Edwards Aquifer first prototype - PowerPoint - PowerPoint
Document Sample


Rapid Prototyping Workshop
Seven threatened and
endangered species of the
Edwards Aquifer
Federally Listed Species
Seven endangered species :
• Texas Blind Salamander
• Fountain Darter
• San Marcos Gambusia
• Texas Wild-rice
• Comal Springs Riffle Beetle
• Comal Springs Dryopid Beetle
• Peck's Cave Amphipod
One threatened species:
• San Marcos Salamander
Species to Address
Texas wild-rice (TWR)
(Zizania texana)
Problem Statement
(in short)
• Develop an iterative process that will be
used to determine jeopardy for the Texas
wild rice (Zizania texana) in light of
scientific uncertainty and political
controversy surrounding water
management of the Edwards Aquifer
• Jeopardy defined by change in probability
in area of occupancy < threshold
Process
• Identify influencing factors
– Broad, inclusive list
– Narrowed to most influential
• Model the relationship between factors
– Focus on upper reach
• Developed simple belief model
– Possible states & conditional probability tables
• Explored alternatives with the model
– Baseline
– Alternatives
The Model
Spring Flow (depth & velocity)
< 50 0 Texas Wild-Rice
50 - 100 0 Prototype 1
100 - 180 100 Baseline
> 180 0
Invasive Plant Cover
High 0 Floating Veg Amount Recreation Use Flood Damage
Med 100 High 0 High 0 High 20.0
Low 0 Med 0 Med 100 Med 50.0
Low 100 Low 0 Low 30.0
Potential Habitat (m-sq)
"none" 40.0 % of Poten Habitat Occupied
<1000 30.0 <25 38.0
1000-3500 20.0 25-50 17.0
3500-7500 10.0 50-75 16.0
75-100 29.0
Area Occupancy 20 yr (m-sq)
"gone" 51.7
<1000 30.3
1000-3500 13.7
3500-7500 4.30
Factors Baseline Alt. 1 Alt. 2
<50
50-100 100
Springflow
100-180 100 100
>180
High
Invasive
Plants Medium 100
(% Cover)
Low 100 100
High
Floating Veg. Medium 100
Low 100 100
High
Flood Damage Medium 100
Low 100 100
High
Recreation Medium 100
Low 100 100
Alternative 2
Texas Wildrice
Spring Flow (depth & velocity)
Prototype 1
< 50 0 Alternative 2
50 - 100 0
100 - 180 100
> 180 0
Invasive Plant Cover
High 0 Floating Veg Amount Recreation Use Flood Damage
Med 0 High 100 High 100 High 100
Low 100 Med 0 Med 0 Med 0
Low 0 Low 0 Low 0
Potential Habitat (m-sq)
"none" 0 % of Poten Habitat Occupied
<1000 40.0 <25 90.0
1000-3500 40.0 25-50 10.0
3500-7500 20.0 50-75 0
75-100 0
Area Occupancy 20 yr (m-sq)
"gone" 35.8
<1000 46.4
1000-3500 17.0
3500-7500 0.80
OUTCOMES
(Area of TWR in m2)
Baseline Gone 51.7
Flow 100-180 <1000 30.3
Invasive – med.
Floating - low 1000-3500 13.7
Flood - low
Recreation - low >3500 4.3
Alt. 1 Gone 50.6
Flow 50 -100
<1000 20.9
Invasive – low
Floating - low 1000-3500 15.2
Flood - low
Recreation - low >3500 13.4
Alt. 2 Gone 35.8
Flow 100-180 <1000 46.4
Invasive – low
Floating - med 1000-3500 17
Flood - med
Recreation - med >3500 8
Next Steps
• Break out into groups
• Repeat rapid prototyping for the Fountain
Darter and Comal Springs Dryopid Beetle
• Continue work with refining alternatives
and work on the simulation model
• How this will input into the RIP
Get documents about "