Doc. 124.pdf

Document Sample
Doc. 124.pdf Powered By Docstoc
					Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 124 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/25/2012 Page 1 of 2



                              UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                              SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

                             CASE NO. 11-20120-CIV-SIMONTON


  TRAIAN BUJDUVEANU,

         Plaintiff,
  v.

  DISMAS CHARITIES, INC., ANA GISPERT,
  DEREK THOMAS, and LASHANDA ADAMS,

         Defendants.
                                                   /

        AMENDED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO EXTEND
                 TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COURT’S ORDER FOR
                   SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

         Presently pending before the Court is the Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Extend

  Time to Respond to the Court’s Order for Second Motion for Summary Judgment (DE #

  121). In that Motion, the pro se Plaintiff requests that he be given a brief extension of

  time until October 31, 2012 in which to file his Second Motion for Summary Judgment

  due to his absence from this country for medical treatment.1

         Based upon a thorough review of the record, and considering the Plaintiff’s pro

  se status, it is



         1
            Although the Plaintiff has styled the Motion as a request for extension of time to
  respond to the Court’s Order for Second Motion for Summary Judgment, the body of the
  Motion requests that the Plaintiff be granted additional time to respond to the
  Defendants’ Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment. However, the Plaintiff has
  already responded to the Defendants’ Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment (DE
  # 111) and also filed a Sur-Reply to that Motion (DE ## 114, 115). In addition, the October
  19, 2012 date referenced in the Plaintiff’s Motion was the deadline date for the Plaintiff to
  re-file his Motion for Summary Judgment (DE # 119 at 16). Therefore, the undersigned
  construes the instant Motion as one seeking additional time for the Plaintiff to re-file his
  Motion for Summary Judgment. The Plaintiff may not file an additional response or reply
  to the Defendants’ Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment, as the Plaintiff has
  already had the opportunity to fully respond to that Motion.
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 124 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/25/2012 Page 2 of 2



         ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Extend Time

  to Respond to the Court’s Order for Second Motion for Summary Judgment (DE # 121) is

  GRANTED. The Plaintiff shall file his renewed Motion for Summary Judgment if he

  elects to file such a Motion, on or before Wednesday, October 31, 2012. The Defendants

  shall have until November 16, 2012 in which to file a Response to the Plaintiff’s Second

  Motion for Summary Judgment, and the Plaintiff may file a Reply on or before November

  27, 2012.

         DONE AND ORDERED in chambers, in Miami, Florida, on October 25, 2012.




                                                  ___________________________________
                                                  ANDREA M. SIMONTON
                                                  U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

  Copies furnished via CM/ECF to
        Counsel of Record and

  Via U.S. Mail to pro se Plaintiff




                                              2

				
DOCUMENT INFO