VIEWS: 0 PAGES: 34 POSTED ON: 9/18/2012
Quality Analysis Report Quality Assurance Activities Summary http://code.google.com/p/isec-deis-mis-ds-ps-group1/ 2008/2009 IPC ISEC-DEIS Summary • Trinity • Quality Roadmap – Quality Vision – Quality Actions – Quality Metrics • Quality Assurance Activities • Change Control Activities • Network Knowledge • Survey • Lessons Learned 3 Master Plan Trinity Quality Vision Quality Roadmap Qualitative Quantitative Software is develped right the Conformance to correct first time as much as possible requirements User Satisfaction Internal Value Quality Actions Quality Roadmap Metrics Test Campaign Templates; Guidelines Inspection Activities Review Activities Walkthrough Activities Quality Metrics Quality Roadmap Number of quality activities conducted Number of changes to project schedule and milestones Number of tests by requirement Number of tests failed and passed Change Request Impact Network Knowledge Lessons Learned Self Evaluation Quality Assurance Activities Quality Analysis Report http://code.google.com/p/isec-deis-mis-ds-ps-group1/ 2008/2009 IPC ISEC-DEIS QAA Coverage Quality Assurance Activities Document Quality Activity Notes RA N.A. Due to its specificity it was included in the global results PI walkthrough - SDP review After a review, it was decided by the author to conduce a walkthrough SDP walkthrough - PAR N.A. This document will be closed after QAR. So, it was excluded from the metrics collects. Although, it will be under walkthrough QAP walkthrough Walkthrough, but was conduced before the processes and the document it self are agreed. QAP review QAR N.A. It refers to this document. Because this document refers to the metrics it self, it was excluded from statistics and analysis. Although, it will be under walkthrough CCP review - CSD walkthrough - UIP walkthrough - UR review - SRS inspection-doc - SA review - TCP review - ITS review - ATS review - UIR walkthrough - ATR walkthrough - UM walkthrough - Code1 N.A. This code was under test campaign Code2 inspection-code - General Statistics Quality Assurance Activities General Statistics # Total minor defects found in eighteen (18) 896 documents Total major defects found in eighteen (18) 12 documents Average of Nº defects found by document 49.8 Nº of pages under review 306 Nº of defects found by page 2.9 Work time in documents 267 hours Work time in document reviews 128 hours Nº of Walkthroughs 8 Nº of Reviews 8 Nº of Inspections 2 Quality Assurance Meetings Quality Assurance Activities 25% 75% Cost in hours of QAA Quality Assurance Activities 10% 90% Total nº defects by doc & nº defects by document Quality Assurance Activities 560.00 193.00 138.00138.00 70.00 24.13 5.00 5.00 walkthrough review inspection-doc inspection-code Nº Defects by doc & by hour review Quality Assurance Activities 138.00 70.00 24.13 12.81 7.67 4.38 5.00 0.18 walkthrough review inspection-doc inspection-code Time spent by page & nº of defects by page Quality Assurance Activities 14.00 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 PI SDP SDP QAP CCP CSD UIP UR SRS SA TCP ITS ATS UIR ATR UM Nº of effort hours by page & nº of defects by page Walkthrough Activities 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 PI SDP CSD UIP UIR ATR UM Nº of effort hours by page & nº of defects by page Review Activities 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 SDP QAP CCP UR SA TCP ITS ATS Combined Results Walkthrough Activities 40 35 30 Author Effort 25 Aut. Eff by Pag 20 Avg Effort by Rev 15 Avg Def by Rev Avg Def by Pag 10 5 0 PI SDP CSD UIP UIR ATR UM Combined Results Review Activities 70 60 50 Author Effort 40 Aut. Eff by Pag Avg Effort by Rev 30 Avg Def by Rev 20 Avg Def by Pag 10 0 SDP QAP CCP UR SA TCP ITS ATS Global Statistics Code Inspection # 13% Java 5874 Java JSP 2444 JSP VB.net 26% VB.net 1263 61% Total 9581 % insp 3.49% 3% Minor Def 5 Major Def 7 Potential Hiden Defects 97% Minor 142 Major 200 Change Control Activities Quality Analysis Report http://code.google.com/p/isec-deis-mis-ds-ps-group1/ 2008/2009 IPC ISEC-DEIS General Statistics Change Control Activities Data Start Data End Days Impact Reason Hours QAP 04/06/2009 29/06/2009 25 5 Environment Changes UR 27/05/2009 31/05/2009 4 7 Remove Defects UR 12/06/2009 13/06/2009 1 1 Environment Changes SA 10/06/2009 12/06/2009 2 23 Remove Defects SA 04/07/2009 06/07/2009 2 6 Environment Changes TCP 01/07/2009 02/07/2009 1 0.5 Environment Changes ITS 30/06/2009 02/07/2009 2 0.5 Environment Changes General Statistics Change Control Activities 30 25 25 20 15 10 5 4 5 2 2 2 1 1 0 QAP UR UR SA SA TCP ITS Average Impact of CR & development time Change Control Activities 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 QAP UR UR SA SA TCP ITS Templates, Guidelines, Repository Configuration Management • Templates • Guidelines • Checklists • Convention for filesname • Google Docs + Codes + Groups • Other Tools – MS Project is a complex tool ( Openproject should be an option next years ) – MS Office fulfill its expectations, but Network Knowledge Quality Analysis Report http://code.google.com/p/isec-deis-mis-ds-ps-group1/ 2008/2009 IPC ISEC-DEIS Areas Network Knowledge Area Description PM & RA Project Management and Risk Analysis A& R & I Architecture, Requirements and Implementation QA & CC Quality Assurance and Change Control TC Test Campaign Forum Network Knowledge Nº Posts 975 Nº Topics 136 Jul Apr 209 110 Avg ~7.2 May 332 Jun 324 TC 14 PM & RA 40 A &R&I 34 QA & CC 48 Wiki Pages Network Knowledge TC PM & RA 1 1 A & R& I 2 QA & CC 7 Survey Quality Analysis Report http://code.google.com/p/isec-deis-mis-ds-ps-group1/ 2008/2009 IPC ISEC-DEIS Configuration Management & Quality Management Survey Quality Assurance Questioner Score [0-10] The QAP was clear and detailed enough. 8.4 The QAP contributed to the successful execution of my tasks. 8.5 The QAP contributed to the successful execution of the 8.3 project. The Google Mailing List (Forum) contributed to share my 8.9 knowledge with my colleagues. The Google Code (SVN & Wiki) was demonstrated being a 9.3 properly tool to this project. The Google Docs (Weakly Report) was demonstrated being 9.2 an adequate tool to be used in this project. The Quality Manager knew his responsibilities. 9.3 Lessons Learned Quality Analysis Report http://code.google.com/p/isec-deis-mis-ds-ps-group1/ 2008/2009 IPC ISEC-DEIS Summary Lessons Learned • Start meetings at time • Communication is important • Simulate inspections (trainning sessions) • Motivation, comprehensive and calm • Right choice of development tools • Time invested in the project planning • Testers should follow the SA/DD development • A software project should have a ratio of 3 developers to 1 tester Final Conclusion, Recomendations Quality Analysis Report • The Quality Assurance Activities are conducted with rigor and accuracy. The team members followed the guidelines provided by the three plan documents: QAP, CCP and TCP. • The number of change request (five (5) out seven (7) - only two correcting defects) shows that mainly the documents are developed right the first time. • The final product conform its requirements and requirements are fully accomplished. • The Quality Team presents a several Thank you !
Pages to are hidden for
"Direction sign"Please download to view full document