Get documents about "Logical Framework
Document Sample
PROJECT NAME Strengthening village education in South Sudan
IMPACT Impact Indicator 1 Baseline (2010) Milestone 1 (July Milestone 2 (July Target (July 2014)
2012) 2013)
To contribute to MDG 2 and 3 by Number and proportion of girls enrolled in primary Planned 224,063; 39.4% 234,594; 40% 250,780; 41% 267,080; 42%
improving access to and quality of schools in the 4 states of South Sudan Achieved
education in South Sudan, Source
especially for girls.
Impact Indicator 2 Baseline Milestone 1 Milestone 2 Target
Planned
Achieved
Source
OUTCOME Outcome Indicator 1 Baseline (2010) Milestone 1 (July Milestone 2 (July Target ( July 2014) Assumptions
2012) 2013)
Improved provision and access to Gap between proportion of girls enrolled in project Planned -3.10% -2% -1% 0 Security situation does not
education especially for girls in four schools and non-project schools Achieved significantly worsen; continued
states of South Sudan by Source cooperation of MoE and
empowering civil society to better Baseline and end of project data, monthly monitoring, EMIS reports stakeholders; continued
understand and advocate for their Outcome Indicator 2 Baseline (2011) Milestone 1 (July Milestone 2 (July Target (July 2014) commitment of MoE to primary
rights and engage in local and 2012) 2013) education especially for girls.
government decision making Number and proportion of girls enrolled in project Planned 12,868 girls; 36.6% 13,000; 37% 13,350; 38% 13,800; 39.4%
schools Achieved
Source
Monthly monitoring data, baseline and end of project data, EMIS data
Outcome Indicator 3 Baseline (2011) Milestone 1 (July Milestone 2 (July Target (July 2014)
2012) 2013)
Number and proportion of girls in grades 4 - 8 in Planned 3,536 girls; 27.5% 3,650; 28% 3,870; 29% 4,290 girls; 31%
project schools Achieved
Source
Monthly monitoring data, baseline and end of project data, EMIS data
INPUTS (£) DFID (£) Govt (£) Other (£) Total (£) DFID SHARE (%)
480,637.37 100%
INPUTS (HR) DFID (FTEs)
0.3 Project Manager; 0.1 Finance officer; 0.1
Logistics officer; 0.3 x 4 ROLE managers; 0.3 x 4
Project officers; 0.5 x 12 Outreach Officers; 0.3 x 4
Admin
Updated January 2011
OUTPUT 1 Output Indicator 1.1 Baseline Milestone 1 (July 12) Milestone 2 Target (July 2012) Assumption
Increased capacity of civil society Number of PTA members, school mothers and Planned Low capacity 530 F; 790 M 530 F; 790 M Continued cooperation and interest
and communities to understand and CBO representatives trained in rights and Achieved 380 F; 903 M (Apr 12) of School Mothers, PTAs and CBOs
advocate for their rights to education advocacy Source in their roles in local education.
Training reports Continued demand of civil society to
Output Indicator 1.2 Baseline Milestone 1 (July Milestone 2 Target (July2013) be involved in local education
2013) decisions. Media providers willing to
No. of PTA members and School mothers and Planned Low literacy levels 530 F; 790 M trained 80% pass give coverage. Recruitment of
CBO representatives passing English for advocacy Achieved committed and competent English
course Source for Advocacy trainers
Test results and training reports
IMPACT WEIGHTING (%) Output Indicator 1.3 Baseline Milestone 1 Milestone 2 Target (date)
20% Planned
Achieved
Source RISK RATING
Low
INPUTS (£) DFID (£) Govt (£) Other (£) Total (£) DFID SHARE (%)
120,900.59 100%
INPUTS (HR) DFID (FTEs)
0.05 Project Manager; 0.25 Finance officer; 0.25
Logistics officer; 0.05 x 4 ROLE managers; 0.1 x 4
Project officers; 0.2 x 12 Outreach Officers; 0.1 x 4
Admin; Trainer 14 days; English tutors x 100 x 8
weeks
OUTPUT 2 Output Indicator 2.1 Baseline Milestone 1 (Feb 2012) Milestone 2 Target (Mar 2012) Assumptions
Increased capacity of ROLE centres Number of ROLE centre staff trained on rights and Planned 31 staff 4 31 (100%) ROLE centres remain committed to
to deliver education projects advocacy Achieved 7 30 the project and their roles.
Source
Training reports
Output Indicator 2.2 Baseline Milestone 1 (Jul 2012) Milestone 2 (Mar 2013) Target (July 2014)
Quality of delivery of projects as assessed in the Planned Gap between Managers Ability to deliver quality Mid - term review Final evaluation
Mid-term review and final evaluation as well as and other ROLE staff in presentations demonstrates quality in demonstrates quality in
through quarterly meetings where ROLE managers terms of ability and measuring progress project delivery project delivery
present progress against activities and indicators responsibilities. against activities and
indicators
Achieved
Source
Quarterly reports, mid-term review and final evaluation
IMPACT WEIGHTING (%) Output Indicator 2.3 Baseline Milestone 1 Milestone 2 Target (date)
25% Planned
Achieved
Source RISK RATING
Low
INPUTS (£) DFID (£) Govt (£) Other (£) Total (£) DFID SHARE (%)
24,608.72 100%
INPUTS (HR) DFID (FTEs)
0.1 Project Manager; 0.25 Finance officer; 0.25
Logistics officer; 0.1 x 4 ROLE managers; trainer 3
days
Updated January 2011
OUTPUT 3 Output Indicator 3.1 Baseline Milestone 1 (July Milestone 2 Target (July 2012) Assumptions
2012)
Improved government - civil society Number of MoE staff trained on working with Planned No understanding of 27 F; 63 M 27 F; 63 M MoE and Civil society willing to
engagement on local education communities on local education provision major constitutional attend engagement meetings;
provision changes on rights transport not disrupted by security or
Achieved 24 F; 83 M bad weather; GoSS remain
Source committed to education act
Training reports
Output Indicator 3.2 Baseline (2010) Milestone 1 (July Milestone 2 (July Target (July 2014)
2012) 2013)
Number of payam, county or state level meetings Planned Lack of engagement 8 20 32
held between civil society and MoE to discuss local with communities and
education delivery including sharing of information understanding of
on the education situation and priorities in education situation in
communities and activities and plans of the MoE rural schools
Achieved
Source
Meeting minutes and ROLE centre reports
IMPACT WEIGHTING (%) Output Indicator 3.3 Baseline Milestone 1 Milestone 2 Target (date)
20% Planned
Achieved
Source RISK RATING
Medium
INPUTS (£) DFID (£) Govt (£) Other (£) Total (£) DFID SHARE (%)
120,001.59 100%
INPUTS (HR) DFID (FTEs)
0.05 Project Manager; 0.25 Finance officer; 0.25
Logistics officer; 0.1 x 4 ROLE managers; 0.1 x 4
Project officers; 0.15 x 12 Outreach Officers; 0.1 x
4 Admin
OUTPUT 4 Output Indicator 4.1 Baseline Milestone 1 (Mar 2012) Milestone 2 Target (July 2014) Assumptions
Improved capacity of school Number of school mothers trained and conducting Planned 100 school mothers 100 trained 90% conducting weekly Commitment of MoE and civil
mothers to promote girls education weekly visits have demonstrated visits society stakeholders to support girls'
potential to take on education; School Mothers continue
greater roles and to be committed to their roles and to
responsibilities be allowed into schools to conduct
Achieved 100 activities.
Source
Monitoring reports, tracer studies
Output Indicator 4.2 Baseline Milestone 1 (Mar 2014) Milestone 2 Target (July 2014)
Number of community members viewing the girl Planned 0 120 viewers 3120 viewers
writes films (initially 120 MoE officials and CBO Achieved
representatives as part of advocacy and then a Source
viewing per community) Meeting reports
IMPACT WEIGHTING (%) Output Indicator 4.3 Baseline Milestone 1 Milestone 2 Target (date)
35% Planned 0
Achieved
Source RISK RATING
Low
INPUTS (£) DFID (£) Govt (£) Other (£) Total (£) DFID SHARE (%)
215,126.47 100%
INPUTS (HR) DFID (FTEs)
0.05 Project Manager; 0.25 Finance officer; 0.25
Logistics officer; 0.05 x 4 ROLE managers; 0.1 x 4
Project officers; 0.15 x 12 Outreach Officers; 0.1 x
4 Admin
Updated January 2011
