RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03582-2
INDEX CODE: 110.02
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22, Report of Separation and
Record of Service, be changed by removing the comment Medically
Disqualified, his Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code be
changed, and his Reenlistment Eligibility be changed to Eligible
rather than Ineligible.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
On 11 July 2006, the applicant's request to change his records
was considered and denied by the Board. For an accounting of the
facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s request, and,
the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the
Record of Proceedings at Exhibit E.
On 14 March 2007, he submitted a request for reconsideration
contending his assertions he has been symptom and medicine free
for over four and one-half years will have to be accepted “AS IS”
(emphasis applicant) from both himself and his doctor. He does
not know how otherwise to prove he is not taking any medication.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
After again reviewing this application and the evidence provided
in support of his appeal, we remain unpersuaded the applicant’s
NGB Form 22 should be changed to reflect those entries he has
identified as being in error. We carefully considered the
statements provided by the applicant and while we believe the
evidence to be new and relevant, we feel it is not of such
significance as to alter our original decision. Therefore, in
the absence of evidence to the contrary, the Board finds no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice; and that the application will only be reconsidered
upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 19 April 2007, under the provisions of AFI
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Ms. Mary C. Puckett, Member
Ms. Josephine L. Davis, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit E. Record of Proceedings, dated 20 Jul 2006,
with exhibits A through D.
Exhibit F. Applicant’s Letter, Undated.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ