Battle Dress Uniform Year 3 – Technical Report Total
Document Sample


Battle Dress Uniform
Year 3 – Technical Report
Total Cost Addendum
Date: June 2, 2000
Apparel Technology and Research Center
California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Prepared By:
ATRC Staff
2.0 Grand Total Costs
2.1 Total Cost Summary
Table 2.1-1: Battle Dress Uniform Total Contract Cost Per Unit Summary
PANTS
Actual Cost Percent of Standard Percent of
Total Cost Total
A. Labor Cost $3.17 28.48% $2.50 26.43%
B. Material Cost $7.96 71.52% $6.96 73.57%
C. Grand Total Cost $11.13 100.00 % $ 9.46 100.00 %
Table 2.1-1: Battle Dress Uniform Total Contract Cost Per Unit Summary
COATS
Actual Cost Percent of Standard Percent of
Total Cost Total
A. Labor Cost $7.67 44.03% $5.17 34.93%
B. Material Cost $9.75 55.97% $9.63 65.07%
C. Grand Total Cost $17.42 100.00 % $14.80 100.00 %
2.2 Total Labor and Materials Cost Breakdown
Table 2.2-1: Battle Dress Uniform -Total Labor Cost Per Unit
Breakdown
PANTS
Actual Std. % % of
Cost Cost Effcnt Total
Pre-production Labor Cost $0.14 $0.14 a 100.00 4.41%
%
Production Labor Cost $2.67 $2.00 74.91% 84.23 %
Post-production Labor Cost $0.36 $0.36c 100.00 11.36%
%
Total Labor Cost per Unit $3.17 $2.50 78.86% 100.00 %
Table 2.2-1: Battle Dress Uniform -Total Labor Cost Per Unit
Breakdown
COATS
Actual Std. % % of
Cost Cost Effcnt Total
Pre-production Labor Cost $0.19 $.19a 100.00 2.48 %
%
Production Labor Cost $7.12 $4.62b 64.88% 92.83%
Post-production Labor Cost $0.36 $0.36c 100.00 4.69%
%
Total Labor Cost per Unit $7.67 $ 5.17 67.41% 100.00
%
a Cal Poly ATRC’s Indirect Labor Activity Cost Study for a Sample Military Apparel Contract dated
9/96.
b Cal Poly ATRC’s Battle Dress Uniform Final Technical Report dated 9/7/99.
c The actual time was used as the standard.
Table 2.2-2: Battle Dress Uniform Total Materials Cost Per Unit
Breakdown
BDU PANTS
Number Item Cost Actual Percent Std.Qty. Std. Percent
per Qty. of Total Required Cost of Total
Unit Used per
Unit
1 Self (Basic $6.98 1.44a 87.69% 1.24 ydsb $6.01 86.35%
Material)
2 Rib $0.53 .19 6.65% .19 yd.c $0.53 7.62%
yd.
3 Thread $0.23 203 2.89% 200 ydsd $0.23 3.31%
yds
4 Buttons $0.03 2 0.38 % 2 eache $0.03 0.43 %
each
5 ID/ $0.02 1 0.25 % 1 eache $0.02 0.29%
Instruction each
Label
6 Size Label $0.01 1 0.13% 1 eache $0.01 0.14 %
each
7 Bar Code $0.01 1 0.13% 1 eache $0.01 0.14%
Label each
8 Elastic $0.14 36 1.75% 29.5 $0.11 1.58%
inches inchesf
9 Gimp $0.01 4 0.13% 4 inchese $0.01 0.14%
inches
Total $7.96 100.00 $6.96 100.0%
%
a Actual quantity was based on usage of first quality fabric (no defects).
b The standard used was obtained from the DSCP’s BDU contract – Allowance per unit.
c The standard was obtained by using ATRC’s actual history on rib cuts.
d The standard used was obtained from Coats American’s Thread Consumption Guide for jackets.
e The quantity used represents the actual required quantity for the garment. The ATRC did not
track actual material usage for labels, buttons and thread.
f The standard represents the allowance for the average of 9 sizes per the DSCP’s BDU contract.
Table 2.2-2: Battle Dress Uniform Total Materials Cost Per Unit
Breakdown
BDU COAT
Number Item Cost Actual Percent Std.Qty. Std. Percent of
per Qty. of Total Required Cost Total
Unit Used per
Unit
1 Self (Basic $8.89 1.83a 91.17% 1.81 ydsb $8.79 91.27%
Material) yds
2 Gimp $0.004 36 0.04% 30 $0.003 0.03%
Thread inches inchesc
3 Thread $0.60 522 6.15% 500 ydsd $0.57 5.92%
yds
4 Buttons $0.22 15 2.25% 15 eache $0.22 2.28 %
each
5 ID/ $0.02 1 0.19% 1 eache $0.02 0.20%
Instruction each
Label
6 Size Label $0.01 1 0.10% 1 eache $0.02 0.20%
each
7 Bar Code $0.01 1 0.10% 1 eache $0.01 0.10%
Label each
$9.75 $100.00 $9.63 100.00%
Total %
a Actual quantity was based on usage of first quality fabric (no defects).
b The standard used was obtained from the DSCP’s BDU contract – Allowance per unit.
c ATRC’s standard thread usage – 2 inches per buttonhole.
d The standard used was obtained from Coats American’s Thread Consumption Guide for jackets.
e The quantity used represents the actual required quantity for the garment. The ATRC did not
track actual material usage for labels, buttons and thread.
Related docs
Get documents about "