Austerity Deaths of Sick and Disabled people in the United Kingdom

Document Sample
Austerity Deaths of Sick and Disabled people in the United Kingdom Powered By Docstoc
					 Tel: 0161 XXX XXXX                                                             Mr XXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                                                      1X XXXXXXXXXX
                                                                                    NXXXXXXXXXX XX

                                                                                    4th October, 2012.

To: Mrs. Fatou Bensouda, ICC Prosecutor
Information and Evidence Unit
Office of the Prosecutor
International Criminal Court
Post Office Box 19519
2500 CM The Hague
The Netherlands

Dear Mrs. Bensouda,

                  Subject: Austerity deaths of sick and disabled people in the U.K.

I refer to the recent letter forwarded to you by Mr Samuel Miller of Montreal, Canada, dated 22 nd
September, 2012. Like Mr Miller, I am also deeply concerned about the current policies of the
incumbent Conservative Party in the UK. I do not profess to be an expert on disability rights issues; I
am simply an ordinary 61 year old disabled UK resident despairing at the carnage being unleashed
on my fellow citizens; the unemployed, the sick and the disabled. Policies so pernicious and
vindictive in design, they are threatening the very livelihoods of some of the most vulnerable in our
society causing misery and mental anguish in every corner the UK.

It is my contention, as laid out in the substantial evidence below that warrants immediate forensic
examination. Latest figures have revealed an average of 32 people per week have either committed
suicide or died in each of the past 3-4 years as a result of the Welfare Reform Bill recently
introduced. (Updated today to 73 people, see: )It is difficult to
decide whether the effects deserve labelling as either ‘Genocide’ or a policy of implicit ‘Eugenics’ in
nature and intent or simply ‘Inhumane’ as the barest minimum of assertions. I implore you to treat
my accusations against the named members of Government, past and current, with speed, efficiency
and determination to bring justice in the ICC to the perpetrators of these crimes.

Humanity and The Right to Life deserve respect and protection throughout the world, and especially
in a so called democratic society such as ours, where leaders in government preach about rights and
responsibilities to others. So, they should be held accountable to uphold those same values before
criticizing others. Though the evidence below relates to current Government Ministers, by
association, I also implicate Mr James Purnell, MP Ex Cabinet Minister and former Works and
Pensions Secretary of State in the previous Labour administration for design of policies which were
the forerunner to current legislation and Mr Liam Byrne, MP, the current Labour Shadow Work and
Pensions Secretary, of complicity in the continuation of the abhorrent policies still in practice under
the current Conservative administration.
                 David Cameron: The Rise of the Fourth Reich & The Silent Pogroms
“This whole series of video links below, trace David Cameron's inhumane diabolic record to date.
The Second Episode focuses more on Mr Cameron's on going sadistic agenda at home. It is
important to note that this is no longer just a "political" issue, but it is absolutely critical that it is
viewed as a "Human" issue. To understand this better, I have explained the Hegelian Dialectic in the
film. Mr Cameron has adopted his PR background to divide this into political ideologies. Divide &
Conquer is an old strategy to distract the people from a hidden agenda. We must be prepared to
apply a term that we are culturally taught to avoid in its application to politics, that term being,
Having researched and investigated the subject material in these films, forms only a small part of the
almost 30 years of interest in the subject matter. I had to think cautiously before using the term,
`Evil' and considered using the word `malevolent' as a more socially acceptable term. However, since
the corporate controlled media dare not apply it, I had to take the risk in the definition of the
subject. Evil is a master of deception, so we either don't notice it, or avoid acknowledging it. Denial
seems to be an easy option. However, at some point when it is right in our faces, it may be too late
to turn back. "Our Silence Is Consent"
The films, reveal the untold story of David Cameron and the current NeoLiberalistic Conservative
Government. It is an exposé of what the mainstream corporate media will not tell you and a
revelation of what is being kept from the public about the atrocities and the increasing human rights
abuses by David Cameron on the citizens of the UK. The films also feature disturbing atrocities
abroad, beyond our attention. New draconian laws have been introduced in the UK that are not
brought into the public domain and are only mentioned by the media beyond the reach of prime tv

David Cameron has a private agenda to serve only the banking elite and to sacrifice anyone and
everybody who gets in the way. Few ever question where Government gets its money from, since
we have for some considerable time assumed that the Government issues and distributes its own
`sovereign' currency to the people it is supposed to serve. Whoever holds the finances of each
nation literally owns the nation, including all its assets, which are held in the European Central Bank,
like a kitty that everyone had contributed to on the understanding that wealth would be distributed
equally from. However, these assets were sold off for profits and interest rates for holding them
radically increased, hence the global debt crisis. No nation can possibly ask for their assets to be
returned and to leave the Euro, since its assets have been devalued, forcing countries such as Greece
to surrender every possible resource including ‘Human Resources’ leading to slavery..

When David Cameron was chosen at a clandestine Bilderberg meeting, the elite banking families
wanted a successor to their bench-warmer, Tony Blair. George Osborne was photographed illegally
attending this meeting, along with Peter Mandelson and regulars, David Rockefeller, representatives
of the Rothschild family and Queen Beatrice of the Netherlands (whose well known Nazi father had
founded the sinister Bilderberg Group). When they chose Cameron, as possibly recommended by
Nathan Rothschild, they wanted someone without reluctance on humanitarian issues and somebody
so ruthless and devoid of any conscience whatsoever, who had no moral or ethical dilemmas. They
wanted someone who enjoyed cruelty and could sell it into society using clandestine methods. David
Cameron was perfect for the job. He was chosen and prepared many years ago, as was Blair.

Understandably, some may challenge this description. Yet, documented historical evidence, dating
back to 1776 and as far back as the crusades provide a detailed diary of world events within an
esoteric agenda. It also traces a bloodline, of which David Cameron belongs to. Another example of
this is Barak Obama and his cousin, political rival, Dick Cheney from the previous Bush
administration. (Obama openly talked about this on a US TV talk show.) Tony Blair himself was a
member of the 1591 Studholme Masonic Order. Every world leader today is either a 32 or 33 degree
Freemason. All the information contained is based on 30 years of my own extensive research, more
of which can be found on my website and planned book”
Published on 12 Jul 2012 by IrishStorm1

Proceeding now to the films themselves, they should be viewed in the outlined chronological order
to make sense of the whole. I should also mention that these films have been downloaded and
copied to Hard Drive and CD format. In the event that any attempt to remove these films from should occur or failure to instigate prosecutions, the CD’s and printed media hard
copies will be distributed to every media outlet available around The World to ensure the exposure
of these ‘Crimes Against Humanity’ / ‘War Crimes’/ ‘Treason’ / ‘Corruption’ allegations. Though
several World Statesmen are implicated in the films and later linked documentation, I am mainly
concerned that the ECHR and ICC immediately investigate the claims as appertaining to the current
UK government and its’ Ministers, namely, David Cameron, Prime Minister of The UK.; George
Osborne, Chancellor of The Exchequer; Iain Duncan-Smith, Secretary of State for Works and
Pensions; Christopher Grayling, Secretary of State for Justice, formerly at the Department of Works
and Pensions; Maria Miller, Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, former Under Secretary
at the Offices of The Department for Works and Pensions and finally Lord Freud, Minister for
Welfare Reform, (in addition to the aforementioned James Purnell MP and Liam Byrne MP.)

Statement By XXXXX XX XXXX dated 4th October, 2012

                           Visual Evidence – Crimes Against Humanity
Part 1 of 7
Part 2 of 7
Part 3 of 7
Part 4 of 7
Part 5 of 7
Part 6 of 7
Part 7 of 7
                                    Visual Evidence – War Crimes
Part 1 of 3
Part 2 of 3 (Visually Harrowing)
Part 3 of 3
In relation to the last 3 films, See Appendix “The Lies That Lead To War”

  Printed and Televisual Media Allegations including, Fraud, Corruption, Cover Up and Breach of
  Parliamentary Code of Conduct which have been abused on a number of occasions and under
 numerous clauses in the Code of Conduct for which MP’s should be recalled, and Crimes against
Link to the full report in the Guardian article above can be found at
…and this about the new Secretary of Health responsible for ‘privatising the NHS’ shows a clear
conflict of interest. It is difficult NOT to assume this border on Corruption at the highest level
Finally this report on the increased demonization and discrimination in the right wing media
against people with disability since the Con/Dem Government came to power, used to justify the
Governments attack on Welfare recipients

                        Printed and Internet Media – Inhumane Treatment
- Report to the UN by Dr Pauline Nolan that the UK is breaching human rights of disabled people,
Here’s the video which supports the article above
and here is the link story to inside housing report above:-

                                 Printed Media – Possible Treason
                                      Internet Media – Corruption
See Article 1 in the above link entitled:-
US and NATO are using WMD’s on Libya each and every day            .(Corroborating the film footage in
Visual Evidence Part 2 of 3 above)
And then read from article 7 further down the same link entitled
Pandora’s Box – Massive Fraud & Tax Evasion all linked to illegal arms
Down to and including article entitled

Pandora’s Box opens up more Grime – Part 8 (Repeat)

                                              In Addition
The Health and Safety Executive
In spite of the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) own (RIDDOR) rules on “reporting cases of death
or major injuries to the enforcing authorities without delay”
…… the HSE have allegedly NEGLECTED and/or IGNORED repeated requests to at LEAST investigate
the dangerous Welfare Reform systems.

Furthermore, the HSE have NEGLECTED and/or IGNORED their statutory responsibilities under the
Health & Safety at Work Act 1974.

The mass of cumulative deaths (over 1100 last year) are allegedly due to the Welfare Reform Death
Scandal, but what is not very well known, is the HSE staff are employed by and answerable to the
Secretary of State for Work & Pensions.

It may be cynical to view this with serious concern, but this fact leads right minded people to see a
conflict of interest. It might fairly be regarded as career suicide for any employee at the HSE to
investigate their employer, the Secretary of State for Work & Pensions as the legally termed “directing
mind”, and the person responsible, should litigation be pursued, for example, under the Corporate
Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007, or indeed any of the various other materially
competent pieces of legislation listed at ….
                  RIDDOR - When do I need to make a report?

                  The Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations.
               Black Triangle Anti-Defamation Campaign in Defence of Disability Rights
Even prestigious London firm of Solicitors, Bindmans, human rights lawyers, are now looking for
anyone who is disabled in any way who has had their benefits refused or removed and exhausted
the appeals process. They are inviting them to put in a claim with them, using legal aid. (Whilst is is
still available, as the government intend reducing substantially the numbers who can claim in the
future) Please email if you would like to be involved.
A final set of messages from one disabled campaigner who has been writing “ A letter a day to No
 10” Downing Street, for over 140 days…almost half a year..without ever the courtesy of a single
reply from David Cameron, Prime Minister of the UK himself; a nation he is duty bound to protect.

I believe our Governments’ actions are also in breach of Nuremberg Principles.
The Law is the Law. Police and Judges are bound by position, duty and oath to uphold International
and Domestic law. At present I would assert they are in breach of the Principles.

                                       Nuremberg Principles

                                         Principle III states
  "The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law
 acted as Head of State or responsible government official does not relieve him from responsibility
                                     under international law."

                                         Principle IV states
 The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve
him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.

   With immediate affect arrest of all of those whose unlawful actions have directly resulted in,
  genocide, war crimes, crimes against peace, crimes against humanity, abuse of Human and Civil
                                         rights and ecocide.
                            This is not a political issue, it is one of law.

Madam,This is just a small amount of evidence I have gathered in the last 4-5 weeks ALONE, there is
much MUCH more over the last 3-4 years. Given the scale of these atrocities, the lives already lost,
and the sheer terror being imposed by the diktat of the incumbent Conservative UK government, I
urge you to take swift and decisive action to bring the perpetrators of these crimes to justice before
more lives are sacrificed on the altar of fraud, greed and corruption, as it is my assertion the UK
Government is in clear violation of the
disabilities/ and especially in relation to New - read our update on the Commission's work on
UNCRPD, published March 2012 (Word)
‘Justice Delayed…Is Justice Denied’
Yours sincerely,

                                     “The Lies That Lead To War”

              How the Government deceived Parliament, HM forces, the media and
               the public into waging illegal wars with Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya.

 “War is essentially an evil thing. Its consequences are not confined to the belligerent states alone,
  but affect the whole world. To initiate a war of aggression therefore, is not only an international
 crime, it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains
                           within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.”
                                 Nuremburg War Crimes Tribunal 1946

The method used by British Governments to persuade the nation to wage war is as old as the hills -
lie repeatedly about the illegality of war. The British Government used the same lie to promote the
  war with Libya as it had done for the wars with Afghanistan and Iraq - that military action by HM
  forces is lawful and authorised by the UN Security Council operating under Chapter VII of the UN

 On March 21st 2011, shortly before 559 MPs voted in favour of illegal military action against Libya,
the UK Government issued a statement making the false claim that the deployment of British forces
against Libya was lawful and authorised by UN Security Council Resolution 1973; their note declared:
   “The Attorney General has been consulted and Her Majesty's Government is satisfied that this
Chapter VII authorisation to use all necessary measures provides a clear and unequivocal legal basis
       for deployment of UK forces and military assets to achieve the resolution's objectives”.
This Government statement, claiming that the armed attack on Libya would be legal, exemplifies the
   way in which British politicians, lawyers and civil servants pervert and break the law. By cross-
   checking Government statements against the laws governing the use of force, it can quickly be
               established that the wars with Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya are all illegal.

                                            The law of war

 The two main legal documents which govern the use of armed force in international affairs are the
 UN Charter and UN General Assembly Resolution 2625. The first lays down the law and the second
                                 explains how to interpret it.

                                           The UN Charter

  The UN Charter is the Statute which lays down the legally binding terms of this agreement in 111
       Articles. Article 2 states the purposes of the United Nations and includes these rules:

 2.3 All members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that
                  international peace, security and justice are not endangered.

 2.4 All members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against
 the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent
                                with the Purposes of the United Nations.

 Chapter VII of the UN Charter (Articles 39 - 51) contains the rules governing the measures that the
         UN Security Council may take to bring about peace and security. Article 41 states:

   The Security Council may decide what measures not involving the use of armed force are to be
  employed to give effect to its decisions, and it may call upon members of the United Nations to
                                        apply such measures…

    To a person with common sense the phrase not involving the use of armed force means not
 involving the use of armed force; so why do British Government lawyers repeatedly claim that the
      UN Security Council has authorised the use of armed force when it is clearly forbidden?

                                UN General Assembly Resolution 2625

   In 1970 the United Nations agreed 51 new definitions of the law governing in UNGA Resolution


This Declaration is one of the most important legal documents the world has ever produced; yet few
   if any public office holders in Britain or America have seen it or read it. It includes these rules:

   Every State has the duty to refrain in its international relations from the threat or use of force
    against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or in any other manner
  inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations. Such a threat or use of force constitutes a
violation of international law and the Charter of the United Nations and shall never be employed as
                                 a means of settling international issues.

No State or group of States has the right to intervene, directly or indirectly, for any reason whatever,
in the internal or external affairs of any other State. Consequently, armed intervention and all other
    forms of interference or attempted threats against the personality of the State or against its
            political, economic and cultural elements are in violation of international law.

  The principles of the Charter which are embodied in this Declaration constitute basic principles of
international law, and consequently [the UN General Assembly] appeals to all States to be guided by
 these principles in their international conduct and to develop their mutual relations on the basis of
                                the strict observance of these principles.

 These laws are crystal clear. The use of force is prohibited. The use of armed force to attack other
   nations is a crime. No state or group of States such as NATO, ISAF or the EU, may intervene in
        another State’s affairs and every State must obey, uphold and enforce these rules.

  The crimes associated with waging aggressive war, laid down in the Nuremburg Principles and the
   Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, are also clear. If any person, in furtherance of a
state policy, orders the use of force to attack members of a national, ethnic, racial or religious group,
  that person and everyone who takes part in the attack is responsible for the consequences, breaks
 international law and, if it results in the deaths of innocent people, commits the universal crimes of
    genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, aggression or conduct ancillary to such crimes.

  So why do British and NATO politicians, lawyers and civil servants interpret phrases such as all
necessary measures, humanitarian intervention, and not involving the use of armed force to mean
using weapons of mass destruction such as cruise missiles, rockets, drones, bombs and radioactive
 munitions to invade and occupy Afghanistan and Iraq or to attack Libya? Could the real reason for
these heinous decisions to kill innocent civilians and destroy weaker nations be a psychopathic lack
   of conscience and moral values, or is it perhaps because they know that they control the law
enforcement processes and can ensure that they will never be arrested, prosecuted or convicted for
  their war crimes, for the suffering inflicted on their victims or the horrific consequences of their

  For more than sixty years UK Government Ministers, officers and lawyers have deceived everyone
 over the illegality of war and armed conflict and have got away with it. These massacres of Afghan,
 Iraqi and Libyan civilians in which at least 450,000 children have died and more than 1m have been
injured and maimed since 2001 are the worst atrocities in British history. Why is it then that not one
 member of the UK establishment is willing to call a halt to the killing or speak out against it? Why is
    it that those with the power to stop the wars and enforce the laws repeatedly refuse to do so?

It is time for law abiding citizens everywhere to take a stand against Britain’s political, civil, judicial
and military leaders and institutions to ensure that the killing is stopped, the resort to war is ended
and those responsible for the deaths of 1.5m civilians are arrested and prosecuted for their crimes.

                            Chris Coverdale The Peace Strike August 2012

“First they came for the Communists,                            Then they came for the Catholics,
and I didn't speak up,                                                     and I didn't speak up,
because I wasn't a Communist.                                         because I was a Protestant.

hen they came for the Jews,                                               Then they came for me,
and I didn't speak up,                                          and by that time there was no one
because I wasn't a Jew.                                                  left to speak up for me. “

                   by Rev.Martin Niemoller, 1892-1984, written in 1945

Description: One of many letters to the Hague with evidence of Britain's disturbing austerity deaths.