DoDAF DM2 WG Welcome 2011 05 04

Document Sample
DoDAF DM2 WG Welcome 2011 05 04 Powered By Docstoc
					DoDAF-DM2 WG
Orientation Brief

       13 April 2011
  DoDAF Development Team
                   Agenda
•   DoDAF-DM2 WG history
•   DoDAF-DM2 WG Objectives
•   Current DoDAF-DM2 WG Participants
•   DoDAF-DM2 WG Challenges
•   DoDAF-DM2 WG Way Ahead




                                        2
                                    Lay of DoDAF Land
                    1. Model (view) specifications
                           •   Operational
                           •   Capabilities                                   OPS        JCIDS     DAS        SE          CPM                   PPBE
                                                                                                                                                        Process
                                                                                                                                                        Supported
 The 52 DoDAF
                           •   Services
models and the
DM2 are related            •   Systems                                        FFP                        Legacy                                         Views




                                                                                                                                 Te
                                                                                                                           ms
                           •




                                                                                                                                    chn
                                                                                                                            te
                               Data and Information




                                                                                                                        Sys



                                                                                                                                       ic
                                                                                                                                       ica
   via a matrix*




                                                                                                                                       l
                                                                                                                           Operational



                           •   Standards
                           •   Projects                                       Capabilities
                                                                                                       Resource
                                                                                                        Flows           Projects
                    2. DM2                                                                Performers
                                                                                                                                                        Data
                           – Conceptual Data Model – very simple                 Rules
                                                                                                 Services          Reification

                           – Logical Data Model                                              Locations                                       Pedigree

                               • Because of IDEAS there are only ~250
                                 total data elements compared to the less-
                                 expressive CADM that had ~16,000!            Temporal Parts,
                                                                             Boundaries, Before-
                                                                                                   Sum, Fusion, Union,
                                                                                                      Intersection,
                                                                                                                                  Naming &
                                                                                                                                 Description

                           – Physical Exchange Specification is
                                                                                   After           Partition, & Disjoint
                                                                                                                                                        Ontology
                                                                                              Type instances,
                                                                              Parts and                                Properties &
                               • Automatically generated from the LDM (an     overlaps
                                                                                             super-subtypes, &
                                                                                                powertypes
                                                                                                                        Measures

                                 IDEAS plug-in, already paid-for)                4-D Mereotopology                   Set Theory

                               • Slightly-dumbed-down LDM in XML so if
 * 52 DoDAF models X             you know the LDM, PES is simple
 250 DM2 data                  • PES tags and definitions are identical to
 elements, referred to
 as the “monster
                                 DM2 LDM
 matrix” because it has        • No new structures are introduced other
 ~ 13,000 decision cells         than XML-isms
                                                                                                                                                        3
                                                                  Views
                                    DoDAF 1.5                                                                          DoDAF 2.02
          Models                                    Descriptions                              Models                                  Descriptions
                                                                                                                Describes a Project's Visions, Goals, Objectives,
AV-1 : Overview and            Scope, purpose, intended users, environment            AV-1: Overview and
                                                                                                                Plans, Activities, Events, Conditions, Measures,
Summary Information            depicted, analytical findings                          Summary Information
                                                                                                                Effects (Outcomes), and produced objects.
                                                                                                                An architectural data repository with definitions of all
                               Architecture data repository with definitions of all   AV-2: Integrated
AV-2 : Integrated Dictionary                                                                                    terms used throughout the architectural data and
                               terms used in all products                             Dictionary
                                                                                                                presentations.
                                                                                                                The overall vision for transformational endeavors,
                                                                                      CV-1: Vision              which provides a strategic context for the capabilities
                                                                                                                described and a high-level scope.
                                                                                                                A hierarchy of capabilities which specifies all the
                                                                                      CV-2: Capability
                                                                                                                capabilities that are referenced throughout one or
                                                                                      Taxonomy
                                                                                                                more Architectural Descriptions.
                                                                                                                The planned achievement of capability at different
                                                                                                                points in time or during specific periods of time. The
                                                                                                                CV-3 shows the capability phasing in terms of the
                                                                                      CV-3: Capability
                                                                                                                activities, conditions, desired effects, rules complied
                                                                                      Phasing
                                                                                                                with, resource consumption and production, and
                                                                                                                measures, without regard to the performer and
                                                                                                                location solutions.
                                                                                      CV-4: Capability          The dependencies between planned capabilities and
                                                                                      Dependencies              the definition of logical groupings of capabilities.
                                                                                                                The fulfillment of capability requirements shows the
                                                                                                                planned capability deployment and interconnection
                                                                                      CV-5: Capability to
                                                                                                                for a particular Capability Phase. The CV-5 shows
                                                                                      Organizational
                                                                                                                the planned solution for the phase in terms of
                                                                                      Development Mapping
                                                                                                                performers and locations and their associated
                                                                                                                concepts.
                                                                                      CV-6: Capability to
                                                                                                                A mapping between the capabilities required and the
                                                                                      Operational Activities
                                                                                                                operational activities that those capabilities support.
                                                                                      Mapping
                                                                                      CV-7: Capability to       A mapping between the capabilities and the services
                                                                                      Services Mapping          that these capabilities enable.
                                                                                      DIV-1:Conceptual Data     The required high-level data concepts and their
                                                                                      Model                     relationships.
                                                                                                                It describes the dependency relationships between
                                                                                      PV-1: Project Portfolio
                                                                                                                the organizations and projects and the organizational
                                                                                      Relationships
                                                                                                                structures needed to manage a portfolio of projects.
                                                                                                                A timeline perspective on programs or projects, with
                                                                                      PV-2: Project Timelines
                                                                                                                the key milestones and interdependencies.
                                                                                                                A mapping of programs and projects to capabilities to
                                                                                      PV-3: Project to
                                                                                                                show how the specific projects and program
                                                                                      Capability Mapping
                                                                                                                elements help to achieve a capability.
                                                                                                                                                                           4
                                                                 Views

                                  DoDAF 1.5                                                                    DoDAF 2.02
          Models                               Descriptions                              Models                              Descriptions
TV-1: Technical Standards  Listing of standards that apply to Systems and        StdV-1 Standards       The listing of standards that apply to solution
Profile                    Services View elements in a given architecture        Profile                elements.
                           Description of emerging standards and potential                              The description of emerging standards and potential
TV-2 : Technical Standards                                                       StdV-2 Standards
                           impact on current Systems and Services View                                  impact on current solution elements, within a set of
Forecast                                                                         Forecast
                           elements, within a set of time frames                                        time frames.
                           Documentation of the system data requirements and                            The documentation of the data requirements and
                                                                                 DIV-2: Logical Data
OV-7 : Logical Data Model structural business process rules of the Operational                          structural business process (activity) rules. In DoDAF
                                                                                 Model
                           View                                                                         V1.5, this was the OV-7.
                                                                                                        The physical implementation format of the Logical
                             Physical implementation of the Logical Data Model
                                                                                 DIV-3: Physical Data   Data Model entities, e.g., message formats, file
SV-11: Physical Schema       entities, e.g., message formats, file structures,
                                                                                 Model                  structures, physical schema. In DoDAF V1.5, this
                             physical schema
                                                                                                        was the SV-11.




                                                                                                                                                       5
                                                                  Views
                                   DoDAF 1.5                                                                           DoDAF 2.02
          Models                                  Descriptions                                Models                                 Descriptions
OV-1 : High-Level                                                                     OV-1: High-Level
                              High-level graphical/textual description of operational                           The high-level graphical/textual description of the
Operational Concept                                                                   Operational Concept
                              concept                                                                           operational concept.
Graphic                                                                               Graphic
                                                                                      OV-2: Operational
OV-2 : Operational Node       Operational nodes, connectivity, and information                                  A description of the Resource Flows exchanged
                                                                                      Resource Flow
Connectivity Description      exchange need lines between nodes                                                 between operational activities.
                                                                                      Description
OV-3 : Operational
                              Information exchanged between nodes and the            OV-3: Operational          A description of the resources exchanged and the
Information Exchange
                              relevant attributes of that exchange                   Resource Flow Matrix       relevant attributes of the exchanges.
Matrix
OV-4 : Organizational         Organizational, role, or other relationships among     OV-4: Organizational       The organizational context, role or other relationships
Relationships Chart           organizations                                          Relationships Chart        among organizations.
                                                                                     OV-5a: Operational
                                                                                                                The capabilities and activities (operational activities)
                                                                                     Activity Decomposition
                                                                                                                organized in a hierarchal structure.
                              Capabilities, operational activities, relationships    Tree
OV-5 : Operational Activity   among activities, inputs, and outputs; overlays can
                                                                                                                The context of capabilities and activities (operational
Model                         show cost, performing nodes, or other pertinent
                                                                                     OV-5b: Operational         activities) and their relationships among activities,
                              information
                                                                                     Activity Model             inputs, and outputs; Additional data can show cost,
                                                                                                                performers, or other pertinent information.
                              One of three products used to describe operational                             One of three models used to describe activity
OV-6a : Operational Rules                                                            OV-6a: Operational
                              activity-identifies business rules that constrain                              (operational activity). It identifies business rules that
Model                                                                                Rules Model
                              operation                                                                      constrain operations.
                                                                                                             One of three models used to describe operational
                              One of three products used to describe operational
OV-6b : Operational State                                                            OV-6b: State Transition activity (activity). It identifies business process
                              activity-identifies business process responses to
Transition Description                                                               Description             (activity) responses to events (usually, very short
                              events
                                                                                                             activities).
                              One of three products used to describe operational                             One of three models used to describe activity
OV-6c : Operational Event-                                                           OV-6c: Event-Trace
                              activity-traces actions in a scenario or sequence of                           (operational activity). It traces actions in a scenario or
Trace Description                                                                    Description
                              events                                                                         sequence of events.




                                                                                                                                                                  6
                                                                 Views
                                    DoDAF 1.5                                                                    DoDAF 2.02
           Models                                 Descriptions                            Models                               Descriptions
                                                                                  SvcV-1 Services         The identification of services, service items, and their
                                                                                  Context Description     interconnections.
                                                                                  SvcV-2 Services
                                                                                                          A description of Resource Flows exchanged between
                                                                                  Resource Flow
                                                                                                          services.
                                                                                  Description
                                                                                  SvcV-3a Systems-        The relationships among or between systems and
                                                                                  Services Matrix         services in a given Architectural Description.
                                                                                                          The relationships among services in a given
                                                                                  SvcV-3b Services-       Architectural Description. It can be designed to show
                                                                                  Services Matrix         relationships of interest, (e.g., service-type
                                                                                                          interfaces, planned vs. existing interfaces).
                                                                                  SvcV-4 Services
SV-4b : Services              Functions performed by services and the service                             The functions performed by services and the service
                                                                                  Functionality
Functionality Description     data flow among service functions                                           data flows among service functions (activities).
                                                                                  Description
SV-5c : Operational Activity                                                      SvcV-5 Operational
                                                                                                          A mapping of services (activities) back to operational
to Services Traceability     Mapping of services back to operational activities   Activity to Services
                                                                                                          activities (activities).
Matrix                                                                            Traceability Matrix
                                                                                                          It provides details of service Resource Flow elements
                                                                                  SvcV-6 Services
                                                                                                          being exchanged between services and the attributes
                                                                                  Resource Flow Matrix
                                                                                                          of that exchange.
                                                                                  SvcV-7 Services         The measures (metrics) of Services Model elements
                                                                                  Measures Matrix         for the appropriate time frame(s).
                                                                                                          The planned incremental steps toward migrating a
                                                                                  SvcV-8 Services
                                                                                                          suite of services to a more efficient suite or toward
                                                                                  Evolution Description
                                                                                                          evolving current services to a future implementation.
                                                                                                          The emerging technologies, software/hardware
                                                                                  SvcV-9 Services
                                                                                                          products, and skills that are expected to be available
                                                                                  Technology & Skills
                                                                                                          in a given set of time frames and that will affect
                                                                                  Forecast
                                                                                                          future service development.
                                                                                                          One of three models used to describe service
                                                                                  SvcV-10a Services       functionality. It identifies constraints that are imposed
                                                                                  Rules Model             on systems functionality due to some aspect of
                                                                                                          system design or implementation.
                                                                                  SvcV-10b Services       One of three models used to describe service
                                                                                  State Transition        functionality. It identifies responses of services to
                                                                                  Description             events.
                                                                                                          One of three models used to describe service
                                                                                  SvcV-10c Services
                                                                                                          functionality. It identifies service-specific refinements
                                                                                  Event-Trace
                                                                                                          of critical sequences of events described in the
                                                                                  Description
                                                                                                          Operational Viewpoint.                                      7
                                                             Views
                                   DoDAF 1.5                                                                          DoDAF 2.02
           Models                                 Descriptions                                Models                                Descriptions
SV-1 : Systems Interface
                              Identification of systems nodes, systems, system
Description                                                                           SV-1 Systems Interface The identification of systems, system items, and their
                              items, services, and service items and their
Services Interface                                                                    Description            interconnections.
                              interconnections, within and between nodes
Description
SV-2 : Systems
Communications                Systems nodes, systems, system items, services,
                                                                                      SV-2 Systems Resource A description of Resource Flows exchanged between
Description                   and service items and their related communications
                                                                                      Flow Description      systems.
Services Communications       lay-downs
Description
SV-3 : Systems-Systems       Relationships among systems and services in a                                     The relationships among systems in a given
Matrix                       given architecture; can be designed to show              SV-3 Systems-Systems     Architectural Description. It can be designed to show
Services-Systems Matrix      relationships of interest, e.g., system-type interfaces, Matrix                   relationships of interest, (e.g., system-type
Services-Services Matrix     planned vs. existing interfaces, etc.                                             interfaces, planned vs. existing interfaces).
                                                                                      SV-4 Systems             The functions (activities) performed by systems and
SV-4a : Systems              Functions performed by systems and the system
                                                                                      Functionality            the system data flows among system functions
Functionality Description    data flows among system functions
                                                                                      Description              (activities).
                                                                                      SV-5a Operational
SV-5a : Operational Activity
                             Mapping of system functions back to operational          Activity to Systems      A mapping of system functions (activities) back to
to Systems Function
                             activities                                               Function Traceability    operational activities (activities).
Traceability Matrix
                                                                                      Matrix
SV-5b : Operational Activity                                                          SV-5b Operational
                             Mapping of systems back to capabilities or                                        A mapping of systems back to capabilities or
to Systems Traceability                                                               Activity to Systems
                             operational activities                                                            operational activities (activities).
Matrix                                                                                Traceability Matrix
SV-6 : Systems Data
                             Provides details of system or service data elements                               Provides details of system resource flow elements
Exchange Matrix                                                                       SV-6 Systems Resource
                             being exchanged between systems or services and                                   being exchanged between systems and the attributes
Services Data Exchange                                                                Flow Matrix
                             the attributes of that exchange                                                   of that exchange.
Matrix
SV-7 : Systems
Performance Parameters       Performance characteristics of Systems and
                                                                                      SV-7 Systems             The measures (metrics) of Systems Model elements
Matrix                       Services View elements for the appropriate time
                                                                                      Measures Matrix          for the appropriate timeframe(s).
Services Performance         frame(s)
Parameters Matrix
SV-8 : Systems Evolution     Planned incremental steps toward migrating a suite
                                                                                                               The planned incremental steps toward migrating a
Description                  of systems or services to a more efficient suite, or     SV-8 Systems
                                                                                                               suite of systems to a more efficient suite, or toward
Services Evolution           toward evolving a current system to a future             Evolution Description
                                                                                                               evolving a current system to a future implementation.
Description                  implementation
SV-9 : Systems Technology Emerging technologies and software/hardware                                          The emerging technologies, software/hardware
                                                                                      SV-9 Systems
Forecast                     products that are expected to be available in a given                             products, and skills that are expected to be available
                                                                                      Technology & Skills
Services Technology          set of time frames and that will affect future                                    in a given set of time frames and that will affect
                                                                                      Forecast
Forecast                     development of the architecture                                                   future system development.
                              One of three products used to describe system and                                One of three models used to describe system
SV-10a : Systems Rules
                              service functionality-identifies constraints that are   SV-10a Systems Rules     functionality. It identifies constraints that are imposed
Model
                              imposed on systems/services functionality due to        Model                    on systems functionality due to some aspect of
Services Rules Model
                              some aspect of systems design or implementation                                  system design or implementation.
SV-10b : Systems State
                              One of three products used to describe system and                                One of three models used to describe system
Transition Description                                                                SV-10b Systems State
                              service functionality-identifies responses of a                                  functionality. It identifies responses of systems to
Services State Transition                                                             Transition Description
                              system/service to events                                                         events.
Description
SV-10c : Systems Event-       One of three products used to describe system or                                 One of three models used to describe system
Trace Description             service functionality-identifies system/service-specific SV-10c Systems Event-   functionality. It identifies system-specific refinements
Services Event-Trace          refinements of critical sequences of events described Trace Description          of critical sequences of events described in the
Description                   in the Operational View                                                          Operational Viewpoint.                                      8
                        Conceptual Level of DM2
                               is Simple
                                               Condition


          Guidance                                    is-performable-under

             Rule
                                 constrains                                          requires-
      Standard   Agreement
                                                                                     ability-to-
                                                          Activity                    perform
                                                                                                           Capability
                                                                                                                                                                 Backup
                                                                                                                                                                 slide has
                                              has                            consumes-
                                                                   is-                             is-realized-                                                     term
                                                                                and-                    by        achieves-desired-
                             Project                           performed-
                                                                              produces
                                                                                                                                                                definitions
                                               is-the-             by                                             effect (a state of a
                                               goal-of                                                                resource)

                                                                                                                                describes-
                                                                             Resource                                           something
Not shown but implied by the                                                                           Information
  IDEAS Foundation:
                                                    Materiel                                                 Data
• Everything is 4-D and so has
  temporal parts, i.e., states
                                                                            Performer
• Everything has parts                                                 System     Organization                                           is-at
                                                                                                                                                 Location
• Everything has subtypes
                                                                                                                                                 GeoPolitical
                                                                       Service    PersonRole



                                 is-part-of

                                                         anything can have Measures
                                                                                                                                                                         9
                  DoDAF 2 Conceptual Data
                       Model Terms
•   Activity: Work, not specific to a single organization, weapon system or individual that transforms inputs (Resources) into outputs
    (Resources) or changes their state.
•   Resource: Data, Information, Performers, Materiel, or Personnel Types that are produced or consumed.
      –    Materiel: Equipment, apparatus or supplies that are of interest, without distinction as to its application for administrative or combat purposes.
      –    Information: The state of a something of interest that is materialized -- in any medium or form -- and communicated or received.
              •    Data: Representation of information in a formalized manner suitable for communication, interpretation, or processing by humans or by automatic means.
                   Examples could be whole models, packages, entities, attributes, classes, domain values, enumeration values, records, tables, rows, columns, and fields.
      –    Performer: Any entity - human, automated, or any aggregation of human and/or automated - that performs an activity and provides a capability.
              •    Organization: A specific real-world assemblage of people and other resources organized for an on-going purpose.
              •    System: A functionally, physically, and/or behaviorally related group of regularly interacting or interdependent elements.
              •    Person Role: A category of persons defined by the role or roles they share that are relevant to an architecture.
              •    Service: A mechanism to enable access to a set of one or more capabilities, where the access is provided using a prescribed interface and is exercised
                   consistent with constraints and policies as specified by the service description. The mechanism is a Performer. The capabilities accessed are Resources
                   -- Information, Data, Materiel, Performers, and Geo-political Extents.
•   Capability: The ability to achieve a Desired Effect under specified (performance) standards and conditions through combinations of ways
    and means (activities and resources) to perform a set of activities.
•   Condition: The state of an environment or situation in which a Performer performs.
•   Desired Effect: A desired state of a Resource.
•   Measure: The magnitude of some attribute of an individual.
•   Location: A point or extent in space that may be referred to physically or logically.
•   Guidance: An authoritative statement intended to lead or steer the execution of actions.
      –    Rule: A principle or condition that governs behavior; a prescribed guide for conduct or action.
              •    Agreement: A consent among parties regarding the terms and conditions of activities that said parties participate in.
              •    Standard: A formal agreement documenting generally accepted specifications or criteria for products, processes, procedures, policies, systems, and/or
                   personnel.
•   Project: A temporary endeavor undertaken to create Resources or Desired Effects.
•   Geopolitical Extent      A geospatial extent whose boundaries are by declaration or agreement by political parties.




                                                                                                                                                                      10
                               PES Structure
                Planned for future interoperability
                          with IDEAS
                                                                Packaging, e.g., overall
                                                                classification marking
                                                                         Extra goodies for
Screen-                                                                  Dublin Core (optional)
scrape of the
actual PES
XSD


                                                            Architecture data – tag
                                                            names and definitions are
                                                            exactly from DM2 LDM


                                              •        Where you say what views the data
                                                       corresponds to
                                                        –   One PES file can have multiple views
                                                        –   A single piece of data can be in multiple
                                                            views
                 XML stuff -- unimportant               –   A recipient of the XML file should validated it
                                                            against PES XSD which automatically
                                                            encodes the “monster matrix”.
                                            This
                                            could be
                                            made
                                            optional


                                                                                                        11
          DoDAF-DM2 WG history
•   DoDAF 2.0 development in 2008-2009 was done via 3
    technical working groups:
    1. Presentation
    2. Methods
    3. Data
•   Data TWG methodology during DoDAF 2.0
    development
    –   Top-down from DoD’s six core processes and their information
        requirements collected as part of the requirements workshops
    –   Bottoms-up from ~ two dozen existing data models
    –   Business rules enabled great success – DM2 has only ~ 250
        pieces compared to predecessor CADM’s ~ 16,000
•   DoDAF 2.0 publication in May 2009
    –   Only Data TWG established a significant membership and
        meeting tempo and so it was a resource of opportunity to
        assume DoDAF configuration management recommendations
                                                                   12
Top-Down / Bottom-Up
    Development
DoD Core Process Information Requirements Collection

                  JCIDS Process     PPBE Process
                   Information        Information
                  Requirements      Requirements
            Ops Planning
               Process             DAS Process
             Information            Information
            Requirements           Requirements
                                     CPM Process
         SE Process                    Information
         Information                 Requirements
        Requirements
                                                          DoDAF 2.0:
                                                        Conceptual Data
UCORE                                                    Model (Vol I)

               Coordination
                  COI
                               Data Model               Logical Data
 COI1                         Development                Model (Vol II)
                                                        Physical
 COIn                                                    Exchange Model
                                                         (Vol III)
Existing / Emerging Schema, Models, and Databases




                                                                           13
            Conceptual Data Model Process
                                                                                                       3. Make a pass on the
1. Overviews of Models                   2. Collect the terms                                          “Core” Terms
                                                                                                             1 = Core, critical to process or
                                                                                                             very common in architectures
                                                                                                             2 = Derived or less common
                                                                                                             3 = TBD
                                                                                                             4 = TBD
                                                                                                             5 = TBD       5
                                                                                                                                 4
                                                                                                                                 3
                                                                                                                                 2

                                                                                                                                1



         5. Group                                                              4. Gather authoritative
         related terms                                                         definitions for “Core” terms

                                                               7. Relationships
                         6. Proposed                                                                8. Relationship Types
                         definitions                                                                                  Ontology
                                                                                                                     Relationship
                         (+rationale,                                                                                   Types



                         examples,                                                               Meronymic     Influence             Dependency   Classification


                         and aliases)                                                                            Case                Temporal

                                                                                                                           Spatial




          12/3                        1/3                          2/3                       3/3
          Strawman – list of          Partial Draft –              Interim Draft – Initial   CDM version 0.1
          important or recurring      proposed definitions, some   relationships (e.g.,      1. Concepts (defined)
          “core”                      harmonization (e.g., via     "performs", "part-of",    2. Relationships (some
          words/terms/concepts        super/subtyping,             ...)                         typing, e.g., super/sub,
          with source definition(s)   determining aliases)                                      cardinality)                                                       14
                               Sources
               Models                             Definitions
a.   CADM 1.5                         1.  IEEE
b.   IDEAS                            2.  ISO
c.   UPDM                             3.  W3C
d.   BMM                              4.  OMG
e.   Hay/Zachman                      5.  EIA
f.   ASM                              6.  DODD & DODI
g.   CRIS                             7.  JCS Pubs, especially CJCSI's
h.   Conceptual CADM in DoDAF 1.0 /   8.  Models in the
     prototype CADM 2.0                   Source_Candidates_071115.ppt
i.   M3                               9. DoDAF
j.   NAF Meta Model                   10. Other frameworks: Zachman,
k.   DoI Meta Model                       MODAF, TOGAF, NAF, ...
l.   JC3IEDM                          11. FEA
m.   GML                              12. BMM
n.   UCORE 1.1                        13. Worknet
o.   GEIA 927                         14. Wikipedia
p.   AP233                            15. English dictionaries
q.   SUMO and ISO 15926 (via          16. DoDAF Glossary
     IDEAS)
r.   FEA Reference Models
s.   JFCOM JACAE
                                                                         15
                      Definition Phase Example 1
      Category     Capability

Technical Term     Capability

     Proposed      Capability: (n) 1. The ability to execute a specified course of action. (JP 1-02) 2. The ability to achieve a desired effect under
     Definition    specified standards and conditions through combinations of means and ways to perform a set of tasks. (JCIDS)

    Potentially
      Related
     Terms or
       Aliases
Source/Current     (JCIDS): The ability to achieve a desired effect under specified standards and conditions through combinations of means and
     Definition    ways to perform a set of tasks.
       (source)    (DoDAF/CADM): An ability to achieve an objective. (DDDS Counter (333/1)(A))
      definition   (JC3IEDM): The potential ability to do work, perform a function or mission, achieve an objective, or provide a service.
                   (NAF): The ability of one or more resources to deliver a specified type of effect or a specified course of action. (GEN TERM)
                   (NAF): A high level specification of the enterprise's ability. (MM)
                   (JCS 1-02): The ability to execute a specified course of action. (A capability may or may not be accompanied by an intention.)
                   (Webster's): 1. The quality of being capable; ability. 2. A talent or ability that has potential for development or use. 3. The
                   capacity to be used, treated, or developed for a specific purpose.

     Examples      "The soldier shall be able to load and fire his individual weapon." (JP 1-02) "The soldier shall be able to load and fire his individual
                   weapon from (positions) on a trainfire range, in (weather) to achieve a minimum score of "Marksman" on the Army Marksm

     Definition    Authority: "The Secretary of Defense, by DOD Directive 5025.12, 23 August 1989, Standardization of Military and Associated
     Rationale     Terminology, has directed the use of JP 1-02 throughout the Department of Defense to ensure standardization of military and
                   associated terminology.




                                                                                                                                                    16
                            WG Business Rules
                       Essential for Broad Community
Rule #     Rule Name
                                 Consensus                                             Description
  1    Terms and         All model and alias terms proposed for inclusion in the data dictionary shall be researched for multiple source definitions.
       Definitions       DoD definitions shall be included. Other Federal Government, industry and academic and common definitions should also
                         be included. The WG shall formulate a baseline definition based on the multiple sources, core process requirements, and
                         model structural meaning. The source definitions and the rationale for the baseline definition shall be maintained in the data
                         dictionary as well.
  2   Aliases            Terms representing concepts that are represented in a semantically equivalent way by other terms and concepts in the
                         model shall be maintained as aliases and shall not be introduced into the model. Multiple source definitions shall be
                         maintained as with other model terms and a consensus definition shall be derived from the sources.
  3   Core Process       All concepts included in the DM2 shall be necessary to support the information requirements of one or more core processes
      Requirement        (PPBE, DAS, JCIDS, CPM, SE, OPS). All DoDAF models shall be applicable to one or more core processes. Core process
                         information requirements shall be as explicitly or implicitly specified in current or planned DoD governance. All model terms
                         and concepts not necessary for core process support with architectures shall be removed. All core process information
                         requirements for architectural descriptions shall be modeled and contained in one or more DoDAF models.
  4   Aggregation Rule   If a term representing a concept differs structurally from some other term representing some concept only in level of
                         aggregation, it shall not be included in the model. Whole-part relationships cover the need without different names for
                         different types of wholes and parts. The term may be included as an alias.
  5   Subtype Rule       If a term representing a subtype concept has no structural difference from its supertype, it shall not be included in the model.
                         Super-subtype relationships cover the need without different names for different types of supertypes and subtypes. The term
                         may be included as an alias.
  6   Typed              All relationships shall be typed, ultimately up to IDEAS foundation. The typing shall be determined using BORO analysis of
      Relationships      spatio-temporal examples.
  7   Attributes and     All attribute and property relationships shall be explicit, that is, by an association class that is typed according to the Typed
      Properties         Relationships rule. The only exceptions are for representational exemplars.
  8   DoDAF model        All DoDAF models shall be specified using terms from the data dictionary. Aliases may be used. If new terms are required,
      specification      they shall undergo the process for new term inclusion in the data dictionary as described by the Terms and Definitions and
                         Aliases rules. All DoDAF models shall be mapped to the DM2 classes (base and associative) that represent the information
                         contained in the view the model specifies.
  9   Logical            The DM2 LDM shall pass all logical consistency tests enforced by the Proctor, an IDEAS consistency tool.
      Correctness
 10   Information        There shall be a provision to provide pedigree (and provenance) for every piece of data IAW NCDS
      Pedigree
      Security           There shall be a provision to provide a classification marking for every piece of data and for DM2 PES XML documents
      classification     overall IAW NCDS
      marking
 11   XSD                The PES XSD shall adhere to XML standards and best practices.
                                                                                                                                                    17
                                                 DoDAF Must Relate to Core
                                                       Processes
                                                                                                                                                                                                     DRAFT




                                                                                                                                                                                                     Organizational Structure
                                                                                                                                                         Information And Data

                                                                                                                                                                                Reification Levels
                                                                                                                                         Resource Flow




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Capability
                                                                                                                             Performer
DoD Core




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  Pedigree




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               Location
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Services




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Measure
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Project



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Rules
Process/                                                                        Primary Directive, Instruction, or
                                           Core Process Primary Products
  Sub-                                                                                Decision Authority
Process



                                                                              DoD 5000.2-R
                                                                              DoDD 5000.4
                                      Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)
                                                                              Mil-HDBK-881A
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
  Defense Acquisition System (DAS)
  Essential Acquisition Instruments




                                                                              Integrated Master Plan and Integrated Master
                                                                              Schedule Preparation and Use Guide, Version
                                      Integrated Master Plan and Schedule
                                      (IMP/IMS)
                                                                              0.9 October 21, 2005                                                                                                                                                                     

                                                                              DoD 5000.2-R
                                                                              DoDD 5000.4
                                                                              Defense Acquisition Guidebook (DAG), Section
                                      Risk Management Plan (RMP)              11.4)                                                                                                                                                                                     
                                                                              RISK MANAGEMENT GUIDE FOR DOD
                                                                              ACQUISITION, Version 0.9
                                                                              October 21, 2005
                                                                              DoDI 5000.02 Enclosure 2
                                      Technology Development Strategy (TDS)   Defense Acquisition Guide, Section 2.2                                                                                                                                                           
                                      Milestone and Gate Reviews                                                                                                                                                                                                        
                                                                              OMB Circular No. A-11
                                      Acquisition Strategy (AS)               Chapter 2 Defense Acquisition Guidebook                                                                                                                                                            



DRAFT
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      18
                                DoDAF Must Relate to Core
                                      Processes
                                                                                                                                                                     DRAFT




                                                                                                                                                                                          Organizational Structure
                                                                                                                                              Information And Data

                                                                                                                                                                     Reification Levels
                                                                                                                              Resource Flow




                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Capability
                                                                                                                  Performer
DoD Core




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Pedigree




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Location
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  Services




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Measure
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Project



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  Rules
Process/                                                              Primary Directive, Instruction, or
                             Core Process Primary Products
  Sub-                                                                      Decision Authority
Process



                                                                    Systems Engineering Plan Preparation Guide,
                        System Engineering Plan (SEP)               Version 2.01, April 2008                                 
                                                                    DoD 5000.2,
                        Specification Development Plan (SDP)        DoD Acquisiton Guide Book, Chapter 4                   
                                                                    DoD 5000.2, DoD Acquisiton Guide Book,
                        System Segment or SoS Specifications        Chapter 4                                                
                                                                    DoD 5000.2
                        Interface Requirement Document (IRD)--      DoD Acquisiton Guide Book, Chapter 4
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
  Systems Engineering




                        May be part of SoS Specification
                                                                    DoD 5000.2
      -Acquisition-




                        Statement of Work/Performance (SOW/P)       DoD Acquisiton Guide Book, Chapter 4                                                                    
                                                                    DoD 5000.2
                        Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP)      DoD Acquisiton Guide Book, Chapter 4,7,9                 
                        Interoperability Test Proeedures (Tied to   DoDD 4630.05, May 5, 2004
                                                                    CJCSI 6212.01E/F
                        ISP and NR-KPP)-JITC Joint                  DoD Acquisiton Guide Book, Chapter 4,7                                                                                    
                        Interoperability Certification
                                                                    DoD 5000.2
                                                                    DoD Acquisiton Guide Book, Chapter 4,7,9
                                                                    Measures Development Standard Operating
                        Operational Test Procedures (Mission        Procedure (SOP) ,September 15, 2010,
                        Thread Oriented)                            Director, Operational Test and Evaluation                                                                                 
                                                                    (DOT&E) sponsored Joint Test and Evaluation
                                                                    Methodology - Transition (JTEM-T)



DRAFT
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    19
                                                                           DoDAF Must Relate to Core
                                                                                 Processes
                                                                                                                                                                                                                DRAFT




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Organizational Structure
                                                                                                                                                                                         Information And Data




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Information Pedigree
                                                                                                                                                                                                                Reification Levels
                                                                                                                                                                         Resource Flow




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Capability
                                                                                                                                                             Performer




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  Pedigree




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               Location
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Services




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Measure
 DoD Core




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Project



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Rules
                                                                                                              Primary Directive, Instruction, or
 Process/                                                              Core Process Primary Products
                                                                                                                    Decision Authority
Sub-Process




                                                                                                            OSD (PA&E)
Planning, Programming, Budgeting and




                                                                  Joint Programming Guidance (JPG)          DoD Directive 7045.14, The Planning,
                                                                  Strategic Planning Guidance (SPG)         Programming, Budgeting, and Execution
                                       Planning and Programming




                                                                  OMB Fiscal guidance                       System
                                                                                                            (PPBE), (PBBE) Integrated PBBE Guide, DSN
                                                                  National Strategy for Homeland Security                                                                                                                                                                                              
           Execution (PPBE)




                                                                                                            785-0071, 23 May 1997
                                                                  (NSHS)
                                                                  Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR)          Other--E-GOV, President’s Management
                                                                                                            Agenda; High interest projects with Congress,
                                                                                                            GAO, OMB, or the general public; Cross-cutting
                                                                                                            initiative, e.g., Homeland Security.

                                                                  Program Objective Memo (POM)              Service/Agency Submissions
                                                                  Budget Estimate Submission (BES)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                            Joint Staff Review:
                                                                  Chairman's Program Assessment (CPA)       CJCSI 8501_01 JOINT STAFF                                                                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                            PARTICIPATION IN THE PPBE
                                                                  POM Issue Papers and Reclama's            Services, Joint Staff, and OSD directorates                                                                                                                                                
                                                                  Program Decision Memoranda (PDMs)         DEPSECDEF
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       


        DRAFT
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     20
                                                                                       DoDAF Must Relate to Core
                                                                                             Processes




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Organizational Structure
                                                                                                                                                                                                           Information And Data

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  Reification Levels
                                                                                                                                                                                           Resource Flow




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  Capability
                                                                                                                                                                               Performer




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Pedigree




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Location
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               Services




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Measure
 DoD Core




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Project



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               Rules
                                                                                                                                 Primary Directive, Instruction, or
 Process/                                                                               Core Process Primary Products
                                                                                                                                       Decision Authority
Sub-Process




                                                                                   BES Review:                                 USD(C) office and OMB
                                                                                   Program Budget Decisions (PBDs)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                               USD (Acquisition, Technology & Logistics) and
                                                                                                                               D, PA&EUSD (Acquisition, Technology &
                                                                                   Major Budget Issues (MBIs)                  Logistics) and D, PA&E, Services, PEOs, PMs                                                                                                                                               
 Planning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution (PPBE)




                                                                                                                               FYDP Program Structure Handbook (DoD
                                                                                                                               7045.7-H)
                                                                                                                               Summarizes forces, resources, and equipment

                                                                                                  DRAFT                        associated with all DoD programs approved by
                                                                                                                               the SECDEF:
                                                                                                                                 Budget Exhibits-
                                                                                                                                  -Major Force Program (MFP)--Macro-level
                                                         Budgeting and Execution




                                                                                   President's Budget--FYDP:                   force mission or a support mission of DoD and
                                                                                                                               contains the resources necessary to achieve a                                                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                               broad objective or plan
                                                                                                                                  -Program Element (PE)--Primary data
                                                                                                                               element in the FYDP and normally the smallest
                                                                                                                               aggregation of resources controlled by the
                                                                                                                               Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD)
                                                                                                                                   --R-Forms, P-Forms, Other Forms

                                                                                                                               DoD Regulation 7000.14-R, Financial
                                                                                                                               Management Regulation, Volume 2                                                                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                               DoD Regulation 7000.14-R, Financial
                                                                                                                               Management Regulation, Volume 2                                                                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                               OSD
                                                                                   Submission to Congress:
                                                                                   DoD submits a biennial budget in which
                                                                                   the first two years of the six-year FYDP                                                                                                                                                                                              
                                                                                   period are submitted to Congress as fully
                                                                                   supported "stand alone" budgets.
                                                                                   Program Change Proposals (PCPs)             Services, Defense Agencies, and COCOMs
                                                                                   Budget Change Proposals (BCPs)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                               Concurrent with the Program and Budget
                                                                                   Execution Review                            reviews                                                                                                                                                                                                               21
                                                                                              DoDAF Must Relate to Core
                                                                                                    Processes




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Organizational Structure
                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Information And Data

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Reification Levels
                                                                                                                                                                                                 Resource Flow




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Capability
                                                                                                                                                                                     Performer




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Pedigree




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Location
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Services




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Measure
 DoD Core




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Project



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Rules
                                                                                                                                       Primary Directive, Instruction, or
 Process/                                                                                    Core Process Primary Products
                                                                                                                                             Decision Authority
Sub-Process




                                                                                                                                     DoD
                                                                                                                                     DoDD 8115.01 October 10, 2005, Information
                                                                                                                                     Technology Portfolio Management
                                                                                                                                     OMB
                                                                                                                                     Circular A-11, Exhibits 53 and 300
                                                                                                                                     Congressional
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             DRAFT
                                          Information Technology Portfolio Management




                                                                                                                                      -E-Government Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-
                                                                                        Component Portfolio--IT investments align    347), December 17, 2002
 Cappability Portfolio Management (CPM)




                                                                                                                                      -FY03 DoD Appropriation House Report 4546,
                                                                                        to Mission Area, and subportfolio or
                                                                                                                                     Title III, Section 351
                                                                                        capability area portfolios as appropriate:    -FY05 National Defense Authorization Act,
                                                                                         -Warfighting Mission Area (WMA)             "Defense Business Enterprise Architecture,
                                                                                         -Business Mission Area (BMA)                System Accountability, and Conditions for                                                                                                                                                 
                                                                                         -DoD portion of Intelligence Mission Area   Obligation of Funds for Defense Business
                                                         DoDD 8115.01




                                                                                                                                     System Modernization," Sec 332 § 2222 (h)
                                                                                        (DIMA)                                       Budget Information
                                                                                         -Enterprise Information Environment
                                                                                        (EIE) Mission Area (EIEMA)                 Note:
                                                                                                                                     Investments > $30M, information similar to EX
                                                                                                                                     300/Capital Investment Report (CIR)
                                                                                                                                     For Investment >$10M but <$30M, minimal
                                                                                                                                     program information (Name, Description,
                                                                                                                                     Funding request)




                                                                                        Identify opportunities for IT investments,
                                                                                        and resolve cross-Mission Area issues
                                                                                        Establish guidance for managing
                                                                                        portfolios
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
                                                                                        Provide strategic direction for the
                                                                                        Enterprise portfolio

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  22
                                                                                          DoDAF Must Relate to Core
                                                                                                Processes
                                                                                                                                                                                                               DRAFT




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Organizational Structure
                                                                                                                                                                                                        Information And Data

                                                                                                                                                                                                                               Reification Levels
                                                                                                                                                                                        Resource Flow




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               Capability
                                                                                                                                                                            Performer




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Pedigree




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Location
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Services




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Measure
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Project
 DoD Core




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Rules
                                                                                                                               Primary Directive, Instruction, or
 Process/                                                                               Core Process Primary Products
                                                                                                                                     Decision Authority
Sub-Process




                                                                                                                             DoDD 7045.20 Capability Portfolio Management
 Cappability Portfolio Management (CPM)

                                          Cappability Portfolio Management (CPM)




                                                                                   Joint Capability Profiles (JCA Tier 1):   2008
                                                                                    -Command and Control                      -Deputy’s Advisory Working Group (DAWG)
                                                                                    -Battle Space Awareness                   -Joint Requirements Oversight Council
                                                                                                                             (JROC)
                                                                                    -Net Centric
                                                                                                                              -Defense Acquisition Board (DAB)
                                                                                    -Logistics                               JCA Management Plan (JCAMP), 27 January                                                                                                                                                  
                                                       DoDD 7045.20




                                                                                    -Building Partnerships                   2010
                                                                                    -Protection
                                                                                    -Force Support
                                                                                    -Force Application
                                                                                    -Corporate Management and Support
                                                                                                                             DoDD 7045.20 Capability Portfolio Management
                                                                                                                             2008
                                                                                                                              -Deputy’s Advisory Working Group (DAWG)
                                                                                   Capability Portfolio Strategic Plans
                                                                                   CPM Recommendations
                                                                                                                              -Joint Requirements Oversight Council                                                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                             (JROC)
                                                                                                                              -Defense Acquisition Board (DAB)




DRAFT
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    23
                                                                     DoDAF Must Relate to Core
                                                                           Processes
                                                                                                                                                                                                DRAFT




                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Organizational Structure
                                                                                                                                                                         Information And Data

                                                                                                                                                                                                Reification Levels
                                                                                                                                                         Resource Flow




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Capability
                                                                                                                                             Performer




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  Pedigree




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               Location
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Services




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Measure
 DoD Core




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Project



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Rules
                                                                                                        Primary Directive, Instruction, or
 Process/                                                       Core Process Primary Products
                                                                                                              Decision Authority
Sub-Process




                                                           Joint Capabilities Document (JCD)         CJCSI 3170-01G                                                                                                                                                           
                                     Requirements
                                     Development




                                                           Initial Cpabilities Document (ICD)        CJCSI 3170-01G                                                                                                                                                           
Joint Capabilities Integration and
  Development System (JCIDS)




                                                           Cpabilities Development Document (CDD) CJCSI 3170-01G                                        
                                                           Cpabilities Production Document
                                                           Document (CPD)
                                                                                                     CJCSI 3170-01G                                     
                                                           Net Readiness Key Performance
                                                           parameter (NR-KPP)
                                                                                                                                                        
                                        Interoperability




                                                                                                     CJCS 6212_01E/F
                                                           (Mission Analysis (MA) , Information
                                                           Analysis (InA), Systems Engineering (SE))


                                                           Information Support Plan (ISP)
                                                           Enhanced Information Support Plan (EISP) CJCS 6212_01E/F                                     
                                                           Tailored Information Support Plan (TISP)




           DRAFT
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           24
                                                            DoDAF Must Relate to Core
                                                                  Processes
                                                                                                                                                                                              DRAFT




                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Organizational Structure
                                                                                                                                                                       Information And Data

                                                                                                                                                                                              Reification Levels
                                                                                                                                                       Resource Flow




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Capability
                                                                                                                                           Performer




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Pedigree




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Location
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           Services




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Measure
  DoD Core




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Project



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           Rules
                                                                                                      Primary Directive, Instruction, or
  Process/                                                  Core Process Primary Products
                                                                                                            Decision Authority
 Sub-Process
                            Joint Strategic Planning




                                                        -National Military Strategy (NMS)
                                                        -Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan (JSCP)
                                System (JSPS)




                                                        -Guidance for Employment of The Force       CJCSI 3100_01B                                    
                                                       (GEF)
                                                        -CJCS Risk Assessment
                                                        -Unified Command Plan (UCP)
  Operations Planning




                                                       Guidance for the Development of the
                                                       Force (GDF)
                                                                                                    CJCSI 3100_01B                                    

                                                       Operations Plans (OPLANS)
                        Joint Operations Planning




                                                        -Time-Phased Force and Deployment
                          and Execution System




                                                       Data (TPFDD)                                 CJCSM 3122.02B
                                                                                                    CJCSM 3122.01
                                                        -ROE/Rules for the Use of Force (RUF)       CJCSM 3122.03                                     
                                                        -Commander’s Critical Information
                                (JOPES)




                                                       Requirements (CCIRs)


                                                       Communications System Estimate (CSE)         CJCSM 3122.01                                                                                                                                                                     
                                                       Functional Plans (FUNCPLAN)                  CJCSM 3122.01                                                                                                                                                                     
                                                       Operation Orders (OPORDs)                    CJCSM 3122.01                                                                                                                                                                     

DRAFT                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        25
DoDAF-DM2 WG
  Objectives



               26
      DoDAF-DM2 is under formal
         configuration control
• Architecture Standards Review
  Group CONOPS
  – Roles, Responsibilities, and Processes
  – ASRG -- FOGO / SES level
  – Federated Architecture Council – 06
    level
• DoDAF and DM2 CM Plan
  – Configuration Identification
  – Organizational Roles, Responsibilities,
    and Interactions
  – CM Processes and Procedures
  – CM Business Rules
                                              27
                   FAC is Small Formal Voting Body
                     WG is Large & Collaborative




                                                                                   Marine
                                                                          Army

                                                                                   Corps




                                                                                                       DISA
                                                                                                DISA




                                                                                                              DISA
                                      NSA




                                                                DoN
                                                   AF
                                                                                                                                                    * Some C/S/A have
                                                                                                                                                      multiple members


                                              FAC – Voting – 23* votes                                                       DoD
                                                                                                                             CIO
                                                                                                                             • DoDAF-DM2 Configuration Status Accounting




                                                                          DCMO

                                                                                    USD(I)
                                                              JCS J6
                                               STRATCOM




                                                                                                       AT&L
                                      JFCOM




                                                                                                P&R
                                                                                                                               Report (CSAR)




                                                                                                              CIO
                                                                                                              DNI
  CR Technical Redirectoin •                                                                                                 • DoDAF-DM2 Baseline Status
CR Prioritization Redirectoin •                                                                                              • DoDAF-DM2 WG Activity Summaries
                                                                                                                             • COI Metrics and Progress Report




                                                                          Core Process
                         Framework                                                                                    Framework &
                                                                          Stakeholders
                           Groups                                               • CJCSI revs
                                                                       • AT&L SoSE & Acq Reform
                                                                                                                     Ontology Groups
                                                                                                                      • OMG / INCOSE / NDIA
                                                                                                                                                    • 400+
                      • OMG / INCOSE / NDIA
                     • MODAF / NAF / TOGAF
                          • FEA / FSAM
                                                                          • Combatant Command
                                                                                 architectures
                                                                                                                           • IDEAS / NAF
                                                                                                                              • UCORE                 members
                                                                             • CPM Governance                        • Enterprise Vocabularies
                                                                                   • PA&E                                                             + ~12 new
             DoDAF-DM WG – Collaborative – Agreed-upon business rules                                                                                 each week
                      enable analysis of different opinions                                                                                         • Meets bi-
                         Vendors
                                                                                                                                                      weekly
                          • EA/ITA Tool                                  Data Exchange                               COI Coordination
                              • M&S                                               • Pilots                               Groups
                         • Data Analysis                                     • Early Adopters                            • DoD MDR WG
                           • Repository                                        • Federation                             • DoD COI Forum
                       • Data Integration


                                                          To join, go to DoDAF 2.0 website                                                                    28
         Bi-weekly WG Meetings
•   Collaboration site
•   Readaheads and notebooks
•   References folders
•   Discussion groups
•   CR Submission
•   Tools




                                 29
            Monthly Report to FAC
• Purposes:
   – Full visibility of WG activities and
     plans
   – Opportunity for FAC re-direction
       • Technical
       • Prioritization
• Action Item / Change Request
  Status
• Configuration Status
  Accounting Report
                                                                                    CI
   – Summary of WG activities                                              DM2     DoDAF     PES
                                                             OBE       2       2         0      0
   – Change Request Summary                          Defer to 2.04
                                             In Progress for 2.03
                                                                      37
                                                                      50
                                                                              32
                                                                              30
                                                                                         2
                                                                                        15
                                                                                                3
                                                                                                5
   – Detailed status of all open                      Unassigned
                                            Consult IDEAS Group
                                                                      66
                                                                      19
                                                                              35
                                                                              16
                                                                                        25
                                                                                         2
                                                                                                6
                                                                                                1
     Change Requests                                         Defer    90      80         5      5
                                                       In Ver 2.03    31      29         2      0
                                                         Rejected      3       2         1      0
                                              No Action Required       0       0         0      0
                                                                     298     226       30
                                                                                        52     20
                             DoDAF-DM2 WG Change
                               Request Processing
                                                                                                                                                                             Monthly
             FAC

                                                                                                                                                                                             FAC vote to
                                          Yes
                                                                                                                                                                                              redirect?
        Custodian
         CI & CR




                                                                                 Record:                                      Update status (defer,
                                                              Enter into   “defer” and planned                                 reject, in-progress)             Record as “done in
                                                              system as     version (if known)                                  and, if necessary,                   v2.xx”
                                                            “unassigned”          Reject                                      CoA and actionee(s)
                                                                           CoA and actionee(s)



                                                                                                                                                      No

                                                                                                                                         Yes                     Minority                    Report non-
                             Change Request                                                                                                                    member non-             Yes   currence to
        CR Originators and




                             submitted via WG                                                                                                                   concurr?                        FAC
                                   web
           Actionee(s)




                                                                             Discuss problem
                                                                             and CoA: defer,
                                                                             reject, or select                                                                   Impact:
                              Change Request                                     CoA and                                                                        Biz rules
                              communicated to                                   actionee(s)                                          More work
                                                                                                                                                                Programs
                               WG CR Tracker                                                                                                                    Vendors
                                                                                                         See “Detailed CR
                                                                                                          Processing” for
                                                                                                                                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                                   Yes
                                                                                                           amplification

                                                                                                                                        Provide
                                                                               Present and                                            research                 Discuss new
                                                                                                                                                      CR WG
                                                                               prepared to                       No                    findings,                 CoA and
                                                                                                                                                      review
                                                                                 discuss                                               possible                actionee(s)
                                                                                                                                    solutions, etc.
                                                                                                                                                                                       Yes

                                                                                                                      Conduct Meeting

                                                Bi-weekly                                                  Move to bottom
                                                                                                             of queue
                                                                           Call for “unassigned”                                    Facilitate CoA              Facilitate
             WG Secretary




                                                                             originators to brief                                    updates by
                                                                               their CRs and                                                                   FAC redirect
                                 Prepare readahead:                                                           Facilitate             actionee(s)                  CoA
                                                                           facilitate discussions                topic
                                  Next batch of                                                                                                                revisions                    Report to FAC:
                                   “unassigned”                                                              discussions                                                                      WG activity
                                  Topics selected at                                                                                                                                          summary
                                   last meeting                                                                                                                                                  CSAR
                                  Material submitted                                                                                                                                         FAC redirect
                                   by Actionee(s)                                                        WG Business Rules                                                                      impacts
                                  FAC redirects                                                           Data Dictionary
                                                                                                                                                                 Call for
                                                                                                                                                                topics for
                                                                                                    Current and working baselines
                                                                                                                                                                  next
                                                                                                            CR database
                                                                                                                                                                 meeting
                                                                                                             DM2 models

DRAFT                                                                                                Core process requriements




                                                                                                                                                                                                              31
                      DoDAF CR Detailed
                         Processing
                                                                                        CR requests
                                                                                                                                             CR requests delete
                START      CR requests new view                     No                change to existing                    No
                                                                                                                                               existing view
                                                                                            view




                                     Yes
                                                                                             Yes
                                                                                                                 DRAFT
                                                                                                                                                     Yes
                                                        New or changed                 Request delete
                                           Yes                                 No                                                      Yes
                                                           artifacts                  artifacts from view


                              Artifacts required
                 No           by core process                                                                      Delete                     Artifacts required
                                 governance                                                                       artifacts            No     by core process
                                                                                                                 from view                       governance
                                                               No

                                     Yes
                                                                                                                 All artifacts                       Yes
                                                                                                            No
                                                                                                                  deleted?
                              Artifacts included
                      No
                               in existing view                                                                                              Artifacts included in
                                                                                                                                                                      No
                                                           Consistency,                                              Yes                         existing view
                                                        alias, other QA or
                                                 No   view description style                                     Delete view
                                    Yes
                                                           guide issues                                                                              Yes


                             Subset required by
                No                                                                                                                           Subset required by
                              CP governance                                                                                                                          Yes
                                                                                                                                              CP governance



                                     Yes               Yes                                                                                           No

                                                                                                                                                 Delete view
                                  New or                 Yes             DD Process                                                               Notify CP
                               changed terms                                                                                                    governance of
                                                                                                                                               change to other
                                                                                                                                                    view
                                     No


                                     New                  Relationship
                                 relationship              Process


                                     No
                                                                                                                                 END
                            Construct IAW view
                           description style guide:
        Mark CR as                  Name                                                                                                                             Mark CR as
                                                                                        Mark CR as Done                     CR WG
         Rejected                “One-liner”                                                                                                                          Rejected
                                                                                                                            review

DRAFT                            Description
                                 CP Usage
                               DM2 mapping



                                                                                                                                                                                  32
                                    DM2 CR Detailed
                                      Processing
                                   CR requests new term
                                                                                                                                    DRAFT
                     START                                              No
                                    or definition change




                                           Yes


                                      Collect source
        DD Process                    definitions and                  CR requests DM2
                                       enter in DD                    relationship change




                                                                                            Yes                                   Alternatives
                                     Review and pick
                                      or formulate
                                        definition

                                                                                                                                      Yes



                                                                                                          Evaluate restitch
                                                                             New                             impact: what           Negative
                                       New or alias?                                         No
                                                                         relationship                    definitions and other       impact
                           Alias                        New                                                 rqmts effected


                                                                                                                                      No             No
                                                                             Yes
                                                    Determine
                       Enter mapped
             END                                  supertype using
                           terms
                                                  BORO analysis          Determine                                               Make change to
                                                                                                        Relationship                 DM2
                                                                       supertype using
                                                                                                         Process
                                                                       BORO analysis


                                                      Determine
                                                                                                                                                               CR WG
                                                   relationships in                                                                                                     END
                                                                                                             Make change to                                    review
                                                         DM2           Can a supertype
                                                                                                  Yes        DM2, add to DD,
DRAFT                                                                   be determined
                                                                                                               and define

                                                                              No

                                                                                                                                                  Mark CR as
                                                                        Should it be an                                No                          Rejected
                     Add as alias to DD                    Yes
                                                                           alias?



                                                                                                                                                                              33
                                                        DoDAF-DM2 Version
                                                            Process
                                                                                                                                                                                       Collect
                                                                                                        FAC vote to re-                                                              Component
                                                                                                                                                Monthly                                                                                                  Notify
                                                                                                          prioritize?                                                                comments
     FAC




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Components
                                                                                FAC vote to
                                                                                 redirect?
                                                                                                                                                                        Issue tasker for
                                                                                                                                                                                                                      DRAFT                             of new
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        version

                                                                                                                                                                       Component review



                                     Update status (defer,
Custodian




                                                                Record:                                                                 Conduct
                                      reject, in-progress)
 CI & CR




                                                               Date of WG                                                                                                                                     Conduct
                                       and, if necessary,                                                                             production of                                                                              Conduct       Post to
                                                                approval                                                                                                                                    production of
                                     CoA and actionee(s)                                                          Restatus as            draft for              Conduct QA:                                                     QA: tech       DoDAF
                                                                                                                                                                                                                final:
                                                                                                                  “in progress”        Component                  tech edit,                                                        edit,    website &             Archive
                                                                                                                                                                                                             document,
                     Yes                                                                   Update date               for next            review:                IDEAS tools,                                                      IDEAS         MDR;               “dones”
                                                                                                                                                                                      Re-status                IDEAS
                                                                                            of status                version           document,                 XML tools                                                         tools,    deprecate
                                                                                                                                                                                     affected CR            model, XSD,
                                                                                             update                                  IDEAS model,                                                                               XML tools   prior version
                                                                                                                                                                                                                VDD
                                                                                                                                       XSD, VDD


                     Yes
                                                                                Report non-
                                                                   Yes          currence to
                                                                                   FAC
                                                                                                Yes
CR Originators and




                                              No                                   Yes
                                                                                                                       No
   Actionee(s)




                                                                                  Minority
                                                                                member non-
                                                                                 concurr?

                                                                                        Can make cutoff
                                                                Majority
                                                                                       and / or priority for
                                                             present agree?
                                                                                             version

                                                                                                                                                                                                                Yes


                                                             Present solution            Provide status of
                                                               and discuss                  solution(s)




                                            Bi-weekly
     WG Secretary




                                                             Conduct Technical Cutoff Meeting                  Report to FAC:
                           Prepare for technical                                                                CR’s “done”
                                                                                                                                                                  Request
                                   cutoff:                                                                       for version
                                                                                                                                                                entry of draft
                            CR’s actionee(s)                                                                   CR’s             Technical cutoff &                                  Facilitate
                                                                                                                                                                version into
                             consider complete               Call for “done”             Call for “in            planned for          no FAC re-                                     normal CR                              All comments      Request
                                                                                                                                                          Yes     SACP &                            Report to
                             & ready for WG                  actionee(s) to               progress”              version           prioritizations or                               processing of                           resolved & no   promulgation
                                                                                                                                                                  tasker to
                             review                          brief their CRs             actionee(s)            Version               redirects                                     re-statused
                                                                                                                                                                                                      FAC
                                                                                                                                                                                                                            FAC redirects      notice
                                                                                                                                                                Components
                            CR’s in progress                                                                    release                                                                CR’s
                                                                                                                                                                 to review
                            FAC redirects                                                                       timeline &
                                                                                                                 any issues
                                                                                                                                                                                                         No
                                                                                           No




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         34
           Current DoDAF-DM2 WG
                 Participants
• Over 450 members
   – Military, Government, Industry, Vendors, Academia, and
     professional organizations
   – Operators, architects, tool developers, repository operators, and
     data analysts
   – All FAC Components represented + IC
• Monthly participants and full member list reported to FAC
  in monthly CSAR
• Imminent tasker to Components to identify their WG
  representative(s)
   – Multiple reps will be OK, e.g., Navy could choose SPAWAR,
     NAVSEA, NAVAIR, OPNAV, and ASN RDA


                                                                     35
       DoDAF-DM2 WG Challenges
1. WG growth – from a dozen members to over 400,
   adding ~ 12 / week
   – A new member orientation package to be automatically sent
     upon registration is being developed
2. Separating material that needs to be controlled from
   that that doesn’t
   – E.g., “History of the DoDAF” probably does not warrant formal
     review by Components and control by the FAC
   – Conversely, the viewpoints/views and DM2 do
3. Cleanup of legacy text and focus of viewpoints/views
   towards six core processes
   – Wordsmithing is insufficient to resolve
   – Tools that will help: FEAF, Core Process information analyses,
     and DM2 disambiguation power

                                                                     36
     DoDAF-DM2 WG Way Ahead

1. ASRG & FAC Governance to be updated
2. FAC Component reps formal tasker soon to be
   issued
3. Version tempo to slow to annual or semi-
   annual
4. Versions will go through review by Components
   by formal tasker
5. Predicted future CR sources:
  – Coordination with FEAF, JARM, and CUDEAF
  – Core process initiatives, e.g., IT Acquisition Reform
                                                            37
        DoD Architectures COI WG is
             being considered
                                            DRAFT

• Would cover, perhaps on a rotating basis:
   – Architecture information sharing needs
   – Architecture standards (i.e., DoDAF, DM2, others)
   – Architecture tools (i.e., current vendor list, DARS,
     others)
   – Architecture relevance in core processes and
     governance
   – Architecture federation
   – Architecture best practices

DRAFT
                                                            38
      Welcome!
We look forward to your
     participation.




                          39

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:35
posted:11/6/2012
language:Latin
pages:39