RI Association of School Principals Elementary Principals Meeting

Document Sample
RI Association of School Principals Elementary Principals Meeting Powered By Docstoc
					RI Model for Educators
  Evaluation Systems
     November 2011
Why Are We Doing This?
         “Race to The Top”
The very competitive federal grant “Race to the
 Top” made unprecedented resources available
 for comprehensive educational reform plans.

 RI is one of only 11 states and the District of
   Columbia who were awarded this grant.
         RI was awarded $75 million.
   RI’s Award-Wining
Comprehensive Educational
      Reform Plan
“Transforming Education in RI”
        Five Priorities
#5 Invest Our Resources Wisely
#4 Develop User-Friendly Data Systems
#3 Establish World Class Standards &
   Assessments
#2 Accelerate All Schools Toward
   Greatness …

                 RI Strategic Plan 2010-15
        Priority #1
Ensure Educator Excellence

 “By 2012, 75% of educators will be
evaluated using rigorous performance
   evaluations that include student
         achievement data”
How Is This Being
   Designed?
       Evaluation System Goals
Provide teachers and
    administrators
1. Clear, common
   expectations for
   educator quality
2. Regular, meaningful
   feedback about
   performance and
   opportunities for
   development
Who Is Doing This
     Work?
Committee Work Structure
                                              TAC
                                       (Technical Advisory
                                           Committee)



                                      RIDE Internal Work
                                              Team
                                                                                     Educator
                                    Strategic Planning Team                         Evaluation
                                    working with consultants                          System
                                     (NCIEA, TNTP, TBA)                             Approval
                                                                                     Process

                                             ACEES
                                     (Advisory Committee on
                                      Educator Effectiveness                     District Adapters
                                            Systems)



                                     RI Educator Evaluation
                                            Model
                                            System



Impact on    Professional      Professional         Professional                      Professional
                                                                    Evaluation
 Student    Responsibilitie   Practice -Focus      Practice-Focus                     Development
                                                                     Process
 Learning         s              Teachers          Administrators                     and Support
What Is The Model?
   Student Learning Rating
        Combinations
Student Learning
     rating          Individual ratings for each
      +             of the three components will
  Professional
    Practice
                     be combined to produce a
     rating          Final Evaluation rating for
      +
 Professional
                        teachers based on the
Responsibilities      following 4-point scale:
    rating

                       1          2           3          4
      Final
   Evaluation                                          Highly
                   Ineffective Developing Effective
                                                      Effective
     rating
What Is The Process?
          Teacher Evaluation and
           Development Process
 Sept.-Oct.                  Jan.-Feb.                  May-Jun.


Beginning-of-Year              Mid-Year                End-of-Year
   Conference                 Conference               Conference

• Self-assessment         • Discuss                 • Discuss
• Set professional          professional              professional
  growth goals &            growth plan               growth plan
  create                  • Revisit student         • Deliver feedback
  professional              learning                  on performance
  growth plan               objectives                for entire year
• Set Student             • Deliver feedback        • Final evaluation
  Learning                  on performance to         rating assigned
  Objectives                date


      Ongoing feedback based on multiple classroom observations,
          data collection and targeted development activities
What Does Effective
Teaching Look Like?
Teacher Professional Practice Rubric
            alignment to
RI Professional Teaching Standards
     Professional Responsibility Rubric
aligned to RI Educator Code of Professional
               Responsibility
 “Consistent with applicable law, the RI Educator
 Code of Professional Responsibility shall serve as a
     basis for decisions on issues pertaining to
     certification, licensure and employment.”
1. Responsibility to Students
2. Responsibility to Self
3. Responsibility to Colleagues
4. Responsibility to Parents & Community
5. Responsibility to RI Board of Regents
                 Rhode Island Department Of Education
                                                2009
Professional Growth Plans
             Teachers:
                Complete a Self-Assessment
                 by reviewing the 2 rubrics
                Create 3 specific,
                 measureable, professional
                 goals
                Write their Professional
                 Growth Plan for the year.
                Link their plan to support &
                 development opportunities
                 targeted to their professional
                 needs.
 How Will We Know If
Students Are Learning?
    Student Learning Objectives
Aug      Sep    Oct    Nov   Dec   Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr    May    Jun



      Goal Setting                 Check In          Goal Attainment
     Teacher sets at        Student progress to    Evidence of
      least two Student
      Learning               date assessed using     student learning
      Objectives             all pieces of           reviewed
     Objectives based       evidence available.     Evaluator makes
      on students’           Student Learning       final determination
      starting points and    Objectives and/or       of the degree to
      pre-determined
      priority               assessment methods      which each
      standards/skills       adjusted based on       objective has been
     Assessment             additional student      met based on
      methods to             information             judgment of the
      measure student                                assessment
      progress selected
                                                     outcomes
   Overarching Student Learning
           Framework
The student learning rating is determined by a combination of
      different sources of evidence of student learning.
           These sources fall into three categories:
 Category 1:             Category 2:       Category 3:
Student growth         Student growth       Other local
    on state           on standardized        school,
 standardized            district tests    administrator,
     tests                 DIBELS           or teacher-
                            NWEA             selected
   NECAP                 AP Exams,         measures of
   PARCC                 Stanford-10          student
                          ACCESS           performance



Measured using                 Used with a goal
a growth model                attainment process
When Will This Be
 Implemented?
    Tiered System Roll Out Plan
                                  SY 2011-12   SY 2012-13   SY 2013-14

Teacher Evaluation Process             X

Teacher Evaluation System
                                                    X
(with rewards/consequences)

Building Administrator
                                       X
Evaluation Process

Building Administrator
Evaluation System                                   X
(with rewards/consequences)

Support Staff and District
                                                                 X
Administrator Evaluation System
Questions & Answers

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:5
posted:11/14/2012
language:English
pages:24