Contract Allocation Proposal, CIWMB 225 (Revised July 2007)

Document Sample
Contract Allocation Proposal, CIWMB 225 (Revised July 2007) Powered By Docstoc
					Board Meeting                                                                                     Agenda Item 14
June 17, 2008                                                                                       Attachment 1



State of California                                                                      California Integrated Waste
CIWMB 225 (Rev. 7/07)                                                                            Management Board
                            CONTRACT ALLOCATION PROPOSAL

Project Title: Three Part Test Validation
Program/Office: WCMP                                       Concept No.:        2008-D-1
Requestor/Primary Contact: Mark de Bie                     Fund (IWMA, Oil, RMDZ, etc.):            IWMA
Estimated Contract Amount: $ 150,000
I.      PROPOSAL OVERVIEW
        In support of Strategic Directive 8.4, this contract will provide analyses of waste and material
        handling activities that have been successful in operating with little or no environmental, or public
        health and safety impacts and regulatory models associated with them from other states. These
        analyses would be utilized in identifying, defining, and ultimately determining the level of
        regulatory oversight that may be required for activities operating within California.

        One of the current methods in California for determining if a waste and material activity needs to be
        within the regulatory oversight of the CIWMB is the "3 part test". This test is designed to identify
        recycling centers that are not regulated by the CIWMB. There have been a number of stakeholders
        that have provided testimony that the "3 part test" does not adequately differentiate activities that
        handling material streams may result for commercial or multifamily dwells. The current regulations
        were developed based on informal surveys of recycling and waste handling facilities that had been
        established prior to 1996. Changes have occurred since 1996 in how materials are collected, handled
        and processed. The current regulations may not fully address these changes, especially relative to
        new technologies, markets and advances in science-based environmental and public health
        mitigation measures.

        Other states have approached defining activities associated with waste and material recycling in
        various ways. Analyses of various models and methods for drawing distinctions would help in
        developing a California-specific method. Identification and description of management practices
        that reduce or avoid impacts that could be included in a methodology would also be of benefit in
        crafting a California-specific method. Additionally, an assessment of current practices within
        California that could be utilized to maintain levels within the "3 part test" would assist in
        understanding the current situation. The analyses would be utilized to develop revisions to the
        current regulations relative to recycling centers and transfer/processing facilities.

        The study would examine models and methods that other states use to make determinations relative
        to regulatory oversight of activities that handle materials for recycling and activities handling solid
        waste. Models that identify and address waste streams by type and potential environmental and
        public health risk would be of highest priority. The study would also examine best management
        practices that have been successfully implemented and may have been utilized in making
        determination relative to the level of regulatory oversight, especially those that address issues based
        on waste stream types and potential risk associated with them. An assessment of the methods used
        to determine potential risk would be included. Additionally, there would be review of current
        practices utilized in California that assist activities to comply with the "3 part test".


                                                                                                                   1
Board Meeting                                                                                Agenda Item 14
June 17, 2008                                                                                  Attachment 1



       Expected outcomes would include a detailed description and analysis of other state models and
       recommendation on ones that could be utilized in California. An additional outcome would be a
       detailed description and analysis and recommendation of best management practices for activities
       that handle materials for recycling and how they could be utilized in California as part of the
       regulatory schema. There would also be an assessment of how the current infrastructure under
       current regulation would be affected by the application of a different model for determining
       regulatory oversight. These outcomes would support a staff-driven review of current regulations and
       potential revision to the regulatory schema in California. Without the study, the effort to complete a
       through review and revision of the regulations would be significantly delayed.

II.    PRIMARY TASKS, DELIVERABLES AND MILESTONES
       Tasks
       1. Identify states and programs that have requirements regarding recycling and transfer stations - two
       weeks from beginning of contract.
       2. Identify the various models and best management practices associated with the state regulatory
       programs - 2 weeks from task 1.
       3. Analysis of models and best management practices relative to how they are applied, including
       case studies and current practices used in California to maintain compliance with the "3 part test" -
       one month from task 2.
       4. Analysis of models, including pros and cons, relative to how they address current science, market
       dynamics, and new technologies - 2 weeks from task 3.
       5. Recommendations of models and best management practices that could be applied to the
       infrastructure in California - one month from task 4.
       6. Analysis of models that identify and address issues associated with specific waste streams and the
       potential impacts to the environment and public health and the methods used in the models to
       determine potential risks– concurrent with task 5.
       7. Analysis of how application of the models and best management practices would change the
       current status of the infrastructure currently regulated in California - two weeks from task 5.
       8. Final report including results from task 1-7 and complete and final recommendations - two weeks
       from task 6.

       Total timeframe - four to five months.




                                                                                                              2

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:2
posted:11/4/2012
language:Unknown
pages:2