Docstoc

Exercises_ Drills_ and Scenarios

Document Sample
Exercises_ Drills_ and Scenarios Powered By Docstoc
					  9400 Area Planning Documentation
  This Appendix documents the analysis, risk assessment, and scenario development of the Area Planning
  Committee; the information in the Appendix defines the conditions this plan was designed to meet and
  serves as the foundation for the objectives, strategies, resources, training, and policy for response. This
  appendix is organized as follows:

  9400 AREA PLANNING DOCUMENTATION.......................................................................................... 1

  9410 Spill/Release History ............................................................................................................................. 1

  9420 Planning Factors and Assumptions...................................................................................................... 2
       9421 Oil Spill Planning Factor and Assumptions ................................................................................... 2
       9422 Hazardous Materials Planning Factors and Assumptions ............................................................... 3
       9422.1 Focus of Planning Activities ........................................................................................................ 4
       9422.2 Geography.................................................................................................................................... 4
       9422.3 Sensitive Environmental Areas .................................................................................................... 4
       9422.4 Land Use ...................................................................................................................................... 4
       9422.5 Water Supplies ............................................................................................................................. 4
       9422.6 Public Transportation................................................................................................................... 4
       9422.7 Population Density....................................................................................................................... 4
       9422.8 Particularly Sensitive Institutions ................................................................................................ 4
       9422.9 Climate / Weather ........................................................................................................................ 5

  9430 Area Risk Assessment……………………………………………………………………………….. . 5
       9431 Area Oil Pollution Risks ................................................................................................................. 5
       9432 Area Hazardous Materials Risk ……………………………………………………………………5
       9432.1 Offshore…………………………………………………………………………………………..5
       9432.2 Marine Fire Risks………………………………………………………………………………...5

  9440 Planning Scenarios……………………………………………………………………………………..6
       9441 Oil Spill Scenarios……………………………………………………………………………….. .6
       9441.1 Average Most Probable Discharge………………………………………………………………6
       9441.2 Maximum Most Probable Discharge…………………………………………………………….7
       9441.3 Worst Case Discharge…………………………………………………………………………..9
       9442 HAZMAT Release Scenario..…………………………………………………………………….15
       9442.1 Facility Scenario - Anhydrous Ammonia Release……………………………………………...15
       9442.2 Facility Scenario - Liquefied Petroleum Gas (Propane) Release……………………………….18
       9443 Marine Firefighting Scenarios………………………………………………………………….....19
       9444 Salvage Scenarios………………………………………………………………………………....20
       9445 Weapons of Mass Destruction Scenarios…………………………………………………………20



  9410 Spill / Release History
  Utilizing the spill information available through the Coast Guard's Marine Safety Information System
  (MSIS), all reported oil spills were analyzed to meet the requirements for this section. To remove reports
  that would tend to skew the analysis and make this database more manageable, all reports meeting the
  below criteria were deleted from the analysis:

        1.    All oil spill of less than 25 gallons. Because of the large number of recreational vessels within the


VERSION          1             CLASSIFICATION:            CONTROLLING           AREA PLANNING           ISSUING           SECTOR
 DATE         01MAR07          UNCLASSIFIED                AUTHORITY             COMMITTEE             AUTHORITY         COMMANDER           PAGE         9400-1
      Florida Keys, a significant percentage of the reported oil spills involved relatively small quantities of
      oil. These reports are spread throughout the zone. The quantities involved usually dissipate before any
      response action can begin.

      2. All MARPOL I reports. Coast Guard aircraft fly extensively over the Florida Straits and report all
      sheen sightings offshore as apparent MARPOL Annex I violations. These discharges usually occur
      well offshore, with no possibility of effective cleanup.

      3. All reports of floating and beached drums. Floating and beached drums are frequently reported
      but rarely result in actual pollution and then only in small quantities.

  The following is the list of noteworthy oil spill reports which occurred between July 1, 1988 and June 30,
  1993.


  CASE              DATE           PIN     LOCATION, MATERIAL, AMOUNT
  MP91006388        25 JUN 91              OFF MOLASSES REEF, JET FUEL, 1,344,000 GAL,
                                           POTENTIAL
  MP89009532        30 OCT 89              DRY TORTUGAS, #6 OIL/DIESEL, 120,000/23000 GAL,
                                           POTENTIAL
  MP91003087        28 MAR 91              OFF KEY LARGO, #6 OIL, 7000 GAL
  MC93010757        18 JUN 93      271     SOUTH OF KEY WEST, DIESEL/LUBE OIL, 6000/150 GAL
  MP88008461        19 DEC 88              DRY TORTUGAS, DIESEL, 6000 GAL, POTENTIAL
  MC92005979        23 APR 92      185     MOLASSES REEF, DIESEL, 3000 GAL, POTENTIAL
  MC93004349        13 MAR 93      122     SE OF KEY WEST, DIESEL, 3000 GAL,POTENTIAL
  MC93014899        19 AUG 93      404     BOCA CHICA, JP-5, 999 GAL, POTENTIA L
  MC93010336        12 JUN 93      254     ISLAMORADA, DIESEL, 500 GAL
  MC93006935        22 APR 93      187     SOUTHWEST OF KEY WEST, DIESEL, 300 GAL
  MP91000130        02 JAN 90              KEY LARGO, DIESEL, 200 GAL
  MP89000061        29 DEC 88              BOCA CHICA, WASTE OIL, 200 GAL
  MP91000372        04 JAN 91              KEY WEST, BILGE OIL, 75 GAL
  MP91011375        26 JUL 91              KEY LARGO, #6 OIL, 65 GAL
  MP88006938        15 0CT 88              MARATHON, DIESEL, 50 GAL
  MC92021818        23 DEC 92      606     BOCA CHICA, DIESEL, 40 GAL
  MC92019388        03 NOV 92      537     KEY WEST, DIESEL, 30 GAL
  MP89008180        24 SEP 89              MARATHON, DIESEL, 30 GAL
  MC92010800        05 JUL 92      364     KEY WEST, UNKNOWN OIL, 26 GAL
  MP90000021        28 DEC 89              KEY WEST, BILGE OIL, 25 GAL



  9420 Planning Factors and Assumptions

  9421 Oil Spill Planning Factors and Assumptions
  The following planning factors and assumptions are made concerning the resources needed to respond to a
  worst case discharge of oil in the Sector Key West AOR.
      1. Equipment: Not enough boom has been identified to adequately protect the entire length of the
      Keys; 386,000' required, 165,000 readily available. The Logistics Division of the Incident Command
      System will be directed to begin immediate research into obtaining more from locations in other parts


VERSION      1        CLASSIFICATION:    CONTROLLING    AREA PLANNING    ISSUING      SECTOR
 DATE     01MAR07     UNCLASSIFIED        AUTHORITY      COMMITTEE      AUTHORITY    COMMANDER     PAGE        9400-2
      of the U. S. The only fire boom is located in Alaska and Texas or Florida. Until the government
      pre-approves more locations where in situ burning is allowed, contractors will not stockpile it.
      Obtaining enough boats to deploy and maintain the boom and to provide logistics support will require
      the contracting of most of the local small passenger and commercial fishing boats located throughout
      the area. This will also increase the amount of safety training needed to comply with the law.

      2. Personnel: There will not be enough personnel to deploy boom as soon as it arrives. There will also
      be a shortfall in the number of personnel available to monitor the scattered cleanup sites. The Coast
      Guard will utilize personnel from outside the State of Florida. It is anticipated that many contractors
      will have to subcontract outside labor. The spill impact area has inadequate food and lodging facilities.
      Berthing and feeding provisions will have to be supplied by DOD assets through the RRT.

      3. Funds: No funding shortfalls are expected.

      4. Minimum response times:
          A. Land response times will be long due to only one congested highway to the Keys. The State
          Agency Coordinator will be immediately requested to have the Governor of Florida declare a State
          of Emergency within the Florida Keys. The Florida Highway Patrol and local police departments
          will be used to convoy equipment deliveries and control civilian access to the Keys. Aircraft will
          be used to the greatest extent possible.

          B. The Monroe County hurricane evacuation procedures will be employed. These limit Keys
          access only to local residents possessing ID cards or other proof of residence in the impacted
          areas.

          C. No significant delays are anticipated for aircraft responses.

          D. Procurement of fire boom will require coordination of a Contractor, a Coast Guard C-130
          aircraft, and land based trucking companies. No local or regional spill contractors have expressed
          interest in purchasing or maintaining this type of boom until more areas have pre-approval for the
          use of in-situ burning.

          E. Obtaining the total number of feet of standard boom required will occur over several days. As
          more companies stockpile boom, this response time should decrease.

          F. There may be significant delays in contracting for vessels required to support the response.

          G. Location and identification of additional resources: The Sector does not have sufficient
          personnel to assign to the tasks of locating additional equipment during an incident. The National
          Strike Force Coordination Center (NSFCC) or District Response Advisory Teams (DRAT) should
          be tasked to provide this assistance to FOSCs.

  9422 Hazardous Materials Planning Factors and
  Assumptions
  This section outlines the planning factors and assumptions relied upon in developing the Hazardous
  Materials Annex, Annex 7000 to this plan. There is not a significant quantity of hazardous materials stored
  within the Florida Keys (see Section 9432 for locations of Hazmat stored). It is assumed that response
  actions to Hazmat incidents within the Florida Keys will be responded to by one of the flowing agencies
  depending on location of the incident.

      •   City of Key West


VERSION      1        CLASSIFICATION:    CONTROLLING     AREA PLANNING    ISSUING     SECTOR
 DATE     01MAR07     UNCLASSIFIED        AUTHORITY       COMMITTEE      AUTHORITY   COMMANDER     PAGE      9400-3
      •   Naval Air Station Boca Chica Fire Department or
      •   Miami –Dade Fire Rescue.

  9422.1 Focus of Planning Activities
  In scenario based planning, your initial development of a response plan would be centered upon addressing
  the progression of response issues and identifying the capabilities and abilities of government or private
  sector response entities that can address and remedy those issues.

  9422.2 Geography
  •   Sensitive environmental areas
  •   Land use
  •   Water supplies
  •   Public transportation
  •   Population density
  •   Particularly sensitive institutions (e.g., schools, hospitals, homes for the aged, etc.

  9422.3 Sensitive Environmental Areas
  Refer to Section 4620 of this Plan and Volume II of the Area Contingency Plan for sensitivity maps.

  9422.4 Land Use
  The Florida Keys is primarily a tourist destination with numerous hotels, motels, R/V parks, and marinas.
  Small commercial operations also exist in the Keys along with small shopping areas. Housing consists of
  single-family and multi-family zoning including numerous mobile home parks scattered throughout the
  Keys.

  9422.5 Water Supplies
  Refer to Section 4610.

  9422.6 Public Transportation
  Air, land, and sea-borne transportation is available throughout the COTP Key West AOR. The AOR has
  two commercial airports (Key West & Marathon), one Naval Air Station (Boca Chica) and a small private
  airport at Ocean Reef in Key Largo. There is one shuttle service connecting the Keys with the Miami/Ft
  Lauderdale areas and one bus line (Greyhound) servicing the area. Additionally, the Key West Transits
  Authority provides bus services up to Marathon.

  9422.7 Population Density
  The City of Key West has the highest population in the COTP Key West AOR with an estimated 25,478
  citizens. The estimated total population within the AOR is 74,737.




VERSION      1         CLASSIFICATION:     CONTROLLING     AREA PLANNING     ISSUING      SECTOR
 DATE     01MAR07      UNCLASSIFIED         AUTHORITY       COMMITTEE       AUTHORITY    COMMANDER   PAGE     9400-4
  9422.8 Particularly Sensitive Institutions
  • For a list of schools & nursing homes, Contact Monroe County Emergency Management: Contact
  information is provided in Section 9231.
  • For a list of hospitals, refer to Section 9275.1

  9422.9 Climate/Weather
  COTP Key West’s AOR is subject to severe weather events which could directly or indirectly lead to
  hazardous chemical incidents including storm surge, flooding, hurricanes, lightning and tornadoes.

  9430 Area Risk Assessment
  9431 Area Oil Pollution Risks
  Threats – facilities/installations: Three facilities in the Key AOR are required to have Facility Response
  Plans (FRP) due to the quantity of oil transferred and/or stored onsite. A copy of the Facility Response
  Plans for each facility is maintained by Sector Key West. A potential exists for a spill to occur during
  offloading, storage, and transfer of product at each of these facilities. Potential spills are described in each
  facility FRP in terms of the average most probable, maximum most probable and worst case discharges.
  The primary petroleum products being transferred/stored at these facilities include: JP-5, No 2 fuel oil,
  diesel fuel, gasoline, lube oil and mineral oil.

  Threats – road/ship transport: The largest concern from a release occurring on the highway system is from
  an accident involving a tanker carrying gasoline and/or diesel fuel. Numerous tankers carrying these
  products transit the Keys on a daily basis as there are no terminal facilities for the storage of vehicular fuels
  located in the Keys. An accident on US 1 on one of the numerous bridges running from Key Largo to Key
  West could result in a significant discharge of petroleum products into the very sensitive marine ecosystem.
  Two facilities in the Key West AOR receive fuel by vessel. Both facilities conduct transfer operations
  within either a slip or a confined area. Additionally the vessels are boomed-off and are under continuous
  surveillance during unloading operations. These actions limit the potential risk of a spill escaping the
  containment areas.

  9432 Area Hazardous Materials Risk
  Threats - facilities/installations: In this region, there are a few facilities which store hazardous materials.
  These include several propane storage facilities, one facility which stores small quantities of anhydrous
  ammonia and a few facilities that store small quantities of chlorine gas for disinfection of water.

  Threats - road/ship transport: Tank trucks carry and deliver propane to several propane storage facilities
  located throughout the Keys. There is no hazmat brought into the Keys by ship and only small (consumer-
  sized) quantities of Hazmat are delivered by truck. A list of facilities storing Hazmat’s is maintained by the
  Sector Key West Planning Department.

  9432.1 Offshore
  Threats - ship transport: There is very limited knowledge regarding types and quantities of HAZMAT that
  may be transported offshore of the Florida Key. However, it is likely that significant quantities of Hazmat
  are routinely moved through Sector Key West's AOR while en-route to other ports.




VERSION       1         CLASSIFICATION:     CONTROLLING     AREA PLANNING     ISSUING      SECTOR
 DATE      01MAR07      UNCLASSIFIED         AUTHORITY       COMMITTEE       AUTHORITY    COMMANDER     PAGE         9400-5
  9432.2 Marine Fire Risks
  A risk of a marine fire exists at every marina and fuel storage facility within the Keys. Additionally, large
  and small vessels docked or transiting the Florida Keys are also at risk of experiencing an onboard fire. To
  identify the facilities at risk, a list of Marinas that provide fueling services is located in Section 9253. Also,
  the following facilities within the Key West area have some risk of experiencing a marine related incident
  involving a fire.

          •   Ralph Garcia Generating Plant - Stock Island
              Risk: Unloading and storage of No. 2 fuel oil & storage of other petroleum products
          •   Naval Air Station Key West – Boca Chica
              Risk: Receipt and storage of JP-5 & storage of other petroleum products
          •   Key West Pipeline Company – Trumbo Point
              Risk: Receipt, storage, and transfer of JP-5
          •   Key West Cruise Ship & Ferry Docks
          •   Navy Mole Pier


  9440 Planning Scenarios
  9441 Oil Spill Scenarios
  This section outlines a response to 3 oil spill scenarios: an average most probable discharge, a maximum
  most probable discharge, and a worst case discharge. An essential part of contingency planning is
  anticipating the effects of a spill and preparing in advance the response actions to spills that are likely to
  occur in the area. These assessments are most accurately achieved by conducting table-top drills and
  exercises.

  The environmental sensitivity of natural resources within the Sector Key West AOR makes rapid and
  effective spill response essential. In developing the Worst Case Discharge Scenario, it became clear that
  where it is practical, the Coast Guard response options should include in-situ burning and use of
  dispersants. In addition, it may be necessary for the OSC to direct destruction of the vessel and cargo under
  the Intervention on the High Seas Act, as amended (33 USC 1471-1487).

  Each of these three response options involves RRT concurrence and in the case of intervention, further
  review by Commandant. Any delay in approval will adversely impact the response action. To minimize
  potential delays, the OSC shall retain the option of ordering the staging of fire boom, dispersants,
  dispersant application equipment and any other assets deemed necessary while awaiting RRT and
  Commandant authorization for use.

  The discharge scenarios described in this section include the following quantities of oil:

      •       AVERAGE PROBABLE DISCHARGE: estimated to be 60 GAL of diesel

      •       MAXIMUM MOST PROBABLE DISCHARGE: estimated to be 10,000 GAL of No 6 fuel oil

      •       WORST CASE DISCHARGE: projected to be 12,000,000 GAL of crude or refined oil

  9441.1 Average Most Probable Discharge
  The average most probable discharge of oil in the Sector Key West area of responsibility is a mystery sheen


VERSION          1       CLASSIFICATION:    CONTROLLING     AREA PLANNING    ISSUING       SECTOR
 DATE         01MAR07    UNCLASSIFIED        AUTHORITY       COMMITTEE      AUTHORITY     COMMANDER     PAGE       9400-6
  resulting from a diesel fuel spill of 10-20 gallons. These spills probably originate from fishing vessels
  based on their location. They may be fuel directly entering the water or fuel entering the bilges and then
  being pumped overboard. By the time these spills are reported, the sheen is generally too thin to be
  sampled. Clean up of these spills is almost never possible.

  The average most probable discharge of oil in the Sector Key West area of responsibility for which a
  cleanup occurs is a diesel fuel spill of 60-100 gallons in the Key West Bight. Due to the immediate
  availability of some response equipment most of the spill is contained. When this size spill occurs from a
  commercial or recreational vessel the response often requires the Sector to initiate cleanup.

  Average Most Probable Discharge Scenario: At 0800 a 50 feet yacht overfills it fuel tank discharging
  diesel fuel into the water in the Key West Harbor. At 0845 a report is received of approximately 60 gallons
  of diesel fuel oil trapped around the yacht and the dock; some of which is contained using port authority
  boom. Upon notification, the Sector Response Officer sends out the duty pollution investigators. The local
  DEP representative and FWCC are notified of the incident. Pollution investigators determine that the
  responsibility party has hired a response contractor in Big Pine Key.

  The cleanup contractor's crew arrives at 10:30 AM with additional boom and sorbent materials. 50 feet of
  containment boom is deployed to contain the remaining oil slick and sorbent pads are used to absorb the
  contained oil. The pads are collected into plastic trash bags and double bagged for disposal when they
  become oil soaked. All oiled boats, docks, and equipment is thoroughly decontaminated using pressure
  washers. By 1600, pollution investigators determine that the area has been sufficiently clean-up and
  response efforts are terminated.


  9441.2 Maximum Most Probable Discharge
  Maximum Most Probable Discharge Scenario: At 0500 on a Sunday morning the M/V Portsmith Trader,
  an 800-foot cargo vessel carrying 1.2 million gallons of fuel runs aground in the Florida Keys National
  Marine Sanctuary on Elbow Reef off Key Largo. The vessel is aground on top of the City of Washington, a
  historic resource listed on the Florida Keys Shipwreck trail. As the vessel grounds, extensive damage
  occurs to the coral reef system and historical artifacts on the reef. Additionally, one of the vessel’s fuel
  tanks is damaged releasing 10,000 of No. 6 fuel oil. The vessel Master contacts Coast Guard Sector Key
  West immediately after the grounding.

  The Sector Key West Response duty officer is notified of the event at 0515. The initial information passed
  by the Master is that the cargo ship has grounded on Elbow Reef and that oil is in the water. The duty
  officer notifies the Commanding Officer and Executive Officer, recalls the duty section, and instructs the
  OPCEN to immediately call in all available Sector personnel, notify District 7 Command Center and Sector
  Miami for assistance and inform NOAA National Marine Sanctuary, FWCC, DEP, State Warning Point
  and Monroe County (Emergency Management, Police, Fire Rescue) of the incident.

  It will take Station Islamorada about one hour to get a small boat on scene to evaluate the situation. The
  Sector duty officer should consider the following initial actions:

          1. Request that Station Islamorada dispatch a small boat to provide timely evaluation of the situation.

          2. Inform the Seventh Coast Guard District MEP duty officer and operations center of the casualty.
             Secure a Federal Project Number from the duty MEP officer. Request an over-flight be arranged
             via the Seventh Coast Guard District Command Center. Request a Coast Guard cutter to serve as
             On-Scene Commander.

          3. Determine if the ship is contracting for response services. If not then contact a BOA oil spill


VERSION       1         CLASSIFICATION:    CONTROLLING    AREA PLANNING     ISSUING     SECTOR
 DATE      01MAR07      UNCLASSIFIED        AUTHORITY      COMMITTEE       AUTHORITY   COMMANDER     PAGE      9400-7
            contractor and   alert them of the need for response.

          4. Contact ships agent.

  The initial report received at 0615 from the Station Islamorada small boat, is that the vessel is hard aground
  and that a large quantity of oil is in the water and appears to be moving toward shore. Reports to Sector
  Key West from the vessel state that a damage survey is being conducted by the crew but is not complete.
  Two tugs are on the way from Port Everglades to assist the vessel.

  The following decisions will have to be made at this time:

          1. Can the leak be stopped by pumping oil from the damaged tank into other onboard tanks?

          2. Bring NOAA personnel into Unified Command. Sanctuary personnel will be integral partners in
             the response efforts to assess damages and approve the salvage plan and vessel removal operations
             to prevent further damage to the reef system and historical artifacts.

          3. Obtaining an oil spill trajectory from NOAA to determine when and where the spill is expected to
             hit the shoreline. Also, where to deploy the initial containment booms to reduce the spreading of
             the oil and protect sensitive shorelines in the path of the oil.

          4. Where to set up the command post for the response. Ensure State and vessel representative are
             notified of the location.

          5. How many additional oil spill cleanup contractors will be needed to handle the clean-up? Will
             additional resources be necessary, Strike Team, cleanup monitors, boat crews, etc.?

  An Incident Command Post is established at the Monroe County Emergency Operations Center by 1000.
  The Command Post is fully staffed by 1230. Using a trajectory model, NOAA estimates that the oil will
  begin coming onshore around 1700 today in the Garden Grove area which is located area approximately 5
  miles north of the John Pennekamp State Park.

  The ship reports that the two assist tugs and the MSRC’s Florida Responder are expected to be on-scene by
  1800 today and their primary OSRO, MSRC will be on-scene by 1300. The ship also reports that one fuel
  tank has been holed and there are no further damages found to the vessel, its cargo or its fuel tanks.

  RESPONSE STRATEGY AND EQUIPMENT: The initial response strategy is to secure the damaged
  tank from continuing to discharge. Boom-off the vessel, conduct over-flights to map the location of the
  spill and obtain a spill trajectory model to determine when and where the oil will impact shorelines.
  Request the services of the Gulf Strike Team and establish a marine safety zone around the vessel.
  Determine the sensitivity of the shorelines and develop a protection/recovery strategy using the
  sensitivity/protection maps in the Area Contingency Plan. Move protection/recovery resources into the area
  as quickly as possible and deploy resources ahead of the slick. Conduct a detailed damage assessment of
  the vessel and determine if additional products may be at risk of being released. Also work with NOAA to
  conduct underwater surveys to initially assess damages to the coral reef system and determine best egress
  route to remove vessel. Develop vessel salvage plan working with NOAA, Salvage Master, and NAVY
  SUPLSALV. Plan should include taking appropriated actions to secure/liter products as necessary to safely
  remove the vessel to limit further damages to natural and historical resources.

  The estimated amount of equipment necessary to contain the spill and to collect the oil is as follows:

          1. Containment Boom (18") to deflect oil away from sensitive shorelines and containment boom to
             hold oil from escaping Garden Cove area = 20,000 feet of containment & deflection boom.


VERSION       1         CLASSIFICATION:   CONTROLLING     AREA PLANNING    ISSUING     SECTOR
 DATE      01MAR07      UNCLASSIFIED       AUTHORITY       COMMITTEE      AUTHORITY   COMMANDER     PAGE      9400-8
          2. Boom (36") to boom off vessel = 4,000 feet.
          3. Vacuum trucks and near-shore skimmers to collect approximately 8,000 gallons of oil trapped in
            the Garden Cove Marina = 3 Vacuum Trucks and 3 skimmers.
          4. Frac. Tanks to store/transport the recovered product = 2.
          5. Coast Guard small boats to enforce Marine Safety Zone = 2.
          6. Coast Guard 110 Cutter to serve as On-Scene Commander = 1.
          7. MSRC Florida Responder = to collect approximately 2,000 gallon of offshore oil.

  PERSONNEL: Coast Guard Personnel needed to conduct this exercise over a ten day period would
  include at a minimum:

          1.    12 = Pollution investigators/cleanup monitors
          2.    10 = OSC representative qualified personnel
          3.    02 = Casualty Investigators
          3.    03 = Coxswains
          4.    03 = Qualified small boat crew
          5.    05 = Personnel to man Field Command Post
          6.    12 = Personnel to man Incident Command Post
          7.    06 = Support Personnel
          8.    15 = 110 Foot Cutter On-scene Commander
                68 = Total personnel needed

  RESPONSE: Primary response to the event would be by all personnel at Sector Key West and boat crews
  from Station’s Key West, Marathon and Islamorada. This would be enough personnel to provide three
  boat crews, three land based pollution investigation/monitoring teams, two casualty investigators and
  personnel to man the Field and Incident Command Posts. Additional personnel qualified to conduct
  pollution investigations and monitor cleanup operations would have to be obtained through the Seventh
  Coast Guard District DRAT. Over-flight support would be provided by Coast Guard Air Station Miami.
  Requests should be made through the Seventh Coast Guard District Command Center.

  Response time for Sector Key West personnel to be on-scene shore-side may take as long as 2.5 to 3 hours
  during an early morning event. Support personnel from the Gulf Strike Team historically take 2-3 hours to
  arrive without equipment once notified. Local Reservists would likely be available to respond but funding
  to bring them on active duty may not be quickly resolved. TAD personnel from other Seventh Coast Guard
  District units could be available within 24 hours. Contractor furnished equipment located in the Keys could
  take up to 4 hours to arrive at Pennekamp Park. Additional resources outside the Keys would take a
  minimum of six to eight hours to arrive after they were called.

  Cleanup: The equipment listed is the minimum necessary to conduct an initial cleanup of product working
  24 hours a day for 7 days. Some of the product will have been lost due to evaporation (very little) and
  some dispersed into the water column which will be unrecoverable. The oil that enters the exposed
  marshes and mangroves presents the biggest problem for cleanup. Whether the mangroves or marshes
  should be entered to conduct cleaning operations or if/when to employ water washing or whether to just
  boom the area with sorbent boom and let the tidal action wash some of the free floating oil out of the area.
  The FOSC decision will be based on recommendations made by the shoreline cleanup and assessment team
  along with input from DEP and NOAA scientists. This part of the cleanup could take several months to
  complete. The FOSC will be guided by the SSC in making his decision on when final cleanup is considered
  to have been completed.


  9441.3 Worst Case Discharge


VERSION           1       CLASSIFICATION:   CONTROLLING   AREA PLANNING    ISSUING     SECTOR
 DATE          01MAR07    UNCLASSIFIED       AUTHORITY     COMMITTEE      AUTHORITY   COMMANDER    PAGE     9400-9
  Worst Case Discharge Scenario: The worst case discharge scenario is a collision involving a fully loaded
  Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC) and a container vessel, 15 miles south of Big Pine Key in the Florida
  Straits, in adverse weather conditions. The container ship struck the VLCC amidships at a 70 degree angle
  from the bow. The container ship's bow is heavily damaged but it is still seaworthy and under its own
  power. The VLCC has cargo tanks 4P and 5P ruptured with the adjacent longitudinal and transverse
  bulkheads fractured. The vessel is dead in the water, operating on emergency power only. The crew is
  abandoning ship. The leaking crude oil is burning. The fire is limited to the oil in the leaking tanks and to
  the immediate vicinity of the vessel. The Master is able to contact Coast Guard Sector Key West prior to
  the ships crew abandoning the vessel via the starboard lifeboat.

  The Sector Response duty officer is notified at 0215 September 30, 2006 that a VLCC transporting crude
  oil from Mexico to Philadelphia has collided with a container ship 15 miles south of Big Pine Key. The
  container ship strikes the VLCC amidships and is heavily damaged in the bow but still seaworthy and under
  power. The VLCC has suffered heavy damage. Initially, #4P and #5P wing cargo tanks have been
  penetrated with the adjacent longitudinal and transverse bulkheads fractured. The vessel is dead in the
  water with the crew abandoning ship. The oil from the damaged tanks is in the water and on fire
  immediately surrounding the vessel. The position of the vessel is approximately 15 NM south of Big Pine
  Key at latitude N24-25, longitude W081-22.

  By 0225, the duty officer notifies the Commanding Officer and Executive Officer, recalls the duty section,
  and instructs the OPCEN to immediately call in all available Sector personnel, notify District 7 Command
  Center and Sector Miami for assistance and inform NOAA National Marine Sanctuary, FWCC, DEP, State
  Warning Point, City of Key West fire/police departments and Monroe County (Emergency Management,
  Police, Fire Rescue) of the incident. The FOSC also, requests immediate assistance from the Gulf Strike
  Team.

  It will take the Sector personnel about two hours to get the Station Key West 47 on-scene to evaluate the
  situation due to rough weather. The duty officer should consider the following initial actions.

          1. Immediately dispatch CG and Navy Helos from Naval Air Station Boca Chica for SAR and to
          conduct initial assessment.

          2. Request Station Key West dispatch the 47 to provide timely evaluation of the situation.

          3. Inform the Seventh Coast Guard District Command Center and Response duty officer of the
          marine casualty. Secure a Federal Project Number from the MEP duty officer. Request additional
          helos from Air Station Miami and response personnel from Sector Miami to assist with the response.
          Divert two underway 110 foot cutters for SAR and one 270 foot cutter to serve as On-scene
          Commander.

          4. Contact BOA oil spill contractors and NRC & MSRC and alert them of the possible need for
          response.

          5. Contact ships agent.

          6. Alert local hospitals about potential casualties.

  The initial report received at 0300 from the CG Helo On-scene, is that the port side of the tankship is
  completely engulfed in flame and the oil on the water is burning. The tanker crew has abandoned ship are
  in life boats. No severe injuries have been reported so far. The container ship has bow damage but appears
  to be stable.




VERSION        1        CLASSIFICATION:     CONTROLLING     AREA PLANNING    ISSUING     SECTOR
 DATE       01MAR07     UNCLASSIFIED         AUTHORITY       COMMITTEE      AUTHORITY   COMMANDER   PAGE      9400-10
  The collision has resulted in the sudden release of 50,000 barrels or 2,100,000 gallons of South American
  crude destined for U. S. Refineries. Release would be instantaneous, occurring within one hour of the
  collision.
  The total potential discharge is 300,000 barrels or 12,600,000 gallons. The wind is from the south at
  approximately 25 MPH with visibility reduced during squalls to less than 1/2 mile. Seas are five (5) feet
  outside the reef, two (2) feet inside. Air and water temperatures are 75 and 80 degrees F, respectively.

          1. Historical spill considerations: From July 1, 1988 through June 30, 1993 there were three
          reported potential spills involving multi-million gallon cargoes within the Sector Key zone. No
          medium or major spills have occurred in the Keys areas in recent history although this is an area of
          frequent groundings. The frequency of groundings combined with the nearshore shipping lanes of
          tank vessels make this scenario a real possibility.

          2. Hazard assessment: MSDS information for crude oil will be used. During the initial days of the
          incident when the oil is burning, the hazards are greatly increased due to the inherent risks of
          working around burning oil and the possibility of respiratory problems developing. Air monitoring
          on site and at various locations downwind must be conducted. This information should be used to
          assist in the development of the site safety plan.

          3. Vulnerability analysis: The Florida Keys is the most environmentally sensitive area of south
          Florida. This area hosts numerous important resources such as living coral reefs, mangroves, turtle
          and crocodile nesting areas, and many bird nesting areas.

          4. Risk assessment: Oil discharged south of the reef line, which extends from Key West to Key
          Largo, would be pushed north towards the islands by wind action and eastward by the offshore
          parallel currents. Oil impacting the shoreline is inevitable.

          5. Seasonal considerations: This scenario can occur during all times of the year. The most severe
          weather threat is experienced from June through November, the traditional hurricane season, but on
          average, the winds and seas are strongest during the late fall and winter months of October through
          March. Sea turtles nest from March through October with the greatest risk from May through
          September.

  The following decisions will have to be made at this time:
      1. Should the FOSC consider the use of dispersants and in-situ burning?

      2. Can fire boom and/or dispersant equipment be obtained and deployed prior to the oil getting too
      close to shore?

      3. Can the oil be separated from the vessel to prevent further burning and damage to the vessel?

      4. Does the on scene weather conditions permit burning, i.e. winds less that 20 MPH, waves 4 feet or
      less? Due to the varying current directions, the requested trajectory may prove to be unreliable and
      should be supplemented with on scene observations by the Investigative Team.

      5. What additional resources are needed (MSRC, NRC, Gulf Strike Team etc.) and how many oil spill
      cleanup contractors will be needed to handle the cleanup?

      6. Where to stage response equipment.

      7. Where to set up the Incident Command Post for the response. Ensure State and vessel
      representatives are notified of the location.



VERSION       1         CLASSIFICATION:    CONTROLLING    AREA PLANNING    ISSUING     SECTOR
 DATE      01MAR07      UNCLASSIFIED        AUTHORITY      COMMITTEE      AUTHORITY   COMMANDER     PAGE      9400-11
      8. Can the fire & discharge source be secured? Due to the extent of the damage, the resultant fire, and
      the crew abandoning ship, securing of the source would not be possible. No attempt would be made to
      deploy the pollution containment equipment required on board the vessel.

      9. What sensitive areas are at risk? The greatest risk is the potential for damage to the coral reefs,
      seagrass ecosystems, mangroves and coastal vegetation found in the area. Of secondary importance is
      the loss of public use (and subsequent revenue) of the numerous beaches and parks located in the Keys.
      The sensitive areas are mapped out in detail in the Environmental Sensitivity maps contained in
      Volume II of the Plan.

  The FOSC decides to initially establish the Incident Command Post at Sector Key West due to the need to
  have communications with Coast Guard cutters and aircraft. However, due to the size of the incident, the
  FOSC may consider moving the Incident Command Post to Hawks Cay Motel/Marina in Duck Key as the
  response organization expands to address the size of the incident. Hawk’s Cay has adequate berthing, food
  and conference facilities and the Monroe County Emergency Operations Center in Marathon is too small to
  sustain this level of incident.

  The Response & Prevention Sections report to the Sector and begin activating Contractors, updating all
  involved agencies and requesting the NOAA SSC to obtain a trajectory of the spill. Sector Search and
  Rescue Units are activated at Station’s Key West and Marathon and underway cutters are diverted in
  response to the need for possible medivacs and person-in-water searches. The vessels should be on scene
  within 2 hours. They would also be asked to obtain a sample of several gallons of the oil and arrange for
  delivery to the Sector. Vessels are instructed to conduct fire-fighting operations if feasible.

          1. Initial on-scene investigation, evaluation and recommendations: The Investigation Team would
          attempt to determine the amount and direction of oil discharged, assess the general condition of the
          two vessels and report back to the FOSC. They should make recommendations as to the immediate
          disposition of the container ship and to the feasibility of towing and/or anchoring the VLCC. The
          container ship would be requested to provide SAR assistance as able and to provide local weather
          conditions and updates.

          2. Response Strategy and Equipment: The initial response strategy is to conduct search and rescue
          operations, evaluate the stability of both vessels, extinguish the fire if safe to do so and limit the
          spread of oil and determine the best methods to prevent the oil from reaching the shoreline. The
          initial actions would be to deploy equipment to designated staging areas in an effort to prevent oil
          from spreading north of U. S. 1 and into the more environmentally sensitive areas. This would be
          accomplished using boom and skimmers designed for shallow water operations. Simultaneously,
          procurement of fire boom would be initiated. Once on scene, it would be deployed in an effort to
          burn as much of the spilled oil as possible. Burning would not be conducted within 6 miles of the
          islands. An Incident Command Post would be set up at Sector Key West and possibly moved to
          Hawk’s Cay Marina (Duck Key) north of Marathon as the response escalates in size and scope. The
          estimated amount of equipment necessary to contain the spill and to collect the oil is as follows:

            a. Boom: Approximately 386,000' of boom is required to prevent oil from entering north of the
            islands.

            b. Skimmers: 46 skimmers are required at a minimum. 75 percent of these must be capable of
            operating in water depths of less than 6 feet.

            c. Oil Spill Removal Vessels (OSRV’s): 3 Vessels needed at a minimum: MSRC’s Florida
            Responder (Miami), NRC’s Sentential (Miami), and the Coast Guard’s VOSS System (Port
            Everglades).



VERSION       1         CLASSIFICATION:    CONTROLLING    AREA PLANNING     ISSUING     SECTOR
 DATE      01MAR07      UNCLASSIFIED        AUTHORITY      COMMITTEE       AUTHORITY   COMMANDER     PAGE      9400-12
            d.. Aircraft: minimum of 3 helicopters (one for pollution mapping over-flights, two for SAR)
            periodic use of fixed wing for video mapping. FAA assistance will be required to establish flight
            restrictions for the airspace surrounding the tankship.

            e. Oil storage vessels/tanks: 18 large tank barges will be required to support the deep water
            skimming operations and transport the recovered oil/water mixture to shore for disposal. Another
            30 small tank barges will be required to support the shallow water skimming operations.

            f. Support vessels: 15 large tugs capable of towing the deep water skimming systems and
            shuttling barges to shore. Another 20 smaller tugs to support the shallow water skimming
            operations. About 200 small utility boats for tending skimmers, tending boom and other logistical
            support.

          3. Who will provide primary response resources: In the initial response, the majority of the
          resources will be provided by private contractors hired by the FOSC. After contact is established
          with the VLCC's operators, they may assume all, part or none of the clean up responsibility. Locally
          available equipment stockpiled by the various marinas and parks may also be used. The Vessel of
          Opportunity Skimming System (VOSS) and other larger skimmers will be provided by the Coast
          Guard and Navy Supervisor of Salvage (SUPSALV). The largest stock of fire boom is in Alaska
          (there is 1500 feet in Houston, TX; 750 feet being sent to the United Kingdom, 750 feet at the Clean
          Caribbean Cooperative in Fort Lauderdale). It is unknown what resources the responsible party will
          provide.

          4. Procedures for acquiring additional resource assistance: The Logistics Section is tasked with
          locating and obtaining equipment as the needs are identified. Locating sources include using the
          corporate knowledge of the Coast Guard National Strike Force and the Contractors involved.
          Additional sources of equipment are identified in Section 9200 of the Plan.

          5. Response time for all resources: The containment boom is scheduled to begin arriving in the
          Marathon area within 3 hours, initially from the local Coast Guard, State and contractor stockpiles.
          The rest of the identified 165,000' of boom and trained personnel and equipment needed to deploy
          the boom will arrive over the next 24 hours. Fire boom arrival is estimated within 24 hours. Small
          portable skimmers and the large skimmers in MSRC's and NRC’s Miami inventory will arrive on
          scene within 6 hours. The three OSRV’s will begin arriving within 12 hours. The majority of the
          larger skimmers are located in Jacksonville and will begin arriving in the Keys in approximately 10
          hours. National Strike Force and Navy SUPSALV assets will take up to 48 hours to reach the Keys.
          Contractor furnished equipment could take up to two hours to stage at Marathon and Big Pine Key
          areas. Additional resources outside the Keys would take a minimum of eight hours to arrive after
          they were called. Personnel from other Strike Teams would probably be available within 12 hours.

  Personnel: needed to conduct this exercise over a 3-6 month period would include at a minimum:

          1. Incident Command System: At full development will require about 55 Coast Guard officers and
          senior enlisted personnel in supervisory positions as well as 14 State agency representatives, 7
          NOAA representatives, 2 Fish & Wildlife representatives, 5 local agency representatives and 4
          responsible party representatives. An estimated 36 junior Coast Guard personnel would fill
          miscellaneous command support functions and 24 Coast Guard personnel to man boat crews.

          2. Field Operations: Requires a minimum of 55 Coast Guard enlisted personnel for field teams.
          The field personnel required from other agencies is expected to be about 75 total.

          3. Contractor personnel: Difficult to estimate because of the variability of manpower requirements
          for different response strategies. Including boom deployment and tending, skimmer operations,


VERSION       1         CLASSIFICATION:   CONTROLLING    AREA PLANNING    ISSUING     SECTOR
 DATE      01MAR07      UNCLASSIFIED       AUTHORITY      COMMITTEE      AUTHORITY   COMMANDER     PAGE      9400-13
          shoreline cleanup and logistical support, personnel levels expected to reach 1000 within the first
          week and stabilize at up to about 5000 within 3 weeks depending on the extent of shoreline impacts.

          4. Miscellaneous personnel: Wildlife rescue efforts can be expected to draw over 300 volunteers.
          The additional requirements for salvage operations, investigations, and similar efforts cannot be
          projected with any accuracy.

  Response: A spill of this magnitude located in the environmentally sensitive areas of the Florida Keys will
  involve government agencies at all levels and create intense public interest. There will also be a significant
  local monetary impact due to the majority of the economy being connected to the tourism industry. This
  incident meets the criteria as a Spill of National Significance (SONS); the OSC should request that
  designation and activation of the SONS organizational structure. Initially, the Incident Command
  System/Unified Command will be established however, as the response progresses, the SONS
  organizational structure will likely be implemented. The most critical administrative task is getting the
  representatives from the many government agencies on line so there is a minimum delay in implementing
  the initial response strategy. With the large number of involved agencies, each with their own
  responsibilities, without proper coordination every issue has the potential to become a point of conflict.
  The most critical operational task is the rapid procurement of fire boom or dispersant equipment if in-situ
  burning or dispersants is to be effectively employed.

  The primary response to the event would be the initial use of all Sector Key personnel. This would be
  enough to provide three cutters, four boat crews, two land based pollution investigation teams, two casualty
  investigators and personnel to man the Operations Center and start contacting additional resources needed
  to assist. Personnel qualified to conduct pollution investigations and monitor cleanup operations would
  have to be accessed through Seventh Coast Guard District DRAT. Support in the way of Coast Guard
  resources to combat the vessel fires and conduct over-flights would have to be provided by Seventh Coast
  Guard District Command Center. The response time for the Sector to be fully manned and operational at
  the Incident Command Post could take as long as 2 hours. Support personnel from the Gulf Strike Team
  historically take 4-6 hours to arrive without equipment. Reservists are locally available but funding to
  provide them for significant events in the past has not been forthcoming. Expect as many as 10 to
  volunteer their services part time at no cost. TAD personnel from other Seventh Coast Guard District units
  could be available within 24 hours.

  The response strategies used will be drawn from the NOAA Scientific Support Coordinator’s (SSC's)
  recommendations and shoreline response strategies listed in NOAA's Shoreline Countermeasures Manual
  for Tropical Coastal Environments. Response strategies by location of the spill are described below:

          1. Offshore: Containment offshore will be accomplished using a combination of fire boom and
          standard open water boom. Unless fire boom is available, the VLCC will not be boomed if still on
          fire and continuing to leak. Once the fire burns out, boom should be deployed around the vessel.
          The oil in the standard boom arrangements away from the vessel will be removed using skimming
          systems. The offshore response strategy is to remove as much oil as possible using in situ burning,
          dispersants and open water skimming.

          2. Nearshore: Very little nearshore boom will be deployed initially. The limited amount of boom
          available will either be used offshore or in the inlets and passages between the islands. As the
          response progresses, sensitive shorelines will be protected as resources become available.

          3. Shoreline: The majority of all boom deployed will be in an effort to prevent the oil from passing
          between the islands into the shallow waters north of the Keys. The boom used must be suitable for
          very shallow water. This operation will be very labor intensive and will require constant monitoring
          of the placements. Planned boom deployment locations are detailed on charts located in Volume II
          of the Area Contingency Plan.


VERSION       1         CLASSIFICATION:   CONTROLLING    AREA PLANNING     ISSUING     SECTOR
 DATE      01MAR07      UNCLASSIFIED       AUTHORITY      COMMITTEE       AUTHORITY   COMMANDER     PAGE      9400-14
          4. Inland: No inland areas are affected.

          5. Sensitive areas: The entire Florida Keys are considered sensitive areas, with most areas being
          designated as marine sanctuaries and/or national/state parks. By using the strategy of offshore
          booming and in-situ burning, it is hoped that the amount of oil reaching the coastline is minimal.
          The deployment of the shoreline boom and skimmers in the inlets is to prevent any oil migrating to
          the shore from reaching the more sensitive areas north of the islands.

  Cleanup: The mechanical cleanup stage of the operation will involve offshore skimming operations and
  cleaning the many miles of docks, sea walls, and beaches that may become impacted. This part of the
  operation is expected to last 3 to 6 months depending on the extent of shoreline impact. The in-situ burning
  stage will operate for no longer than 3 days. After this time, the oil will have dissipated into pockets no
  longer feasible to collect and will have emulsified to an extent that ignition will be very difficult to initiate
  and/or maintain. The larger skimmer systems will be needed for approximately 14 days. After that time,
  the majority of the oil will be on the shoreline and operations will consist mainly of cleaning of beaches
  and man-made shore structures (docks, sea walls, etc.) using sorbents, portable skimmers and pressure
  washers. Significant impacts could occur to mangrove-lined shorelines. The Shoreline Cleanup and
  Assessment Teams (SCAT), the NOAA SSC and the DEP would make recommendations to the FOSC on
  the best approach to clean/protect these sensitive resources. This part of the cleanup could take many
  months and will require hundreds of thousands of feet of sorbent boom and materials.

  Storage and disposal of oil spill generated wastes will become be a significant issue during the incident.
  Numerous waste storage areas will be established with roll-off boxes and Frac. Tanks to store solid and
  liquid product. In addition, barges and OSRV’s will need to be off-loaded to continue response operations.
  Options include local incineration of solid oily waste at the Key West Waste to Energy Plant and
  transporting the material over the road to the landfill in the Keys or mainland landfills or to the Waste to
  Energy Plants in Dade and Broward Counties. Liquid wastes will also likely need to be transported to
  recycling facilities in Dade and Broward Counties. Section 9200 of the Plan contains a list of these
  facilities. The disposal options will be evaluated by the Disposal Supervisor of the Planning Section and
  coordinated with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection representative.

  A determination will have to be made as to when the cleanup is considered complete. The FOSC will
  solicit guidance from the SSC and the state and the National Marine Sanctuaries representative before
  making his decision. The decision will be based on over-flight information, the feasibility of continuing oil
  removal operations offshore, the daily recovery rate of operating skimmers, and the amount of oil
  remaining on the impacted shorelines. At some point in the operation, the removal actions will cause more
  damage to the environment than the oil presents.



  9442 HAZMAT Release Scenarios
  This section details the Hazardous Materials Release Scenarios considered in developing the Hazardous
  Materials Annex to this plan, Annex 7000. The scenarios do not list facility specific information and do
  not include Cameo or Marplot dispersion data. This information is protected and maintained in a separate
  document by Sector Key West.

  9442.1 Facility Scenario – Anhydrous Ammonia Release
  Scenario: A 150 pound cylinder containing anhydrous ammonia is accidentally knocked over while
  conducting maintenance work in the area. The cylinder hits the ground causing a leak in the fill valve. The
  maintenance worker replacing the cylinder is able to escape before being overcome with the ammonia


VERSION       1         CLASSIFICATION:    CONTROLLING     AREA PLANNING     ISSUING      SECTOR
 DATE      01MAR07      UNCLASSIFIED        AUTHORITY       COMMITTEE       AUTHORITY    COMMANDER     PAGE      9400-15
  fumes. All of the remaining ammonia in the tank (9.67 pounds) escapes from the cylinder within two
  minutes.

  Weather on-scene: winds 15 knots from SE, 78° F, Relative Humidity is 75%

  Primary Concerns: The primary concern is a release of toxic gases and the resulting inhalation hazard to
  population centers. Level A PPE.

  Hazard Assessment: Hazardous Products
  Products Involved: Anhydrous Ammonia

          AMMONIA, anhydrous
          CAS number(s): 7664-41-1                               UNNA number: 1005

          General Description
          Anhydrous ammonia is a colorless to milky white liquid when stored and shipped as a compressed
          liquefied gas. When released on land, the liquid will boil (rapidly vaporize) producing large
          amounts of a colorless gas that is lighter than air. When released in water, the ammonia cold liquid
          will float and boil when initially released. The majority of the spilled liquid ammonia will go into
          solution with the receiving water, but a portion will also be lost as a gas. When released from a
          tank under pressure, the cold ammonia gas will freeze water droplet in the air, causing what looks
          as a white puff. The cold dense gas will initially be heavier than air. The gas has a sharp irritating
          odor at low concentrations. In liquid form, it is infinitely soluble in water, but will float and boil
          when initially released.

          Refrigerated ammonia at –26 deg F. Not at much pressure as relief valve is set at 3 psi.

          Physical and Chemical Properties
          Vapor Density= 0.771 g/L @ 0˚ C (lighter than air, but behaves as heavy gas when released as
          liquid ammonia)
          Vapor Pressure= 8.5 atmospheres
          Water Solubility= 34% (highly soluble)
          Molecular Wt.= 17.0 amu
          Boiling Point= -28˚ F
          Freezing Point= -108˚ F

          Flammability and Reactivity Properties
          Auto ignition Temperature= 1204˚ F
          Lower Explosive Limit= 15%
          Upper Explosive limit= 28%
          Strong oxidizer that reacts with the following compounds:
          Acids
          Halogens
          Salts of silver, zinc, and mercury
          Corrosive to copper and galvanized surfaces

          Fire Hazard
          Ammonia is a combustible gas, although it is difficult to ignite. It is often considered
          nonflammable and is labeled by DOT as a nonflammable gas. Mixtures of ammonia and air will
          explode under favorable conditions, such as in a fire where another fuel source is present and
          burning. Ammonia has a narrow explosion and flammability range (LEL 16% and UEL 25%,
          LFL 15.5 and UFL 27%). Combustion by-products include nitrogen oxides.


VERSION      1        CLASSIFICATION:    CONTROLLING     AREA PLANNING    ISSUING      SECTOR
 DATE     01MAR07     UNCLASSIFIED        AUTHORITY       COMMITTEE      AUTHORITY    COMMANDER      PAGE    9400-16
          Health and Safety
          Contact with liquid ammonia can cause frostbite; therefore, direct physical contact should be
          avoided. Ammonia is a strong irritant, which can cause severe damage to the respiratory tract,
          including death by edema. At concentrations near 5000 ppm, even short periods (a few minutes) of
          exposure to ammonia may be almost immediately fatal due to serious edema, strangulation, and
          asphyxiation. The table below 1 provides a brief description of human health effect at different
          exposures to ammonia.

                           Range of Effects for Exposure to Ammonia

                    Air Concentrations        Duration of                        Effects
                                               Exposure
               < 0.5 ppm                                         Minimal risk level. No noticeable
                                                                 effect

               1 - 20 ppm                                        Noticeable odor, some irritation

               50 ppm                      < 24 hr.              Temporary eye and throat
                                                                 irritation, coughing.

               300 ppm                                           IDLH, strong irritation even
                                                                 during short exposure durations

               5000 ppm                    < 30 minutes          Kills quickly



          Exposure Limits
          Occupational exposure limits
          Threshold Limit Value (TLV)
          Time Weighted Average (TWA) for 8 hours: 25 ppm
          TLV Short term Exposure Limit (STEL) for 15 minutes: 35 ppm
          ERPGs: ERPG-1: 25 ppm.ERPG-2: 150 ppm, ERPG-3: 750 ppm

          Personal Protection
          Respirator Recommendations (NIOSH)
          Up to 250 ppm: (APF = 10) Any chemical cartridge respirator with cartridge(s) providing
          protection against the compound of concern. Any supplied-air respirator.

          Up to 300 ppm: (APF = 25) Any supplied-air respirator operated in a continuous-flow mode. Any
          powered, air-purifying respirator with cartridge(s) providing protection against the compound of
          concern. Any chemical cartridge respirator with a full-facepiece and cartridge(s) providing
          protection against the compound of concern. Any air-purifying, full-facepiece respirator (gas
          mask) with a chin-style, front- or back-mounted canister providing protection against the
          compound of concern. Any self-contained breathing apparatus with a full facepiece. Any supplied-
          air respirator with a full facepiece.

          Emergency or planned entry into unknown concentrations or IDLH conditions: Any self-contained
          breathing apparatus that has a full facepiece and is operated in a pressure-demand or other




VERSION      1         CLASSIFICATION:   CONTROLLING   AREA PLANNING    ISSUING       SECTOR
 DATE     01MAR07      UNCLASSIFIED       AUTHORITY     COMMITTEE      AUTHORITY     COMMANDER      PAGE   9400-17
           positive-pressure mode. Any supplied-air respirator that has a full facepiece and is operated in a
           pressure-demand or other positive-pressure mode in combination with an auxiliary self-contained
           positive-pressure breathing apparatus.

           Escape: (APF = 50) Any air-purifying, full-face piece respirator (gas mask) with a chin-style,
           front- or back-mounted canister providing protection against the compound of concern. Any
           appropriate escape-type, self-contained breathing apparatus

           Protective clothing (NIOSH)
           For 8 hours: Butyl, Teflon, Viton, Responder, Trellchem, Tychem
           For 4 hours: Nitrile

           Sampling
           Real-time air sampling for ammonia may be done by colorimetric tubes (Drager or similar) and by
           hand-held instruments utilizing electro-chemical sensors (e.g. GasTech Genesis, and others)

           Risk assessment
           The primary concern is human health hazard and safety both at the site and the surrounding
           population for potential air hazard.



  9442.2 Facility Scenario – Liquefied Petroleum Gas
  (Propane) Release
  Scenario: A 30,000 gallon liquid propane tank experiences a corrosion-related failure in the tank
  approximately 12 inched from the tank bottom. As the propane begins to escape, the hole continues to open
  to a diameter of 2-inches. The tank is 81% full at the time of the release. The release occurs over a 1 hour
  period discharging 99,416 pounds of LPG at a rate of 1,900 pounds/minute.

  Weather on-scene: winds 15 knots from NW, 78° F, Relative Humidity is 75%

  Hazard Assessment: Hazardous Products
  Products Involved: Propane


           LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS, Propane
           CAS number(s): 74-98-6                                         UNNA number: 1978/1961

           General Description
           A colorless, odorless gas (extremely flammable) or liquid that contains a mixture of butane,
           isobutene, propylene, butylenes and other hydrocarbons of low molecular weight that is refined
           from petroleum. Maintained as liquid under pressure. Leaking vessels can release either the liquid,
           which quickly vaporizes, or the gaseous mixture. The gas is heavier than air. A flame can flash
           back to the source of the leak very easily. Under prolonged exposure to heat the containers may
           rupture violently and rocket.

           Physical and Chemical Properties
           Vapor Density= 1.52
           Vapor Pressure= 208 PSIA @ 37.8 C (max.)
           Water Solubility= Slightly
           Molecular Wt.= 44.9 amu
           Boiling Point= -43.8˚ F


VERSION      1        CLASSIFICATION:    CONTROLLING    AREA PLANNING    ISSUING      SECTOR
 DATE     01MAR07     UNCLASSIFIED        AUTHORITY      COMMITTEE      AUTHORITY    COMMANDER     PAGE     9400-18
          Freezing Point= -305.9˚ F

          Flammability and Reactivity Properties
          Auto ignition Temperature= 842˚ F
          Lower Explosive Limit= 2.2%
          Upper Explosive limit= 9.5%

          Fire Hazard
          Extremely flammable. Will be easily ignited by heat, sparks or flames. Will form explosive mixtures
          with air. Vapors from liquefied gas are initially heavier than air and spread along ground. Vapors
          may travel to source of ignition and flash back. Containers may explode when heated. Ruptured
          cylinders may rocket.

          Health and Safety
          Contact with liquid propane can cause frostbite and burns; therefore, direct physical contact should
          be avoided. The systemic toxicity of this substance has not been determined. However, it should
          be practically non-toxic to internal organs if it gets on the skin. This material can act as a simple
          asphyxiant by displacement of air. Signs and symptorns of the resultant central nervous system
          effects may include rapid breathing, in coordination, rapid fatigue, excessive salivation,
          disorientation, headache, nausea and vomiting. Convulsions, loss of consciousness, coma and/or
          death may occur if exposure to high concentrations continues.

          Exposure Limits
          Occupational exposure limits
          Threshold Limit Value (TLV): 1000 ppm
          Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health (IDLH): 2000 ppm
          TEELs: TEEL-1: 2000 ppm. TEEL-2: 2000 ppm, TEEL-3: 2000 ppm

          Personal Protection
          EYE PROTECTION:
          Appropriate eye protection must be worn when working with this material or serious harm can
          result. Wear chemical goggles and a face shield at all times.

          SKIN PROTECTION:
          Do not get on skin or on clothing. Wear protective clothing including gloves when handling.

          RESPIRATORY PROTECTION:
          No special respiratory protection is normally required.
          VENTILATION:
          Use adequate ventilation to keep the airborne concentrations of this material below the
          recommended exposure standard. Emergency or planned entry into unknown concentrations or
          IDLH conditions: Any self-contained breathing apparatus that has a full facepiece and is operated
          in a pressure-demand or other positive-pressure mode. Any supplied-air respirator that has a full
          facepiece and is operated in a pressure-demand or other positive-pressure mode in combination
          with an auxiliary self-contained positive-pressure breathing apparatus.

          Risk assessment
          Extremely flammable product. Therefore, the primary concern is fire and explosion hazards
          associated with leak of propane from its storage container. Vapors may spread along the ground to
          ignition source and flash back to storage container. Prolonged exposure to heat may cause the
          container to explode.




VERSION      1        CLASSIFICATION:    CONTROLLING    AREA PLANNING    ISSUING      SECTOR
 DATE     01MAR07     UNCLASSIFIED        AUTHORITY      COMMITTEE      AUTHORITY    COMMANDER     PAGE     9400-19
  9443 Marine Firefighting Scenarios
  Refer to Annex 8000 of this plan.

  9444 Salvage Scenarios
  Refer to Section 4770 of this plan.

  9445 Weapons of Mass Destruction Scenarios
  Refer to Appendix 9800 of this plan.




VERSION      1         CLASSIFICATION:   CONTROLLING   AREA PLANNING    ISSUING     SECTOR
 DATE     01MAR07      UNCLASSIFIED       AUTHORITY     COMMITTEE      AUTHORITY   COMMANDER   PAGE   9400-20

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:0
posted:10/12/2012
language:English
pages:20