in the country.
    At present Stanford’s computers are linked with 2500 “sister” research consoles which include
    the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Bell Telephone Laboratories, U.S. Army Intelligence, the
    Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), RANI, MIT, Harvard and UCLA. Stanford plays a key role in
    that it is the “library,” cataloging all ARPA documentation.

    “Other agencies”—and one can use one’s imagination here, are allowed to search through SRI’s
    “library” for key words, phrases, look through sources and update their own master files with
    those of Stanford Research Center. The Pentagon, for instance, uses SRI’s “master files”
    extensively, and there is little doubt that other U.S. Government agencies do the same.
    Pentagon “command and control” problems are worked out by Stanford.

    While ostensibly these apply only to weapons and soldiers, there is absolutely no guarantee that
    the same research could not, and will not, be turned to civilian applications. Stanford is known to
    be willing to do anything for anyone, and it is my belief that if ever SRI were to be fully exposed,
    the hostility which would arise from revelations as to what it actually does would most probably
    force SRI to close.
   MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, ALFRED P. SLOAN
    SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

    This major institute is not generally recognized as being a part of Tavistock U.S.A. Most people
    look upon it as a purely American institution, but that is far from being the case. MIT-Alfred
    Sloan can be roughly divided into the following groups:
        o Contemporary Technology
        o Industrial Relations
        o Lewin Group Psychology
        o NASA-ERC Computer Research Laboratories
        o Office of Naval Research Group, Psychology
        o Systems Dynamics.
    Forrestor and Meadows wrote The Club of Rome’s “Limits of Growth” zero growth study.
    Some of MIT’s clients include the following:
        o American Management Association
        o American Red Cross
        o Committee for Economic Development
        o GTE
        o Institute for Defense Analysis (IDA)
        o NASA
        o National Academy of Sciences
        o National Council of Churches
        o Sylvania
        o TRW
        o U.S. Army
        o U.S. Department of State
        o U.S. Navy
        o U.S. Treasury
        o Volkswagen Company
    So vast is the reach of IDA that it would take hundreds of pages to describe the activities in
    which it is engaged, and IDA is fully described in my book on the role played by Institutions and
    Foundations in committing treason against the United States of America, which will be published
    early in 1992.
   RAND RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

    Without a doubt, RAND is THE think tank most beholden to Tavistock Institute and certainly
    the RIIA’s most prestigious vehicle for control of United States policies at every level.

    Specific RAND policies that became operative include our ICBM program, prime analyses for
    U.S. foreign policy making, instigator of space programs, U.S. nuclear policies, corporate
    analyses, hundreds of projects for the military, the Central intelligence Agency (CIA) in relation
    to the use of mind altering drugs like peyote, LSD (the covert MK-Ultra operation which lasted
    for 20 years).

    Some of RAND’s clients include the following:
       o American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T)
       o Chase Manhattan Bank
       o International Business Machines (IBM)
       o National Science Foundation
       o Republican Party
       o TRW
                o U.S. Air Force
                o U.S. Department of Energy
                o U.S. Department of Health
           There are literally THOUSANDS of highly important companies, government institutions and
           organizations that make use of RAND’s services, and to list them all would be an impossible
           task. Among RAND’s “specialities” is a study group that predicts the timing and the direction of a
           thermonuclear war, plus working out the many scenarios based upon its findings.
           RAND was once accused of being commissioned by the USSR to work out terms of surrender
           of the United States Government, an accusation that went all the way to the United States
           Senate, where it was taken up by Senator Symington and subsequently fell victim to articles of
           scorn poured out by the establishment press. BRAIN WASHING remains the primary function of
           RAND.
 To summarize, the major Tavistock institutions in the United States engaged in brainwashing at all
 levels, including government, the military, business, religious organizations and education are the
 following:
        Brookings Institution
        Hudson Institute
        Institute for Policy Studies
        Massachusetts Institute of Technology
        National Training Laboratories
        Rand Research and Development Corporation
        Stanford Research Institute
        Wharton School at University of Pennsylvania
 It is estimated by sources of mine that the total number of people employed by these institutions is in the
 region of 50,000 with funding close to $10 billion dollars.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_tavistock05.htm




                                            by Dr. Byron T. Weeks, MD
                                                       July 31, 2001
                                                     Spanish version
                                               from EducateYourself Website
     Editor's Note: No one deserves more credit than Dr. John Coleman for bringing to light the history and true
     purpose of the City of London's Tavistock Institute and its many subdivisional institutions and organizations
     which was exposed in stunning detail in his 1992 book, Conspirators' Hierachy - The Story of The Committee
     of 300. Dr Coleman has rightly complained that many NWO expose writers who have followed in his wake,
     have used his original research without crediting him as the originating source and in fairness to him, it should
     be observed that the information presented below is a reflection of his pioneering investigations into Tavistock.

     The article below was sent to John Quinn by Dr. Byron Weeks. The insidious propaganda and public opinion
     manipulations (including mind control agendas) orchestrated by London's Tavistock Institute is covered at
     length in the books of David Icke and Dr John Coleman, but this recent article adds fresh insights and
     historical perspective. Our thanks to Brice Taylor <> for forwarding...
     Ken Adachi
                                TAVISTOCK INSTITUTE
                                     30 Tabernacle Street
                                      London EC2A 4DD


Contents
    1.   Preface from John Quinn
    2.   The Best Kept Secret In America
    3.   Tavistock Institutions In The United States
    4.   Institute For Policy Studies (IPS)
    5.   Stanford Research Institute (SRI)
    6.   Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Alfred P. Sloan School of Management
    7.   RAND Research And Development Corporation
                                         Return to Tavistock Institute




Preface from John Quinn (NewsHawk)
This forwarded article was received from Byron Weeks; who in our opinion really has a good firm handle
on exactly WHAT is up on many levels with the extraordinarily extensive "control trips" currently being
directed against the peoples of the world by elements of the global shadow government.

Weeks, whom I quoted at length in the book PHOENIX UNDEAD, has sent us this compelling look at a
globally-active British institute which has had it's hands in just about every social and
political/governmental movement of note throughout much of the world for the past 50 years.

For example, ever wonder who and what is "behind", let's say, the CIA? Well, they don't swear
allegiance to America, that's for certain. Try the British royal family.

This report is the real stuff-solidly researched and meticulously documented; so for lots more truly
concept-bending data, read on.

NewsHawk Inc.


To John Quinn

I believe Tavistock has always had secret ties to British Freemasonry.

Byron T. Weeks, MD
Col. AFUS, MC, Ret.
Back to Top
The Best Kept Secret In America
Formed in 1947, the Tavistock Institute is an independent not-for-profit organization which seeks to
combine research in the social sciences with professional practice. Problems of institution-building and
organizational design and change are being tackled in all sectors - government, industry and commerce,
health and welfare, education, etc. - nationally and internationally, and clients range from multinationals
to small community groups. A growth area has been the use of a developmental approach to evaluation
of new and experimental programmes, particularly in health, education and community development.
This has also produced new training events alongside the regular programme of group relations
conferences. The Institute owns and edits the monthly journal Human Relations (published by Plenum
                             th
Press) which is now in its 48 year, and has recently launched (in conjunction with Sage Publications) a
new journal Evaluation.
Three elements combine to make the Institute unusual, if not unique: it has the independence of being
entirely self-financing, with no subsidies from the government or other sources; the action research
orientation places it between, but not in, the worlds of academia and consultancy; and its range of
disciplines include anthropology, economics, organizational behavior, political science, psychoanalysis,
psychology and sociology.

So reads the opening paragraphs of the Tavistock Institute home page at www.tavinstitute.org

The ideology of American foundations was created by the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in
                                                                           th
London. In 1921, the Duke of Bedford, Marquess of Tavistock, the 11 Duke, gave a building to the
Institute to study the effect of shellshock on British soldiers who survived World War I. Its purpose was
to establish the "breaking point" of men under stress, under the direction of the British Army Bureau of
Psychological Warfare, commanded by Sir John Rawlings-Reese.

Tavistock Institute is headquartered in London. Its prophet, Sigmond Freud, settled in Maresfield
Gardens when he moved to England. He was given a mansion by Princess Bonaparte. Tavistock's
pioneer work in behavioral science along Freudian lines of "controlling" humans established it as the
world center of foundation ideology. Its network now extends from the University of Sussex to the U.S.
through the
     Stanford Research Institute
     Esalen
     MIT
     Hudson Institute
     Heritage Foundation
     Center of Strategic and International Studies at Georgetown, where State Dept. personal are
        trained, US Air Force Intelligence, and the Rand and Mitre corporations
The personnel of the corporations are required to undergo indoctrination at one or more of these
Tavistock controlled institutions. A network of secret groups, the Mont Pelerin Society, Trilateral
Commission, Ditchley Foundation, and the Club of Rome is conduit for instructions to the Tavistock
network.




                                      Statue Of *Sigmund Freud* in front of
                                     The Tavistock Institute of mind control
Tavistock Institute developed the mass brain-washing techniques which were first used experimentally
on American prisoners of war in Korea. Its experiments in crowd control methods have been widely used
on the American public, a surreptitious but nevertheless outrageous assault on human freedom by
modifying individual behavior through topical psychology. A German refugee, Kurt Lewin, became
director of Tavistock in 1932. He came to the U.S. in 1933 as a "refugee", the first of many infiltrators,
and set up the Harvard Psychology Clinic, which originated the propaganda campaign to turn the
American public against Germany and involve us in World War II.
In 1938, Roosevelt executed a secret agreement with Churchill which in effect ceded U.S. sovereignty
to England, because it agreed to let Special Operations Executive control U.S. policies. To implement
this agreement, Roosevelt sent General Donovan to London for indoctrination before setting up OSS
(now the CIA) under the aegis of SOE-SIS. The entire OSS program, as well as the CIA has always
worked on guidelines set up by the Tavistock Institute.

Tavistock Institute originated the mass civilian bombing raids carried out by Roosevelt and Churchill
purely as a clinical experiment in mass terror, keeping records of the results as they watched the
"guinea pigs" reacting under "controlled laboratory conditions". All Tavistock and American foundation
techniques have a single goal---to break down the psychological strength of the individual and render
him helpless to oppose the dictators of the World Order. Any technique which helps to break down the
family unit, and family inculcated principles of religion, honor, patriotism and sexual behavior, is used by
the Tavistock scientists as weapons of crowd control.
The methods of Freudian psychotherapy induce permanent mental illness in those who undergo this
treatment by destabilizing their character. The victim is then advised to "establish new rituals of personal
interaction", that is, to indulge in brief sexual encounters which actually set the participants adrift with no
stable personal relationships in their lives, destroying their ability to establish or maintain a family.

Tavistock Institute has developed such power in the U.S. that no one achieves prominence in any field
unless he has been trained in behavioral science at Tavistock or one of its subsidiaries. Henry
Kissinger, whose meteoric rise to power is otherwise inexplicable, was a German refugee and student
of Sir John Rawlings-Reese at SHAEF. Dr. Peter Bourne, a Tavistock Institute psychologist, picked
Jimmy Carter for President of the U.S. solely because Carter had undergone an intensive brainwashing
program administered by Admiral Hyman Rickover at Annapolis.

The "experiment" in compulsory racial integration in the U.S. was organized by Ronald Lippert, of the
OSS and the American Jewish Congress, and director of child training at the Commission on
Community Relations. The program was designed to break down the individual's sense of personal
knowledge in his identity, his racial heritage. Through the Stanford Research Institute, Tavistock controls
the National Education Association. The Institute of Social Research at the National Training Lab brain
washes the leading executives of business and government. Such is the power of Tavistock that our
entire space program was scrapped for nine years so that the Soviets could catch up. The hiatus was
demanded in an article written by Dr. Anatol Rapport, and was promptly granted by the government, to
the complete mystification of everyone connected with NASA. Another prominent Tavistock operation is
the Wharton School of Finance, at the University of Pennsylvania.

A single common denominator identifies the common Tavistock strategy---the use of drugs. The
infamous MK Ultra program of the CIA, in which unsuspecting CIA officials were given LSD, and their
reaction studied like "guinea pigs", resulted in several deaths. The U.S. Government had to pay millions
in damages to the families of the victims, but the culprits were never indicted. The program originated
when Sandoz AG, a Swiss drug firm, owned by S.G. Warburg Co. of London, developed Lysergic Acid.
Roosevelt's advisor, James Paul Warburg, son of Paul Warburg who wrote the Federal Reserve Act,
and nephew of Max Warburg who had financed Hitler, set up the Institute for Policy Studies to promote
the drug. The result was the LSD "counter-culture" of the 1960s, the "student revolution", which was
financed by $25 million from the CIA.

One part of MK Ultra was the Human Ecology Fund; the CIA also paid Dr. Herbert Kelman of Harvard
to carry out further experiments on mind control. In the 1950s, the CIA financed extensive LSD
experiments in Canada. Dr. D. Ewen Cameron, president of the Canadian Psychological Association,
and director of Royal Victorian Hospital, Montreal, received large payments from the CIA to give 53
patients large doses of LSD and record their reactions; the patients were drugged into weeks of sleep
and then given electric shock treatments. One victim, the wife of a member of the Canadian Parliament,
is now suing the U.S. companies who provided the drug for the CIA. All the records of the CIA's drug
testing program were ordered destroyed by the head of MK Ultra.

Because all efforts of the Tavistock Institute are directed toward producing cyclical collapse, the effect
of the CIA programs are tragically apparent. R. Emmett Tyrell Jr., writing in the Washington Post
August 20, 1984, cites the "squalid consequences of the 60s radicals in SDS" as resulting in "the
growing rate of illegitimacy, petty lawlessness, drug addiction, welfare, VD, and mental illness".

This is the legacy of the Warburgs and the CIA. Their principal agency, the Institute for Policy Studies,
was funded by James Paul Warburg; its co-founder was Marcus Raskin, protégé of McGeorge Bundy,
president of the Ford Foundation. Bundy had Raskin appointed to the post of President Kennedy's
personal representative on the National Security Council, and in 1963 funded Students for Democratic
Society, through which the CIA operated the drug culture.

Today the Tavistock Institute operates a $6 Billion a year network of Foundations in the U.S., all of it
funded by U.S. taxpayers' money. Ten major institutions are under its direct control, with 400
subsidiaries, and 3000 other study groups and think tanks which originate many types of programs to
increase the control of the World Order over the American people. The Stanford Research Institute,
adjoining the Hoover Institution, is a $150 million a year operation with 3300 employees. It carries on
program surveillance for Bechtel, Kaiser, and 400 other companies, and extensive intelligence
operations for the CIA. It is the largest institution on the West Coast promoting mind control and the
behavioral sciences.

One of the key agencies as a conduit for secret instructions from Tavistock is the Ditchley Foundation,
founded in 1957. The American branch of the Ditchley Foundation is run by Cyrus Vance, former
Secretary of State, and director of the Rockefeller Foundation, and Winston Lord, president of the
Council on Foreign Relations.

One of the principal but little known operations of the Rockefeller Foundation has been its techniques for
controlling world agriculture. Its director, Kenneth Wernimont, set up Rockefeller controlled agricultural
programs throughout Mexico and Latin America. The independent farmer is a great threat to the World
Order, because he produces for himself, and because his produce can be converted into capital, which
gives him independence. In Soviet Russia, the Bolsheviks believed they had attained total control over
the people; they were dismayed to find their plans threatened by the stubborn independence of the small
farmers, the Kulaks. Stalin ordered the OGPU to seize all food and animals of the Kulaks, and to starve
them out. The Chicago American, February 25, 1935 carried a front page headline,
                                 SIX MILLION PERISH IN SOVIET FAMINE
                          Peasants' Crops Seized, They and their Animals Starve
To draw attention from this atrocity, it was later alleged that the Germans, not the Soviets, had killed six
million people, the number taken from the Chicago American headline by a Chicago publicist.

The Communist Party, the Party of the Peasants and Workers, exterminated the peasants and enslaved
the workers. Many totalitarian regimes have found the small farmer to be their biggest stumbling block.
The French Reign of Terror was directed, not against the aristocrats, many of whom were sympathetic
to it, but against the small farmers who refused to turn over their grain to the revolutionary tribunals in
exchange for the worthless assignats. In the United States, the foundations are presently engaged in the
same type of war of extermination against the American farmer. The traditional formula of land plus
labor for the farmer has been altered due to the farmer's need for purchasing power, to buy industrial
goods needed in his farming operations.
Because of this need for capital, the farmer is especially vulnerable to the World Order's manipulation of
interest rates, which is bankrupting him. Just as in the Soviet Union, in the early 1930s, when Stalin
ordered the Kulaks to give up their small plots of land to live and work on the collective farms, the
American small farmer faces the same type of extermination, being forced to give up his small plot of
land to become a hired hand for the big agricultural trusts. The Brookings Institution and other
foundations originated the monetary programs implemented by the Federal Reserve System to destroy
the American farmer, a replay of the Soviet tragedy in Russia, with one proviso that the farmer will be
allowed to survive if he becomes a slave worker of the giant trusts.

Once the citizen becomes aware of the true role of the foundations, he can understand the high interest
rates, high taxes, the destruction of the family, the degradation of the churches into forums for revolution,
the subversion of the universities into CIA cesspools of drug addiction, and the halls of government into
sewers of international espionage and intrigue. The American citizen can now understand why every
agent of the federal government is against him; the alphabet agencies, the FBI, IRS, CIA and BATF
must make war on the citizen in order to carry out the programs of the foundations.

The foundations are in direct violation of their charters, which commit them to do "charitable" work,
because they make no grants which are not part of a political goal. The charge has been made, and
never denied, that the Heritage-AEI network has at least two KGB moles on its staff. The employment of
professional intelligence operatives as "charitable" workers, as was done in the Red Cross Mission to
Russia in 1917, exposes the sinister political economic and social goals which the World Order requires
the foundations to achieve through their " bequests ".

Not only is this tax fraud, because the foundations are granted tax exemption solely to do charitable
work, but it is criminal syndicalism, conspiracy to commit offenses against the United States of America,
Constitutional Law 213, Corpus Juris Secundum 16. For the first time, the close interlocking of the
foundation "syndicate" has been revealed by the names of its principle incorporators---Daniel Coit
Gilman, who incorporated the Peabody Fund and the John Slater Fund, and became an incorporator of
the General Education Board (now the Rockefeller Foundation); Gilman, who also incorporated the
Russell Trust in 1856, later became an incorporator of the Carnegie Institution with Andrew Dickson
White (Russell Trust) and Frederic A. Delano. Delano also was an original incorporator of the
Brookings Institution and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Daniel Coit Gilman incorporated the Russell Sage Foundation with Cleveland H. Dodge of the National
City Bank. These foundations incorporators have been closely linked with the Federal Reserve System,
the War Industries Board of World War I, the OSS of World War II and the CIA. They have also been
closely linked with the American International Corporation, which was formed to instigate the Bolshevik
Revolution in Russia. Delano, an uncle of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, was on the original Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System in 1914. His brother-in-law founded the influential
Washington law firm of Covington and Burling. The Delanos and other ruling families of the World
Order trace their lineage directly back to William of Orange and the regime which granted the charter of
the Bank of England.
Back to Top

Tavistock Institutions In The United States
     Flow Laboratories
       Gets contracts from the National Institutes of Health.
     Merle Thomas Corporation
       Gets contracts from the U.S. Navy, analyzes data from satellites.
     Walden Research
       Does work in the field of pollution control.
     Planning Research Corporation, Arthur D. Little, G.E. "TEMPO", Operations Research Inc.
       Part of approximately 350 firms who conduct research and conduct surveys, make
       recommendations to government. They are part of what President Eisenhower called "a
       possible danger to public policy that could itself become captive of a scientific-technological
       elite."
     Brookings Institution (1)
       Dedicates its work to what it calls a "national agenda." Wrote President Hoover's program,
       President Roosevelt's "New Deal", the Kennedy Administration's "New Frontiers" program
       (deviation from it may have cost John F. Kennedy his life), and President Johnson's "Great
   Society." Brookings has been telling the United States Government how to conduct its affairs for
   the past 70 years and is still doing so.
 Hudson Institute
   This institution has done more to shape the way Americans react to political and social events,
   think, vote and generally conduct themselves than perhaps any except the BIG FIVE. Hudson
   specializes in defense policy research and relations with the USSR. Most of its military work is
   classified as SECRET. (One idea during the Vietnam War was to build a moat around Saigon.)
   Hudson may be properly classified as one of the Committee of 300's BRAINWASHING
   establishments. One of its largest clients is the U.S. Department of Defense which includes
   matters of civil defense, national security, military policy and arms control.
 National Training Laboratories
   One of the key institutions established for this purpose in the United States was the National
   Training Laboratories (NTL). Founded in 1947 by members of the Tavistock network in the
   United States and located originally on an estate in Bethel, Maine, NTL had as its explicit
   purpose the brainwashing of leaders of the government, educational institutions, and corporate
   bureaucracies in the Tavistock method, and then using these "leaders" to either themselves run
   Tavistock group sessions in their organizations or to hire other similarly trained group leaders to
   do the job. The "nuts and bolts" of the NTL operation revolves around the particular form of
   Tavistock degenerate psychology known as "group dynamics," developed by German Tavistock
   operative Kurt Lewin, who emigrated to the United States in the 1930s and whose students
   founded NTL.
   In a Lewinite brainwashing group, a number of individuals from varying backgrounds and
   personalities, are manipulated by a "group leader" to form a "consensus" of opinion, achieving a
   new "group identity." The key to the process is the creation of a controlled environment, in which
   stress is introduced (sometimes called dissonance) to crack an individual's belief structure.
   Using the peer pressure of other group members, the individual is "cracked," and a new
   personality emerges with new values. The degrading experience causes the person to deny that
   any change has taken place. In that way, an individual is brainwashed without the victim
   knowing what has taken place.

    This method is the same, with some minor modification, used in all so-called "sensitivity groups"
    or "T-groups," or in the more extreme rock-drug-sex counterculture form, "touchy-feely groups,"
    such as the kind popularized from the 1960s onward by the Esalen Institute, which was set up
    with the help of NTL.

    From the mid-1950s onward, NTL put the majority of the nation's corporate leaderships through
    such brainwashing programs, while running similar programs for the State Department, the
    Navy, the Department of Education, and other sections of the federal bureaucracy. There is no
    firm estimate of the number of Americans who have been put through this process in last 40
    years at either NTL, or as it is now known the NTL Institute for Applied Behavioral Sciences,
    which is based in Rosslyn, Virginia, or its West Coast base of operations, the Western Training
    Laboratories in Group Development, or in various satellite institutions. The most reliable
    estimate is in the several millions.

    One of the groups that went through the NTL mill in the 1950s was the leadership of the
    National Education Association, the largest organization of teachers in the United States. Thus,
    the NEA's outlook has been "shaped" by Tavistock, through the NTL. In 1964, the NTL Institute
    became a direct part of the NEA, with the NTL setting up "group sessions" for all its affiliates.
    With funding from the Department of Education, the NTL Institute drafted the programs for the
    training of the nation's primary and secondary school teachers, and has a hand as well in
    developing the content of educational "reforms," including OBE.

    Also known as the International Institute for Applied Behavioral Sciences. This institute is a
    brainwashing center in artificial stress training whereby participants suddenly find themselves
    immersed in defending themselves against vicious accusations. NTL takes in the National
    Education Association (1), the largest teacher group in the United States. While officially
       decrying "racism", it is interesting to note that NTL, working with NEA, produced a paper
       proposing education vouchers which would separate the hard-to-teach children from the brighter
       ones, and funding would be allocated according to the number of difficult children who would be
       separated from those who progressed at a normal rate. The proposal was not taken up.
     University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School of Finance & Commerce Founded by Eric
       Trist
       One of the "brain trusts" of Tavistock, Wharton has become one of the more important Tavistock
       in so far as "Behavioral Research" is concerned. Wharton attracts clients such as the U.S.
       Department of Labor---which teaches how to produce "cooked" statistics at the Wharton
       Econometric Forecasting Associates Incorporated. This method was very much in demand as
       we came to the close of 1991 with millions more out of work than was reflected in USDL
       statistics. Wharton's ECONOMETRIC MODELING is used by every major Committee of 300
       company in the United States, Western Europe, the International Monetary Fund, the United
       Nations, and the World Bank.
     Institute for Social Research
       Among its clients are The Ford Foundation, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Postal Service
       and the U.S. Department of Justice. Among its studies are "The Human Meaning Of Social
       Change", "Youth in Transition" and "How Americans View Their Mental Health".
     Institute For The Future
       This is not a typical Tavistock institution in that it is funded by the Ford Foundation, yet it draws
       its long-range forecasting from the mother of all think tanks. Institute for the Future projects what
       it believes to be changes that will be taking place in time frames of fifty years. So called
       "DELPHI PANELS" decide what is normal and what is not, and prepare position papers to
       "steer" government in the right direction to head off such groups as "people creating civil
       disorder."
       (This could be patriotic groups demanding abolition of graduated taxes, or demanding that their
       right to bear arms is not infringed.)
       This institute recommends action such as liberalizing abortion laws, drug usage and that cars
       entering an urban area pay tolls, teaching birth control in public schools, requiring registration of
       firearms, making use of drugs a non-criminal offense, legalizing homosexuality, paying students
       for scholastic achievements, making zoning controls a preserve of the state, offering bonuses
       for family planning and last, but most frightening, a Pol Pot Cambodia-style proposal that new
       communities be established in rural areas, (concentration camp compounds). As can be
       observed, many of their goals have already been more than fully realized.
1.- These institutions are among those that fund The UNIFORM LAW FOUNDATION, whose function is to ensure that the Uniform
Commercial Code remains the instrument for conducting business in the United States.
Back to Top
INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES (IPS)
One of the "Big Three", IFS has shaped and reshaped United States policies, foreign and domestic,
since it was founded by James P. Warburg and the Rothschild entities in the United States. Its networks
in America include the League for Industrial Democracy. Lead players in the League for Industrial
Democracy have included Jeane Kirkpatrick, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, Irwin
Suall of the ADL, Eugene Rostow, Arms control negotiator, Lane Kirkland, Labor Leader, and Albert
Shanker. IFS was incorporated in 1963 by Marcus Raskin and Richard Barnett, both highly trained
Tavistock Institute graduates.
The objectives of IFS came from an agenda laid down for it by the Tavistock Institute, one of the most
notable being to create the "New Left" as a grass roots movement in the U.S. Its been said that Barnett
and Raskin controlled such diverse elements as the Black Panthers, Daniel Ellsberg, National Security
Council staff member Halprin, The Weathermen Underground, the Venceramos and the campaign staff
of candidate George McGovern. No scheme was too big for IFS and its controllers to take on and
manage.

Through its many powerful lobbing groups on Capitol Hill, IFS relentlessly used its "Big Stick" to beat
Congress. IFS has a network of lobbyists, all supposedly operating independently but in actual fact
acting cohesively, so that Congressmen are pummeled from all sides by seemingly different and varied
lobbyists, In this way, IFS was, and is still, able to successfully sway individual Representatives and
Senators to vote for "the trend, the way things are going." By using key point-men on Capitol Hill, IFS
was able to break into the very infrastructure of our legislative system and the way it works.

IFS became, and remains to this day, one of the most prestigious "think tanks" controlling foreign policy
decisions, which we, the people, foolishly believe are those of our law makers.

By sponsoring militant activism at home and with links to revolutionaries abroad, by engineering such
victories as "The Pentagon Papers," besieging the corporate structure, bridging the credibility gap
between underground movements and acceptable political activism, by penetrating religious
organizations and using them to sow discord in America, such as radical racial policies under the guise
of religion, using establishment media to spread IFS ideas, and then supporting them, IFS has lived up
to the role which it was founded to play.
Back to Top

STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Jesse Hobson, the first president of Stanford Research Institute, in a 1952 speech made it clear what
lines the institute was to follow. Stanford can be described as one of the "jewels" in Tavistock's Crown in
its rule over the United States. Founded in 1946 immediately after the close of WWII, it was presided
over by Charles A. Anderson, with emphasis on mind control research and "future sciences." Included
under the Stanford umbrella was Charles F. Kettering Foundation which developed the "Changing
Images of Man" upon which the Aquarian Conspiracy rests.

Some of Stanford's major clients and contracts were at first centered around the defense establishment
but, as Stanford grew, so, did the diversity of its services:
      Applications of Behavioral Sciences to Research Management, Office of Science and
        Technology
      SRI Business Intelligence Program
      U.S. Department of Defense Directorate of Defense Research and Engineering
      U.S. Department of Defense Office of Aerospace Research
Among corporations seeking Stanford's services were Wells Fargo Bank, Bechtel Corporation, Hewlett
Packard, Bank of America, McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Blyth, Eastman Dillon and TRW Company.
One of Stanford's more secret projects was extensive work on chemical and bacteriological warfare
(CAB) weapons.

Stanford Research is plugged into at least 200 smaller "think tanks" doing research into every facet of
life in America. This is ARPA networking and represents the emergence of probably the most far
reaching effort to control the environment of every individual in the country. At present Stanford's
computers are linked with 2500 "sister" research consoles which include:
       the CIA
       Bell Telephone Laboratories
       U.S. Army Intelligence
       The Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI)
       Rand
       MIT
       Harvard
       UCLA
Stanford plays a key role in that it is the "library", cataloging all ARPA documentation.

"Other agencies".....one can use one's imagination here, are allowed to search through SRI's "library" for
key words, phrases, look through sources and update their own master files with those of Stanford
Research Center. The Pentagon uses SRI's master files extensively, and there is little doubt that other
U.S. Government agencies do the same. Pentagon "command and control" problems are worked out by
Stanford.
While ostensibly these apply only to weapons and soldiers, there is absolutely no guarantee that the
same research could not , and will not be turned to civilian applications. Stanford is known to be willing
to do anything for anyone.
Back to Top

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
ALFRED P. SLOAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT
.
This major institute is not generally recognized as being a part of Tavistock U.S.A. Most people look
upon it as being a purely American institution, but that is far from the truth. MIT- Alfred Sloan can be
roughly divided into the following groups:
     Contemporary Technology
     Industrial Relations
     NASA-ERC Computer Research Lavatories
     Office of Naval Research Group, Psychology
     Systems Dynamics
Some of MIT's clients are:
     American Management Association
     Committee for Economic Development (1)
     GTE
     Institute for Defense Analysis (IDA)
     NASA
     National Academy of Sciences
     National Council of Churches
     Sylvania
     TRW
     U.S. Army
     U.S. Department of State
     U.S. Navy
     U.S. Treasury
     Volkswagen Company
1.- These institutions are among those that fund The UNIFORM LAW FOUNDATION, whose function is to ensure that the Uniform
Commercial Code remains the instrument for conducting business in the United States.
Back to Top
RAND RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Without a doubt, RAND is THE think tank most beholden to Tavistock Institute and certainly the RIIA's
most prestigious vehicle for control of United States policies at every level. Specific RAND policies that
became operative include our ICBM program, prime analyses for U.S. foreign policy making, instigator
of space programs, U.S. nuclear policies, corporate analyses, hundreds of projects for the military, the
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in relation to the use of mind altering drugs like peyote, LSD (the
covert MK-ULTRA operation which lasted for 20 years).

Some of RAND's clients include:
    American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T)
    Chase Manhattan Bank
    International Business Machines (IBM)
    National Science Foundation
    Republican Party
    TRW
    U.S. Air Force
    U.S. Department of Health
    U.S. Department of Energy
 There are literally THOUSANDS of highly important companies, government institutions and
 organizations that make use of RANDS's services. To list them all would be impossible. Among RAND's
 specialties is a study group that predicts the timing and the direction of a thermonuclear war, plus
 working out the many scenarios based upon its findings. RAND was once accused of being
 commissioned by the USSR to work out terms of surrender of the United States Government, an
 accusation that went all the way to the United States Senate, where it was taken up by Senator
 Symington and subsequently fell victim to scorn poured out by the establishment press.
 BRAINWASHING remains the primary function of RAND.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_tavistock01.htm




                                              by John Quinn
                                                NewsHawk® inc.
                                                October 10, 1999
                                              from Whale Website
 Today is the birthday of Beatle John Lennon.

 In honor of the man and his wonderful music NewsHawk Inc. has decided to take a look at what was
 going on "behind the scenes" of the 1960's "countercultural revolution"; to explore a bit how the world's
 most popular and undeniably talented rock band was without ANY doubt "used" by New World Order
 social manipulators (as were MANY other pop music groups) in an ongoing project designed to control
 the development of human society in the most fundamental ways.

 There are direct links which tie these activities to certain covert scientific projects of an extremely
 advanced, esoteric nature which were exploring the realms of (manipulation of) consciousness, time,
 thought and indeed "reality" itself, which were being conducted during the same period of time on Long
 Island, N.Y.: activities which were part of the Phoenix/Montauk Project.

 In fact we are talking about two sides of the same coin here. On one side, the covert, subtle
 manipulation and control of not only thought and human consciousness but of the most fundamental,
 subatomic, electromagnetic matrix of (perceived) reality itself, using newly-developed
 electromagnetic/radio frequency technologies of extraordinary, unheard-of power and potential. On the
 other side, directly and overtly shifting the paradigm, changing the basic concepts, widening the
 parameters--the envelope, changing the playing field and all the rules of play by which society defines
 itself within an exceptionally short period of time.

 Factor in what was happening on more political levels such as the civil rights and anti-war movements,
 stir briskly while at full boil, and STAND BACK!

 What's rather amazing in fact is that society did NOT disintegrate/implode/explode in the way the social
 manipulators had apparently hoped. The higher qualities of human nature seemed to consistently
 float to the surface--with some notable exceptions--and certainly began to acquire a significant, if not
 nearly irresistible momentum of it's own; pulling in larger and larger segments, of "straight"',
 conventional, "moral majority" type elements of society. Obviously, the big plan was backfiring severely
 and something "needed to be done."

 The Beatles were also part of the mass experimentation that contemporary society was being subjected
 to by the CIA, Britain's MI6 and the Tavistock Institute utilizing extraordinarily powerful mind-altering
 psychedelic/psychotropic drugs.

 More than most of the other boys in the band, John Lennon became increasingly aware not only of the
 extent of corruption, co-opting and infiltration of the counterculture -- most CERTAINLY including the
 rock music scene -- by these same covert government intelligence elements.

 Lennon was also aware than one of the "big guns" in the CIA/Tavistock/MI6 arsenal, LSD, had been
 having effect upon the population groups to which it had been funneled so extensively that was most
 unexpected on the part of the social manipulators--and to a large extent the effect was rather positive
 and beneficial.

 Shortly before Lennon's death at the hands of what beyond the faintest glimmer of a shadow a doubt
 was a mind-controlled, "Manchurian Candidate" type assassin deployed by Tavistock/CIA/MI6, Mark
 Chapman to terminate a "loose cannon", Lennon had the audacity to massively and blatantly "out" the
 aforementioned consortium in a Playboy interview -- in which he made note of LSD's completely
 unforeseen liberating impact upon human society and civilization--pretty much thumbing his nose at the
 whole bunch and their whole trip; AND indicating as well that he was aware of the extent to which he
 and other pop musicians had been set up--to be used as dupes in massive social manipulation schemes.

 Shortly afterward, New World Order head honcho and Satanist, globalist, CIA chief and Tavistock
 underling vice-president George Bush had Lennon slaughtered on the streets of new York; where he
 died in the arms of someone that a number of sources claim was the monarch agent deployed by
 MI6/CIA to keep the exceptionally intelligent Lennon constantly gravitating toward the social fringe;
 thereby keeping his potential influence at least minimized -- Yoko Ono. That's NOT to say that even IF
 this last supposition is true, that genuine love and a fulfilling relationship did not exist between the two
 and that Yoko's "programming", just like John's, broke up and fell apart.

 And what about those Beatles, anyway? Anyone who has heard the Beatles' live tapes recorded in 1961
 and 1962 on the "Reeperbahn" in Hamburg, Germany realizes that this was an incredibly talented and
 energetic bunch of rockers who no matter what would have undoubtedly had a significant impact upon
 popular music and thus upon society itself, regardless of things which occurred subsequently in their
 saga.

 And without any doubt being given access to state-of-the art audio and recording technologies and
 facilities stimulated their creativity quite a bit--for the benefit of all; "MR. KITE" included.

 Personally I think the Beatles were definitely "the greatest"--or damn close to it.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_tavistock03.htm




                    A Brief Overview Of The Founding Members Of
          The False Memory
         Syndrome Foundation                          from MindControlForum Website
                               F.M.S.F. EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS: Peter and Pamela Freyd
                         (psychiatrists)
                         The Freyds were publicly exposed by their own daughter – Jennifer Freyd
                         (professor of psychology) of child abuse and rape.
                               F.M.S.F. FOUNDER: Ralph Underwager (psychiatrist)
                         The world’s foremost authority on false memory, but in the courtroom – is
                         repeatedly exposed as a charlatan. He is a self confessed paedophile who
                         quotes: It is "God’s Will" adults engage in sex with children.
                               F.M.S.F. ORIGINAL BOARD MEMBERS: Martin Orn (psychiatrist)
                         Senior CIA Mind Control Researcher: Experimenting in hypnotic programming,
                         dissolving memory and other mind subduing techniques.
                               F.M.S.F. BOARD MEMBER: Dr Harold Lief (psychiatrist)
                         CIA Mind Control Researcher. Experimenting in behavioural modification and
                         hypnotic programming.
                         REFERENCE FROM: The False Memory Hoax – Psychic Dictatorship in the USA By Alex
                         Constantine
The CIA, the False Memory Syndrome Foundation & the Politics of
Ritual Abuse
The Devil Denuded

The CIA, in fact, has several designates on the FMSF advisory board. They have in common
backgrounds in mind control experimentation. Their very presence on the board, and their peculiar
backgrounds, reveal some heavily obscured facts about ritual child abuse.

Martin T. Orne, a senior CIA researcher, is an original board members of the Foundation, and a
psychiatrist at the University of Pennsylvania’s Experimental Psychiatry Lab in Philadelphia. In 1962 his
forays into hypno-programming (the elicitation of "anti-social" behaviour, dissolving memory and other
mind-subduing techniques) were financed by a CIA front at Cornell University. He was also funded by
Boston’s Scientific Engineering Institute, another front, and a clearinghouse for the Agency’s
investigation of the occult.

The CIA and Pentagon have formed a partnership in the creation of cults. To be sure, the Association
of National Security Alumni, a public interest veterans group opposed to clandestine ops, considers it a
"primary issue of concern" that the Department of Defense has a "perceived role in satanic cult activities,
which qualify in and of themselves as very damaging exercises in mind control."

The smoothing over of the national security state’s cult connections is handled by academic "experts".

A forerunner of the Foundation is based in Buffalo, New York, the Committee for Scientific Examination
of Religion, best known for the publication of Satanism in America: How the Devil Got More Than His
Due, widely considered to be a legitimate study. The authors turn up their noses to ritual abuse,
dismissing the hundreds of reports around the country as mass "hysteria". Cult researcher Carl
Raschke reported in a March, 1991 article that he coincidentally met Hudson Frew, a Satanism in
America co-author at a Berkeley bookstore.
"Frew was wearing a five-pointed star, or pentagram, the symbol of witchcraft and earth magic,"
Raschke says.
Shawn Carlson, a contributor to the book, is identified by the media as a "physicist". Yet he runs the
Gaia Press in El Cerrito, California, a New Age publishing house with a and occult lore. Carlson is also a
"scientific and technical consultant" to the Committee for Scientific Investigation of Claims of the
Paranormal (a promoter of the "false memory" theory of ritual abuse and UFO abductions), publisher of
the Skeptical Inquirer.

                          The FMS Foundation is no less eccentric. Within two years of its founding, it
                          was clear that the Foundation leadership was far from disinterested on
                          witchcraft
                          On the workings of childhood memory, and concealed a secret sexual and
                          political agenda.

                          FMSF Founder Ralph Underwager (left), director of the Institute of
                          Psychological Therapies in Minnesota, was forced to resign in 1993.
                          Underwager (a former Lutheran pastor) and his wife Hollida Wakefield publish
                          a journal, Issues in Child Abuse Allegations, written by and for child abuse
                          "skeptics".

                           His departure from the False Memory Syndrome Foundation was hastened by
                           a remark in an interview, appearing in an Amsterdam journal for paedophiles,
that it was "God’s Will" adults engage in sex with children.

(His wife Hollida remained on the Foundation’s board after he left). As it happens, holy dispensation for
paedophiles is the exact credo of the Children of God cult. It was fitting, then, when Underwager filed
an affidavit on behalf of cult members tried in France in 1992, insisting that the accused were positively
"not guilty of abuse upon children". In the interview, he prevailed upon paedophiles everywhere to shed
stigmatization as "wicked and reprehensible" users of children.

In keeping with the Foundation’s creative use of statistics, Dr Underwager widely considered, or group
of British reporters in 1994 that "scientific evidence" proved that 60% of all women molested as children
believed the experience was "good for them".

Dr Underwager invariably sides with the defense. His grandiloquent orations have graced courtrooms
around the world, often by satellite. Defense lawyers for Woody Allen turned to him, he boasts, when
Mia Farrow accused her estranged husband of molesting their seven year-old daughter. Underwager is
a virtual icon to the Irish Catholic lobby in Dublin, which raised its hoary hackles against a child abuse
prevention program in the Irish Republic. He was, until his advocacy of paedophila tarnished an
otherwise glittering reputation, widely quoted in the press, dismissing ritual child abuse as a hysterical
aberration.

He is the world’s foremost authority on false memory, but I the courtroom he is repeatedly exposed as a
charlatan. In 1988, a trial court decision in New York State held that Dr Underwager was,
"not qualified to render opinion as to where or not (the victim) was sexually molested".
In 1990 his testimony on memory was ruled improper,
"in the absence of any evidence that the results of Underwager’s work had been accepted in the
scientific community".
And in Minnesota a judge ruled that Underwager’s theories on,
"learned memory" were the same as "having an expert tell the jury that (the victim) was not telling the
truth".
Peter and Pamela Freyd, executive directors of the Foundation, joined forces with Underwager in 1991,
and their story is equally wretched. Jennifer Freyd, their daughter, a professor or psychology at the
University of Oregon, openly leveled accusations of abuse against her parents at an August 1993
mental health conference in Ann Arbor, Michigan.
"My family of origin was troubled in many observable ways," she said. "I refer to the things that were
never ‘forgotten’ and ‘recovered’, but to things that we all knew about".
She gave her father’s alcoholism as an example.
"During my childhood, my father sometimes discussed his own experiences of being sexually abused as
an 11 year-old boy, and called himself a ‘kept boy’".
Peter Freyd graduated to male prostitution as an adolescent. At the age of 13, Jennifer Freyd
composed a poem about her father’s nocturnal visits:
                                          I am caught in a web
                                       A web of deep, deep terror
she wrote. The diaries of her youth chronicle the,
"reactions and feelings (guilt, shame and terror) of a troubled girl and young woman. My parents
oscillated between denying these symptoms and feelings….. to using knowledge of these same
symptoms and feelings to discredit me".

"My father," she says, "told various people that I was brain damaged".
The accusation was unlikely. At the time, Jennifer Freyd was a graduate student on a National Science
Foundation fellowship. She has taught at Cornell and received numerous research awards. The "brain
damage" apologia did not wash. Her mother suggested that Jennifer’s memories were "confabulations"
and faulted therapeutic intervention. Pamela Freyd turned to her own psychiatrist, Dr Harold Lief,
currently and advisory board member of the Foundation, to diagnose Jennifer.

"He explained to me that he did not believe I was abused," Jennifer recalls. Dr Lief’s diagnosis was
based on his belief that Peter Freyd’s fantasies were strictly "homoerotic". Of course, his daughter
furrows a brow at the assumption that homoerotic fantasies or a heterosexual marriage exclude the
possibility of child molestation. Lief’s skewed logic is a trademark of the Foundation.

He is a close colleague of the CIA’s Martin Orne. Dr Lief, a former major in the Army medical corps,
joined the University of Pennsylvania faculty in 1968, the peak of federally-funded behavioural
modification experiments at Holmesburg Prison. Dr Orne consulted with him on several studies in
hypnotic programming.

His academic writing reveals a peculiar range of professional interests, including "Orgasm in the
Postoperative Transsexual" for Archives of Sexual Behaviour, and an exploration of the possibility of life
after death for a journal on mental diseased edited by Foundation fellow Paul McHugh. Lief is a director
of the Centre for Sexuality and Religion, past president of the Sex Information and Education Council.

And an original board member of the False Memory Syndrome Foundation. Two others, Jon Baron
from Penn U. and Ray Hyman (an executive editor of the aforementioned Sceptical Inquirer), a
professor of psychology at the University of Oregon, resigned from the board after Jennifer Freyd went
public with her account of childhood abuse and the facetious attempts of her parents and their therapist
to discredit her. They were replaced by David Dinges, co-director – with the ubiquitous Martin Orne –
of the Unit for Experimental Psychiatry at the University of Pennsylvania.
"At times I am flabbergasted that my memory is considered ‘false’", Jennifer says, "and my alcoholic
father’s memory is considered rational and sane". She does not, after all, remember impossible abuses:
"I was at home a few hours after my second session with my therapist, a licensed clinical psychologist
working within an established group in a large and respected medical clinic.

"During that second visit to my therapist’s office, I expressed great anxiety about the upcoming holiday
visit with my parents. My therapist asked about half way into the session, whether I had ever been
sexually abused. I was immediately thrown into a strange state. No one had ever asked me such a
question. I responded, ‘no, but….’ I went home and within a few hours I was shaking uncontrollably,
overwhelmed with intense and terrible flashbacks". Jennifer asks herself why her parents are believed.
"In the end, is it precisely because I was abused that I am to be discredited despite my personal and
professional success?"
Pamela Freyd published an open letter defending her husband in Ralph Underwager’s Issues in Child
Abuse Accusations in 1991. It was reprinted in Confabulations, a book published a year later. Laced with
lubricious sentiment, the book bemoans the "destruction of families" brought on by false child abuse
accusations, and maligns "cult-like" support groups and feminists, or "lesbian cults". Executive director
 Freyd often refers to the feminist groups that have taken up the cause of child abuse survivors as
 "lesbians", after the bizarre Dr Underwager, who claims,
 "these women may be jealous that males are able to love each other, be comrades, friends, be close,
 intimate".
 Pamela Freyd’s account of the family history, Jennifer insists, is patently false. In an electronic message
 from her father, he openly acknowledges that in his version of the story "fictional elements were
 deliberately inserted".
 "Fictional is rather an astounding choice of words," Jennifer observed at the Ann Arbor Conference. The
 article written by her parents contends that Jennifer was denied tenure at another university due to a
 lack of published research. "In fact," Jennifer counters, "I moved to the University of Oregon in 1987, just
 four years after receiving my Ph.D. to accept a tenured position as associate professor in the
 psychology department, one of the world’s best psychology departments…. My mother sent the Jane
 Doe article to my colleagues during my promotion year – that is, the year my case for promotion to full
 professor was being considered. I was absolutely mortified to learn of this violation of my privacy and
 this violation of the truth".
 Manipulative tactics are another Foundation imprimatur. Lana Alexander, editor of a newsletter for
 survivors of child sexual abuse, observes that,
 "many people view the false memory syndrome theory as a calculated defence strategy developed by
 perpetrators and the lawyers and expert witnesses who defend them".
 A legitimizing barrage of stories in the press has shaped public opinion and warmed the clime for
 defence attorneys. The concept of false memory serves the same purpose as Holocaust denial. It
 shapes opinion. Unconscionable crimes are obstructed, the accused is endowed with the status of
 martyr, the victim is reviled.

 The emphasis on image is obvious in "How Do We Know We are Not Representing Paedophiles", an
 article written for the February 29, 1992 FMS Foundation Newsletter, by Pamela Freyd. In it, she
 derides the suggestion that many members of the group could be molesters because,
 "we are a good-looking bunch of people, greying hair, well dressed, healthy, smiling; just about every
 person who has attended is someone you would surely find interesting and want to count as a friend".


 People forget things. Horrible things. Here at the Foundation someone had a repressed memory, or
 what would be called a repressed memory, that she had been sexually abused.
 – Pamela Freyd, FMS Foundation Founder

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_tavistock04a.htm




                                TARGETS OF THE ILLUMINATI
                                        AND THE
                            COMMITTEE OF 300
     Extracted from "Conspirators’ Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300" by John Coleman
                                    from AmericanPatriotFriendsNetwork Website
 1. To establish a One World Government/New World Order with a unified church and monetary system
 under their direction. The One World Government began to set up its church in the 1920:s and 30:s, for
 they realized the need for a religious belief inherent in mankind must have an outlet and, therefore, set
 up a "church" body to channel that belief in the direction they desired.

 2. To bring about the utter destruction of all national identity and national pride, which was a primary
 consideration if the concept of a One World Government was to work.
3. To engineer and bring about the destruction of religion, and more especially, the Christian Religion,
with the one exception, their own creation, as mentioned above.

4. To establish the ability to control of each and every person through means of mind control and what
Zbignew Brzezinski called techonotronics, which would create human-like robots and a system of
terror which would make Felix Dzerzinhski’s Red Terror look like children at play.

5. To bring about the end to all industrialization and the production of nuclear generated electric power
in what they call "the post-industrial zero-growth society". Excepted are the computer- and service
industries. US industries that remain will be exported to countries such as Mexico where abundant slave
labor is available. As we saw in 1993, this has become a fact through the passage of the North
American Free Trade Agreement, known as NAFTA. Unemployables in the US, in the wake of industrial
destruction, will either become opium-heroin and/or cocaine addicts, or become statistics in the
elimination of the "excess population" process we know of today as Global 2000 Report.

6. To encourage, and eventually legalize the use of drugs and make pornography an "art-form", which
will be widely accepted and, eventually, become quite commonplace.

7. To bring about depopulation of large cities according to the trial run carried out by the Pol Pot regime
in Cambodia. It is interesting to note that Pol Pot’s genocidal plans were drawn up in the US by one of
the Club of Rome’s research foundations, and overseen by Thomas Enders, a high-ranking State
Department official. It is also interesting that the committee is currently seeking to reinstate the Pol Pot
butchers in Cambodia.

8. To suppress all scientific development except for those deemed beneficial by the Illuminati. Especially
targeted is nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. Particularly hated are the fusion experiments currently
being scorned and ridiculed by the Illuminati and its jackals of the press. Development of the fusion torch
would blow the Illuminati’s conception of "limited natural resources" right out of the window. A fusion
torch, properly used, could create unlimited and as yet untapped natural resources, even from the most
ordinary substances. Fusion torch uses are legion, and would benefit mankind in a manner which, as
yet, is not even remotely comprehended by the public.

9. To cause. by means of limited wars in the advanced countries, by means of starvation and diseases
in the Third World countries, the death of three billion people by the year 2050, people they call "useless
eaters". The Committee of 300 (Illuminati) commissioned Cyrus Vance to write a paper on this subject of
how to bring about such genocide. The paper was produced under the title "Global 2000 Report" and
was accepted and approved for action by former President James Earl Carter, and Edwin Muskie,
then Secretary of States, for and on behalf of the US Government. Under the terms of the Global 2000
Report, the population of the US is to be reduced by 100 million by the year of 2050.

10. To weaken the moral fiber of the nation and to demoralize workers in the labor class by creating
mass unemployment. As jobs dwindle due to the post industrial zero growth policies introduced by the
Club of Rome, the report envisages demoralized and discouraged workers resorting to alcohol and
drugs. The youth of the land will be encouraged by means of rock music and drugs to rebel against the
status quo, thus undermining and eventually destroying the family unit. In this regard, the Committee
commissioned Tavistock Institute to prepare a blueprint as to how this could be achieved. Tavistock
directed Stanford Research to undertake the work under the direction of Professor Willis Harmon. This
work later became known as the "Aquarian Conspiracy".

11. To keep people everywhere from deciding their own destinies by means of one created crisis after
another and then "managing" such crises. This will confuse and demoralize the population to the extent
where faced with too many choices, apathy on a massive scale will result. In the case of the US, an
agency for Crisis Management is already in place. It is called the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA), whose existence I first enclosed in 1980.

12. To introduce new cults and continue to boost those already functioning which include rock music
 gangsters such as the Rolling Stones (a gangster group much favored by European Black Nobility),
 and all of the Tavistock-created rock groups which began with the Beatles.

 13. To continue to build up the cult of Christian Fundamentalism begun by the British East India
 Company’s servant Darby, which will be misused to strengthen the Zionist State of Israel by identifying
 with the Jews through the myth of "God’s chosen people", and by donating very substantial amounts of
 money to what they mistakenly believe is a religious cause in the furtherance of Christianity.

 14. To press for the spread of religious cults such as the Moslem Brotherhood, Moslem Fundamentalism,
 the Sikhs, and to carry out mind control experiments of the Jim Jones and "Son of Sam" type. It is worth
 noting that the late Khomeini was a creation of British Military Intelligence Div. 6, MI6. This detailed work
 spelled out the step-by-step process which the US Government implemented to put Khomeini in power.

 15. To export "religious liberation" ideas around the world so as to undermine all existing religions, but
 more especially the Christian religion. This began with the "Jesuit Liberation Theology", that brought an
 end to the Somoza Family rule in Nicaragua, and which today is destroying El Salvador, now 25 years
 into a "civil war". Costa Rica and Honduras are also embroiled in revolutionary activities, instigated by
 the Jesuits. One very active entity engaged in the so-called liberation theology, is the Communist-
 oriented Mary Knoll Mission. This accounts for the extensive media attention to the murder of four of
 Mary Knoll’s so-called nuns in El Salvador a few years ago. The four nuns were Communist subversive
 agents and their activities were widely documented by the Government of El Salvador. The US press
 and the new media refused to give any space or coverage to the mass of documentation possessed by
 the Salvadorian Government, which proved what the Mary Knoll Mission nuns were doing in the country.
 Mary Knoll is in service in many countries, and placed a leading role in bringing Communism to
 Rhodesia, Moçambique, Angola and South Africa.

 16. To cause a total collapse of the world’s economies and engender total political chaos.

 17. To take control of all foreign and domestic policies of the US.

 18. To give the fullest support to supranational institutions such as the United Nations, the International
 Monetary Fund (IMF), the Bank of International Settlements, the World Court and, as far as possible,
 make local institutions less effective, by gradually phasing them out or bringing them under the mantle of
 the UN.

 19. To penetrate and subvert all governments, and work from within them to destroy the sovereign
 integrity of the nations represented by them.

 20. To organize a world-wide terrorist apparatus and to negotiate with terrorists whenever terrorist
 activities take place. It will be recalled that it was Bettino Craxi, who persuaded the Italian and US
 Governments to negotiate with the Red Brigades kidnapers of Prime Minister Moro and General Dozier.
 As an aside, Dozier was placed under strict orders not to talk what happened to him. Should he ever
 break that silence, he will no doubt be mad "a horrible example of", in the manner in which Henry
 Kissinger dealt with Aldo Moro, Ali Bhutto and General Zia ul Haq.

 21. To take control of education in America with the intent and purpose of utterly and completely
 destroying it. By 1993, the full force effect of this policy is becoming apparent, and will be even more
 destructive as primary and secondary schools begin to teach "Outcome Based Education" (OBE).

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_illuminati_12c.htm
                         WHO IS MAURICE STRONG?
         The adventures of Maurice Strong & Co. illustrate the fact that
     nowadays you don’t have to be a household name to wield global power.
                                              by Ronald Bailey
                                         Published in The National Review
                                                September 1, 1997
                                               from Resist Website

                         Mr. Bailey is a freelance journalist and television producer in
                                        Washington, D.C. He is author of
                           Eco-Scam: The False Prophets of Ecological Apocalypse
                                                       and
                                  The True State of the Planet (Free Press).

 "The survival of civilization in something like its present form might depend significantly on the efforts of
a single man," declared The New Yorker. The New York Times hailed that man as the "Custodian of the
                                                                    Planet."
                             He is perpetually on the short list of candidates for Secretary General of the
                             United Nations. This lofty eminence? Maurice Strong, of course.
                             Never heard of him? Well, you should have. Militia members are famously
                             worried that black helicopters are practicing maneuvers with blue-helmeted UN
                             troops in a plot to take over America.
                             But the actual peril is more subtle. A small cadre of obscure international
                             bureaucrats are hard at work devising a system of "global governance" that is
                             slowly gaining control over ordinary Americans’ lives. Maurice Strong, a 68-
                             year-old Canadian, is the "indispensable man" at the center of this creeping
                             UN power grab.
                             Not that Mr. Strong looks particularly indispensable. Indeed, he exudes a kind
                             of negative charisma. He is a grey, short, soft-voiced man with a salt-and-
                             pepper toothbrush mustache who wouldn’t rate a second glance if you passed
him on the street. Yet his remarkable career has led him from boyhood poverty in Manitoba to the
highest councils of international government.

Among the hats he currently wears are:
     Senior Advisor to UN Secretary General Kofi Annan
     Senior Advisor to World Bank President James Wolfensohn
     Chairman of the Earth Council
     Chairman of the World Resources Institute
     Co-Chairman of the Council of the World Economic Forum
     member of Toyota’s International Advisory Board
As advisor to Kofi Annan, he is overseeing the new UN reforms.
Yet his most prominent and influential role to date was as Secretary General of the 1992 UN Conference
on Environment and Development - the so-called Earth Summit - held in Rio de Janeiro, which gave a
significant push to global economic and environmental regulation.
"He’s dangerous because he’s a much smarter and shrewder man [than many in the UN system],"
comments Charles Lichenstein, deputy ambassador to the UN under President Reagan. "I think he is a
very dangerous ideologue, way over to the Left."

"This guy is kind of the global Ira Magaziner," says Ted Galen Carpenter, vice president for defense and
foreign-policy studies at the Cato Institute. "If he is whispering in Kofi Annan’s ear this is no good at all."
Strong attracts such mystified suspicion because he is difficult to pin down. He told Maclean’s in 1976
that he was "a socialist in ideology, a capitalist in methodology."
And his career combines oil deals with the likes of Adnan Khashoggi with links to the environmentalist
Left. He is in fact one of a new political breed: the bi-sectoral entrepreneur who uses business success
for leverage in politics, and vice versa.

Strong started in the oil business in the 1950s. He took over and turned around some small ailing energy
companies in the 1960s, and he was president of a major holding company -- the Power Corporation of
Canada -- by the age of 35. This was success by any standard. Yet on more than one occasion
(including once in Who’s Who),
Strong has been caught exaggerating. He claimed, for instance, to have forfeited a $200,000 salary
when he left Power. The real figure, said a company officer, was $35,000. Why this myth-making? Well,
a CEO is just a CEO -- but a whiz-kid is a potential cabinet officer.

And it is in politics that Strong’s talents really shine. He is the Michelangelo of networking. He early
made friends in high places in Canada’s Liberal Party -- including Paul Martin Sr., Canada’s external-
affairs minister in the Sixties -- and kept them as business partners in oil and real-estate ventures.
He cultivated bright well-connected young people -- like Paul Martin Jr., Canada’s present finance
minister and the smart money’s bet to succeed Jean Chretien as prime minister -- and salted them
throughout his various political and business networks to form a virtual private intelligence service. And
he always seemed to know what the next political trend would be -- foreign aid, Canadian economic
nationalism, environmentalism.

In 1966, by now a Liberal favorite, Strong became head of the Canadian International Development
Agency and thus was launched internationally. Impressed by his work at CIDA, UN Secretary General U
Thant asked him to organize what became the first Earth Summit - the Stockholm Conference on the
Human Environment in 1972.
The next year, Strong became first director of the new UN Environment Program, created as a result of
Stockholm. And in 1975, he was invited back to Canada to run the semi-national Petro-Canada, created
by Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau in the wake of OPEC’s oil shocks.

Petro-Canada was a sop to Canada’s anti-American Left, then denouncing American ownership of the
country’s oil companies. Strong talked a good economic-nationalist game -- but he himself was a major
reason why Canada’s oil companies were U.S.-owned. Ten years before, while at Power Corporation,
he had enabled Shell to take over the only remaining all-Canadian oil company by throwing a controlling
block of shares in its direction. As Maclean’s wrote, he now returned "amid fanfares" to rectify this.

After a couple of years, Strong left Petro-Canada for various business deals, including one with Adnan
Khashoggi through which he ended up owning the 200,000-acre Baca ranch in Colorado, now a
"New Age" center run by his wife, Hanne. (Among the seekers at Baca are Zen and Tibetan Buddhist
monks, a breakaway order of Carmelite nuns, and followers of a Hindu guru called Babaji.)
Not for long the joys of contemplation, however. In 1985, he was back as executive coordinator of the
UN Office for Emergency Operations in Africa, in charge of running the $3.5-billion famine-relief effort in
Somalia and Ethiopia. And in 1989, he was appointed Secretary General of the Earth Summit -- shortly
thereafter flying down to Rio.

Strong’s flexibility, however, must not be mistaken for open-mindedness. His friends, his allies among
Canadian Liberals, his networks in the UN and the Third World, even his long-term business partners
(like the late Paul Nathanson, wartime treasurer of the Canadian-Soviet Friendship Committee) all lean
Left. He has said the Depression left him "frankly very radical." And given his ability to get things done,
the consistency of his support for a world managed by bureaucrats is alarming.
As Elaine Dewar wrote in Toronto’s Saturday Night magazine:
It is instructive to read Strong’s 1972 Stockholm speech and compare it with the issues of Earth Summit
1992. Strong warned urgently about global warming, the devastation of forests, the loss of biodiversity,
polluted oceans, the population time bomb. Then as now, he invited to the conference the brand-new
environmental NGOs [non-governmental organizations]: he gave them money to come; they were
invited to raise hell at home. After Stockholm, environment issues became part of the administrative
framework in Canada, the U.S., Britain, and Europe.
IN the meantime, Strong continued the international networking on which his influence rests.
He became a member of the World Commission on Environment and Development (the Brundtland
Commission). He found time to serve as president of the World Federation of United Nations
Associations, on the executive committee of the Society for International Development, and as an
advisor to the Rockefeller Foundation and the World Wildlife Fund. Above all, he served on the
Commission on Global Governance -- which, as we shall see, plays a crucial part in the international
power grab.

Sometimes, indeed, it seems that Strong’s network of contacts must rival the Internet. To list a few:
     Vice President Al Gore. (Of course)
     World Bank President James Wolfensohn, formerly on the Rockefeller Foundation Board and
         currently on the Population Council Board; he was Al Gore’s favored candidate for the World
         Bank position
     James Gustave Speth, head of the Carter Administration’s Council on Environmental Quality,
         crafter of the doomladen Global 2000 report, member of the Clinton - Gore transition team; he
         now heads the UN Development Program
     Shridath Ramphal, formerly Secretary General of the (British) Commonwealth, now Co-Chairman
         of the Commission on Global Governance
     Jonathan Lash, President of the World Resources Institute -- which works closely with the World
         Bank, the UN Environment Program, and the UN Development Program -- and Co-Chairman of
         the President’s Council on Sustainable Development
     Ingvar Carlsson, former Swedish prime minister and Co-Chairman of the Commission on Global
         Governance.
But Strong is no snob; he even counts Republican Presidents among his friends. Elaine Dewar again:
Strong blurted out that he’d almost been shut out of the Earth Summit by people at the State
Department. They had been overruled by the White House because George Bush knew him. He said
that he’d donated some $100,000 to the Democrats and a slightly lesser amount to the Republicans in
1988. (The Republicans didn’t confirm.)
I had been absolutely astonished. I mean yes, he had done a great deal of business in the U.S., but how
could he have managed such contributions?

Well, he’d had a green card. The governor of Colorado had suggested it to him. A lawyer in Denver had
told him how.

But why? I’d asked.
"Because I wanted influence in the United States."
So Strong gave political contributions (of dubious legality) to both parties; George Bush, now a friend,
intervened to help him stay in charge of the Rio conference; he was thereby enabled to set a deep green
agenda there; and Bush took a political hit in an election year. An instructive tale -- if it is not part of
Strong’s mythmaking.

Most of Strong’s friends are more obviously compatible, which may explain why they tend to overlap in
their institutional commitments.
For example, James Wolfensohn (whom Strong had hired out of Harvard in the early Sixties to run an
Australian subsidiary of one of his companies) appointed him as his senior advisor almost immediately
upon being named chairman of the World Bank.
"I’d been involved in... Stockholm, which Maurice Strong arranged," says Wolfensohn, who, more
recently, has been credited with co-drafting (with Mikhail Gorbachev) the Earth Charter presented for
consideration at the Rio + 5 meeting in Brazil earlier this year.
As head of the Earth Council, Maurice Strong chaired that meeting. It’s not a conspiracy, of course: just
a group of like-minded people fighting to save the world from less prescient and more selfish forces --
namely, market forces. And though the crises change -- World War II in the Forties, fear of the atom
bomb in the Fifties, the "energy crisis" in the Seventies -- the Left’s remedy is always the same: a
greater role for international agencies.
Today an allegedly looming global environmental catastrophe is behind their efforts to increase the
power of the UN. Strong has warned memorably:
"If we don’t change, our species will not survive... Frankly, we may get to the point where the only way of
saving the world will be for industrial civilization to collapse."
Apocalypse soon - unless international bodies save us from ourselves.

LAST week, Secretary General Annan unveiled Maurice Strong’s plan for reorganizing the UN. To be
sure, the notoriously corrupt and inefficient UN bureaucracy could do with some shaking up. Strong’s
plan, however, mostly points in a different direction - one drawn from a document, Our Global
Neighborhood, devised by the interestingly named Commission on Global Governance.

The CGG was established in 1992, after Rio, at the suggestion of Willy Brandt, former West German
chancellor and head of the Socialist International. Then Secretary General Boutros Boutros-Ghali
endorsed it.
The CGG naturally denies advocating the sort of thing that fuels militia nightmares.
"We are not proposing movement toward a world government," reassuringly write Co-Chairmen Ingvar
Carlsson and Shridath Ramphal, "... [but] this is not to say that the goal should be a world without
systems or rules."
Quite so. As Hofstra University law professor Peter Spiro describes it:
"The aim is not a superstate but rather the establishment of norm-creating multilateral regimes . . . This
construct already constrains state action in the context of human rights and environmental protection
and is on a springboard in other areas."
The concept of global governance has been fermenting for some time. In 1991, the Club of Rome (of
which Strong is, of course, a member) issued a report called The First Global Revolution, which
asserted that current problems,
"are essentially global and cannot be solved through individual country initiatives [which] gives a greatly
enhanced importance to the United Nations and other international systems."
Also in 1991 Strong claimed that the Earth Summit, of which he was Secretary General, would play an
important role in,
"reforming and strengthening the United Nations as the centerpiece of the emerging system of
democratic global governance."
In 1995, in Our Global Neighborhood, the CGG agreed:
"It is our firm conclusion that the United Nations must continue to play a central role in global
governance."
Americans should be worried by the Commission’s recommendations: for instance, that some UN
activities be funded through taxes on foreign-exchange transactions and multinational corporations.
Economist James Tobin estimates that a 0.5 per cent tax on foreign-exchange transactions would raise
$1.5 trillion annually - nearly equivalent to the U.S. federal budget.

It also recommended that "user fees" might be imposed on companies operating in the "global
commons." Such fees might be collected on international airline tickets, ocean shipping, deep-sea
fishing, activities in Antarctica, geostationary satellite orbits, and electromagnetic spectrum. But the big
enchilada is carbon taxes, which would be levied on all fuels made from coal, oil, and natural gas.
"A carbon tax," the report deadpans, "... would yield very large revenues indeed."
Given the UN’s record of empire-building and corruption, Cato’s Ted Carpenter warns:
"One can only imagine the degree of mischief it could get into if it had independent sources of revenue."
Especially significant for the U.S. was the CGG’s proposal for eventual elimination of the veto held by
the five permanent members of the UN Security Council. The Commission knew that the current
permanent members of the Security Council, including the U.S., would not easily surrender their vetoes,
and so it recommended a two-stage process.

In the first stage, five new permanent members (without a veto) would be added to the Security Council -
- probably Japan, Germany, Brazil, India, and Nigeria -- along with three new slots for non-permanent
members.
But the real threat to U.S. interests is the second stage:
"a full review of the membership of the Council... around 2005, when the veto can be phased out."
These plans are advancing. In March, the president of the UN General Assembly, Razali Ismail of
Malayasia, unveiled his own formula for reforming the Security Council. It closely tracks the CGG’s
proposals.
In particular, Razali proposed,
"urg[ing] the original permanent members to limit use of the veto... and not to extend [it] to new
permanent members."
He wanted to make the veto "progressively and politically untenable" and recommended that these
arrangements be reviewed in ten years.

In July the State Department compromised -- accepting five new Security Council members but
remaining silent on the veto. It plainly hopes that the veto issue will go away if the U.S. concedes on
enlarging the Council. Yet the CGG’s report makes clear that we are facing a rolling agenda to expand
the power of UN bureaucrats. The veto issue may be postponed for ten years -- but what then?

"This is an initiative that should be resisted by the United States with special vehemence," says Ted
Carpenter. For if the veto were eliminated, the United States would face the prospect of having other
countries make key determinations that affect us without our consent.

The Commission also wants to strengthen "global civil society," which, it explains, "is best expressed in
the global non-governmental movement." Today, there are nearly 15,000 NGOs. More than 1,200 of
them have consultative status with the UN’s Economic and Social Council (up from 41 in 1948).
The CGG wants NGOs to be brought formally into the UN system (no wonder Kenneth Minogue calls
this Acronymia). So it proposes that representatives of such organizations be accredited to the General
Assembly as "Civil Society Organizations" and convened in an annual Forum of Civil Society.

But how would these representatives be selected? This June, the General Assembly held a session on
environmental issues called Earth Summit +5.
President Razali selected a number of representatives from the NGOs and the private sector for the
exclusive privilege of speaking in the plenary sessions.
"I have gone to a lot of trouble with this, choosing the right NGOs," he declared.
So whom did he choose?

Among others:
     Thilo Bode, executive director of Greenpeace, to represent the scientific and technological
        community
     Yolanda Kakabadse, the president of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature
     "from the farmers, I have chosen an organic farmer, Denise O’Brien from the United States, who
        is a member of the Via Campesina."
In what sense are these people "representative"? Whom do they represent? Were the head of the U.S.
Chamber of Commerce, the chairman of Toshiba, and the president of the Farm Bureau all too busy to
come talk to the General Assembly?

Another example of how this selection process operates was the "great civil society forum" convened at
the behest of Strong’s Earth Council and Mikhail Gorbachev’s Green Cross International this past March.
Some five hundred delegates met, supposedly to assess the results of the Earth Summit, but in reality to
condemn the "inaction" of signatory countries in implementing the Rio treaties.
The delegates were selected through a process based on national councils for sustainable development,
themselves set up pursuant to the Earth Summit. Membership in these councils means that an
organization is already persuaded of the global environmental crisis. So you can bet that the process did
not yield many delegates representing business or advocating limits on government power.

This kind of international gabfest is, of course, a sinister parody of democracy.
"Very few of even the larger international NGOs are operationally democratic, in the sense that
members elect officers or direct policy on particular issues," notes Peter Spiro.
"Arguably it is more often money than membership that determines influence, and money more often
represents the support of centralized elites, such as major foundations, than of the grass roots."
(The CGG has benefited substantially from the largesse of the MacArthur, Carnegie, and Ford
Foundations.)
Hilary French, Vice President of the alarmist Worldwatch Institute, justifies this revealingly as,
"a paradox of our time . . . that effective governance requires control being simultaneously passed down
to local communities and up to international institutions."
Paradoxically or not, the voters hardly appear in this model of governance. It bypasses national
governments and representative democracy in order to empower the sort of people who are willing to sit
in committee meetings to the bitter end. Those who have better things to do - businessmen, workers,
moms - would be the losers in the type of centralized decentralization envisioned by Worldwatch. The
result would be decisions reached by self-selecting elites. In domestic politics, we have a name for such
elite groups - special interests.

ANOTHER CGG recommendation is that the old UN Trusteeship Council "be given a new mandate over
the global commons." It defines the global commons to include the atmosphere, outer space, the oceans
beyond national jurisdiction, and the related environmental systems that contribute to the support of
human life.
A new Trusteeship Council would oversee,
"the management of the commons, including development and use of their resources... [and] the
administration of environmental treaties in such fields as climate change, biodiversity, outer space, and
the Law of the Sea."
It is hard to see what this expansive definition would exclude from the jurisdiction of the Trusteeship
Council. Biodiversity encompasses all the plants and animals on the earth, including those that live in
your backyard. Will UN troops swoop in to stop you from cutting down trees on your property? Doubtless
not. But a recent case near Yellowstone National Park may be a foretaste of how international agencies
can meddle in U.S. domestic affairs.

Yellowstone has been designated a "World Heritage Site."
These Sites are natural settings or cultural monuments recognized by the World Heritage Committee of
the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) as having "outstanding
universal value." Sites are designated under a Convention ratified by the U.S. Senate in 1973, and it is
possible to place such sites on a "List of World Heritage Sites in Danger."

In this case, a mining company wanted to construct a gold mine outside the boundaries of Yellowstone.
The normal environmental review of the project’s impact was still proceeding under U.S. law. But a
group of environmentalist NGOs opposed to the mine were not content to wait for that review to take its
course. They asked that members of the World Heritage Committee come to Yellowstone to hold public
hearings.
George Frampton, the Clinton Administration’s Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Fish, Wildlife, and
Parks, wrote to the WHC saying:
"The Secretary [Bruce Babbitt] and the National Park Service have clearly expressed strong
reservations with the New World Mine proposal."
Frampton added:
"We believe that a potential danger to the values of the Park and surrounding waters and fisheries exists
and that the committee should be informed that the property as inscribed on the . . . List is in danger."
Four officials of the WHC duly came to Yellowstone and held hearings. And at its December 1995
meeting in Berlin, the Committee obligingly voted to list Yellowstone as a "World Heritage Site in
Danger."
"It was, in my opinion, a blatantly political act," declared Rep. Barbara Cubin (R., Wyo.) during
congressional hearings about the listing.
"It was done to draw attention, public reaction, public response, and public pressure to see that the mine
wasn’t developed."
Jeremy Rabkin, a Cornell political scientist, agrees that the international listing of such sites "provides
an international forum through which to put pressure on U.S. policy."

Would the mine really have endangered Yellowstone? We’ll never know. The environmental-impact
statement was never issued, and, under pressure, the mining company accepted a $65-million federal
buyout plus a trade for unspecified federal lands somewhere else. Thus, even with no enforcement
power, this UN dependency was able to make land-use policy for the United States.

These events prompted Rep. Don Young (R., Alaska) to introduce the American Land Sovereignty Act.
With 174 co-sponsors to date, the Act aims to
"preserve sovereignty of the United States over public lands and... to preserve State sovereignty and
private property rights in non-federal lands surrounding those public lands."
Congress would have to approve on a case-by-case basis land designations made pursuant to any
international agreements.

But is U.S. sovereignty really in danger? In an interview, Strong dismissed Young’s anxieties.
"I do not share his concern. It is no abdication of sovereignty to exercise it in company with others, and
when you’re dealing with global issues that’s what you have to do." He continues: "If you put yourself in
a larger unit, of course, you get some advantages and you give up some of your freedom. And that’s
what’s happening in Europe, that the states of Europe have decided that overall they’re better off to
create a structure in which they give up some of their national rights and exercise them collectively
through the Union."
This example of the European Union, however, worries Ambassador Lichenstein.
The EU’s bureaucracy in Brussels, he complains,
"is responsible to no one. Governments get together -- foreign ministers, finance ministers -- they
presumably hand down the guidelines, but don’t kid yourself, the bureaucrats are running things."
The Yellowstone case is an example of how "feel-good" symbolism about the environment can be
transformed into real constraints upon real people imposed outside the law, with no democratic
oversight and no means of redress.
Ironically, Strong himself had a run-in with Colorado environmentalists over local water rights. They did
not have the wit to call in an international agency against the New Age rancher -- or maybe they realized
that Strong was one property owner whose rights the UN would respect.

As troubling as the Yellowstone incident is, much greater potential for mischief lies in a new series of
"framework treaties" designed to handle global environmental issues. Initially, the treaties called for
voluntary actions by governments and set up a consultative process.
But environmental activists like Hilary French know very well how this process works.
"Even though it can look disappointing, the political will created [by these framework conventions] can
lead to commitments of a more binding nature," she said.
This is already happening.
"Although its declaration of principles was transparently aspirational, the 1972 Stockholm world
conference on the human environment is generally recognized as a turning point in international
environmental-protection efforts," wrote Peter Spiro.
"From it emerged a standing institution (the UN Environment Program); weak but more
focused ’framework’ treaties followed, which in turn are being filled out by specific regulatory regimes.
The 1985 Vienna Convention on the Protection of the Ozone Layer itself included no obligations, but the
1987 Montreal protocols and subsequent amendments set a full phase-out of chlorofluorocarbons
(CFCs) and other ozone-depleting substances by 1996.
The regime covers 132 signatories with a total population of 4.7 billion people. Between 1987 and 1991,
global CFC consumption was in fact reduced by half. A similar filling-out process is likely to occur with
the biodiversity and climate-change conventions signed at Rio."
The "conventions" that Spiro was talking about emerged from the Earth Summit chaired by Maurice
Strong. They deal with two of the alleged global environmental crises -- global warming and species
extinction.

At the time of the Earth Summit, some scientists predicted on the basis of climate computer models that
the earth’s average temperature would increase by 4 to 9 degrees Fahrenheit over the next century
because of the "greenhouse effect." These predictions are controversial among scientists. And as the
computer models are refined, they show that the atmosphere will warm far less than originally predicted.
Furthermore, more accurate satellite measurements show no increase in the average global
temperature over the last two decades.
Finally, an important study published in Nature concluded that even if the warming predictions are right,
it could well be less costly to allow greenhouse gas emissions to continue to rise for a decade or more
because technological innovations and judicious capital investment will make it possible to reduce them
far more cheaply at some point before they become a significant problem. In other words, we needn’t
take drastic and costly action now.

The process forges ahead anyway. The Framework Convention on Global Climate Change signed by
President George Bush at the Rio Earth Summit is already beginning to harden. Initially, countries were
supposed voluntarily to reduce by the year 2000 the "greenhouse gases" to the level emitted in 1990.
Then, a year ago, at a UN climate-change meeting in Geneva, the Clinton Administration offered to set
legally binding limits on the greenhouse gases the United States can emit. In June of this year, at the
UN’s Earth Summit +5 session, President Clinton reaffirmed this commitment. And mandatory limits on
carbon emissions are to be finalized at a global meeting of Convention signatories in Kyoto this
December.

Estimates of the costs to the United States of cutting emissions range from $90 billion to $400 billion
annually in lost Gross Domestic Product and a loss of between 600,000 and 3.5 million jobs. Global
costs would be proportionately higher.

Yet while the U.S. may be committing itself to limits, 130 developing nations, including China and India,
are excluded under the Framework Convention from having to reduce their emissions, which, on present
trends, will outstrip those of the industrialized world early in the next century. If the U.S. and other
industrial countries have to limit energy use while the Third World is exempt, many industries will simply
decamp to where energy prices are significantly lower.

If they are permitted to do so. For, as Sen. Chuck Hagel (R., Neb.) asked at a conference on "The
Costs of Kyoto" held by the Competitive Enterprise Institute:
"Who will administer a global climate treaty?... Will we have an international agency capable of
inspecting, fining, and possibly shutting down American companies?"
Sen. Hagel is not alone is his concern. In July the U.S. Senate passed 95 to 0 a resolution urging the
Clinton Administration not to make binding concessions at the Kyoto conference.

But the climate-change treaty is not the only threat to U.S. interests. Though Mr. Bush refused to sign
the Bio-diversity Convention at the Rio Earth Summit -- chaired, remember, by GOP contributor Strong -
- that only delayed things. The Clinton Administration signed shortly after its inauguration. Since the
treaty obliges signatories to protect plant and animal species through habitat preservation, its
implementation could make the World Heritage Committee’s activities on U.S. land use seem penny-
ante by comparison.

MEANWHILE, how much further down the path sketched out by the CGG will the UN reforms developed
by Maurice Strong and announced by Kofi Annan last week take us?

The most important initiative is the recommendation that the General Assembly organize a "Millennium
Assembly" and a companion "People’s Assembly" in the year 2000. (The "People’s Assembly" mirrors
the CGG’s "Civil Society Forum" idea -- among other things, only accredited NGOs would be invited to
advise the General Assembly.) But what would these grand new bodies actually do?
The Millennium Assembly would invite,
"heads of Government... to articulate their vision of prospects and challenges for the new millennium
and agree on a process for fundamental review of the role of the United Nations."
That last innocuous phrase is diplomatese for opening up the UN Charter for amendment. If that
happens, so could anything -- notably eliminating the veto in the Security Council.

The Millennium Assembly would also consider adopting Strong’s Earth Charter. For the most part the
Charter reads like another feel-good document -- its draft says that "we must reinvent industrial-
technological civilization" and promises everybody a clean environment, equitable incomes, and an end
 to cruelty to animals -- but we have seen how such vacuous symbolism can have real consequences
 down the line.
 Inevitably, the Charter advocates that,
 "the nations of the world should adopt as a first step an international convention that provides an
 integrated legal framework for existing and future environmental and sustainable-development law and
 policy."
 This is, of course, a charter for endless intervention in the internal affairs of independent states.

 Which leaves external affairs. Hey presto! In line with the CGG’s plan, Annan/Strong urge that the UN
 Trusteeship Council,
 "be reconstituted as the forum through which member states exercise their collective trusteeship for the
 integrity of the global environment and common areas such as the oceans, atmosphere, and outer
 space."
 For the time being, however, Annan and Strong have avoided calling for global taxes or user fees to
 finance the UN.
 One spokesman said that the issue was simply "too hot to handle right now." What they propose is a
 Revolving Credit Fund of $1 billion so that the UN will have a source of operating funds even if a major
 contributor (e.g., the U.S.) withholds contributions for a time. In short, the CGG’s blueprint for a more
 powerful UN closely resembles the movement to expand the requirements of the Framework Convention
 on Global Climate Change.
 While the process may be piecemeal, the goal is clear: a more powerful set of international institutions,
 increasingly emancipated from the control of the major powers, increasingly accountable not to
 representative democratic institutions but to unelected bureaucracies, and increasingly exercising
 authority over how people, companies, and governments run their affairs -- not just Americans, but
 everyone. In short, Col. Qaddafi’s definition of his leftist Green Revolution: "Committees Everywhere."

 If so, the future looks good for Maurice Strong. One UN source suggested that, at the very least, he
 would like to be made Secretary General of the Millennium Assembly or the People’s Assembly. Others
 suspect that, even at age 68, Strong is angling to be the next UN Secretary General.

 Such eminence may help explain a puzzling incident in his early career. Having long had political
 ambitions, he decided to enter the Canadian Parliament. A candidate was evicted from a safe
 constituency by the Liberal leadership, and Strong moved in.
 Then, with only a month to go before the 1979 election, he suddenly pulled out of the race. Strong’s
 business deals were especially complicated at the time -- he was setting up a Swiss oil-and-gas
 exploration company with partners that included the Kuwaiti Finance Minister and the Arab Petroleum
 Investment Corporation -- and that is the explanation usually given.
 But maybe he just decided that for a man who wants power, elections are an unnecessary obstacle.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_tavistock04b.htm

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:35
posted:11/20/2012
language:English
pages:93