Docstoc

here Texas Association of Partners in Education

Document Sample
here Texas Association of Partners in Education Powered By Docstoc
					Texas Association of Partners in Education Awards Scoring Criteria


SCORING CRITERIA FOR COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP AWARDS, BUSINESS
PARTNERSHIP AWARDS, AND PROGRAM PARTNERSHIP AWARDS

Program Description                                                  Potential Points (20)
Clearly explain why the partnership was established                  5
Vision and mission of partnership                                    5
Details of service and a rich description of activities              5
Evidence of diverse partnership stakeholders                         5

Program Impact                                                       Potential Points (35)
Progress/Impact on students                                          15
Progress/Impact on school                                            10
Replicability                                                        10

Quantitative Results                                       Potential Points (35)
How is the education partnership/program evaluated? 20
How does this partnership support a campus/district        15
improvement goal?
Provide evaluative data (before and after statistics, etc.) showing that the
partnership or program improved the students’ academic work, attendance,
physical, or mental health.

Endorsements                                                         Potential Points (10)
Letters of support, testimonials, photographs, media                 10
releases, clippings, etc. may be included. (up to 3
8”X11” page attachments per application)

SCORING CRITERIA FOR INDIVIDUAL PARTNER AWARDS

Description of Services                                    Potential Points (20)
Describe the role/duties of this individual and illustrate 10
their commitment to the organization.
What community need does this individual’s service         10
meet?

Impact                                                               Potential Points (35)
Describe the impact that this individual has had on                  35
the organization and/or student achievement through
their involvement.

Quantitative Results (scope of the individual’s                      Potential Points (35)
work/service)
How many hours did this individual support your                      5
organization? Was it daily, weekly, monthly?
How many students did the nominee interact with?                     5
Texas Association of Partners in Education Awards Scoring Criteria


How many campuses did the nominee support?                 5
How does this individual’s involvement support a           20
campus/district improvement goal?
Provide evaluative data (before and after statistics, etc.) showing that the
partnership or program improved the students’ academic work, attendance,
physical or mental health.

Endorsements                                                         Potential Points (10)
Letters of support, testimonials, photographs, media                 10
releases, clippings, etc. may be included. (up to 3
8”X11” page attachments per application)

SCORING CRITERIA FOR SPECIAL EVENTS

Research and Planning                                                Potential Points (20)
Describe what kind of research or assessment was                     5
used to determine what kind of special event was
necessary.
Describe how this event fulfilled a district or                      5
department goal.
Identify target audience(s) for this event.                          5
Describe the planning that went into this special                    5
event, addressing any challenges of time, budget or
personnel.

Implementation                                                       Potential Points (35)
Describe how the event was organized, if any                         20
partners were involved, timeline for the event, and
techniques used to promote the event.
Describe how promotion of the event and the event                    15
itself were designed to highlight partnerships, such as
type of invitation used, types of awards presented,
student performances, program speakers, etc.

Quantitative Results and Evaluation                                  Potential Points (35)
Use data to describe how the special event met the                   15
goal(s) and achieved intended results.
Describe how this special event was evaluated so                     10
that so that improvements can be made for any future
events.
Describe how this special event can be replicated on                 10
other campuses or with other districts.

Endorsements                                                         Potential Points (10)
Letters of support, testimonials, photographs, media                 10
releases, clippings, etc. may be included. (up to 3
Texas Association of Partners in Education Awards Scoring Criteria


8”X11” page attachments per application)

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:4
posted:10/8/2012
language:English
pages:3