March 2009 Project Management Trends for 2009
Shared by: HC12100511645
-
Stats
- views:
- 0
- posted:
- 10/5/2012
- language:
- English
- pages:
- 2
Document Sample


Project Management Trends for 2009 – March, 2009
Summarized by Pamela Hollington & Andrew McClure
Introduction that does not necessarily mean there is a
virtual team
This month we had a group discussion based on
an article of the Top 10 Project Management Time zones can make it extremely
Trends for 2009. challenging to manage communications and
to manage your own “work-life balance” – if
The trends identified were: you are needing to get in early to meet with
one group of the team in one time zone, and
1. The Sandwich Generation: Middle then at the same time, stay late to be
Managers’ Emerging Role in Change available for another group, your hours as a
2. Navigating Virtual Teams through Change PM or team member can become
3. Sharper Distinctions Between Project and unreasonable
Program Management Nothing beats face-to-face meetings – it is
4. Leveraging Communities of Practice To good on any project to be able to have at
Hone Skills least one face-to-face meeting early on to set
5. Strategic Selling of the Project Management the stage and allow everyone to meet each
Office other
6. Back to Basics for Successful Project
Portfolio Management Leveraging Communities
7. Right-sizing Staff with Demand Driven PMI-WC / PMI ISSIG is all about
Resource Management community
8. Improved Requirements Metrics It is felt that the PMP is becoming the
9. People Will Come Before Technology minimal standard for a PM job – especially
10. Risk Management for Governance in a government contracts
However, having said that, the PMP is not a
The article was written by Leroy Ward, of ESI guaranty of a job
International and he is a respected author and
speaker in the field of project management.
PMO – Strategic Selling
In our breakout groups, each group discussed a Recognition that more project management
few of 10 trends presented in the article, and is needed
identified our own challenges and suggestions Agree with strategic need for PMO for all
for making the “road ahead” smoother for all of projects
us! IS and Construction projects use different
tools and report differently but use same
Here are some notes from some of the processes
discussions. See the need for IT and the rest of the
organization to use consistent processes
Managing Virtual Teams through Managers hide operational budget “projects”
Change as opposed to capitalizing projects
More and more, teams are not co-located PMO will provide a consistent approach
and this presents challenges in motivating,
managing, and controlling team work
Virtual “teams” versus distributed Right-Sizing Staff
implementations should not be confused – Though “right-sizing” is a nice, politically-
the project team (virtual or co-located) is the correct term, too often it is just a
group responsible for seeing the project gets replacement for economic-based layoffs
completed; they may need to implement Too often, too, decrease in resources does
their result across multiple locations, but NOT result in decrease of workload relative
to that right-sizing and those remaining are knowledge and tools to pick the right projects,
left to do “more with less” (and since most ensure support for change and effectively track
organizations were already stretched, the progress for smart governance will be key to
burden can become not only unbearable, but project success – saving time and money while
impractical) driving organizational success.”
Still unclear about how many organizations
are really resource-loading their project
plans in order to appropriately be able to do Thanks and Sponsorship
this anyway – do they know who is working Recognition
on what, how much is expected of them, and
how available a resource really is? Thanks to Andrew for assisting in creating this
summary by providing his notes from the
session.
People before Technology
Organizations identifying that different Thanks also to our sponsors of the local ISSIG
systems need to “talk” to each other, meetings: Teksystems and Software
Need to define business processes before Productivity Centre, our founding sponsors; as
implementing a new product well as Eagle Professional Resources, BC
Example SAP implementation success Hydro, PCGI Consulting, and Rebound
(based on a study the group had heard about) Consulting. The generous support of our
– rated as 2/10 as a product install and 8/10 sponsors allows us to pay for the meeting room,
with BPR included in the project. and to provide the coffee, juice and donuts for
our meetings.
Summary Upcoming Meetings
The article concluded as follows:
Contact Info: For more info on the ISSIG or any
“While these trends are about doing more with of the topics in this summary, please contact
less, they all speak to the concept of less is more. Pamela Hollington, at (604) 988-4102 or by
In 2009, more than at any time in recent history, email at pamela@reboundltd.com.
empowering people with the right skills,
Get documents about "