EQUITABLE APE-MAN IS ENGINEERING
The completion of the human gene map today does not yield the result that humans are related to apes.
One need not be deceived by evolutionists' attempts to exploit this new scientific developments as they
have done with others.
As is known, the recent completion of the human gene map as part of the Human Genome Project is a
very important scientific developments. However, some of the results of this project diverted by some
evolutionist publications. Stated that the chimpanzee genes have a 98% similarity with human genes.
This is presented as evidence for the claim that apes are related to humans, and so on, as evidence for
the theory of evolution. In fact, this is evidence of "fake" that evolutionist who took advantage of the
lack of public knowledge about the subject.
Claim 98% similarity is
First, it should be emphasized that the concept of 98% similarity between human and chimpanzee DNA
is frequently advanced by evolutionists is deceptive.
In order to claim that the genetic humans and chimpanzees have 98% similarity, also have mapped the
genome of chimpanzees, like humans. Both must be compared, and the results to be obtained.
However, such results are not available, because so far, only the human gene has been mapped. No
such research has not been done on chimpanzees.
In fact, 98% similarity between human and chimpanzee, which occasionally enters the agenda, is a
propaganda slogan aimed deliberately created a few years ago. This similarity is an exaggerated
generalization is based on the extraordinary similarities in the amino acid sequence of about 30-40 basic
proteins in humans and chimpanzees. A sequence analysis was performed with a method named "DNA
hybridization" on the DNA sequences associated with these proteins and only a limited number of
proteins have been compared.
However, there are about a hundred thousand genes, and therefore one hundred thousand proteins
encoded by these genes in humans. Therefore, there is no scientific basis for the claim that all human
and ape genes are 98% similar 40 just because of the similarity of the 100,000 proteins.
On the other hand, DNA comparisons were performed on 40 proteins is also controversial. This
comparison was made in 1987 by two biologists named Sibley and Ahlquist, and published in a regular
issue of the Journal of Molecular Evolution named. 15 However, another scientist named Sarich who
examined the data obtained by the two scientists concluded that the reliability of the method they use
is controversial and that the data has been interpreted over-lebihan.16 Dr. Don Batten, another
biologist, also analyzed this issue in 1996 and concluded that the real similarity rate was 96.2%, not 98%
Human DNA is also similar to
The Worm, Mosquito and Chicken!
Furthermore, basic proteins mentioned above are vital molecules present in various other living
creatures. The structure of the protein of the same kind, not only in chimpanzees, but also in living a
completely different, very similar to that in humans.
For example, genetic analyzes published in New Scientist have revealed a 75% similarity between the
DNA of nematode worms and manusia.18 This definitely does not mean that there is only a 25%
difference between man and these worms! According to the genealogical chain made by evolutionists,
phylum Chordata, in which humans belong, and the phylum Nematoda have been different from each
other even since 530 years ago as well.
On the other hand, in another finding which also appeared in the local media, stated that the
comparisons made between fruit fly genes from Drosophila species and human genes yielded a
similarity of 60% .19
In other cases, the analyzes done on some proteins show man as closely linked to a number of very
different creatures. In a survey conducted by researchers from the University of Cambridge, some
proteins of land dwelling animals were compared. The amazing thing, in almost all samples, human and
chicken paired as the closest relatives. The next closest relative is buaya.20
Another example used by evolutionists on "the genetic similarity between humans and apes" is the
presence of 48 chromosomes in chimpanzees and gorillas versus 46 chromosomes in humans.
Evolutionists regard the closeness of the number of chromosomes as an indication of an evolutionary
relationship. However, if the logic used by evolutionists is valid, then the people will have a closer
relative than the chimpanzee, namely: "potato"! As the number of chromosomes in the same potato in
These examples confirm that the concept of genetic similarity does not constitute evidence for the
theory of evolution. This is because the genetic similarities are not in line with the scheme of
evolutionary inventions, and conversely, yield completely opposite.
Genetic Similarities Upset "Evolution Schematic"
a Try to Appointed
Not surprisingly, when the issue is evaluated as a whole, it appears that the subject of "biochemical
similarity" does not constitute evidence for evolution, but rather leaves the theory in a difficult
situation. Dr. Christian Schwabe, a biochemistry researcher from the Faculty of Health South Carolina
University, is an evolutionist scientist who has spent many years looking for evidence of evolution in the
molecular domain. In particular he carried out research on insulin and type proteins ralaxin and tried to
establish evolutionary relationships among living things. However, he admitted many times that he
could not find any evidence for evolution at any of the studies. In an article published in a scientific
journal, he said:
Molecular evolution is accepted as a method superior to paleontology for the discovery of evolutionary
relationships. As a molecular evolutionist I should be elated. Instead it seems disconcerting that many
exceptions exist to the orderly progression of species as determined by molecular homologies; so much
so in fact I think the exception, the quirks, may carry the message more penting.21
Based on the latest findings in the field of molecular biology, the renowned biochemist Prof.. Michael
Denton commented as follows:
Each class at a molecular level is unique, isolated and not connected by intermediates. Thus, molecules,
like fossils, have failed to provide the elusive intermediates so long sought by evolutionary biology .... At
the molecular level, no organism is "ancestral" or "primitive" or "advanced" compared with its relatives
.... There is little doubt that if this molecular evidence had been available a century ago .... The idea of
organic evolution might never be diterima.22
Similarities are not evidence for
Evolution but for Creation
It is surely natural for the human body to bear some molecular similarities to other living beings,
because they are all made of the same molecules, they all use the same water and atmosphere, and
they all consume food containing the same molecule. Certainly, their metabolisms and therefore genetic
appearance will resemble one another. This, however, is not evidence that they evolved from a common
"Material" is not the result of evolution but of "common design", that is, they are created with the same
This can be explained with an example: all of the construction in the world is done with similar materials
(brick, iron, cement, etc..). This, however, does not mean that these buildings "evolved" from each
other. They are constructed separately by using the same material. It is also common in living things.
Life did not originate as a result of various accidental coincidences as evolution claims, but as a result of
the creation by God, the Almighty, the owner of the knowledge and wisdom that is unlimited.