Get documents about "Project Description
Document Sample
California State University
Capital Planning, Design and Construction
COBCP Project Description
Capital Outlay Program xxxx-xxxx
(Form CPDC 1-4)
Campus: <Campus name should be underlined>
Project: <Project title should be underlined>
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: (Provide a brief description of project)
<Start Here>
A. PURPOSE OF THE PROJECT: (Problem, program need, infrastructure deficiency)
<Start Here>
B. RELATIONSHIP TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN: (Relevance of proposal to fulfilling campus
strategic plan goals)
<Start Here>
C. ALTERNATIVES: (For each, describe the proposed alternative and provide brief summary of scope,
cost, funding source, program benefits, facility management benefits, and impact on support budget)
<Start Here>
D. RECOMMENDED SOLUTION:
1. Which alternative and why?
<Start Here>
2. Project delivery method.
(CM @ Risk, Design/Bid /Build, Design/Build)
<Start Here>
3. Detailed scope description.
<Start Here>
4. Basis for cost information.
<Start Here>
5. CEQA mitigation costs, on and off-site. (Explain calculations for how these costs are derived)
<Start Here>
6. Factors/benefits recommended solution other than the least expensive alternative.
<Start Here>
7. Complete description of impact on support budget. (Include relocation and temporary surge
space costs for inclusion on FIW)
<Start Here>
8. Identify and explain any project risks.
<Start Here>
Campus Initials – Name of Project Page 1 of 3 Date
9. List requested interdepartmental coordination and/or special project approval (Including
mandatory reviews and approvals, off-site mitigation agreements, e.g. technology proposals).
Fire Marshal, Division of State Architect Plan Check Firm, CSU Seismic Review Board, etc.
E. CONSISTENCY WITH CHAPTER 1016, STATUTES OF 2002 – AB 857 requires information to
be included in all proposals for funding state infrastructure to assure that the project goals are
consistent with state planning priorities to help prevent urban sprawl.
1. Does the recommended solution (project) promote infill development by rehabilitating existing
infrastructure and how? Explain.
<Start Here>
2. Does the project improve the protection of environmental and agricultural resources by
protecting and preserving the state’s most valuable natural resources? Explain.
<Start Here>
3. Does the project encourage efficient development patterns by ensuring that infrastructure
associated with development, other than infill, support efficient use of land and is appropriately
planned for growth? Explain.
<Start Here>
F. COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GLOBAL CLIMATE SOLUTIONS ACT (AB 32) – Division
25.5, commencing with Section 38500 of Health and Safety Code AB 32 requires green house gas
(GHG) emissions be reduced to 1990 levels by 2020. Please complete the following GHG emissions
table for all major capital projects including capital renewal projects. Projects that have no
mechanical, electrical, gas or building envelope components may request an exemption from this
requirement. Please provide exemption requests to your University Planner. An example of a
completed GHG emissions table is included for reference on the following page.
1. In the table below, cells A1 through A3, insert the current annual utility usage for the building(s)
affected by the project (Note: new construction = 0). In cells B1 through B3, insert the projected
annual utility usage after project completion. Calculate the net change and insert in column C,
thus B - A = C. Multiply column C times column D to calculate the change in CO₂ emissions and
insert in column E, thus C x D = E. Energy efficiency projects will result in a net reduction and
thus a negative value in columns C and E. For new construction projects there is no current
utility usage, so the projected usage will be a positive number and equal to the net change.
2. Insert 1990 and 2006 GHG emissions from the “CSU 1990-2006 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Report by Campus” (http://calstate.edu/cpdc/peu/sustainability.shtml) into cells E4 and E5.
Take the sum of E1 through E3 and insert that in the “Net Change due to project” cell E6. Then
calculate the total emissions by adding (or subtracting) the “Net Change due to project” to the
“2006 GHG Emissions” value (E5 + E6). New construction will typically result in an increased
campus total.
A B C D E
Current Projected Net Change Net Change
CO2
Bldg/Facilit Bldg/Facilit Bldg/Facilit (Metric
Unit Conversion
y Annual y Annual y Annual Tons of
Factor
Usage Usage Usage CO2)
1 Project kWh 0.0003655
Campus Initials – Name of Project Page 2 of 3 Date
Total
2 therms 0.0052945
3 Water-CCF 0.0013685
4 1990 Campus GHG Emissions (Certified Report)
Totals
5 2006 Campus GHG Emissions (Certified Report)
(Metri
6 c Tons Net Change relative to 2006 due to project (E1 + E2 +E3)
of CO2)
Total Campus GHG Emissions relative to 2006 levels upon project
7
completion (E5+ E6)
8 Emissions Reduction to reach 2020 goal of 1990 levels (E7-E4)
Example: San Diego State University, Aztec Center
A B C D E
Current Projected Net Change Net Change
CO2
Bldg/Facilit Bldg/Facilit Bldg/Facilit (Metric
Unit Conversion
y Annual y Annual y Annual Tons of
Factor
Usage Usage Usage CO2)
1 kWh 1,647,614 1,273,668 (373,946 ) 0.0003655 (137)
Project
2 therms 9,291 21,664 12,373 0.0052945 66
Total
3 Water-CCF 645 600 (45) 0.0013685 (0.09)
4 1990 Campus GHG Emissions (Certified Report) 35,755
Totals
5 2006 Campus GHG Emissions (Certified Report) 58,127
(Metri
6 c Tons Net Change due to project (E1 + E2 + E3) (71)
of CO2)
Total Campus GHG Emissions relative to 2006 levels upon project
7 58,055
completion (E5 + E6)
8 Emissions Reduction to reach 2020 goal of 1990 levels (E7-E4) 22,300
3. Describe how the campus plans to comply with the California Global Climate Solutions Act
(AB 32) by either mitigating GHG increases or implementing overall GHG reductions.
<Start Here>
Campus Initials – Name of Project Page 3 of 3 Date
