Input-Output Models for Impact Analysis Suggestions for

Document Sample
Input-Output Models for Impact Analysis Suggestions for Powered By Docstoc
					          Input-Output Models for
              Impact Analysis:
          Suggestions for Practitioners Using RIMS II

                           Rebecca Bess
                   65th Annual AUBER Fall Conference
                             Indianapolis, IN
                            October 8-11, 2011
              Outline of Today’s Talk

     ▪   Input-output models
     ▪   Key assumptions
     ▪   Information required from users
     ▪   Multiplier selection
     ▪   Common mistakes                                2
                         I-O Multipliers

     ▪ Similarities to macroeconomic multipliers
           Initial change leads to additional spending
           Leakages (imports, saving, taxes)

     ▪ Differences from macroeconomic multipliers
           Measured inter-industry relationships
           No supply constraints

     ▪ Similar results between models more likely when
       resources are “slack”

     ▪ Advantages of industry-level detail                                               3
                     Literature Review

     ▪ Macroeconomic multipliers
           Kahn (1931); Hall (2005)

     ▪ I-O multipliers
           Leontief (1938); Isard (1951); Richardson (1985);
            Beemiller (1990)

     ▪ Uses and misuses of multipliers
           Coughlin and Mandelbaum (1991); Mills (1993);
            Hughes (2003); Grady and Mullen (1988); Harris
            (1997); Siegfried, Sanderson, and McHenry (2006)                                                     4
                           National Use Table

   •   Intermediate inputs are commodities purchased by industries
   •   Value added is the income earned in production, including labor earnings
   •   Total gross output = Intermediate Inputs + Value Added
   •   GDP = Σ Value added = Σ Final use; GDP ≠ Total gross output                                                                       5
                  Key Assumptions

     ▪   Backward linkages
     ▪   Fixed production patterns
     ▪   Industry homogeneity
     ▪   Fixed prices and no supply constraints
     ▪   Local supply conditions
     ▪   No regional feedback effects                                       6
        Information Required from Users

     ▪ Final-demand change
           Expressed in terms of output, earnings, or employment
           Changes in demand from final users
               Personal consumption expenditures (C) ; Investment in new
                construction, equipment, software (I); Government (G); Exports (X)
     ▪ Final-demand industry
           Detailed or aggregate
           Consider project phases
     ▪ Final-demand region
           Purpose of the study
           Area of interrelated economic activity
               Location of industries supplying direct inputs
               Where most new employees will reside                                                                          7
              Multiplier Selection                          8
                 Common Mistakes

     ▪ Not taking offsets into consideration
     ▪ Confusing gross output with regional GDP
     ▪ Confusing changes in investment with
       intermediate purchases
     ▪ Using final-demand changes in purchaser prices
     ▪ Using a Type II multiplier when a Type I
       multipliers is more appropriate
     ▪ Averaging or summing multipliers
     ▪ Using multipliers to measure industry
       contributions                                             9
                   Further Suggestions

     ▪ Avoid using multipliers to estimate the
       impacts of:
           single events taking place over a short period of
           an industry’s contribution to the economy,
            especially one of the economy’s largest industries
           changes large enough to affect the structure of the
            economy                                                       10
                   Thank You

                   Rebecca Bess
     RIMS II Section, Regional Product Division
        U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis

               Phone: 202-606-5343
              E-mail:                                       11

Shared By: