AIDS Prevention

Special Eurobarometer European Commission AIDS Prevention Fieldwork September to December 2005 Publication February 2006 Special Eurobarometer 240 / Wave 64.1 and 64.3 – TNS Opinion & Social This survey was requested by Directorate General SANCO and coordinated by Directorate General Press and Communication This document does not represent the point of view of the European Commission. The interpretations and opinions contained in it are solely those of the authors. SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” Tables of content INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................3 1. How can HIV be contracted? .....................................................................5 1.1. Overall results ......................................................................................5 1.2. Country comparisons .............................................................................8 1.2.1 Being injected with a needle which has been used by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive ........................................................................8 1.2.2 Receiving blood from someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive ........9 1.2.3 Having sex without protection with someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive ...................................................................................................9 1.2.4 Kissing on the mouth someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive ...... 10 1.2.5 Drinking from a glass which has just been used by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive .............................................................................. 11 1.2.6 Giving blood ................................................................................... 13 1.2.7 Sitting on a toilet seat which has been used by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive.................................................................................. 15 1.2.8 Taking care of someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive................ 16 1.2.9 Eating a meal prepared by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive ............................................................................................................ 18 1.2.10 Handling objects touched by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive ................................................................................................. 19 1.2.11 Shaking hands with someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive ...... 21 2. Have people changed their behaviour? ...................................................23 2.1. Overall results .................................................................................... 23 2.2. Country comparisons ........................................................................... 24 2.2.1 Taking precautions in sexual intercourse ............................................ 24 2.2.2 Seeking more stability in your choice of partners ................................. 25 2.2.3 Avoiding certain company\types of people .......................................... 26 2.2.4 Taking more care over the things you touch........................................ 27 2.2.5 Avoiding certain places (areas\establishments) ................................... 28 3. Efficiency of actual measures..................................................................30 3.1. Overall results .................................................................................... 30 3.2. Country comparisons ........................................................................... 31 3.2.1 Treating those who have AIDS and looking after them.......................... 31 3.2.2 An information campaign on the types of behaviour which expose people to infection by the AIDS virus ....................................................................... 33 -1- SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” 3.2.3 Treating those who are HIV positive to delay the onset of AIDS ............. 35 3.2.4 Funding research to find an AIDS vaccine ........................................... 37 3.2.5 Try harder to identify the people who are HIV positive or who have AIDS 39 4. Harmonisation of efforts within the European Union ..............................41 4.1. Overall results .................................................................................... 41 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................43 -2- SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” INTRODUCTION The HIV/AIDS epidemic has been a key focus for public health for the last twenty years. In recent years, concerns have been raised in the European Union about the threat of a new epidemic. The rate of new infections in some European countries is amongst the highest in the world. At the World Summit held at the United Nations in September 2005, leaders pledged to fully implement the Declaration of Commitment of HIV/AIDS adopted in 2001, by scaling up efforts for prevention, treatment, care and support so that every person, without exception, has access to these life-saving programmes. In Kofi Annan’s address on World Aids Day on 1 December 2005 he said that “It is a time to recognise that although our response so far has succeeded in some of the particulars, it has yet to match the epidemic in scale. It is a time to admit that if we are to reach the Millennium Development Goal of halting and beginning to reverse the spread of AIDS by 2015, then we must do far, far more. That mission concerns every one of us.” As one of the main elements to prevent the transmission of HIV is a general raise of awareness, it is therefore necessary to find out what people know about AIDS. The European Commission has already polled citizens from the old EU15 Member States in the past1 in order to measure public awareness on HIV and AIDS. The Directorate General SANCO wished to renew this poll it had commissioned in 2002. Compared to the survey which was conducted in 2002, the geographical coverage of this new study has been, by definition, enlarged to the 10 new Member States. In addition the survey has also been expanded to the acceding and candidate countries and the non government controlled areas of Cyprus. The questionnaire used in the 2005 wave was slightly modified. The fieldwork was conducted in two stages: between September 2nd and October 6th 2005 in the 25 Member States and between November 5th and December 7th 2005 in the acceding and candidate countries and the non government controlled areas of Cyprus. This should be taken into account when analysing the results. The methodology used is that of the Standard Eurobarometer polls from the Directorate-General Press and Communication (Unit “Opinion polls, press reviews, Europe Direct”). A technical note related to the conducting of the interviews by the institutes of the TNS Opinion & Social network is in annex of this report. This note details the interview techniques along with the confidence limits. The report aims to present the main results obtained during this poll. It analyses the overall results, the relevant socio-demographic characteristics and then consider the country by country level. Furthermore, it will present significant country evolutions for the old Member states of the European Union. 1 The study was conducted under the framework of the Eurobarometer (special Eurobarometer 183-2 / Wave 58.2) -3- SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” This report is divided into four parts: - The first part concerns the perception that citizens have about the ways people can catch HIV - The second part analyses whether people have changed their behaviour since the emergence and spread of AIDS - The third part deals with the efficiency of actual measures undertaken in the respondent’s countries - Finally, the fourth part concentrates on the attitudes of a harmonisation of efforts within the European Union -4- SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” 1. How can HIV be contracted? 1.1. Overall results - Europeans know how HIV can be contracted but some uncertainty emerges when it comes to ways in which the virus cannot be transmitted A list of statements was proposed to respondents and they were asked to indicate for each one whether or not it is a possible way of catching AIDS. The following chart presents the results at the aggregate level (EU25). We will present the most important country differences in the following section. Q1 In your opinion, can AIDS be caught by each of the follow ing w ays? No B ei ng inj ect ed wi t h a need le w hi ch has b een used b y so meo ne who has A I D S o r who i s HI V p o si t ive R ecei vi ng b l o o d f r o m so meo ne w ho has A I D S o r w ho i s HI V p o sit i ve Possibly Yes 94% 94% Havi ng sex wi t ho ut p r o t ect io n wi t h so meo ne who has A I D S o r w ho is HI V p o si t i ve 94% Ki ssi ng o n t he mo ut h so meo ne who has A I D S o r w ho i s HIV p o sit i ve 40% 30% 24% D r i nki ng f r o m a g l ass w hi ch has j ust b een used b y so meo ne who has A I D S o r w ho i s HI V p o si t ive 52% 27% 15% Gi vi ng b l o o d 54% 13% 30% Si t t i ng o n a t o i let seat w hi ch has b een used b y so meo ne w ho has A I D S o r w ho i s HI V p o si t ive 55% 26% 13% T aki ng car e o f so meo ne who has A I D S o r who i s HIV p o si t i ve 58% 25% 12% Eat i ng a meal p r ep ar ed b y so meo ne who has A I D S o r who i s HI V p o si t ive 70% 17% 7 Hand l i ng o b j ect s t o uched b y so meo ne who has A I D S o r who i s HI V p o si t ive 78% 13% 5 Shaki ng hand s wi t h so meo ne who has A ID S o r who i s HI V p o si t ive 83% 9% 5 When looking at the figures we can distinguish 4 categories of statements. -5- SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” The first category represents the ways you can actually contract HIV. It is reassuring to see that almost all EU citizens know that HIV can be contracted by “being injected with a needle which has been used by someone with AIDS or who is HIV positive”, “receiving blood from someone with AIDS or who is HIV positive” and by “having sex without protection with someone with AIDS or who is HIV positive”. Opinions are more split for all of the other items which are not ways of contracting HIV. The second category that we can distinguish in the results represents the statement for which less than half of the EU25 population knows the correct answer: 40% of citizens from the 25 Member States believe that HIV cannot be caught by “kissing on the mouth of someone with AIDS or who is HIV positive”. However, the population’s knowledge is quite low since 24% replied ‘yes’ and 30% answered ‘possibly’ to this statement. The third category represents the items for which awareness is still low but more balanced. Although, a majority of the interviewees think that “drinking from a glass which has just been used by someone with AIDS or who is HIV positive” is not a way to contract HIV (52%), 15% believe it is and 30% say it is possibly a way of catching the disease. We also notice a split opinion for “giving blood”: 54% of the EU25 citizens believe you cannot contract HIV this way. Yet 30% of respondents answer that this is a way to contract HIV and 13% replied that this action could ‘possibly’ lead to contracting the disease. A majority of the interviewees says that “sitting on a toilet seat which has been used by someone with AIDS or who is HIV positive” is not a way of contracting HIV (55%). However, this item also generates 26% of ‘possibly’ and 13% of ‘yes’ answers. When it comes to “taking care of someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive”, the population’s awareness is higher: almost six in ten respondents say it is not possible to catch the disease in this way. Nevertheless 25% of the interviewees answer that it is a possible way and 12% of them clearly state that it is a way of contracting HIV. The last category represents the final statements for which more than two thirds of respondents in the EU believe are not ways of contracting HIV. Seven out of ten European citizens think it is not possible to contract HIV by “eating a meal prepared by someone with AIDS or who is HIV positive”. Nevertheless, a non-negligible amount replied the opposite: 17% of them still state that it is possible and 7% of them are convinced of this. This is equally the case for “handling objects touched by someone with AIDS or who is HIV positive” and “shaking the hand of someone with AIDS or who is HIV positive” for which respectively 13% and 9% of interviewees answer ‘possibly’ and 5% answer ‘yes’. Analysis by socio-demographic characteristics Three findings are noteworthy. Firstly, one can note that the three items representing ways of contracting HIV are generally answered in the same way independent of the respondent’s socio-demographic profile. Only older people, aged 55 and more and those who finished their full-time education by the age of 15 or less, have slightly more difficulty in answering correctly. Secondly sex, age, education level, household size and urbanization are important variables in the way answers are given to the other statements of the list. The general tendency is: -6- SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” - there are no significant gender differences; the younger the respondent, the more likely the answer is to be correct; the higher the education level, the more likely the answer is to be correct; those living in a household of three or more people have a greater tendency to give the correct answer; those who are retired give the correct answer less often; citizens living in large towns seem to give the correct answer slightly more often than those living in rural areas However several exceptions can be found: Women answer ‘no’ less often for “sitting on a toilet seat” (52% compared to 57% for men) and slightly less women than men give the correct answer for “drinking from a glass” and “giving blood” Finally older people, aged 55 and more and those who finished their full-time education by the age of 15 or less, have slightly more difficulty in answering this question, as the non-response rate is systematically higher for these categories of the population. -7- SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” 1.2. Country comparisons In this subchapter we will tackle the observed country differences. We will also introduce the results from another identical survey that has been realised in both acceding and candidate countries as well as the non government controlled area of Cyprus. Finally, where necessary we will present the evolutions compared to a similar survey that has been realised in the old EU-15 in 2002. 1.2.1 Being injected with a needle which has been used by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive Almost all EU25 respondents seem to be well-informed about the risk of “being injected with a used needle by someone who has AIDS or is HIV positive”. With a result of 99%, Cypriots are the most aware of this danger. With the exception of Malta, all other countries obtained scores above the 90% mark. The Maltese results are noteworthy since only 89% of Maltese believe that this way can lead to contracting HIV. Furthermore, it is even more painful to note that 10% of them do not think it is a way of contracting HIV. As one can see, the perceptions of the Croatians and Romanians are quite close to that observed in the 25 Member States of the European Union. Being injected with a needle which has been used by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive Yes HR RO BG CY (tcc) TR 66% Possibly 92% 90% 85% 80% No DK 4% 6% 8% 8% 5% 6% 8% 10% 8% 16% On the contrary, a fraction of Bulgarians and members of the Turkish Cypriot community are more hesitant. The ‘DK’ percentage and the proportion of those who answered ‘possible’ to the question are somewhat higher than at the EU25 level. Furthermore, 5% of respondents of the Turkish Cypriot community do not think that “being injected with a used needle by someone who has AIDS or is HIV positive” is a way of contracting HIV. A consensus is not apparent in Turkey. Only 66% replied it is a way of contracting HIV. 16% of the Turkish population admit they do not know whereas 10% believe it is a possible way of contracting HIV. More frightening, 8% of the Turks do not think that “being injected with a used needle by someone who has AIDS or is HIV positive” is a way of contracting HIV. -8- SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” 1.2.2 Receiving blood from someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive We observe the same patterns for “receiving blood from someone who has AIDS or is HIV positive”. Again all of the Member States score above the 90% mark, with the exception of Malta. The proportion of those believing that this is a way of contracting HIV climbs even to 99% in Cyprus, Luxembourg and Sweden. We would like to draw attention to the fact that 9% of Maltese citizens do not recognise this statement as a way of contracting HIV. When looking at the results of the non-EU Member States opinions in Croatia and Romania are again quite close to the European average. Bulgarians and members of the Turkish Cypriot community are again somewhat more hesitant whereas the responses of the Turks are significantly different from other countries. Receiving blood from someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive Yes HR RO BG CY (tcc) TR Possibly 92% 92% 87% 86% 74% No DK 3% 7% 7% 5% 5% 4% 5% 4% 7% 14% It is important to note that 7% of Turkish respondents replied incorrectly and say that “receiving blood from someone who has AIDS or is HIV positive” is not a way of contracting HIV. Moreover, 14% of them declare that they do not know. 1.2.3 Having sex without protection with someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive In addition, the third statement of the list that represents a way of contracting HIV has been recognised by almost all EU respondents. The only exception is once more Malta for which 9% do not believe that “having sex without protection with someone who has AIDS or who is HIV” is a way of contracting HIV. Only 86% of the Maltese replied correctly. In all other countries the rates of correct answers attain the 90% mark or more. With 99%, the highest rate of correct answers is again found among Cypriots. The results in Croatia and the non government controlled area of Cyprus, Romania and Bulgaria are quite close to those obtained in the European Union. Only in Turkey is the amount of correct answers less pronounced. -9- SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” Having sex without protection with someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive Yes HR CY (tcc) RO BG TR Possibly 91% 91% 90% 89% 78% No DK 4% 6% 5% 5% 5% 4% 13% 1.2.4 Kissing on the mouth someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive Since “kissing on the mouth someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive” is not a way of catching AIDS, the question is only answered correctly by 40% of EU citizens. Kis s ing o n t he m o ut h s o m e o ne who ha s A ID S o r who is H IV po s it iv e No EU25 FR DK NL BE LU DE MT UK LV FI ES AT SE EE PL PT IE SI IT HU CZ EL LT CY SK 58% 53% 44% 43% 42% 42% 40% 39% 37% 36% 33% 32% 32% 31% 28% 26% 25% 25% 24% 21% 21% 20% 16% 40% Possibly 30% 69% 59% Yes 24% 15% 23% 19% 25% 24% 33% 32% 29% 32% 39% 23% 37% 42% 34% 28% 21% 29% DK 6% 12% 14% 20% 22% 4% 5% 7% 7% 6% 21% 12% 6% 8% 9% 8% 11% 4% 7% 35% 35% 4% 8% 4% 23% 25% 29% 25% 23% 35% 32% 41% 18% 20% 22% 22% 4% 4% 29% 35% 38% 36% 39% 27% 38% 39% 27% 39% 32% 44% 38% 47% - 10 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” Almost one in three are uncertain and replied that it is possibly a way of contracting HIV and one in four even clearly state that it is a way of catching the disease. As one can note, the country differences are significant. With a score over the 50% mark, four of the old EU-15 Member States rank highest in terms of correct answers: France, Denmark, the Netherlands and Belgium. Five more countries rank above the EU25 average of 40%. With less than one in four correct answers, three new Member States (Slovakia, Cyprus and the Czech Republic) as well as Greece are found at the bottom of the ranking. We should highlight here that almost half of the Slovakian respondents believe that “kissing on the mouth someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive” is a way of contracting HIV. The country ranking also depicts differences in opinion between the old EU-15 Member States and the 10 new Member States. With an average score of 43% of correct answers, the citizens of the EU15 are far better informed than the new Member State citizens (28%). The results in the non-EU Member States are at least evenly dispersed compared to the distribution observed in the 10 new Member States. The first important difference is the systematically higher proportion of respondents in these countries admitting they do not know the answer to the question. Another important finding shown in the figure below is the low rate of correct answers given by Bulgarians (12%). Kissing on the mouth someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive No CY (tcc) TR HR RO BG 12% 28% 27% 23% 23% 37% Possibly 27% 21% 27% 34% Yes 35% 31% 41% 25% 31% DK 10% 22% 9% 18% 19% Comparing the results of the 15 old Member States with an identical wave held two years ago, shows that the proportion of correct answers (no) is now significantly higher in France (+ 19 %points), Germany (+ 10% points), Belgium (+ 9% points) and Portugal (+ 6% points). The bad news is that the share of ‘yes’ answers has grown in Italy (+ 11 %points), Spain (+ 8 %points), Luxembourg (+ 7% points) and in the United Kingdom (+ 6 %points). 1.2.5 Drinking from a glass which has just been used by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive Opinions are more split when it comes to “drinking from a glass which has just been used by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive”. It is the first statement which does not represent a way of contracting HIV that secures a majority of correct answers. Unfortunately, the average of the new Member States decreases to 42% whereas the average in the EU15 is 54%. Furthermore, the following figure depicts that all new Member States score below the 50% mark whereas the 11 highest ranked countries are part of the old EU-15 and score above the 50% mark. - 11 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” If on average 27% replied that “drinking from a glass” is a possible way to contract HIV, this percentage is significantly higher in countries such as Cyprus (+ 15 %points), the Czech Republic (+ 12 %points), Austria and Italy (both + 10 %points). Furthermore, a non-negligible proportion of European citizens believe that they can contract HIV by “drinking from a glass that has just been used by someone who has AIDS or is HIV positive”. On average, 14% of citizens from the old EU-15 Member States believe this compared to 22% of citizens from the new Member States. The highest rates are observed in Slovakia (29%), Lithuania (28%) and Hungary (25%). D rink ing f ro m a gla s s whic h ha s jus t be e n us e d by s o m e o ne who ha s A ID S o r who is H IV po s it iv e No EU25 DK NL FR BE UK DE ES FI LU SE PT IE LV EE PL MT AT EL CZ IT SI HU LT SK CY 52% Possibly Yes 27% DK 15% 19% 19% 17% 22% 14% 14% 12% 11% 16% 12% 20% 11% 10% 11% 17% 17% 21% 19% 16% 16% 18% 21% 22% 25% 28% 29% 23% 4% 6% 9% 4% 10% 13% 5% 9% 9% 8% 6% 6% 4% 7% 5% 11% 6% 7% 4% 11% 5% 70% 67% 64% 63% 56% 55% 55% 54% 51% 51% 50% 48% 47% 46% 45% 43% 42% 41% 39% 39% 39% 37% 34% 33% 32% 29% 34% 42% 28% 31% 28% 25% 30% 36% 37% 39% 37% 36% 31% 26% 36% 31% 18% 33% 25% 29% When it comes to the acceding and candidate countries and the non government controlled areas of Cyprus, it should be noted that the share of respondents who do not know the answer is again higher than at the EU25 level. Almost one in two Turks replied correctly while not even one in three Bulgarians did so. - 12 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” D rink ing f ro m a gla s s whic h ha s jus t be e n us e d by s o m e o ne who ha s A ID S o r who is H IV po s it iv e No TR CY (tcc) HR RO BG 31% 48% 45% 44% 44% Possibly 17% 20% 24% 27% 33% Yes 12% 20% 22% 12% 16% DK 22% 14% 10% 17% 20% The comparative data for the EU15 shows significant evolutions once again. The correct answer ‘no’ has been replied more often than in the past in Portugal (+ 13 %points) and Germany (+ 7 %points) but considerably less often in Austria (- 11 %points), Luxembourg (- 9 %points), Sweden (- 8 %points), Italy and the United Kingdom (both - 6 %points) as well as Greece (- 5 %points). 1.2.6 Giving blood Since “giving blood”, is not a way of contracting HIV, the question is only answered correctly by 54% of EU citizens. The country differences are so high that one can observe a 73 point disparity between the percentages of correct answers in Sweden (89%), where seemingly citizens are quite well informed, and Slovakia (16%), for which seven out of ten citizens believe it is a way of catching the disease. Besides Swedes, citizens of three other countries, namely Denmark, Cyprus and Malta seem to be rather well informed. An evaluation of the share of correct answers in contrast to the EU25 average shows that of the 15 countries figuring above the average, we only find three new Member States (Cyprus, Malta and Hungary). Moreover, seven new Member States figure at the bottom of the ranking. Thus we observed a 27 point difference between the share of ‘no’ answers in the EU15 (58%) compared to the share of ‘no’ answers in the NMS10 (31%). Far more citizens in the NMS10 believe it is a way of contracting HIV (49%) than the EU15 citizens (26%) and this is certainly the case in Slovakia, Lithuania, Latvia, the Czech Republic and Poland where more than one out of two shares this view. Since differences between the EU15 and the NMS10 are so marked, it is interesting to have a look at the evolutions in the EU15 group. These evolutions are again nonnegligible in some of the countries. Compared to the past, more interviewees replied correctly by giving ‘no’ as an answer in Portugal (+ 20 %points), Austria (+ 7 %points), Greece (+ 7 %points), Ireland (+ 6 %points) and Denmark (+ 7 %points). On the contrary we observed fewer ‘no’ shares in Italy (- 13 %points), Spain (- 9 %points) and the United Kingdom (- 8 %points). - 13 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” G iv ing blo o d No EU25 SE DK CY MT EL NL BE PT FR FI IE IT AT ES HU UK DE LU SI CZ PL EE LT LV SK 34% 32% 26% 25% 17% 16% 16% 16% 24% 11% 54% Possibly 13% 89% 87% 86% 80% 68% 65% 64% 63% 62% 62% 59% 59% 59% 58% 55% 51% 50% 45% 19% 11% 20% 24% 11% 9% 16% Yes 30% DK 3% 6% 3% 7% 5% 6% 4% 9% 7% 4% 16% 8% 10% 18% 11% 14% 14% 15% 16% 10% 15% 12% 25% 25% 12% 26% 23% 17% 23% 22% 25% 26% 36% 31% 43% 45% 55% 50% 45% 63% 59% 71% 4% 6% 4% 7% 4% 4% 4% 10% 8% 4% Three of the non-EU countries score above the 50% mark. Even two of them (Turkey and the non government controlled area of Cyprus) score above the average of the EU Member States. It is only in Bulgaria that the share of ‘no’ answers is far lower than the share of ‘yes’ answers. Giving blood No TR CY (tcc) RO HR BG 16% 61% 57% 50% 41% 26% Possibly Yes 7% 11% 15% 14% 23% 22% 37% 48% DK 18% 9% 13% 11% 10% 11% - 14 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” 1.2.7 Sitting on a toilet seat which has been used by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive Respondents of the 25 Member States of the European Union are also in doubt when it comes to “sitting on a toilet seat which has been used by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive”. A majority (55%) knows it is not a way of contracting AIDS but on average 26% replied it could be a possible way and 13% believe it is a way of contracting AIDS. Country differences are again very marked. More than 50 points separate the Netherlands and Greece in terms of correct answers. S it t ing o n a t o ile t s e a t whic h ha s be e n us e d by s o m e o ne who ha s A ID S o r who is H IV po s it iv e No EU25 NL DK UK SE BE FI DE FR LU ES CZ EE IE AT LV SI MT PT PL HU CY LT IT SK EL 26% 25% 55% Possibly Yes 26% DK 13% 14% 17% 16% 22% 22% 26% 27% 7% 5% 6% 5% 5% 7% 7% 11% 7% 8% 12% 13% 13% 11% 13% 11% 11% 14% 16% 16% 13% 18% 19% 24% 20% 23% 29% 27% 13% 5% 5% 5% 13% 6% 10% 13% 6% 8% 4% 10% 10% 10% 6% 4% 5% 6% 77% 73% 73% 70% 67% 65% 61% 59% 58% 56% 52% 51% 51% 49% 48% 48% 45% 45% 42% 41% 37% 36% 35% 40% 42% 31% 37% 18% 31% 26% 25% 34% 30% 32% 29% 32% 29% 34% 35% 23% 26% The ten countries ranked above the average are the old EU-15 Member States. Of the twelve countries ranked lowest (also below the 50% mark), four are also old EU-15 Member States. The average share of correct answers in the EU15 and in the NMS10 is again significantly different (57% versus 42%). The new Member State citizens replied more often ‘possibly’ and ‘yes’ to this question. Around one in three respondents of the new Member States think it is possibly a way of contracting HIV (versus 25% for the EU15). At the same time, this is the case in Austria, Portugal and Italy, three of the old EU-15 Member States. The Slovaks and Greeks with 40% and 42% respectively express most uncertainty about the question. - 15 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” At the same time, with scores of 29% and 27%, both countries rank highest for the proportions thinking that it a way of contracting HIV. The ‘yes’ score reaches 18% in the NMS10 versus 12% for the EU15 and is the highest in Slovakia, Greece and Cyprus. Compared to the EU25 average, the share of correct answers is systematically lower in the acceding and candidate countries and the non government controlled areas of Cyprus. Besides this, we note that respondents in these countries have somewhat more difficulty in giving an answer to the question than respondents in the EU25. S it t ing o n a t o ile t s e a t whic h ha s be e n us e d by s o m e o ne who ha s A ID S o r who is H IV po s it iv e No HR TR RO CY (tcc) BG 29% 46% 44% 43% 42% Possibly 23% 16% 28% 18% 33% Yes 20% 17% 10% 26% 15% DK 11% 23% 19% 14% 23% Compared to the past, the significant evolutions of the share of ‘no’ answers for the old EU15 Member States are found in Portugal (+ 10 %points) and Germany (+ 8 %points). On the opposite, the share of ‘no’ answers decreased significantly in Italy (13 %points) and Sweden (- 5 %points). 1.2.8 Taking care of someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive When it comes to “taking care of someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive”, the population’s awareness is higher: almost six in ten respondents say it is not a possible way of catching the disease. Additionally, we should note here, that it is the only statement of those describing ways for which it is not possible to contract HIV, for which the NMS10 average share of correct answers is even as high as the EU15 average proportion of correct answers (57% and 58% respectively). Nevertheless the discrepancy between countries is still very high. Almost 40 points separate the ‘no’ score in Denmark (80%) from the ‘no’ score in Lithuania (41%). ‘Yes’ was replied more often in France, Italy and Latvia, resulting in a score that is at least 5 points higher than on average. Compared to the results of the past Eurobarometer in the EU15, the ‘yes’ has gained 16 points in Italy and 8 points in France. On the contrary, the share of correct answers progressed more than 5 points in Portugal whereas it has dropped significantly in Italy (- 22 %points), France and the United Kingdom (both - 7 %points) and Finland (- 5 %points). - 16 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” T a k ing c a re o f s o m e o ne who ha s A ID S o r who is H IV po s it iv e No EU25 DK NL SE FI ES MT LU UK DE SI PL IE CY PT HU BE AT CZ EL EE SK LV FR IT LT 58% Possibly Yes 25% DK 12% 12% 16% 17% 17% 12% 18% 27% 25% 27% 26% 10% 10% 4% 4% 6% 4% 6% 8% 7% 7% 7% 4% 6% 4% 8% 9% 10% 11% 11% 5% 10% 7% 6% 80% 77% 77% 75% 70% 66% 65% 64% 63% 63% 61% 58% 58% 56% 55% 54% 54% 53% 52% 49% 48% 45% 44% 42% 41% 27% 28% 30% 32% 32% 33% 31% 33% 33% 28% 32% 34% 25% 22% 32% 7% 16% 10% 5% 12% 10% 13% 16% 17% 26% 23% 16% 9% 4% 4% 5% 6% In the non-EU countries awareness is higher too. Two out of three citizens of Croatia and Turkey replied correctly, but only one in three has given the correct answer in Bulgaria. Again we should highlight that the percentage of those who admit that they cannot answer the question is higher compared to the EU25 average. Taking care of someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive No HR TR CY (tcc) RO BG 34% 47% 45% Possibly 66% 65% 23% 31% 31% Yes 13% 7% 7% 17% 9% 16% 13% DK 9% 20% 13% 15% 18% - 17 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” 1.2.9 Eating a meal prepared by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive “Eating a meal prepared by someone who has AIDS or is HIV positive” is answered correctly by 70% of the citizens of the 25 Member States of the European Union. Although a majority of the new Member State citizens recognise that this is not a way of catching AIDS (58%) fewer give the right answer compared to their fellow citizens in the EU15 group (73%). The country ranking clearly depicts that Malta is the only new Member State above the average. The answers given by Greeks, Austrians and Italians are noteworthy. Citizens of these three countries rank their country below the European average, as did citizens of the nine other new Member States. E a t ing a m e a l pre pa re d by s o m e o ne who ha s A ID S o r who is H IV po s it iv e No EU25 SE DK LU NL FR BE FI UK DE MT ES PT IE EL CY AT EE PL SK CZ IT LV SI HU LT 39% Possibly 70% 88% 85% 83% 83% 80% 78% 78% 76% 74% 73% 72% 72% 71% 67% 65% 64% 60% 60% 60% 58% 58% 58% 57% 52% 32% Yes 17% DK 7% 6% 9% 4% 8% 9% 12% 11% 17% 17% 14% 18% 13% 10% 18% 13% 21% 21% 20% 21% 19% 24% 29% 26% 26% 30% 29% 18% 11% 4% 8% 7% 4% 4% 5% 4% 6% 4% 5% 7% 11% 7% 12% 6% 6% 10% 5% 10% 9% 12% 13% 8% 4% 12% 11% 9% 4% 6% 4% 8% 10% 6% 9% 9% 5% Thus one can observe a 49 point difference between the percentage of correct answers in Sweden, where seemingly citizens are again best informed, and Lithuanians, who are the most divided about the question. For 18% of them, eating a meal prepared by someone who is HIV positive is a way of catching AIDS. On average, this incorrect answer has been given by 11% of the new Member State citizens whereas it is only replied by 6% of the old EU15 Member State citizens. - 18 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” The awareness of Croatians is as high as the awareness of EU citizens. The proportions of correct answers in the other non-EU member countries are also encouraging since all of them are above the 50% mark whereas this was not the case for Lithuania. Once more, we should note that citizens from the acceding and candidate countries and the non government controlled areas of Cyprus admit more than EU25 citizens that they do not know. E a t ing a m e a l pre pa re d by s o m e o ne who ha s A ID S o r who is H IV po s it iv e No HR CY (tcc) TR RO BG 51% Possibly 71% 66% 62% 61% Yes 11% 9% 6% 10% 18% 22% 7% 5% 12% 8% DK 10% 13% 22% 16% 20% In addition it is worth highlighting evolutions compared to the past. The significant growth of the share of ‘no’ answers for the old EU15 group is found in Portugal (+ 11 %points). It seems that globally, for this question, opinions progress more negatively: the share of ‘no’ answers decreased significantly in Italy (- 18 %points), Austria (- 14 %points), Spain (- 10 %points), the United Kingdom (- 7 %points), Denmark (- 6 %points) Finland and Sweden (both - 5 %points). 1.2.10 Handling objects touched by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive The disparity between the country results is less pronounced but significant for “handling objects touched by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive”. Again the Swedes top the rank with 92% of them giving the right answer. The lowest rates of correct answers are found among Slovaks and Lithuanians. However, with a score of 60%, a majority of them replied correctly. On average, the percentage of correct answers in the new Member States (71%) is somewhat lower than in the old Member States (79%). Only one new Member State, namely Cyprus, scores better than the overall European average. All other new Member States, together with Portugal, Ireland, Austria and Italy are below the European average. 12% of Slovaks and Italians believe that handling objects touched by someone who has AIDS or is HIV positive is a way of contracting HIV. Compared to the previous wave the ‘yes’ increases by 8 points in Italy. The ‘no’ on the contrary plunged by 15 points. The proportion of correct answers also dropped in a non-negligible way in Austria (- 10 %points), the United Kingdom (- 6 %points) and Luxembourg (- 5 %points). - 19 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” H a ndling o bje c t s t o uc he d by s o m e o ne who ha s A ID S o r who is H IV po s it iv e No EU25 SE NL DK LU FI UK BE DE CY ES EL FR PT IE MT AT PL CZ SI EE HU LV IT LT SK Possibly 78% 92% 91% 88% 85% 85% 83% 82% 82% 81% 80% 79% 79% 76% 75% 73% 73% 73% 72% 72% 71% 69% 67% 64% 60% 60% Yes 13% DK 5% 4% 6% 6% 7% 7% 11% 10% 12% 11% 11% 6% 6% 12% 12% 14% 11% 13% 17% 14% 19% 18% 16% 19% 20% 21% 4% 8% 8% 5% 6% 4% 5% 8% 4% 4% 5% 4% 6% 10% 6% 6% 8% 6% 6% 6% 5% 8% 12% 11% 12% 9% 6% 6% 4% 7% 6% 21% 24% The share of correct answers is also over the 50% mark in the acceding and candidate countries and the non government controlled areas of Cyprus. H a ndling o bje c t s t o uc he d by s o m e o ne who ha s A ID S o r who is H IV po s it iv e No HR CY (tcc) RO TR BG Possibly 72% 67% 63% 62% 59% Yes 12% 9% 17% 9% 17% 8% 7% 11% 4% DK 7% 9% 13% 16% 21% 17% We repeat here once again, that significantly more citizens in these countries replied that they do not know the answer. - 20 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” 1.2.11 Shaking hands with someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive With an average of 83% of correct answers among the EU25 countries, “shaking hands with someone who has AIDS or is HIV positive” secures the highest consensus out of the statements dealing with ways for which it is not possible to catch AIDS. However the country differences are still significant. Slovakia and Lithuania are the only two countries in which the percentage of correct answers lies below the 70% mark. In both countries two in ten believe that “shaking hands with someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive” could possibly lead to contracting HIV. One in ten is even convinced that it is a way of catching AIDS. This is also the case in Italy and Portugal. Also in Malta and Spain a non-negligible proportion of the population (respectively 9% and 8%) states that it is a way of contracting HIV. S ha k ing ha nds wit h s o m e o ne who ha s A ID S o r who is H IV po s it iv e No EU25 NL FR SE DK BE LU UK FI DE CY ES CZ PL MT IE LV AT SI EE EL PT HU IT LT SK Possibly 83% 96% 93% 93% 92% 91% 91% 90% 86% 85% 85% 81% 80% 80% 79% 77% 77% 77% 77% 76% 76% 74% 73% 71% 63% 62% Oui / Yes NSP / DK 9% 5% 5% 4% 7% 5% 5% 9% 9% 10% 4% 8% 13% 10% 8% 12% 13% 14% 16% 13% 14% 11% 17% 17% 20% 23% 10% 9% 7% 5% 5% 4% 5% 5% 4% 7% 6% 4% 4% 5% 5% 5% 6% 6% 4% 10% 6% 6% 5% 10% 7% 4% 11% With the exception of Italy, Portugal, Greece, Austria and Ireland, all of the other old EU15 Member States obtained a percentage of correct answers above the 80% mark. On average, 84% of citizens from the old EU15 group replied correctly versus 77% for the new Member States. - 21 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” Comparative data analyses shows us that the amount of ‘no’ has increased in Belgium and France (respectively + 6 % points and + 5 % points) but on the contrary has decreased in Italy (- 14 %points), Spain and Greece (both - 5 %points). With the exception of the higher ‘do not know’ rate’, opinions are similar in the non-EU member countries. Shaking hands with someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive No HR CY (tcc) RO TR BG Possibly 79% 70% 66% 66% 58% Yes 6% 12% 13% 7% 17% 9% 10% DK 8% 6% 9% 14% 18% 15% 10% 7% - 22 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” 2. Have people changed their behaviour? 2.1. Overall results As we have seen in the first part of this report, the level of knowledge of the ways one can catch HIV is relatively high. However a certain level of uncertainty (answer ‘possibly’) exists. It could perhaps be that these responses do not only reflect the knowledge of the subject but also indicate that a certain fear of AIDS is present. It is thus very interesting to analyse whether people have changed their behaviour since the emergence and spread of AIDS. Q2 Have the em ergence and the spread of AIDS led you personally …? No t a k ing pre c a ut io ns in s e xua l int e rc o urs e s e e k ing m o re s t a bilit y in yo ur c ho ic e o f pa rt ne rs a v o iding c e rt a in c o m pa ny\ t ype s o f pe o ple t a k ing m o re c a re o v e r t he t hings yo u t o uc h a v o iding c e rt a in pla c e s ( a re a s \ e s t a blis hm e nt s ) Yes 48% 38% 17% 14% 14% 41% 48% 71% 73% 75% Almost a majority of EU citizens says they are “taking precautions in sexual intercourse” as a consequence of the emergence and spread of AIDS. Four in ten interviewees replied that they are “seeking more stability in their choice of partners”. Unfortunately almost half of the EU25 citizens affirm that they do not seek more stability in their choice of partners. This finding needs further investigation. At the same time a large majority say that they do not try to avoid certain company, take more care over the things they touch or avoid certain places. Analysis by socio-demographic characteristics The above findings should be analysed in terms of respondents’ socio-demographic characteristics. Surprisingly, the socio-demographic analysis does not reveal great differences for “avoiding certain company”, “taking more care over things you touch” and “avoiding certain places”. On the contrary, we can notice different answer patterns in terms of profiles when it comes to “taking precautions in sexual intercourse” and “seeking more stability in your choice of partners”. Firstly, more men than women say they take precautions in sexual intercourse (51% versus 45%). Age is predictably a very important variable too: 71% of those aged 15 - 23 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” to 24 admit that they take precautions whereas only 30% of those aged 55 and more do so. The education level also seems to highlight such differences. While 35% of those who ended their full time education by the age of 15 admit that they take more precautions, 53% of those who studied until the age of 20 or more do so. This proportion climbs to 70% for those who are still studying. Of course far less of those who are retired say so (30%). Furthermore, more citizens living in large towns than those living in rural villages take more precautions during sexual intercourse (53% versus 43%). The findings are slightly different regarding “seeking more stability in the choice of patterns”. No gender differences are observed but age and education bear a strong influence. With a result of 27% older respondents (aged 55 and more) reply less often that they do so and answer more often that they do not (58%). Seemingly not everybody in this age band is concerned since 10% of them replied that they do not know. There is a strong link between older respondents, the retired and those who completed their full time education by the age of 15 or less, judging by the fact that the results are more or less similar for these socio-demographic profiles. Again more citizens living in large towns (40%) say that they seek more stability in their choice of partners than those living in rural areas (35%). 2.2. Country comparisons 2.2.1 Taking precautions in sexual intercourse At the country level, we should note that in 13 countries over half of the respondents reply that they take more precautions during sexual intercourse. Cypriots and Austrians top the ranks with a result of 66% and just half of the Slovaks do so. On the contrary, only one in three Lithuanians states that they do. Take precautions in sexual intercourse Yes 66% 66%63%63%63% 48% No 6 0 % 6 0 % 57% 56 % 53 % 52 % 51% 50 % 4 9 % 4 6 % 4 5% 4 3 % 4 3 % 4 2 % 4 2 % 4 1% 4 0 % 3 8 % 3 8 % 34% 4 1% 23% 2 4 % 2 1% 2 8 % 2 4 % 2 5% 29%33% 30% 38% 44% 38% 3 1% 40% 43% 48% 44% 3 7% 48% 29% 3 7% 4 8 % 4 5% 53 % 4 6 % EU25 CY AT EL LU MT CZ HU SE EE BE FR IT SK FI UK ES DE PL DK PT IE SI LV NL LT With an average score of 48% in the EU15 and in the NMS10 the results are identical on the ‘yes’ side. However, somewhat more citizens of the EU15 group replied that they do not take more precautions in sexual intercourse (42% versus 34% in the NMS10). When it comes to the acceding and candidate countries and the non government controlled areas of Cyprus, one can note that the results are more or less in line with - 24 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” the observations made at the EU25 level. The members of the Turkish Cypriot Community top the ranks with 55% of them stating they take more precautions during sexual intercourse. On the contrary, only 37% of Turks reply that they do so. Take precautions in sexual intercourse Yes No 55% 52 % 42% 38% 3 7% 30% 24% 42% 4 5% 38% CY (tcc) RO BG HR TR 2.2.2 Seeking more stability in your choice of partners The country differences are even higher when it comes to “seeking more stability in the choice of partners”. One can observe a 51 point difference between Lithuanians, who seem to have drastically changed their behaviour in terms of stability of partners since the emergence of AIDS, and the Dutch. Only two in ten of them seek more stability in their choice of partners. Moreover seven out of ten of them reply that they did not change their behaviour. Seek m ore stability in your choice of partners Yes 71% 6 5% 6 4 % 6 3 % No 38% 56 % 54 % 53 % 50 % 4 7% 4 7% 4 5% 4 1% 3 9 % 3 9 % 3 7% 3 6 % 3 6 % 32% 3 1% 2 9 % 2 8 % 2 8 % 2 7% 2 7% 20% 19 % 2 4 % 2 2 % 2 5% 2 6 % 2 3 % 28% 48% 33% 3 8 % 3 9 % 3 5% 3 8 % 50 % 4 8 % 4 9 % 50 % 50 % 38% 58 % 52 % 4 7% 60%60% 58 % 68% EU25 HU CY EL MT AT SK EE CZ IT SI PL LT LU FI DE BE SE PT ES LV DK FR IE UK NL If more than half of the respondents in eight countries of the EU25 say they seek more stability in their choice of partners, the situation is different in the non-EU countries. In all of them less than half of the respondents replied that they do so. We should however bear in mind that the proportion of those saying that they have changed their behaviour in terms of partner stability is at least as low in some Western countries. - 25 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” Seek m ore stability in your choice of partners Yes No 43% 40% 3 5% 33% 23% 29% 4 1% 48% 48% 46% RO CY (tcc) BG HR TR Further investigation would be necessary in order to detect if AIDS became part of everyday life in some EU15 Member States, but less so in the NMS10 countries. The average results give an initial indication: 35% of EU15 citizens reply that they do seek more stability in their choice of partners whereas 30% do so in the NMS10. However, at the same time the proportion of those replying that they did not is far higher in the EU15 (51%) than in the NMS10 (32%). 2.2.3 Avoiding certain company\types of people Respondents were also asked if they avoid certain types of people since the emergence of AIDS. Once again, the variation between the countries covered is notable. The lowest levels admitting a change in behaviour are found among citizens of the 12 old EU Member States. In the Netherlands seemingly nobody avoids certain company. Avoiding certain com pany\types of people Yes No 42%39% 39%38% 3 7% 17% 3 0 % 2 6 % 2 5% 2 5% 2 1% 2 0 % 19 % 19 % 18 % 14 % 14 % 14 % 14 % 10 % 9 % 9 % 8 % 7% 7% 2% 4 3 % 4 7% 4 2 % 4 4 % 4 2 % 71% 53 % 6 1% 6 1% 55% 63% 73 % 63%63% 58 % 73 % 75% 63% 75% 79 % 8 4 % 8 2 % 8 7% 8 5% 8 7% 96% EU25 MT CY SK CZ EE IT PL EL AT HU LU LV LT PT DE ES IE FI SI BE UK FR DK SE NL On the contrary five NMS10 countries top the ranking. With 42%, more Maltese changed their behaviour compared to any other Member State nationality. That said it is therefore not surprising that the average results in the EU15 differ significantly from - 26 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” those in the NMS10. While only 15% of the EU15 citizens reply that they avoid certain company, 28% of the NMS10 citizens admit that they do so. Furthermore, 74% of the EU15 citizens do not avoid certain company while this share drops to 58% in the NMS10. Members of the Turkish Cypriot community and Romanians have more or less changed their attitude in the same way as citizens of the NMS10 group. We should however note that fewer replied that they do not avoid certain company. Avoiding certain com pany\ types of people Yes No 3 1% 2 5% 19 % 18 % 18 % 4 7% 4 7% 66% 6 1% 48% CY (tcc) RO HR BG TR Croatians, Bulgarians and Turks are on the contrary closer to the average of the EU15 citizens in terms of avoiding certain types of people. However, compared to the EU15 average, fewer replied that they did not change their behaviour which means that they display a certain hesitation here. 2.2.4 Taking more care over the things you touch The tendencies are more are less identical for “taking more care over the things touched”. Taking m ore care over the things you touch Yes No 4 1% 32%29% 14 % 2 5% 2 3 % 2 3 % 2 2 % 2 1% 19 % 19 % 16 % 16 % 15% 14 % 13 % 12 % 11% 11% 11% 10 % 9 % 9 % 8 % 8 % 6 % 43%46% 57% 55% 56 % 73 % 6 5% 60% 6 8 % 73 % 62% 6 7% 6 9 % 6 1% 72 % 78 % 77% 78 % 6 9 % 73 % 75% 8 4 % 8 6 % 8 5% 8 4 % 89% EU25 MT EE CY SK IT PL CZ EL LU AT LV HU PT LT BE UK ES IE SI DE FR NL DK FI SE Again, with 41% of Maltese citizens saying that they take more care over the things they touch, they rank highest. In the ranking, they are followed by three other NMS - 27 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” countries, namely Estonia, Cyprus and Slovakia. At the bottom of the ranking, 11 of the old EU15 Member States, starting with 13% of Belgians affirm that they take more care over the things they touch to 6% of Swedes. The difference between the EU15 average and the NMS10 average is however somewhat less pronounced than for “avoiding certain types of people”. Only an 8 point gap separates the ‘yes’ in the EU15 from the ‘yes’ in the NMS10 for “taking more care over the things you touch” (13% in EU15 compared to 21% in NMS10). On the ‘no’ side a 10 point difference can be observed (74% in EU15 and 64% in NMS10). Taking m ore care over the things you touch Yes No 33% 22% 19 % 14 % 14 % 50 % 51% 63% 72 % 59 % CY (tcc) RO BG HR TR The results of the acceding and candidate countries and the non government controlled areas of Cyprus regarding “taking more care over the things one touch” are also similar to what has been observed for “avoiding certain types of company”. 2.2.5 Avoiding certain places (areas\establishments) Lastly, respondents were also asked if they avoid certain places, now that AIDS has been spread. This action is again only undertaken by a minority of the respondents. However, almost one in three Estonians, Slovaks and Maltese replied that they do so. Once again, 12 of the old EU15 Member States figure at the bottom of the ranking. The variations in the average of the EU15 and the NMS10 are similar to before: 13% of ‘yes’ and 77% of ‘no’ at the EU15 level and 22% of ‘yes’ and 64% of ‘no’ at the NMS10 level. - 28 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” Avoiding certain places (areas\establishm ents) Yes No 30%30%29% 14 % 24%24%23%23%22%22% 19 % 19 % 16 % 14 % 14 % 13 % 12 % 11% 10 % 9 % 9 % 8 % 8 % 7% 4% 2% 4 7% 4 9 % 75% 58 % 6 2 % 6 0 % 6 2 % 58 % 6 5% 6 7% 69% 70 % 74 % 6 6 % 72 % 6 6 % 77% 76 % 8 3 % 8 6 % 8 2 % 8 5% 8 3 % 88%86% 9 7% EU25 EE SK MT IT HU CZ AT CY PL EL LU LT LV PT ES DE IE BE FR FI DK UK SE SI NL The findings among the non-EU Member States regarding “avoiding certain places” are more are less in line with what respondents replied for “taking more care over the things they touch”. Avoiding certain places (areas\ establishm ents) Yes No 34% 19 % 14 % 14 % 12 % 50% 53% 69% 59% 76% CY (tcc) RO BG TR HR - 29 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” 3. Efficiency of actual measures 3.1. Overall results There is no doubt that a certain level of fear regarding AIDS exists. Individuals have indeed changed their behaviour since the emergence and the spread of AIDS. Let us now see what they think about the effectiveness of measures undertaken in their country. The percentages indicated below represent the sum of ‘very effective’ and ‘fairly effective’ answers. Q3 For each of these options, do you feel that the m easures currently being undertaken in (OUR COUNTRY) are very effective, fairly effective, not very effective or not at all effective? Treating those who has AIDS and looking after them An information campaign on the types of behaviour which expose people to infection by the AIDS virus Treating those who are HIV positive to delay the onset of AIDS Funding research to find an AIDS vaccine Try harder to identify the people who are HIV positive or who have AIDS 68% 67% 67% 60% 54% Three measures rank at similar levels of effectiveness within the EU: almost 7 out of 10 citizens believe that “Treating those who have AIDS and looking after them” is the most effective measure undertaken in their respective countries (68%). About the same proportion refers to information campaigns on the types of hazardous behaviour that expose people to AIDS, as well as to “treating those who are HIV positive to delay the onset” of the disease. Scoring slightly below, at 60%, interviewees mentioned the financial aid dedicated to research (“funding research to find an AIDS vaccine) while 54% state “try harder to identify the people who are HIV positive or who have AIDS”. - 30 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” 3.2. Country comparisons 3.2.1 Treating those who have AIDS and looking after them A country analysis of the results shows some differences in the way citizens perceive the effectiveness of medical treatment and care of those with AIDS. Ten countries, mainly the old EU15 Member States rank above the EU25 average, with around 8 out of 10 citizens emphasizing the value of these treatments. The highest scores are found in Belgium (83%), the Netherlands (83%), Sweden (82%) and Italy (82%). Among the new Member States, only Malta integrates this group of countries, scoring at a similar level to Spain (75% and 76%). Treating those w ho has AIDS and looking after them , % Effective 68% 8 3 % 8 3 % 8 2 % 8 2 % 8 1% 79 % 78 % 77% 76 % 75% 73 % 6 7% 6 3 % 6 3 % 6 2 % 6 1% 57% 55% 54 % 51% 51% 50 % 38% 2 6 % 2 5% EU25 BE NL IT SE FI FR LU DK ES MT AT DE SI SK UK CZ CY LT PT IE HU EL PL EE LV Results are in line with the European average in Austria (73%) and Germany (67%), followed by a group of 10 countries with results that ranks from 63% obtained in Slovenia to 50% in Greece. The situation in three new Member States looks more critical as far as this measure is concerned: only 38% of respondents in Poland, 26% in Estonia and 25% in Latvia highlight the importance and effectiveness of treating those who have AIDS and looking after them in their respective countries. These results should be monitored as it could be reflecting either a failure in the national AIDS action plan or insufficient communication/information from responsible institutions towards society. In fact, 43% in Poland, 50% in Latvia and 54% in Estonia criticize the effectiveness of this measure in their country. - 31 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” A country analysis of the shifts in the percentages since the previous survey shows the following developments: Positive evolutions are significant in Luxembourg (+17 % points), Portugal, Belgium (+8 % points) as well as Italy and Denmark (+6 % points). Austria, the United Kingdom and Ireland are the countries displaying the most negative trend with regard to the treatment of those affected by AIDS (-6, -7 and -10 % points respectively). If we look at the results obtained in the acceding and candidate countries, we can observe that scores in Romania and Croatia are similar to the EU25 average (75% and 73% in that order) while the situation in Turkey and the Turkish Cypriot community is similar to that already observed in Poland, Estonia and Latvia (with 35% and 27% respectively). Treating those w ho has AIDS and looking after them , % Effective 75% 73 % 4 7% 3 5% 2 7% RO HR BG CY (tcc) TR - 32 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” 3.2.2 An information campaign on the types of behaviour which expose people to infection by the AIDS virus As far as the effectiveness of information campaigns focusing on risky behaviour, the country analysis shows that in almost all countries a majority or a relative majority believes that this measure is or has been effective in their respective countries. Yet, the levels attained vary from one country to another: the largest proportion of people appreciating the value of national information campaigns is found in Italy (with 83% stating so) with the Netherlands and Finland showing similar results (78% and 76%). From this level, scores go down to 47% for Estonia and Hungary. An inform ation cam paign on the types of behaviour w hich expose people to infection by the AIDS virus, % Effective 83% 6 7% 78 % 76 % 74 % 72 % 71% 70 % 6 9 % 6 8 % 6 7% 6 7% 6 5% 6 4 % 6 3 % 59 % 58 % 57% 57% 56 % 54 % 52 % 51% 4 7% 4 7% 40% EU25 IT NL FI AT FR BE ES DE SI CZ MT DK SE LU CY PT LT UK SK EL PL IE EE HU LV Latvia displays the worse results with only 40% of respondents declaring that these types of information campaigns are an effective measure in their country. Apart from Latvia, where critics attain 45%, negative results are significant as well in Greece (41%), Estonia (39%), Hungary (38%) and Poland (36%). A comparative analysis with the previous survey reveals major evolutions in Italy (+13 % points) and Portugal, and to a lesser extent in France (+7 %points), Greece (+4 % points) and Belgium (+3 % points). In contrast, the most negative trend is found in Spain (-8 % points), Sweden (-5 % points) and Ireland (-5 % points). - 33 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” Moving on to the acceding and candidates countries one can observe, as per the previous measure, that in Romania and Croatia the positive answers rank at the same level as most of the EU25 countries with 77% and 72% respectively declaring that national information campaigns about types of behaviour which exposes people to AIDS are effective. To a lesser extent, this is also the opinion of a majority of interviewees in Bulgaria (58%), while, once more, citizens in Turkey and in the Turkish Cypriot community are far less positive (30% and 35% in that order). An inform ation cam paign on the types of behaviour w hich expose people to infection by the AIDS virus, % Effective 77% 72 % 58 % 3 5% 30% RO HR BG CY (tcc) TR - 34 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” 3.2.3 Treating those who are HIV positive to delay the onset of AIDS Treatments aiming to delay the onset of AIDS in those who are HIV positive are seen as being a positive measure in almost all the Member States. Yet, the level of support for this opinion varies significantly from one country to the other. The most enthusiastic are, once more, the Dutch and the Italians (84% and 83% respectively), while positive answers are far fewer in 4 new Member States such as Hungary, Poland, Latvia and Estonia, where it decreases to 47%, 37%, 28% and 24% in that order. Treating those w ho are HIV positive to delay the onset of AIDS, % Effective 8 4 % 8 3 %8 2 % 8 2 % 6 7% 8 0 % 79 % 77% 75% 72 % 6 9 %6 9 % 6 4 %6 3 % 6 3 % 58 % 57% 57% 55% 54 % 50 % 4 9 % 4 7% 3 7% 28% 24% EU25 NL IT BE SE DK FR FI LU AT DE MT SK ES UK SI CZ CY LT PT IE EL HU PL LV EE Analysing the countries’ shift in the figures since the previous survey we observe that a favourable perception of the effectiveness of these specific treatments progress in Luxembourg (+16 points), Portugal and the Netherlands (+10 points in both countries) as well as Italy, Belgium and Germany (+9 points for the first two countries and +8 in Germany). One should note that in Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Belgium and Italy, the evolutions were already extremely positive as far as general treatment and care of persons with AIDS was concerned. In contrast, positive opinions in Austria and Ireland have decreased significantly since the last wave (-6 and -8 % points respectively). - 35 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” The results obtained in the acceding and candidates countries are consistent with what has been analysed up to this point: the percentage of citizens stating that these treatments are an effective measure in Romania and Croatia attain a similar level as in the Member States while the situation seems to be more critical in Turkey as well as in the non government controlled areas of Cyprus: 45% and 53% state that measures undertaken in this direction is not effective in their country. Treating those w ho are HIV positive to delay the onset of AIDS, % Effective 75% 72 % 46% 30% 28% RO HR BG CY (tcc) TR - 36 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” 3.2.4 Funding research to find an AIDS vaccine The evaluation of the effectiveness of the current funding research policies varies considerably from one country to another but once more positive and negative trends are observed in the same countries: Italy and the Netherlands rank at the top of the hierarchy with 80% and 78% of citizens asserting that their national funding policies, as far as research on AIDS is concerned, are effective. Funding research to find an AIDS vaccine, % Effective 8 0 % 78 % 60% 73 % 70 % 6 9 %6 9 % 6 9 % 6 5% 6 3 % 59 % 58 % 55% 54 % 52 % 49%49%49% 4 7% 4 5% 4 1% 3 9 % 36% 33% 2 0 % 19 % EU25 IT NL LU BE ES AT SE DK FR SK DE FI CZ UK CY LT MT HU PT IE EL SI PL EE LV Levels of support decrease below the 50% level in Portugal, Ireland, Greece and Slovenia and are especially low in Poland (33%), Estonia (20%) and Latvia (19%). In these countries a majority or a relative majority of citizens have the opposite opinion: 54% of Estonians believe this measure it not effective, followed by 50% of Latvians and 44% of Poles. In the old EU15 Member States, negative attitudes are significant in Greece with 41% of respondents criticizing the effectiveness of their country’s policy in terms of AIDS research funding. A country analysis on the shifts in the results since the previous survey shows the following developments: Perception of effectiveness increases greatly in Luxembourg (+16 % points), and registers significant progressions in Italy (+8 % points). At the same time, disapproval ratings increase in France (+7 % points), Greece (+7 % points) Ireland (+6 % points) and Austria (+6 % points). - 37 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” In the non Member States opinions are once more much more favourable in Romania and Croatia (72% and 63%) whereas Turkish and the members of the Turkish Cypriot community are far more negative when evaluating the usefulness of this measure in their country. Funding research to find an AIDS vaccine, % Effective 72 % 63% 4 1% 36% 28% RO HR BG CY (tcc) TR - 38 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” 3.2.5 Try harder to identify the people who are HIV positive or who have AIDS One out of two citizens within the European Union believes that trying harder to identify people who are HIV positive or who have AIDS is effective. Percentages vary from 76% in Finland to 32% in Latvia. Globally, this measure is judged as being effective by 50% or more of respondents in 16 Member States, including those in the old EU15 group like Italy (67%), Austria (64%), Sweden or the Netherlands (61% and 60% respectively), as well as new Member States like Malta (59%), the Czech Republic (57%) or Lithuania (55%). At the opposite end of the ranking, with the lowest level of positive answers, we find Poland (40%), Estonia (34%) and Latvia (32%). The responses obtained in this dimension confirm negative perceptions. These three countries seem to convey general criticism towards the overall treatment of the AIDS issue in their country. Try harder to identify the people w ho are HIV positive or w ho have AIDS, % Effective 76 % 54 % 6 7% 6 4 % 6 1% 6 0 % 59 % 57% 55% 55% 55% 55% 54 % 54 % 52 % 52 % 50 % 4 9 % 4 8 % 4 7% 4 6 % 42% 40% 34%32% EU25 FI IT AT SE NL MT CZ FR LT SI SK BE ES DE CY LU PT HU EL DK IE PL EE LV The evolutions, as far as the former wave is concerned, presents a remarkable increase in the percentage of Italians believing in the effectiveness of the identification of those who are HIV positive or have AIDS (+28 % points). The progress of this opinion is significant as well in Luxembourg (+10 % points), Portugal or Finland (+8 and +9 % points respectively). Yet this perception seems to be weaker in Ireland compared to 3 years ago as favourable judgements drop 8 % points and, at the same time, negative opinion increases 10 % points (attaining now 35% of the population). - 39 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” Moving on to the acceding and candidate countries, the same trend persists: Romanians and Croatians are far more optimistic with regard to the effectiveness of this measure in their country while Bulgarians have a more tepid opinion and Turks and members of the Turkish Cypriot community perceive it negatively. Try harder to identify the people w ho are HIV positive or w ho have AIDS, % Effective 74 % 60% 46% 33% 2 7% RO HR BG CY (tcc) TR - 40 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” 4. Harmonisation of efforts within the European Union 4.1. Overall results Respondents were confronted with the same list of measures and in each case were asked whether or not it is useful to collaborate and harmonise efforts within the European Union. The level of support for further collaboration and harmonisation of efforts within the European Union is overwhelming: around 9 out of 10 citizens support this principle when it comes to “Funding research to find an AIDS vaccine”, “Treating those who have AIDS and looking after them”, information campaigns on risky behaviours and treatments aiming to delay the onset of the illness in HIV positive persons. 8 out of 10 support this idea as far as the identification of people who are HIV positive or who have AIDS. Q4 Let us look at this sam e list of possible m easures. For each of them do you think it is useful or not to collaborate and to harm onise efforts w ithin the European Union? Funding research to find an AIDS vaccine Treating those who has AIDS and looking after them An information campaign on the types of behaviour which expose people to infection by the AIDS virus Treating those who are HIV positive to delay the onset of AIDS Try harder to identify the people who are HIV positive or who have AIDS 90% 89% 88% 88% 81% Consequently with the vast agreement shown at the level of the EU25, we do not find significant differences at a national level. Yet some general remarks can be made: Some countries systematically display more enthusiasm for this idea. These are France, Luxembourg or Greece as well as Portugal and Italy. Amongst the new Member States, Cyprus is the country with a more positive attitude towards the principle of extra collaboration and harmonisation. On the contrary, relatively half-hearted support comes mainly from the United Kingdom and Denmark even if levels of agreement are somewhat lower as well as in Spain with regards to collaboration on treatments aiming to delay the onset of AIDS and as far as identification of people who are HIV positive or who have AIDS is concerned. Amongst the acceding countries, Romania shows the highest level of support in each of the 5 measures tested, while amongst the candidates, Croatia is more enthusiastic than Turkey. - - - 41 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” - Levels of support in Turkey as well as in the Turkish Cypriot community are lower than in the rest of the countries. As far as the evolution of results compared to the former survey is concerned, the most important variations are found in Denmark: the positive perception of further collaboration within the Union decreases for the five analysed possibilities. The drop in the results is especially significant with regards to the information campaigns on risky issues which falls 11 percent points compared to the previous outcome, as well as with regards to “funding research to find an AIDS vaccine” with a 9 percent point decrease. Looking at the socio-demographic breakdowns no significant differences can be found. Only respondent age and end of education seem to somewhat distinguish between respondents: the younger the interviewee the more he/she believes in the utility of this “partnership” within the European Union. In the same way, students and people with a higher level of education are more likely to believe in the utility of harmonising efforts and further collaboration. - - 42 - SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 240 “Aids Prevention” CONCLUSION The level of awareness regarding HIV/AIDS is high in The European Union and in the acceding and candidate countries and the non government controlled areas of Cyprus. “Being injected with a needle which has been used by someone with AIDS or who is HIV positive”, “Receiving blood from someone with AIDS or who is HIV positive” and “Having sex without protection with someone with AIDS or who is HIV positive” are widely acknowledged by a clear majority of respondents as ways to catch HIV. Nevertheless we have observed somewhat more hesitance when it comes to statements which do not represent a way of contracting HIV. A general tendency was observed. The citizens from the old EU15 Member States give the correct answer more often than those from the ten New Member States. Compared to the 2002 survey in the old Member States, awareness has significantly and often systematically dropped in Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom. On the contrary awareness levels are now notably higher in Portugal, Germany and sometimes better in France and Belgium. The awareness of the emergence and spread of AIDS led to a change in people’s behaviour for “taking more precautions during their sexual intercourse” and “seeking more stability in their choice of partners”. Other behavioural changes are more marked among the 10 New Member States citizens than in the old European Union Member States. Regarding the effectiveness levels of measures undertaken at the national level, three measures top the ranking. Almost 7 out of 10 citizens believe that “Treating those who have AIDS and looking after them” is the most effective measure undertaken in their respective countries. About the same proportion refers to information campaigns on the types of hazardous behaviour that expose people to AIDS, as well as to “treating those who are HIV positive to delay the onset” of the disease. The citizens from the old EU15 Member States systematically rate the measures undertaken in their respective countries as more effective than those from the ten New Member States. Lastly, the results of this survey confirm that there is an overwhelming support for further collaboration and harmonisation of efforts within the European Union. - 43 - ANNEXES Questionnaire A your survey number EB63.4 A B country code EB63.4 B C our survey number EB63.4 C D Interview number EB63.4 D Q1 What is your nationality? Please tell me the country(ies) that applies(y). (MULTIPLE ANSWERS POSSIBLE) Belgium Denmark Germany Greece Spain France Ireland Italy Luxembourg Netherlands Portugal United Kingdom (Great Britain, Northern Ireland) Austria Sweden Finland Republic of Cyprus Czech Republic Estonia Hungary Latvia Lithuania Malta Poland Slovakia Slovenia Other countries DK EB63.4 Q1 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, IF OTHER or DK THEN CLOSE INTERVIEW ASK D15b ONLY IF NOT DOING ANY PAID WORK CURRENTLY - CODES 1 TO 4 IN D. 15. a. D15a D15b What is your current occupation? Did you do any paid work in the past? What was your last occupation? D15a CURRENT OCCUPATION NON-ACTIVE Responsible for ordinary shopping and looking after the home, or without any current occupation, not working Student Unemployed or temporarily not working Retired or unable to work through illness SELF EMPLOYED Farmer Fisherman Professional (lawyer, medical practitioner, accountant, architect, etc.) Owner of a shop, craftsmen, other self-employed person Business proprietors, owner (full or partner) of a company EMPLOYED Employed professional (employed doctor, lawyer, accountant, architect) General management, director or top management (managing directors, director general, other director) Middle management, other management (department head, junior manager, teacher, technician) Employed position, working mainly at a desk Employed position, not at a desk but travelling (salesmen, driver, etc.) Employed position, not at a desk, but in a service job (hospital, restaurant, police, fireman, etc.) Supervisor Skilled manual worker Other (unskilled) manual worker, servant NEVER DID ANY PAID WORK EB63.4 D15a D15b 1 D15b LAST OCCUPATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Now moving on another topic. ASK ALL QD1 In your opinion, can AIDS be caught by each of the following ways? (SHOW CARD – ONE ANSWER PER LINE) (READ OUT – ROTATE) 1 2 Eating a meal prepared by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive Handling objects touched by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive Yes 1 1 Possibly 2 2 No 3 3 DK 4 4 Drinking from a glass which has just been used by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive 4 Sitting on a toilet seat which has been used by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive 5 Being injected with a needle which has been used by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive 6 Receiving blood from someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive 7 Shaking hands with someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive 8 Kissing on the mouth someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive 9 Having sex without protection with someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive 10 Taking care of someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive 11 Giving blood 3 EB58.2 Q68 SLIGHTLY MODIFIED 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 QD2 Have the emergence and the spread of AIDS led you personally to…? (SHOW CARD – ONE ANSWER PER LINE) (READ OUT – ROTATE) 1 2 3 4 5 Taking more care over the things you touch Avoiding certain places (areas/establishments) Seek more stability in your choice of partners Avoiding certain company/types of people Take precautions in sexual intercourse Yes 1 1 1 1 1 Possibly 2 2 2 2 2 No 3 3 3 3 3 DK 4 4 4 4 4 EB58.2 Q69 TREND MODIFIED QD3 For each of these options, do you feel that the measures currently being undertaken in (OUR COUNTRY) are very effective, fairly effective, not very effective or not at all effective? (SHOW CARD – ONE ANSWER PER LINE) (READ OUT – ROTATE) Very effective 1 Fairly effective 2 Not very effective 3 Not at all effective 4 DK 1 2 3 4 An information campaign on the types of behaviour which expose people to infection by the AIDS virus Try harder to identify the people who are HIV positive or who have AIDS Treating those who are HIV positive to delay the onset of AIDS Treating those who has AIDS and looking after them Funding research to find an AIDS vaccine 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 5 1 2 3 4 5 EB58.2 Q70 TREND SLIGHTLY MODIFIED QD4 Let us look at this same list of possible measures. For each of them do you think it is useful or not to collaborate and to harmonise efforts within the European Union? (SHOW CARD – ONE ANSWER PER LINE) (READ OUT – ROTATE) Very useful 1 Fairly useful 2 Not very useful 3 Not at all useful 4 DK 1 2 3 4 An information campaign on the types of behaviour which expose people to infection by the AIDS virus Try harder to identify the people who are HIV positive or who have AIDS Treating those who are HIV positive to delay the onset of AIDS Treating those who has AIDS and looking after them Funding research to find an AIDS vaccine 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 5 1 2 3 4 5 EB58.2 Q71 TREND MODIFIED DEMOGRAPHICS ASK ALL D1 In political matters people talk of "the left" and "the right".How would you place your views on this scale? (SHOW CARD) - (INT.: DO NOT PROMPT - IF CONTACT HESITATES, TRY AGAIN) Left 1 Refusal DK EB63.4 D1 NO QUESTIONS D2 TO D6 D7 Could you give me the letter which corresponds best to your own current situation? (SHOW CARD - READ OUT - ONE ANSWER ONLY) Married Remarried Unmarried, currently living with partner Unmarried, having never lived with a partner Unmarried, having previously lived with a partner, but now on my own Divorced Separated Widowed Other (SPONTANEOUS) Refusal (SPONTANEOUS) EB63.4 D7 D8 How old were you when you stopped full-time education? (INT.: IF "STILL STUDYING", CODE ‘00’) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Right 10 11 12 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 EB63.4 D8 NO QUESTION D9 D10 Gender. Male Female EB63.4 D10 D11 How old are you? 1 2 EB63.4 D11 NO QUESTION D12 TO D14 D15 a&b ASKED BEFORE Q1 NO QUESTIONS D16 TO D24 D25 Would you say you live in a...? (READ OUT) Rural area or village Small or middle sized town Large town DK EB63.4 D25 NO QUESTIONS D26 TO D39 D40a Could you tell me how many people aged 15 years or more live in your household, yourself included? INT.: READ OUT - WRITE DOWN) 1 2 3 4 EB63.4 D40a D40b Could you tell me how many children less than 10 years old live in your household? INT.: READ OUT - WRITE DOWN) EB63.4 D40b D40c Could you tell me how many children aged 10 to 14 years old live in your household? INT.: READ OUT - WRITE DOWN) EB63.4 D40c D41 You personally, were you born…? (SHOW CARD - READ OUT - ONE ANSWER ONLY) In (OUR COUNTRY) In another Member Country of the European Union In Europe, but not in a Member Country of the European Union In Asia, in Africa or in Latin America In Northern America, in Japan or in Oceania Refusal (SPONTANEOUS) EB63.4 D41 D42 Which of these proposals corresponds to your situation? (SHOW CARD - READ OUT - ONE ANSWER ONLY) Your mother and your father were born in (OUR COUNTRY) One of your parents was born in (OUR COUNTRY) and the other was born in another Member State of the European Union Your mother and your father were born in another Member State of the European Union Another situation (SPONTANEOUS) (M) DK/Refusal (SPONTANEOUS) EB63.4 D42 D43a D43b Do you own a fixed telephone? Do you own a mobile telephone? D43a Fixed 1 2 D43b Mobile 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 Yes No EB63.4 D43a D43b INTERVIEW PROTOCOLE P1 DATE OF INTERVIEW DAY EB63.4 P1 P2 TIME OF THE BEGINNING OF THE INTERVIEW (INT.:USE 24 HOUR CLOCK) HOUR EB63.4 P2 P3 NUMBER OF MINUTES THE INTERVIEW LASTED MINUTES EB63.4 P3 P4 Number of persons present during the interview, including interviewer Two (interviewer and respondent) Three Four Five or more EB63.4 P4 P5 Respondent cooperation Excellent Fair Average Bad EB63.4 P5 P6 Size of locality (LOCAL CODES) 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 MINUTES MONTH EB63.4 P6 P7 Region (LOCAL CODES) EB63.4 P7 P8 Postal code EB63.4 P8 P9 Sample point number EB63.4 P9 P10 Interviewer number EB63.4 P10 P11 Weighting factor EB63.4 P11 ASK ONLY in LU, BE, ES, FI, EE, LV, MT and TR P13 Language of interview Language 1 Language 2 Language 3 EB63.4 P13 1 2 3 Technical note and data tables EU25 SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER N°240 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Between the 2nd of September and the 6th of October 2005, TNS Opinion & Social, a consortium created between Taylor Nelson Sofres and EOS Gallup Europe, carried out wave 64.1 of the EUROBAROMETER, on request of the EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Directorate-General Press and Communication, Opinion Polls. The SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER N°240 is part of wave 64.1 and covers the population of the respective nationalities of the European Union Member States, resident in each of the Member States and aged 15 years and over. The basic sample design applied in all states is a multi-stage, random (probability) one. In each country, a number of sampling points was drawn with probability proportional to population size (for a total coverage of the country) and to population density. In order to do so, the sampling points were drawn systematically from each of the "administrative regional units", after stratification by individual unit and type of area. They thus represent the whole territory of the countries surveyed according to the EUROSTAT NUTS II (or equivalent) and according to the distribution of the resident population of the respective nationalities in terms of metropolitan, urban and rural areas. In each of the selected sampling points, a starting address was drawn, at random. Further addresses (every Nth address) were selected by standard "random route" procedures, from the initial address. In each household, the respondent was drawn, at random (following the "closest birthday rule"). All interviews were conducted face-to-face in people's homes and in the appropriate national language. As far as the data capture is concerned, CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interview) was used in those countries where this technique was available. « AIDS prevention » ABREVIATIONS BE CZ DK DE EE EL ES FR IE IT CY LV LT LU HU MT NL AT PL PT SI SK FI SE UK TOTAL COUNTRIES Belgium Czech Rep. Denmark Germany Estonia Greece Spain France Ireland Italy Rep. of Cyprus Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Hungary Malta Netherlands Austria Poland Portugal Slovenia Slovakia Finland Sweden United Kingdom INSTITUTES TNS Dimarso TNS Aisa TNS Gallup DK TNS Infratest Emor TNS ICAP TNS Demoscopia TNS Sofres TNS MRBI TNS Abacus Synovate TNS Latvia TNS Gallup Lithuania TNS ILReS TNS Hungary MISCO TNS NIPO Österreichisches Gallup-Institute TNS OBOP TNS EUROTESTE RM PLUS TNS AISA SK TNS Gallup Oy TNS GALLUP TNS UK N° INTERVIEWS 1.047 1.011 1.011 1.528 1.009 1.000 1.016 1.014 1.000 1.000 502 1.049 1.002 500 1.012 500 1.000 1.012 999 1.000 1.037 1.056 1.004 1.000 1.334 24.643 FIELDWORK DATES 07/09/2005 03/10/2005 07/09/2005 29/09/2005 08/09/2005 06/10/2005 07/09/2005 30/09/2005 09/09/2005 03/10/2005 05/09/2005 03/10/2005 08/09/2005 04/10/2005 05/09/2005 03/10/2005 06/09/2005 05/10/2005 11/09/2005 03/10/2005 05/09/2005 03/10/2005 07/09/2005 03/10/2005 07/09/2005 29/09/2005 03/09/2005 28/09/2005 14/09/2005 03/10/2005 05/09/2005 30/09/2005 07/09/2005 03/10/2005 08/09/2005 03/10/2005 07/09/2005 03/10/2005 08/09/2005 06/10/2005 04/09/2005 03/10/2005 07/09/2005 22/09/2005 08/09/2005 03/10/2005 07/09/2005 04/10/2005 02/09/2005 03/10/2005 02/09/2005 06/10/2005 POPULATION 15+ 8.598.982 8.571.710 4.380.063 64.174.295 887.094 8.674.230 35.882.820 44.010.619 3.089.775 49.208.000 552.213 1.394.351 2.803.661 367.199 8.503.379 322.917 13.242.328 6.679.444 31.610.437 8.080.915 1.663.869 4.316.438 4.279.286 7.376.680 47.685.578 366.356.283 For each country a comparison between the sample and the universe was carried out. The Universe description was derived from Eurostat population data or from national statistics offices. For all countries surveyed, a national weighting procedure, using marginal and intercellular weighting, was carried out based on this Universe description. In all countries, gender, age, region and size of locality were introduced in the iteration procedure. For international weighting (i.e. EU averages), TNS Opinion & Social applies the official population figures as provided by EUROSTAT or national statistic offices. The total population figures for input in this post-weighting procedure are listed above. Readers are reminded that survey results are estimations, the accuracy of which, everything being equal, rests upon the sample size and upon the observed percentage. With samples of about 1,000 interviews, the real percentages vary within the following confidence limits: Observed percentages Confidence limits 10% or 90% ± 1.9 points 20% or 80% ± 2.5 points 30% or 70% ± 2.7 points 40% or 60% ± 3.0 points 50% ± 3.1 points QD1.1 Selon vous, le SIDA peut-il être attrapé de chacune des façons suivantes ? QD1.1 In your opinion, can AIDS be caught by each of the following ways? En mangeant un repas préparé par un malade du SIDA ou une personne séropositive Eating a meal prepared by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive TOTAL UE25 EU25 24642 BE 1047 CZ 1011 DK 1011 DE 1528 EE 1009 EL 1000 ES 1016 FR 1014 IE 1000 IT 1000 CY 502 LV 1049 LT 1002 LU 500 HU 1012 MT 500 NL 1000 AT 1012 PL 999 PT 1000 SI 1037 SK 1056 FI 1003 SE 1000 UK 1334 Sexe / Sex Homme / Male 11882 Femme / Female 12760 Age 15-24 3758 25-39 6538 40-54 6299 55 + 8047 Age de fin d'études / Education (End of) 15 5879 16-19 9871 20+ 5753 Tjs étudiant / Still Studying 2560 Composition du ménage / Household composition 1 4662 2 7495 3 4865 4+ 7619 Echelle d'occupation du répondant / Respondant occupation scale Indépendants / Self- employed 1937 Cadres directeurs / Managers 2320 Autres employés / Other white collars 2622 Ouvriers / Manual workers 4743 Femmes- hommes au foyer / House person 2519 Chômeurs / Unemployed 1758 Retraités / Retired 6184 Etudiants / Students 2560 Urbanisation subjective / Subjective urbanisation Village rural / Rural village 8632 Petite moyenne ville / Small/ mid size tow 9822 Grande ville / Large town 6159 Oui / Yes 7% 5% 8% 3% 4% 9% 6% 7% 4% 4% 12% 10% 11% 18% 5% 11% 8% 3% 10% 12% 3% 9% 13% 4% 2% 3% 7% 6% 5% 5% 6% 10% 10% 7% 4% 4% 9% 7% 5% 6% 7% 3% 4% 5% 9% 8% 10% 4% 7% 6% 6% Peut-être / Possibly 17% 17% 29% 8% 18% 21% 21% 10% 11% 13% 26% 21% 26% 32% 9% 29% 13% 12% 20% 19% 18% 30% 24% 17% 9% 14% 18% 17% 15% 15% 17% 20% 19% 18% 15% 15% 19% 17% 17% 16% 17% 13% 17% 15% 19% 17% 21% 15% 16% 18% 17% Non / No 70% 78% 58% 85% 74% 60% 67% 72% 80% 71% 58% 65% 58% 39% 83% 52% 73% 83% 64% 60% 72% 57% 60% 78% 88% 76% 70% 70% 77% 78% 73% 59% 59% 71% 79% 78% 64% 69% 73% 74% 72% 82% 76% 76% 64% 70% 58% 78% 70% 70% 72% NSP / DK 6% 0% 4% 4% 5% 9% 6% 11% 4% 12% 4% 5% 6% 10% 3% 8% 7% 2% 6% 9% 7% 4% 3% 1% 1% 6% 5% 6% 3% 3% 4% 11% 12% 5% 2% 2% 9% 6% 5% 4% 4% 2% 2% 4% 8% 5% 11% 2% 7% 5% 4% QD1.2 Selon vous, le SIDA peut-il être attrapé de chacune des façons suivantes ? QD1.2 In your opinion, can AIDS be caught by each of the following ways? En manipulant des objets qu'a touché un malade du SIDA ou une personne séropositive Handling objects touched by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive TOTAL UE25 EU25 24642 BE 1047 CZ 1011 DK 1011 DE 1528 EE 1009 EL 1000 ES 1016 FR 1014 IE 1000 IT 1000 CY 502 LV 1049 LT 1002 LU 500 HU 1012 MT 500 NL 1000 AT 1012 PL 999 PT 1000 SI 1037 SK 1056 FI 1003 SE 1000 UK 1334 Sexe / Sex Homme / Male 11882 Femme / Female 12760 Age 15-24 3758 25-39 6538 40-54 6299 55 + 8047 Age de fin d'études / Education (End of) 15 5879 16-19 9871 20+ 5753 Tjs étudiant / Still Studying 2560 Composition du ménage / Household composition 1 4662 2 7495 3 4865 4+ 7619 Echelle d'occupation du répondant / Respondant occupation scale 1937 Indépendants / Self- employed 2320 Cadres directeurs / Managers Autres employés / Other white collars 2622 Ouvriers / Manual workers 4743 Femmes- hommes au foyer / House perso 2519 1758 Chômeurs / Unemployed Retraités / Retired 6184 Etudiants / Students 2560 Urbanisation subjective / Subjective urbanisation 8632 Village rural / Rural village Petite moyenne ville / Small/ mid size tow 9822 6159 Grande ville / Large town Oui / Yes 5% 6% 7% 2% 2% 6% 4% 6% 5% 4% 12% 5% 8% 11% 6% 6% 8% 2% 6% 8% 4% 8% 12% 3% 1% 3% 6% 5% 3% 4% 5% 8% 8% 5% 4% 3% 7% 6% 4% 4% 7% 3% 4% 4% 7% 6% 9% 3% 6% 6% 4% Peut-être / Possibly 13% 12% 19% 7% 11% 16% 12% 6% 12% 11% 21% 11% 20% 21% 7% 19% 13% 6% 17% 14% 14% 18% 24% 11% 6% 10% 13% 13% 10% 10% 12% 16% 16% 13% 9% 11% 16% 13% 11% 12% 10% 8% 11% 12% 15% 12% 17% 11% 12% 13% 13% Non / No 78% 82% 72% 88% 82% 71% 79% 80% 79% 75% 64% 81% 67% 60% 85% 69% 73% 91% 73% 73% 76% 72% 60% 85% 92% 83% 78% 77% 85% 84% 80% 67% 66% 79% 85% 85% 70% 76% 82% 81% 80% 87% 84% 82% 73% 78% 66% 85% 76% 78% 79% NSP / DK 4% 0% 3% 3% 4% 6% 4% 8% 3% 10% 3% 3% 6% 9% 2% 5% 6% 1% 4% 6% 6% 2% 3% 1% 1% 5% 4% 5% 2% 2% 3% 9% 10% 3% 2% 2% 7% 5% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 3% 6% 4% 9% 2% 6% 4% 3% QD1.3 Selon vous, le SIDA peut-il être attrapé de chacune des façons suivantes ? QD1.3 In your opinion, can AIDS be caught by each of the following ways? En buvant dans un verre que vient d'utiliser un malade du SIDA ou une personne séropositive Drinking from a glass which has just been used by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive TOTAL UE25 EU25 24642 BE 1047 CZ 1011 DK 1011 DE 1528 EE 1009 EL 1000 ES 1016 FR 1014 IE 1000 IT 1000 CY 502 LV 1049 LT 1002 LU 500 HU 1012 MT 500 NL 1000 AT 1012 PL 999 PT 1000 SI 1037 SK 1056 FI 1003 SE 1000 UK 1334 Sexe / Sex Homme / Male 11882 Femme / Female 12760 Age 15-24 3758 25-39 6538 40-54 6299 55 + 8047 Age de fin d'études / Education (End of) 15 5879 16-19 9871 20+ 5753 Tjs étudiant / Still Studying 2560 Composition du ménage / Household composition 1 4662 2 7495 3 4865 4+ 7619 Echelle d'occupation du répondant / Respondant occupation scale 1937 Indépendants / Self- employed 2320 Cadres directeurs / Managers Autres employés / Other white collars 2622 Ouvriers / Manual workers 4743 Femmes- hommes au foyer / House perso 2519 1758 Chômeurs / Unemployed Retraités / Retired 6184 Etudiants / Students 2560 Urbanisation subjective / Subjective urbanisation 8632 Village rural / Rural village Petite moyenne ville / Small/ mid size tow 9822 6159 Grande ville / Large town Oui / Yes 15% 14% 18% 7% 11% 17% 16% 16% 14% 11% 21% 23% 17% 28% 20% 25% 19% 11% 16% 21% 10% 22% 29% 12% 11% 12% 15% 16% 12% 12% 15% 20% 21% 16% 11% 11% 17% 17% 14% 14% 13% 9% 13% 14% 19% 18% 20% 11% 16% 16% 14% Peut-être / Possibly 27% 22% 39% 19% 29% 28% 37% 18% 17% 28% 37% 42% 31% 29% 26% 31% 30% 19% 36% 25% 31% 36% 34% 33% 36% 25% 26% 28% 25% 23% 27% 32% 30% 28% 24% 24% 29% 28% 27% 26% 26% 24% 26% 24% 30% 24% 32% 24% 26% 28% 27% Non / No 52% 63% 39% 70% 55% 46% 41% 55% 64% 48% 39% 32% 47% 34% 51% 37% 43% 67% 42% 45% 50% 39% 33% 54% 51% 56% 54% 50% 60% 62% 54% 37% 39% 52% 62% 62% 46% 49% 54% 56% 56% 64% 58% 58% 43% 53% 37% 62% 50% 51% 54% NSP / DK 6% 0% 4% 4% 5% 9% 6% 11% 5% 13% 3% 3% 5% 9% 3% 6% 8% 3% 6% 9% 10% 4% 4% 1% 2% 7% 5% 6% 3% 3% 4% 10% 11% 5% 3% 3% 9% 7% 5% 4% 5% 3% 3% 3% 8% 5% 11% 3% 7% 5% 5% QD1.4 Selon vous, le SIDA peut-il être attrapé de chacune des façons suivantes ? QD1.4 In your opinion, can AIDS be caught by each of the following ways? En s'asseyant sur un siège de toilette qui vient d'être utilisé par un malade du SIDA ou une personne séropositive Sitting on a toilet seat which has been used by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive TOTAL UE25 EU25 24642 BE 1047 CZ 1011 DK 1011 DE 1528 EE 1009 EL 1000 ES 1016 FR 1014 IE 1000 IT 1000 CY 502 LV 1049 LT 1002 LU 500 HU 1012 MT 500 NL 1000 AT 1012 PL 999 PT 1000 SI 1037 SK 1056 FI 1003 SE 1000 UK 1334 Sexe / Sex Homme / Male 11882 Femme / Female 12760 Age 15-24 3758 25-39 6538 40-54 6299 55 + 8047 Age de fin d'études / Education (End of) 15 5879 16-19 9871 20+ 5753 Tjs étudiant / Still Studying 2560 Composition du ménage / Household composition 1 4662 2 7495 3 4865 4+ 7619 Echelle d'occupation du répondant / Respondant occupation scale 1937 Indépendants / Self- employed 2320 Cadres directeurs / Managers Autres employés / Other white collars 2622 Ouvriers / Manual workers 4743 Femmes- hommes au foyer / House perso 2519 1758 Chômeurs / Unemployed Retraités / Retired 6184 Etudiants / Students 2560 Urbanisation subjective / Subjective urbanisation 8632 Village rural / Rural village Petite moyenne ville / Small/ mid size tow 9822 6159 Grande ville / Large town Oui / Yes 13% 11% 11% 6% 8% 13% 27% 13% 12% 11% 23% 24% 14% 20% 13% 19% 16% 5% 11% 18% 13% 16% 29% 7% 7% 5% 12% 14% 10% 9% 11% 18% 19% 12% 9% 9% 15% 13% 11% 12% 13% 6% 8% 11% 18% 14% 18% 9% 13% 14% 11% Peut-être / Possibly 26% 22% 31% 17% 27% 26% 42% 18% 23% 25% 37% 35% 30% 31% 26% 34% 29% 14% 34% 29% 32% 32% 40% 26% 22% 16% 24% 27% 25% 23% 25% 29% 28% 26% 23% 27% 28% 26% 25% 25% 26% 18% 25% 25% 28% 24% 29% 27% 25% 26% 26% Non / No 55% 67% 52% 73% 61% 51% 25% 56% 59% 51% 35% 37% 48% 36% 58% 41% 45% 77% 49% 42% 45% 48% 26% 65% 70% 73% 57% 52% 61% 64% 58% 42% 41% 56% 65% 61% 49% 53% 58% 58% 56% 73% 63% 60% 45% 54% 42% 61% 54% 54% 58% NSP / DK 7% 1% 6% 5% 5% 10% 5% 13% 6% 13% 5% 4% 8% 13% 3% 6% 10% 3% 6% 10% 10% 4% 5% 2% 2% 7% 6% 7% 4% 4% 5% 11% 11% 6% 4% 3% 8% 7% 6% 5% 5% 3% 4% 5% 9% 8% 11% 3% 8% 6% 5% QD1.5 Selon vous, le SIDA peut-il être attrapé de chacune des façons suivantes ? QD1.5 In your opinion, can AIDS be caught by each of the following ways? En étant piqué par une seringue qui vient de servir à un malade du SIDA ou une personne séropositive Being injected with a needle which has been used by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive TOTAL UE25 EU25 24642 BE 1047 CZ 1011 DK 1011 DE 1528 EE 1009 EL 1000 ES 1016 FR 1014 IE 1000 IT 1000 CY 502 LV 1049 LT 1002 LU 500 HU 1012 MT 500 NL 1000 AT 1012 PL 999 PT 1000 SI 1037 SK 1056 FI 1003 SE 1000 UK 1334 Sexe / Sex Homme / Male 11882 Femme / Female 12760 Age 15-24 3758 25-39 6538 40-54 6299 55 + 8047 Age de fin d'études / Education (End of) 15 5879 16-19 9871 20+ 5753 Tjs étudiant / Still Studying 2560 Composition du ménage / Household composition 1 4662 2 7495 3 4865 4+ 7619 Echelle d'occupation du répondant / Respondant occupation scale 1937 Indépendants / Self- employed 2320 Cadres directeurs / Managers Autres employés / Other white collars 2622 Ouvriers / Manual workers 4743 Femmes- hommes au foyer / House perso 2519 1758 Chômeurs / Unemployed Retraités / Retired 6184 Etudiants / Students 2560 Urbanisation subjective / Subjective urbanisation 8632 Village rural / Rural village Petite moyenne ville / Small/ mid size tow 9822 6159 Grande ville / Large town Oui / Yes 94% 96% 97% 96% 91% 96% 95% 94% 96% 90% 91% 99% 96% 93% 98% 95% 89% 96% 94% 97% 91% 94% 92% 94% 98% 95% 94% 94% 95% 94% 95% 92% 91% 95% 95% 95% 92% 94% 95% 94% 95% 95% 94% 95% 93% 95% 92% 95% 93% 94% 94% Peut-être / Possibly 3% 3% 2% 2% 4% 2% 2% 3% 3% 6% 6% 1% 2% 3% 1% 3% 1% 3% 4% 1% 6% 4% 4% 4% 1% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% 4% 3% 4% 3% 3% 4% 5% 3% 3% 4% 3% 3% 4% 3% 4% 4% 3% 4% 3% 3% 3% Non / No 1% 1% 0% 1% 3% 0% 1% 1% 0% 1% 3% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 10% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% NSP / DK 1% 0% 1% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% 0% 4% 1% 0% 1% 3% 0% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% 2% 0% 1% 1% 3% 3% 1% 0% 0% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 0% 3% 0% 2% 1% 1% QD1.6 Selon vous, le SIDA peut-il être attrapé de chacune des façons suivantes ? QD1.6 In your opinion, can AIDS be caught by each of the following ways? En recevant du sang qui vient d'un malade du SIDA ou d'une personne séropositive Receiving blood from someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive TOTAL UE25 EU25 24642 BE 1047 CZ 1011 DK 1011 DE 1528 EE 1009 EL 1000 ES 1016 FR 1014 IE 1000 IT 1000 CY 502 LV 1049 LT 1002 LU 500 HU 1012 MT 500 NL 1000 AT 1012 PL 999 PT 1000 SI 1037 SK 1056 FI 1003 SE 1000 UK 1334 Sexe / Sex Homme / Male 11882 Femme / Female 12760 Age 15-24 3758 25-39 6538 40-54 6299 55 + 8047 Age de fin d'études / Education (End of) 15 5879 16-19 9871 20+ 5753 Tjs étudiant / Still Studying 2560 Composition du ménage / Household composition 1 4662 2 7495 3 4865 4+ 7619 Echelle d'occupation du répondant / Respondant occupation scale 1937 Indépendants / Self- employed 2320 Cadres directeurs / Managers Autres employés / Other white collars 2622 Ouvriers / Manual workers 4743 Femmes- hommes au foyer / House perso 2519 1758 Chômeurs / Unemployed Retraités / Retired 6184 Etudiants / Students 2560 Urbanisation subjective / Subjective urbanisation 8632 Village rural / Rural village Petite moyenne ville / Small/ mid size tow 9822 6159 Grande ville / Large town Oui / Yes 94% 97% 98% 97% 91% 96% 93% 93% 97% 91% 93% 99% 96% 94% 99% 96% 89% 98% 94% 97% 91% 94% 96% 97% 99% 94% 95% 94% 96% 95% 95% 92% 91% 95% 96% 96% 93% 93% 96% 95% 95% 96% 95% 95% 93% 96% 92% 96% 94% 95% 94% Peut-être / Possibly 3% 1% 1% 0% 4% 1% 3% 3% 2% 5% 4% 0% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 4% 2% 6% 4% 3% 2% 0% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 3% 3% 4% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 3% 3% 4% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Non / No 1% 1% 0% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 0% 1% 0% 2% 9% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% NSP / DK 2% 0% 1% 2% 3% 2% 1% 3% 1% 3% 1% 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 0% 0% 2% 1% 2% 0% 1% 1% 4% 4% 1% 0% 0% 3% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 0% 4% 0% 2% 1% 1% QD1.7 Selon vous, le SIDA peut-il être attrapé de chacune des façons suivantes ? QD1.7 In your opinion, can AIDS be caught by each of the following ways? En serrant la main d'un malade du SIDA ou d'une personne séropositive Shaking hands with someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive TOTAL UE25 EU25 24642 BE 1047 CZ 1011 DK 1011 DE 1528 EE 1009 EL 1000 ES 1016 FR 1014 IE 1000 IT 1000 CY 502 LV 1049 LT 1002 LU 500 HU 1012 MT 500 NL 1000 AT 1012 PL 999 PT 1000 SI 1037 SK 1056 FI 1003 SE 1000 UK 1334 Sexe / Sex Homme / Male 11882 Femme / Female 12760 Age 15-24 3758 25-39 6538 40-54 6299 55 + 8047 Age de fin d'études / Education (End of) 15 5879 16-19 9871 20+ 5753 Tjs étudiant / Still Studying 2560 Composition du ménage / Household composition 1 4662 2 7495 3 4865 4+ 7619 Echelle d'occupation du répondant / Respondant occupation scale 1937 Indépendants / Self- employed 2320 Cadres directeurs / Managers Autres employés / Other white collars 2622 Ouvriers / Manual workers 4743 Femmes- hommes au foyer / House perso 2519 1758 Chômeurs / Unemployed Retraités / Retired 6184 Etudiants / Students 2560 Urbanisation subjective / Subjective urbanisation 8632 Village rural / Rural village Petite moyenne ville / Small/ mid size tow 9822 6159 Grande ville / Large town Oui / Yes 5% 2% 5% 2% 2% 5% 6% 8% 2% 4% 10% 3% 6% 10% 2% 6% 9% 1% 4% 5% 10% 5% 11% 3% 1% 1% 5% 4% 4% 3% 4% 7% 7% 4% 3% 3% 6% 5% 4% 4% 5% 1% 3% 4% 7% 4% 6% 3% 5% 5% 4% Peut-être / Possibly 9% 7% 13% 4% 9% 13% 14% 4% 3% 12% 17% 10% 13% 20% 5% 17% 8% 3% 14% 10% 11% 16% 23% 9% 5% 5% 9% 9% 7% 7% 9% 12% 12% 9% 6% 7% 11% 9% 8% 8% 8% 5% 8% 8% 10% 8% 12% 7% 8% 9% 9% Non / No 83% 91% 80% 92% 85% 76% 76% 81% 93% 77% 71% 85% 77% 63% 91% 73% 79% 96% 77% 80% 74% 77% 62% 86% 93% 90% 83% 83% 89% 89% 85% 74% 73% 84% 90% 89% 78% 82% 86% 86% 85% 91% 88% 86% 78% 85% 74% 89% 82% 84% 85% NSP / DK 3% 0% 2% 2% 4% 6% 4% 7% 1% 7% 2% 2% 4% 7% 1% 5% 5% 0% 5% 5% 6% 3% 4% 1% 1% 3% 3% 4% 1% 1% 2% 7% 8% 2% 1% 1% 5% 4% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 5% 3% 7% 1% 5% 3% 2% QD1.8 Selon vous, le SIDA peut-il être attrapé de chacune des façons suivantes ? QD1.8 In your opinion, can AIDS be caught by each of the following ways? En embrassant sur la bouche un malade du SIDA ou une personne séropositive Kissing on the mouth someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive TOTAL UE25 EU25 24642 BE 1047 CZ 1011 DK 1011 DE 1528 EE 1009 EL 1000 ES 1016 FR 1014 IE 1000 IT 1000 CY 502 LV 1049 LT 1002 LU 500 HU 1012 MT 500 NL 1000 AT 1012 PL 999 PT 1000 SI 1037 SK 1056 FI 1003 SE 1000 UK 1334 Sexe / Sex Homme / Male 11882 Femme / Female 12760 Age 15-24 3758 25-39 6538 40-54 6299 55 + 8047 Age de fin d'études / Education (End of) 15 5879 16-19 9871 20+ 5753 Tjs étudiant / Still Studying 2560 Composition du ménage / Household composition 1 4662 2 7495 3 4865 4+ 7619 Echelle d'occupation du répondant / Respondant occupation scale 1937 Indépendants / Self- employed 2320 Cadres directeurs / Managers Autres employés / Other white collars 2622 Ouvriers / Manual workers 4743 Femmes- hommes au foyer / House perso 2519 1758 Chômeurs / Unemployed Retraités / Retired 6184 Etudiants / Students 2560 Urbanisation subjective / Subjective urbanisation 8632 Village rural / Rural village Petite moyenne ville / Small/ mid size tow 9822 6159 Grande ville / Large town Oui / Yes 24% 22% 35% 14% 18% 25% 35% 28% 12% 23% 32% 38% 22% 44% 29% 41% 20% 20% 21% 29% 25% 35% 47% 21% 23% 22% 23% 25% 19% 18% 23% 32% 32% 24% 19% 17% 27% 26% 22% 22% 22% 17% 21% 22% 29% 26% 31% 17% 25% 24% 23% Peut-être / Possibly 30% 25% 38% 23% 33% 34% 39% 23% 15% 38% 39% 39% 32% 27% 24% 27% 32% 19% 37% 29% 35% 36% 32% 39% 42% 29% 30% 29% 27% 29% 31% 30% 30% 30% 28% 29% 30% 29% 29% 30% 33% 29% 30% 29% 29% 26% 30% 29% 28% 30% 31% Non / No 40% 53% 24% 59% 43% 32% 21% 37% 69% 28% 25% 20% 40% 21% 44% 25% 42% 58% 36% 32% 31% 26% 16% 39% 33% 42% 41% 40% 52% 49% 41% 27% 26% 41% 49% 52% 36% 38% 43% 44% 41% 51% 46% 44% 34% 44% 28% 52% 40% 40% 41% NSP / DK 6% 0% 3% 4% 5% 8% 4% 12% 4% 11% 4% 3% 6% 8% 4% 7% 7% 3% 6% 9% 8% 3% 4% 1% 2% 7% 6% 6% 3% 4% 4% 10% 11% 5% 3% 2% 8% 7% 5% 4% 4% 4% 3% 4% 8% 5% 11% 2% 7% 6% 5% QD1.9 Selon vous, le SIDA peut-il être attrapé de chacune des façons suivantes ? QD1.9 In your opinion, can AIDS be caught by each of the following ways? En ayant des rapports sexuels sans protection avec un malade du SIDA ou une personne séropositive Having sex without protection with someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive TOTAL UE25 EU25 24642 BE 1047 CZ 1011 DK 1011 DE 1528 EE 1009 EL 1000 ES 1016 FR 1014 IE 1000 IT 1000 CY 502 LV 1049 LT 1002 LU 500 HU 1012 MT 500 NL 1000 AT 1012 PL 999 PT 1000 SI 1037 SK 1056 FI 1003 SE 1000 UK 1334 Sexe / Sex Homme / Male 11882 Femme / Female 12760 Age 15-24 3758 25-39 6538 40-54 6299 55 + 8047 Age de fin d'études / Education (End of) 15 5879 16-19 9871 20+ 5753 Tjs étudiant / Still Studying 2560 Composition du ménage / Household composition 1 4662 2 7495 3 4865 4+ 7619 Echelle d'occupation du répondant / Respondant occupation scale 1937 Indépendants / Self- employed 2320 Cadres directeurs / Managers Autres employés / Other white collars 2622 Ouvriers / Manual workers 4743 Femmes- hommes au foyer / House perso 2519 1758 Chômeurs / Unemployed Retraités / Retired 6184 Etudiants / Students 2560 Urbanisation subjective / Subjective urbanisation 8632 Village rural / Rural village Petite moyenne ville / Small/ mid size tow 9822 6159 Grande ville / Large town Oui / Yes 94% 98% 98% 95% 90% 94% 95% 94% 98% 90% 90% 99% 94% 92% 97% 95% 86% 97% 95% 95% 91% 94% 97% 96% 96% 94% 94% 93% 96% 95% 95% 90% 90% 95% 95% 95% 91% 93% 95% 95% 93% 96% 96% 95% 92% 95% 91% 95% 93% 94% 94% Peut-être / Possibly 3% 1% 1% 1% 4% 2% 2% 2% 1% 6% 7% 0% 4% 4% 1% 2% 2% 1% 3% 3% 6% 4% 2% 3% 2% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 3% 3% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 4% 2% 3% 3% 4% 3% 3% 4% 4% 3% 3% Non / No 1% 0% 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% 2% 9% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% NSP / DK 2% 0% 1% 2% 3% 3% 1% 3% 1% 4% 2% 0% 1% 3% 1% 2% 3% 0% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 0% 0% 2% 2% 2% 0% 1% 1% 4% 5% 1% 0% 0% 3% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 3% 1% 4% 0% 3% 1% 1% QD1.10 Selon vous, le SIDA peut-il être attrapé de chacune des façons suivantes ? QD1.10 In your opinion, can AIDS be caught by each of the following ways? En soignant un malade du SIDA ou une personne séropositive Taking care of someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive TOTAL UE25 EU25 24642 BE 1047 CZ 1011 DK 1011 DE 1528 EE 1009 EL 1000 ES 1016 FR 1014 IE 1000 IT 1000 CY 502 LV 1049 LT 1002 LU 500 HU 1012 MT 500 NL 1000 AT 1012 PL 999 PT 1000 SI 1037 SK 1056 FI 1003 SE 1000 UK 1334 Sexe / Sex Homme / Male 11882 Femme / Female 12760 Age 15-24 3758 25-39 6538 40-54 6299 55 + 8047 Age de fin d'études / Education (End of) 15 5879 16-19 9871 20+ 5753 Tjs étudiant / Still Studying 2560 Composition du ménage / Household composition 1 4662 2 7495 3 4865 4+ 7619 Echelle d'occupation du répondant / Respondant occupation scale 1937 Indépendants / Self- employed 2320 Cadres directeurs / Managers Autres employés / Other white collars 2622 Ouvriers / Manual workers 4743 Femmes- hommes au foyer / House perso 2519 1758 Chômeurs / Unemployed Retraités / Retired 6184 Etudiants / Students 2560 Urbanisation subjective / Subjective urbanisation 8632 Village rural / Rural village Petite moyenne ville / Small/ mid size tow 9822 6159 Grande ville / Large town Oui / Yes 12% 16% 12% 4% 6% 13% 10% 10% 26% 10% 23% 7% 17% 16% 7% 11% 10% 6% 10% 9% 11% 8% 16% 6% 4% 7% 13% 12% 9% 10% 14% 15% 15% 12% 11% 8% 14% 13% 12% 11% 12% 9% 12% 14% 15% 11% 14% 8% 12% 14% 10% Peut-être / Possibly 25% 30% 32% 12% 27% 31% 33% 12% 28% 22% 32% 32% 33% 34% 27% 28% 18% 16% 32% 25% 27% 26% 33% 17% 17% 25% 25% 26% 24% 24% 25% 28% 26% 26% 24% 24% 28% 26% 24% 25% 23% 24% 27% 24% 26% 24% 28% 24% 24% 26% 26% Non / No 58% 54% 53% 80% 63% 49% 52% 70% 44% 58% 42% 58% 45% 41% 65% 55% 66% 77% 54% 61% 56% 63% 48% 75% 77% 64% 59% 58% 65% 64% 58% 50% 50% 58% 63% 66% 52% 56% 61% 61% 61% 65% 60% 60% 52% 62% 50% 66% 58% 57% 60% NSP / DK 4% 1% 4% 3% 4% 6% 5% 8% 3% 10% 3% 3% 4% 9% 1% 6% 7% 1% 5% 5% 7% 3% 3% 1% 1% 4% 4% 5% 2% 2% 3% 8% 9% 3% 2% 2% 6% 5% 4% 3% 3% 2% 2% 3% 6% 3% 8% 2% 5% 4% 3% QD1.11 Selon vous, le SIDA peut-il être attrapé de chacune des façons suivantes ? QD1.11 In your opinion, can AIDS be caught by each of the following ways? En donnant du sang Giving blood TOTAL UE25 EU25 24642 BE 1047 CZ 1011 DK 1011 DE 1528 EE 1009 EL 1000 ES 1016 FR 1014 IE 1000 IT 1000 CY 502 LV 1049 LT 1002 LU 500 HU 1012 MT 500 NL 1000 AT 1012 PL 999 PT 1000 SI 1037 SK 1056 FI 1003 SE 1000 UK 1334 Sexe / Sex Homme / Male 11882 Femme / Female 12760 Age 15-24 3758 25-39 6538 40-54 6299 55 + 8047 Age de fin d'études / Education (End of) 15 5879 16-19 9871 20+ 5753 Tjs étudiant / Still Studying 2560 Composition du ménage / Household composition 1 4662 2 7495 3 4865 4+ 7619 Echelle d'occupation du répondant / Respondant occupation scale 1937 Indépendants / Self- employed 2320 Cadres directeurs / Managers Autres employés / Other white collars 2622 Ouvriers / Manual workers 4743 Femmes- hommes au foyer / House perso 2519 1758 Chômeurs / Unemployed Retraités / Retired 6184 Etudiants / Students 2560 Urbanisation subjective / Subjective urbanisation 8632 Village rural / Rural village Petite moyenne ville / Small/ mid size tow 9822 6159 Grande ville / Large town Oui / Yes 30% 25% 55% 7% 31% 45% 12% 25% 26% 17% 23% 6% 59% 63% 43% 26% 7% 25% 22% 50% 12% 45% 71% 23% 6% 36% 30% 30% 28% 26% 31% 32% 31% 32% 26% 27% 30% 31% 28% 29% 28% 24% 27% 30% 29% 36% 33% 27% 29% 30% 30% Peut-être / Possibly 13% 10% 11% 3% 16% 24% 16% 10% 11% 14% 15% 5% 24% 16% 11% 15% 9% 8% 16% 20% 18% 19% 11% 14% 3% 9% 12% 14% 15% 13% 12% 14% 13% 14% 12% 13% 14% 12% 13% 13% 15% 10% 14% 13% 14% 12% 14% 13% 13% 14% 12% Non / No 54% 64% 32% 87% 50% 25% 68% 58% 62% 59% 59% 86% 16% 17% 45% 55% 80% 65% 59% 26% 63% 34% 16% 62% 89% 51% 55% 52% 54% 59% 54% 48% 48% 52% 60% 57% 50% 53% 56% 55% 55% 65% 58% 55% 52% 48% 47% 57% 52% 54% 55% NSP / DK 3% 0% 1% 3% 4% 6% 4% 7% 1% 10% 2% 4% 1% 4% 2% 4% 4% 1% 3% 4% 8% 2% 2% 1% 2% 4% 3% 4% 2% 1% 2% 6% 7% 2% 2% 2% 6% 4% 3% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 5% 3% 6% 2% 5% 3% 3% QD2.1 L'émergence et la diffusion du SIDA vous ont-elles mené(e) personnellement à … ? QD2.1 Have the emergence and the spread of AIDS led you personally to…? Faire plus attention aux choses que vous touchez Taking more care over the things you touch TOTAL UE25 EU25 24642 BE 1047 CZ 1011 DK 1011 DE 1528 EE 1009 EL 1000 ES 1016 FR 1014 IE 1000 IT 1000 CY 502 LV 1049 LT 1002 LU 500 HU 1012 MT 500 NL 1000 AT 1012 PL 999 PT 1000 SI 1037 SK 1056 FI 1003 SE 1000 UK 1334 Sexe / Sex Homme / Male 11882 Femme / Female 12760 Age 15-24 3758 25-39 6538 40-54 6299 55 + 8047 Age de fin d'études / Education (End of) 15 5879 16-19 9871 20+ 5753 Tjs étudiant / Still Studying 2560 Composition du ménage / Household composition 1 4662 2 7495 3 4865 4+ 7619 Echelle d'occupation du répondant / Respondant occupation scale 1937 Indépendants / Self- employed 2320 Cadres directeurs / Managers Autres employés / Other white collars 2622 Ouvriers / Manual workers 4743 Femmes- hommes au foyer / House perso 2519 1758 Chômeurs / Unemployed Retraités / Retired 6184 Etudiants / Students 2560 Urbanisation subjective / Subjective urbanisation 8632 Village rural / Rural village Petite moyenne ville / Small/ mid size tow 9822 6159 Grande ville / Large town Oui / Yes 14% 13% 22% 8% 10% 32% 21% 11% 9% 11% 23% 29% 16% 14% 19% 16% 41% 9% 19% 23% 15% 11% 25% 8% 6% 12% 14% 15% 14% 13% 15% 15% 18% 14% 11% 14% 16% 13% 13% 15% 13% 9% 13% 15% 17% 15% 15% 14% 13% 15% 14% Peut-être / Possibly 11% 9% 16% 5% 12% 17% 10% 10% 5% 16% 19% 13% 13% 9% 8% 13% 15% 5% 17% 9% 22% 15% 18% 7% 4% 10% 11% 11% 13% 11% 12% 10% 12% 11% 10% 14% 12% 10% 11% 12% 12% 10% 13% 11% 12% 12% 10% 14% 10% 12% 12% Non / No 73% 78% 60% 85% 75% 46% 68% 78% 84% 69% 56% 57% 67% 72% 73% 69% 43% 86% 62% 65% 61% 73% 55% 84% 89% 77% 73% 72% 73% 76% 72% 71% 67% 73% 79% 72% 69% 75% 74% 71% 74% 80% 74% 73% 69% 72% 71% 72% 73% 72% 72% NSP / DK 2% 0% 2% 2% 3% 4% 1% 1% 1% 4% 2% 0% 3% 5% 0% 2% 2% 0% 2% 3% 2% 1% 2% 0% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 4% 4% 2% 1% 1% 4% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 4% 1% 3% 1% 1% QD2.2 L'émergence et la diffusion du SIDA vous ont-elles mené(e) personnellement à … ? QD2.2 Have the emergence and the spread of AIDS led you personally to…? Eviter certains endroits (régions \ établissements) Avoiding certain places (areas\establishments) TOTAL UE25 EU25 24642 BE 1047 CZ 1011 DK 1011 DE 1528 EE 1009 EL 1000 ES 1016 FR 1014 IE 1000 IT 1000 CY 502 LV 1049 LT 1002 LU 500 HU 1012 MT 500 NL 1000 AT 1012 PL 999 PT 1000 SI 1037 SK 1056 FI 1003 SE 1000 UK 1334 Sexe / Sex Homme / Male 11882 Femme / Female 12760 Age 15-24 3758 25-39 6538 40-54 6299 55 + 8047 Age de fin d'études / Education (End of) 15 5879 16-19 9871 20+ 5753 Tjs étudiant / Still Studying 2560 Composition du ménage / Household composition 1 4662 2 7495 3 4865 4+ 7619 Echelle d'occupation du répondant / Respondant occupation scale 1937 Indépendants / Self- employed 2320 Cadres directeurs / Managers Autres employés / Other white collars 2622 Ouvriers / Manual workers 4743 Femmes- hommes au foyer / House perso 2519 1758 Chômeurs / Unemployed Retraités / Retired 6184 Etudiants / Students 2560 Urbanisation subjective / Subjective urbanisation 8632 Village rural / Rural village Petite moyenne ville / Small/ mid size tow 9822 6159 Grande ville / Large town Oui / Yes 14% 10% 23% 8% 12% 30% 19% 13% 9% 11% 24% 22% 14% 16% 19% 24% 29% 2% 23% 22% 14% 4% 30% 9% 7% 8% 14% 14% 16% 14% 14% 14% 16% 14% 12% 16% 15% 13% 14% 16% 16% 9% 14% 15% 16% 15% 14% 16% 14% 16% 14% Peut-être / Possibly 9% 6% 14% 5% 9% 17% 10% 9% 4% 16% 13% 12% 11% 11% 6% 14% 12% 2% 16% 6% 18% 9% 20% 9% 4% 7% 9% 9% 9% 8% 9% 8% 9% 8% 8% 10% 10% 8% 9% 9% 9% 8% 10% 9% 9% 9% 8% 10% 9% 8% 10% Non / No 75% 83% 62% 85% 76% 47% 70% 77% 86% 69% 62% 65% 72% 66% 74% 60% 58% 97% 58% 67% 66% 86% 49% 82% 88% 83% 75% 74% 74% 77% 75% 73% 70% 75% 80% 74% 71% 77% 76% 74% 74% 82% 76% 75% 72% 75% 74% 74% 75% 74% 76% NSP / DK 2% 0% 2% 2% 3% 5% 1% 1% 1% 4% 2% 1% 3% 6% 1% 2% 1% 0% 3% 5% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 4% 5% 2% 1% 1% 4% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 2% 3% 1% 5% 1% 3% 2% 1% QD2.3 L'émergence et la diffusion du SIDA vous ont-elles mené(e) personnellement à … ? QD2.3 Have the emergence and the spread of AIDS led you personally to…? Chercher plus de stabilité dans votre choix de partenaires Seek more stability in your choice of partners TOTAL UE25 EU25 24642 BE 1047 CZ 1011 DK 1011 DE 1528 EE 1009 EL 1000 ES 1016 FR 1014 IE 1000 IT 1000 CY 502 LV 1049 LT 1002 LU 500 HU 1012 MT 500 NL 1000 AT 1012 PL 999 PT 1000 SI 1037 SK 1056 FI 1003 SE 1000 UK 1334 Sexe / Sex Homme / Male 11882 Femme / Female 12760 Age 15-24 3758 25-39 6538 40-54 6299 55 + 8047 Age de fin d'études / Education (End of) 15 5879 16-19 9871 20+ 5753 Tjs étudiant / Still Studying 2560 Composition du ménage / Household composition 1 4662 2 7495 3 4865 4+ 7619 Echelle d'occupation du répondant / Respondant occupation scale 1937 Indépendants / Self- employed 2320 Cadres directeurs / Managers Autres employés / Other white collars 2622 Ouvriers / Manual workers 4743 Femmes- hommes au foyer / House perso 2519 1758 Chômeurs / Unemployed Retraités / Retired 6184 Etudiants / Students 2560 Urbanisation subjective / Subjective urbanisation 8632 Village rural / Rural village Petite moyenne ville / Small/ mid size tow 9822 6159 Grande ville / Large town Oui / Yes 38% 36% 50% 28% 37% 53% 64% 31% 28% 27% 47% 65% 29% 41% 39% 71% 63% 20% 56% 45% 32% 47% 54% 39% 36% 27% 38% 37% 42% 45% 42% 27% 32% 40% 38% 41% 35% 34% 40% 41% 42% 35% 44% 44% 37% 45% 27% 41% 35% 38% 40% Peut-être / Possibly 8% 9% 10% 6% 8% 8% 5% 8% 6% 12% 11% 5% 10% 8% 6% 5% 7% 6% 13% 6% 18% 12% 11% 9% 9% 9% 9% 8% 14% 10% 7% 6% 6% 8% 8% 15% 10% 7% 9% 9% 8% 7% 9% 9% 8% 11% 5% 15% 8% 9% 9% Non / No 48% 50% 33% 60% 49% 23% 28% 58% 60% 47% 38% 24% 52% 38% 50% 19% 22% 68% 25% 35% 38% 39% 26% 48% 50% 58% 48% 47% 39% 42% 46% 58% 53% 46% 49% 39% 46% 53% 46% 45% 46% 53% 43% 43% 49% 39% 57% 39% 50% 47% 46% NSP / DK 6% 5% 7% 6% 6% 16% 3% 3% 5% 13% 3% 7% 9% 13% 4% 5% 9% 6% 6% 14% 12% 2% 8% 4% 6% 6% 5% 7% 5% 3% 5% 10% 9% 5% 5% 5% 9% 6% 5% 5% 4% 5% 4% 4% 6% 5% 11% 5% 8% 6% 5% QD2.4 L'émergence et la diffusion du SIDA vous ont-elles mené(e) personnellement à … ? QD2.4 Have the emergence and the spread of AIDS led you personally to…? Eviter la compagnie de certaines personnes \ sortes de gens Avoiding certain company\types of people TOTAL UE25 EU25 24642 BE 1047 CZ 1011 DK 1011 DE 1528 EE 1009 EL 1000 ES 1016 FR 1014 IE 1000 IT 1000 CY 502 LV 1049 LT 1002 LU 500 HU 1012 MT 500 NL 1000 AT 1012 PL 999 PT 1000 SI 1037 SK 1056 FI 1003 SE 1000 UK 1334 Sexe / Sex Homme / Male 11882 Femme / Female 12760 Age 15-24 3758 25-39 6538 40-54 6299 55 + 8047 Age de fin d'études / Education (End of) 15 5879 16-19 9871 20+ 5753 Tjs étudiant / Still Studying 2560 Composition du ménage / Household composition 1 4662 2 7495 3 4865 4+ 7619 Echelle d'occupation du répondant / Respondant occupation scale 1937 Indépendants / Self- employed 2320 Cadres directeurs / Managers Autres employés / Other white collars 2622 Ouvriers / Manual workers 4743 Femmes- hommes au foyer / House perso 2519 1758 Chômeurs / Unemployed Retraités / Retired 6184 Etudiants / Students 2560 Urbanisation subjective / Subjective urbanisation 8632 Village rural / Rural village Petite moyenne ville / Small/ mid size tow 9822 6159 Grande ville / Large town Oui / Yes 17% 9% 38% 7% 14% 37% 25% 14% 8% 14% 30% 39% 19% 19% 20% 21% 42% 2% 25% 26% 18% 10% 39% 14% 7% 9% 17% 17% 19% 16% 17% 16% 19% 18% 13% 19% 19% 15% 17% 18% 18% 10% 16% 17% 19% 20% 16% 19% 15% 18% 16% Peut-être / Possibly 9% 7% 16% 5% 10% 16% 13% 9% 3% 15% 14% 12% 14% 11% 7% 15% 12% 2% 18% 8% 19% 10% 17% 10% 5% 7% 9% 9% 12% 11% 9% 7% 8% 9% 10% 13% 9% 8% 10% 10% 11% 8% 10% 10% 9% 10% 7% 13% 9% 9% 11% Non / No 71% 84% 44% 85% 73% 42% 61% 75% 87% 63% 53% 47% 63% 63% 73% 63% 43% 96% 55% 61% 58% 79% 42% 75% 87% 82% 71% 72% 68% 72% 72% 72% 69% 71% 76% 67% 68% 74% 72% 70% 68% 80% 72% 71% 70% 69% 72% 67% 73% 70% 71% NSP / DK 2% 0% 2% 3% 3% 4% 2% 2% 2% 7% 3% 2% 4% 6% 1% 2% 4% 0% 2% 4% 5% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 3% 1% 1% 2% 5% 5% 2% 1% 1% 5% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 5% 1% 3% 2% 2% QD2.5 L'émergence et la diffusion du SIDA vous ont-elles mené(e) personnellement à … ? QD2.5 Have the emergence and the spread of AIDS led you personally to…? Prendre des précautions dans les relations sexuelles Take precautions in sexual intercourse TOTAL UE25 EU25 24642 BE 1047 CZ 1011 DK 1011 DE 1528 EE 1009 EL 1000 ES 1016 FR 1014 IE 1000 IT 1000 CY 502 LV 1049 LT 1002 LU 500 HU 1012 MT 500 NL 1000 AT 1012 PL 999 PT 1000 SI 1037 SK 1056 FI 1003 SE 1000 UK 1334 Sexe / Sex Homme / Male 11882 Femme / Female 12760 Age 15-24 3758 25-39 6538 40-54 6299 55 + 8047 Age de fin d'études / Education (End of) 15 5879 16-19 9871 20+ 5753 Tjs étudiant / Still Studying 2560 Composition du ménage / Household composition 1 4662 2 7495 3 4865 4+ 7619 Echelle d'occupation du répondant / Respondant occupation scale 1937 Indépendants / Self- employed 2320 Cadres directeurs / Managers Autres employés / Other white collars 2622 Ouvriers / Manual workers 4743 Femmes- hommes au foyer / House perso 2519 1758 Chômeurs / Unemployed Retraités / Retired 6184 Etudiants / Students 2560 Urbanisation subjective / Subjective urbanisation 8632 Village rural / Rural village Petite moyenne ville / Small/ mid size tow 9822 6159 Grande ville / Large town Oui / Yes 48% 53% 60% 42% 43% 56% 63% 45% 52% 41% 51% 66% 38% 34% 63% 60% 63% 38% 66% 43% 42% 40% 50% 49% 57% 46% 51% 45% 71% 61% 44% 30% 35% 47% 53% 70% 49% 42% 51% 51% 51% 49% 55% 55% 38% 59% 30% 70% 43% 49% 53% Peut-être / Possibly 6% 4% 8% 4% 7% 6% 5% 5% 1% 9% 8% 1% 8% 8% 4% 5% 4% 4% 8% 6% 16% 10% 9% 7% 5% 5% 6% 6% 7% 6% 6% 4% 5% 6% 5% 7% 6% 5% 6% 6% 6% 5% 6% 7% 6% 8% 4% 7% 6% 5% 7% Non / No 41% 38% 25% 48% 44% 23% 28% 48% 44% 37% 38% 24% 45% 46% 30% 29% 24% 53% 21% 37% 29% 48% 31% 40% 33% 43% 39% 42% 18% 30% 45% 56% 51% 42% 38% 17% 35% 47% 39% 38% 40% 42% 35% 36% 50% 29% 56% 17% 44% 41% 35% NSP / DK 6% 4% 8% 6% 6% 15% 4% 2% 3% 13% 3% 8% 9% 13% 3% 5% 8% 5% 5% 14% 13% 2% 10% 4% 6% 6% 4% 7% 4% 3% 5% 10% 9% 5% 4% 6% 9% 6% 3% 5% 4% 4% 4% 3% 6% 4% 11% 6% 7% 5% 5% QD3.1 Pour chacune de ces options, pensez-vous que les mesures actuellement entreprises en (NOTRE PAYS) sont très efficaces, plutôt efficaces, pas très efficaces ou pas du tout efficaces ? QD3.1 For each of these options, do you feel that the measures currently being undertaken in (OUR COUNTRY) are very effective, fairly effective, not very effective or not at all effective? Une campagne d'information sur les types de comportement qui exposent les gens à l'infection par le virus du SIDA An information campaign on the types of behaviour which expose people to infection by the AIDS virus TOTAL Très efficace / Very effective 22% 26% 18% 21% 27% 5% 18% 27% 24% 11% 36% 23% 4% 18% 23% 11% 27% 32% 31% 9% 11% 14% 13% 20% 13% 11% 21% 24% 23% 22% 21% 22% 23% 22% 22% 24% 20% 23% 23% 23% 21% 20% 23% 22% 27% 24% 21% 24% Assez efficace / Fairly effective 45% 45% 50% 43% 42% 42% 36% 43% 48% 41% 47% 35% 35% 39% 40% 36% 39% 46% 43% 43% 47% 54% 43% 57% 51% 45% 46% 44% 46% 46% 46% 42% 42% 44% 47% 46% 43% 44% 46% 45% 43% 46% 47% 47% 44% 39% 43% 46% Peu efficace / Not very effective 21% 24% 23% 23% 20% 33% 32% 17% 20% 23% 11% 28% 38% 23% 26% 33% 21% 16% 14% 30% 31% 20% 34% 18% 25% 24% 21% 21% 22% 22% 23% 18% 18% 23% 22% 21% 21% 20% 21% 22% 23% 25% 22% 21% 16% 25% 19% 21% Pas du tout efficace / Not at all effective 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 6% 9% 2% 5% 7% 2% 5% 6% 6% 3% 6% 5% 3% 4% 7% 3% 3% 5% 2% 4% 6% 5% 4% 4% 5% 4% 3% 3% 5% 4% 5% 4% 4% 3% 4% 5% 3% 5% 5% 3% 4% 4% 5% NSP / DK 8% 2% 6% 9% 8% 14% 4% 10% 3% 18% 4% 8% 15% 14% 8% 14% 7% 4% 8% 12% 7% 9% 5% 3% 7% 14% 7% 9% 5% 5% 6% 13% 14% 7% 5% 4% 12% 9% 7% 6% 7% 5% 3% 5% 10% 8% 14% 4% Efficace / Effective 67% 71% 67% 65% 69% 47% 54% 70% 72% 51% 83% 59% 40% 57% 63% 47% 67% 78% 74% 52% 58% 68% 56% 76% 64% 57% 67% 67% 69% 68% 67% 65% 66% 66% 69% 70% 63% 67% 69% 68% 65% 66% 70% 69% 71% 63% 63% 70% Pas efficace / Not effective 25% 27% 27% 26% 23% 39% 41% 19% 25% 30% 13% 33% 45% 29% 29% 38% 26% 18% 18% 36% 34% 23% 39% 20% 29% 29% 26% 24% 26% 27% 27% 22% 21% 27% 26% 25% 25% 24% 25% 26% 28% 28% 26% 26% 19% 29% 23% 25% UE25 EU25 24642 BE 1047 CZ 1011 DK 1011 DE 1528 EE 1009 EL 1000 ES 1016 FR 1014 IE 1000 IT 1000 CY 502 LV 1049 LT 1002 LU 500 HU 1012 MT 500 NL 1000 AT 1012 PL 999 PT 1000 SI 1037 SK 1056 FI 1003 SE 1000 UK 1334 Sexe / Sex Homme / Male 11882 Femme / Female 12760 Age 15-24 3758 25-39 6538 40-54 6299 55 + 8047 Age de fin d'études / Education (End of) 15 5879 16-19 9871 20+ 5753 Tjs étudiant / Still Studying 2560 Composition du ménage / Household composition 1 4662 2 7495 3 4865 4+ 7619 Echelle d'occupation du répondant / Respondant occupation scale Indépendants / Self- employed 1937 Cadres directeurs / Managers 2320 Autres employés / Other white collars 2622 Ouvriers / Manual workers 4743 Femmes- hommes au foyer / House person 2519 Chômeurs / Unemployed 1758 Retraités / Retired 6184 Etudiants / Students 2560 QD3.1 Pour chacune de ces options, pensez-vous que les mesures actuellement entreprises en (NOTRE PAYS) sont très efficaces, plutôt efficaces, pas très efficaces ou pas du tout efficaces ? QD3.1 For each of these options, do you feel that the measures currently being undertaken in (OUR COUNTRY) are very effective, fairly effective, not very effective or not at all effective? Une campagne d'information sur les types de comportement qui exposent les gens à l'infection par le virus du SIDA An information campaign on the types of behaviour which expose people to infection by the AIDS virus TOTAL Urbanisation subjective / Subjective urbanisation Village rural / Rural village 8632 Petite moyenne ville / Small/ mid size town 9822 Grande ville / Large town 6159 Très efficace / Very effective 21% 25% 20% Assez efficace / Fairly effective 44% 45% 45% Peu efficace / Not very effective 22% 19% 23% Pas du tout efficace / Not at all effective 4% 3% 5% NSP / DK Efficace / Effective Pas efficace / Not effective 26% 23% 28% 9% 7% 7% 65% 70% 65% QD3.2 Pour chacune de ces options, pensez-vous que les mesures actuellement entreprises en (NOTRE PAYS) sont très efficaces, plutôt efficaces, pas très efficaces ou pas du tout efficaces ? QD3.2 For each of these options, do you feel that the measures currently being undertaken in (OUR COUNTRY) are very effective, fairly effective, not very effective or not at all effective? Essayer davantage d'identifier les personnes qui sont séropositives ou qui ont le SIDA Try harder to identify the people who are HIV positive or who have AIDS TOTAL Très efficace / Very effective 16% 15% 12% 12% 17% 3% 16% 17% 16% 8% 26% 22% 4% 22% 19% 14% 20% 20% 26% 7% 13% 10% 13% 15% 15% 7% 16% 15% 17% 15% 15% 16% 16% 16% 14% 16% 15% 16% 15% 16% 15% 13% 16% 16% 19% 15% 15% 16% Assez efficace / Fairly effective 38% 39% 44% 34% 35% 30% 31% 37% 39% 34% 41% 30% 28% 33% 31% 34% 38% 40% 38% 33% 37% 46% 42% 62% 46% 42% 39% 38% 38% 39% 38% 39% 39% 37% 39% 39% 36% 39% 39% 39% 37% 37% 40% 39% 38% 36% 38% 39% Peu efficace / Not very effective 25% 29% 26% 28% 26% 40% 36% 16% 27% 26% 18% 28% 41% 23% 26% 30% 23% 22% 18% 34% 33% 28% 32% 17% 24% 24% 26% 24% 29% 26% 25% 21% 20% 26% 26% 29% 25% 23% 26% 26% 25% 30% 25% 26% 19% 26% 22% 29% Pas du tout efficace / Not at all effective 7% 11% 5% 6% 7% 7% 9% 9% 9% 9% 6% 7% 9% 7% 8% 6% 5% 5% 5% 7% 6% 5% 6% 1% 3% 5% 7% 6% 7% 9% 7% 5% 6% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 6% 7% 9% 6% 8% 8% 6% 8% 5% 7% NSP / DK 15% 6% 12% 20% 14% 19% 7% 20% 10% 23% 9% 13% 18% 15% 16% 16% 13% 14% 14% 20% 12% 12% 7% 6% 12% 23% 13% 16% 9% 12% 14% 20% 19% 14% 13% 9% 18% 16% 14% 12% 14% 13% 12% 11% 18% 15% 20% 9% Efficace / Effective 54% 54% 57% 46% 52% 34% 47% 54% 55% 42% 67% 52% 32% 55% 50% 48% 59% 60% 64% 40% 49% 55% 55% 76% 61% 49% 54% 53% 54% 53% 53% 54% 56% 53% 54% 55% 51% 54% 54% 55% 52% 51% 55% 55% 57% 52% 53% 55% Pas efficace / Not effective 31% 40% 31% 34% 33% 47% 46% 25% 36% 35% 24% 35% 50% 29% 34% 36% 29% 26% 23% 40% 39% 33% 38% 18% 27% 28% 33% 30% 36% 35% 32% 26% 26% 33% 33% 36% 31% 30% 32% 33% 34% 36% 33% 34% 25% 34% 27% 36% UE25 EU25 24642 BE 1047 CZ 1011 DK 1011 DE 1528 EE 1009 EL 1000 ES 1016 FR 1014 IE 1000 IT 1000 CY 502 LV 1049 LT 1002 LU 500 HU 1012 MT 500 NL 1000 AT 1012 PL 999 PT 1000 SI 1037 SK 1056 FI 1003 SE 1000 UK 1334 Sexe / Sex Homme / Male 11882 Femme / Female 12760 Age 15-24 3758 25-39 6538 40-54 6299 55 + 8047 Age de fin d'études / Education (End of) 15 5879 16-19 9871 20+ 5753 Tjs étudiant / Still Studying 2560 Composition du ménage / Household composition 1 4662 2 7495 3 4865 4+ 7619 Echelle d'occupation du répondant / Respondant occupation scale Indépendants / Self- employed 1937 Cadres directeurs / Managers 2320 Autres employés / Other white collars 2622 Ouvriers / Manual workers 4743 Femmes- hommes au foyer / House person 2519 Chômeurs / Unemployed 1758 Retraités / Retired 6184 Etudiants / Students 2560 QD3.2 Pour chacune de ces options, pensez-vous que les mesures actuellement entreprises en (NOTRE PAYS) sont très efficaces, plutôt efficaces, pas très efficaces ou pas du tout efficaces ? QD3.2 For each of these options, do you feel that the measures currently being undertaken in (OUR COUNTRY) are very effective, fairly effective, not very effective or not at all effective? Essayer davantage d'identifier les personnes qui sont séropositives ou qui ont le SIDA Try harder to identify the people who are HIV positive or who have AIDS TOTAL Urbanisation subjective / Subjective urbanisation Village rural / Rural village 8632 Petite moyenne ville / Small/ mid size town 9822 Grande ville / Large town 6159 Très efficace / Very effective 14% 18% 14% Assez efficace / Fairly effective 40% 38% 37% Peu efficace / Not very effective 23% 25% 27% Pas du tout efficace / Not at all effective 7% 6% 7% NSP / DK Efficace / Effective Pas efficace / Not effective 30% 31% 34% 16% 14% 14% 54% 55% 52% QD3.3 Pour chacune de ces options, pensez-vous que les mesures actuellement entreprises en (NOTRE PAYS) sont très efficaces, plutôt efficaces, pas très efficaces ou pas du tout efficaces ? QD3.3 For each of these options, do you feel that the measures currently being undertaken in (OUR COUNTRY) are very effective, fairly effective, not very effective or not at all effective? Traiter les personnes séropositives pour retarder le déclenchement de la maladie Treating those who are HIV positive to delay the onset of AIDS TOTAL Très efficace / Very effective 22% 30% 12% 35% 23% 2% 19% 21% 27% 13% 37% 24% 3% 20% 31% 11% 35% 36% 30% 7% 16% 9% 21% 19% 33% 12% 21% 23% 20% 23% 23% 22% 22% 21% 24% 23% 21% 23% 22% 23% 22% 23% 23% 21% 28% 21% 20% 23% Assez efficace / Fairly effective 45% 52% 45% 46% 46% 22% 31% 42% 52% 37% 46% 33% 25% 35% 44% 36% 34% 48% 42% 30% 37% 49% 44% 58% 49% 51% 46% 43% 47% 46% 44% 43% 43% 45% 47% 44% 43% 45% 46% 45% 42% 50% 50% 47% 41% 39% 43% 44% Peu efficace / Not very effective 17% 13% 26% 7% 16% 46% 32% 14% 11% 17% 9% 21% 42% 20% 11% 28% 11% 6% 14% 36% 31% 24% 24% 13% 8% 13% 17% 16% 20% 17% 17% 14% 14% 18% 15% 19% 17% 15% 17% 18% 18% 15% 15% 18% 12% 20% 15% 19% Pas du tout efficace / Not at all effective 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% 8% 10% 5% 2% 5% 1% 2% 8% 6% 1% 4% 3% 1% 2% 8% 5% 3% 4% 1% 1% 2% 3% 3% 4% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 4% 3% 3% 3% 4% 5% 2% 3% 3% 2% 4% 3% 4% NSP / DK 13% 4% 15% 11% 13% 22% 9% 18% 8% 28% 7% 20% 22% 19% 14% 21% 18% 9% 12% 20% 10% 15% 7% 9% 9% 22% 12% 15% 10% 11% 12% 18% 17% 13% 11% 9% 17% 14% 13% 11% 14% 10% 9% 11% 16% 15% 19% 9% Efficace / Effective 67% 82% 57% 80% 69% 24% 49% 63% 79% 50% 83% 57% 28% 55% 75% 47% 69% 84% 72% 37% 54% 58% 64% 77% 82% 63% 67% 67% 67% 69% 67% 65% 65% 66% 71% 68% 63% 67% 68% 68% 63% 73% 73% 68% 69% 61% 63% 68% Pas efficace / Not effective 20% 14% 29% 9% 19% 54% 41% 19% 13% 22% 11% 23% 50% 26% 11% 32% 13% 7% 16% 43% 36% 27% 28% 14% 8% 15% 20% 19% 23% 20% 20% 17% 17% 21% 18% 23% 19% 18% 19% 21% 23% 18% 18% 21% 15% 24% 18% 23% UE25 EU25 24642 BE 1047 CZ 1011 DK 1011 DE 1528 EE 1009 EL 1000 ES 1016 FR 1014 IE 1000 IT 1000 CY 502 LV 1049 LT 1002 LU 500 HU 1012 MT 500 NL 1000 AT 1012 PL 999 PT 1000 SI 1037 SK 1056 FI 1003 SE 1000 UK 1334 Sexe / Sex Homme / Male 11882 Femme / Female 12760 Age 15-24 3758 25-39 6538 40-54 6299 55 + 8047 Age de fin d'études / Education (End of) 15 5879 16-19 9871 20+ 5753 Tjs étudiant / Still Studying 2560 Composition du ménage / Household composition 1 4662 2 7495 3 4865 4+ 7619 Echelle d'occupation du répondant / Respondant occupation scale Indépendants / Self- employed 1937 Cadres directeurs / Managers 2320 Autres employés / Other white collars 2622 Ouvriers / Manual workers 4743 Femmes- hommes au foyer / House person 2519 Chômeurs / Unemployed 1758 Retraités / Retired 6184 Etudiants / Students 2560 QD3.3 Pour chacune de ces options, pensez-vous que les mesures actuellement entreprises en (NOTRE PAYS) sont très efficaces, plutôt efficaces, pas très efficaces ou pas du tout efficaces ? QD3.3 For each of these options, do you feel that the measures currently being undertaken in (OUR COUNTRY) are very effective, fairly effective, not very effective or not at all effective? Traiter les personnes séropositives pour retarder le déclenchement de la maladie Treating those who are HIV positive to delay the onset of AIDS TOTAL Urbanisation subjective / Subjective urbanisation Village rural / Rural village 8632 Petite moyenne ville / Small/ mid size town 9822 Grande ville / Large town 6159 Très efficace / Very effective 21% 25% 20% Assez efficace / Fairly effective 45% 44% 46% Peu efficace / Not very effective 17% 16% 17% Pas du tout efficace / Not at all effective 3% 3% 4% NSP / DK Efficace / Effective Pas efficace / Not effective 20% 19% 21% 15% 12% 13% 65% 69% 66% QD3.4 Pour chacune de ces options, pensez-vous que les mesures actuellement entreprises en (NOTRE PAYS) sont très efficaces, plutôt efficaces, pas très efficaces ou pas du tout efficaces ? QD3.4 For each of these options, do you feel that the measures currently being undertaken in (OUR COUNTRY) are very effective, fairly effective, not very effective or not at all effective? Traiter ceux qui ont le SIDA et prendre soin d'eux Treating those who has AIDS and looking after them TOTAL Très efficace / Very effective 22% 33% 13% 27% 18% 3% 18% 30% 29% 13% 36% 25% 3% 20% 33% 10% 38% 33% 29% 6% 16% 11% 19% 19% 33% 12% 22% 23% 21% 23% 23% 21% 21% 22% 23% 23% 22% 22% 22% 23% 22% 22% 24% 23% 26% 20% 20% 23% Assez efficace / Fairly effective 46% 50% 48% 49% 49% 23% 32% 46% 50% 38% 46% 32% 22% 35% 46% 41% 37% 50% 44% 32% 38% 52% 44% 62% 49% 49% 47% 45% 47% 46% 46% 45% 46% 44% 48% 47% 43% 46% 46% 46% 43% 50% 49% 46% 47% 41% 44% 47% Peu efficace / Not very effective 16% 12% 20% 8% 17% 45% 32% 10% 12% 16% 10% 22% 41% 20% 9% 25% 11% 8% 12% 37% 30% 22% 24% 12% 7% 14% 17% 16% 19% 17% 17% 15% 14% 18% 15% 20% 16% 16% 17% 17% 19% 16% 15% 17% 11% 20% 15% 20% Pas du tout efficace / Not at all effective 3% 1% 3% 1% 1% 10% 10% 2% 2% 5% 1% 2% 9% 7% 1% 5% 1% 1% 3% 7% 5% 2% 4% 1% 1% 2% 3% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% 3% 4% 2% 3% 3% 1% 5% 2% 3% NSP / DK 13% 4% 17% 14% 15% 20% 8% 12% 7% 28% 6% 18% 25% 19% 11% 19% 13% 8% 12% 19% 11% 13% 8% 6% 10% 22% 12% 14% 9% 11% 12% 17% 16% 13% 11% 8% 17% 14% 12% 11% 13% 11% 9% 11% 14% 15% 18% 8% Efficace / Effective 68% 83% 61% 77% 67% 26% 50% 76% 79% 51% 82% 57% 25% 55% 78% 51% 75% 83% 73% 38% 54% 63% 63% 81% 82% 62% 68% 67% 68% 69% 69% 66% 67% 66% 71% 70% 65% 68% 69% 69% 65% 71% 73% 69% 73% 60% 64% 70% Pas efficace / Not effective 19% 14% 22% 9% 18% 54% 41% 12% 14% 21% 12% 25% 50% 27% 10% 30% 12% 9% 15% 44% 34% 25% 29% 13% 8% 16% 20% 19% 22% 20% 19% 17% 16% 21% 18% 22% 18% 18% 19% 20% 22% 18% 18% 20% 13% 25% 18% 22% UE25 EU25 24642 BE 1047 CZ 1011 DK 1011 DE 1528 EE 1009 EL 1000 ES 1016 FR 1014 IE 1000 IT 1000 CY 502 LV 1049 LT 1002 LU 500 HU 1012 MT 500 NL 1000 AT 1012 PL 999 PT 1000 SI 1037 SK 1056 FI 1003 SE 1000 UK 1334 Sexe / Sex Homme / Male 11882 Femme / Female 12760 Age 15-24 3758 25-39 6538 40-54 6299 55 + 8047 Age de fin d'études / Education (End of) 15 5879 16-19 9871 20+ 5753 Tjs étudiant / Still Studying 2560 Composition du ménage / Household composition 1 4662 2 7495 3 4865 4+ 7619 Echelle d'occupation du répondant / Respondant occupation scale Indépendants / Self- employed 1937 Cadres directeurs / Managers 2320 Autres employés / Other white collars 2622 Ouvriers / Manual workers 4743 Femmes- hommes au foyer / House person 2519 Chômeurs / Unemployed 1758 Retraités / Retired 6184 Etudiants / Students 2560 QD3.4 Pour chacune de ces options, pensez-vous que les mesures actuellement entreprises en (NOTRE PAYS) sont très efficaces, plutôt efficaces, pas très efficaces ou pas du tout efficaces ? QD3.4 For each of these options, do you feel that the measures currently being undertaken in (OUR COUNTRY) are very effective, fairly effective, not very effective or not at all effective? Traiter ceux qui ont le SIDA et prendre soin d'eux Treating those who has AIDS and looking after them TOTAL Urbanisation subjective / Subjective urbanisation Village rural / Rural village 8632 Petite moyenne ville / Small/ mid size town 9822 Grande ville / Large town 6159 Très efficace / Very effective 21% 25% 20% Assez efficace / Fairly effective 47% 45% 46% Peu efficace / Not very effective 15% 17% 18% Pas du tout efficace / Not at all effective 3% 2% 3% NSP / DK Efficace / Effective Pas efficace / Not effective 18% 19% 21% 14% 12% 13% 68% 70% 66% QD3.5 Pour chacune de ces options, pensez-vous que les mesures actuellement entreprises en (NOTRE PAYS) sont très efficaces, plutôt efficaces, pas très efficaces ou pas du tout efficaces ? QD3.5 For each of these options, do you feel that the measures currently being undertaken in (OUR COUNTRY) are very effective, fairly effective, not very effective or not at all effective? Placer de l'argent dans la recherche pour trouver un vaccin contre le SIDA Funding research to find an AIDS vaccine TOTAL Très efficace / Very effective 23% 32% 14% 25% 25% 3% 21% 30% 25% 14% 38% 26% 3% 21% 41% 16% 22% 34% 33% 7% 15% 7% 25% 8% 34% 12% 23% 24% 26% 23% 23% 23% 23% 22% 24% 26% 21% 24% 23% 24% 22% 21% 24% 24% 26% 22% 22% 26% Assez efficace / Fairly effective 36% 38% 40% 40% 33% 17% 18% 39% 38% 27% 42% 23% 16% 28% 32% 31% 27% 44% 36% 25% 30% 28% 34% 48% 35% 40% 36% 36% 37% 36% 35% 37% 37% 36% 35% 36% 35% 36% 37% 36% 34% 36% 38% 36% 39% 33% 36% 36% Peu efficace / Not very effective 21% 22% 26% 16% 22% 39% 30% 15% 26% 20% 11% 21% 38% 22% 10% 29% 16% 10% 15% 33% 33% 37% 22% 30% 14% 20% 23% 20% 22% 23% 22% 18% 18% 22% 23% 23% 20% 20% 22% 22% 24% 25% 21% 23% 15% 22% 19% 23% Pas du tout efficace / Not at all effective 6% 4% 3% 3% 4% 16% 16% 4% 6% 8% 4% 8% 16% 10% 3% 8% 11% 1% 4% 15% 8% 14% 9% 3% 3% 4% 7% 5% 6% 7% 6% 4% 4% 7% 6% 5% 5% 6% 6% 6% 8% 7% 6% 6% 4% 8% 5% 5% NSP / DK 14% 4% 17% 16% 15% 25% 15% 13% 5% 31% 5% 23% 27% 19% 13% 16% 24% 10% 12% 19% 14% 14% 10% 12% 15% 24% 12% 15% 9% 11% 13% 18% 17% 13% 12% 10% 17% 14% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 10% 15% 14% 19% 10% Efficace / Effective 60% 70% 54% 65% 58% 20% 39% 69% 63% 41% 80% 49% 19% 49% 73% 47% 49% 78% 69% 33% 45% 36% 59% 55% 69% 52% 59% 60% 62% 59% 59% 59% 61% 58% 59% 62% 57% 60% 60% 60% 56% 56% 62% 60% 65% 55% 58% 62% Pas efficace / Not effective 27% 26% 29% 19% 27% 55% 46% 18% 32% 28% 15% 28% 54% 32% 14% 37% 27% 11% 19% 48% 40% 51% 31% 33% 17% 24% 29% 25% 28% 30% 29% 22% 22% 29% 29% 28% 26% 26% 28% 28% 32% 32% 26% 30% 19% 30% 23% 28% UE25 EU25 24642 BE 1047 CZ 1011 DK 1011 DE 1528 EE 1009 EL 1000 ES 1016 FR 1014 IE 1000 IT 1000 CY 502 LV 1049 LT 1002 LU 500 HU 1012 MT 500 NL 1000 AT 1012 PL 999 PT 1000 SI 1037 SK 1056 FI 1003 SE 1000 UK 1334 Sexe / Sex Homme / Male 11882 Femme / Female 12760 Age 15-24 3758 25-39 6538 40-54 6299 55 + 8047 Age de fin d'études / Education (End of) 15 5879 16-19 9871 20+ 5753 Tjs étudiant / Still Studying 2560 Composition du ménage / Household composition 1 4662 2 7495 3 4865 4+ 7619 Echelle d'occupation du répondant / Respondant occupation scale Indépendants / Self- employed 1937 Cadres directeurs / Managers 2320 Autres employés / Other white collars 2622 Ouvriers / Manual workers 4743 Femmes- hommes au foyer / House person 2519 Chômeurs / Unemployed 1758 Retraités / Retired 6184 Etudiants / Students 2560 QD3.5 Pour chacune de ces options, pensez-vous que les mesures actuellement entreprises en (NOTRE PAYS) sont très efficaces, plutôt efficaces, pas très efficaces ou pas du tout efficaces ? QD3.5 For each of these options, do you feel that the measures currently being undertaken in (OUR COUNTRY) are very effective, fairly effective, not very effective or not at all effective? Placer de l'argent dans la recherche pour trouver un vaccin contre le SIDA Funding research to find an AIDS vaccine TOTAL Urbanisation subjective / Subjective urbanisation Village rural / Rural village 8632 Petite moyenne ville / Small/ mid size town 9822 Grande ville / Large town 6159 Très efficace / Very effective 23% 26% 21% Assez efficace / Fairly effective 36% 37% 36% Peu efficace / Not very effective 21% 21% 22% Pas du tout efficace / Not at all effective 5% 5% 7% NSP / DK Efficace / Effective Pas efficace / Not effective 26% 26% 30% 15% 12% 14% 59% 62% 56% QD4.1 Regardons cette même liste de mesures possibles. Pour chacune d'elles, pensez-vous qu'il soit utile ou non de collaborer et d'harmoniser les efforts au sein de l'Union européenne ? QD4.1 Let us look at this same list of possible measures. For each of them do you think it is useful or not to collaborate and to harmonise efforts within the European Union? Une campagne d'information sur les types de comportement qui exposent les gens à l'infection par le virus du SIDA An information campaign on the types of behaviour which expose people to infection by the AIDS virus TOTAL Très utile / Very useful 54% 65% 43% 44% 60% 54% 73% 53% 62% 54% 54% 79% 58% 50% 62% 51% 68% 67% 51% 42% 48% 66% 37% 56% 49% 43% 52% 55% 53% 55% 56% 51% 49% 54% 58% 56% 51% 54% 56% 54% 54% 57% 55% 55% 54% 52% 50% 56% Plutôt utile / Fairly useful 34% 29% 45% 33% 28% 32% 23% 37% 32% 32% 39% 18% 31% 36% 34% 35% 24% 24% 35% 40% 47% 27% 47% 37% 34% 37% 36% 33% 38% 34% 33% 34% 36% 34% 32% 36% 33% 34% 34% 36% 35% 33% 36% 34% 33% 36% 35% 36% Plutôt pas utile / Not very useful 5% 4% 7% 12% 5% 4% 2% 4% 3% 2% 4% 2% 3% 3% 3% 5% 2% 6% 7% 8% 3% 2% 13% 4% 11% 7% 6% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 6% 5% 6% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 6% 6% 5% 5% 5% Pas du tout utile / Not at all useful 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% NSP / DK 6% 0% 5% 10% 7% 9% 2% 6% 2% 12% 2% 1% 8% 11% 1% 8% 6% 2% 6% 9% 2% 5% 3% 2% 5% 12% 5% 6% 3% 4% 5% 9% 9% 6% 3% 3% 9% 6% 5% 5% 4% 4% 3% 4% 7% 6% 10% 3% Utile / Useful 88% 94% 87% 77% 88% 86% 96% 90% 94% 86% 93% 97% 89% 86% 96% 86% 91% 91% 86% 82% 94% 93% 84% 93% 83% 80% 88% 88% 91% 90% 89% 85% 85% 89% 90% 92% 84% 88% 90% 90% 90% 90% 91% 89% 86% 88% 84% 92% Pas utile / Not useful 6% 6% 8% 13% 6% 5% 2% 4% 4% 3% 5% 2% 3% 3% 3% 6% 3% 7% 8% 9% 3% 2% 13% 5% 13% 8% 7% 5% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 7% 6% 8% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 7% 6% 6% 6% UE25 EU25 24642 BE 1047 CZ 1011 DK 1011 DE 1528 EE 1009 EL 1000 ES 1016 FR 1014 IE 1000 IT 1000 CY 502 LV 1049 LT 1002 LU 500 HU 1012 MT 500 NL 1000 AT 1012 PL 999 PT 1000 SI 1037 SK 1056 FI 1003 SE 1000 UK 1334 Sexe / Sex Homme / Male 11882 Femme / Female 12760 Age 15-24 3758 25-39 6538 40-54 6299 55 + 8047 Age de fin d'études / Education (End of) 15 5879 16-19 9871 20+ 5753 Tjs étudiant / Still Studying 2560 Composition du ménage / Household composition 1 4662 2 7495 3 4865 4+ 7619 Echelle d'occupation du répondant / Respondant occupation scale Indépendants / Self- employed 1937 Cadres directeurs / Managers 2320 Autres employés / Other white collars 2622 Ouvriers / Manual workers 4743 Femmes- hommes au foyer / House person 2519 Chômeurs / Unemployed 1758 Retraités / Retired 6184 Etudiants / Students 2560 QD4.1 Regardons cette même liste de mesures possibles. Pour chacune d'elles, pensez-vous qu'il soit utile ou non de collaborer et d'harmoniser les efforts au sein de l'Union européenne ? QD4.1 Let us look at this same list of possible measures. For each of them do you think it is useful or not to collaborate and to harmonise efforts within the European Union? Une campagne d'information sur les types de comportement qui exposent les gens à l'infection par le virus du SIDA An information campaign on the types of behaviour which expose people to infection by the AIDS virus TOTAL Urbanisation subjective / Subjective urbanisation Village rural / Rural village 8632 Petite moyenne ville / Small/ mid size town 9822 Grande ville / Large town 6159 Très utile / Very useful 52% 56% 52% Plutôt utile / Fairly useful 35% 33% 35% Plutôt pas utile / Not very useful 5% 5% 6% Pas du tout utile / Not at all useful 1% 1% 1% NSP / DK 7% 5% 5% Utile / Useful 87% 90% 88% Pas utile / Not useful 6% 5% 7% QD4.2 Regardons cette même liste de mesures possibles. Pour chacune d'elles, pensez-vous qu'il soit utile ou non de collaborer et d'harmoniser les efforts au sein de l'Union européenne ? QD4.2 Let us look at this same list of possible measures. For each of them do you think it is useful or not to collaborate and to harmonise efforts within the European Union? Essayer davantage d'identifier les personnes qui sont séropositives ou qui ont le SIDA Try harder to identify the people who are HIV positive or who have AIDS TOTAL Très utile / Very useful 45% 46% 42% 30% 47% 54% 76% 41% 48% 52% 38% 76% 57% 56% 55% 55% 57% 49% 47% 39% 50% 66% 37% 54% 48% 43% 45% 46% 45% 44% 45% 46% 43% 46% 46% 47% 45% 46% 46% 44% 46% 45% 45% 44% 45% 46% 45% 47% Plutôt utile / Fairly useful 36% 32% 43% 34% 32% 31% 19% 35% 34% 29% 43% 20% 30% 32% 32% 33% 26% 32% 33% 43% 41% 26% 43% 39% 35% 36% 37% 35% 36% 36% 36% 36% 38% 36% 34% 35% 35% 35% 36% 37% 36% 34% 39% 38% 34% 35% 35% 35% Plutôt pas utile / Not very useful 8% 13% 8% 18% 10% 3% 3% 7% 8% 4% 8% 2% 4% 2% 8% 3% 6% 12% 10% 6% 5% 3% 14% 5% 9% 6% 9% 7% 10% 9% 8% 6% 6% 7% 10% 10% 7% 7% 8% 9% 9% 10% 8% 8% 7% 8% 6% 10% Pas du tout utile / Not at all useful 3% 8% 1% 5% 4% 1% 0% 6% 6% 1% 5% 0% 1% 0% 3% 1% 1% 3% 2% 1% 1% 0% 2% 0% 2% 1% 3% 4% 3% 5% 4% 2% 3% 3% 5% 4% 4% 3% 3% 4% 5% 3% 4% 4% 4% 3% 2% 4% NSP / DK 8% 1% 6% 14% 8% 10% 2% 12% 4% 13% 5% 2% 9% 10% 3% 8% 9% 4% 8% 10% 3% 4% 4% 2% 6% 13% 7% 8% 5% 6% 7% 11% 10% 7% 6% 4% 10% 8% 7% 6% 5% 7% 6% 6% 10% 8% 11% 4% Utile / Useful 81% 78% 85% 64% 79% 86% 95% 76% 83% 81% 81% 96% 87% 88% 87% 88% 83% 81% 80% 82% 92% 93% 81% 92% 83% 79% 81% 81% 82% 80% 81% 81% 81% 82% 80% 81% 80% 81% 82% 81% 82% 79% 83% 82% 79% 81% 81% 81% Pas utile / Not useful 11% 21% 9% 22% 14% 4% 3% 12% 14% 6% 14% 2% 4% 2% 11% 4% 7% 15% 12% 8% 5% 3% 16% 5% 10% 7% 12% 11% 13% 14% 12% 8% 9% 10% 14% 14% 11% 11% 11% 12% 14% 14% 11% 12% 11% 11% 8% 14% UE25 EU25 24642 BE 1047 CZ 1011 DK 1011 DE 1528 EE 1009 EL 1000 ES 1016 FR 1014 IE 1000 IT 1000 CY 502 LV 1049 LT 1002 LU 500 HU 1012 MT 500 NL 1000 AT 1012 PL 999 PT 1000 SI 1037 SK 1056 FI 1003 SE 1000 UK 1334 Sexe / Sex Homme / Male 11882 Femme / Female 12760 Age 15-24 3758 25-39 6538 40-54 6299 55 + 8047 Age de fin d'études / Education (End of) 15 5879 16-19 9871 20+ 5753 Tjs étudiant / Still Studying 2560 Composition du ménage / Household composition 1 4662 2 7495 3 4865 4+ 7619 Echelle d'occupation du répondant / Respondant occupation scale Indépendants / Self- employed 1937 Cadres directeurs / Managers 2320 Autres employés / Other white collars 2622 Ouvriers / Manual workers 4743 Femmes- hommes au foyer / House person 2519 Chômeurs / Unemployed 1758 Retraités / Retired 6184 Etudiants / Students 2560 QD4.2 Regardons cette même liste de mesures possibles. Pour chacune d'elles, pensez-vous qu'il soit utile ou non de collaborer et d'harmoniser les efforts au sein de l'Union européenne ? QD4.2 Let us look at this same list of possible measures. For each of them do you think it is useful or not to collaborate and to harmonise efforts within the European Union? Essayer davantage d'identifier les personnes qui sont séropositives ou qui ont le SIDA Try harder to identify the people who are HIV positive or who have AIDS TOTAL Urbanisation subjective / Subjective urbanisation Village rural / Rural village 8632 Petite moyenne ville / Small/ mid size town 9822 Grande ville / Large town 6159 Très utile / Very useful 44% 46% 46% Plutôt utile / Fairly useful 36% 35% 36% Plutôt pas utile / Not very useful 7% 8% 8% Pas du tout utile / Not at all useful 4% 3% 3% NSP / DK 9% 7% 6% Utile / Useful 80% 81% 82% Pas utile / Not useful 11% 11% 11% QD4.3 Regardons cette même liste de mesures possibles. Pour chacune d'elles, pensez-vous qu'il soit utile ou non de collaborer et d'harmoniser les efforts au sein de l'Union européenne ? QD4.3 Let us look at this same list of possible measures. For each of them do you think it is useful or not to collaborate and to harmonise efforts within the European Union? Traiter les personnes séropositives pour retarder le déclenchement de la maladie Treating those who are HIV positive to delay the onset of AIDS TOTAL Très utile / Very useful 55% 68% 44% 50% 58% 55% 79% 47% 66% 60% 54% 80% 62% 54% 68% 55% 66% 65% 52% 41% 59% 66% 45% 57% 59% 46% 54% 56% 56% 55% 57% 52% 50% 55% 60% 57% 52% 55% 57% 55% 57% 59% 55% 56% 55% 54% 51% 57% Plutôt utile / Fairly useful 34% 28% 44% 32% 30% 31% 17% 35% 30% 24% 39% 17% 28% 33% 29% 34% 22% 27% 34% 41% 36% 27% 41% 36% 30% 36% 35% 33% 35% 34% 32% 34% 36% 34% 30% 34% 34% 33% 33% 35% 34% 31% 36% 34% 32% 32% 35% 34% Plutôt pas utile / Not very useful 4% 3% 6% 7% 4% 5% 2% 6% 1% 3% 4% 1% 3% 2% 1% 4% 4% 4% 7% 6% 3% 2% 11% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% 4% 4% 3% 4% 4% 6% 4% 4% 4% 5% 3% 4% 4% 4% 4% 5% 4% 6% Pas du tout utile / Not at all useful 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 4% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% NSP / DK 6% 1% 6% 11% 7% 9% 2% 9% 2% 12% 3% 2% 7% 10% 2% 7% 7% 4% 6% 10% 3% 5% 3% 3% 5% 13% 6% 7% 3% 5% 6% 9% 10% 6% 4% 3% 9% 7% 6% 5% 4% 4% 4% 5% 9% 6% 10% 3% Utile / Useful 88% 96% 88% 82% 88% 86% 96% 82% 97% 84% 93% 97% 89% 87% 97% 89% 88% 91% 86% 82% 95% 93% 86% 92% 90% 82% 89% 88% 91% 89% 89% 86% 86% 89% 91% 90% 86% 88% 90% 89% 91% 91% 91% 90% 86% 87% 85% 90% Pas utile / Not useful 5% 4% 7% 8% 5% 6% 2% 10% 2% 4% 4% 2% 3% 3% 1% 4% 5% 5% 8% 8% 3% 2% 11% 5% 6% 5% 6% 5% 6% 6% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 7% 5% 5% 5% 6% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 7% 5% 7% UE25 EU25 24642 BE 1047 CZ 1011 DK 1011 DE 1528 EE 1009 EL 1000 ES 1016 FR 1014 IE 1000 IT 1000 CY 502 LV 1049 LT 1002 LU 500 HU 1012 MT 500 NL 1000 AT 1012 PL 999 PT 1000 SI 1037 SK 1056 FI 1003 SE 1000 UK 1334 Sexe / Sex Homme / Male 11882 Femme / Female 12760 Age 15-24 3758 25-39 6538 40-54 6299 55 + 8047 Age de fin d'études / Education (End of) 15 5879 16-19 9871 20+ 5753 Tjs étudiant / Still Studying 2560 Composition du ménage / Household composition 1 4662 2 7495 3 4865 4+ 7619 Echelle d'occupation du répondant / Respondant occupation scale Indépendants / Self- employed 1937 Cadres directeurs / Managers 2320 Autres employés / Other white collars 2622 Ouvriers / Manual workers 4743 Femmes- hommes au foyer / House person 2519 Chômeurs / Unemployed 1758 Retraités / Retired 6184 Etudiants / Students 2560 QD4.3 Regardons cette même liste de mesures possibles. Pour chacune d'elles, pensez-vous qu'il soit utile ou non de collaborer et d'harmoniser les efforts au sein de l'Union européenne ? QD4.3 Let us look at this same list of possible measures. For each of them do you think it is useful or not to collaborate and to harmonise efforts within the European Union? Traiter les personnes séropositives pour retarder le déclenchement de la maladie Treating those who are HIV positive to delay the onset of AIDS TOTAL Urbanisation subjective / Subjective urbanisation Village rural / Rural village 8632 Petite moyenne ville / Small/ mid size town 9822 Grande ville / Large town 6159 Très utile / Very useful 53% 57% 53% Plutôt utile / Fairly useful 34% 32% 35% Plutôt pas utile / Not very useful 4% 4% 4% Pas du tout utile / Not at all useful 1% 1% 1% NSP / DK 8% 6% 6% Utile / Useful 87% 89% 89% Pas utile / Not useful 5% 5% 6% QD4.4 Regardons cette même liste de mesures possibles. Pour chacune d'elles, pensez-vous qu'il soit utile ou non de collaborer et d'harmoniser les efforts au sein de l'Union européenne ? QD4.4 Let us look at this same list of possible measures. For each of them do you think it is useful or not to collaborate and to harmonise efforts within the European Union? Traiter ceux qui ont le SIDA et prendre soin d'eux Treating those who has AIDS and looking after them TOTAL Très utile / Very useful 55% 71% 41% 42% 55% 53% 79% 53% 71% 60% 55% 80% 61% 55% 71% 57% 69% 63% 49% 41% 59% 68% 43% 57% 62% 45% 54% 57% 57% 56% 57% 53% 51% 55% 59% 58% 53% 56% 56% 56% 58% 58% 56% 55% 57% 56% 51% 58% Plutôt utile / Fairly useful 34% 25% 46% 35% 32% 34% 17% 38% 27% 25% 38% 17% 28% 32% 27% 33% 22% 28% 38% 42% 37% 26% 42% 36% 28% 37% 36% 33% 36% 35% 34% 34% 35% 35% 31% 34% 34% 34% 35% 35% 34% 33% 37% 36% 31% 33% 34% 34% Plutôt pas utile / Not very useful 4% 3% 6% 10% 5% 4% 1% 2% 1% 3% 3% 1% 3% 2% 1% 4% 2% 5% 6% 7% 2% 2% 11% 4% 5% 5% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 5% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 4% 3% 4% 4% 5% Pas du tout utile / Not at all useful 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% NSP / DK 6% 0% 5% 12% 7% 8% 2% 6% 1% 12% 3% 2% 8% 10% 1% 6% 6% 2% 7% 8% 2% 5% 3% 3% 4% 12% 5% 6% 3% 5% 5% 9% 9% 6% 4% 3% 8% 6% 5% 5% 3% 5% 4% 5% 8% 6% 9% 3% Utile / Useful 89% 96% 87% 77% 87% 88% 97% 92% 97% 85% 93% 98% 88% 87% 98% 89% 92% 91% 86% 83% 96% 94% 85% 93% 90% 82% 90% 89% 92% 90% 90% 87% 87% 90% 91% 92% 87% 89% 91% 91% 92% 91% 93% 91% 88% 89% 86% 92% Pas utile / Not useful 5% 4% 7% 11% 6% 4% 1% 3% 1% 3% 3% 1% 3% 3% 1% 5% 2% 6% 7% 9% 2% 2% 11% 4% 6% 6% 5% 4% 5% 5% 5% 5% 4% 4% 5% 5% 5% 4% 4% 5% 5% 5% 3% 5% 4% 5% 5% 5% UE25 EU25 24642 BE 1047 CZ 1011 DK 1011 DE 1528 EE 1009 EL 1000 ES 1016 FR 1014 IE 1000 IT 1000 CY 502 LV 1049 LT 1002 LU 500 HU 1012 MT 500 NL 1000 AT 1012 PL 999 PT 1000 SI 1037 SK 1056 FI 1003 SE 1000 UK 1334 Sexe / Sex Homme / Male 11882 Femme / Female 12760 Age 15-24 3758 25-39 6538 40-54 6299 55 + 8047 Age de fin d'études / Education (End of) 15 5879 16-19 9871 20+ 5753 Tjs étudiant / Still Studying 2560 Composition du ménage / Household composition 1 4662 2 7495 3 4865 4+ 7619 Echelle d'occupation du répondant / Respondant occupation scale Indépendants / Self- employed 1937 Cadres directeurs / Managers 2320 Autres employés / Other white collars 2622 Ouvriers / Manual workers 4743 Femmes- hommes au foyer / House person 2519 Chômeurs / Unemployed 1758 Retraités / Retired 6184 Etudiants / Students 2560 QD4.4 Regardons cette même liste de mesures possibles. Pour chacune d'elles, pensez-vous qu'il soit utile ou non de collaborer et d'harmoniser les efforts au sein de l'Union européenne ? QD4.4 Let us look at this same list of possible measures. For each of them do you think it is useful or not to collaborate and to harmonise efforts within the European Union? Traiter ceux qui ont le SIDA et prendre soin d'eux Treating those who has AIDS and looking after them TOTAL Urbanisation subjective / Subjective urbanisation Village rural / Rural village 8632 Petite moyenne ville / Small/ mid size town 9822 Grande ville / Large town 6159 Très utile / Very useful 53% 58% 53% Plutôt utile / Fairly useful 35% 32% 37% Plutôt pas utile / Not very useful 4% 4% 4% Pas du tout utile / Not at all useful 1% 1% 1% NSP / DK 7% 5% 6% Utile / Useful 88% 91% 90% Pas utile / Not useful 5% 4% 5% QD4.5 Regardons cette même liste de mesures possibles. Pour chacune d'elles, pensez-vous qu'il soit utile ou non de collaborer et d'harmoniser les efforts au sein de l'Union européenne ? QD4.5 Let us look at this same list of possible measures. For each of them do you think it is useful or not to collaborate and to harmonise efforts within the European Union? Placer de l'argent dans la recherche pour trouver un vaccin contre le SIDA Funding research to find an AIDS vaccine TOTAL Très utile / Very useful 61% 73% 53% 59% 67% 61% 83% 59% 69% 63% 57% 83% 65% 57% 74% 66% 63% 80% 58% 46% 61% 69% 53% 65% 77% 51% 61% 62% 65% 64% 61% 58% 55% 61% 67% 67% 60% 61% 64% 61% 61% 67% 64% 61% 60% 62% 57% 67% Plutôt utile / Fairly useful 28% 24% 37% 23% 22% 27% 13% 34% 26% 21% 35% 14% 25% 30% 24% 24% 23% 16% 29% 38% 34% 24% 33% 29% 17% 30% 29% 28% 28% 27% 29% 29% 32% 29% 24% 27% 27% 29% 27% 30% 30% 25% 28% 30% 28% 27% 29% 27% Plutôt pas utile / Not very useful 3% 2% 4% 5% 3% 4% 2% 3% 3% 3% 3% 1% 2% 2% 1% 3% 2% 2% 5% 6% 2% 2% 8% 3% 3% 5% 4% 3% 3% 4% 4% 3% 3% 4% 3% 3% 4% 3% 4% 3% 4% 2% 4% 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% Pas du tout utile / Not at all useful 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 2% 0% 1% 2% 0% 2% 0% 0% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% NSP / DK 6% 0% 5% 11% 7% 8% 2% 5% 2% 13% 3% 2% 8% 11% 1% 6% 11% 2% 7% 9% 3% 5% 4% 3% 4% 12% 5% 6% 3% 5% 5% 8% 9% 6% 4% 3% 8% 6% 5% 5% 3% 5% 4% 5% 8% 5% 9% 3% Utile / Useful 90% 97% 90% 82% 89% 87% 96% 92% 94% 84% 92% 97% 89% 87% 98% 91% 86% 96% 88% 83% 95% 93% 86% 94% 93% 82% 90% 90% 93% 91% 90% 87% 87% 90% 92% 93% 87% 90% 91% 91% 91% 93% 92% 91% 88% 89% 86% 93% Pas utile / Not useful 4% 3% 5% 7% 4% 4% 2% 3% 4% 3% 5% 1% 3% 2% 1% 4% 3% 2% 6% 8% 2% 2% 10% 3% 3% 6% 5% 4% 4% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% 4% 4% 5% 4% 4% 4% 6% 3% 4% 5% 4% 6% 5% 4% UE25 EU25 24642 BE 1047 CZ 1011 DK 1011 DE 1528 EE 1009 EL 1000 ES 1016 FR 1014 IE 1000 IT 1000 CY 502 LV 1049 LT 1002 LU 500 HU 1012 MT 500 NL 1000 AT 1012 PL 999 PT 1000 SI 1037 SK 1056 FI 1003 SE 1000 UK 1334 Sexe / Sex Homme / Male 11882 Femme / Female 12760 Age 15-24 3758 25-39 6538 40-54 6299 55 + 8047 Age de fin d'études / Education (End of) 15 5879 16-19 9871 20+ 5753 Tjs étudiant / Still Studying 2560 Composition du ménage / Household composition 1 4662 2 7495 3 4865 4+ 7619 Echelle d'occupation du répondant / Respondant occupation scale Indépendants / Self- employed 1937 Cadres directeurs / Managers 2320 Autres employés / Other white collars 2622 Ouvriers / Manual workers 4743 Femmes- hommes au foyer / House person 2519 Chômeurs / Unemployed 1758 Retraités / Retired 6184 Etudiants / Students 2560 QD4.5 Regardons cette même liste de mesures possibles. Pour chacune d'elles, pensez-vous qu'il soit utile ou non de collaborer et d'harmoniser les efforts au sein de l'Union européenne ? QD4.5 Let us look at this same list of possible measures. For each of them do you think it is useful or not to collaborate and to harmonise efforts within the European Union? Placer de l'argent dans la recherche pour trouver un vaccin contre le SIDA Funding research to find an AIDS vaccine TOTAL Urbanisation subjective / Subjective urbanisation Village rural / Rural village 8632 Petite moyenne ville / Small/ mid size tow 9822 Grande ville / Large town 6159 Très utile / Very useful 59% 63% 62% Plutôt utile / Fairly useful 29% 28% 28% Plutôt pas utile / Not very useful 4% 3% 4% Pas du tout utile / Not at all useful 1% 1% 1% NSP / DK 7% 5% 5% Utile / Useful 88% 91% 90% Pas utile / Not useful 5% 4% 4% Technical note and data tables Acceding and candidate countries and the non government controlled areas of Cyprus SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER N°240 (2) TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Between the 5th of November and the 7th of December 2005, TNS Opinion & Social, a consortium created between Taylor Nelson Sofres and EOS Gallup Europe, carried out wave 64.3 of the EUROBAROMETER, on request of the EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Directorate-General Press and Communication, Opinion Polls. The SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER N°240 (2) is part of wave 64.3 and has been conducted in the two acceding countries (Bulgaria and Romania) and in the two candidate countries (Croatia and Turkey) and in the Turkish Cypriot Community. The survey covers the national population of citizens of the respective nationalities and the population of citizens of all the European Union Member States that are residents in those countries and have a sufficient command of one of the respective national language(s) to answer the questionnaire. The basic sample design applied in all states is a multistage, random (probability) one. In each country, a number of sampling points was drawn with probability proportional to population size (for a total coverage of the country) and to population density. In order to do so, the sampling points were drawn systematically from each of the "administrative regional units", after stratification by individual unit and type of area. They thus represent the whole territory of the countries surveyed according to the EUROSTAT NUTS II (or equivalent) and according to the distribution of the resident population of the respective nationalities in terms of metropolitan, urban and rural areas. In each of the selected sampling points, a starting address was drawn, at random. Further addresses (every Nth address) were selected by standard "random route" procedures, from the initial address. In each household, the respondent was drawn, at random (following the "closest birthday rule"). All interviews were conducted face-to-face in people's homes and in the appropriate national language. As far as the data capture is concerned, CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interview) was used in those countries where this technique was available. “AIDS prevention” ABREVIATIONS BG HR RO TR CY(tcc) TOTAL COUNTRIES Bulgaria Croatia Romania Turkey Turkish Cypriot Comm. INSTITUTES TNS BBSS Puls TNS CSOP TNS PIAR KADEM N° INTERVIEWS 1.004 1.000 1.002 1.005 500 4.511 FIELDWORK DATES 07/11/2005 21/11/2005 08/11/2005 05/12/2005 12/11/2005 04/12/2005 07/11/2005 05/12/2005 09/11/2005 26/11/2005 07/11/2005 05/12/2005 POPULATION 15+ 6.695.512 3.682.826 18.145.036 47.583.830 157.101 76.264.305 For each country a comparison between the sample and the universe was carried out. The Universe description was derived from Eurostat population data or from national statistics offices. For all countries surveyed, a national weighting procedure, using marginal and intercellular weighting, was carried out based on this Universe description. In all countries, gender, age, region and size of locality were introduced in the iteration procedure. For international weighting (i.e. EU averages), TNS Opinion & Social applies the official population figures as provided by EUROSTAT or national statistic offices. The total population figures for input in this post-weighting procedure are listed above. Readers are reminded that survey results are estimations, the accuracy of which, everything being equal, rests upon the sample size and upon the observed percentage. With samples of about 1,000 interviews, the real percentages vary within the following confidence limits: Observed percentages Confidence limits 10% or 90% ± 1.9 points 20% or 80% ± 2.5 points 30% or 70% ± 2.7 points 40% or 60% ± 3.0 points 50% ± 3.1 points QF1.1 Selon vous, le SIDA peut-il être attrapé de chacune des façons suivantes ? QF1.1 In your opinion, can AIDS be caught by each of the following ways? En mangeant un repas préparé par un malade du SIDA ou une personne séropositive Eating a meal prepared by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive TOTAL BG HR RO TR CY (tcc) 1004 1000 1002 1005 500 Oui / Yes 7% 8% 5% 10% 12% Peut-être / Possibly 22% 11% 18% 6% 9% Non / No 51% 71% 61% 62% 66% NSP / DK 20% 10% 16% 22% 13% QF1.2 Selon vous, le SIDA peut-il être attrapé de chacune des façons suivantes ? QF1.2 In your opinion, can AIDS be caught by each of the following ways? En manipulant des objets qu'a touché un malade du SIDA ou une personne séropositive Handling objects touched by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive TOTAL BG HR RO TR CY (tcc) 1004 1000 1002 1005 500 Oui / Yes 7% 7% 4% 8% 11% Peut-être / Possibly 17% 12% 17% 9% 9% Non / No 59% 72% 63% 62% 67% NSP / DK 17% 9% 16% 21% 13% QF1.3 Selon vous, le SIDA peut-il être attrapé de chacune des façons suivantes ? QF1.3 In your opinion, can AIDS be caught by each of the following ways? En buvant dans un verre que vient d'utiliser un malade du SIDA ou une personne séropositive Drinking from a glass which has just been used by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive TOTAL BG HR RO TR CY (tcc) 1004 1000 1002 1005 500 Oui / Yes 16% 22% 12% 12% 20% Peut-être / Possibly 33% 24% 27% 17% 20% Non / No 31% 44% 44% 48% 45% NSP / DK 20% 10% 17% 22% 14% QF1.4 Selon vous, le SIDA peut-il être attrapé de chacune des façons suivantes ? QF1.4 In your opinion, can AIDS be caught by each of the following ways? En s'asseyant sur un siège de toilette qui vient d'être utilisé par un malade du SIDA ou une personne séropositive Sitting on a toilet seat which has been used by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive TOTAL BG HR RO TR CY (tcc) 1004 1000 1002 1005 500 Oui / Yes 15% 20% 10% 17% 26% Peut-être / Possibly 33% 23% 28% 16% 18% Non / No 29% 46% 43% 44% 42% NSP / DK 23% 11% 19% 23% 14% QF1.5 Selon vous, le SIDA peut-il être attrapé de chacune des façons suivantes ? QF1.5 In your opinion, can AIDS be caught by each of the following ways? En étant piqué(e) par une seringue qui vient de servir à un malade du SIDA ou une personne séropositive Being injected with a needle which has been used by someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive TOTAL BG HR RO TR CY (tcc) 1004 1000 1002 1005 500 Oui / Yes 85% 92% 90% 66% 80% Peut-être / Possibly 8% 2% 3% 10% 8% Non / No 1% 3% 1% 8% 5% NSP / DK 6% 4% 6% 16% 8% QF1.6 Selon vous, le SIDA peut-il être attrapé de chacune des façons suivantes ? QF1.6 In your opinion, can AIDS be caught by each of the following ways? En recevant du sang qui vient d'un malade du SIDA ou d'une personne séropositive Receiving blood from someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive TOTAL BG HR RO TR CY (tcc) 1004 1000 1002 1005 500 Oui / Yes 87% 92% 92% 74% 86% Peut-être / Possibly 7% 2% 1% 4% 5% Non / No 1% 3% 0% 7% 4% NSP / DK 5% 3% 7% 14% 5% QF1.7 Selon vous, le SIDA peut-il être attrapé de chacune des façons suivantes ? QF1.7 In your opinion, can AIDS be caught by each of the following ways? En serrant la main d'un malade du SIDA ou d'une personne séropositive Shaking hands with someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive TOTAL BG HR RO TR CY (tcc) 1004 1000 1002 1005 500 Oui / Yes 10% 8% 7% 9% 10% Peut-être / Possibly 17% 6% 13% 7% 12% Non / No 58% 79% 66% 66% 70% NSP / DK 15% 6% 14% 18% 9% QF1.8 Selon vous, le SIDA peut-il être attrapé de chacune des façons suivantes ? QF1.8 In your opinion, can AIDS be caught by each of the following ways? En embrassant sur la bouche un malade du SIDA ou une personne séropositive Kissing on the mouth someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive TOTAL BG HR RO TR CY (tcc) 1004 1000 1002 1005 500 Oui / Yes 31% 41% 25% 31% 35% Peut-être / Possibly 37% 27% 34% 21% 27% Non / No 12% 23% 23% 27% 28% NSP / DK 19% 9% 18% 22% 10% QF1.9 Selon vous, le SIDA peut-il être attrapé de chacune des façons suivantes ? QF1.9 In your opinion, can AIDS be caught by each of the following ways? En ayant des rapports sexuels sans protection avec un malade du SIDA ou une personne séropositive Having sex without protection with someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive TOTAL BG HR RO TR CY (tcc) 1004 1000 1002 1005 500 Oui / Yes 89% 91% 90% 78% 91% Peut-être / Possibly 5% 2% 3% 5% 2% Non / No 1% 2% 0% 4% 3% NSP / DK 5% 4% 6% 13% 3% QF1.10 Selon vous, le SIDA peut-il être attrapé de chacune des façons suivantes ? QF1.10 In your opinion, can AIDS be caught by each of the following ways? En soignant un malade du SIDA ou une personne séropositive Taking care of someone who has AIDS or who is HIV positive TOTAL BG HR RO TR CY (tcc) 1004 1000 1002 1005 500 Oui / Yes 16% 13% 9% 7% 17% Peut-être / Possibly 31% 13% 31% 7% 23% Non / No 34% 66% 45% 65% 47% NSP / DK 18% 9% 15% 20% 13% QF1.11 Selon vous, le SIDA peut-il être attrapé de chacune des façons suivantes ? QF1.11 In your opinion, can AIDS be caught by each of the following ways? En donnant du sang Giving blood TOTAL BG HR RO TR CY (tcc) 1004 1000 1002 1005 500 Oui / Yes 48% 37% 22% 14% 23% Peut-être / Possibly 26% 11% 15% 7% 11% Non / No 16% 41% 50% 61% 57% NSP / DK 10% 11% 13% 18% 9% QF2.1 L'émergence et la diffusion du SIDA vous ont-elles mené(e) personnellement à … ? QF2.1 Have the emergence and the spread of AIDS led you personally to…? Faire plus attention aux choses que vous touchez Taking more care over the things you touch TOTAL BG HR RO TR CY (tcc) 1004 1000 1002 1005 500 Oui / Yes 19% 14% 22% 14% 33% Peut-être / Possibly 14% 10% 19% 13% 13% Non / No 63% 72% 51% 59% 50% NSP / DK 4% 3% 8% 14% 5% QF2.2 L'émergence et la diffusion du SIDA vous ont-elles mené(e) personnellement à … ? QF2.2 Have the emergence and the spread of AIDS led you personally to…? Eviter certains endroits (régions\ établissements) Avoiding certain places (areas\ establishments) TOTAL BG HR RO TR CY (tcc) 1004 1000 1002 1005 500 Oui / Yes 14% 12% 19% 14% 34% Peut-être / Possibly 12% 9% 19% 12% 10% Non / No 69% 76% 53% 59% 50% NSP / DK 5% 4% 9% 15% 6% QF2.3 L'émergence et la diffusion du SIDA vous ont-elles mené(e) personnellement à … ? QF2.3 Have the emergence and the spread of AIDS led you personally to…? Chercher plus de stabilité dans votre choix de partenaires Seek more stability in your choice of partners TOTAL BG HR RO TR CY (tcc) 1004 1000 1002 1005 500 Oui / Yes 35% 33% 43% 23% 40% Peut-être / Possibly 10% 11% 14% 14% 12% Non / No 48% 48% 29% 46% 41% NSP / DK 6% 9% 15% 16% 7% QF2.4 L'émergence et la diffusion du SIDA vous ont-elles mené(e) personnellement à … ? QF2.4 Have the emergence and the spread of AIDS led you personally to…? Eviter la compagnie de certaines personnes\ sortes de gens Avoiding certain company\ types of people TOTAL BG HR RO TR CY (tcc) 1004 1000 1002 1005 500 Oui / Yes 18% 19% 25% 18% 31% Peut-être / Possibly 16% 11% 19% 19% 17% Non / No 61% 66% 47% 48% 47% NSP / DK 5% 5% 9% 15% 5% QF2.5 L'émergence et la diffusion du SIDA vous ont-elles mené(e) personnellement à … ? QF2.5 Have the emergence and the spread of AIDS led you personally to…? Prendre des précautions dans les relations sexuelles Take precautions in sexual intercourse TOTAL BG HR RO TR CY (tcc) 1004 1000 1002 1005 500 Oui / Yes 42% 38% 52% 37% 55% Peut-être / Possibly 9% 9% 9% 10% 10% Non / No 42% 45% 24% 38% 30% NSP / DK 7% 9% 15% 15% 5% QF3.1 Pour chacune de ces options, pensez-vous que les mesures actuellement entreprises en (NOTRE PAYS) sont très efficaces, plutôt efficaces, pas très efficaces ou pas du tout efficaces ? QF3.1 For each of these options, do you feel that the measures currently being undertaken in (OUR COUNTRY) are very effective, fairly effective, not very effective or not at all effective? Une campagne d'information sur les types de comportement qui exposent les gens à l'infection par le virus du SIDA An information campaign on the types of behaviour which expose people to infection by the AIDS virus TOTAL Très efficace / Very effective 14% 23% 47% 18% 18% Assez efficace / Fairly effective 44% 49% 30% 12% 17% Peu efficace / Not very effective 15% 11% 8% 12% 23% Pas du tout efficace / Not at all effective 7% 7% 1% 31% 30% NSP / DK Efficace / Effective Pas efficace / Not effective 22% 18% 9% 44% 52% BG HR RO TR CY (tcc) 1004 1000 1002 1005 500 21% 10% 14% 27% 13% 58% 72% 77% 30% 35% QF3.2 Pour chacune de ces options, pensez-vous que les mesures actuellement entreprises en (NOTRE PAYS) sont très efficaces, plutôt efficaces, pas très efficaces ou pas du tout efficaces ? QF3.2 For each of these options, do you feel that the measures currently being undertaken in (OUR COUNTRY) are very effective, fairly effective, not very effective or not at all effective? Essayer davantage d'identifier les personnes qui sont séropositives ou qui ont le SIDA Try harder to identify the people who are HIV positive or who have AIDS TOTAL Très efficace / Very effective 13% 22% 46% 13% 14% Assez efficace / Fairly effective 33% 38% 28% 13% 19% Peu efficace / Not very effective 15% 15% 10% 16% 20% Pas du tout efficace / Not at all effective 11% 10% 1% 30% 32% NSP / DK Efficace / Effective Pas efficace / Not effective 27% 25% 11% 46% 52% BG HR RO TR CY (tcc) 1004 1000 1002 1005 500 28% 15% 15% 27% 14% 46% 60% 74% 27% 33% QF3.3 Pour chacune de ces options, pensez-vous que les mesures actuellement entreprises en (NOTRE PAYS) sont très efficaces, plutôt efficaces, pas très efficaces ou pas du tout efficaces ? QF3.3 For each of these options, do you feel that the measures currently being undertaken in (OUR COUNTRY) are very effective, fairly effective, not very effective or not at all effective? Traiter les personnes séropositives pour retarder le déclenchement de la maladie Treating those who are HIV positive to delay the onset of AIDS TOTAL Très efficace / Very effective 16% 33% 51% 15% 13% Assez efficace / Fairly effective 30% 39% 24% 13% 18% Peu efficace / Not very effective 13% 10% 9% 15% 22% Pas du tout efficace / Not at all effective 8% 5% 2% 30% 31% NSP / DK Efficace / Effective Pas efficace / Not effective 20% 15% 11% 45% 53% BG HR RO TR CY (tcc) 1004 1000 1002 1005 500 34% 13% 14% 27% 17% 46% 72% 75% 28% 30% QF3.4 Pour chacune de ces options, pensez-vous que les mesures actuellement entreprises en (NOTRE PAYS) sont très efficaces, plutôt efficaces, pas très efficaces ou pas du tout efficaces ? QF3.4 For each of these options, do you feel that the measures currently being undertaken in (OUR COUNTRY) are very effective, fairly effective, not very effective or not at all effective? Traiter ceux qui ont le SIDA et prendre soin d'eux Treating those who has AIDS and looking after them TOTAL Très efficace / Very effective 16% 34% 51% 16% 16% Assez efficace / Fairly effective 31% 39% 24% 11% 19% Peu efficace / Not very effective 14% 9% 9% 16% 19% Pas du tout efficace / Not at all effective 7% 5% 2% 29% 29% NSP / DK Efficace / Effective Pas efficace / Not effective 20% 14% 11% 45% 48% BG HR RO TR CY (tcc) 1004 1000 1002 1005 500 32% 13% 13% 28% 17% 47% 73% 75% 27% 35% QF3.5 Pour chacune de ces options, pensez-vous que les mesures actuellement entreprises en (NOTRE PAYS) sont très efficaces, plutôt efficaces, pas très efficaces ou pas du tout efficaces ? QF3.5 For each of these options, do you feel that the measures currently being undertaken in (OUR COUNTRY) are very effective, fairly effective, not very effective or not at all effective? Placer de l'argent dans la recherche pour trouver un vaccin contre le SIDA Funding research to find an AIDS vaccine TOTAL Très efficace / Very effective 18% 36% 55% 19% 17% Assez efficace / Fairly effective 23% 28% 17% 9% 19% Peu efficace / Not very effective 11% 10% 9% 14% 18% Pas du tout efficace / Not at all effective 10% 11% 5% 30% 30% NSP / DK Efficace / Effective Pas efficace / Not effective 21% 22% 14% 44% 48% BG HR RO TR CY (tcc) 1004 1000 1002 1005 500 38% 15% 14% 28% 17% 41% 63% 72% 28% 36% QF4.1 Regardons cette même liste de mesures possibles. Pour chacune d'elles, pensez-vous qu'il soit utile ou non de collaborer et d'harmoniser les efforts au sein de l'Union européenne ? QF4.1 Let us look at this same list of possible measures. For each of them do you think it is useful or not to collaborate and to harmonise efforts within the European Union? Une campagne d'information sur les types de comportement qui exposent les gens à l'infection par le virus du SIDA An information campaign on the types of behaviour which expose people to infection by the AIDS virus TOTAL BG HR RO TR CY (tcc) 1004 1000 1002 1005 500 Très utile / Very useful 52% 62% 72% 36% 32% Plutôt utile / Fairly useful 27% 26% 21% 26% 36% Plutôt pas utile / Not very useful 4% 2% 0% 4% 7% Pas du tout utile / Not at all useful 1% 1% 0% 10% 4% NSP / DK 16% 8% 7% 25% 22% Utile / Useful 80% 88% 92% 62% 68% Pas utile / Not useful 4% 3% 1% 13% 10% QF4.2 Regardons cette même liste de mesures possibles. Pour chacune d'elles, pensez-vous qu'il soit utile ou non de collaborer et d'harmoniser les efforts au sein de l'Union européenne ? QF4.2 Let us look at this same list of possible measures. For each of them do you think it is useful or not to collaborate and to harmonise efforts within the European Union? Essayer davantage d'identifier les personnes qui sont séropositives ou qui ont le SIDA Try harder to identify the people who are HIV positive or who have AIDS TOTAL BG HR RO TR CY (tcc) 1004 1000 1002 1005 500 Très utile / Very useful 54% 53% 70% 34% 29% Plutôt utile / Fairly useful 26% 26% 21% 26% 38% Plutôt pas utile / Not very useful 3% 8% 2% 8% 6% Pas du tout utile / Not at all useful 0% 4% 0% 7% 4% NSP / DK 16% 9% 7% 25% 23% Utile / Useful 80% 79% 91% 60% 67% Pas utile / Not useful 4% 12% 2% 15% 10% QF4.3 Regardons cette même liste de mesures possibles. Pour chacune d'elles, pensez-vous qu'il soit utile ou non de collaborer et d'harmoniser les efforts au sein de l'Union européenne ? QF4.3 Let us look at this same list of possible measures. For each of them do you think it is useful or not to collaborate and to harmonise efforts within the European Union? Traiter les personnes séropositives pour retarder le déclenchement de la maladie Treating those who are HIV positive to delay the onset of AIDS TOTAL BG HR RO TR CY (tcc) 1004 1000 1002 1005 500 Très utile / Very useful 58% 65% 76% 35% 28% Plutôt utile / Fairly useful 21% 23% 16% 25% 35% Plutôt pas utile / Not very useful 4% 4% 1% 7% 8% Pas du tout utile / Not at all useful 1% 0% 0% 7% 5% NSP / DK 17% 8% 7% 26% 25% Utile / Useful 79% 88% 92% 60% 63% Pas utile / Not useful 5% 4% 1% 14% 13% QF4.4 Regardons cette même liste de mesures possibles. Pour chacune d'elles, pensez-vous qu'il soit utile ou non de collaborer et d'harmoniser les efforts au sein de l'Union européenne ? QF4.4 Let us look at this same list of possible measures. For each of them do you think it is useful or not to collaborate and to harmonise efforts within the European Union? Traiter ceux qui ont le SIDA et prendre soin d'eux Treating those who has AIDS and looking after them TOTAL BG HR RO TR CY (tcc) 1004 1000 1002 1005 500 Très utile / Very useful 59% 68% 76% 35% 32% Plutôt utile / Fairly useful 22% 20% 17% 24% 33% Plutôt pas utile / Not very useful 3% 3% 0% 8% 6% Pas du tout utile / Not at all useful 1% 1% 0% 7% 4% NSP / DK 15% 8% 7% 26% 25% Utile / Useful 81% 88% 93% 58% 66% Pas utile / Not useful 4% 3% 0% 15% 9% QF4.5 Regardons cette même liste de mesures possibles. Pour chacune d'elles, pensez-vous qu'il soit utile ou non de collaborer et d'harmoniser les efforts au sein de l'Union européenne ? QF4.5 Let us look at this same list of possible measures. For each of them do you think it is useful or not to collaborate and to harmonise efforts within the European Union? Placer de l'argent dans la recherche pour trouver un vaccin contre le SIDA Funding research to find an AIDS vaccine TOTAL BG HR RO TR CY (tcc) 1004 1000 1002 1005 500 Très utile / Very useful 64% 71% 80% 39% 35% Plutôt utile / Fairly useful 16% 17% 13% 23% 33% Plutôt pas utile / Not very useful 3% 3% 0% 7% 5% Pas du tout utile / Not at all useful 1% 1% 0% 6% 3% NSP / DK 16% 8% 7% 25% 24% Utile / Useful 80% 88% 93% 62% 68% Pas utile / Not useful 4% 3% 0% 13% 8%