Docstoc

Guy Oppenheim The Inevitable Trek to Tyranny

Document Sample
Guy Oppenheim The Inevitable Trek to Tyranny Powered By Docstoc
					Guy Oppenheim The Inevitable Trek to Tyranny
By Toby Birch & Guy Oppenheim

Oppenheim & Co. Limited

“It is a mistake to look too far ahead. Only one link in the chain of destiny can be handled at a
time”.

 This quote from Sir Winston Churchill is something of a surprise given that he was a lone voice
opposing the appeasement of Germany prior to WWII. He did have a point about forecasting
though. Few leaders seem capable of considering the consequences of their actions – especially
the unintended variety. Reaction rather than action appears prevalent. While we are not all
blessed with investment insight or prophetic visions, we can at least take time to look at the
past. Comparisons with the 1930s are highly valid but there is little reason to expect an exact
repetition. A domino-effect is too neat and orderly a description for events over the last 5 years
that resemble a slow-motion motorway pile-up.

 Others have kindly described our book as one of the most prescient predictions of the credit
crisis when it was published in 2007 (The Final Crash: Addictive Debt and the Deformation of
the World Economy). It compared the build up of debt to drug dependency, dividing the phases
into three parts, namely Party Time, Hangover then Detox and Rehab. With a little knowledge
of history it was straightforward to run through a dress rehearsal of how the crash would
evolve and escalate into other crises. At the time it was understandable to be belittled by
doubters or worse still, ignored. At least one can hope that the author has credibility to make
some comment on the future. The chapter entitled 2020 Vision ran through a scenario where a
crash led to higher taxes, inflation and greater protectionism. It made the case that in times of
economic distress politics will tend to swing to the far left and right and of course a common
enemy must be pin-pointed and persecuted. Leaders down the ages have used such tricks to
crush dissent and unite the populace through scaremongering. Little has changed.

 While President Roosevelt may justifiably be criticized for banning the public ownership of gold
before devaluing the dollar during the Great Depression, he was at least correct in
implementing banking reform, following the Wall Street Crash of 1929. Modern investigative
committees appear to be a pale imitation of interrogators of the day like Ferdinand Pecora who
exposed the double-speak of financiers with utter determination. The subsequent
implementation of the 1933 Glass-Steagall Act clearly delineated retail banking from its much
riskier investment banking cousin. After many attempts this was repealed in 1999 with the
naive tech-bubble view that modern folk were far more sophisticated than their ancestors. We
can now appreciate the shallowness of this philosophy as banks once more mutated into
speculative monsters. The lending mechanism is now broken; why should banks bother to lend
money to real businesses when they can borrow cheaply from the central bank (a right not
extended to governments) and use funds to buy bonds for a risk-free ride, funded by the tax
payer.
 History shows us that the very act of allowing reckless financial institutions to collapse is far
healthier than allowing zombie banks to drag down the rest of the economy. Whether by lobby
group pressure, Party funding or a simple lack of knowledge, politicians of all hues have fallen
for the mantra that saving the banks will save the economy. This is best illustrated through
humour than vitriol. In one episode of BBC’s ‘Blackadder’, an Elizabethan quack doctor
recommends continued bleeding by leeches for a pallid patient. The doctor cites counsel from
the highest medical authority; who just happens own the largest leech farm in Europe. A
similar quality of financial advice has been provided for the last 5 years by a clique of central
banks, regulators and ‘industry experts’ from the same stable. Interestingly, one of the best
success stories of bypassing the banking system occurred in Guernsey, transforming the island
from debt-trap penury into a model of prosperity. The States committee consisted neither of
lawyers nor bankers but entrepreneurial merchants who used interest-free finance for the
benefit of the Bailiwick.

 Other echoes of the Great Depression centre on the emergence of trade tariffs and
nationalistic behaviour. With the break-up of the Gold Standard, free-floating currencies caused
chaos as every country adopted beggar-thy-neighbour policies of devaluation to gain a
competitive pricing edge. Now, as then, the race to the bottom for currency weakness will
eventually generate significant inflation; temporarily masked by a lack of credit creation in the
banking system. World trade thrives on currency and financial stability which is what the Gold
Standard delivered for much of the Victorian Age, albeit with some crises along the way. So why
is this relevant today? If you mix the same ingredients together you will usually get a similar-
tasting cake. In other words, by combining protectionist policies with political polarization,
tension and commodity-driven conflict are the likely end-result.

 Many would argue that the lessons have been learned and that the prospect of totalitarian era
is incomprehensible. After all, our children seem to study little else apart from Hitler in history
lessons. While it is all well and good to analyze at the end result of tyranny, unless one
understands its cause then dictatorship it is destined to be repeated. If anything we are in a
worse position than the 1930’s as we have the perfect infrastructure to control, monitor and
isolate individuals both financially and physically. The one-way extradition flow of Britons to
America is a good example of such injustice where anti-terror legislation is routinely abused and
applied to alleged financial, corporate or cyber crime. Our freedoms have been utterly
subsumed with reams of legislation justified by the War on Terror. Just as regulatory
institutions are riddled with conflicted financiers, politics is dominated by the legal fraternity
determined to legislate ad infinitum to the detriment of the law-abiding and entrepreneurial
class. Where it gets really scary is when one imagines a scenario under severe economic duress.
This is when nationalist parties come to the fore of popularity and the apparatus of the state is
hijacked and used to target whatever or whoever the common enemy happens to be.

 The economic and social implications are likely to herald a period of greater self-sufficiency and
isolation along national and lingual lines. The emphasis will be on job creation through major
infrastructure projects and a return to domestically-driven industries. The inflationary
implications of a de-globalised world are substantial from the physical aspect of scarcity and
delivery plus the financial side from money-printing to fund such projects. This is where the
Chinese and Russians have been so smart in dealing with resource-rich countries over the last
decade in return for funding infrastructure development. The western model has for many
years centered on military dominance or a debt-dumping exercise, forcing countries to export
their raw materials to pay usurious interest bills. It doesn’t take a genius to work out whom
developing countries would prefer to supply in future.

 It will be fascinating to see what imagery will be paraded by future dictators. The word for
fascism stems from a symbol of Roman power; a bundle of rods wrapped around a magistrate’s
axe designed for punishment. The illiterate Ghengis Khan was likewise famous for
demonstrating that one arrow could be snapped whereas a combination of several was
unbreakable. The message in both cases is clear; unity is strength. In an era of government spin
and media euphemism, we should be truly terrified at the prospect of despotic rule. While
there is little any one of us can do in an age where demonstration has been sanitized by
aggressive policing, we can at least take out some personal insurance. Not in the form of a
policy from your friendly broker but by way of precious metals, offering a hedge against
inflation, currency crises and catastrophe that is portable and globally acceptable.

 Guy Oppenheim is the Chairman of the Oppenheim Group with over 25 years experience as a
portfolio manager, investing globally in all asset classes. Guy Oppenheim has managed assets
well in excess of $1 billion for institutional clients, sovereign wealth funds, and private families.
Guy Oppenheim has been registered and authorized by Financial Services Authorities and
served also as Compliance and MLRO Officer.

Guy Oppenheim was educated in Geneva and holds a BA in Business Administration majoring in
Finance from the University of Geneva.

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags: Oppenheim
Stats:
views:14
posted:11/17/2012
language:
pages:3
Description: Guy Oppenheim is the owner of the world’s famous firms of the chartered accountants. This man has spent 25 years as the portfolio manager for various organizations and individuals.