paper52971 1
Document Sample


A Novel Solid Catalyst Process for
Biodiesel Production
Dheeban Kannan
Jack V. Matson
June 25, 2008
12th Annual Green Chemistry and Engineering Conference
Washington, DC
Introduction
Biodiesel – fatty acid (m)ethyl esters
Importance – energy
environmental
economy
Motivation separation hassles
• Soluble liquid catalysts --> Solid catalysts
2
Background
1500
US Production
Million Gallons per Year
1200
EU Production
900
600
300
Source:
0 European Biodiesel Board
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 National Biodiesel Board
Current annual biodiesel potential of US: 280 million
gallons
Microalgae promises yields ~1000 times that of soybean
Solid catalysts – Crucial for large scale commercial
production
3
Background
Transesterification Reaction
R-COOCH2 CH2OH
l catalyst l
R-COOCH + 3 CH3OH ̶ ̶ ̶> 3 R-COOCH3 + CHOH
l l
R-COOCH2 CH2OH
triglyceride methanol methyl esters glycerol
(vegetable oil) (biodiesel)
where R denotes a hydrocarbon chain of carbon number 12~16.
Conventional Process Information
• Reactants immiscible – reaction at interface
• Liquid base catalysts used: 60˚C – 1.5 hr
• Separation of catalyst from product mixture poses
problems – additional processing units
• Feedstock with high free fatty acid content require
additional acid-catalyzed preceding step
• Wastewater
4
Lead-up to Current Research
Solid bases not effective for conventional reaction
conditions
Solid acids even behind in performance
Supercritical process1
• No catalyst, 350˚C, 500 atm, 4 min
• 40:1 Alcohol:Oil Molar ratio [conventional 6:1]
• Pressure too high, Thermal breakdown issues
• Critical Point: Methanol 240˚C, 80 atm,
Ethanol 247˚C, 65 atm
• With cosolvent2, 280˚C, 130 atm, 10 min
5 [1]. Saka, S. and Kusdiana, D., Fuel (2001) 225
[2]. Cao et al., Fuel 84 (2005) 347
Lead-up to Current Research
Critical regime desired for better miscibility
• Alcohol both as a reactant and as a cosolvent
Could mild solid bases be effective near critical regime?
Packed-Bed Reactor - High T okay for continuous
process
Suppes et al.3 tried calcium carbonate
• 260˚C, 70 atm, residence time 18 min
• 50% biodiesel as cosolvent, otherwise poor yield
6 [3]. Suppes et.al., J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., (2001) 139
Batch Tests
Batch reactors used initially to test and screen catalysts
Various weak solid base salts and mild metal oxide bases
were tested
Analytical Procedures: Gas Chromatography (GC)
Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC)
Certain metal oxides showed good results (Patent Pending)
• ~95% conversion in 18 min
Free fatty acid conversion of 93% observed. Probably
due to the amphoteric nature of metal oxides. Eliminates
the need of a separate acid-catalyzed preceding step.
7
Performance of Catalysts – Batch Tests
100
95
260 o C, 18 min
Biodiesel Conversion (%)
90
40:1 Alcohol:Oil Molar ratio
85
80
75
70
65
60
TiO Ca Al oxide MnO CaTiO3 CuO CaCO3 TiO2 no catalyst
8 * Catalysts tested at 220, 200, 175, 150 ˚C – similar trend
Lab-Scale Packed-Bed Reactor
Reactor Temperature 260˚C, Pressure ~70 atm
9
Lab-Scale Packed-Bed Reactor
100
90
Biodiesel Conversion (%)
80
70
60
TiO
50
CaTiO3
40
MnO (20-35 mesh)
40:1 Alcohol:Oil Molar ratio
30 CaCO3
260˚C, Pressure ~70 atm
20
0 5 10 15 20 25
Residence time (min)
10
Activity Sustenance Tests
• Performance of the catalysts checked for deterioration with time
• No deterioration for 200 hours
100
90
Biodiesel Conversion (%)
80
70
60
50
40
30
20 MnO (+200 mesh)
10
Residence time = 5 min
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Catalyst Run Time (hr)
11
Reaction Order
Pseudo first order reaction excess alcohol (40:1 ethanol:oil molar ratio)
X = 1 – e-kt
100 1
90
Biodiesel Conversion, X (%)
80 0.8
70
60 0.6
1-X
50
40 0.4
-0.2829 t
30
1-X = e
2
R = 0.9945
20 +200 mesh MnO 0.2
10
0 0
0 3 6 9 12 15 0 3 6 9 12 15
Residence time, t (min) Residence time, t (min)
12
Molar Ratio Tests
Optimal Molar-Ratio
•Balance the better medium of interaction provided by the excess
alcohol with reaction space
80 0.25 10
70
Biodiesel Conversion (%)
0.2 8
60
Rate constant, k
50 6
0.15
40
WHSV
rate constant
30 0.1 4
WHSV
20
MnO (+200 mesh) 0.05 2
10
Residence time = 5 min
0 0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50
Ethanol:Vegetable Oil Molar Ratio Ethanol:Vegetable Oil Molar Ratio
13
Pressure Effect
80 0.3
70
Biodiesel Conversion (%)
0.24
60
Rate constant, k
50 0.18
40
0.12
30
20 MnO (+200 mesh) 0.06
10
Residence time = 5 min
0 0
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500
Outlet Pressure (psi) Outlet Pressure (psi)
14
Near-Critical Regime
80 0.0
1.75E-03 1.90E-03 2.05E-03 2.20E-03 2.35E-03 2.50E-03
70 ~ 1070 psi -1.0
Biodiesel Conversion (%)
260° C
60 ~ sat. vapour P
240° C
-2.0
50 220° C
40:1 Molar ratio
MnO (+200 mesh),
Residence time = 5 min
ln k
200° C
40 -3.0
175° C
30
-4.0
20
~ 1070 psi
-5.0 150° C
10
~ sat. vapour P
0 -6.0
100 150 200 250 300
3 1/T (1/K)
Temperature (C) Linear (
3)
15
Related Studies
NiO, VO, FeO, ZnO and CoO tested in packed-bed
reactor. Only FeO gives similar results
Free fatty acid tested in packed-bed reactor show 97 %
conversion in 7.5 minutes – conversion rate even faster
16
Water Tests
• Water present in cheap feedstock • Water formed during reaction with high
• 95% Ethanol with water considerably cheaper FFA content waste oil, animal tallow
80 0.3
70
0.24
60
Free acid content
Rate constant, k
50
0.18
Biodiesel conversion
(%)
40
Residence time = 5 min, + 200 mesh MnO 0.12
30
20
0.06
10
0 0
0 3 6 9 12 0 3 6 9 12
Water wt. % in ethanol Water wt. % in ethanol
Ethanol:Oil Ethanol:Oil
17 30:1 Molar ratio 30:1 Molar ratio
1.58:1 Mass ratio 1.58:1 Mass ratio
Alcohol
(Methanol)
Mixing
Process Simplification
Tank
Catalyst
(NaOH)
Methanol
Transesterfication
Recovery
Reaction
Product Water Product Adsorption
Separation Wash Drying Polishing
Various Glycerol
Free Fatty Acid
Oil Distillation
Pretreatment
Feedstock
High Quality Waste High Quality
Glycerol Water Biodiesel
18
Conventional Proposed
Process Process
Process Type Batch Continuous
Catalyst Life Very Short (consumed) Long
Conversion Time ~90 minutes 10~20 minutes
Catalyst, soap, water,
Impurities (ASTM) Glycerol, glycerides
glycerol, glycerides
Pretreatment of Free
Yes No
Fatty Acids
Catalyst Mixing Unit Yes No
Distillation of Glycerol Yes No
Washing & Wastewater Yes No
Product Drying Yes No
19
Acknowledgements
• Shaun Pardi
• Brian Dempsey
• Penn State Institutes of Energy and Environment
• Larry Duda and Ronald Danner
• Joe Perez and Wallis Lloyd
• CSPS Personnel – Adam Jones, Marc Russel, Ida
Balashova, Lourdes Serna, Roman Galdamez
• Chris Torres and Brian Plunkett
• Restek
20
Thank You!
Questions ?
Our Team: Dheeban Kannan, Kevin Gombotz, Frank Higdon and Jack Matson
Get documents about "