cont'd. - Carr Allison

Document Sample
cont'd. - Carr Allison Powered By Docstoc
					                                        C ARR A LLISON
                                        T R A N S P O RTAT I O N N E W S L E T T E R
                                              An Update on Alabama Trucking
                                          As of January 1, 2007, all Alabama intrastate motor carriers must have and
Winter Issue—2007                         display a U.S. DOT Number and the company name on all commercial motor
                                          vehicles. All such entities will be required to register with, and will be moni-
INSIDE THIS ISSUE:                        tored by, the United States Department of Transportation. This requirement
                                          will include all vehicles operating with a combined (truck and trailer) GVWR of
                                          10,001 lbs. or more. As an example, local lawn care/landscaping companies
                                          that operate one-ton pickup trucks and/or 3/4-ton pickup trucks and haul trail-
An Update on Alabama                1     ers substantial enough to carry commercial mowers will likely be subject to
Trucking Law
                                          the DOT reporting requirements (depending on the size and weight of the
                                          trailer) and will be required to display their DOT Numbers on their vehicles.
Recent Decisions                    2     For the most part, these vehicles have historically been able to “fly under the
                                          radar” of regulation. The DOT will now keep track of these entities’ recordable
Recent Verdicts                     3     incidents and will post their Safer Stat profile on the FMCSA’s Safety and Fit-
                                          ness Electronic Records (SAFER) System.

Carr Allison News                   5             The Alabama Department of Public Safety (ADPS) defines intrastate
                                          commerce as: “Any trade, traffic, or transportation beginning and ending
                                          within the boundaries of this state [Alabama].” When speaking to the issue of
                                          why they chose to require DOT registration for small intrastate carriers, the
                                          ADPS had the following to say:

                                                 The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) were
                                                 adopted by Alabama in 1987 (§ 32-9A-2). Those regulations have long
                                                 required the legal name of the company and the USDOT # to be dis-
                                                 played on both sides of the vehicle. This action will serve to bring Ala-
                                                 bama into compliance with a program known as Performance and
 Alabama State Bar Associa-                      Registration Information Systems Management (PRISM).
 tion rules require the follow-
 ing disclosure: "No represen-
 tation is made that the qual-
 ity of legal services to be per-
 formed is greater than the               (PRISM) is a cooperative Federal-State safety program developed to reduce
 quality of legal services per-           commercial vehicle accidents. PRISM is intended to utilize the commercial
 formed by other lawyers."                vehicle registration process of the States to improve motor carrier safety in
                                          two ways:

                                          1.      By determining the safety fitness of the motor carrier prior to issuing
                                          license plates; and

                                          2.     By motivating the carrier to improve its safety performance either
                                          through an improvement process or the application of registration sanctions.
      An Update on Alabama Trucking Law (cont’d.)
        Via PRISM, the State commercial vehicle registration program ensures that no vehicle is plated with-
out identifying the responsible carrier for vehicle safety during the registration year. In addition, the use of
registration sanctions provides incentive for unsafe carriers to improve their safety performance. Those motor
carriers that have been or would be prohibited from operating in interstate commerce by the Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Administration may be denied registration by the State.

         The fact that smaller commercial vehicles will now be required to have a DOT number does not mean
that their drivers will necessarily need to obtain a Commercial Driver’s License (CDL). The rule for CDL re-
quirements remains the same – you do not have to have a CDL to operate a commercial vehicle if the GVWR
is less than 26,001 lbs. However, driver’s of the following types of vehicles fall under exceptions to the gen-
eral rule and are required to maintain a valid CDL:

          1.    A vehicle designed to transport 16 or more passengers, including the driver; or
          2.    Any sized vehicle that is used in the transportation of hazardous materials as defined by the

Aside from being forced to comply with the FMCSRs, the compliance impact on newly covered businesses
should be minimal. There is no charge for obtaining the intrastate US DOT number. Separate vehicles
owned and operated by the same entity will not require separate numbers. A single number will be issued for
the company. All vehicles with a combined GVWR of 10,0001 lbs. or more within that company will use that
number. The DOT number and legal name (as registered on the MCS-150 application) must be displayed on
such vehicles by magnetic signs, paint or stickers. The FMCSRs direct that the number is to, “appear on
both sides of the self-propelled CMV; [and] be in letters that contrast sharply in color with the background on
which the letters are placed.”

      Additional information regarding compliance with this requirement can be found at the Alabama
Department of Public Safety Website:

Recent Decisions
Under what circumstances can a company be responsible for the activities of the transportation company it
hires to ship its products?
        Stewart v. Lofton Timber Co., LLC & Georgia Pacific Corp., 943 So. 2d 729 (Miss. Nov. 7, 2006).

         Facts: The Stewarts were injured in a collision with a log truck owned by Nickerson, the driver. He parked his
truck at Lofton Timber Company, LLC, where Georgia Pacific Corporation kept wood for hauling by drivers, such as
Nickerson. Plaintiff sued Lofton and Georgia Pacific. Lofton denied that Nickerson was its employee.

         Nickerson owned his own trucks. Lofton offered a set rate of pay for hauling wood, which Nickerson was at lib-
erty to accept or refuse. While the equipment for loading the wood was owned by Lofton, the trucks to haul the wood
were Nickerson’s. Nickerson hired his own drivers, ran background checks on them, prepared the routes that they
would take, and determined how many hauls per day the drivers would make. Nickerson hired and fired his own em-
ployees. Nickerson paid his own employees. Lofton Timber Company only insured that the trucks were within the legal
weight limit when they left the facility. Lofton in addition would advise Nickerson as to which truck should go to what
Georgia Pacific plant. Lofton would pay Nickerson as a contractor, not an employee.

         Analysis: The Mississippi Court of Appeals held that under the facts, Lofton simply had no control over how
Nickerson did the work he was assigned. Nickerson had the right to and did determine the details of the work, under the
ten part test of control cited. Further, since Lofton was not an employer of Nickerson, no analysis was needed to see if
Georgia Pacific was an employer of Lofton, who then employed Nickerson. Thus, summary judgment was appropriate for
both Lofton and Georgia Pacific.

 Page 2
Recent Decisions
Is a trucking employer liable for workers’ compensation benefits due to the breakdown of a truck, where the em-
ployee becomes intoxicated during the wait?

        Total Transportation of Mississippi, Inc. v. Shores, 2006 Miss. App. LEXIS 874 (Miss. Ct. App. Nov. 21, 2006).

        Facts: A husband and wife truck driving team stopped in Laramie, Wyoming, for truck repairs. The wife han-
dled getting the truck to a truck repair shop, leaving her husband at a Sinclair truck center, which had a bar. The wife
could not find the husband upon her return a few hours later, although she did not check the bar itself. After waiting sev-
eral more hours and looking for him, she began to drive the truck herself back to Jackson, Mississippi.

         Meanwhile, the husband went to Foster’s Bar in the Sinclair Truck Center. He was there for a period of eleven
hours. During that period, while he had a meal, he consumed enough alcohol to make him legally drunk. He also played
pool during that period of time. At 2:00 AM, when the bar closed, the husband requested a man to take him to the Petro
Center where the husband thought the truck was being repaired. In the parking lot, the man pulled a gun on the hus-
band demanding money. The husband got in the car with the man, but jumped out as the car approached the Petro
station. The man then shot and killed the husband.

         The widow filed for workers’ compensation benefits as to the death of her husband, and the Mississippi Workers’
Compensation Commission granted them. The Mississippi Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the husband’s level
of intoxication was so great that he could not have legally re-entered employment as a truck driver for some period of
time after his death. The Court found that his eleven hour drinking binge, during which he spent his paycheck on alco-
hol, deviated materially from his employment.

         The Court also found that the husband’s death was not related to his employment as a truck driver. The Court
determined that the husband’s status as a truck driver was not the reason the other person robbed and shot him. In-
stead, that decision more likely had to do with the victim husband’s state of intoxication and the fact that he had signifi-
cant sums of money on him. Furthermore, the husband was not located on the general truck stop grounds which much
of the events occurred, but rather in the bar located on the grounds. The positional risk doctrine, which applies to em-
ployees who have to work in dangerous areas, would not apply to a bar on a truck stop grounds under these circum-

                                             Recent Verdicts
 1) Kennedy v. Steve Thompson Log-          a verdict for Bowen and Steve              driving a tractor-trailer. Accordingly,
 ging, LLC (Etowah County Circuit           Thompson Logging.                          Ray blamed Miller for the crash, and
 Court; December 1, 2005, Judge Milli-                                                 Billy Barnes Enterprises for negli-
 can). On January 24, 2002, Jeffrey                                                    gently entrusting a tractor-trailer to
 Bowen was driving a tractor-trailer for             2) Ray v. Billy Barnes Enter-
                                                                                       Miller. Miller initially argued that he
 his employer, Steve Thompson Log-          prises (Macon County Circuit Court;
                                                                                       had gotten a special waiver in order
 ging, LLC. He was traveling near the       February 10, 2006, Judge Young).
                                                                                       to obtain his CDL, but Ray argued
 intersection of Sardis Cutoff Road and     On May 21, 2003, David Miller, age
                                                                                       that Miller had only been able to get
 Gamble Street in Etowah County.            47, was driving a tractor-trailer
                                                                                       a CDL by concealing his limitations
 Patricia Kennedy was also driving in       owned by his employer, Billy Barnes
                                                                                       from the physician who examined
 the same area. Both parties reached        Enterprises. Miller was traveling on
                                                                                       him. Ultimately, defendants admitted
 the intersection at the same time, and     US 80 near the intersection with
                                                                                       fault for the crash, and the court di-
 there was an encounter of some kind        Brown Street in Macon County. An
                                                                                       rected the jury to return a verdict for
 between the two. As a result, Ken-         instant later, he collided with a vehi-
                                                                                       Ray on liability. Ray was awarded
 nedy’s vehicle left the road and hit a     cle being driven by Howard Ray, age
                                                                                       $1,500,000 in compensatory dam-
 concrete drain covering. Kennedy           45. Ray filed suit against Miller and
                                                                                       ages, and an additional $2,000,000
 claimed injuries to her neck, back,        Billy Barnes Enterprises for undis-
                                                                                       in punitive damages.
 and foot, as well as assorted cuts and     closed injuries and medical ex-
 bruises. She filed suit against Bowen      penses. Miller, it turned out, was
 for causing the accident, and she          legally blind in his left eye, and also             3) Nisbet v. Heartland Ex-
 claimed negligent entrustment by           had a history of fainting, dizziness,      press (United States District Court
 Steve Thompson Logging. The case           alcohol abuse, and cardiac prob-           for the Middle District of Alabama,
 was tried in Gadsden and resulted in       lems. Ray argued that those facts          Southern Division; January 31, 2007,
                                            should have disqualified Miller from       Judge Watkins). This case involved
                                                                                                                       Page 3
Recent Verdicts (cont’d.)
a motor vehicle accident between two       ery truck struck the plaintiff while it     sity instructor and claimed a mild
tractor-trailers. The defendant truck      was backing up to unload goods.             traumatic brain injury, post-
driver rear-ended the plaintiff truck      The plaintiff was talking on his cell       concussion syndrome, and verbal
driver, not realizing that the plaintiff   phone and was assigned 50% of the           memory and processing speed defi-
had stopped. The plaintiff suffered        liability under Florida’s comparative       cits. The plaintiff suffered these
neck and low back injuries, with no        negligence scheme.                          claimed injuries when an empty log
surgical intervention. His medical ex-                                                 truck rear-ended his vehicle. The
penses were $18,500.00. The plaintiff                                                  truck's speed at impact was in dis-
                                                     3) O'Donnell v. Sagamore
brought suit, alleging both negligence                                                 pute. The defendants argued the
                                           Insurance Co. (Santa Rosa County;
and wantonness. The wantonness                                                         low speed and impact could not have
                                           May 2006). This case resulted in a
claim was based upon evidence that                                                     resulted in the claimed injuries.
                                           $1,000,000 settlement for the plain-
the defendant had been text messag-
                                           tiff, a 47-year-old salesman. A flat
ing on his phone, putting a CD in his
                                           bed tractor trailer driven by the de-                 6) Skop v. White (Palm
disc player, and watching a television
                                           fendant pulled onto a dimly lit high-       Beach County; September 2006).
located in the sleeper cab. The de-
                                           way causing this accident. An acci-         Plaintiff here was a 43-year-old male.
fendant driver did not give a clear ex-
                                           dent reconstructionist suggested the        He sustained a neck injury with pain
planation for why he did not see that
                                           plaintiff was not wearing his seat          radiating into his upper extremity
the plaintiff’s truck had stopped. A
                                           belt. Seat belt non-use increased           after an accident wherein he claimed
federal district court jury sitting in
                                           the severity of his lower extremity         the defendant backed up in front him.
Dothan awarded the plaintiff
                                           injuries, however, the vehicle dam-         The defendant argued the plaintiff
$500,000.00. Of that award,
                                           age suggested one or both of the            could have avoided the accident by
$340,000.00 were for compensatory
                                           lower extremities would have been           the exercise of reasonable care. The
damages, $30,000.00 were for the
                                           severely injured regardless. Another        jury found the plaintiff did not sustain
consortium claim brought by the plain-
                                           factor was the plaintiff’s vehicle’s air    a permanent injury, but awarded the
tiff’s wife, and $130,000.00 were for
                                           bag failed to deploy. The defendant         plaintiff $12,000.00.
punitive damages. After the judgment
                                           argued the plaintiff was speeding.
was entered, the case settled for
                                           The plaintiff’s injuries included a frac-
$478,864.58.                                                                                     7) Hellowell v. Jovi Fleet
                                           tured right tibia, a severe crushing
                                                                                       Transport, Inc. (Broward County;
                                           injury to right leg, and a strong possi-
                                                                                       September 2006) The jury awarded
The following is a summary of recent       bility the lower right leg may require
                                                                                       a $120,250.00 verdict for the plaintiff.
verdicts and settlements in Florida        amputation due to mal-union and
                                                                                       Negligence was split, with 70% being
transportation cases.                      non-union of bone grafts. The plain-
                                                                                       assigned to the defendant. The
                                           tiff had undergone six major surger-
                                                                                       plaintiff was a 64-year-old disabled
          1). Cruz v. Priority America,                                                male. The plaintiff was stopped at a
Inc. & Elliot (Alachua County; April                                                   red light when the defendant drove
2006). This case resulted in a                       4) Phipps v. William F.           across three lanes of traffic striking
$1,200,000.00 settlement for the de-       Hoops, Inc. & Stewart (Duval                the plaintiff’s vehicle. The defendant
cedents’ estate. The decedents were        County; August 2006). In this case,         had just backed up through an inter-
a 34-year-old male, who sold pro-          the plaintiffs were a 38-year-old male      section. The defendant alleged the
duce, and a one month old girl. The        mechanic and a 30-year-old female           plaintiff should have seen him and
accident occurred when Priority Amer-      clerical worker. They claimed neck          avoided the accident. The plaintiff’s
ica’s tractor trailer collided with the    and shoulder injuries following a mo-       injuries included a closed left tibia
plaintiffs' vehicle on I-75 in Gaines-     tor vehicle accident. The plaintiffs        and fibula fracture requiring plates
ville, Florida. Defendants claimed the     were traveling approximately sixty to       and screws, a fractured clavicle, sev-
plaintiff pulled in front of the tractor   sixty-five mph in the right-hand lane       eral fractured toes, and an aggrava-
trailer and caused the accident.           of I-10 East, when their vehicle was        tion of prior back injury.
                                           rear-ended by the defendant. The
                                           jury returned a verdict in favor of the
         2) Trent v. ABF Freight Sys-                                                           8) Hoste v. Gemaire Dis-
                                           plaintiffs for $503,733.27.
tem, Inc. (Duval County, May 2006).                                                    tributors, LLC & Bradley (Palm
The jury awarded $163,179.35 to 30-                                                    Beach County; October 2006). This
year-old male, who installed sound                  5) Sirovy v. Chandler &            case resulted in a $5,000.00 verdict
systems. The plaintiff suffered a frac-    McRae (Alachua County; August               for a 53-year-old female, condomin-
tured tibia, which required surgery to     2006). This case resulted in a              ium association manager. The de-
repair. The injury arose out of an ac-     $250,000.00 settlement for the plain-       fendant rear-ended the plaintiff. Li-
cident in which the defendant’s deliv-     tiff. The plaintiff worked as a univer-     ability was admitted. The plaintiff

                                                                                                                        Page 4
Recent Verdicts (cont’d.)
 claimed a herniated disc at C3-C4 for                                                  tive deficits, but recovered and is
 which surgery was recommended.                          10) Papa v. Sanabria &         currently in college. She was injured
 The defendants alleged a pre-existing        Sanchez (Palm Beach County; No-           when defendant’s tractor trailer T-
 condition. The jury found the plaintiff      vember 2006). The plaintiff in this       boned her vehicle. There was a dis-
 did not suffer a permanent injury, and       case, a 19 year old male, was a pas-      pute over which vehicle ran the red
 therefore, she was only awarded past         senger in a vehicle operated by an-       light.
 medical expenses.                            other driver. The defendant, driving
                                              a tractor trailer, rear-ended the vehi-            12) Hidalgo v. Ingersoll, Ar-
          9) Cummings v. MJ Trucking,         cle. The defendant argued the driver      row Truck Leasing, & Arrow Trucking
 Inc. & Avila (Palm Beach County; No-         swerved, creating a condition where       (Orange County; December 2006).
 vember 2006). Here the defendant             he could not avoid the collision. The     A settlement of $2,175,000.00 was
 paid a $390,000.00 settlement for a          plaintiff’s injuries included a herni-    paid to plaintiffs, including a de-
 45-year-old female, who worked as a          ated disc at L5-S1, which required        ceased 18 year old student. The
 teacher’s aide. She was injured when         surgery. A $437,850.79 verdict was        defendant was traveling at approxi-
 defendant’s tractor trailer backed up        returned by the jury in favor of the      mately 23 mph on the shoulder of I-
 and impacted her vehicle. The defen-         plaintiff.                                10 because of a blown turbo. There
 dant alleged the plaintiff drove into the                                              was smoke billowing from the tractor
 rear of the tractor trailer. The plaintiff           11) Doe v. Anonymous              trailer. Allegedly, the defendant
 claimed she suffered a herniated disc        Trucking Co. (Duval County; Decem-        pulled into the path of the plaintiffs
 at C4-C5 which required fusion and           ber 2006). In this case, the parties      causing their vehicle to rear-end the
 required removal of a spur in her left       entered into a $750,000.00 settle-        tractor-trailer. The deceased plaintiff
 shoulder. Defendant also argued that         ment for the plaintiff, who was a 18-     failed to wear her seat belt.
 the plaintiff’s injuries were degenera-      year-old female student. She suf-
 tive in nature.                              fered a closed head injury with cogni-

                                        Carr Allison News
        David K. Howard has been selected by the Alabama State Bar to serve as a mentor in a new pro-
gram for newly admitted members of the Bar. This program is designed to provide support and networking for
newly admitted bar members; foster relationships that encourage new members to seek and receive helpful
guidance on professional matters; provide mentors opportunities to meet and interact with new members of
the bar; and increase professionalism and collegiality within the State Bar. David is a shareholder in the Flor-
ence office of Carr Allison. David has had an extensive litigation practice for over thirty years. David currently
serves on the Board of Directors of the Alabama Defense Lawyers Association.

       Tom Oliver will be the chair of the March of Dimes for 2007 and 2008. Tom is also speaking at the
Hall Booth - Carr Allison joint seminar in late March.

         Joe Driver and Brett Ross recently obtained a decision from the Alabama Supreme Court which
changed Alabama law regarding an insurer’s right to void a policy based upon misrepresentations in an insur-
ance application. Under the prior law, material misrepresentations by an insured could only be used to defeat
coverage if the loss occurred during the initial policy period. For any loss which arose during a renewal policy
period, the insurer could not defend coverage based upon material misrepresentations in the application,
even if those misrepresentations were directly related to the risk insured. In Quality Casualty Insurance Co.
v. Ruben, the Supreme Court overruled the prior law and held that material misrepresentations in an applica-
tion for insurance can be a defense to coverage even if the loss occurred under a renewal policy.

       Melisa Zwilling spoke recently at the American Bar Association's meeting in Naples, Florida, con-
cerning Medicare Set-asides.

Page 5
                                                       Carr Allison
      Name                  Telephone           Email            Resident Office
Daniel R. Alexander       (205) 949-2906    Birmingham, AL
Russell Q. Allison        (205) 949-2954    Birmingham, AL
Douglas Bagwell           (228) 864-1060    Gulfport, MS
Christopher Barkas        (850) 222-2107     Tallahassee, FL
Alan K. Bellenger         (205) 949-2918    Birmingham, AL
Ryan G. Brake             (256) 718-6040    Florence, AL      Birmingham Office
Kimberly M. Brannon       (205) 949-2902    Birmingham, AL    100 Vestavia Parkway, Ste 200
P. David Brannon          (850) 222-2107    Tallahassee, FL
Gregory A. Brockwell      (205) 949-2916    Birmingham, AL
                                                                                     Birmingham, Alabama 35216
Bradley J. Cain           (205) 949-2911    Birmingham, AL     205-822-2006
Thomas L. Carpenter       (228) 864-1060    Gulfport, MS
Charles F. Carr           (251) 626-9340    Mobile, AL
Regina F. Cash            (251) 626-9340    Mobile, AL
Thomas S. Creel           (205) 949-2932    Birmingham, AL    Dothan Office
Kathy R. Davis            (205) 949-2953    Birmingham, AL    256 Honeysuckle Road, Ste 6
Shaun A. DeCoudres        (205) 949-2933    Birmingham, AL
                                                                                    Dothan, Alabama 36305
Christopher E. Dorough    (205) 949-2952    Birmingham, AL
Joseph H. Driver          (205) 949-2951    Birmingham, AL    334-712-6459
D. Greg Dunagan           (251) 626-9340    Mobile, AL
John J. Geer              (205) 949-2914    Birmingham, AL
Chad S. Godwin            (205) 949-2921    Birmingham, AL
Craig W. Goolsby          (251) 626-9340    Mobile, AL
                                                                                    Gulfport Office
William B. Graham         (850) 222-2107    Tallahassee, FL   14231 Seaway Road
Benjamin R. Graves        (256) 718-6040    Florence, AL
                                                                                    Gulfport, Mississippi 39503
Jason G. Hale             (205) 949-2941    Birmingham, AL
Claude M. Harden          (850) 222-2107    Tallahassee, FL   228-864-1060
Debra K. Hornbuckle       (205) 949-2912     Birmingham, AL
David K. Howard           (256) 718-6040    Florence, AL
Glenn E. Ireland          (205) 949-2948    Birmingham, AL
Devona L. Johnson         (205) 949-2947    Birmingham, AL
                                                                                    Tallahassee Office
Jennifer N. Johnson       (205) 949-2903    Birmingham, AL    305 Gadsden Street
Allan S. Jones            (205) 949-2926    Birmingham, AL    Tallahassee, Florida 32301
Douglas P. Jones          (850) 222-2107    Tallahassee, FL   850-222-2107
Elizabeth J. Kanter       (205) 949-2908    Birmingham, AL
Brandi M. Kellis          (205) 949-2915    Birmingham, AL
Darren W. Kies            (205) 949-2993    Birmingham, AL
Donald (Bo) Kirkpatrick   (205) 949-2946    Birmingham, AL
                                                                                    Florence Office
William P. Lawler         (205) 949-2905    Birmingham, AL
Tara W. Lockett           (251) 626-9340    Mobile, AL        212 South Cedar Street
Thomas C. Logan           (205) 949-2944    Birmingham, AL    Florence, Alabama 35630
Marilyn N. Lyles          (251) 626-9340    Mobile, AL
David L. McAlister        (205) 949-2934    Birmingham, AL    256-718-6040
Richard C. McFarlain      (850) 222-2107    Tallahassee, FL
H. Lester McFatter, Jr.   (850) 222-2107    Tallahassee, FL
Hal R. Mardenborough      (850) 222-2107    Tallahassee, FL
                                                                                    Mobile Office
Vincent A. Noletto        (251) 626-9340    Mobile, AL
Thomas L .Oliver          (205) 949-2942    Birmingham, AL    6251 Monroe Street
Adam W. Overstreet        (251) 626-9340    Mobile, AL        Daphne, Alabama 36526
Sean C. Pierce            (205) 949-2930    Birmingham, AL    251-626-9340
Caroline T. Pryor         (251) 626-9340    Mobile, AL
Bennett L. Pugh           (205) 949-2940    Birmingham, AL
Grahame M. Read           (205) 949-2924    Birmingham, AL
Rebecca B. Redmond        (205) 949-2917    Birmingham, AL
Lea Richmond, IV          (205) 949-2919    Birmingham, AL
Brett A. Ross             (205) 949-2938    Birmingham, AL
Thomas J. Segrest         (205) 949-2955    Birmingham, AL
Mary B. Shaw              (228) 864-1060    Gulfport, MS
William H. Sisson         (251) 626-9340    Mobile, AL
Jay A. Stewart            (205) 949-2937    Birmingham, AL
Christina L. Tabereaux    (205) 949-2992    Birmingham, AL
Jason C. Taylor           (850) 222-2107    Tallahassee, FL
Jeremy P. Taylor          (251) 626-9340    Mobile, AL
Ellen C. Thompson         (850) 222-2107    Tallahassee, FL
Thomas S. Thornton        (205) 949-2936    Birmingham, AL
Missy Torgerson           (205) 949-2006    Birmingham, AL
Christopher C. Torres     (850) 222-2107    Tallahassee, FL
Richard E. Trewhella      (205) 949-2922    Birmingham, AL
Jeremy N. Trousdale       (205) 949-2935    Birmingham, AL
Adam V. Vickers           (205) 949-2920    Birmingham, AL
Eric M. Wade              (334) 712-6459    Dothan, AL
Leigh J. Weaver           (205) 949-2925    Birmingham, AL
Ann H. Weissmann          (205) 949-2931    Birmingham, AL
Brandi Williams           (205) 949-2943    Birmingham, AL
Melisa C. Zwilling        (205) 949-2949    Birmingham, AL

Shared By: