Docstoc

Los Angeles Nuclear Destruction Prophecies

Document Sample
Los Angeles Nuclear Destruction Prophecies Powered By Docstoc
					Los Angeles Nuclear Destruction Prophecies




22
  But I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon
at the day of judgment, than for you. And thou, Capernaum,
                                      23


which art exalted unto heaven, shalt be brought down to hell: for
if the mighty works, which have been done in thee, had been
done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day. But I say
                                                        24


unto you, That it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom in
the day of judgment, than for thee. Holy Bible, Matthew 11:22-24
Words of Prophetic Judgment Against Los Angeles
California
Given through Brian Charles

“I’M gonna destroy that place with such mighty force that you won’t believe it!”
--LosAngeles
“I must destroy this place. It’s sin has risen before Me. It will be sudden. Flee!” --Los
Angeles
“This place will be destroyed suddenly. Millions will die.” --Los Angeles
“You MUST go! Flee the city of My wrath!” --Los Angeles
“You like it because it is nice and sunny. Millions will die. It will all be submerged
underwater.” --Los Angeles
“I’ll destroy this place suddenly with My mighty hand. They won’t obey Me.” --L.A.
andthe Los Angeles International Airport
“The city must be destroyed. It won’t obey Me, none of ‘em will. See this place willbe
destroyed suddenly.” --Los Angeles
“I’m gonna destroy this place suddenly. Few will survive. Millions will die. Repent!”“I
must judge this place. Its sin has come up before Me.” “This city will be destroyed in a
second. Great is My wrath against this place. It’s people must repent orelse!” --Los
Angeles
“I must destroy this place. Its sin has risen before Me.” --Los Angeles
“All these buildings will be reduced to rubble.” “Few will survive My wrath!” --downtown
Los Angeles
“This will all be destroyed in a second. Great is My wrath against this place.” Los
Angeles and the Los Angeles International Airport
“Someday it’ll be gone. It’ll all be destroyed. It’ll be destroyed by force someday.They’ll
be desolate (the highways). I’M gonna destroy it suddenly. Few will survive.It’s sin has
come before Me. I must destroy this place. It’ll all be flattened bynuclear explosion. It’ll
all be wiped away. You’ll see—a mighty nuclear explosion.The bombs are already in
place. It all must go down.” --Los Angeles
“I’M gonna bring it all down.” --highway overpasses, buildings
“All this land will break off into the ocean.” --California
“California will be a thing of the past, swept into the sea.”
“Submerged under the sea.” --Cajon Summit Mountains
“I’M gonna destroy this place with a sudden blast!” --Claremont
“Someday this will be a thing of the past, destroyed by My mighty hand.” --Los Angeles
International Airport
“It’ll all be submerged underwater. It all must go. Its sin has risen before Me. Yes, I
MUST destroy this place. You MUST get out of here! --Los Angeles
“That’s what’s gonna be. Nothing will be left remaining.” “People are too selfish to serve
Me here. All they want is the world. I must judge them for that-by nuclearfire!” --The Los
Angeles megacity totally destroyed
“I MUST destroy this place. It’s sin has risen before Me. “It’ll be crumbled beneath your
feet. You’ll see—a great nuclear disaster. See what they do? You must go.” “Greatis My
wrath against this place.” --UCLA
“All this will be submerged underwater.” “Come down in a minute!” --UCLA, L.A.
“All this will be submerged underwater.” UCLA, Bel Air, Brentwood, Westwood Village,
Los Angeles
“It will all come down in an instant.” --Westwood Gateway Towers
“People are too selfish to serve Me here. All they want is the world. I must judge them
for that-by nuclear fire!” “Nobody wants to obey Me.” “They won’t listen. They’llbe all
gone.” --the people of Los Angeles
“I have waited for many to repent, for no avail.”
“Many will die, judgment will be great.”
“Someday this will all be underwater.” --Los Angeles
“They won’t serve Me. They serve themselves.” --the Jewish People
“Great will be the death in the world, starting with My Church.” “Few will serve Me My
way.”
“They’ve all followed their own way and won’t obey. I must judge for that. Amen”
“My people shall be destroyed, for the sin of their mouths—they talk much but do
nothing. They MUST be destroyed. Amen.” “I will destroy them all.” --God’s people,
theChurch and the Jewish people
“I’ll judge for that!” --people talking about problems but doing nothing
“I will judge for that.” “I expect ‘em to help.” --God’s people saying ‘I can’t help
you,’when they’ve been prospering materially and financially
“Destroy My people with your prophetic word!” “Destroy My people. They won’t do My
will.” “I’M gonna judge My Church because they won’t obey Me.” “I’M gonna judge My
people!” “You’ll see—eternal destruction! They won’t obey!” “Destroy My people. They
won’t do anything about it (Planned Parenthood). They MUST be destroyed! That’s how
it will happensuddenly.Few will survive.” “You must tell. You must send.” “This land will
be destroyed suddenly.” “Great will be her destruction. Flee for your life, flee! You must
go!” --Los Angeles & California
“I will annihilate this race. Few will survive. Amen” --The American People
“America will be destroyed by nuclear bombs, because My Church has forsaken Me!”
“I must destroy this empire. You’ll see it before your very eyes. Its sin has come before
Me.” “That’s why I’M going to destroy the country—the people love lust.” --The USA
“This country will become an empty wasteland, full of cactus and tumbleweeds.” “All
this will be empty and waste, because My people don’t do My will.” --The United States
of America
“I’ll judge for both.” “I’ll judge for both—a mighty nuclear blast!” --America being
founded
for the propagation of the Gospel—the work left undone, and to grow and ship tobacco
back to England
“You must go.” “Few will survive.” “You’ll see—a great nuclear disaster! It must happen.
Its sin has come before Me—those high mountains will be submerged under the sea.”
“Allthis place will be sunken.” “It all must go under the sea.” “You must get out of here!
It’ll be all gone!” “You must go!” --Los Angeles and California
“Even in disaster I’ll be with you.”
“I will create a new Church.”
“I’ll have mercy on this place because you asked. The judgment will not come
immediately.”
“The judgment will not come immediately. I’m giving time to repent.”
“I can blast it away. That’s what I’ll do.” --The Ritz Carlton, downtown Los Angeles
“I will judge for that!” --pastors who sacrifice Truth for numbers and money and
popularity
“Those days will return.” --the days of having to ride horses to get out West
“The Western deserts will flow with blood!”
“I’ll judge for that!” --women not wanting to depend on a man for their livelihood
“I will judge for that.” --people always looking for a better deal in life
“I’ll judge for that.” --the racial segregation of the Church
“I’ll judge for that.” --the bias in science against God and Truth in areas of research and
study
“It’s all gonna go belly-up.” --the economy
“My Church has deserted Me. I must destroy them for that. By nuclear war. Thus
says the Lord of Hosts. Amen”

“And you, Capernaum, which are exalted unto heaven, shalt be brought
down to hell:
for if the mighty works, which have been done in you, had been done in
Sodom, it would have remained until this day.” Matthew 11:23

“Trust ye in the LORD forever: for in the LORD JEHOVAH is everlasting
strength: For
He brings down them that dwell on high; the lofty city, He lays it low; He lays
it low, even to the ground; He brings it even to the dust. The foot shall tread
it down, even the feet of the poor, and the steps of the needy.” Isaiah 26:4-6




Prophecy Against Los Angeles
As I drive, I see pictures of L.A., raised to the ground. I ask the Lord about the stands of
trees. Will they not be left standing.? An occasional trunk may stand but without leaf. I see a
devastated wasteland! an empty desert! I listen for the voices of the birds. Even the crows
are silent ! Where the city stood and extended, nothing!
Cause 1: Global Exportation of a Malevolent Culture
God is against you, Los Angeles, city of pornography, city of oppression, home of rape and
exploitation. You have beamed evil and malevolence, violence and bloodshed, family
dislocation and lewdness, pornography and twisted sexuality across the face of the earth in
bold defiance of your God, with your fists raised in challenge to his, saying stop us, God of
love. His patience is exhausted. His voice to you has never been silent , from the first
preachers on your fields and streets, from the great revivalists to your Jack Hayfords and
Lloyd Ogilvies. Every week, your black preachers thunder against your sins, but you do not
hear, Los Angeles, and when you do hear a fraction, you cry out that no-one can change
these things, let them go on, let them go on...
Cause 2: Global Symbol of Chic Greediness
So excellent in business, so lazy in morals. Such is the greed that has consumed your very
being and that of your citizens. Greed and chic. For you love the shows. You love the glitter.
Tinseltown will be no more. Supermodels will perish with the lowly. Mansions will be raised
just as surely as the hard won homes of the escaping migrant poor of East L.A.
Oh, my people, says the Lord, how could you ignore me and bring such ruin on yourselves?
How could you be so ignorant of my ways, not willing to fight for truth in the public office,
and control of the pornographic machines of Hollywood ? How could you buy into the lie that
the free market is good and godly and should never be interfered with, even when daily the
evil seeps into your homes through a cable? How could the godly sit and do nothing
effective for decades to destroy the core of Hollywood's evil ? Now it is time. It is too late to
redeem or convert these structures. It is too late!
Cause 3: City of Incest
It is too late to salvage your honor, so many raped, sexually molested, so that the city
seethes with guilt, cries out with mental pains, with images no-one ought to bear. The
wounds of immorality lie like great wounds across whole communities, as if a butchers
cleaver has carved up your fabric. Houses and homes destroyed into bitterness, violence
and incest. And you export this! You talk about it on shows! Shows to show evil? And you
call it news! How depraved can a city be? And no Christian effectively raises their voice
against such abominations?
Cause 4: City of Perverted Christianity
Except of course in church. I forgot about your churches. So many! So many! So corrupted!
So filthy! Greed in the offering basket, oppression and manipulation in the leaderships, tinsel
on the stage. But there are some struggling congregations that have not denied my
simplicities. Some that seek truth in choosing different pathways of quiet humility. For their
sakes I have been trying to speak and have withheld my hand. Tinsel, greed and immorality
abound within your walls and reflect in your weekly shows. I cannot abide immorality and
worship, injustice and celebrations. An empty Christianity, from liberal to evangelical to
Pentecostal to Catholic, there is little difference. Yet there are some who have walked in
godly obedience.
Cause 5: A City Symbolizing Perverted Justice
My children, how I would have lead you to become truly a people. But in the name of
freedom you have perverted justice. Are there no law courts that cannot be overturned by
the wealth of your wicked? Your Rodney Kings, your O.J.s are only the tip of the iceberg of
legalized injustice that marks your land. I cannot bear it.
Cause 6: Perversion of Your Gifts to the Nations
I hate you, Los Angeles, with a fury, a vengeful hatred for what you have done to your
migrants, those who came seeking new life, new hope, and to them you gave only bonded
labor. I hate you, Los Angeles, for what you have done against the nations, the shattering of
centuries, shattering of marriages and clans. So much I gave you of creativity, and you
turned it into evil. Such a great city of literature and research, of books and ideas. And you
perverted them into weapons of evil. Called to be a blessing to the nations, you are known
as the scourge of the world. Called to be a light, your media has become a purveyor of
darkness. My soul knows nothing but fury. Why should I not release on you all the
destruction my hands can muster? Why should I not wipe you out of existence? Give me one
reason for allowing you to continue in your pornographic fantasies, in your lust and wine, in
your screenplays of barbarity? But you can give me no reason. Yet I wait. Yet I delay. I
hesitate. For in this great city there are many who know my name. Why did they not rise up?
Why did they not speak out? Why did they not even try to mobilize? Was the technology of
evil too strong for them?
Cause 7: Pastors Failing to Seek Justice
How I have loved the pastors of this city, such a bulwark against a collapsing culture, such
people of strength when all around is crumbling. There is unity in leadership. But they have
not done my will in leading a city into righteousness in its public squares. And there is now
insufficient time to redeem. Pastors have played church and failed to organize the workers
across the city, across the disciplines into effective strike teams to combat the evil, industry
by industry. The pastors wanted the tithe, not the victory outside their churches of societal
change for righteousness, loving their own voice, they would not listen to the voices of the
workshop, the artisan and the factory worker. So injustice has blossomed and can no longer
be cured. Like the bugs on the roots of a dying plant, there is no solution except to root the
plant out and burn it. They have loved revival and church growth for it fills their churches.
They love events, and even prayer events, but they do not organize for justice. They know
nothing of consistent planning to overturn the communal sins. They do not organize to
speak to the sins of the city fathers. They do not know the city fathers. They do not know
their hidden sins. How is it that to them I have given the gifts of discernment - special gifts
to see in and beyond the hearts of men? Yet they have not taken them into the streets , the
legal dens and the marketplace! The hour glass is near empty. The city will be no more.
For these sins, I will destroy it all. It is past my time of warning. This is what the Lord says,

Viv Grigg

WILLIAM BRANHAM'S PROPHECY FOR LOS ANGELES
1960


Along with this prophecy, William Branham wrote the following: “Thou city,
who claims to be the city of angels, who has exalted yourself into heaven
and sent all the dirty, filthy things of fashions and things, until even the
foreign countries come here to pick up our filth and send it away, with your
fine churches and steeples and so forth the way you do, remember one day
you will be laying in the bottom of the sea! Your great honeycomb under you
right now. The wrath of God is belching right beneath you. How much longer
He will hold this sandbar hanging over that, when that ocean out yonder a
mile deep will slide in there plumb back to the Salton Sea. It will be worse
than the last day of Pompeii. Repent Los Angeles! Repent the rest of you and
turn to God! The hour of His wrath is upon the earth. Flee while there is time
to flee and come to Christ.” “So I pray Thee Lord, in Jesus Name, let the
people shake themselves tonight and flee from the wrath that is to come, for
Ichabod is written over the doors and over the nation. A black check mark is
come across it, the Spirit of God is grieved away from it, and they’re weighed
in the balance and found wanting. The feast of King Nebuchadnezzar has
repeated again with drunken parties and half-dressed women calling
themselves Christians.”
Prophetic Alert: Los Angeles 5 Kiloton nuclear explosion

Date Received: 10/20/99, 5:00 A.M. Stephen L. Bening

In a dream, I was standing in a room, looking out of a large plate glass window,
overlooking a city that had low rise buildings of about 5 stories as an average. I
was at a height of about 5 to 10 stories up myself. It was dark outside.

All at once, I noticed a group of fighter planes heading my way. Suddenly, they
fired a weapon in my direction. The weapon emitted three blue pulses of light.
When they hit the area where I was, I had the sense of being exposed to radiation,
or so it seemed, because the effect seemed to fade. I now realized that I was having
a vision within my dream. I went to gather my wife and my five children. Before I
could move much, I saw the flash of a nuclear explosion. A voice accompanied the
flash which said, "Los angeles has just been hit by a 5 Kiloton nuclear explosion."

I was frantically trying to gather my family to head downstairs. All at once, I found
myself in a building that was familiar to me. It was Bening Square, in Carbondale,
Illinois. My father remodeled this office building in 1963. He built a bombshelter
in the basement. I had been in this bombshelter when I was a child.

At any rate, we traversed the stairs, going down into the basement, trying to reach
the bombshelter ahead of the arrival of the blast wave. When I reached the place
where the bombshelter was supposed to be, there was a little room in its place that
was a prayer chapel.

I discovered that the prayer chapel was operated by Dr. Zach Fomum of Cameroon
and his wife Prisca. Prisca began to pray with my wife Erica. I was concerned that
I did not know where my eldest daughter Lorel was.

The dream then ended. I looked behind me on the bed and my digital clock was
just turning over to 5:00 A.M. and the Lord impressed upon my spirit that the
dream had been from him.
Contents of this dream were summarized and quickly sent to Apostle Zach Fomum
in Cameroon. After prayer, I was given some private interpretation relative to my
own personal situation, but I have not been given any more light with respect to the
national implications of the prophetic part of the dream.


Your servant in Christ Jesus, Stephen L. Bening


Destruction of Los Angeles by Fire
Dream
Feb.2006              Brian Charles

I dreamed that I received a prophecy, but didn’t receive the words of it. But
I sent the prophecy to my sister. I saw the whole, entire city of Los Angeles
on FIRE!!! Fierce flames were furiously consuming all of the buildings of that
vast city, while I was watching some buildings burning ferociously by big
consuming fires in the suburb of Montclair at the same time.



Prophetic Word
Given through Brian Charles

"Depart from the city of My wrath." (meaning Los Angeles)


GREAT EARTHQUAKES, SUITCASE NUCLEAR BOMBS, VOLCANOES,
VIRUSES, ECONOMIC COLLAPSE, GEOGRAPHIC SHAKING &
RESHAPING, FLOODS, ETC. WHEN WILL THIS NATION REPENT?Bob
Jones Prophecy
When our cities are leveled. I don't like this thought, but I'm not the only one having these
visions. We're going to have entire cities leveled. I know of a city that is going to be leveled by a
storm. I know of a lot of Midwest cities that are going to get five feet of rain just like that. Do
you have any idea what will happen to a city that is used to getting 24-36 inches of rain in a year,
if they get five foot of it in two or three days? I was told that Hurricane Danny (which He
revealed to us right before it happened exactly how it was going to move) was a parable that He
was trying to show to the prophets. That whole hurricane was a warning to the United States, and
if they want it, they can have it. I'm telling you, when people of old cried out, "God, we are not
able to stand it." Holy people and holy prophets cried out and they stood in the gap, God relented
of the judgment. Now there are going to be cities leveled that can't be stopped. But they can be
warned; and only those who want to be there can be there. I can't stop the leveling of it, but I can
tell you this: God will warn. He will warn those cities. I'VE BEEN TELLING PEOPLE FOR A
YEAR TO GET OUT OF LOS ANGELES. They tell me that they're really brave out there.
(sigh) I'm not that brave. Because that bravery is against God. IF I LIVED IN LOS ANGELES,
I'D GET OUT. I want to tell you something. The EARTHQUAKE is not the only thing you got
to worry about in Los Angeles, and I'm not sure it will be first. In a vision, I saw suitcases being
smuggled in by terrorists into California. They had NUCLEAR BOMBS in them. Two days after
I brought this in Nashville, a Baptist man came and brought the same word, only he didn't bring
it as a prophecy; he brought it as a reality. He had been in Russia, and he knew one of Yeltsin's

               "There are 126 SUITCASE
right hand men who told him:

ATOMIC BOMBS MISSING from our
arsenal. And we know they have been sold to
terrorists, and we believe they are trying to
get them into the United States and Israel."
I don't believe we've got to 2,000. I've been asking the church to begin to intercede that these
suitcases be caught; that these terrorists be caught. Because Satan intends to start the THIRD
WORLD WAR ahead of time. We are going to have a third world war. It's going to happen. But
I'm sure it's not going to happen before the timing that has been set. [If] one of those explode in
San Francisco, we'd have bombers immediately on their way with atomic warheads and we'd be
in a Third World War. By the way, all of your money would be worthless then. And everything
that you live by would be worthless. What would you do for WATER? That would be blown up;
you wouldn't have any water. AND THAT'S [WATER] THE MAIN DANGER IN
CALIFORNIA. Those things are going to happen. Do you know what's around Mammoth Lake
and some of those places? All the water flumes would break to Los Angeles. There's a dam there
called Hoover. When that thing breaks, have you any idea of how many? There's 25 million
people it would affect. When that thing breaks, I saw underneath the Salton Sea, and I've spoke
that the real trembling and everything would begin around the Salton Sea, and that the next
warning would come around the Salton Sea. Well, it did. Joshua Tree and Landers, is where this
last one came, which was a warning! I believe the next one is getting ready to happen when this
volcano will erupt when the plates can't take the pressure anymore. And I believe the pressure
are melting the plates down there to where this has got to be vented, and these earthquakes are
just a sign of what is getting ready to happen. It's getting ready to blow! When it does, it will
break loose all the way to the Sea of Cortez [the Gulf of California], right up the Los Angeles
river. And that plate in there will separate from the United States, and you can drive a boat up
that river. You can go from the Gulf of Cortez to the Pacific Ocean [Bob mistakenly said the
"Atlantic" ocean]. And Death Valley will be a great inland sea. And we aren't far from that. I
really expect though, something Jim Bakker said, even before this happens, OUR ECONOMY
GETS DESTROYED WITH A GREAT EARTHQUAKE IN JAPAN. TOKYO. Some of those
around; it's already started. And they pull all of our money out, and our stock market plummets
(and it's in the Shepherd's Rod). So all these things are ready. They aren't....This isn't something
we're trying to scare you with. It's something we're trying to prepare you to SURVIVE. For one
of the worst things that is going to happen to many of you at that time is FEARING OF FEAR.
It's running around like a chicken with his head cut off. It's time for you to get grounded in your
faith. You're going to have to put on Christ to survive. You're going to have to take off the old
man and the unregenerated nature, and put on Christ.


Dream of Los Angeles NUKED -Revelation 18
Richard Riding
Dream on 6/16/85 L. A. NUKED

I had a dream , I don't know if I was in the spirit or body. I was at a fire station in Los Angeles, CA, early in
the morning hours. Its as if I was transferred there for a temporary stay. I had my uniform and fire gear in
my car. I reported to the captain and was trying to find a bed to sleep in for the balance of the night. I went
to the dormitory, upstairs, and it was full of beds with men sleeping in them. It was crowded and I found a
bed with out a mattress. So I decided to go down stairs, when I got there, there were other firemen milling
around out in the front of the station. I could see their faces and I knew some of them from my earlier
days as a fireman.(1962-1978). While outside I was talking to three chiefs of different rank. While we were
talking , a particular high ranking chief ( I don't know who he was) came running out of the fire house
towards his chiefs car in his turnout clothes, in a panic and I mean Panic. He tried to get in his chiefs car
and drive away,!but his aid (fireman who drives for him) stopped him from doing so. He kept hollering, "I
have to get out of here, I have to get out of here". The next thing I heard was a whaling noise (siren). I
looked up and heard a noise and saw, it seemed like thousands of jet aircraft traveling fast with their
afterburners blasting. (I was in the airforce for four years.) There were literally thousands of them. It was
dark in the early morning and I could see the flames coming out of their engines tail pipes. I made a
commit to one of the chiefs, "There is thousands of them".( They were fighter aircraft.) The chief was
looking at me with a scared look and I said to him, "Jesus is coming". When I said this there was a bright
flash in the sky and the heavens glowed with a bright light. I fell to the ground and heard screaming of the
men around me. I could feel the heat of the light around me ( It was an atomic bomb) exploding in the Los
Angeles area. I then woke up and had the strangest feeling of emptiness that this is going to happen in
Los Angeles, IT WAS SO REAL.

Richard D. Riding Sr.




                                   San Diego Nuked?
                                       Garrett Crawford - 4/15/07

I was standing over a small model city that had a toy train in it. This city was San Diego.
The toy train ran all through the city and there was a nuclear bomb on the train. I was so
obsessed with this train and the nuclear bomb that was inside it. I would watch the train
and see where it went, constantly wondering when and where the bomb inside of it
would go off. This train was the focus of my attention and I did nothing but think about it.
After a while I began to lose my focus and my obsession for the train and the bomb, and
I walked away from the model city. After I walked away, the train stopped and I never
got to see if the bomb went off, if it ever even did.
http://www.unleavenedbreadministries.org/?page=memphis-mushroomcloud




California Nuked Into the Sea?
Sultana - 9/17/07
The year before 9/11, I dreamed of 4 explosions. I told my husband that the World
Trade Center was blown up and I saw an explosion on the ground, then I saw the
Pentagon explode.
In the fall of 2003 I began to hear the sound of pinging like that of a submarine. I began
to pray and ask God what this was and He gave me this dream: I saw a small black
submarine, shaped like a fat cigar off the cost of California. Then I saw it fire a missile
and hit the land, breaking off and sinking a big part of California. Then I saw flood
waters sweep over a large part of the rest of California and I woke up.
(Note from David: I have heard this before for California and Florida. The Russians and
Americans were doing research to use nukes to turn the earth beneath large areas fluid
to sink them.)

http://www.unleavenedbreadministries.org/?page=calnuked




Nuclear Warning
http://exodus2006.com/nukes.htm
I originally saw this warning at a page on at Asia Times Online website but it
was retracted a few hours later. You can view the retraction and I have
included most of the relevant text below on this page.
There is a good article about this story at Earth Changes TV and there is
more at the 'Details Here' website. Although the verdict of the Snopes
website is that the statement is a hoax, the evidence that they do have
suggests it wasn't written with the intention of being read by an English
speaking audience, and they don't know who wrote it originally.

It is not possible to be sure if the content of the article is true - but it is all
possible. There are supporting articles at:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=25250
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/asia_china/story.jsp?story=102409
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/7/14/214727.shtml

The Interview:
Al-Jazeera was granted an interview with one Mohammed al-Usuquf,
allegedly al-Qaeda's number three. Al-Usuquf's most startling revelation is
that "Atomic bombs won't be launched, they are already there". "Seven
nuclear heads have already been positioned on American soil, before
September 11, and they are ready to be detonated. Before September 11,
American security was a fiasco, and even later, if we needed, we could
position the bombs there. They arrived through seaports, as normal cargo. A
nuclear head is not bigger than a fridge, so it can easily be camouflaged as
one. Thousands of containers arrive at a seaport every day, and even with
very efficient security, it's impossible to check and examine each one of
them."
Al-Usuquf says that the bombs were bought on the black market: five from
the former USSR and two from Pakistan. The five Russian heads "are from T-
3 missiles, also known as RD-107, and their power is around 100 kilotons
each, that is five times the Hiroshima bomb. The Pakistani ones are less
powerful, something around 10 kilotons each."
Each of the Russian bombs would have cost around $200 million. Al-Qaeda
was able to raise the money "because we have many sponsors. Many
countries sponsor us, and also some very rich people." And not all of these
are Arab countries. "Some European countries as well are also interested in
the fall of the US." As to the "rich people", they are "people who are also
tired of seeing the US bleeding the rest of the world."
And Iraq's Saddam Hussein, says Al-Usuquf, is not one of these people, "but
just a collaborator, represented by Abdul TawabHawaish, his vice prime
minister and responsible for Iraq's arms program".
Al-Usuquf says that the bombs cannot be detected by US authorities. "Even if
they are old, they were modernized and are very well hidden. Even if they
were located, they have auto-detonation mechanisms in case something or
someone gets close. Even an electromagnetic pulse is not capable of
deactivating them." The bombs allegedly cannot be detected because "they
are enveloped in thick layers of lead". They could be detonated "by various
methods - cell phone call, radio frequency, seismic shock or by their
regressive clock".
Al-Usuquf details the whole plan. "First, one head would be detonated, which
would cause the deaths of 800,000 to 1 million people and a chaos never
seen before. During this chaos, two or three planes, which are now
disassembled inside barns near empty roads in the US countryside, would
take off in suicide missions to pulverize another two or three big American
cities with chemicals. Once the disease was identified, all seaports and
airports would be quarantined. Land borders would also be closed. No plane,
boat or car would enter or leave the US. This would be total chaos." The first
target would be the city "that would offer the best conditions, for example
bright sky and winds of eight or more miles an hour blowing towards the
center of the country, so radioactive dust can contaminate the largest
possible area".
This attack would not knock out the US, recognizes al-Usuquf, "But the
process would be initiated. As with the World Trade Center, it would be just a
question of time for the whole economic structure to be turned to dust. If the
objectives are reached with one bomb and diseases, probably we will save
the lives of other people, but it's risky, and probably six more bombs will be
detonated, one a week, and more attacks with chemical weapons will be
launched." According to estimates made by al-Usuquf "and Ayman al-
Zawahiri", al-Qaeda's number 2, about 15 million people would die, victims
of the bombs and the radiation. Among those contaminated by diseases, "25
percent will die, a figure around more than 5 million, plus many others due
to the chaos and disorder".
Al-Usuquf does not fear an American military response. "Even if five or 10
cities are chosen at random to be destroyed, it will still be a small price to
pay. The problem is that the economic despair will be so great that even if it
saves [money] by not using weapons, American liquidity will be near zero,
and the US will make more money selling a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier to
Turkey or Italy for $5 billion, because they will urgently need to recapitalize.
But it will be too late. Moreover, what will remain of an American soldier's
morale to fight knowing that his whole family died and his country ceased to
exist? To fight for what?"
The world economy would not collapse, says al-Usuquf, although "in the
beginning, it will be very difficult. But without the US the world will soon rise
in a more just and fraternal manner. Nothing can stop the plan."
And whatever America does, "it's too late." When will the attack begin? "I
can't tell."
Newer Version
Sunday, December 7, 2003
Q: "How does Al Qaeda intend to destroy the most powerful nation in
history?"
A: "It's a question of logistics. Using its own poison, that is,
attacking the heart of what they consider the most important thing in
the world: money." -Mr. Mohammed Al-Asuquf, Al Qaeda Third-in-command
Al-Asuquf: "The beginning will be the detonation of a nuclear device,
which will cause the death of between 800 thousand and one million
people and create chaos on a scale never seen before. During this
chaos, two or three crop sprayers that are now dismantled and stored
in granaries [silos?] close to little-used highways in the
countryside will take off on suicide missions to spray two or three
large American cities with smallpox. That means that once the
smallpox has been identified, all airports and seaports will be
closed by quarantine. Land borders will likewise be shut down. Not
one airplane, ship or vehicle will enter or leave the United States.
This will cause total chaos. White House Press secretary Ari
Fleischman will be very busy."

HOW, WHY AND WHEN TO DESTROY THE UNITED STATES
Is this interview a hoax as the "powers-that-be" want us to believe?
When you read it, you will see why it has been suppressed, especially
to citizens in the United States...
Yes, it is a hoax, to the extent the masses continue to believe in
the reality of Al Qaeda, rather than its creators-worldwide
intelligence agencies funding the whole show, and in the case of the
Mossad, its actual participation at strategic intervals.
December 1, 2002 -
The following interview was conducted by a reporter for the Al-
Jazeera network with the third-in-command of the Al Qaeda
organization, Mr. Mohammed Al-Asuquf. Al-Asuquf's background is
impressive; a doctorate in physics and masters in international
economics. In the interview, he talks of Al Qaeda's plans with total
detachment, with deep knowledge and an unshakeable commitment to his
cause.
This interview was sent to Abel-Bari Atwan, chief editor of Al Quds,
an Arabic-language newspaper published in London, but was never
printed, due to its highly revealing [inflammatory?] contents. A copy
of the interview came to Foz-do-Iguaçu, and was translated into
Portuguese by a university professor in the city's Arab community.
This is probably the only existing version of this interview not in
Arabic.
Al-Jazeera: What is the objective of the Al Qaeda network?
Al-Asuquf: To destroy the Great Satan, that is, the United States and
Israel.
Incorrect, the Great Satan is the reptilian/Illuminati cabal
manipulating the world's power positions.
Al-Jazeera: Why?
Al-Asuquf: The USA over the past 60 years has been impregnating
[infecting] the world with its arrogance, greed and malfeasance. It
is the incarnation of all that is evil. The people of this planet
don't deserve this torture.
There is no USA per se; the satanically controlled leadership marches
to the drumbeat of the long planned agenda for singular global
control, currently in its final stages. The destruction of the US,
via the Trojan horse of terrorism, is the created problem, while also
serving as a final catalyst for global governance.
Al-Jazeera: Isn't this view somewhat one-sided?
Of course it is, how else could conflict be elevated unless both
sides created reasons to do so.
Al-Asuquf: No; one only has to observe recent events. The disrespect
of the Kyoto treaty; the case of the Permanent Court of International
Justice, their inaction with regards to our Palestinian brothers; the
financial greed and absurd speculations in Third World countries; the
complete indifference to other oppressed people and countless other
situations which all of the world's leaders well know. And on top of
all that, the Bush doctrine of "shoot first and ask questions later."
This is an unacceptable abuse and will therefore have very grave
consequences.
Who can argue with those statements?
Al-Jazeera: But the isn't the development and influence of America
the fruit of its own competence?
Al-Asuquf: Competence in extortion, competence in subjugation,
competence in lying. After the Second World War, the USA was the only
industrialized country with its manufacturing infrastructure intact.
Loaning money like a good loan shark, it ended up becoming a very
rich and powerful country; however, its greed remained undiminished.
Today, Americans live like maharajas [?], wasting more than any other
people, spending more than $80 billion per year just on gambling.
They've lost any notion of spirituality and live in constant sin.
With each passing day the USA demonstrates that it doesn't know how
to live with other peoples; for this, it deserves destruction.
Yes, this is true, but the U.S. change of character is simply the
movie being played out, regardless of whether Al-Asuquf is a willing
pawn or not.
Al-Jazeera: Wouldn't it be easier to simply assassinate President
George Bush?
Al-Asuquf: In the first place, it would do no good, other than
turning him into a martyr. When you face a powerful enemy, the best
strategy is not to kill him, but to make him lose his leadership due
to his incompetence, and let him live to watch this unfold.
His removal is immaterial.
Al-Jazeera: Does the Al Qaeda network have the military capacity to
make war on the United States?
Al-Asuquf: If we analyze history, we will see that all great wars,
before they were started, were based on previously established
concepts [of war]. But if we observe well, we will see that these
concepts and strategies came to nothing, since a new type of war was
ultimately waged. An example is the construction of the Maginot line
by the French before the First World War, which, in reality proved to
be completely useless against the invading forces. Aircraft carriers,
nuclear submarines, and spy satellites will be useless in the next
war.
Al-Jazeera: American authorities hold more than 1,000 people
suspected of terrorism since September 11th. Won't this compromise Al
Queda's plans?
Al-Asuquf: Of those imprisoned, perhaps 20 to 30 percent belong to Al
Queda. Moreover, they are from the second echelon. We have more than
500 members of the first echelon and 800 from the second, inside the
United States.
Al-Jazeera: What do you mean by first and second echelons?
Al-Asuquf: In the first echelon are Al Qaeda members who have been in
the United States for more than 10 years, many married with children.
They have detailed knowledge of our plans and are just waiting for a
phone call. They are also known as "sleepers." Those of the second
echelon have arrived in the last five years and have no idea of our
plans.
Al-Jazeera: Are even those who are married, with children, ready to
die with their families?
Al-Asuquf: Yes. All of them are ready to die. Long live September
11th.
Yes, it was the kickoff to the big party.
Al-Jazeera: What was September 11th to Al Qaeda's overall plans?
Al-Asuquf: As a general step, it was just the beginning. It was a way
of calling the world's attention to what is still to come.
Al-Jazeera: How many members does Al Qaeda have?
Al-Asuquf: In the first echelon, about 5,000; in the second, about
20,000, all over the world.
Al-Jazeera: In the detention camp at Guantanamo, are there any
members of the first echelon?
Al-Asuquf: No, in fact, many of those there are not even Al Qaeda
members.
Al-Jazeera: How does Al Qaeda intend to destroy the most powerful
nation in history?
Al-Asuquf: It's a question of logistics. Using its own poison, that
is, attacking the heart of what they consider the most important
thing in the world: money.
Al-Jazeera: How so?
Al-Asuquf: The American economy is an economy of false appearances.
There is no real economic ballast to the American economy. The
American GDP of is something around $10 trillion, of which just 1
percent represents agriculture, and just 24 percent represents
industry. Therefore, 75 percent of the American GDP is service and
most of this is financial speculation. For those who understand
economics, and it appears that the American Secretary of the
Treasury, Paul O'Neil, doesn't or doesn't see it, it's enough to say
that the USA acts like a huge "dot-com," and dollars, strictly
speaking, are its shares.
Al-Jazeera: Can you explain that?
Al-Asuquf: The value of a company's shares is directly proportional
to the profitability of the enterprise. When a business is just a
service provider and doesn't produce any durable goods, the value of
its shares depends on its credibility. Which is to say that if the
credibility of the USA were shaken, its shares (the dollar) would
fall with incredible rapidity and the entire American economy would
begin to collapse.
Al-Jazeera: How can you be so sure of this?
Al-Asuquf: On a smaller scale, it's exactly what large financial
groups do to the countries of the third world to reap profits in one
month that Swiss banks couldn't get in four or five years.
Al-Jazeera: So how will Al Qaeda shock the American economy to this
point?
Al-Asuquf: By provoking a deficit of between $50 and $70 trillion
dollars, the equivalent of the United States' GDP for five to seven
years.
Al-Jazeera: How will this be done?
Al-Asuquf: With the destruction of the seven largest American cities,
along with other measures.
Al-Jazeera: By what means will this be done?
Al-Asuquf: Using atomic bombs.
Nothing new here.Sollog has warned for three years now to leave all
western cities due to the danger of nuclear attacks, which he says,
will destroy major cities and with it the global power of the U.S.
as well.
Al-Jazeera: With all of the security in the USA, how, hypothetically,
will these bombs be smuggled onto American soil?
Al-Asuquf: They won't be smuggled in, they're already there.
Al-Jazeera: What are you saying?
Al-Asuquf: There are already seven nuclear devices on American soil
which were put in place before September 11th and are ready to be
detonated.
Al-Jazeera: How did they get in to the USA?
Al-Asuquf: Before September 11, American security was a fiasco, and
even after, were it necessary, we could manage to smuggle bombs into
the United States. They entered through seaports, as normal cargo.
Previously reported during the past few years.
Al-Jazeera: How is that possible?
Al-Asuquf: A nuclear device is no bigger than a refrigerator;
therefore, it can be easily camouflaged as one. Millions of cargo
containers arrive in seaports each day, and no matter how efficient
security is, it's impossible to check, search through and examine
each container.
Al-Jazeera: Where did these atomic bombs come from?
Al-Asuquf: They were purchased on the black market.
Al-Jazeera: From whom?
Al-Asuquf: We bought five from the defunct Soviet Union and two more
from Pakistan.
Previously reported as well.
Al-Jazeera: How is it possible to buy an atomic bomb? Isn't there
security?
Al-Asuquf: Before 1989 it was practically impossible, however after
the fall of the Berlin Wall, the Russian army began a process of self
destruction, and some high generals began to lose their privileges,
and therefore, highly susceptible to corruption. Even General Lebeb,
now deceased, and Hans Blix, the head of the arms inspection
commission of the United Nations, have stated this, notwithstanding
denials by Russian Defense Minister SegueyIvanov.
Al-Jazeera: How much does a nuclear bomb cost?
Al-Asuquf: Somewhere around $200 million.
Al-Jazeera: How did Al Qaeda get this money?
Al-Asuquf: We have numerous sponsors.
Yes, quite accurate. All Illuminati front organizations.
Al-Jazeera: Who are they?
Al-Asuquf: There are a number of countries, which support us, and
also numerous wealthy individuals.
Al-Jazeera: Are all of these countries Arab?
Al-Asuquf: No, there are some European countries as well which have
an interest in the fall of the USA.
Al-Jazeera: Who are these wealthy individuals?
Al-Asuquf: People who are also tired of watching the USA suck the
wealth out of the rest of the world.
Not exactly. First of all they are not exactly people, secondly,
they intend to take it all for themselves.
Al-Jazeera: Is Saddam Hussein one of them?
Al-Asuquf: You could say that he's just one of the collaborators,
through Abdul Tawab Mullah Hawaish, his vice-prime minister and the
person responsible for Iraq's arms program.
Al-Jazeera: Are these atomic bombs powerful ones?
Al-Asuquf: The five Russian devices are from the old T-3 missiles,
also known as RD-107s, and their potency is something around 100
kilotons each, that is, 5 times as powerful as the Hiroshima bomb.
The Pakistani bombs are less powerful, somewhere around 10 kilotons.
This is new. My information, passed on three years ago, indicated
only lower yield suitcase devices.
Al-Jazeera: Can't the bombs be detected and disarmed by American
authorities?
Al-Asuquf: No, in spite of their age they've undergone modernization
and are well hidden. Even if they were found, they have auto
detonation provisions should anything get close to them. Even
electromagnetic pulses would be incapable of deactivating them.
Al-Jazeera: Don't they emit radiation? Can't they be detected?
Al-Asuquf: No. They are wrapped in thick leaden cases.
Al-Jazeera: A suspected Pakistani ship was recently searched and all
that was found were lead bars. Does this have anything to do with the
bombs?
Al-Asuquf: Yes, however that lead was just an extra layer, and was
not essentially necessary.
Al-Jazeera: How will the bombs be detonated?
Al-Asuquf: There are numerous methods, a cell-phone call, radio
frequency, seismic shocks or by timer.
Al-Jazeera: Once detonated, how many deaths will be caused by these
bombs?
Al-Asuquf: It depends, since our plans are very malleable.
Al-Jazeera: So what is the entire plan?
Al-Asuquf: The beginning will be the detonation of a nuclear device,
which will cause the death of between 800 thousand and one million
people and create chaos on a scale never seen before. During this
chaos, two or three crop sprayers that are now dismantled and stored
in granaries [silos?] close to little-used highways in the
countryside will take off on suicide missions to spray two or three
large American cities with smallpox. That means that once the
smallpox has been identified, all airports and seaports will be
closed by quarantine. Land borders will likewise be shut down. Not
one airplane, ship or vehicle will enter or leave the United States.
This will cause total chaos. White House Press secretary Ari
Fleischman will be very busy.
Al-Jazeera: But the American government has guaranteed that within
five days it could produce enough smallpox vaccine to inoculate the
entire population.
Al-Asuquf: There will be simultaneous suicide attacks against the
vaccine production plants.
Al-Jazeera: Which will be the first city?
Al-Asuquf: The first city will be that in which optimal conditions
present themselves, for example, clear skies, and winds of eight
miles-per-hour or less in the direction of the country's center so
that radioactive dust can contaminate the maximum possible area.
Al-Jazeera: Will this attack annihilate the USA?
Al-Asuquf: No. But the process will have begun. Who will buy food
products from the United States knowing they may have been
contaminated by radiation? Who will travel to the United States
knowing the possibility of contracting smallpox? Who will continue to
invest in American institutions? Just as with the World Trade Center,
it will be simply a question of time before the entire economic
structure collapses and turns to dust. If our objectives are reached
with one bomb and the smallpox, probably we'll save the lives of
others, however that's risky [unlikely?], and it's probable that six
more bombs will be detonated, one per week, and other attacks with
chemical weapons will be carried out.
Al-Jazeera: How many innocent people will die?
Al-Asuquf: According to estimates made by me and Ayman Al-Zawahiri,
somewhere around 15 million due to the atomic bombs and their
radiation. Of those exposed to smallpox, 25 percent will die,
approximately five million, and many more due to the ensuing chaos
and disorder.
Al-Jazeera: What about the American military response?
Al-Asuquf: There will practically be none. Even if five or ten cities
were chosen at random to be destroyed, that would still be a small
price to pay. The problem is the economic despair will be so great
that even economizing by not using arms unnecessarily will occur,
since the liquidity of American goods will be almost zero and at that
point the United States will make more selling its Nimitz-class
aircraft carriers, which cost about five billion dollars, to Turkey
or Italy for one billion dollars, since the country will so urgently
need to recapitalize, though it will be too late. Moreover, how will
the morale of American soldiers be knowing that their entire families
have died and their country no longer exists. Fight for what?
Al-Jazeera: And won't the global economy also be ruined?
Al-Asuquf: In the beginning it will be very difficult; a serious
economic crisis will ensue. However, without the United States, the
world will soon arise in a more just and fraternal manner.
Al-Jazeera: And Israel?
Al-Asuquf: As they say... it will be dessert.
Al-Jazeera: Does bin Laden's spokesman, Sulaiman Abu Gheith, know
that you are giving this interview?
Al-Asuquf: It was he and bin Laden who suggested I give it.
Al-Jazeera: Osama bin Laden is still alive?
Al-Asuquf: He is quite healthy, alongside his commanders Mohammed
Atef and Khalid Shaik Mohammed and Mullah Omar.
Al-Jazeera: Aren't you fearful that Al Qaeda's plans will be
discovered?
No, just the link to the Illuminati.
Al-Asuquf: The plan is already in its countdown, and nothing can stop
it.
Al-Jazeera: Not even if the United States asks forgiveness and
changes its attitudes?
Al-Asuquf: That won't happen, and even if it did, it's too late.
Al-Jazeera: When will the attack begin?
Al-Asuquf: I can't reveal that. Allah Akbar.
Suppose terrorists set off a nuclear bomb in a
container in the Port of Long Beach?




Suppose:
"...terrorists conceal a 10-kiloton nuclear bomb in a shipping container and ship it to the Port of
Long Beach. Unloaded onto a pier, it explodes shortly thereafter. This is referred to as a
“ground-burst” as opposed to an “airburst” explosion."
This is the sort of thing they think about at RAND: New RAND study models consequences of a
nuke attack on a port. (Charles Meade and Roger Molander, August 2006)
I learned about this from the Homeland Security Watch blog
The immediate impact is:
   •   The infrastructure and ships in the Port of Long Beach and the adjoining Port
       of Los Angeles are completely destroyed by the blast and fires.
   •   Sixty thousand people die or will die soon because of direct blast effects and
       radiation poisoning.
   •   The radioactive fallout of water and sediment from the port exposes 150,000
       people to hazardous radiation levels, requiring prompt medical attention.
   •   Six million people will try to evacuate the Los Angeles region to avoid the
       radioactive fallout.
   •   Gasoline is in critically short supply because of the effects on refineries in the
       Long Beach area. Long Beach refines approximately one-third of gasoline
       west of the Rockies, and there is no pipeline infrastructure to import supplies
       to the region.
   •   Radioactive fallout contaminates a 500-km region, prohibiting residence for
       10–20 years. Two to three million residents will require relocation facilities.
It may not be simple to redirect incoming shipping to alternative ports - even with advance
planning:
The principal challenge on this issue involves the conflict between the political desire to mitigate
the risks of future attack compared with the business requirements for continued operation of the
ports and the global shipping supply chain... Viewed from a national security perspective, there
could be an immediate call to close all U.S. ports to incoming traffic. In contrast, parts of the
business community might advocate an early opening of the ports. However, financial and real
estate interests may require financial risk protection before shipping could resume, and this
would be almost impossible to acquire following the Long Beach explosion. At the same time,
there could be a large-scale exodus from U.S. port cities by local populations fearing the
prospect of a second attack. Taken together, these results suggest there are reasonable prospects
for extended closures of all U.S. ports following the Long Beach scenario, or at least for periods
of substantially reduced operations. The issue is analogous to the cancellation of airline traffic
following the 9/11 attacks, but the problem is much greater given the difficulties of screening
20,000 shipping containers per day originating from ports all over the world.
From a business perspective, the problems revolve around the vital economic role of U.S. ports
and the global shipping supply chain. Taken together, the Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles
are the largest port of entry to America, and the third largest in the world, handling 30 percent
of U.S. shipping imports by value in 2003. If all U.S. ports were closed, it would have large
economic implications for almost all domestic business operations, and it would lead to severe
disruptions in the availability of basic goods and petroleum in the United States. That is, there
is a high probability that the Long Beach scenario would have large economic consequences at
great distances from the initial nuclear explosion. It would also have important repercussions
for global business activity because the value of imports and exports from all U.S. ports
represents 7.5 percent of world trade activity. In the wake of these economic effects, it seems
reasonable to assume that there would be large declines in world stock markets, in contrast to
the relatively limited financial losses that followed the 9/11 attacks. While those attacks were
unprecedented, they had only minor consequences for the economic infrastructure of the United
States.
In February I posted on a relatively more upbeat assessment of an attack on a port: What do you
do, when the bomber gets through? (February 26, 2006)
August 20, 2006 |Permalink

TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341d9cb353ef00d8342b70e753ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Suppose terrorists set off a nuclear bomb in a
container in the Port of Long Beach?:
» Rand Study of Nuclear Terrorism from EclectEcon
Suppose: "...terrorists conceal a 10-kiloton nuclear bomb in a shipping container and ship it to
the Port of Long Beach. Unloaded onto a pier, it explodes shortly thereafter. This is referred to as
a “ground-burst” as oppos... [Read More]
Tracked on August 23, 2006 at 07:56 AM
What do you do, when the bomber gets
through?
The terrorist bomber won't always get through, but the odds are good that, despite our best
efforts, he'll (or she'll) get through once and a while. The damage will be reduced if we've
thought ahead. This goes for port security.
Jonathan Haveman is a trade economist. Here's another input into the port security production
function, from his publication, In Search of Greater Policy Vision for Port Planning and Security
(February 2004):
There are big questions regarding port security that are not being asked. Perhaps the most
important is: What is the most effective way to reduce the likelihood of an attack on a U.S. port?

Here, there is a pair of alternatives: eliminating vulnerabilities, as current policies do, or
implementing a good recovery plan, which current policies fail to do. Although these are
alternatives, they are not exclusive. The most effective protection will likely involve a
combination of the two. This is so, because in reality, it is unlikely that all vulnerable points will
be covered. Given that there is always some risk remaining, the most cost-effective means for
reducing risk further may be through reducing the attractiveness of the target.

By way of example, suppose that the ports on the San Pedro Bay were put out of commission by
an explosion for six months. In the absence of a well thought-out recovery plan, much of the
trade destined for U.S. shores would sit idly by as flows were haphazardly redirected. With a
plan in place for this eventuality, ships far out to sea could easily redirect as soon as the event
occurred, reducing the adjustment cost associated with the port closure. As the cost of a port
closure is reduced, the appeal of an attack on the port is similarly reduced. Pursuing both sides
of the coin would seem the prudent approach to reducing the likelihood and resulting impact of
an attack on a U.S. port.

In order to most efficiently allocate the limited resources devoted to port security, spending
should be focused on effectively reducing the likelihood of an event. This means paying attention
to both increasing the difficulty of assaulting a port and mitigating the costs of an event after the
fact. Coming to this conclusion requires greater vision than is currently evidenced in current
port security planning.
I'm not so sure that this would deter an attack on a port. This probably wouldn't affect the
emotional impact of a successful attack; I think that impact is the terrorist's main objective. But
it would reduce the economic costs of an attack, and contribute to the economy's resiliency in the
face of the terrorist threat.
I learned about Haveman's work from Daniel Drezner, who recommends: "An excellent primer
on port security can be found in Jon D. Haveman, Howard J. Shatz, and Ernesto A. Vilchis
(2005) "U.S. Port Security Policy after 9/11: Overview and Evaluation", Journal of Homeland
Security and Emergency Management: Vol. 2: No. 4, Article 1."
A subscription is required for access to this. Here is a PowerPoint presentation by these authors
on this issue: An Overview of Port Security Programs .
Revised: title change Feb 27.
Osama's nuclear bomb
Posted: November 08, 2001
1:00 am Eastern

By David Dolan
© 2011 WorldNetDaily.com
Does Osama bin Laden possess the ultimate weapon – a nuclear bomb – in one form or another?
Amid the heightened terrorist alert in the United States and elsewhere, examination of this
radiating topic reverberates around the halls of Western governments, security services and in the
international press.
Meanwhile, I continue to be haunted by the words of an FBI agent, spoken to me when I was
visiting Washington, D.C., in 1995. He revealed that federal officials had uncovered "substantial
evidence" that bin Laden's al-Qaida terrorist network had smuggled several Soviet-built nuclear
suitcase bombs into the United States. Although the ultimate proof of this contention would be
an explosion that no one but America's worst enemies wants to take place, the circumstantial
evidence is apparently compelling enough to keep sending Vice President Dick Cheney to his
"undisclosed location."
The fact that the Kremlin built such weapons is accepted by most Western spy agencies, even if
one of the first persons to publicly reveal it was the controversial Russian General Alexander
Lebed. He claimed in 1996 that negligent post-Soviet Russian officials had lost track of an
astounding 134 of these deadly mini devices, thought to be capable of completely leveling
everything within a couple miles of ground zero – not to mention covering an even wider area
with carcinogenic nuclear poisons.
Even if just a few of the suitcase nukes are unaccounted for, it would be a few too many.
Reports continue to circulate that some of these field nuclear devices ended up in the hands of
Chechen Muslim groups, who passed them along (for a substantial price) to bin Laden. While
this has not been concretely proved as far as I can tell, it is clear to Western security agencies
that Chechen rebels have close connections to al-Qaida and its notorious leader. That bin Laden
desperately desires to acquire nuclear bombs is also quite evident, given that he has publicly said
so.
On top of the strong possibility that the Arabian terrorist leader has gotten his jihad hands on
KGB-built portable-luggage bombs, it is clear that he has strong supporters in the Pakistani
nuclear scientific community. Pakistan's chief nuclear engineer, Bashiruddin Mahmoud, has not
hidden his glowing affection for the turbaned desert warrior. Still, it is thought to be extremely
unlikely that he might have been able to arrange a nuclear weapons transfer to al-Qaida
operatives. Yet his advice would be invaluable if bin Laden succeeded in getting the material
needed to build a nuclear device from elsewhere, as many experts fear he has probably done.
The contention that bin Laden would have no moral qualms about using such a hideous weapon
on his perceived infidel enemies, even if most were civilians, is self evident. After all, it was not
the recently revealed CIA office near the World Trade Center that was his main target on Sept.
11. The Saudi dissident realized that the twin towers would be full on a Tuesday morning with
civilian workers going about their daily jobs. If 5,000 infidel lives are good to take, surely
500,000 are much better.
Chemical strike on New York
Seemingly confirming that mass slaughter is the ultimate goal of some Islamic terrorist militants,
I was told by another American security official while visiting the Midwest a few years ago that
the original World Trade Center attack in 1993 had a non-conventional chemical component. He
further revealed that this fact was concealed from the public on orders of senior officials in the
Clinton administration, although he did not impute them with evil motives in doing so. He
opined that the administration apparently did not want to "worry" the general public with such
frightening details.
According to my source, deadly nerve agents were placed amid the explosives that blew up in
the parking garage underneath the WTC. The Arab terrorists – whom he thought were probably
linked to Saddam Hussein – apparently hoped that the debilitating chemicals would be widely
dispersed by the truck bomb explosion, killing thousands of people in nearby portions of lower
Manhattan. In the actual event, the heat of the intense fire that followed the powerful blast
quickly destroyed all but a few traces of the chemical agents, said my source.
There is substantial circumstantial evidence that this same "look the other way" attitude carried
the day after the TWA Flight 800 explosion in the skies off of Long Island a few years later.
After all, why spoil the "feel good" '90s with the reality that despite the collapse of the dreaded
Soviet Union, America still had real enemies out there plotting to reduce her to ashes?
Some who see darker motives behind such apparent government complacency might wonder if
the secular humanist propensity to totally ignore the Islamic fundamentalist terrorist threat until
forced to do otherwise on Sept. 11 does not reveal something far more sinister. Indeed, there is
apparent room to wonder if some Western secular-humanist leaders – especially those who
openly disdain their fellow humans who choose to look to the heavens for Divine guidance –
have not long viewed the growing Islamic terrorist menace as a powerful tool to further their
ultimate goal of ushering in a New World Order.
Expert warrior
Although Osama bin Laden and his mainly Middle East henchmen might appear to come from
the Middle Ages to most folks in the West, he is clearly a very clever man. This is demonstrated
by his carefully crafted video sermons, designed to pull every possible chain to stir up the
Muslim masses in support of his self-declared holy war. This guy knows what he is after, and
probably has a long-range game plan of how to get there. It may well include a nuclear explosion
at an appropriate moment.
If you have been following this potential hair-splitting aspect of the unfolding terrorist story in
recent weeks, you might know that many nuclear experts doubt that the alleged missing Soviet
devices are still able to perform their intended task. Such scientists assure us that the tritium
triggers needed to detonate the portable bombs have undoubtedly decayed by now, rendering the
devices useless. However, some note that it is possible to recharge the triggers for someone who
knows his way around such technical concerns, which might include the Pakistani scientist
Mahmoud.
At any rate, it is relatively easy to produce a so-called "dirty bomb" comprised of regular
explosives laced with nuclear waste materials. Although the kill ratio would be relatively modest
from such a blast, it would still act as a powerful psychological weapon in a terrorist war
currently focused on the threat of more anthrax attacks.
I have not been able to secure any official comment about recent media reports that alert Israeli
security forces intercepted a Palestinian terrorist trying to smuggle such a bomb into the Tel
Aviv area a couple weeks ago. It seems that government leaders here think that the public is
stressed out enough as it is, which is surely the case.
However, such an interception might help explain why Prime Minister Ariel Sharon felt
compelled to cancel his important trip to the United States this week for "security reasons." After
all, he is no longer too upset with the Bush administration for attempting to force Israeli troops
out of Yasser Arafat's towns. Sharon is instead quite pleased that U.S. officials have now
officially placed the groups that were the main targets of his recent army incursion – known
activists belonging to the Popular Front PLO splinter group, Hamas and the Islamic Jihad group
– on the administration's official terrorist list. He would be happier still if U.S. officials formally
recognized that members of Arafat's own Palestinian Authority have engaged in terror strikes
over the past year, but he knows that would be asking way too much.
Why wait?
If Osama and gang have anything nuclear hidden up their flowing sleeves, why haven't they
revealed this by launching an attack before now? After all, al-Qaida and Taliban forces are being
pummeled by American aircraft in Afghanistan day after day, with no dramatic terrorist response
so far in the West other than possibly a few anthrax spores in some mailed envelopes.
The answer could be that recent U.S. government warnings and stepped up security have
thwarted such an attack, at least for now. Or perhaps the terrorists have been deliberately giving
out false information to wear down weary American security forces and the general public,
waiting for a later day to act when the overall guard has dropped a little bit.
My guess is that the wily bin Laden is not suffering all that badly at present, despite the massive
American bombing campaign. He knows that support for the counter-terrorism war is already
waning in the West, especially in Europe where hand wringing over relatively modest civilian
casualties is reaching fever pitch (when will all realize that this is not a game of virtual war?).
Meanwhile additional jihad warriors are crossing over porous Afghan borders everyday, some
coming from as far away as England and Indonesia.
Without wishing to add to the terrorist problem by further alarming any reader who is already
having trouble sleeping at night, I suggest that the Arabian "Robin Hood" may be waiting to
unleash his nuclear genii until he can achieve the maximum emotional Islamic response to such a
dastardly attack.
As a longtime friend and observer of many Arabs belonging to the growing worldwide
population of Mohammad's faithful followers, I would nominate the holy month of Ramadan as
the ideal time to strike. It is always a period of heightened religious fervor in the Muslim world,
as I have witnessed many times firsthand. This year, Ramadan begins on Nov. 17. Such an
audacious terrorist assault would really get Osama's jihad struggle off the ground – off the
ground of the new Ground Zero.
Special Offer:

Is the world facing all-out war in the Middle East? Get David Dolan's "Israel in Crisis,"
Now available in WorldNetDaily's online store!
If you'd rather order by phone, call WND's toll-free customer service line at 1-800-
4WND-COM (1-800-496-3266).
David Dolan is a Jerusalem-based author and journalist who has lived in Israel since
1980. He reported for CBS Radio for over 12 years.

Read more: Osama's nuclear bombhttp://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?
ARTICLE_ID=25250#ixzz1IO3mvP7W




Hidden Bombs; Avian Flu; Translations
Nuclear Bomb hidden in old warehouse in Los Angeles


MesakeCoalala mesakec@forumsec.org.fj
In the early hours of Sunday morning, 10/9/05 I had this dream.
(Note: For quite a few weeks now I have been praying to the Lord that he visit all my
friends and relatives around the world in dreams, visions and revelations and show
them that the tribulation is about to start and that it was time to repent and turn to the
Lord.)
I dreamt that I was in Los Angeles. I was sitting on a table with an unsaved cousin of
mine. He was telling me how the Lord has been showing him dreams of the
whereabouts of the enemy’s nuclear bombs that have been hidden away in the U.S. He
described to me an old, derelict, rundown warehouse where a nuclear warhead was
hidden. In the dream I was really happy. God was answering my prayers and my
friends and relatives were being warned.
About 12.30AM, Monday morning, 10/10/05 I had this intense dream.
In the dream I saw people panicking and fleeing towards the East Coast of the United
States. I was wondering what the people were fleeing from. Then I heard the words
“Avian Flu” or something that sounded similar but I am sure it was Avian Flu. I saw
soldiers mercilessly shooting people who were slow to flee. As I looked at the soldiers
the word “Nazi” came to my mind. I then saw this Polynesian family who were slow to
flee. The parents had decided since they couldn’t make it they might as well hide under
the the big septic tank beside their home. Little did the family know that a soldier had
spotted them. Somehow I knew what soldier was thinking – he was thinking of blowing
up the whole septic tank along with the family.
As the chaos spread, I started praying and said something like this: “Lord what do you
want me to do?” Immediately, my body had this bright, orange glow. I saw a few other
people who had the same orange glow on them. Like the others I could clearly hear the
voice of the Lord directing me on who to minister to. We were translated from place to
place only at the Lord’s direction. I remember telling a group of people what was
happening and leading them to the Lord. I then was directed to go to someone whose
name was Urn…This Urn had shared a prophecy which I was interested in. I then woke
up at about 1:00 AM thinking it was for real.
http://www.unleavenedbreadministries.org/?page=bombs-flu-translations
FEMA Preparing for Mass Destruction Attacks on Cities
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/7/14/214727.shtml



John O. Edwards
Monday, July 15, 2002
FEMA, the federal agency charged with disaster preparedness, is engaged in a crash effort to
prepare for multiple mass destruction attacks on U.S. cities - including the creation of sprawling
temporary cities to handle millions of displaced persons, NewsMax has learned.
FEMA is readying for nuclear, biological and chemical attacks against U.S. cities, including the
possibility of multiple attacks with mass destruction weapons.
The agency has already notified vendors, contractors and consultants that it needs to be prepared
to handle the logistics of aiding millions of displaced Americans who will flee from urban areas
that may be attacked.
The agency plans to create emergency, makeshift cities that could house hundreds of thousands,
if not millions, of Americans who may have to flee their urban homes if their cities are attacked.
Ominously, FEMA has been given a deadline of having the cities ready to go by January 2003 –
in about six months.
A source familiar with the deadline believes the effort is related to making the U.S. prepared for
counterattacks if the U.S. invades Iraq sometime next year.
FEMA is currently seeking bids from major real estate management firms, and plans to name
three firms in the near future to handle the logistics and planning for these temporary cities.
FEMA officials have told these firms they already have tents and trailers ordered. The tents and
trailers would provide shelter for displaced populations.
The real estate firms are expected to provide engineers and architects to lay the plans for
emergency infrastructure needs, such as sewage and electricity.
Editor's Note: This story first appeared in NewsMax's Insider Report - emailed to subscribers to
NewsMax's news alert service. To sign up for this free service - and receive many stories not
published on NewsMax.com - Click Here.
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
Homeland/Civil Defense



U.S. Vulnerable to Catastrophic Attack, Congress Told
NewsMax.com Wires
Thursday, June 23, 2005
Despite the federal government's expensive efforts to prevent terrorists from smuggling a nuclear
weapon into the U.S., the nation remains extremely vulnerable to a catastrophic attack, experts
have warned a House committee.

Highly enriched uranium, a crucial ingredient in a nuclear device, could be shielded with less
than a quarter-inch of lead, making it "very likely to escape detection by passive radiation
monitors," Benn Tannenbaum, a physicist and senior program associate at the American
Association for the Advancement of Science, testified at the June 21 hearing of the Homeland
Security subcommittee.
Committee members were told that the monitors, now installed at ports and border stations, can't
distinguish between naturally occurring radiation from everyday items like ceramic tile and the
dangerous enriched uranium.
What's more, less than a quarter of the radiation devices needed to check all goods crossing U.S.
borders have been installed, federal officials told the committee.
Bethann Rooney, manager of security for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey,
testified that none of the cargo moving through the largest ship terminal or goods leaving the port
by rail or barge are inspected for radiation.
She added that the facility receives about 150 false alarms a day from its 22 radiation portal
monitors.
Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-N.J.) said he was worried that the high number of false alarms has
prompted some agents to lower the sensitivity of the detectors, making them less effective in
spotting real danger.
The radiation detection systems installed across the U.S. are "quite limited in their capabilities
and, in general, are insufficient to the task," said physicist Richard L. Wagner Jr., chairman of
the Defense Department task force on preventing a clandestine nuclear attack.
Said Rep. Pascrell: "I am not too hopeful about this situation."
In a related development, a survey of experts predicted that the likelihood of an attack with a
weapon of mass destruction somewhere in the world in the next 10 years could be as high as 70
percent.
Most of the 85 experts who took part in the survey – commissioned by U.S. Senate Foreign
Relations Committee Chairman Richard Lugar - believe that one or two new countries will
acquire nuclear weapons in the next five years, and as many as five will get them during the next
decade.
The survey found that the most significant risk of a WWD attack was from a radiological
weapon, a so-called "dirty bomb" that combines radioactive material with a conventional
explosive device.
The next highest risk was an attack with a chemical or biological weapon, with a nuclear attack
less likely, according to the experts, who included retired Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf and former
CIA Director James Woolsey.
The probability of an attack with any form of WMD was estimated at as high as 50 percent over
the next five years, increasing to as high as 70 percent in 10 years.
Editor's note:
 New book offers details of bin Laden's nuclear plans – Click Here Now
 CIA Translation of Secret Chinese Military Manual – Details Here
 Illegal immigration threatens our security and tears at the fiber of America – Click Here!


Former CIA Director: Terrorist Strike Within U.S. Real Threat
Kenneth R. Timmerman
Tuesday, Aug. 7, 2007
Former CIA Director R. James Woolsey tells NewsMax in an exclusive interview that
terrorists could strike the American homeland — possibly with a weapon of mass
destruction — this summer or early fall.
He also warns that if Iran fails to comply with international efforts to stop its nuclear weapons
program, the U.S. will have no other option than to bomb it.
"I think the threat of a serious attack in the next few months is very real," Woolsey said. A
terrorist strike with a dirty bomb or with biological weapons was "a real possibility." [Editor's
Note: Special: 6 Days of Hell - The Coming War With Iran. Click here for more.]
Woolsey's comments echo those of FBI Director Robert Mueller, who told NewsMax in May
that al-Qaida's paramount goal is clear: to detonate a nuclear device that would kill hundreds of
thousands of Americans.
Terrorists Plotting Now
While Woolsey doubted terrorists would be able to acquire a nuclear explosive device, he
warned that terrorists were trying to acquire one, either on the black market from the former
Soviet Union, or from Iran or North Korea.
The former CIA director said he favored "really tough sanctions" on Iran for another few
months, but if that failed to bring Iran's nuclear weapons program to a halt, the United States had
no other choice but to bomb Iran's nuclear sites.
He also blasted those in the State Department who believe we can convince the Iranians through
negotiations to stop their nuclear programs. "I've never thought there's a chance in hell of that,"
he said.
Asked what three things we need to do to make America more safe, Woolsey said that the first
and most important was not to tie the president's hands when it came to intelligence collection.
Efforts by Democrats to require court orders to intercept international communications amounted
to "shooting ourselves in the foot," he added.
More Pressure on Iran
Next, he said the United States absolutely must step up pressure on Iran, by focusing on Iran's
weak economic underbelly and the wellspring of popular discontent with the regime.
In the longer term, Woolsey said it was essentially that the U.S. beef up its military forces and to
prepare Americans psychologically and politically for a long war with radical Islamic terrorists.
"I think this is a long war, and we need to treat it as such, and go on a full war-footing," he said.
Woolsey had plenty more to say on the topic of Iran, wrapping up the interview with a list of
things needed to keep the United States safe.
NewsMax: Everyone now seems to agree that Iran poses a threat to the United States. But
opinions differ on what to do about it. Where do you stand in the Iran policy debate in
Washington?
Woolsey: I'm still in the camp, but probably only for a few more months, of those who want to
try really tough sanctions. And I mean, doing everything we did to the Soviets in the Cold War,
everything anybody could think of to undermine their economic system.
Beginning right now, we need to work with those countries that sell refined oil products to them,
such as gasoline and diesel, of which they import about 40 percent, to figure out how to get those
stopped.
We need broadcasting into Iran in the fashion we used to do on Radio Free Europe during the
Cold War into Eastern Europe. I testified about these things last time nearly two years ago to a
Senate committee, saying it was getting late. So I don't know if sanctions can work. But I believe
there is a chance that really blocking their imports of gasoline and refined diesel would work, by
bringing a lot of dissention from minority groups which are nearly half of the country, and from
regular citizens, as happened a few weeks ago with Ahmadinejad's gas rationing and increase in
gas prices.
So I would still like to see us try that not half-heartedly but vigorously, and not be deterred at all
by the threats and the other steps that they will take.
Remember, the Persians invented chess. They're good at it.
Their most valuable piece, their "queen" really, is their nuclear weapons program. Syria rises to
the level of a rook, since that's a government. Hamas, Moqtada al-Sadr, Hezbollah, they're all
pawns.
Whether it was the war with Israel or what, they move their subordinate pieces around in such a
way as to protect their queen. Once they have a nuclear weapon, the world changes in some
extraordinarily unpleasant ways.
So I believe that for a short time — I don't know if its four to five months, or a year, but it's
surely not much longer than that — we can still try tough sanctions, and all the other steps — the
right kind of broadcasting, and all the rest. And if that doesn't work, then we're in a situation
where we have a choice of letting Iran have a nuclear weapon, or using force. And at that point,
with great reluctance, just as I think he was reluctant to advocate it but has done so, I agree with
John McCain.
Force is the worst option except for one. And that is allowing Iran to have a nuclear weapon.
NewsMax: The State Department seems to want to negotiate with Iran over Iran's support
for Iraqi insurgents. Is this wise?
Woolsey: I rarely flat oppose talking to adversaries, but the time you want to do it is when you
have an edge over them, not they have an edge over you.
I think that in spite of some recent military successes, the situation in Iraq is particularly difficult
with the Maliki government, and with Moqtada Sadr on the whole relatively unconstrained, that
they are relatively speaking in a stronger position than I would like to see for us to take any
initiative in negotiations.
It might have been different right after Baghdad fell, when clearly they were very worried. That
would have been a good time, if one felt there was advantage to negotiations, to talk to them. But
I am not confidant that we're not going to have any positive effect from these negotiations.
NewsMax: Should the U.S. have seized what is being touted as an Iranian initiative in April
2003?
Woolsey: I don't know how much of an initiative of theirs it was. I've heard stories about it. All
I'm saying is that if you're going to negotiate with an adversary, the time to do it is when they are
the demandeur, when they are feeling weak and you have just demonstrated strength. And April-
May 2003 was such a time.
NewsMax: Do you see any signs that the administration is preparing to take military action
against Iran?
Woolsey: I don't know and I wouldn't necessarily know. If one was going to use air power
exclusively, which I think would be likely and appropriate, it would not necessarily be something
that would take a huge amount of lead time. Probably two or three weeks, not two or three
months.
NewsMax: Some Navy people have suggested to me that we would get our carriers out of
the Gulf first.
Woolsey: That would be a possibility, because it's a constrained sea, and they have lots of small
boats that could be used to attack with cruise missiles on them, and they have cruise missiles
with a range to potentially be effective against U.S. naval forces in the Gulf, whereas the open
ocean — the blue ocean — is our "Briar Patch," as in the Uncle Remus story.
That's where we're at home and where we want to be. Certainly our carrier aircraft have the
range along with B-52s and B-1s and B-2s to reach targets in Iran even if they're operating from
the open ocean as distinct from the Gulf.
So I'm leaving it up to the admirals and the secretary of defense where and when to put carriers.
But my instinct would be that one would be better off in the open ocean with several carriers
rather than have some stay in the Gulf. But there are weapons systems and tactics I may not be
aware of.
NewsMax: Do you see any signs that the Iranians are preparing to take military action
against us? And how seriously should we take their threats?
Woolsey: I think you want to listen particularly to what they say to one another. So their threats
of destroying Israel, if they can, are as real as "Mein Kampf." Their potential to unleash
Hezbollah, which is the world's most professional terrorist organization, much more capable
really than al-Qaida or others, could conceivably do a lot of damage in the U.S. as well as
various places abroad, including Iraq.
I don't think that's something that should deter us if we have to take action to deter them from
potentially having a nuclear weapon.
NewsMax: The director of national Intelligence, Adm. McConnell, FBI Director Mueller,
and the president have all warned that the terrorists want to strike us again here at home.
How real is the threat of a WMD attack — possibly a nuclear attack — on the American
homeland by terrorists?
Woolsey: Well, I think the threat of a serious attack in the next few months is very real. It's what
Mike McConnell and Mueller have said, and what Chertoff said about his gut feeling.
A lot of people made fun of that, but I think that was a senior government official trying to
communicate something without saying here's my evidence, because if he says that, he might
have blown the source or method of intelligence. So I think various things that he and
McConnell and Mueller and others have been saying all suggest that there's a real possibility —
now I don't know which particular terrorist group — of something happening and possibly
something very bad, late this summer or this fall.
I think that unless al-Qaida or the Iranians have been able to obtain a loose old Soviet nuke, it's
unlikely it could be a nuclear detonation. It might be possible they could get hold of other
nuclear material, like cesium or strontium, which is much easier to get hold of, and have
something like a dirty bomb. And certainly biological material, like anthrax, is much easier to
produce and get hold of than fissionable material.
And we don't know what the North Koreans might be willing to sell to Iran. They have
essentially a joint ballistic missile development program; the Shahab and the Taepo Doing/No
Dong are essentially the same missile, certainly with the same ranges.
North Korea has several bombs worth of plutonium, but plutonium bombs are harder to construct
than simple highly-enriched uranium bombs. We believe that it's possible that North Koreans
had a HEU program, and at one point they seemed to admit it. But I don't know of any estimates
of what they have or what they had.
So if one's trying to think of a source of a bomb that terrorists, whether al-Qaida or Hezbollah,
might be trying to get their hands on today, a nuclear weapon might be extremely difficult,
unless they've been able to buy or otherwise obtain one of the old Soviet suitcase nuclear
weapons.
NewsMax: Do you think those are real?
Woolsey: Certainly the Soviets had atomic demolition munitions that were relatively small —
ours were smaller, I think. But each of us had ADMS that could easily be carried by one man.
That was also true of some of the smaller nuclear artillery shells that existed. So it's not
impossible that a terrorist group could try to get hold of a former Soviet relatively small nuclear
warhead.
NewsMax: Why do you think we've not been helping the pro-democracy groups inside
Iran?
Woolsey: I don't know. It's one of the things that we advocated in the committee on the present
danger a couple of years ago, that I advocated to the Senate Homeland Security Committee
nearly two years ago. I suppose it's because there are disagreements inside the U.S. government.
Some people believe we can talk the Iranians out of their nuclear program. I've never thought
there's a chance in hell of that.
NewsMax: What are the three things we need to do to make America more safe?
Woolsey: Well, the thing that we can do in the short order that is most important is not to cut
back on our intelligence capabilities, whether it's through restricting the president's ability to
intercept communications or otherwise. We know how to do that reasonably well and don't want
to shoot ourselves in the foot by cutting back on it.
The second thing are the steps we talked about with Iran, from broadcasting to cutting off their
imports of gasoline and diesel and all the other financial and economic steps. Those would be the
two in the really short order that would be on top of my list.
Further down the line, I think we need a substantial increase in our military forces, in our overall
national stance of going on a war-footing. I don't think this is just a law enforcement matter.
I think this is a long war, and we need to treat it as such; and go on a full war-footing, from
everything to making it easy for John Does to give alerts when they see the flying imams doing
their thing, to working closely with allies in the Middle East, I think particularly with Israel. And
a wide range of similar steps.
Editor's note:
 Can America avoid a nuclear ‘D-Day'? Get the INSIDE story – Click Here Now.
 Iran's Clerics Plan a Nuclear Showdown with the U.S. – Click Here!
 Homeland Security alert: You must have emergency radio
 Make your fortune in Sectors – avoid the S&P! Click Here Now
 Protect Your Brain from Alzheimer's, Parkinson's
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
Homeland/Civil Defense
Iran Nuclear Push
WMD
War on Terrorism



Al-Qaida Plans Nuclear Attacks on 7 U.S. Cities
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/5/30/222555.shtml


NewsMax.com Wires
Thursday, May 31, 2007
The newly released book "The Day of Islam: The Annihilation of America and the Western
World," (Prometheus Books) paints a frightening picture of al-Qaida's nuclear ambitions — one
every American must read.
Seasoned investigative reporter and former FBI consultant Paul Williams reveals the alarming
potential for nuclear terrorism on U.S. soil and the sinister connections among organized crime,
illegal immigrants, and al-Qaida. [Editor's Note: Get Paul Williams' explosive "The Day of
Islam" FREE — Click Here Now.]
Recently, FBI Director Robert Mueller, in an interview with NewsMax, confirmed Williams'
main claim. Mueller said al-Qaida's paramount goal is clear: to detonate a nuclear device that
would kill hundreds of thousands of Americans.
Mueller told NewsMax that at times, the threat feels so real he lies awake at night thinking about
the prospect.
Williams maintains that al-Qaida is not content on blowing up one nuclear device or even simply
a "dirty" nuke — but wants to explode real nuclear devices in seven U.S. cities simultaneously.
Williams says these cities are New York, Washington, D.C., Las Vegas, Miami, Boston,
Houston, and Los Angeles.
Mueller seems to confirm this claim of multiple attacks, saying both New York and Washington
would be likely targets. Already Williams says the U.S. government has Washington webbed by
"choke" points to detect nuclear material.
For many Americans the threat of al-Qaida's nuclear ambitions begins in the time after the
horrific 9/11 attacks.
But as Williams shows so clearly, al-Qaida has been devising its nuclear plan since the early
1990s — and the U.S. government and other intelligence services have been well aware of al-
Qaida's plan.
For example, Williams quotes Michael Scheuer, a senior CIA official who headed the agency's
bin Laden unit.
Scheuer admitted the CIA "found that [bin Laden] and al-Qaida were involved in an
extraordinarily sophisticated and professional effort to acquire weapons of mass destruction — in
this case, nuclear weapons; so, by the end of 1996, it was clear that this was an organization
unlike any other one we had ever seen."
Remember, Scheuer is describing the period before 9/11, proving again that bin Laden had been
investing enormous time, resources, and money into getting nuclear weapons for more than 10
years.
Bin Laden and his adherents believe this nuclear cataclysm will usher in "The Day of Islam," the
dream of radical Muslims to see all of humankind fall in submission before the throne of Allah
as the "Great Satan," America, is brought to her knees.
Williams is not surprised at all that bin Laden has planned to launch such nuclear attacks,
suggesting his delay is consistent with his past pattern of activities. For sure, it is a plan that has
been long in its hatching.
Based on the "forgotten testimony" of the FBI's "Confidential Source One," as well as other
sources, Williams first presents evidence of bin Laden's purchase of highly enriched uranium in
Sudan and nuclear devices from the Chechens and the Russian Mafia.
He then offers further information on the workings of Pakistani scientists and technicians from
the A.Q. Khan Research Facility to maintain and upgrade al-Qaida's "bespoke nukes" (with
explosive yields in excess of 10 kilotons) for the "American Hiroshima."
Williams explosive revelations are even more worrisome because they are not simply backed up
by speculation and anonymous sources, they are sourced with government reports and comments
made "on the record" by top officials.
Among the explosive revelations in "The Day of Islam":
    •   In 1996, al-Qaida's "paymaster" and a top lieutenant for bin Laden walked into a U.S.
        embassy in Africa and spilled the beans on the terror group's activities — including that
        al-Qaida had purchased nuclear material in the Sudan
    •   The incredible story of a Brooklyn, N.Y., mosque that was receiving "stipends" from
        Uncle Sam for more than $2 million a year up until 1993 — when it was discovered the
        mosque was the nerve center for the first attack on the World Trade Center
    •   The fact that despite the hoopla about the war on terror, only one member of bin Laden's
        shura — or high command — has been killed
    •   The case of a Chicago charity that raised millions for bin Laden and even paid for one of
        his operatives whose sole job was to acquire nuclear weapons
   •   Evidence the Saudi intelligence service claims bin Laden has an arsenal of between 40
       and 70 tactical nuclear weapons
   •   Russian sources that claim bin Laden bought 12 to 15 fully assembled nuclear weapons
   •   Ties between al-Qaida and the Chechen rebels who allegedly acquired nuclear suitcase
       devices
   •   Bin Laden's claim to a Pakistani journalist two months before 9/11 that acquiring nuclear
       was "not difficult" — claiming they were available from Russia for between $10 million
       and $20 million
   •   Author Tom Clancy's revelations he was "first bemused, then stunned" to find how easy
       it is for a wealthy person to develop a nuclear device equal to that dropped on Hiroshima
       and Nagasaki
   •   How atomic blueprints are available from Amazon.com!
   •   Evidence bin Laden spent between $60 and $100 million to build nuclear devices with
       the help of scientists from Pakistan, Russia, and China
   •   The damage even a low yield "junk" nuclear device would do to New York — with an
       estimated 250,000 dead in several days
   •   The remarkable story of two British secret agents who penetrated al-Qaida's camps in
       Afghanistan — and reported to Britain that the terror group was finishing work on
       radiological weapons
   •   The stunning admission of the head of Britain's MI5 who confirmed that "renegade"
       scientists had provided al-Qaida with the knowledge they needed to build a nuclear
       device
   •   New Jersey: the strange case of a Pakistani who died of radiological poisoning soon after
       9/11, a man who had apparently served as a "mule" to transport the deadly material into
       the U.S.
   •   Axis of Evil: the secret alliance between al-Qaida and Iran that brings together two
       religious groups with one common goal: destroying the U.S.
   •   And much, much more
[Editor's Note: Get Paul Williams' explosive new book "The Day of Islam" FREE — Click
Here Now.]
In "The Day of Islam," Williams takes you on a virtual tour of al-Qaida and its global
operations.
You will discover their operations not only cross through Pakistan, Iran, Iraq, and other Muslim
countries — but through Latin America, Mexico, and even our neighbor Canada!
What emerges is a harrowing picture of international terrorist activities, all aimed at the
destruction of the United States and the collapse of the Western world.
Williams also reveals the man who has been tapped by bin Laden to lead the "Day of Islam"
attack in the U.S. — a man who served as the "fixer" of 9/11 and yet has never been caught. He
is believed to be here in the United States.
This dangerous man has wormed his way into American culture: He speaks perfect English and
passes himself off as an Italian American. He is "the most dangerous man in the world."
FBI Director Mueller has called this man "the next Mohamed Atta" — but most Americans have
never heard of him or seen his image. Williams expresses dismay that the FBI, well aware of this
terrorist's threat, has not fully alerted the American public.
Indeed, al-Qaida reportedly had 42 operatives as part of its 9/11 attacks, and some 23 remain as
"sleepers" in the United States.
Williams also reveals that al-Qaida's operations continue here in the United States, supported by
supplies and personnel who simply slip through Mexico and across our porous border.
Williams names names — including top al-Qaida operatives that have admitted that Mexico
remains the main conduit point for al-Qaida penetration into the United States. This includes the
smuggling of nuclear materials.
"The Day of Islam" also offers a full translation of the "fatwa" — the religious order bin laden
received in 2003 which "grants al-Qaida permission to kill 10 million Americans by way of
nuclear weapons."
For those who think that al-Qaida has been disabled, dismembered, or neutralized, the "Day of
Islam" will provide a wake up call like never before.
Editor's note: Get Paul William's explosive new book "The Day of Islam" FREE — Click
Here Now.
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
Al-Qaeda

          A Nuclear 9/11. It Could Happen.
http://w3.newsmax.com/a/may10/

       Al-Qaida is racing to acquire a nuclear device.
        They want to detonate it in an American city.
    A Newsmax report goes inside the effort to stop them.

A Hiroshima-sized nuclear device smuggled into the U.S. inside a cargo container detonates in
California's Port of Long Beach, killing 60,000 people instantaneously, exposing another
150,000 to deadly radiation, touching off massive fires and forcing the evacuation of 6 million
panicked people in the Los Angeles basin.
Could it happen?
Top experts say it not only could happen, it is "more likely than not" to occur within the next
several years.
Last month the Obama administration admitted that al-Qaida is frantically trying to acquire a
nuclear device.
Now Newsmax magazine talks to some of the top experts in the U.S., including interviews with
former CIA Director Gen. Michael Hayden and current FBI Director Robert Mueller.
In Newsmax magazine's special report, "Nuclear D-Day," we take an in-depth look at the
frightening and ever-growing threat of a nuclear attack orchestrated by terrorists or a rogue state
like Iran.
The report was written by New York Times best-selling author and Newsmax Contributing Editor
Kenneth R. Timmerman, who was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2006 for his work
exposing Iran's nuclear program.
He warns that a nuclear strike against a high-profile American target remains the No. 1 goal of
Islamic terrorists. And when they do strike, the experts say, America almost certainly will be
grossly unprepared to handle it.
You can also check out our FREE offer — the Emergency Radio — a $30 value and
something every home must have. Go Here Now.
This exclusive Newsmax report explores:
   •   The CIA's startling assessment about al-Qaida's nuclear plan
   •   Financial markets and more — the grave repercussions of a nuclear blast
   •   Bin Laden's "religious duty" to obtain a nuclear weapon
   •   Does Iran already have the bomb?
   •   Three broad ways terrorists can obtain a nuke
   •   Obama's "woeful" preparations for biothreats
   •   Iran's ominous ties with Chavez's Venezuela
   •   North Korea's growing nuclear capabilities
   •   A frightening number: 1,562 "confirmed incidents" of nuclear materials smuggling
   •   The "dirty bomb" threat against American cities
   •   Former CIA chief Michael Hayden's warning about al-Qaida and WMDs
   •   Fugitive Adnan Shukrijumah: "the next Mohamed Atta"
   •   Chilling claim: al-Qaida bought three suitcase bombs
   •   How Iran could conceal a nuclear test
   •   Why Obama's nuclear security summit was misguided
   •   Al-Qaida's attempt to bomb France
   •   The federal response plan that's called "a joke"
   •   Cheney: Interrogations prevented attacks after 9/11
   •   The Nuclear Security Administration's impressive efforts overseas
   •   How terrorists could build a bomb in the U.S. "from scratch"
   •   Bipartisan commission: WMD attack by terrorists by 2013
   •   Three rules for surviving after a nuclear blast
   •   And more
Find out how you can get this report FREE — PLUS get an Emergency Radio worth
almost $30 with our FREE offer. Go Here Now.



China Is a Threat to America
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/3/14/133903.shtml


Charles R. Smith
Thursday, March 14, 2002
Chinese Weapons Development and Sales Are Directed Against the U.S.
China is angry at the United States. The communist Chinese government unsuccessfully pressed
the Bush administration to deny permission for Taiwan's defense minister, Tang Yiau-ming, to
attend an arms conference in Florida.
On Monday, Tang met with U.S. Deputy Undersecretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz while
visiting the U.S. defense industry conference. As a result of that meeting, the communist Chinese
are furious.
"We express our strong dissatisfaction and indignation," stated Chinese Foreign Ministry
spokesman Sun Yuxi.
"We believe it will not only foster the arrogance of Taiwan independence forces, it will also
damage Chinese-American relations and cross-strait ties," said Sun.
Communist spokesman Sun also noted that China was "deeply shocked" by a recently
declassified report that named China as one of six possible nations that could face nuclear strikes
from America. Sun stated that China was seeking an "official" explanation of the report from
Washington. Sun emphasized that China is a peace-loving nation.
The U.S.-Chinese 'Bilateral Military Relationship'
Many in the U.S. press, academia and political structure characterize China as our "strategic
partner," a nation with similar goals and views as the United States. The U.S. policy of
appeasement, that China is a peaceful giant, was documented in the official correspondence of
Clinton Defense Secretary William Perry.
In a 1995 letter to Chinese General Ding Henggao, U.S. Secretary of Defense Perry wrote that
"advancing the military relationship between our two nations remains an objective which we
agree serves the long-term interests of peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific Region."
Perry wrote quite clearly that the Clinton administration wanted close ties to Beijing by
"reiterating my support for our bilateral military relationship."
Less than six months after Perry's offer for a "bilateral military relationship," the People's
Liberation Army launched a simulated nuclear attack against the two largest cities in Taiwan. In
1996, the PLA Second Artillery Corps fired dummy missile warheads only a few miles off the
Taiwanese coast.
The 1996 missile crisis nearly started World War III. The Clinton administration had to respond
to Beijing's threat to start a nuclear war in the Straits of Taiwan. Clinton's reaction was to send in
the U.S. Navy and our aircraft carriers.
Chinese Plans for Nuclear War With the U.S.
The Chinese military took quick notice of the U.S. carriers, and in 1999 the communist army
Office of the Central Military Command wrote a report on future nuclear combat with the United
States.
"China is not only a big country, but also possesses a nuclear arsenal that has long since been
incorporated into the state warfare system and played a real role in our national defense," states
the Chinese military commission report.
"During last crisis across the Taiwan Straits, the U.S. tried to blackmail us with their aircraft
carrier(s), but when their spy satellites confirmed that our four nuclear submarines which used to
be stationed at Lushun Harbor had disappeared, those politicians addicted to the Taiwan card
could not imagine how worried their military commanders were," notes the Chinese army report.
"In comparison with the U.S. nuclear arsenal, our disadvantage is mainly numeric, while in real
wars the qualitative gap will be reflected only as different requirements of strategic theory. In
terms of deterrence, there is not any difference in practical value. So far we have built up the
capability for the second and the third nuclear strikes and are fairly confident in fighting a
nuclear war. The PCC has decided to pass through formal channels this message to the top
leaders of the U.S. This is one of the concrete measures that we will take to prevent the
escalation of war in the spirit of being responsible."
Chinese General Wants to Nuke L.A.
There is little question that China is "responsible" when it comes to nuclear war. Since 1996, the
Chinese army has not stopped its acts of atomic-tipped aggression and intimidation. For
example, two years after firing missiles at Taiwan, Gen. Xiong, then second in command of the
People's Liberation Army, threatened to vaporize Los Angeles.
Not once during the entire 40-year Cold War between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. did any Soviet
general threaten to vaporize an American city. It is certain that the Kremlin would have fired any
officer who made such a statement, because of the threat to global peace.
In contrast, Gen. Xiong remains second in command of the People's Liberation Army, ready to
hurl his nuclear forces into battle with America on a moment's notice.
According to the CIA, China is expected to continue its rapid deployment of ballistic missiles
along the Chinese mainland, within striking distance of Taiwan.
China's short-range ballistic missile arsenal could reach "several hundred" by the year 2005,
stated Robert Walpole, a national intelligence officer, during a Senate hearing on international
security.
The CIA intelligence analyst also revealed that Beijing is working on three new intercontinental
ballistic missiles, the Dong-Feng 31, a longer-range variant of the Dong-Feng 31, and the
submarine-launched JL-2. The DF-31 and JL-2 both have an estimated range of over 7,000 miles
and can shower the U.S. West Coast with nuclear warheads.
Chinese Nuclear Weapons Proliferation
In addition, the leaders in Beijing have taken every opportunity to export missile and nuclear
warfare equipment to such nations as Iran, Pakistan and Iraq. The entire Pakistani atomic arsenal
was built from scratch with the direct assistance of the Chinese military, including advanced
nuclear warhead designs from PLA labs and nuclear-tipped missiles directly out of the Chinese
army inventory.
The "National Intelligence Estimate," a threat analysis published by the CIA, noted that Beijing
has "enabled emerging missile states to accelerate development timelines for their existing
programs" and sold "turnkey systems to gain previously non-existent capabilities – in the case of
the Chinese sale of the M-11 short-range ballistic missile to Pakistan."
In 2001, the U.S. lodged sanctions against the China Metallurgical Equipment Corp. after it
continued to ship missile parts to Pakistan, violating Beijing's sixth promise to stop such exports.
It should surprise no one that the People's Liberation Army owns China Metallurgical.
During the 1990s, the Chinese army also exported an advanced air defense network to Iraq
through another front company, in direct violation of the U.N. ban on military sales to Baghdad.
The Bush administration openly complained about Chinese military sales to Iraq and eventually
bombed several sites occupied by Chinese military engineers working for Saddam Hussein.
"We raised earlier in the administration concerns about what might be going on with Iraq," stated
Bush national security adviser Condoleezza Rice on Chinese missile proliferation.
However, the Chinese army sales to Iraq have not stopped. PLA front companies continue to
provide camouflage for Beijing as it attempts to export more advanced weapons to Iraq.
For example, the harmless-sounding Shandong Arts and Craft Company is in fact a front for
Chinese missile proliferation. In 2001, the firm acted as a cover for a PLA military delegation to
Iraq seeking to sell advanced long-range missile technology to Saddam Hussein.
China Is a Threat
The China apologists in the United States assure us that the communist state is not a threat, that it
is a peaceful nation prepared to take its place in the world. Their simplistic view of Chinese
history omits the past 40 years of confrontation with America.
They refuse to see Beijing's growing inventory of advanced missiles, warships and planes. They
ignore years of espionage and covert political influence through contributions to U.S. political
campaigns. They continue to seek appeasement despite the overwhelming evidence of missile
and nuclear weapon proliferation.
In the next 40 years, China will attempt to take its place among the world's superpowers. China's
growing arsenal of advanced weapons will enable it to do so in a forceful and violent manner. It
is time that we recognized what the People's Liberation Army already knows – that America is
its No. 1 target.
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
China/Taiwan
Clinton Scandals
Saddam Hussein/Iraq
A product that might interest you:
Find out the complete details of China's Military Buildup in "Bitter Legacy: NewsMax Reveals
the Untold Story of the Clinton-Gore Years"




      Ex-spy Fears Sneak Russian Attack
      http://archive.newsmax.com/articles/?a=2000/1/25/70247



               NewsMax.com
               January 25, 2000
By Stephan Archer
LOS ANGELES – StanislavLunev, the highest-ranking Soviet spy ever
to defect, warned members of Congress Monday a pre-emptive nuclear
strike by Russia on American soil is a real possibility.
At a House Committee on Government Reform hearing here, the one-
time colonel in Soviet and then Russian Federation military
intelligence, gave a chilling presentation of his country’s Cold War
plans to defeat the United States.
Under federal witness protection, Lunev was escorted into the hearing
room with a black bag covering his head.
From behind a screen to shield him from the view of the audience,
Lunev testified Soviet generals had designed a special plan for the
future war against America and its allies in which special-operation
forces commanders would come to the United States and other NATO
countries a few days – maybe even a few hours – before actual war.
Using weapons systems that had already been hidden at strategic points
throughout the United States, he said, the Soviet generals would have
demolished the country’s political infrastructure by destroying strategic
facilities and assassinating top military leaders such as the president
and vice president just hours or minutes before a nuclear missile strike.
Lunev said one of his espionage assignments had been to scout "drop
sites" for weapons caches.
He said he believes Russian military weapons are currently hidden in
strategic points all across the United States and Europe for just such a
purpose.
Those hidden stockpiles of weapons would include portable nuclear
devices, chemical and biological weapons, conventional weapons and
incendiary devices, he said.
Lunev told the panel the weapon caches could be used whenever the
Russian commanders in charge are given the "go."
He added that Russia is using Chechnya as a test battlefield for a future
"real" war that may be with the United States and its allies.
"Of course, you understand that this is history," Lunev told the
congressional panel after describing the Soviet plan.
"I need to tell you that history's history, but unfortunately, the current
situation is not very good.
"These military plans are still consistent with Russian generals, and
these military plans in time of possible war would be fulfilled by
special-operations forces commanders."
Also present at the hearing was Rep. Dan Burton, R-Ind., chairman of
the House Committee on Government Reform; Rep. Tom Campbell, R-
Calif.; Curt Weldon, R-Pa.; Joe Scarborough, R-Fla.; Dr. William
Green, political science professor for the national security studies
program at California State University, San Bernardino; and former
Central Intelligence Agency officer Peter Pry.
Burton said, "Some members of the media are indicating we might be
trying to create paranoia and a new Cold War. That's untrue.
"I'm distressed that some members of the media think we're trying to
scare everyone to death."
Asked by reporters why he chose California for this hearing, Burton
said, "It's my understanding that there are many potential targets for
Russian sabotage in California.
"California is the most populous state in the nation. If there are hidden
caches of explosives in this state, that's very dangerous. That's why
we're here."
Campbell, who represents a district in this state, said, "There is a high
likelihood of positioning weapons in California."
Concerning the possibility of a first strike by Russian forces against the
United States, Pry, formerly with the CIA, said the opportunity had
presented itself numerous times during the 1980s and 1990s.
For example, in 1995, he said, the West and Russia experienced a
missile crisis "more dangerous than the 1962 Cuban missile crisis."
Pry said that in January 1995, NASA and Norway, in a joint project,
launched a meteorological rocket to study the aurora borealis, but the
Russian Foreign Ministry never received notice of the launch due to a
clerical error by an inexperienced staffer.
As a result, Pry said, Russia almost launched its nuclear missiles aimed
at the United States.
Only then-President Boris Yeltsin, not believing the West would attack,
held off the launch and waited to find out if the missile did, in fact, veer
off course over the Russian mainland, Pry said.
"Despite administration claims that our Russian policy is a success,
many of us have watched and worried and warned for years that the
Russian policy has careened toward failure," he said.
"The administration's Russian policy has been more of a public-
relations campaign to persuade the American people all is well rather
than a hardheaded, bulleted program to really advance free enterprise
and democracy in Russia and to protect U.S. vital national interests."
Weldon said the Clinton administration has had a consistent pattern of
not wanting anything to surface that might give the perception of a
potential or real problem in the relationship between the United States
and Russia, including the theft of International Monetary Fund dollars,
abuse in insider trading in Russia and arms-control treaty violations.
Although many questions regarding U.S. foreign policy with Russia are
aimed at the Clinton administration, Weldon said, the hearing was not a
"Republican witch-hunt."
Burton observed that Rep. Henry Waxman, a Democratic member of
the committee who represents a Los Angeles district and is a staunch
defender of the Clinton administration, chose not come to the hearing.
"I really regret the State Department isn't here today," Burton said.
"They just jumped through hoops not to testify."
Weldon said that in November of last year he introduced House
Resolution 380, expressing concern over the location and removal of
weapon caches placed in the United States by the Russian or Soviet
governments.
Sixteen Republicans and 16 Democrats signed the resolution. Even so,
the administration has not asked the Russians for the specific location
of the weapon stashes in the United States.
Do these stashes pose a threat to Americans domestically?
Campbell, speaking for his constituents in California, seems to think so.
He said although he doesn’t think the United States should back Russia
into a corner, he believes the administration should ask Russia the
tougher questions concerning the whereabouts of the weapon stashes.
"I am a representative," said Campbell. "I am owed an answer."
It has not been easy for Campbell to get one. On Dec. 6 of last year,
Campbell wrote a letter requesting information about the location of
Russian weapon caches in the United States to Clinton’s National
Security Adviser Sandy Berger, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright
and Defense Secretary William Cohen. Only Cohen responded to
Campbell’s letter, on Dec. 16.
In the letter Cohen said, "Thank you for your letter requesting
information about the location of Russian weapon caches within the
United States. I have asked the undersecretary of defense for policy,
Mr. Walt Slocombe, to promptly address this request and he will get
back to you as soon as possible."
Campbell, upset by the brief response he received from Cohen, told
NewsMax.com when push comes to shove a subpoena might be
needed, but it was wise to try other means first.



A Native Chinese on the China Dictators' World Conquest
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/1/19/90429.
shtml

Lev Navrozov
Friday, Jan. 19, 2007
His name is Zhang Hongbao, and the Chinese dictatorship declared him to be a
criminal, but he managed to escape from China to the United States, where he
was recently "killed in a car accident."
In 2005, "World Chinese Net" posted his essay: "The Chinese Communist
Party's Post-Nuclear Super Weapons and Its Strategic Goal."
Now, the CIA and other Western intelligence/espionage organizations are
assumed to have been penetrating the dictatorship of China and studying this
subject, along with Western professors of Sinology. And here I draw attention to
a native Chinese. Yes, a native Chinese, without any degree or post, may know
what the Western intelligence/espionage and academic sinology do not.
When I, a native Russian, emigrated with my family to the United States in the
early 1970s, I told The New York Times and the CIA that the Soviet dictatorship
had been developing post-nuclear super weapons, which neither The New York
Times nor the CIA would believe to be true for the next 20 years until Yeltsin,
who needed peace for his reforms, did not exhibit in 1992 for international
inspection the pre-1992 Soviet development of such super weapons.
How could I know what the CIA and The New York Times refused to know for
another 20 years?
I was a native Russian, not a foreigner (such as a Western spy) in Russia to be
kept off anything connected with Soviet military secrets. My wife was also a
native Russian, and she became without any difficulty the editor of the Soviet
edition of the international magazine "Nuclear Physics," under the auspices of
the most important Soviet nuclear research institute, headed by Skobeltsin, the
founder of Soviet nuclear physics, and staffed by internationally known Soviet
nuclear physicists.
As my wife told me, Skobeltsin had announced at a general meeting of his
subordinates that his institute was to discontinue its nuclear research and to
launch, instead, laser research, for example.
It was obvious to me what was unknown to the CIA and The New York Times
until 1992: the Soviet nuclear research had been succeeded by the development
of post-nuclear super weapons.
There is no need for a native to penetrate his or her country.
He or she is part of it. Zhang Hongbao begins his essay with five major military
technologies, and ironically, first comes laser technology, which the founder of
Soviet nuclear physics mentioned as a field of research to succeed the nuclear
weapons research in Soviet Russia.
Zhang's next question (Page 3) is to be expected: "Who is really in control of
China today?"
Not a single leader or an emperor, but a "leaders group," a highly complex
combination of power-holders. They threaten each other's power, but the
cumulative power of them all is threatened by what Zhang calls a "full scale
crisis." Politically, China "has a nascent human rights movement"; the influence
of the democratic West and hence democratic demands "are stronger and more
forceful than ever"; "religious forces are responding to the overseas religions of
influence"; "unemployment is high"; "there is a large and impoverished peasant
class"; "official greed and corruption are rampant"; "Taiwan, Xinjiang and Tibet
are pushing for independence and they activate the underground forces."
Every issue is like a sizzling blasting fuse on top of a mount of dry wood.
The English translation of the old Chinese name of China, translated into
English as "the Middle Kingdom," is more adequately translated by Zhang as
"the Centre of the World." The only way out: back to the Center of the World!
"This process is the process of conquering the United States and taking over the
world."
The job must be done by post-nuclear super weapons that have the following
features:
1. One hit destroys the enemy beyond any possibility of enemy resistance
2. Maximum scale and speed of destruction
3. Destruction is traceless. Before the enemy learns about it, the enemy is dead
4. The goal is to wipe out the 2.6 billion inhabitants of the United States and 53
friendly and allied countries
Is the above scenario realistic?
Yes!
As big as the elephant is it can be destroyed by a rat. For example, "if the power
supply for the United States and its friendly and allied countries is suspended for
one or two months (a power outage), the basic population of the United States
and those countries (2.6 billion people) will be eliminated."
The 21-page essay in 8-point type is signed:
Zhang Hongbao Leisurely wrote in Los Angeles February 16th, 2005
Then follows a list of ranks of foreign top government the officials to whom
Zhang Hongbao essay was to be delivered, and a list of the countries to which it
was to be delivered.
Still, Zhang Hongbao's essay of 2005 has been so far ignored.
Finally, the telephone, fax, and e-mail of the sender: Department of National
Military Strategic Research, China Shadow Government.
                                           ***
You can e-mail me at navlev@cloud9.net.
Editor's note:
 Can America avoid a nuclear ‘D-Day'? Get the INSIDE story – Click Here
Now.


Are We Safe From Nuclear Attack?
http://archive.newsmax.com/adv/dec05/


Could terrorists smuggle a nuclear bomb through a U.S. port and explode it on
American soil? Now that North Korea has nuclear devices — could they or terrorists
they work with attack a major U.S. city?
These and other questions are answered in a recent NewsMax Magazine special
report "Avoiding Nuclear D-Day."
This NewsMax report, authored by best-selling author Kenneth R. Timmerman, finds
the threat is real -- and reveals what the U.S. government had done to stop such an
attack.
The NewsMax report reveals how high-tech gear and vigilance are protecting
Americans from terrorist nuclear threats.
This NewsMax report takes an in-depth look at how security measures in the U.S. have
been completely overhauled since 9/11.
You can get this report with our FREE offer and a $35 fleece jacket by Going Here.
This blockbuster NewsMax report explores:
    •   True story: a chilling intel alert set off a frantic search for a nuclear warhead
        smuggled into the U.S.
    •   The inside facts about al-Qaida's attempts to acquire a "dirty bomb" that would
        unleash deadly radiation.
    •   Why a nuclear detonation in New York City is "everyone's worst nightmare."
    •   How the U.S. reacted when an intel report suggested New York was about to
        be hit with a nuclear device.
    •   How a powerful gamma-ray device can scan cargo cartons - without opening
        them.
    •   Why President Bush chose Michael Chertoff as the new Homeland Security
        Secretary.
    •   The "rogues gallery" of potential nuclear players - more than just bin Laden
        threaten our cities.
    •   Terrorists' potential points of entry: 3,700 terminals, 301 ports.
    •   The "suitcase nuke" - real or hoax?
           •   How 2002's Container Security Initiative is "pushing the borders outward."
           •   The new large X-ray screening machine that can "see" through 16 inches of
               solid steel - we have some of the first pictures of these devices.
           •   Why terrorists need a scenario with "zero risk."
           •   How a new security chief revamped the Port of Baltimore.
           •   Why Ed Koch believes we are in a "war of civilizations."
           •   The B-54 - America's one-man, 58-pound nuclear weapon.
           •   How the Coast Guard went to sea to head off a suspected nuclear attack on
               New York.
           •   And much, much more.
        This special edition of NewsMax Magazine features an exclusive interview with
        Customs and Border Commissioner Robert Bonner, who counters claims that his
        detection strategy is a "dead end" and says: "We've proven that you can risk-manage
        the terrorist threat."
        Find out how you can get this report FREE. Go Here Now.



Nuclear Terrorist Linked to JFK Plot
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/6/4/101321.shtml?s=lh


Monday, June 4, 2007 10:07 a.m. EDT
                                                           Last Thursday, NewsMax.com featured
                                                           an in-depth story on a little-known name
                                                           in the terrorist underworldwho
                                                           nevertheless has been called the most
                                                           wanted man in America because of his
                                                           efforts to explode nuclear devices.
                                                           Now Monday's New York Post is
                                                           reporting in a Page-One cover story that
                                                           this same man is the suspected "invisible
                                                           hand” behind the plot to bomb a fuel
                                                           pipeline feeding New York’s JFK airport.
                                                           This terrorist is Adnan el-Shukrijumah,
                                                           the so-called "Fixer" behind the 9/11
                                                           attacks.
                                                         He is perhaps the most dangerous man in
                                                         the world because a stunning new book,
                                                         "The Day of Islam: The Annihilation of
                                                         America and the Western World," by a
                                                         former FBI consultant reveals that this
                                                         man is leading al-Qaida's scheme to
detonate nuclear devices in several U.S. cities. [Editor's Note: Get Paul Williams' explosive
"The Day of Islam: The Annihilation of America and the Western World" FREE — Click
Here Now.]
The Post calls el-Shukrijumah the "so called nuclear-whiz kid” — a "tantalizing terror figure”
with a $5 million bounty on his head.
According to the paper, el-Shukrijumah was "the radical big shot investigators hoped to snag in
their 18-month JFK-plot probe.”
The Post also confirmed that he is same man Osama bin Laden has tapped to hatch the terror
group's nuclear plan in the U.S.
According to law enforcement sources, el-Shukrijumah's name surfaced several times during the
FBI's surveillance of the JFK plotters' phone conversations.
Three of the JFK plotters were natives of Guyana, as was Adnan. The Guyana connection caused
raised eyebrows among U.S. investigators. One law enforcement source told the Post that Adnan
was "always in the shadows."
The U.S. was allowing the JFK plot to continue in hopes of snatching el-Shukrijumah, but had to
make arrests when one of the conspirators planned to fly from Trinidad to Venezuela, where the
U.S. has no extradition rights.
Thursday’s NewsMax story, based on Paul L. Williams’ "The Day of Islam: The Annihilation of
America and the Western World" book, included this warning from the author: "No one on
planet earth is more of a threat to the lives and well-being of every man, woman, and child
within the United States than ferret-faced el-Shukrijumah.”
As the story disclosed, Williams has compiled evidence that bin Laden designated el-
Shukrijumah to arrange a simultaneous nuclear attack on seven U.S. cities — New York,
Washington, Los Angeles, Houston, Miami, Boston, and Las Vegas.
el-Shukrijumah is now believed to be operating within the U.S.
[Editor's Note: Get Paul Williams' explosive "The Day of Islam: The Annihilation of
America and the Western World" FREE — Click Here Now.]


China/Russia Deploy New Missiles
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/11/8/13331.sh
tml

Charles R. Smith
Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2001
Chinese missiles can reach U.S. with nuclear warheads.
U.S. defense officials have confirmed that China is preparing to test a new missile capable of
delivering nuclear warheads directly to the United States.
The Chinese Army Second Artillery Corps is preparing to test its new Dong Feng 31, or "East
Wind," ICBM during the next few days. The DF-31 reportedly can carry a single 3-megaton H-
bomb or three 90-kiloton nuclear warheads. The missile has an official range of over 4,800
miles.
The Dong Feng 31 reportedly is equipped with U.S. missile and warhead technology that was
obtained by China through espionage and legal and illegal technology transfers from the Clinton
administration. It is expected that the Chinese army will declare the DF-31 operational within the
next 12 months.
Chinese Navy Missile
The new PLA long-range weapon test comes only days after a Chinese navy test of a similar
submarine-launched nuclear-tipped missile. The China navy test of a Julang 2, or "Great Wave,"
missile took place three weeks ago in an area located off the coast of north central China.
U.S. intelligence sources recorded a "pop-up" test of the JL-2 from a specially modified Chinese
Golf-class diesel submarine. The test simulated the first step in a submarine-launched ballistic
missile firing by ejecting the missile from its tube. In an actual launch, the missile's engine
would be ignited after clearing the submarine.
The Chinese navy plans to deploy the JL-2 missile aboard China's newest ballistic missile
submarine, known as the Type 094. The Chinese navy reportedly will take command of the first
JL-2-equipped Type 094 submarine in the next 12 months.
"From open sources, one cannot assess the real range of the JL-2," noted Richard Fisher, a senior
fellow and defense analyst at the Jamestown Foundation.
"Most sources note it is the sea-borne counterpart to the DF-31, which is credited with a 8,000
km (4,800 mile) range. However, there is some unconfirmed reporting that the JL-2 may have
longer range."
U.S. Navy sources expressed concern that a JL-2-armed submarine could sail to within a few
hundred miles of the U.S. West Coast. Such a move would place West Coast cities at "point-
blank" range, enabling the Chinese submarine to shower Los Angeles or San Francisco with
nuclear warheads. The move would also place most – if not all – U.S. cities within range of the
H-bomb-equipped missile.
"It is likely that the goal for the JL-2 is to be able to reach the western U.S. from the Yellow Sea,
an area that the PLA can defend with near-current ship and aircraft resources. But of course, if
the Type 094 SSBN is able to reach launch points outside this area, the JL-2's reach will
increase," stated Fisher.
"India also fears this new SLBM, as it expects that the PLA will produce enough Type 094
SSBNs to pose a credible second strike presence in the Indian Ocean," noted Fisher.
New Russian Missile
The Chinese missile tests are taking place at the same time Russia is trying to sell a new
supersonic land attack missile. Russian missile maker NPO Mashinostroyenia announced in
October that it was introducing a new version of the SS-N-26 Yahont cruise missile.
The Yahont ramjet-powered missile can reach targets up to 162 nautical miles away at speeds in
excess of 1,500 miles an hour. The Yahont was originally designed to be an anti-ship attack
missile, but NPO Mash is now offering a new version called the Yahont-M that can strike land
targets with "extreme accuracy."
The deadly Yahont missile is being offered for sale to Iran, India and China. The missile can be
air-launched, sea-launched or even launched from a submerged submarine through a torpedo
tube. The Yahont reportedly flies at treetop level at a blistering speed of over 2.6 times the speed
of sound.
NPO Mash is offering the Yahont-M in combination with the Kondor-E targeting satellite.
Russian officials are offering to sell high-resolution satellite data to program the Yahont missile
for land targets or even turn over a complete Kondor-E satellite with a radar designation
targeting system.
The space-based targeting combination is being offered for export "to countries that lack the
over-the-horizon targeting capability" required to operate the Yahont.
China and Iran in Space
U.S. officials are concerned because China reportedly may arm newly-purchased Russian navy
vessels with the deadly Yahont missile. While China may not elect to purchase the Kondor-E
satellite, it can easily modify a newly-developed SMMS imaging satellite to supply the same
space-based targeting information.
According to U.S. defense officials, China and Iran are jointly developing the SMMS, or small
multi-mission spacecraft. The 1,034-lb. satellite will carry a low-resolution CCD camera and
telecommunications systems.
Iranian space engineers were in Beijing in September reviewing progress on the joint space
satellite program. The SMMS satellite is scheduled for launch in 2004 atop a Chinese booster
rocket.
China already has a mature medium resolution space imaging satellite program. However, the
SMMS will allow the PRC and Iran to improve missile targeting and autonomous military
reconnaissance. China has reportedly also offered similar military satellite capabilities to
Pakistan.
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
China/Taiwan
Russia
Middle East
                                                         Missile Defense
                                                         A product that might interest you:
                                                         Adm. Moorer Warns: China Plans War!




                                                         Unrestricted
                                                         Warfare:
                                                         China's Master Plan
                                                         to Destroy America
                                                         Softcover
                                                         ISBN: 0-9716807-2-8
                                                         By Colonels Qiao Liang and Wang
                                                         Xiangsui
                                                         Introduction by Al Santoli
As incredible as it may be to believe, four years before
the Sept. 11 bombing of the World Trade Center a
Chinese military manual titled Unrestricted Warfare
touted such an attack – suggesting it would be difficult
for the U.S. military to cope with.
Here is an excerpt from Unrestricted Warfare:
“Whether it be the intrusions of hackers, a major
explosion at the World Trade Center, or a bombing attack
by bin Laden, all of these greatly exceed the frequency
bandwidths understood by the American military...”
Surprisingly, Osama bin Laden is mentioned frequently
in this book.
Now NewsMax.com is making the CIA translation of
this shocking book available to all Americans.
On Sept. 11, 2001, Americans and the world witnessed
one of the most horrific acts ever to take place on
American soil.
Our media and government were quick to declare the acts
of that day as simply terrorism by a nationless group
known as al-Qaeda.
In reading China’s military manual Unrestricted
Warfare, you will learn that the events of Sept. 11 were
not a random act perpetrated by independent agents.
Instead, Chinese military planners believe that terrorism
is just one of the many tools at the hands of nations and
their terrorist allies to wage total war against the United
States.
You will be surprised to learn:
   •   The two PLA colonels who authored
       Unrestricted Warfare have been hailed as
       heroes in China since Sept. 11
   •   The Chinese state-run propaganda machine is
       cashing in on the terror attacks ... producing
       books, films and video games glorifying the
       strikes as a humbling blow against an arrogant
       nation.
   •   Chinese Communist Party officials are saying that
       President Jiang Zemin has obsessively and
       gleefully watched and re-watched pictures of the
       aircraft crashing into the World Trade Center.
   •   The CIA’s own translation agency reported that
       this book identifies the U.S. as China’s main
       enemy, and details how a weak nation can destroy
       America using unorthodox attacks – like the 9-11
       attacks.
   •   China is preparing itself and encouraging others
       to engage the U.S. in total war. The book is chock
       full of plans and strategies, from using computers,
       to smuggling illegal immigrants, to manipulating
       the stock markets, to influencing the U.S. media,
       to using weapons of mass destruction – all to
       destroy America.
Recent press reports indicate that China has assisted and
continues to assist militarily and economically the
Taliban and al-Qaeda – even after Sept. 11.
The doctrine of total war outlined in Unrestricted
Warfare clearly demonstrates that the People’s Republic
of China is preparing to confront the United States and
our allies by conducting “asymmetrical” or
multidimensional attacks on almost every aspect of our
social, economic and political life.
The media and Congress are keeping a lid on this book
because of the implications of U.S.-China economic and
trade relations.
But now you can bypass them by getting a copy yourself!
    Here’s what others say about Unrestricted Warfare:
    “You need to read Unrestricted Warfare because it
    reveals China’s game plan in its coming war with
    America.. ... China thinks it can destroy America by
    using these tactics.”
    Adm. Thomas Moorer
    Former Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff
    “The 9-11 attacks may just be the beginning. Many
    terrorist nations and groups will try to imitate this
    operation … and China’s war book Unrestricted
    Warfare will be their text.”
    Maj. Gen. John K. Singlaub
    Former Chief of Staff,
    US Forces Korea
    “Unrestricted Warfare is evidence linking China to 9-
    11. It is also their plan for global operations against
    America.”
    Wilson C. Lucom
    Endwar.com
    To purchase the book, click: NewsMax.com -
    America's News Page.




Unrestricted Warfare REVIEWS from AMAZON Customers
57 of 68 people found the following review helpful:

            It's all true and the truth does hurt., March 2, 2004
By U2pop "u2pop" (Atlanta) - See all my reviews
This is a padded edition with more hype on terrorism and fear than
necessary. The original text by Lang and Xiangsui is a fascinating look at
the true weaknesses of the American military system. It is with this book
that China identifies America as its sole predominate enemy.
I fully believe and support our military in any and all of its endeavors.
However the book correctly points out, among other things, that the US
has an obsession with human casualties. It is because of this that wars are
fought from a distance, with technology, in order to minimize casualties.
This is something that is very evident to anyone who's looked at the
American military's history. From World War 2 to Desert Storm II, the
increased use of technology and the public outcry over casualties has
increased ten fold. This book, correctly so, advances the theory that in the
event of a war between China and America, there will be an
unconventional war sorts or rather "the war will be fought an won in a war
beyond the battlefield" using terrorism, financial institutions, computer
hackers, among many others.
The sale of this book is mainly a money making scheme since the CIA
translation is available for free all over the internet. On the other hand, this
is an excellent book for any foreign policy enthusiast, but more
importantly, for those military intelligence analysts who we hope are
reading it. This is what China really thinks and the truth really does hurt.




 Seven prophetic visions seen by William Branham in 1933
In June of 1933, while preparing for a two-week tent meeting in Jeffersonville Indiana, William Branham
experienced a series of 7 prophetic visions. William Branham said:

         The Lord Jesus spoke to me and said that the coming of the Lord was drawing nigh, but that before

         He came, seven major events would transpire. I wrote them all down and that morning I gave forth

         the revelation of the Lord.[1]
      The following is a summary of the seven visions and links to more detailed analysis of the fulfilment of
      each of these prophecies:


                                                                1) Mussolini would invade Ethiopia, and later come to
                                                                a shameful demise.




                                                                2) Adolph Hitler would start the Second World War,
                                                                and come to a mysterious end.




                                                                3) Facism and Nazism would be swallowed up into
                                                                Communism, and Russia would emerge from the
                                                                U.S.S.R.




                                                                4) Science would advance to the point where cars
                                                                would no longer require drivers.




                                                                5) American morals would pervert and decline
                                                                considerably.



                                                                6) A beautiful, but cruel, woman would rise to great
                                                                power in the United States.
                                                            7) America would be reduced to debris, craters, and
                                                            smoke.




Destruction of Los Angeles
From BelieveTheSign
Jump to: navigation, search




The Biltmore Hotel, Downtown Los Angeles, where William Branham prophecied that Los Angeles would roll into the sea.

William Branham had just finished preaching a series of meetings in Los Angeles in April 1965, when he was
asked bythe Full Gospel Business Men who organized the meetings to preach just one more service for them.
So, on April 29, William Branham stood behind the podium at the Biltmore Hotel in Los Angeles,and preached
a sermon called "Choosing of a Bride".
Two notable things occurred during this service:

    1.     There was a steady stream of people leaving the building during the service who could not handle the severity

         of the preaching. These included the same people who had attended (and engaged in) William Branham's

         sermons in LA since April the 24th.

    2.     During this sermon, William Branham prophecied that the city of Los Angeles would one day slide into the

         ocean, and a new coastline would form at the Salton Sea.
Recent Significant L.A. Earthquakes
             Date                      Epicenter           Strength
        March 16, 2010         Pico Rivera (10 miles SE)     4.4
       January 17, 1994          Reseda (20 miles NW)        6.7
        October 1, 1987          Rosemead (8 miles E)        5.9
       February 9, 1971          Sylmar (24 miles NW)        6.6
        March 10, 1933         Long Beach (20 Miles S)       6.4




The Honeycomb and the Sandbar
Signal Hill, May 1, 1923: Oil extraction honeycombing the oilsands

Los Angeles is one of the largest cities in the world. It is also one of the only cities in the
world with significant active oil extraction within city limits. The sediment in the Los Angeles
basin is up to 6 miles (10 km) deep, and includes the following oil fields:

1.     Long Beach Oil Field

2.     Los Angeles City Oil Field

3.     Wilmington Oil Field (3rd largest oil field in the U.S.)

4.     Huntington Beach Oil Field

5.     Torrance Oil Field

6.     Beverly Hills Oil Field
Combined with the danger of existing fault lines that Los Angeles sits on, the potential for a
devestating natural disaster is scientifically plausible.
Time Magazine[1] recorded the partial sinking of Long Beach in the 1950s, blaming the
cause on excessive drilling in the area. Since that time, oil producers have been pumping
water into the earth to replace the oil they extract. The only problem with this process is
that water has different properties than oil, as residents of Daisetta, Texas learned in 2008
when the walls of an underground salt-cave (from which oil brine had been extracted)
disolved, creating a sink-hole 900 feet wide by 260 feet deep.[2] Between 1932 and 1960
iodine was harvested from oil brine extracted in the Los Angeles basin - raising the question
of whether the water being pumped into the earth is currently disolving structural minerals
under Los Angeles.
One problem with subsistence (the sinking of land) is that it can create megatsunamis if
they occur near water. History records the following megatsunamis created by landslides:

1.      365 AD - 100ft waves hit Alexandria after an earthquake off Crete.

2.      1792 AD - 330ft waves killed 15,000 villagers when parts of Mount Unzen, Japan slid
into the sea.

3.      1958 AD - 1,720ft waves destroyed Lituya Bay, Alaska, after an earthquake caused a
landslide.



        And, of course, the Salton Sea is about two hundred feet below sea level, and if that
        big churning, that earth swallowing in like that, with hundreds of square miles,
        hundreds and hundreds of square miles sinking into the earth, that'll throw a tidal
        wave plumb to Arizona. (Sermon:Ashamed of Him, Jeffersonville, Indiana, July 11,
        1965)


         And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be
         likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand (Matthew 7:26)




America in Ashes
From BelieveTheSign
Jump to: navigation, search
             February 2, 2011 Update


     The U.S. and Russia sign a new START treaty,
     limiting each countries nuclear warheads and
    launchers, and allowing each country to visually
   inspect the other country's weapons. BBC Online


In June 1933, William Branham experienced a series of 7 prophetic visions. In the seventh and final vision
there was an explosion, and the nation of America was turned into ashes from coast to coast. Soon after,
on September 12, 1933, LeóSzilárd conceived of the idea of the nuclear chain reaction while waiting for a
red light in Bloomsbury, England.




THIS   VISION HAS YET TO BE FULFILLED.


The Prophecy
The last and seventh vision was wherein I heard a most terrible explosion. As I turned to
look I saw nothing but debris, craters, and smoke all over the land of America.
         'Laodicean Church Age Book", Chapter 9, William Branham




William Branham's suggestions on the Method and Motive of America's Destruction
    I want to ask you something. They claim that this new hydrogen bomb... And that's the only ones we know of.
    We don't know what they got back the sleeve. But they can stand in Moscow, Russia, and time a bomb right
    on this building by the stars, and guide it by radar, and got them placed to every major nation, and every
    major city in the world. Just pull on a string, and there she goes. Somebody's going to drink too much vodka
    one day; there it'll be.

      Sermon: A Greater Than Solomon Is Here, Bloomington, IL, April 12, 1961.


         When God sends a gift to the people and they'll recognize it, it's always a golden age. But when they
         refuse it, there's nothing left but a chaos for that generation. Now, listen closely. If God had sent the
         Holy Spirit in this age for a sign, and we reject It, there's nothing left but a destruction. But if we refuse
         it, we'll sure to be blowed off the earth. The atomic bombs are hanging ready now, each one afraid to pull
         the trigger.But someday, they'll have too much vodka and press the trigger. And when that--that bomb
         passes through that radar, sound... When it goes through there, there'll be others go the other way. And
         you know what will take place? The world can't stand it. ...Before that can happen, the Church will be gone.

      Sermon: The Queen of Sheba, Tifton, GA, January 10, 1960.


Today's Recipe For Disaster

              America's Enemies

              In the process of trying to create peace and stability for herself and other nations, the United States
              has become a common target of hatred of various movements and governments aroung the world.
              Newspapers today are filled with articles on the United States and her involvement in foreign wars,
              and coverage of the negative local response to such involvement. With many countries possessing
              or developing nuclear technology and advanced delivery systems, it's not hard to imagine the
              devestation and destruction that might occur if irresponsible agression materialized.

              Recent Disasters

              1.       Oklahoma City Bombing

              2.       9/11 - New York in Ashes

              3.       New Orleans & Hurricane Katrina
Past Updates

Sept. 17, 2009: Obama shelves Europe missile plan. BBC Online

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:0
posted:9/22/2012
language:English
pages:63