Computer Vision - UvA Startpagina - Universiteit van Amsterdam
Document Sample


INCAPS
An Intelligent Camera-Projection System
Framework
Roberto Valenti
Jurjen Pieters
Overview
• The State of The Art
• What are we going to do
• The Framework
• First Year(s) Project Plan
• Examples
• References
• Equipment Costs Estimation
State of The Art
State of The Art
State of The Art
State of The Art
The Situation
Hardware
Hardware Hardware
Company
Hardware
Company Company
Algorithms
Company
Algorithms
Algorithms
Algorithms
Databases Databases
Databases Software
Databases Software
Software
Software
What are we going to do?
• The scene needs a framework
– Easier way to implement application
– Interoperability
– New possibilities (more on this later)
The framework will extract information
from “the world”, and will give the
opportunity to select what is relevant
The Framework
Users or
Companies
Input Devices
(Camera)
Input Analysis
DB
Internal world
INCAPS representation
Picture Processing Modules
Output Devices
(Projector)
The world as a source..
• We have to represent the world
internally to understand it better
• Single components are not enough
• All the input devices are used to sample
the world on different aspects (a lot of
information out there!)
• REALTIME!
The Project Planning
• First year: Research and tests of
algorithms on multiple input devices,
setup and tuning.
• Second year: Have an efficient internal
world representation.
• Third year: Addition of multiple
input/output devices, creation of API’s
Reality 2 Digital
Reality 2 Digital
3D Information Extraction
• We have an internal world-map, we can
specify rules (I.e. pedestrians)
• Companies/Users can decide what is
important (tumors, broken bones, road, traffic
signs,components)
• Possibility to apply further algorithms to
subsets of world-data
• Depending on the application, we can
recognize and label objects, matching them
with databases and ad-hoc algorithms
Digital 2 Reality
• The extracted information
is displayed to the user in
the most useful way,
depending on the
application.
Digital 2 Reality: Examples
Night Vision
Pedestrian detection
Equipment Costs Estimation
A very powerful computer, a car and ..
• Input Devices: • Output Devices :
– Stereo Camera – One or two out of:
– Radars • Projector
• VR glasses
– IR Night-viewer
• Translucent screen
– Database System
• HUD
– Wireless
Communication
– GPS
Total: ~30.000 €
References
[1] Y. Baillot, D. Brown, and S. Julier. Authoring of Physical Models Using [14] D.M. Krum, R. Melby, W. Ribarsky, and L.F. Hodges.IsometricPointer
Mobile Computers. Fifth International Symposium on Wearable Interfaces for Wearable 3D Visualization. Submission to ACM CHI
Computers, pages 39–46, October 7-10,2001. Conference on Human Factors in Computing System, April 5-10, 2003.
[2] J.F. Bartlett. Rock ’n’ Scroll is Here to Stay. IEEE Computer Graphics and [15] D.M. Krum, O. Omoteso, W. Ribarsky, T. Starner, and L.F.Hodges. Speech
Applications, 20(3):40–45, May/June 2000. and Gesture Control of a Whole Earth 3D Visualization Environment. Joint
[3] U.S. Census Bureau. Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Eurographics - IEEE TCVG Symposium on Visualization, May 27-29, 2002.
Referencing System, http://www.census.gov/geo/www/tiger. 2002. [16] D.M. Krum, O. Omoteso, W. Ribarsky, T. Starner, and L.F.Hodges. Evaluation
[4] A. Cheyer, L. Julia, and J. Martin. A Unified Framework for Constructing of a Multimodal Interface for 3D Terrain Visualization. IEEE Visualization,
Multimodal Applications. Conference on Cooperative Multimodal October 27-November 1, 2002.
Communication (CMC98), pages 63–69,January 1998. [17] D.M. Krum, W. Ribarsky, C.D. Shaw, L.F. Hodges, andN. Faust. Situational
[5] W.J. Clinton. Statement by the President Regarding the United States’ Visualization. ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology,
Decision to Stop Degrading Global Positioning System Accuracy. Office pages 143–150, November 15-17, 2001.
the the Press Secretary, The White House, May 1, 2000. [18] K. Lyons and T. Starner. Mobile Capture for Wearable Computer Usability
[6] P.R. Cohen, M. Johnston, D. McGee, S. Oviatt, J. Pittman,I. Smith, L. Chen, Testing. Fifth International Symposium on Wearable Computers.
and J. Clow. Quickset: Multimodal Interaction for Distributed Applications. [19] J. Murray.Wearable Computers in Battle: Recent Advances in the LandWarrior
ACM International Multimedia Conference, pages 31–40, 1997. System. Fourth International Symposium on Wearable Computers, pages
[7] R.T. Collins, A.R. Hanson, and E.M. Riseman. Site Model Acquisition under 169–170, October 18-21, 2000.
the UMass RADIUS Project. Proceedings of the ARPA Image [20] S.L. Oviatt. Mutual Disambiguation of Recognition Errors in a Multimodal
Understanding Workshop, pages 351–358,1994. Architecture. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in
[8] D. Davis, T.Y. Jiang, W. Ribarsky, and N. Faust. Intent, Perception, and Out- Computing Systems (CHI’99), pages 576–583, May 15-20, 1999.
of-Core Visualization Applied to Terrain. IEEE Visualization, pages 455– [21] W. Piekarski and B.H. Thomas. Tinmith-Metro: New Outdoor Techniques for
458, October 1998. Creating City Models with an Augmented Reality Wearable Computer. Fifth
[9] D. Davis, W. Ribarsky, T.Y. Jiang, N. Faust, and Sean Ho. Real-Time International Symposium on Wearable Computers, pages 31–38, October 7-
Visualization of Scalably Large Collections of Heterogeneous Objects. 10,2001.
IEEE Visualization, pages 437–440,October 1999. [22] J. Rekimoto. Tilting Operations for Small Screen Interfaces. ACM User
[10] N. Faust, W. Ribarsky, T.Y. Jiang, and T. Wasilewski. Real-Time Global Interface Software and Technology, pages 167–168, November 6-8, 1996.
Data Model for the Digital Earth. IEEE Visualization,March 2000. [23] J.C. Spohrer. Information in Places. IBM Systems Journal, 38(4):602–628,
[11] T.L. Haithcoat, W. Song, and J.D. Hipple. Building Footprint Extraction and 1999.
3-D Reconstruction from LIDAR.Data Remote Sensing and Data Fusion [24] J. Vandekerckhove, D. Frere, T. Moons, and L. Van Gool.Semi-Automatic
over Urban Areas,IEEE/ISPRS Joint Workshop, pages 74–78, 2001. Modelling of Urban Buildings from High Resolution Aerial Imagery.
[12] K. Hinckley, J.S. Pierce, M. Sinclair, and E. Horvitz. Sensing Techniques Computer Graphics International Proceedings, pages 588–596, 1998.
for Mobile Interaction. ACM User Interface Software and Technology, [25] T. Wasilewski, N. Faust, and W. Ribarsky. Semi-Automated and Interactive
pages 91–100, November 5-8, 2000. Construction of 3D Urban Terrains. Proceedings of the SPIE Aerospace,
[13] J.M. Kahn, R.H. Katz, and K.S.J. Pister. Mobile Networking for Smart Dust. Defense Sensing, Simulation and Controls Symposium, 3694A, 1999.
ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and [26] S. You, U. Neumann, and R. Azuma. Orientation Tracking for Outdoor
Networking (MobiCom 99), pages 116–122, August 17-19, 1999. Augmented Reality Registration. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications,
19(6):36–42, Nov/Dec 1999.
Questions
?
Get documents about "